Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (336)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Wheres Jack Nicholson!? Can't find him!

  • Barenboim has been a great "guide" for Lang Lang. It seems he is recognizing the nuances that a listener can perceive in his interpretations, and he is performing better overall.

  • If this was a master class, I don't know what Barenboim could have corrected him about his playing

  • Why is Daniel Barenboim standing right next to Lang?

  • @caskett7lu He is turning pages.

  • @MrGeJimo  Seems a bit overdone. Couldn't they have picked up somebody else for that?

  • 62 person can´t play as well as Lang lang, but they want to xD

  • Not a big fan overall of the piece but I really like the passage from 1:33-1:50. IMO it sounds like it belongs in one of Chopin's polonaises. I like the lyrical aspect of it.

  • ㅋㅋㅋ옆에 바렌보임 왜이렇게 웃기지....

  • lol, the guy at 1:28 has clearly been dragged there by his wife

  • damn i can't concentrate on the music while watching because this guy makes so much of a show around his playing :/

  • @DeinVorbild95 Do like I do. Read comments while listening)))

  • oh look...urtext...

  • his eyes....

  • Beautiful!

  • Is that Barenboim?

  • @SongsofInnocence no it's your momma!  i kids it is.

  • I don't see what all the fuss is about. He seems to be pretty good. I mean, his interpretations and touch aren't my favorite, but just because you dislike the way he plays does NOT mean you can say he's playing it wrong.

    I don't think it can be any better stated than mrpolaroid123's comment did.

  • OMFG!Just shut up and listen to the fucking music!Why you all have to ''understand'' the composer, the interpreter, the classical music?It's a normal music, just like jazz or pop, and no one has to study to hear and understand Brubeck or Shakira.Why someone would have to to understand Beethoven, to analyze an interpretation?I'm so tired of that classical music deification! When you hear a Beatles' cover, you dont care about what Lennon would think, you just like or dislike it!

  • @MrCarolinaMachado

    Classical music usually goes must deeper on an artistic level than pop music and therefore correct artistic interpretation is necessary in order to adequately and accurately convey the intent and meaning of a piece as it was written by its composer.

  • @ratzlp0li Chopin Etude Op.10 No.5 in G flat Major "Black Keys", Horowitz

    Ne me quitte pas, Jacques Brel

    Which one "goes deeper on an artistic level"? I know it's just one example, but you can't generalize an entire musical style like this.

  • @MrCarolinaMachado

    There's a distinction between 'serious' and 'light' music. For the serious, interpretation matters.

  • @ratzlp0li But interpretation and technique matters in classical music as much as in popular music.

  • personalmente non amo molto questa interpretazione, preferisco lang in altro

  • why is Jack Nicholson standing there?

  • @fajmr0 Where is Jack N?

  • @TheLOonis I mean Barenboim looks like Jack N

  • you are all really up ones own ass,to me this man is class

  • I would love to read how this piece "should" be played and "what is the idea" and "what Beethoven meant" from these amazingly professional piano criticals here on youtube, writing stuff like "I did not fell anything" is just trying to play "cool artist guy" with no fundaments at all, the difference between play and perform is to be able to think about what do I want to transmit and what is stetically good according to the literature of the piece itself.

    regards.

  • Just great!!!!!! Thank you for sharing.

  • mrpolaroid123 & lllAVoicelll need to be on talk radio where bantering is what it's all about and get off you tube.

  • epic face expressions

  • any clue why daniel barenboim is page turning for him? was this a clinic of some kind?

  • @jscgreer

    Yes, it was.

  • what a miserable looking crowd, i would be awed to be there

  • une superbe interprétation, pleine de passion.

  • @TheBigGeorgy And you, my friend, clearly don't understand a damned thing about music. It's fine to disagree with an interpretation, but saying that one does not "understand" a sonata would be akin to spitting in the face of Beethoven. You don't seem to understand that the one thing about this... About Apassionata, or any of Beethoven's sonatas for that matter, is that they are UNIVERSALLY understandable, yet capable of yielding an infinite amount of interpretations. That's what true music is.

  • This is from Barenboim's master class. See Barenboim's corrections and Lang Lang's changes later.

    No idea to bicker here, see the whole picture instead

  • 6:36 2girls1cup on his Ipad

  • If I don't look at him but just listen to Lang Lang play, then it's ok, but for sure, watching his grotesque and over the top emotions and expressions puts me off this piece=)

  • look at the red glasses around 09:46

  • Comment removed

  • He may not play with the best feel for the peace. But he is sight reading very well. And besides you people should at least respect his playing.

  • Now THAT'S what I call sight-reading!

  • What i like from Lang Lang, he learnt from his own perfomanc, soon he will play this piece again and will wow the audience, trust me , i know him.

  • this is bloody awful. no musicality. pure gush, no true emotion.

  • i've yet to hear lang lang create music

  • It is very clear even for me as a 16 year old with no Experience that Lang Lang has little Experience with Beethoven's Sonata's because they where made during Beethoven's dark period of life which is where the speed is ignorantly mistaken and the man who is helping with the notes know's its not right to play this in this fashion But is astounded but at the same time Lang Lang is showing how Masterful he is by improvising this great Movement to a extent that still sounds brilliantly astounding

  • @a231995andrewa What is mistaken about the speed of this sonata? Should it be faster or slower?

  • Look at em chins :D))

  • Does this man know notes??? Beethoven write it in another way. Oh, shit...

  • Comment removed

  • Perhaps it would be better if he wore his converse shoes on his hands.

  • His facial expressions are a joke. Because he does not understand the music at all, he must pretend he does by creating those awful grimaces which are a most utterly disgraceful slight against high art music and what it is.

  • @NoahSV Listen with your eyes closed.

  • @NoahSV seriously, you arent a musician i can see that immediatly. You dont get the point of music. stop being jealous on him cause u will never hevae the skills he has.

  • He is reading from the music? As if it's some kind of game. Lang Lang is completely overrated. I will admit, he has very fine pianistic skills, but I would not say he is a good pianist in any respects.

  • @NoahSV yea he sucks, thats why he's got barenboim turning his pages, Barenboim usually does that for all the shitty pianists in town. You should make a video and show Lang Lang and the world how this piece should be played correctly. can you? I seriously doubt it

  • dam, some professionals have to be n crack to be barely as good as him

  • I love how close the camera is and you can observe the hands and where his eyes look..

  • i cant sightread so i just memorize the whole thing

  • pure sightreading?

  • Hahahaha...the world has too many haters. They are just jealous. That's why they would never become a great musician. FYI, I love classic music but not a musician. I do understand that when you can't appreciate other people's talents because you are blinded by your own short coming, you are doomed to fail. I repeat. You are doomed to fail...

  • It's clearly enough that Lang Lang does not understand this sonata...

  • Bravo !!!

  • @TheBigGeorgy how can u know?

  • @TheDardanius Well, do you know something about this sonata? This sonata is one of the darkest, painful and agonic pieces that Beethoven ever wrote... and in this performance you can't hear or feel none of that... To be a good pianist is not enough an amazing technique, you need also a good understanding and the knowledge of how to express it. And this is one of the "weaker" Appassionatas that I ever heard...

  • @TheDardanius Don't misunderstand me, I got a big respect for Lang Lang, he is an amazing pianist, and I really enjoy with some of his Liszt's performances, but his understanding at this piece is zero.

  • @TheBigGeorgy ok maybe true a bit... this appastionata sonata is written during the dark times of his life , as well as the most chaotic and pianoful times. youres right, but i think he did well on the 3rd movements.

  • @TheBigGeorgy I disagree actually.

  • @TheBigGeorgy it´s clearly enough that wr993r9w and cc to br3e3e otherwise, miau haha drei! i´m sure the fat guy in 1:28 does. i´m sure you do! ahahahahahaha

  • @TheBigGeorgy I think it's more you don't understand Lang Lang

  • @mrpolaroid123 Oh, and should I do it?? I'm listening a Beethoven work here... His role is to transmit what the composer wrote in this piece, and he doesn't.

  • @TheBigGeorgy His 'role' is to play the piece and to his interpret in his own way. Beethoven has given him the nots, Lang Lang now reworks it with his own touch and style. It would appear you have heard Beethoven himself play the piece and are aware of exactly how it should sound? I'm now beginning to think you don't understand classical music...At the end of the day, you either like an 'interpretation' or you don't. To say Lang Lang doesn't understand comes across as rather ignorant

  • @mrpolaroid123 But Beethoven was different than most composers. He was extremely strict and demanding and wanted his music to be played exactly the way he wanted it to play hence all the dynamic markings on the music.

  • @Vesivian on the other hand, it would have been a totally different performance. A big, powerful man would have shown a completely different side to this piece. This surely is what keeps classical music fresh and alive? No? Who wants to hear the same piece played by different artists in the same way?

  • @Vesivian I agree he was strict as was Chopin, however you can listen to as many different performers playing this as you want and each one will be different. Several weeks ago I heard this live, played by the Korean pianist Young Choon Park and she played it, I feel, as her stature allowed. She was probably around 4.5 inc and very petite. She played it how i had never heard it before, yet I wouldn't have said it was wrong, or disrespectful toward the composer. If it had been John Ogden

  • @mrpolaroid123 I won't say that this guy is not talented,since everyone has their own perspective on what talent is.However people that do recognize him as talented must understand that part of the interpreter's role is the understanding of the writer's song.If you ask me Lang focuses his interpretation more in his way of playing the song than the song is in itself.

    By the way Beethoven isnt a classical, musician he belongs to the romanticist movement,think twice before calling someone ignorant.

  • @IIIAVoiceIII who's music really does belong to the 'Romantic' period. There seems to be this stigma against Lang Lang, which is a shame, because he is a fabulous pianist and I believe I have the credentials and training to have seen, heard and studied around enough fabulous pianists to have that, educated, opinion. As for your final paragraph about Beethoven belonging to the 'Romanticist movement' and me using the word ignorant to loosely, I fear I may have to put you in that category too.

  • @IIIAVoiceIII Oh dear oh dear oh dear. While a lot of musical performances can indeed be put down to opinions, educated or not. Certain parts of music remain fact. Beethoven (1770 - 1827) was born into what we class as the 'Classical' period, (1750 -1830) So his music is well within the realms of this and not the 'Romantic' as you seemed to propose. His music nevertheless is romantic, he broke ground in this area especially in his later works. Not in the same way as Chopin or Liszt

  • @mrpolaroid123 Excuse me for this observation but i think i never question whether he was born into or not to the Classical period. By saying he belonged to the romanticist movement i referred to where is his music categorized into ,which is finally what we are talking about , since I remarked in your previous comment (which apparently you have deleted) "I'm starting to doubt of your comprehension of classical music".

    I never said that Beethoven wasn't born into the classical period indeed he

  • @IIIAVoiceIII I have not deleted any comments. You need to work on your English. Communication is key to expressing what your thoughts are. Good luck.

  • @mrpolaroid123 Yes because Beethoven gave the nots to Lang Lang.

  • @mrpolaroid123 even was tutored by the great Mozart himself , however (excuse me if this sounds too ignorant for your Wiki research) Beethoven is the grand opener of the Romanticist movement not only in Germany , in the whole musical world (if you ask me in the literary and visual arts aspect too). This only makes obvious the fact that he is considered into the romanticist movement being the majority of his works (including this one).

  • @IIIAVoiceIII I clearly state below the impact Beethoven had on the romantic period, that does not change the fact he was born into the Classical period.

  • @IIIAVoiceIII If you are telling me that you consider Beethoven to be a Classicist for the date of his birth rather than the characteristics of his works then Suddenly Frederich Nietzsche became a romantic writer ,and Anthony Salieri becomes a baroque musician. I can't believe I am actually discussing this.

  • @mrpolaroid123 By the way I just saw your Comment on top, excuse me for my blindness rather that my ignorance. :)

  • @mrpolaroid123 Don't get me wrong i never meant to questions the pianist's talent in my first comment, as i believe i said in the beginning, its his interpretations that bother me, this kind of people should dedicate themselves to music composition rather than interpretation it is then wen they can show off all they want. There are indeed some exceptions in with music interpretation becomes more free like in the case of trans genera interpretations but it is only natural that the interpret then

  • @mrpolaroid123 Shows us his understanding of the work. This is ,however , not Lang Lang's case , and his intent to show off his abilities does get out the music's track oftenly

  • @IIIAVoiceIII If you are not watching Lang Lang and just listen, how do you find it then?

  • @mrpolaroid123 And i need help with my english? I would appreciate if you re-post this, it is incomprehensible.

  • @IIIAVoiceIII You do need help with your (E)nglish, yes! You are confusing regards sentence structure, spelling and generally communicating your feelings! I can't begin to comprehend how you can start analysing music. Go away, look at what you have achieved musically, critique yourself in a constructive manner, compare yourself with others and constructively critique them. That way, after years of practice and experimenting, you will be in a better place to judge.

    Best of luck

  • @mrpolaroid123 You are right because calling ignorant anyone who doesn't agree with your opinion, even though you have never seen them in your life, is constructive critique.

    Excuse me , but constructive criticism requires arguments, which apparently you have run out of, leaving disqualification as your last resort. Pardon me for the observation but you don't know me at all, however you talk bout my music as if you did(Which we were not talking about in the first place) -

  • @mrpolaroid123 By doing so you can only lead me to think that you are angry and use verbal aggressions to shield yourself, which leaves yourself exposed since you said I was (Quote)"communicating my feelings_!_". Sorry but if anyone has maintained neutral in this discussion it has been me , since calling someone ignorant for having a discrepancy in his opinion is disqualification , telling that person nicely why he shouldn't do so is constructive criticism.

  • @IIIAVoiceIII in the direct sense of being 'Ignorant' rather that it may appear that way if you put across a view with very little grounding. I don't need to know you personally, as I can grasp a pretty basic outline of you, from what you have written. You're more than capable of showing me through text that you are impatient, intolerant and relentless in your never ending quest to prove a point.

    Being critical has nothing to do with arguing. You really need a crash course in debating. Bye.

  • @mrpolaroid123 Let me make several observations in your comment. You mention in your comment that I write "time wasting comments".Am i the one that finds this time wasting? indeed i don't I do find entertainment in discussion. However you do say you find this time wasting. Excuse me but i don't force you to reply every comment I write. There is a psychological analysis intent in your comment by saying I try to hide some insecurity,but you do spend time in something you -

  • @mrpolaroid123 find time wasting while nobody is forcing you to do so. I hope it is clear the insecurity is shown in someone else here. Another observation in your comment is that you say that through my text you are capable of showing my intolerance, impatience and relentlessness.Would you mind showing me on which of my posts this i show any of this? In any case the intolerant person would be you calling ignorance those opinions that differ from yours. You do show relentlessness when changing-

  • @mrpolaroid123 subjects whenever you were out of arguments always changing to a more personal subject.As my last observation i would like to quote your penultimate sentence:"Being critical has nothing to do with arguing" i never mentioned the word arguing so i will have to suppose you meant "being critical has nothing to do with argumentation".If you say criticism requires no arguments you must then think that criticism is saying :"This is good because i think its good if you think differently -

  • @mrpolaroid123 you are wrong". There is something called professional criticism ,for which argumentation is not only valid ; it is essential to it. All this response to your comments was my failed intent to squeeze out any fact supported opinion you could aport,however the closest I got was the "Beethoven is a Classical musician because he was born into the period, not for the characteristics of his works."

    If you have anything intelligent to discuss ill feel glad to have a non disqualifying -

  • @mrpolaroid123 discussion, otherwise this is my last comment, disqualification truly is as waste of time.

  • @IIIAVoiceIII You seem a little strung up on the whole 'Ignorant' thing. Which on one hand is slightly amusing to me and on the other, a sign that you are covering up for some sort of insecurity. I'm not sure, but it has obviously troubled you to the point that you have taken it upon yourself to write me yet another pointless, time wasting message. If you refer back to 'Above' which quoted 'Ignorant' you will note I did not refer to you as being

  • @TheBigGeorgy I have to agree. Though Lang Lang plays technically very well, there is a sense for me at least listening to this interpretation that here lang lang doesn't really get what the hell Beethoven is trying to say. His interpretation is great on a piece by piece of this piece, but as a whole, I personally feel he didn't get it.

  • Comment removed

  • @TheBigGeorgy the classical music is not only for the pride or joy of majiority for western people ! I think the Beethoven himself is more good for him.

  • @TheBigGeorgy I agree. Sure he hits all keys. But I don't feel anything, any idea is missing, what this music means. It's all in the score.

  • Everyone hating on Lang Lang upload your own interpretation and show us all how awesome you are!

  • @MarlaAnnee There is no need to be an artist to appreciate the art.

  • lang lang don't have a interpretation

  • this is just disgusting, his playing is more overstated and garish than anything I have ever seen seen. If Beethoven was turning any more in his grave he'd be drilling a hole in it.

  • @Shanefee1770 Ummm... lets see your interpretation please. I am sure Beethoven doesn't give a shit anyways. You'd think he care more about his music bringing joy to people so long after his death...

  • @MarlaAnnee "I am sure Beethoven doesn't give a shit anyways", how flippantly you assume the casualness of one of western music's greatest geniuses. I am quite sure that Beethoven would indeed "give a shit" about such sloppy pedalling and poor finger-work, (the lack of fluidity is simply appalling) not to mention an abrasive and insensitive approach to the instrument. Brendel interprets this magnificently, however stick with Bang Bang if shallow showmanship is more your thing.

  • While Lang Lang is playing here, his face is more expressive than his playing itself.

  • hahaha...

  • Lang Lang is good, but I don't think he is able to play Beethoven's sonatas now. Maybe 20 years later. I can hear nothing from the performance.

  • I wondered how he would have played if Barenboim wasn't sittin' there watching his ass

  • Nobody has played this or any of Beethoven's piano sonatas better than Emil Gilels.

  • @Terrantuladic Sorry, the best Appassionata is Sv. Richter's

  • Althought I am not crazy about Lang Lang's facial expressions but I must say that he played amazingly good. I was totally emotionally involved by his playing. I did all these by not looking at him and just listen to the sound of this play.

  • Comment removed

  • You've got to hand it to Lang Lang--he's poetic and then vulgar, razor sharp and then sloppy, but all the while a mezmerizing musician who brought fun back to the classics. Beethoven would have slapped him for his arrogance and then kissed him for bringing adventure and excitement into his music.

  • A beautiful copy off Myra Hess why play nobody piano according to him I think sometimes everyone can compose to feel how to interpret Music.

    There are none a perfect interpretation also composer play often one way or the other to copy is fatal.

    Best regards!

    Piotr.

  • even beehoven was god

  • People will never know the true meaning meaning of muse...

  • pretentious pricks... all you care about is Lang Langs facial expressions!

  • he makes unnecessary faces

    

  • Lovely face expressions !

  • Comment removed

  • Baronboim is a master. Do what he says!

  • mullet is not bad lang lang, not bad at all

  • It's like a machine wanting to show us that it has feelings.

    Sorry, Kempff, Barenboim, Kissin and a long list of musicians will be before this over valuated guy.

  • It really looks like Beethoven is confusing Lang Lang.

  • Lang Lang is wearing jeans and looking at the score. Barenboim is turning pages for him and even fixed the pages. I was amazed at the atmonphere created here. Enjoyabled.

  • Definitely this guy is god

  • He is so cute! And I love his eyes... his violence at the keyboard, maybe not...

  • @viktoruschka FYI Beethoven is not Jewish.

  • @tejaachebrole Of course he was not! Jesus Christ! Do you believe the stupid theory that he was descendent of some niggers or some Jewish people (kikes, i think they say in Amerika?!) Please....

  • I LIKE HIS EYES!!! 1:10

  • Facial expressions is not the key to show your emotions in playing a piece..

  • Making monkey faces doesn't mean you are giving an interpretation of the piece....especially one like this Appassionata Sonata......

  • The more I watch him, the more I see he's sitting far too close to the piano, and he's way too tense.

  • Lang Lang is overrated

  • Bunch of jealous muthafuckas at 1:26-1:31

  • If he plays it prima vista, its quite good.

  • 00:17 to 00:18 someone says "Shite" :L

  • 09:55 i can play better than him

  • That's actually not very well played. Spectacularly maybe. But definitely forgettable.

  • @TommyHaegin couldn't agree more

  • @TommyHaegin can you play it any better?

  • @TommyHaegin Barenboim doesnt think so :(

  • @TommyHaegin so he played spectacularly, but at the same time not very well? hmmm...

  • i hate how they smash the piano!! NEWS FLASH, it sounds crap!.........out.

  • His playing is nonpareil. And I feel like I'm seeing the real Lang Lang, devoting all his attention to his playing rather toward cheesy showmanship. I play the Appassionata, which makes me appreciate his taste, the maturity of an elder like me. Alas, he plays far better than I do.

  • Lang Lang is so virtuoso he uses two fingers(4,5) on black keys.

  • Lang Lang is a piano god. But even the piano god has a god, Barenboim

  • @thoushallbepwnd barenboim missed less notes. doesnt that say it all?

  • @thoushallbepwnd I see here a case of dyslexia... Thoushallbepwnd clearly typed god instead of dog and thus I sincerely advise a trip to your doctor. Lang Lang/Bang Bang is no member of a musical pantheon. He is a dog of the piano, barking and growling upon it as he is wont to do, all the while wagging his tale as those with no understanding of musical artistry pat him on the head and scratch behind his ear. I suggest a scratching with a trepanning knife in the hope that some taste may seep in.

  • @thoushallbepwnd But even the god or the piano's god, Barenboim has a god, Argerich.

  • @babysbk They really thinks that thing named Lang Lang is a concert pianist... ahahahahaah

  • @babysbk Can you believe this??? People here don´t know what "irony" means!