I'm into landscape and nature photography ,i have Nikon 16-35mm, do u think getting 11-16mm is a good idea , what other lenses with excellent IQ u could recommend to me ..thanks
Why not the 11-16 for landscape? What makes it worse for that than the other for that purpose? If it´s just as sharp and wide? AND you can use it for wide angle low light too??
hi mate, that was very helpful thanks alot..but still confused which 1 should i buy ...i like to do night photography like outdoor ones on streets and cityscapes and star trails and stuff.. sope wot do u reckon? plz would like to know it from you as you have them both.
why buy 2 different lenses for 2 different puroposes? where I live the difference in price is 50€ so thats not the reason. And from your reviews I can see that they are both as equaly sharp when stoped down.Why not just buy the 11-16(which is 16-24mm in FF) and have a fast allround ultra wide lens. I really dont see the point in buying the 12-24mm just becouse it has a longer reach, especialy when alot of people have kit lenses that are quite sharp at 24mm at f8-11..or did i miss sometihng?
what would you say would be best for shooting video on a green screen? i wanted to get the 11-16 but saw a review from dslr noob and he mentions and shows a little distortion when at 11 mm i have a small garage(where i green screen) and my 18-55 even at 18 isn't wide enough. is the 11-16 for me?
Which one of these has the most chromatic aberration? Or maybe rather, which one of these do you have to do the most work on afterwords? (I'm shooting raw)
QQQQcon which of the 2 lenses is sharper at f22? I would want everything from immediate foreground to the back in focus. Did you try the new tokina 12-24mm with THE build in motor het?
@UnderLineFilms The latest version of the 12 24 has got a motor inside the lens and will do autofocus on a body such as the d3100. If you get the older version or the 11 16, you may also use manual focus, which is not hard at all, since the dof is very large in this focal range.
would you say that if you were confident enough in the ISO capabilities of the body you were using a 12-24 f4 on that you could achieve near the low light performance of the 11-16 f2.8 , within the same range?
@sumitino the 11-16mm will always have a one stop advantage no matter what camera you use it on. For most lighting conditions the 12-24mm is fine, even low light.
Your presentation and information is totally awesome, but it's a bit difficult to hear at times. It's also a little hard to see when visually presenting the product. Just a little more light would be great. Thanks though for the information and presentation. I have been thinking about getting a Tokina lens. And after watching a few of your videos I have no more doubt about getting one after a live demonstration.
and one more thing I am an emerging photographer in the philippines and I would love to see your insights about my wok and your comment would be appreciated. I'm really on a very tight budget when it comes to equipment. I live by the day but photography is a passion I wouldn't give up for anything. Thanks dude!
thanks for replying! nice vids very helpful!!! i have an additional question. Why do I always have to crop my pics when printing 8X10, it's pretty annoying cause I love to compose my photos and print them as they appear? I'm using CS4. Could the image size in menu field would help? And one software best to use to make a presentation I find imovie pretty bad even if i chose HD? thanks dude!
Thanks for thie review. I have a Tokina 12-24 and I use it with my nikon D7000 and it creates a really great shots. But when I saw this Tokina 11-16 wiht much higher aperture i started thinking to sell my 12-24 and get this 11-16. But nowafter watching your review i decided to just keep my 12-24 and buy 16-11. Thanks :)
Thanks, I'm interested in lens with manual aperture rings. Yes they are even more interesting to me if they include both Chip and AF modes but those applications are not as important as being able to control my aperture manually. Might you mention this in one of your vids or direct me to a site that offers listings or additional information, concerning manufactures and available models. They will be used mainly on D40X & D90 bodies. Thanks again!
hi there! i really like how the 11-16mm and the 14-24mm are the same f/2.8. can u make a video or can u just answer which one is better? thank you in advance!
Good review. I want to take up more landscape photography so im searching for a lens. I'm trying to decide between the tokina 11-16, tokina 12-24, and sigma 10-20 f3.5. This video is really helping me lean towards the tokina 12-24. I like the fact that it has a more versatile zoom range, but the f4 bugs me especially when i see the tokina 11-16 f2.8 right next to it.
@ithree6mafia Dude I know a bunch of people who shoot exclusivly at night..their is such a thing of "low light photography" just cuz your view is different doesn't mean others see it that way..
"if your into low light photography" that doesnt really make sense. you cant be into it, you get the lens if your in low light situations or if want a creamy blown out background. good review though.
Great video man. I am very interested in this lens but i cant decide which one to get, either this or the Canon 16-35mm f2.8, I have a crop frame cam the T1i. Is the Tokina good for portrait?
first thanks for your very usefull reviews.. second How do we know that lens is full area focus at F8 ?? for the tokina 11-16 ? why isnt it f10 or 5,6? and how we can know this thing about any other lens.. thanks
@QQQQcon Congratulations, you really managed to find the most important difference between these two lenses. :-)
I own both, and for landscape, I always use the 12-24mm, which is much more versatile.
The 11-16mm on the other hand, with its huge depth of field even at f/2.8 and the low minimum speed it requires for hand held shots is really good for hand held night photo.
HI, I'm a new photo enthusiast and have been following your reviews. Just some clarification comparing your review with the Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 lens. Based on both reviews of 12-24 f4 and 11-16 f2.8, the images are tack sharp at f8 on both. Why then we have to by a 12-24 when the 11-16 can also the job with an advantage of good low light capability? I have a stiff budget, what lens do you think is best between the 2?
thanks for this thought it was me who noticed the difference between these 2 definitely going to get these two lenses, was wondering if you knew any website to get lenses at a decent price which ships to the UK i got my Nikon 10.5mm f2.8 Fish eye for $550 but got charge another $200 to collect it from the post office so i rarely shop around ebay for lenses anymore
@kidshuffle I have a comparison with all of those lenses and the nikon 10-24mm as well called ultra wide angle DX lens comparison, check that out first and then let me know if you still have questions
@QQQQcon yerp seen all of the reviews. very clear and straight forward. made me understand that every lenses has their own pros and cons. just need an honest opinion from you since you've experienced all of them first hand.. thanks bro :)
@kidshuffle my opinion is to get the tokina 11-16mm if you do a lot of low light photography or the tokina 12-24mm if you dont do alot of low light photography.
@QQQQcon yerp seen all of the reviews. very clear and straight forward. made me understand that every lenses has their own pros and cons. just need an honest opinion from you since you've experienced all of them first hand.. thanks bro :)
thanks for this. watching the separate reviews of each lens did not really clarify what i wanted to know, but, now i know. Can't wait to get the 12-24mm
@CURTKURT24 Most of my money I make through these videos and advertising but I make money through workshops too. I also win contests every now and then and also sell a few pics here and there.
I'm into landscape and nature photography ,i have Nikon 16-35mm, do u think getting 11-16mm is a good idea , what other lenses with excellent IQ u could recommend to me ..thanks
EgamiPhotography 1 week ago
@EgamiPhotography 16-35mm is plenty good for landscape, you dont need another wide angle lens.
QQQQcon 1 week ago
Why not the 11-16 for landscape? What makes it worse for that than the other for that purpose? If it´s just as sharp and wide? AND you can use it for wide angle low light too??
Unsgaardsgade 3 weeks ago
Good review.,,, I chose on T116 over T124....
idontknowlo 1 month ago
hi mate, that was very helpful thanks alot..but still confused which 1 should i buy ...i like to do night photography like outdoor ones on streets and cityscapes and star trails and stuff.. sope wot do u reckon? plz would like to know it from you as you have them both.
aron740 1 month ago
@aron740 11-16mm is best for low light
QQQQcon 1 month ago
@QQQQcon
thanks mate have ordered 1 on ebay .
aron740 1 month ago
what's the matter with your right leg ? :D
RicaMOfficial 1 month ago
@RicaMOfficial habit, almost always starts happening when I sit down.
QQQQcon 1 month ago
@QQQQcon I'm just kidding bro :)
RicaMOfficial 1 month ago
why buy 2 different lenses for 2 different puroposes? where I live the difference in price is 50€ so thats not the reason. And from your reviews I can see that they are both as equaly sharp when stoped down.Why not just buy the 11-16(which is 16-24mm in FF) and have a fast allround ultra wide lens. I really dont see the point in buying the 12-24mm just becouse it has a longer reach, especialy when alot of people have kit lenses that are quite sharp at 24mm at f8-11..or did i miss sometihng?
pykos2 1 month ago 2
very helpful, thanks dude
mastergoodmarta 2 months ago
what would you say would be best for shooting video on a green screen? i wanted to get the 11-16 but saw a review from dslr noob and he mentions and shows a little distortion when at 11 mm i have a small garage(where i green screen) and my 18-55 even at 18 isn't wide enough. is the 11-16 for me?
GhettoPunktual 3 months ago
@GhettoPunktual distortion is a lot better with the 11-16mm
QQQQcon 3 months ago
which of the two would be the better choice if say i was using it for available light landscape shooting??
would the 11-16 be a good choice for landscape as well?
thanks!!!
justinlow1990 3 months ago
@justinlow1990 if you use a tripod I would still probably go for the 12-24mm but that is just me. If not the 11-16mm is a good choice
QQQQcon 3 months ago
Which one of these has the most chromatic aberration? Or maybe rather, which one of these do you have to do the most work on afterwords? (I'm shooting raw)
TheOats 4 months ago
@TheOats 11-16mm will have the best performance.
QQQQcon 4 months ago
QQQQcon which of the 2 lenses is sharper at f22? I would want everything from immediate foreground to the back in focus. Did you try the new tokina 12-24mm with THE build in motor het?
4Patat 5 months ago
@4Patat probably the 12-24mm but doubt it is a big difference
QQQQcon 5 months ago
Great review. Thanks
youcraigtube 5 months ago
tnx man, ill buy the tokina 11-16 f2.8..very well said bro
iannecarlo02 5 months ago
@UnderLineFilms The latest version of the 12 24 has got a motor inside the lens and will do autofocus on a body such as the d3100. If you get the older version or the 11 16, you may also use manual focus, which is not hard at all, since the dof is very large in this focal range.
teundilles 6 months ago
your such a nice kid Conner.
BadZav 6 months ago
@BadZav thanks, i try
QQQQcon 6 months ago
Comment removed
latemfreak 6 months ago
can i use tokina 11-16 on d3100 using manual focus....
latemfreak 6 months ago
@latemfreak yes
QQQQcon 6 months ago
@UnderLineFilms the tokina 12-24mm version 2 will work but the tokina 11-16mm and version 1 of 12-24mm wont.
QQQQcon 6 months ago
would you say that if you were confident enough in the ISO capabilities of the body you were using a 12-24 f4 on that you could achieve near the low light performance of the 11-16 f2.8 , within the same range?
sumitino 7 months ago
@sumitino the 11-16mm will always have a one stop advantage no matter what camera you use it on. For most lighting conditions the 12-24mm is fine, even low light.
QQQQcon 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey nice vid! I recommend this lens too!
Check out my vid of it also here: /watch?v=Z7B2D_P_s6Q
Good job dude!
TehHelpStation 7 months ago
Thank you. Please continue to produce informative videos.
luvmnms 7 months ago
@S8OR yes I do, the range of the 12-24mm is much better for landscape photography
QQQQcon 7 months ago
Gj, but get a mic :)
mmdbidstrup 8 months ago
Your presentation and information is totally awesome, but it's a bit difficult to hear at times. It's also a little hard to see when visually presenting the product. Just a little more light would be great. Thanks though for the information and presentation. I have been thinking about getting a Tokina lens. And after watching a few of your videos I have no more doubt about getting one after a live demonstration.
Thanks again
Jrorion8 8 months ago
and one more thing I am an emerging photographer in the philippines and I would love to see your insights about my wok and your comment would be appreciated. I'm really on a very tight budget when it comes to equipment. I live by the day but photography is a passion I wouldn't give up for anything. Thanks dude!
benedictsalvacion 8 months ago
thanks for replying! nice vids very helpful!!! i have an additional question. Why do I always have to crop my pics when printing 8X10, it's pretty annoying cause I love to compose my photos and print them as they appear? I'm using CS4. Could the image size in menu field would help? And one software best to use to make a presentation I find imovie pretty bad even if i chose HD? thanks dude!
benedictsalvacion 8 months ago
@benedictsalvacion because your camera sensor is 2 x 3 format not a 4 x 5 format, meaning that you have to print 8 x 12 in order to avoid cropping.
QQQQcon 8 months ago
12-24mm is best for portrait as well isn't?
benedictsalvacion 8 months ago
@benedictsalvacion yes, better than the 11-16mm
QQQQcon 8 months ago
GOOD JOB!!!
decas115aaf 8 months ago
Thanks for thie review. I have a Tokina 12-24 and I use it with my nikon D7000 and it creates a really great shots. But when I saw this Tokina 11-16 wiht much higher aperture i started thinking to sell my 12-24 and get this 11-16. But nowafter watching your review i decided to just keep my 12-24 and buy 16-11. Thanks :)
jaoski2002 10 months ago
hi there i have a canon 500d with the standard 18-55. and then a 70-200 4l.
and i wanna have a new wide angle what would you pick?
FrodoF95 10 months ago
Thanks, I'm interested in lens with manual aperture rings. Yes they are even more interesting to me if they include both Chip and AF modes but those applications are not as important as being able to control my aperture manually. Might you mention this in one of your vids or direct me to a site that offers listings or additional information, concerning manufactures and available models. They will be used mainly on D40X & D90 bodies. Thanks again!
CAJUNNSC 11 months ago
Hi there,
Have you ever used Tokina 16-50 f2.8. If yes what is your opinion on it?
Vtold1978 11 months ago
@Vtold1978 I am afraid not
QQQQcon 11 months ago
does these tokina lenses AF on my d3100 ?? help !! :)
ninjaboyteen 11 months ago
@ninjaboyteen only the tokina 12-24mm version 2 can
QQQQcon 11 months ago
@QQQQcon but i can manual focus on it right ?? (11-16 )
ninjaboyteen 11 months ago
@ninjaboyteen sure can
QQQQcon 11 months ago
@QQQQcon nice video! can you please make a review in tokina 16-28mm f2.8 for nikon d700. ty!
Jepraw 11 months ago
hi there! i really like how the 11-16mm and the 14-24mm are the same f/2.8. can u make a video or can u just answer which one is better? thank you in advance!
pinoykillah18 11 months ago
Good review. I want to take up more landscape photography so im searching for a lens. I'm trying to decide between the tokina 11-16, tokina 12-24, and sigma 10-20 f3.5. This video is really helping me lean towards the tokina 12-24. I like the fact that it has a more versatile zoom range, but the f4 bugs me especially when i see the tokina 11-16 f2.8 right next to it.
OwningGeezer 1 year ago
@ithree6mafia Dude I know a bunch of people who shoot exclusivly at night..their is such a thing of "low light photography" just cuz your view is different doesn't mean others see it that way..
Mozo901 1 year ago
"if your into low light photography" that doesnt really make sense. you cant be into it, you get the lens if your in low light situations or if want a creamy blown out background. good review though.
ithree6mafia 1 year ago
@ithree6mafia what do you call night photography?
Low light photography is pretty much when you are using the lowest ISO and longer exposures
OneTrackMinds 1 year ago
14mm canon prime is good if you want EXTRA quality
KypHeM 1 year ago
Great video man. I am very interested in this lens but i cant decide which one to get, either this or the Canon 16-35mm f2.8, I have a crop frame cam the T1i. Is the Tokina good for portrait?
arnoldgd84 1 year ago
first thanks for your very usefull reviews.. second How do we know that lens is full area focus at F8 ?? for the tokina 11-16 ? why isnt it f10 or 5,6? and how we can know this thing about any other lens.. thanks
maqdesy 1 year ago
@QQQQcon Congratulations, you really managed to find the most important difference between these two lenses. :-)
I own both, and for landscape, I always use the 12-24mm, which is much more versatile.
The 11-16mm on the other hand, with its huge depth of field even at f/2.8 and the low minimum speed it requires for hand held shots is really good for hand held night photo.
Anthelix00 1 year ago
HI, I'm a new photo enthusiast and have been following your reviews. Just some clarification comparing your review with the Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 lens. Based on both reviews of 12-24 f4 and 11-16 f2.8, the images are tack sharp at f8 on both. Why then we have to by a 12-24 when the 11-16 can also the job with an advantage of good low light capability? I have a stiff budget, what lens do you think is best between the 2?
Thanks for the help....
dokgold 1 year ago
the 11-16mm is the best lens out there today (imho) for anyone into nightsky, star trails, milky way etc... long exposure photography at night...
i don't own one yet.. but will very soon to stick on the end of a D7000..
moonboots69 1 year ago
thanks for this thought it was me who noticed the difference between these 2 definitely going to get these two lenses, was wondering if you knew any website to get lenses at a decent price which ships to the UK i got my Nikon 10.5mm f2.8 Fish eye for $550 but got charge another $200 to collect it from the post office so i rarely shop around ebay for lenses anymore
Kmendoza7 1 year ago
hey there,
would like your honest opinion bro.
sigma 10-20, tamron 10-24, tokina 11-16 and the tokina 12-24.. between the four 3rd party lenses.. which suits me most?
i am doing weddings, outdoors/landscaping and a lil bit of video.
am using a nikon d90.
thanks :)
kidshuffle 1 year ago
hey there,
would like your honest opinion bro.
sigma 10-20, tamron 10-24, tokina 11-16 and the tokina 12-24.. between the four 3rd party lenses.. which suits me most?
i am doing weddings, outdoors/landscaping and a lil bit of video.
am using a nikon d90.
thanks :)
kidshuffle 1 year ago
hey there,
would like your honest opinion bro.
sigma 10-20, tamron 10-24, tokina 11-16 and the tokina 12-24.. between the four 3rd party lenses.. which suits me most?
i am doing weddings, outdoors/landscaping and a lil bit of video.
am using a nikon d90.
thanks :)
kidshuffle 1 year ago
@kidshuffle I have a comparison with all of those lenses and the nikon 10-24mm as well called ultra wide angle DX lens comparison, check that out first and then let me know if you still have questions
QQQQcon 1 year ago
@QQQQcon yerp seen all of the reviews. very clear and straight forward. made me understand that every lenses has their own pros and cons. just need an honest opinion from you since you've experienced all of them first hand.. thanks bro :)
kidshuffle 1 year ago
@kidshuffle my opinion is to get the tokina 11-16mm if you do a lot of low light photography or the tokina 12-24mm if you dont do alot of low light photography.
QQQQcon 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@QQQQcon yerp seen all of the reviews. very clear and straight forward. made me understand that every lenses has their own pros and cons. just need an honest opinion from you since you've experienced all of them first hand.. thanks bro :)
kidshuffle 1 year ago
Isn't the focus and the zoom in reverse?
It seems as though it is. If it is, is it possible to get a normal one, or get something additional to function normally?
MichaelFrymus 1 year ago
thanks for this. watching the separate reviews of each lens did not really clarify what i wanted to know, but, now i know. Can't wait to get the 12-24mm
Thanks
nerxboy 1 year ago
How do you get money from there videos?
owendart 1 year ago
Wow a d3x? Thats insane, are you going to make a review of it?
3GBlog 1 year ago
@3GBlog yep should be up soon
QQQQcon 1 year ago
Comment removed
3GBlog 1 year ago
@QQQQcon Damn, jealous. How do you afford all your high quality equipment?
CURTKURT24 1 year ago
@CURTKURT24 make money and save save save.
QQQQcon 1 year ago
@QQQQcon Haha not so easy on a grocery bagger's salary
CURTKURT24 1 year ago
@CURTKURT24 it would be impossible on a salary like that, I make my money through photography.
QQQQcon 1 year ago
@QQQQcon Tell me about it. I do have a few paid photo gigs every now and then, but probably not nearly as much as you
CURTKURT24 1 year ago
@CURTKURT24 Most of my money I make through these videos and advertising but I make money through workshops too. I also win contests every now and then and also sell a few pics here and there.
QQQQcon 1 year ago
@QQQQcon Ah, very cool
CURTKURT24 1 year ago