First, look at the T-K barrier, it is full of a irdium. You know what that means? Metiorite! Secondly, a globle flood have very obivious features. I did a video series on that. Third, I am doing a series on the pangan roots of Judahism. So stay tuned. Four, I did video on flat earth. Look for the redux. Its much better than the old one. Fifth, I am going to do a series on the historicity of the NT.
Your god said the earth was created in six days and there was a globle flood, your god said the earth was flat. Your god cast out demons to cure dieases. Your religion is nothing but man made. Your holy book is not relible on anything it says. So I can say.... NOT YOUR GOD.
I agree with that. However we can prove many Gods do not exist, but not all possible Gods. The christian God is described in the bible as both never changing and sometimes changing, or "P and not P, at the same time" which is a formal contradiction and the only impossiblility, all else is possible. The burden of proof lies on those claiming something is true, and atheists do not when they say they "believe there is no God".
Disproving Johovia is simple as opening a soda can. However, theist or better the christian has no intentions of proving his god and expects me to believe or disprove. 100% of the time the onus is put on me, while they make all the stupid ass claims. It gets triering. So saying "I do not believe because lack of evidence" is not a cop-out but an expection for them to take on the burend of proof as they should.
"God exists", either you believe this to be true or you believe it to be false. A lack of belief is a copout you use to avoid the burden of proof, which you misunderstand since there is no burden on a belief, only on claims of truth.
The sheep among atheists say "I lack a belief in God", as they simply parrot those who are too confused to realize no such burden exists for a belief that there is no God.
You lack belief in Ra, Odin, Thor, Venus, Bramha, Krishna, and The FSM. Why do I have to Disprove your god? I cann't prove a negative. Why cann't you prove your god? You believe in him, there fore there must be evidence. So put up or shut up.
I am a strong atheist, who just showed you why there is no burden of proof on an atheist saying "I believe there is no God", as beliefs are not proven by definition. The sheep reiterate what they've been told without thinking about it, there is no logic to saying we are what we are not.
No, a srong atheist says "I KNOW there is no god." The weak atheist says I believe... Whatever "crusade" you have agaisnt weak atheist I suggest you come off it. I sorry that you veiw your fellow atheist as sheep or parrots, but frankly I don't give a shit.
I should have said "I am strongly atheist", since the distinction between strong/weak atheism only exists if you mistake atheism for what it isn't. In any case, it is still false to say atheism is what it is not, and that is what you are saying. To do so to weasel away from a burden of proof argument that doesn't even apply is to misunderstand the burden of proof argument as well.
Atheists do not have any burden of proof (unless they say gods are impossible). It is up to theist to prove the point. Not for us to disprove it. I am weary from all the theists trying to get me to disprove their god, while they do nothing.
You are an idot!!!
johnhwilliams 10 months ago
@johnhwilliams
Ah, did I just rape your idol?
TheAtheistPaladin 10 months ago
your face did not agree with what you said at all
Zatheify 1 year ago
I got to 2:32 seconds before this guys inability to complete a sentence wore on my nerves.
VideoOutlawz 4 years ago
watch?v=hUnu9NZEXq4
TheAtheistPaladin 4 years ago
First, look at the T-K barrier, it is full of a irdium. You know what that means? Metiorite! Secondly, a globle flood have very obivious features. I did a video series on that. Third, I am doing a series on the pangan roots of Judahism. So stay tuned. Four, I did video on flat earth. Look for the redux. Its much better than the old one. Fifth, I am going to do a series on the historicity of the NT.
TheAtheistPaladin 4 years ago
Your god said the earth was created in six days and there was a globle flood, your god said the earth was flat. Your god cast out demons to cure dieases. Your religion is nothing but man made. Your holy book is not relible on anything it says. So I can say.... NOT YOUR GOD.
TheAtheistPaladin 4 years ago
Gaps in knoweledge is not a good arugment for anything, including a god. Thats why there is a "god-of-the-gaps fallcy".
TheAtheistPaladin 4 years ago
Not your god.
TheAtheistPaladin 4 years ago
I agree with that. However we can prove many Gods do not exist, but not all possible Gods. The christian God is described in the bible as both never changing and sometimes changing, or "P and not P, at the same time" which is a formal contradiction and the only impossiblility, all else is possible. The burden of proof lies on those claiming something is true, and atheists do not when they say they "believe there is no God".
gklr 5 years ago
Disproving Johovia is simple as opening a soda can. However, theist or better the christian has no intentions of proving his god and expects me to believe or disprove. 100% of the time the onus is put on me, while they make all the stupid ass claims. It gets triering. So saying "I do not believe because lack of evidence" is not a cop-out but an expection for them to take on the burend of proof as they should.
TheAtheistPaladin 5 years ago
"God exists", either you believe this to be true or you believe it to be false. A lack of belief is a copout you use to avoid the burden of proof, which you misunderstand since there is no burden on a belief, only on claims of truth.
The sheep among atheists say "I lack a belief in God", as they simply parrot those who are too confused to realize no such burden exists for a belief that there is no God.
gklr 5 years ago
You lack belief in Ra, Odin, Thor, Venus, Bramha, Krishna, and The FSM. Why do I have to Disprove your god? I cann't prove a negative. Why cann't you prove your god? You believe in him, there fore there must be evidence. So put up or shut up.
TheAtheistPaladin 5 years ago
I am a strong atheist, who just showed you why there is no burden of proof on an atheist saying "I believe there is no God", as beliefs are not proven by definition. The sheep reiterate what they've been told without thinking about it, there is no logic to saying we are what we are not.
gklr 5 years ago
No, a srong atheist says "I KNOW there is no god." The weak atheist says I believe... Whatever "crusade" you have agaisnt weak atheist I suggest you come off it. I sorry that you veiw your fellow atheist as sheep or parrots, but frankly I don't give a shit.
TheAtheistPaladin 5 years ago
I should have said "I am strongly atheist", since the distinction between strong/weak atheism only exists if you mistake atheism for what it isn't. In any case, it is still false to say atheism is what it is not, and that is what you are saying. To do so to weasel away from a burden of proof argument that doesn't even apply is to misunderstand the burden of proof argument as well.
gklr 5 years ago
Atheists do not have any burden of proof (unless they say gods are impossible). It is up to theist to prove the point. Not for us to disprove it. I am weary from all the theists trying to get me to disprove their god, while they do nothing.
TheAtheistPaladin 5 years ago