Added: 3 years ago
From: nassr110
Views: 8,765
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (212)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • until they find a bone in the south pole, then they will say we came from there. just a educated guess.

  • 400,000 years of evolution and adaptation to different environments...this is where the whites come from!

  • Then where do white people come from...

    This just prove that white people are shape shifting, reptilian, Atlantean descendant... Black and black does not equal white

  • @vicksmoka You need to read more....

  • @Jazzman5456 read more what? ti bef

  • Comment removed

  • Absolutely the lamest, most pathetic, most retarded up load that I have EVER SEEN!!!...

    Without a doubt some afrocentrist, child minded negroid that thought that by simply up loading this repetetive GARBAGE, it will solve the problem for negroids that: Evolved Humanity first Appeared in Eurasia and not Africa, that the Egyptians are Caucasian and not negroid, that all the Races that created Civilization share Neanderthal DNA and negroids do not have it... And that negroids skipped evolution.

  • let me ask them something, : Were you there at that time, seeing people emigrate from the current region of Africa? God made sure it happened just how it happened; there is nothing else we can say about something we know nothing about. Or else, prove history & show me the truth about the cave painting of the horse in France; yes, now i believe you. . . not!. It's a mystery from the past ages and for ages to come.

  • you can not say that we came from africa because what is africa it is just a giant land mass but people just gave it a name so really you cant say that we came from africa but that we came from a giant land mass in this planet that we people call Africa

  • Africa? Research Mesopotamia.

  • They are completely obsessed with us.

  • what utter crap!black ppl are just as genocidal as some white ppl. just read & watch the news. there is always women & children getting butchered somewhere in Africa. Our so-called "african ancestors" probably killed off other ppl some 100thousand years ago, so that we have no trace of humanities REAL ancestors.

  • @TheLemurian1 lol

  • Whatever mutant

  • A team led by Andrea Manica at the University of Cambridge, England, compared over 6,000 skulls from more than 100 ancient human populations. The research discovered a loss of genetic diversity the farther away from Africa people lived.

    This supports the single origin, or "out of Africa" theory that states early humans colonized the Earth after spreading out of Africa some 80,000 years ago.

  • there is no such thing as the ''black race'' the color of your skin has to do with the amount of sun light your getting

  • @actoman1 Race is probably one of the most arbitrary things in society today. Modern anthropology sees this as one of its principles, and is one of the things Darwin said in Descent of Man. He too found that splitting up the human species into races was utterly stupid, and that you could have any number of "races" with in it.

  • @Macabre215 Human beings (homosapiens) are a species, not a race. :) , There are races.

  • @Macabre215 Humans are not a race, it's different Genotypes like Caucasoids, Mongaloids, Australoids and Negroids. Several races, cultures and nationalities are what has always made up the Human species.

    Humans were never slit up, we are who we are today because of nature, Marxist PC beliefs are not natural in nature, they are political in nature.

    The 'Out of Africa' theory is just that, theory, not fact, it's since been disproved also because the oldest Human remains were light skinned in Asia.

  • @Calengela "Humans are not a race..." I agree and never said otherwise.

    "...Marxist PC beliefs..." Marxism has nothing to do with what I talked about. You're yelling communist or nazi to think you win an argument. I stated that the lines between races in the human species are arbitrary when considering the type of ethnocentric view applied to it. Location and culture is fine but sometimes it goes too far

    "...is just that, a theory, not fact..." You're ignorant of what a scientific theory is.

  • @Macabre215 You should listen to the black Afrocentrists, they would disagree with you enormously there, they believe they are godly people because and that melanin is God's dust.

    White people are an entirely different Genotype from Negroids, that is fact, that wasn't determined by location or culture was it? Colour is only one element that defines racial deference, the Caucasoids are evolved from a different species, not just race that was native to the Northern and Western parts of the world.

  • @Macabre215 People who have a Marxist view on race tend to believe in mixing with other Genotypes and mass multiculturalism, which is not a good thing, just as the Negroids don't want it either, that's why they don't view Barrack Obama as Black even though his skin is clearly blacker than it is Whiter - again proving that race is not just about skin colour.

  • for those who don't believe dna don't lie my friend i believe this

  • "all races came from the Black race"

    AkA

    All races evolved from the black race as blacks evolved from apes.

  • I really doubt this. I have my own opinions , this doesn't explain all the missing links.

  • @jesusaurus09 beats the other story where the guy opened the sky and a chick was created from a rib

  • chimpanzees are your ancient ancestors...

  • Yes i knew i was black :))

  • Please stop being childish and petty everyone. This has nothing to do with race!

    If there is one message to take from this, it is that we are all more closely related to each other than we ever realized. We might look different now but we share the same ancestory.

  • then the ones found in Africa they'll change it to that country so it's really nothing substantial because the remains that was found and carbon dated and DNA tested was from Africa now when they find older remains somewhere else we will all come from there. I just think all this is funny...lol

  • Comment removed

  • Man did not come from Africa or what some people think that everyone came from black people, wrong, man evolved on the land which is now called Africa and that's still only a theory and the only reason it's even a theory is because Africa just happen to be where they found the oldest human remains so they changed it because before they said mankind came from Africa they was saying mankind came from somewhere in Asia, so basically when they find human remains in some other country that are older

  • @Ingle92protege You believe that mormon crap, are you deaf or did you not just hear that white man say humans came from africa.

  • The black man is the first man.

  • @Ingle92protege and adam and eve from arabia

  • hm...hard to believe since im east asian.....well...i guess i shuold be happy eh?

  • @milad2007halo3 you have right because we came all from ARABIA.

  • Next you can google:

    Non-human primates and see for yourself that governments, scientists and universities world wide accept that the human is a primate. Non-human primate? So,WTF is a HUMAN primate. Oh, that would be YOU and me!

  • The DNA proves we are ALL primates:

    Youtube search:

    The short version:

    Ken Miller on Human evolution

    The long version including the collapse of ID/creationism-2hrs:

    Ken Miller on Intelligent design

    Human chromosome #2 and #4:

    Generation and annotation of the DNA sequences of human chromosomes 2 and 4,Nature 434, 724-731 (7 April 2005)

  • well krazy koko ur obviously abit of a JACKASS and HALFIDIOT I made no disrespectful remark to you what I stated is a fact so look in to it and shut your behind

  • Your info is incorrect the oldest man is found in Asia

  • @jazzlicka gosh ur a moron

  • everything good comes from africa

  • @tierra399 Like HIV?

    Nah, just kidding. But seriously (to the uploader), who gives a crap? Stop hating everyone who's not of "teH BlaCK RaCe". Moron.

  • @Nomiss9 ur a fuckin retard everything good as in everything beautiful if you never been there and are judging from what you see on t.v then you have no right to comment.

  • @tierra399 I said I was kidding about the HIV thing. Fuck you, you fucking racist asshole.

  • @Nomiss9 LOL I don't think racist is the word...but whatever

  • @tierra399 LOL and I think you overreacted, since the only thing I said to YOU was a fucking joke, and I never even said anything about it not being beautiful or whatever. The uploader IS a racist, check out his other videos if you haven't already.

    But whatever. ;D

  • @tierra399 Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha­haahahhahahahahahahahaha! that's funny aids and all types of diseases came from Africa. Destruction, like Black people came from Africa where's the good stuff? there is none.

  • Old Info

    We Came From East Africa

    Which Consider To Be Sudan Or Somalia

    But If U Think More

    The Red Sea Which Spread Yemen And KSA (Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia) From Africa Is Not That Old

    So According To The Bible We Came From The Heavens Of Adan Which Is Located On The Map In Yemen and Yemen By That Time Was In East Africa

    So Easily U Can Say Humans Started In Yemen East Africa

    But Anyway If We Started From Africa Asia Or Europe Or Even The Americans Who Cares We All The Same ''HUMANS''

  • Just because we all came from Africa doesn't suggest which race came first, that cannot be proven yet.

    Blacks make the unproven assumption that if we came from Africa then we must have all been black first. There's no proof of which race was first on this planet.

  • @wetweasel56 If the first man originated in europe what race do you think he would have been?

  • than why has a recent study saying that a skull was found in china that predated the oldest one found in Africa.. that fact is life started everywhere not just "Africa" and if life did start in Africa than how is it that Europe and Asia are far more advanced and yet Africa is still in its primal stages

  • @RAHOWASKIN

    excuse me, asshole. we have kindgoms. we are not primitive

  • @Dramactica mud huts are not kingdoms :) 

  • Yes they are.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @RAHOWASKIN Uh, actually, "mud huts" are a form of early architecture that required forethought, material gathering, community organizing and design & function... the very foundations of technology and civilization. So, you're actually wrong on this. But then again, you knew that before you posted your insipid comment. You flat-assed, Pale Africans are something. That's alright because your numbers are decreasing and ours are increasing... soon you'll go the way of your Neanderthal precursers.

  • take that you racist fucks LOL

  • The synopsis of this video is false. The white man is (also) the original man.

    It's so simple, this is a scientific fact.

  • @Arkad26 The black man is your father.

  • hahaheheheh...may I come out & play wit ya'll?...been reading these comments...sure sounds like fun ..:D Thanks for puttin tha whoop as* on those who have been askin for it for soooo long haha knowledge IS powa..

  • This was ages before black people or white people or asian people so some people in the comments should STFU

  • Pt. 3

    Report of the symposium on "The peopling of Ancient Egypt

    and the Deciphering of the Meroitic Script (Annex to Chapter 1. p.52, 3rd para.) Prepared by the International Scientific Committee's Rapporteur at the request of the Committee.GENERAL HISTORY OF AFRICA U.N.E.S.C.O.)

    Ancient Civilizations of Africa II Abridged ed. copyright 1981 publ.1990

    United Nations Educational Scientific & Cultural OrganizationInternational Scientific Committee

    for the Drafting of a General history of Africa

  • lrn2respond to the right person

  • Comment removed

  • Bullshiite:  DNA only proves races commingled it does not prove when the % of white, black, yellow, or red came into the picture or how. With the discovery of proto-humanoid in the Caucasus recently, the afro-centric originality has been put back.

  • Pt. 2 ......the first inhabitants of the Nile Valley belonged to THE BLACK RACE, AS DEFINED BY BY THE RESEARCH FINDINGS CURRENTLY ACCEPTED BY SPECIALISTS IN ANTHROPOLOGY AND PREHISTORY........ONLY PSYCHOLOGICAL AND EDUCATIONAL FACTORS PREVENTED THE TRUTH OF THIS FROM BEING ACCEPTED."

  • Pt.1

    "Negroid Grimaldian man appeared about-32,000. Cro-Magnon man, THE PROTOTYPE OF THE WHITE RACE, ABOUT -20,000, Chancelade man, the prototype of the yellow race, in the Magdalenian period, about -15,000. The Semitic races were a social phenomenon characteristic of an urban environment and were a cross between the black and white races.

  • the bullsh*t 'find' in the Caucasus means nothing,just another attempt by insecure whites to place the birth of mankind OUTSIDE of Africa,even if they have to lie or fabricate evidence to do it and trust me eventually they will, they have a DOCUMENTED HISTORY of doing so. REMEMBER PILTDOWN MAN?He turned out to be FAKE planted by British Geologist Charles Dawson.They (whites) falsely tried to make it appear as if man began in Europe. X-ray spectrometer confirmed the hoax. This is white behaviour.

  • In your stupid lou gates afro-centric dreams. If whites hadn't brought you to western world you still be in the jungles murdering each other wait you still are.Using your misguided thought process let's see what happened, blacks started everything made cities and then said fuck it we are going back the jungle and live like animals again. Dumbass. Back to a normal school. Where you have to maintain a grade average and not pass because your lying your ass off..Caucasus man is 1.5mil

  • You as*hole...hahaha...1.5million isnt even cutting it close. In Africa you're going to have to beat 3 mil. Grimaldi Negro mentioned in the post below is just one of the final sequences of blacks (Modern homo sapien) who exited Africa and went down into Europe. He's not the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th or 5th sequence of man in Africa. Man has 6 sequences idiot and the complete sequence is only found in Africa. Your Caucasus find doesn't even begin to appraoch the 3rd sequence. Keep grasping at air.

  • One more thing dunce....even your Caucasus man would be black idiot.....the black race POPULATED the entire planet long before the existence of the luecoderm (the prototype of the white race) came into existence. Already a conclusive SCIENTIFIC FACT. The problem with you young white supremasts is that you don't know which argumants are conclusively closed and which are not. You want to argue about things that are no longer in the ralm of argument....but this is 'white hope' . Get the facts 1st.

  • Pt.1

    Report of the symposium on "The peopling of Ancient Egypt

    and the Deciphering of the Meroitic Script

    (Annex to Chapter 1. p.43,3rd para.)

    Prepared by the International Scientific Committee's Rapporteur at the request of the Committee.GENERAL HISTORY OF AFRICA (U.N.E.S.C.O.)Ancient Civilizations of Africa II Abridged ed. copyright 1981 publ.1990 United Nations Educational Scientific & Cultural OrganizationInternational Scientific Committee

    for the Drafting of a General history of Africa

  • Pt. 2

    "Since the Upper Paleolithic period , the initial homogeneity of the human race had gradually declined; the population of Egypt was neither more nor less homogeneous than the populations of other parts of the world. The FIRST APPEARANCE of the HUMAN RACE OCCURRED IN AFRICA 5,300,000 YEARS B.P. THE ORIGINS WERE AFRICAN.

  • good luck dip sh*t

  • Pt.2

    "There was really NO EUROPE in ancient times......and Europe as we know it was divided by the Rhine-Danube frontier, south and west of which lay the civilized provinces of the empire, and north and east the ''BARBARIANS' of whom the civilized world KNEW ALMOST NOTHING"

    A HISTORY OF THE MODERN WORLD

    R.R. Palmer (Prof. Yale University)

    and Joel Colton (Prof. of History at Duke University)

  • Pt.1

    "After the Greeks (and thus the Romans) were CIVILIZED BY THE AFRICANS IN EGYPT most of what we now know as 'Europe' was still barbaric, and unheard of."

  • Hey 'Boukephalos1' are your credentials greater than that of R.R. Palmer (Prof. Yale University)and Joel Colton (Prof. of History at Duke University)....if not....I think we'll take them at their word with respect to the quote below...oh and hahahahahahahahahahahahahahhah­ahahahahaha

  • Absolutely, you see you don't have to remember what you have said if you say the truth.

  • what the hell are you talking about?

  • It must have been a BAD MOON RISING DAY for you knownothingatall. Lost culture discovered in Balkans

    Long before Egypt rose from the Nile, before Ancient Greece enlightened the world, and before the Romans rose to claim the lands around the Mediterranean. Dating to before 5000 B.C. along the lower Danube Valley in the Balkans a lost civilization flourished. There history starts sometime around 6200 B.C.

  • Oh and they weren't black. More likely proto-Greek.

    Your shit does stink doesn't it.

    Wonderful doing business with you. Now don't cry.

  • Not interested in your opinion....if you notice ...ALL of my posts list checkable REFERENCES & SOURCES, something your posts LACK. So until you provide those...EVERYTHING YOU SAY IS BULLSH*T BECAUSE IT'S JUST YOUR OPINION WHICH DOESN'T HOLD ANY WEIGHT HERE. I've posted no opinion of mine....only checkable SOURCES. try again and come correct or dont come at all clown.

  • "Racial differentiation took place in Europe, probably in southern France and in Spain, at the end of the last Wurm glaciation, between 40,000 and 20,000 years ago. We understand now , because of the above- cited facts, why the first inhabitant of Europe was the Grimaldi Black man, who was responsible for the first lithical industry of the European Upper Paleolithic period called Aurignacian industry."

    CIVILIZATION OR BARBARISM:

    AN AUTHENTIC ANTHROPOLOGY

    Cheik Anta Diop

  • Did you know the telephone was BLACK?

    Drop dead funny.

    Anyway your over and out, and destroyed. Now pass 1st grade and then come back and speak to me.

  • Sure they were knownothingatall, then they said FUCK IT WE IS GOING BACK TO THE JUNGLE. And they did.

  • Pt.2

    "Marcellin Boule and Henri- Victor Vallois insist on the fact that the localizing layers of the Grimaldians are always in direct contact with those of the Mousterian period in which the last Neanderthal lived; in other words, there is no other variety of Homo sapiens that precedes the Grimaldi Negroid in Europe or in Asia.

  • Pt.1

    "The Grimaldi Negroids have left their numerous traces all over Europe and Asia, from the Iberian Peninsula to lake Baykal in Siberia, passing through France, Austria, the Crimea, and the Basin of Don, etc. In these last two regions, the late scholar Mikhail Gerasimov, a scholar of rare objectivity, identified the negroid type from skulls found in the Middle Mousterian period.

  • @knowitallification, they found those skulls there because whites used to hunt blacks for sport and would take their heads for trophies.

  • ok 'Bullsh*tphalos1' ...when people are looking defeat in the face all they can do is make wisecracks....hell that's all they got....I aint mad at that....guess i can understand....you don't have any FACTS or E.V.I.D.E.N.C.E. to compete with on this level...ok sure...understandable. DESTROYED!!!! (smile)

  • You are FOOL and black afro-centric idiot. Your stupidity knows limited references but unfortunately for you those references mean nothing. So you can cry to your BLUE in the face. Negroes were never Egyptians, Europeans or Greeks. They were only black Africans that came out of the jungle as slaves and haven't made a thing of value in Africa only becoming something when they reached America in the 20th Century. I will say afro-centric studies has helped your ego and that's all.

  • So 'Bullsh*tphalos1' ... those are your 'scientific documented facts with checkable references'? If so...we 'black savages' dont have any thing to worry about if mental midgets like yourself are all we have to worry about....you know why? No one takes you seriously....your girl, your mother, your boyfriend......no one...not even you....you don't even take yourself seriously...so...GOOD-BYE. You couldnt answer back competently so you just posted your nervous breakdown....loved it !!!

  • Delete it knownothingatall. They are laughed at by all.

  • So are you telling me the Greeks were not the students of the Ancient Egyptians...am I making that up....is that just more ......'Africancentered bullsh*t'?

  • NO they didn't and No Greek acknowledges your afro-centric fairytale. You're only worth pity now.

  • Pt.1

    "The most brilliant of the GREEK STUDENTS of science, such as Thales of Miletos (C.600 BC), Democritos, Pythagoras, and Eudoxos (408-355 BC.) travelled to EGYPT TO STUDY. Seneca tells us that Eudoxos had to go to Egypt to STUDY PLANETARY MOTION;

  • Don't cry 'Bullsh*tphalos1'.....I know it hurts......everybody on this page LAUGHING AT YOU. But I'm not....I have sympathy for your pathetic Greek freak a*s. Learn History boy.

  • And this one is for my comrade 'dfolks15' hold'n me down:

    "As for Plato he seems to have SOUGHT IN EGYPT TO LEARN both geometry and theology, and of the priestly knowledge in general"

    OLYMPIODORUS, LIFE OF PLATO

  • No baby!! I release you. Fly On The Wings Of Ra. They don't know nothing about that, huh. Hee, hee, hee, hee.

  • yo dfolks15....we owe them this onslaught of HISTORICALLY DOCUMENTED F.A.C.T.S......theyve had this a*s whuppin cum'n for a loooong time feel'n me? Trust me....they are not on our level...the Ancestors prepared us.

  • Oooo you give me chills. Youz a BAD man. Don't hurt them too much, too quick. Let them suffer nice and slow. I'll get the popcorn! LOL

  • dass how its goin down

  • I heard that

  • "In going through the Ancient Greek texts, one cannot escape the idea that in the eyes of these old authors EGYPT WAS THE CRADLE OF ALL KNOWLEDGE AND ALL WISDOM. The most celebrated among the Hellenic wise men or philosophers crossed the sea to SEEK initiation into NEW KNOWLEDGE" THE PRIEST OF ANCIENT EGYPT (Grove Press: Distr. by Random House) Serge Sauneron, Director of the French Oriental Archaeological Institute in Cairo

    Dont you feel stupid 'Bullsh*tphalos1'? You should, I would.

  • I'm saving the good stuff for you 'Bullsh*tphalos1' (smile). Go get some help....I'll be here waiting...with 'ammo'.

  • No African centered stuff here.....I quoted no one black.....now whats your excuse? I know you got one...losers always do hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha­h....take that BLACK phone out your a*s and you might win an argument idiot hahahahahahahahahahahaha

  • laugh'n? I don't know about that.....from my youtube mail I'm getting you might wanna change your tune....should I post the mail I'm getting from Greek college students here in NYC who are thanking me for answering questions they've long wondered about?

  • Hey fam, what's up KNOWITALL, I got you! To all the haters trying to play my brother, why don't you GOOGLE "EVERYONE'S GENEALOGICAL MOTHER", yes I'm your mother, and the page you come to, look for where it says, "SEARCH INSIDE THIS ISSUE". Then type "EVERYONE'S GENEARLOGICAL MOTHER, click search, then click on the words you just typed, and read about your BLACK AFRICAN MOTHER'S DNA = Damn No Ancestors!!!! LMAO, hee hee, holla back!

  • Hey 'dfolks15' ....'Boukephalos1' (better known as 'Bullsh*tphalos1') said emphatically that the Ancient Greeks NEVER studied under the Ancient Egyptians and that they were NEVER students of the Ancient Egyptians......watch me destroy his Greek fantasy.

  • Oooo Knowledge!! Make my day.

  • Pt.2 and at that time EGYPT MUST HAVE BEEN THE WORLDS LEADING CENTER OF ASTRONOMY. Pythagoras (6th century BC.) SPENT NO LESS THAN 22 YEARS IN EGYPT STUDYING ASTRONOMY GEOMETRY, AND THE MYSTERIES"

    Physics Professor, J. Pappademos

    University of chicago at Illinois

    Sources Cited: 1) A HISTORY OF SCIENCE-George Sarton  2) GREEK GEOMETRY- G.T. Allman

  • Boy...it sure got quiet over in 'Bullsh*tphalos1's corner......guess he don't wanna come and out play no more with the Africancentrists.....tsk tsk tsk....we were enjoying humiliating him. Sure hope he comes back....got some special 'stuff' for 'im (smile).

  • That was fun KNOWITALL! Love seeing you at war. We have to do this more often huh, hee, hee, hee, hee, hee, hee, hee.

  • yeah ...you see that little b*tch 'Boukephalos1' aint makin a f*ck'n peep. I think he got a head ache....his small brain has never seen FACTS before...hahahahahahahahah. Crushed his little fantasizing Greek freak a*s,

  • Excuse me coward you stopped writing to save yourself an embarrassing comeback. Let's face it you're not much of a challenge.

  • @Boukephalos1 KNEEL TO YOUR AFRICAN FATHER HAHAHAHAHAHA BOW DOWN NEANDERTHAL.

  • @rotena25 Egyptians were not black african according to Zahri Hawass, head curator of Egyptology in Egypt. They weren't Arab either.

  • Pt.3

    "If one bases one's judgement on morphology, the first white appeared only around 20,000 years ago:: the Cro-Magnon Man. He is probably the result of a mutation from the Grimaldi Negroid due to an existence of 20,000 years in the excessively cold climate of Europe at the end of the last glaciation"

    CIVILIZATION OR BARBARISM:

    AN AUTHENTIC ANTHROPOLOGY

    (Chapt.1, p.15 & 16 para.2 &1)

  • @knowitallification, don't believe everything you read.

    Cro-Magnon man was far too developed and far more advanced than the blacks of that time. Blacks have not evolved yet and whites evolved first from pre-homo sapiens. Sorry, but you need to just look in the mirror and see how close you are to your ape ancestors.

  • @wetweasel56 Black man is the original man neanderthal blood having white man.

  • @knowitallification yes someone whose smart.... "whites,asians,hispanics" today evolved as they spread out over time. climate changed their apperances. simple. technically theres no such thing as race.

  • @knowitallification

    Nice try, that man is Afrocnetrist, he is about as credible as racist White anthropologists in the early 20th century. "An authentic Anthropology" ? LOL, Self proclamation does nothing. You are going to have to better than recycle the same books by Diop that you have memorized.

    P.S., And Grimaldi man has been proven to be of a developing Cro-magnon man, not of a supposed "Negroid". This was covered by National Geograhic's "Genographic" program a while back.

  • @homsar678

    'Proved' by who? A white paleontologist? You dismiss black scientists based on the fact that they are black....but I'm supposed to s*ck the dick of a white scientist because his whiteness makes his proclomation correct? You can continue to suck it for me.

  • @knowitallification

    Right back at ya, I said he was as credible as white Eurocentrist. I said nothing about s*cking anyone' c*ck, you did. Perhaps you like to mention that sometimes ? I listen to people who are actually tenored in their position of study.....not some idiot who wrote things for aggrandizement. LOL, and a white paleonologist ? National Geographic is inter-racial.....anyone who is learned enough can write for them. Besides, they are up to date, Diop is not.

  • @homsar678

    Mental midgets like urself R under the false impression that the designation

    'up-to-date' is synonomous with 'correct'.Unfortunately 4U it is not. What's correct has always been correct & what's false has always been false & always will B. Pythagorus lived between the 6th & 5th century BCE yet the theorum he is credited with 'introducing' 2 the world is still taught in every academic institution in the world. Things R not invalidated by default because of their antiquity.

  • @knowitallification

    LOL, That is because the Pythagorean Theorem is actually proven, unlike Diop who has had his claims disproven.(Not all of them though, but he is still unreliable for the things he claims). And before calling me a mental midget, please spell coherently and not like a pre-teen who substitutes "you" with "U".

  • @homsar678

    I dismantle your assumed premise for what you qualify as 'validation' and the best you can do is attack my colloquial grammar? I obviously don't have much to worry about from you. If you research Diops academic background you'll find he was more 'tenored' than all of the 'feeble minded' academics you suscribe to put together. Einstein not outdated.....but Diop outdated. Yeah Ok. Newton not

    outdated but Diop outdated...yeah ok. So I guess being white means 'up-to-date'. NOT.

  • @knowitallification

    No, I didn't just attack your grammar, I can already tell your just ready to jump on me after I challenged you on Diop. And feeble minded ? National Geographic is actually pretty reliable, and I didn't even mention specific scholars like you said, who are you kidding ?

  • @homsar678

    In any case, what's your point? Let's say we remove Grimaldi man from the 'black equation', are you implying that whites did not descend from black Africans? If so please expound on their origins.

  • @knowitallification

    The origin of man is from Africa. We can both agree on that. As for skin color, we don't know for sure....Khoisan people have the oldest genetic markers in the world, but you don't see them being pitch black.

  • @homsar678

    What idiot intimated that being 'pitch black' was a criterion for being Black?

    Jay Z, Chris Brown, hell even Nelson Mandela are not 'pitch black'....but any idiot knows theyre still BLACK. So please.....tell me, what is your thus far 'mute' point?

  • @knowitallification

    Black ? They don't have black skin....so how are they black ? You mean idigenous African ? Yes. You should go to Africa, Many of the people there don't consider themselves "black" as many African Americans do. I have visited South Africa, and the indigenous Africans there don't take that aparteid crap, they would never take on the label the whites have given them. I have also visited Sudan, now they consider themselves black in some areas, so there are exceptions to that.

  • @homsar678

    This conversation is done. I don't dialogue with retards.

  • @knowitallification

    Haha, you are such a clown. When I expose your blatantly flawed understanding of race, you resort to calling me a retard. Don't flatter yourself, the only retarded person is you because you like aggrandizement through your skin color......you're pathetic. Until you actually go to Africa, and know that all people there don't considered themselves "black Africans", you will still be an insignificant racialist.

  • @homsar678

    Like I said I don't talk to retards unless I see their about to hurt themselves or someone else. You apparently are a retard. Number 1, I'm Ghanaian. #2 Everyone reading this post should google the image of 'Khoisan'; then come back here and tell 'homsretard678' that they are indeed BLACK PEOPLE. And Australian Aboriginals are referred to as 'Black Fellows' in their own country asshole....ask them. Like I said....I avoid talking to retards as they waste my time.

  • @knowitallification

    Oh, everybody can look up Khoisan and they will find that the majority of them are not black, they are tan. And like I said before, there are exceptions to the "black" label. Again arrange a trip to Africa. Some Australian Aboriginals do refer to themselves as "black", that is why I said there were exceptions to the rule. If you were born in Ghana by any chance, you would realize that they have names for shades, not black. A "Brooney" would be a lighter skinned native.

  • @homsar678 I looked them up and they look black to me. Go to the wiki site, they have a picture there and that man is black.

  • @knowitallification

    And everybody who googles Khoisan, will now consider how nervously insecure you really are. They often are not black, nor do they refer to themselves as black.

  • @homsar678

    But the fact still remains that everybody who googles 'khoisan' will know what a f*cking retard you are. You are one of those white retards who thinks anyone not 'PITCH BLACK' is black. I guess Richard Pryor was NOT BLACK. I guess Diana Ross is NOT BLACK. I guess T.I. is NOT BLACK. I guess Will Smith is definitely NOT BLACK. I guess Beyonce is NOT BLACK. I guess the Rev. Jeremiah Wright with his high yellow ass is NOT BLACK...you stupid dumbf*ck....we even come in

    WHITE= Albinism.

  • @knowitallification

    Since I haven't had the time to respond to your illogical fallacies, I will now: 1.) Regardless of how black somebody is, it doesn't mean they will refer to themselves as black. Just watch this video of native Zimbabwe people discussing skin color : watch?v=MXbjTiAq_9A.

    2.) I couldn't even believe that you were that foolish to refer to me as white. I am not white, but I am of mixed-European descent(Italian, Polish, Welsh, French, Scottish).

  • @knowitallification

    3.) With all those people listed, since many African Americans refer to themselves as black, I would not be surprised they would call themselves that. But that doesn't mean anyone else of African descent is to be held of that notion that they are "Black African ".

  • @knowitallification

    Ugh.....Khoisan are not black NOR do they refer to themselves as black. All Africans have different perceptions of themselves of who they are and what they have. Get out of that stupid American Urban delusion of "Black African". I have probably been to more African countries than you have and to boot had more relationships with African people

    .

  • @homsar678

    You f*cking ass hole....I am an African....Relationships with one? Try having an African family. What a f*cking idiot

  • @homsar678

    Better yet...try being an African you f*ckig wannabe. My family is all over the f*cking continent you white mutant albino europoid; Try Ghana, Mali, Niger, Sierre Leone, Nigeria, South Africa , Ethiopia and the Sudan. Cousins , brothers , sisters. Aunts, uncles. nephews and nieces. You sound like you wanna be one of us soooo bad. Soooorrry. It just doesn't work that way. Why dont you go on a Eropean trek and stay in your cold barren backyard. assshoooooooole fa real.

  • @knowitallification

    LOL ! Your blatant deterioration gets more amusing every time, now you resort to calling me me wannabe because I have basically proven you wrong about racial identity. You are a clown. Try actually visiting Africa, I could care less if you have relatives there, because I bet they don't all call themselves black. And you are the moron because you haven't supplied anything to your your claims. I have though through the video.

  • @knowitallification

    You need serious help psychologically.

  • @knowitallification Haha I am an albino mutant ? I thought African people could be albino ? I guess because of that statement and your rhetoric, Africans are mutants too ! No I don't think that, but your so inconsistent with your statements. Again, you are totally deluded to think I am white, I am not. But I am European, and all races have genetic mutations. Like albinism.

  • @homsar678

    "The Khoisan people of the Cape region were the first inhabitants European navigators came across after Africa was circumnavigated towards the end of the 15th century. The original San hunter-gatherer groups lived on this land for approximately 100 000 years before the arrival of OTHER BLACK PEOPLE...."

    Ancient people of the land

    The Khoisan People

    Ok asshole....the San were incorporated by the Koisan....notice the term,

    "OTHER black people" .... I know, you still dont get it.

  • @knowitallification

    "Khoisan (also spelled Khoesaan, Khoesan or Khoe-San) is a unifying name for two major ethnic groups of Southern Africa.[2] Historically, they have been referred to as the Capoid race because they can be visually distinguished from most other sub-Saharan Africans by way of their relatively lighter skin color and their epicanthic folds"- Wikipedia

    Move along and stop wasting MY time.

  • @homsar678

    fuck that, they just look like light skinned south Africans, fuck all other bullshit.

  • @NoRiddlez

    I agree they are light skinned, and they are Indigenous. But they are not black. Period. Just like how Europeans have different shades, but they are still Europeans.

  • @homsar678.

    Your entitled to your opinion, there light skinned black south african people they still have black south african features

  • @homsar678

    You crackkahs live in a fantasy world trying to define a whole race of people who existed millions of years before your race was even a thought. What's worse is your arrogant enough to try and define us for ourselves as if your obsolete opinion held any weight. F*cking pathetic. Waste somebody else's time....please.

  • @knowitallification

    I have never defined anyone, your the one obsessed with clasifying every African as Black. You have too much pychological projection to be taken seriously.

  • @knowitallification

    Don't waste my time with your stupid opinions of what people refer to themselves. No Native African cares that you think that they are all "Black" because they all have different names for themseves. Just wawtch the video I posted, you seem very silent on that anyway ;)

  • @homsar678

    You are officially the dumbest whhite person on youtube.

  • @homsar678

    And likewise, pitch Black or not....the Khoisan, are Black African people.

  • @knowitallification

    So if I am very tan, does that make me black ? Because the Khoisan are tan, so by your rhetoric than, I should beconsidered black. BTW, Just because they are from Africa doesn't mean they are "Black" anyway. By your standards, Australian Aboriginals must be Black Africans.........just because they are dark skinned.

  • @knowitallification, then why don't all white people have large lips and protruding asses?