it seems history is repeating itself....fed has won a grand slam since his kids were born and is it cos of his kids......man oh man.....what would I give to see Federer win against Nadal in the French once be4 Fed calls it a day.....btw Federer is better than Sampras in my book cos he won the French...sampras made it to the semis once in what like 15 attempts....only borg and lever would be ahead of Federer at the moment as far as the greatest players ever in the history of the game.....
andre said in his book sampras was dull...well u bald headed drugie sampras used to whip ur ass in tennis n i think thatz y u were pissed...n sampras wz far more interestin tennis player n entertaining n federer said he was inspired by sampras n not agassi n thatz y he has a one handed backhand...agassi is just another jeolous pig
You obviously haven't read the book.. Andre speaks highly of Pete several times. However, he tries to communicate his real feelings toward every event and person as they actually were. It's called Open, so for him to just be polite and suck up to everyone involved in his tennis career would be hypocritical.
Everyone I know that has read the book has come away with more appreciation and respect for Andre.
Pete's the man!! Roger Fakerer is great on slow courts,but Pete owns him on fast courts!! Sampras kicked Federer's ass in a couple of exhibition matches too, and they weren't screwing around either!
Fuck you!! Dumb Moron! Federer never won on real grass! Wimbledon is no longer real grass. It's now artificial turf grass, because the British rigged the surface to be slow! They hate Pete, because he beat Tim Henman! Even you can figure that out!
I know that Wimbledon uses turf not real grass. People think Roger is a fast court expert. that's a joke. The fastest surface he can play on is the US Open hard courts. He's a great player, but not on real grass.
You're a misinformed idiot. They switch the grass to perennial rye, which is not "turf", it's a slower form of grass. Do your research before you start running your fat fucking mouth.
@DanimalLawlz yes but lost in the next round so that win didn't mean anything plus it was a tight 5 set match which could've gone either way! Had they met more than once then I think Pete would've had more success than losses!
@pps1fan I agree. I think sampras is a playa who figure out how to beat somebody. I think had it been sampras of 93-97 it's unlikely he would of lost to federer. Even the current federer best in 2004-07. I pick sampras over him on fast grass all the time.
Shows you how weak of a talk show host Leno is when a tennis player is funnier than he is. Pete never said he didn't want his parents to be in the crowd but Leno said that. Pete simply said that they don't watch because they get so nervous. It's like Leno was listening to himself rather than his guest.
Pete's relationship between his mind and body has not become a reality. He suffers from a mind / body illness. Mentally, he's illness is based on delusions of grandeur, and his body is not holistic because his relationship with tennis is with one arm. It's down hill from there. I'm sorry I have to be the one to make this known. I'm hopeful that can heal Pete as well as the sport as a whole.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
From my perspective, his relationship with tennis and the money he made has no connection to reality. How do you equate value to winning a tennis contest? There is no educational value. Pete represents a source of pointless and meaningless knowledge. I'm sorry that I have to be the one to point out the pointless.
He doesn't represent anything pointless or meaningless knowledge! He is a role model in the sense that he achieved all his success through hard work and determination and did it with humility, dignity and class! He was never motivated by the money side of things...he was motivated by the history of the game! He turned down so many lucrative sponsorship deals during his career which so he could've made even more money but he chose to focus on tennis!
I'm sorry to inform you and Pete that tennis has been in a dark age. Are you aware that you can become enlightened, through the means of tennis? If and when you can realize that reality, you will realize the reality of tennis' current dark age. From my perspective, you and Pete don't know that you don't know that you're victims of this current dark age.
You are a very disturbed individual...I and I am sure Pete Sampras and many others who are involved or follow tennis do not need the kind of enlightening you speak of & Tennis is not in the Dark ages nor it's current players for that matter! I'd appreciate it if didn't respond to me anymore...let's just agree to disagree because we will never agree on this matter!
I was so in love with this guy when I was a teenaged girl. But now talking from his beauty....well a little bit shrunken. But still the best player ever!!!!
Federer is somewhere below Pete and where Nadal will be soon at the moment bu I think he could become second best after Nadal and maybe better than Pete but Nadal is always in the way of him breaking the grand slam records. Its a shame. If only Nadal had not come alnong so soon Federer could have become a legend.
agreed, the agassi rivalry and friendship eventually was so fun. Rafael is practicing again. I stopped playing myself for 2 months because I felt uninspired with him out. Played again today. Can wait to see Rafa running around like a crazy bull again.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
listen you fucking mother ducking cock sucker son of a whorey bitch ass. For me, djokovic is the greatest of all time (or will be the greatest of all time). After that sampras, then borg, then mcenroe, then connors, then laver, then paoucho gonzalez then agassi, then federer, then nadal. Fuck you whore sucking dick
i don't think so pete nearly beat him at msg he had federer lack of match fitnes otherwise he would have beaten roger lets not forget sampras is 10 years older than federer and retired from tennis since 2002
I dont see how people keep on using that as an example of how good Pete is. If i recall correctly, he got absolutely raped by a nobody on the Challenger circuit before the exhibitions. I saw it as almost obvious that Federer was going easy on him and him wearing a watch while playing is symbolic of that.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Overall the tennis was better then, but truth be told: Federer and Nadal would dominate every player from the 90s even in their prime such as Pete, Agassi and Boris.
federer barely beat pete and pete is 12 years older. you're clearly retarded. 7-6, 7-6 was one of the matches. sampras is a geezer and federer...over a decade younger and well trained has trouble beating a bad kneed rusty sampras... are you mad? reverse the roles. federer over a decade older and a 26 year old sampras...the scores would be 6-0, 6-0 asshole
after djokovic. Are you fucking retarded? djokovis isn't even in the top 50. Sampras would have destroyed him. hell, mcenroe,connors,agassi,edberg,becker,federer,nadal, and the list goes on and on.
you are right. Nadal is putting Federer in his place, second best. Just as Pete would have done. Roger had an easy run until Nadal came along with a challenge and Federer crumbled in 2008 after 3 years of watching Nadal beat him. People forget Nadal has been beating Federer for years not just since Wimbledon 2008.Pete would have done the same and it would have been great to see Pete vs Nadal. Forget little Roger, He had it easy. Problem is once he goes, Nadal is going to go unchallenged really.
Totally agree with you there...until Nadal who really challenged Federer in his Grand Slam victories?? Pete Sampras had so much more competition when he won his 14 Grand Slams! I'm loving seeing Federer made to sweat finally! Nadal's so deserving of his success because he's earnt it through sheer hard work and determination!
smoke much crack do you? nadal wouldnt even be able to play with the old rackets and strings. federer would be very good but wouldnt dominate like he has. please tell me how nadal would return a sampras serve and an agassi return of his weak serve. its obvious u were born after sampras and agassi's prime
i disagree. I think Nadal would take he aproach he took ever since he changed to become a left handed player. He would have to adapt his game but he has the talent you can't deny him that. He has been defeating Federer for years now. Look at the head to heads. People have become comfortable having Federer as the all time great to talk about and support but Nadal has won more than Federer did at the same age. Why people are blind to the statistics and the talen I just do not know.
Pete, train like you never trained before, make a comeback like Jordan did. Become a new man by shaving your head and getting a tan. You have trimmed down , now start building yourself back up, then Brigitte can give you Thai massages when youre recovering! The whole world misses the way Mens Tennis was back in the 90s and tennis today is dominated by the women. Train for the US Open , a la Jimmy Conners
I am your long lost greek cousin, check out my YouTube Channel, I get told I look like you all the time. Im 185cm and 185 lbs. Im a lefty though but I can recognize things. You looked really thin on Leno and thats good. I bet you can leap again like the old days. The way you can charge the net in only a few steps will catch everyone off guard. I noticed that these days people just play behind the baseline. You can charge the net now that youre thin again!
Pete, Brigette would support you to make a comeback. Show your kids what you do. Train as if you want to show Nadal a thing or two. I know you could whoop Roger if you were taking it seriously but you should train as if you are going to play Nadal because he is the future of tennis.
Fed looked like a complete wuss 10 minutes ago as he got embarrased by Nadal on Clay. He looked scared like a little boy. Hes the best ever, I dont think so. Pete is better and the 80s and 90s had alot of great players like Boris Becker, Jim Courier, Aggassi, Navratalova, o wait she was a woman, Rafter, Ivaniesavic, Stefan Edberg, Conners and Lendl and Chang. Who plays today?? Nadal and Federer.
Fed looked like a complete wuss 10 minutes ago as he got embarrased by Nadal on Clay. He looked scared like a little boy. Hes the best ever, I dont think so. Pete is better and the 80s and 90s had alot of great players like Boris Becker, Jim Courier, Aggassi, Navratalova, o wait she was a woman, Rafter, Ivaniesavic, Stefan Edberg, Conners and Lendl and Chang. Who plays today?? Nadal and Federer.
um k, thank you for responding to me. Yeah, honestly, I don't know anything of what I said. I was just talking. I did not follow tennis when Pete was playing.
leno is aterrible interviewer
rohitrez 1 week ago
it seems history is repeating itself....fed has won a grand slam since his kids were born and is it cos of his kids......man oh man.....what would I give to see Federer win against Nadal in the French once be4 Fed calls it a day.....btw Federer is better than Sampras in my book cos he won the French...sampras made it to the semis once in what like 15 attempts....only borg and lever would be ahead of Federer at the moment as far as the greatest players ever in the history of the game.....
kunvar25 4 months ago
ellsworth vines vs pete sampras. now that would be a match of historic proportions. sampras wins in a tight 5-setter, on each surface. beauty.
theatlantean2 1 year ago
Oh man! Damn. Six people in pinto for seven days. LOL.
SoulPowerful 1 year ago
Six people in a blue Pinto - in a move from Potomac Md? Since that's one of the richest cities in the country, something sounds fishy.
VeryEvilPettingZoo 1 year ago
andre said in his book sampras was dull...well u bald headed drugie sampras used to whip ur ass in tennis n i think thatz y u were pissed...n sampras wz far more interestin tennis player n entertaining n federer said he was inspired by sampras n not agassi n thatz y he has a one handed backhand...agassi is just another jeolous pig
godfaathr 2 years ago
@godfaathr
You obviously haven't read the book.. Andre speaks highly of Pete several times. However, he tries to communicate his real feelings toward every event and person as they actually were. It's called Open, so for him to just be polite and suck up to everyone involved in his tennis career would be hypocritical.
Everyone I know that has read the book has come away with more appreciation and respect for Andre.
drumsfightingandstuf 1 year ago
Pete's the man!! Roger Fakerer is great on slow courts,but Pete owns him on fast courts!! Sampras kicked Federer's ass in a couple of exhibition matches too, and they weren't screwing around either!
thisislaser 2 years ago
Fuck you!! your stupid and you have your eyes in your ass
Machieleke 2 years ago
Fuck you!! Dumb Moron! Federer never won on real grass! Wimbledon is no longer real grass. It's now artificial turf grass, because the British rigged the surface to be slow! They hate Pete, because he beat Tim Henman! Even you can figure that out!
thisislaser 2 years ago
Do you actually know anything?
dovestones 1 year ago
I know that Wimbledon uses turf not real grass. People think Roger is a fast court expert. that's a joke. The fastest surface he can play on is the US Open hard courts. He's a great player, but not on real grass.
thisislaser 1 year ago
Well there is a convulted answer that explains everything whilst proving nothing.
dovestones 1 year ago
You're a misinformed idiot. They switch the grass to perennial rye, which is not "turf", it's a slower form of grass. Do your research before you start running your fat fucking mouth.
DanimalLawlz 1 year ago 4
@DanimalLawlz who the fuck cares the
point is Federer never won on fast grass.
thisislaser 1 year ago
He beat Sampras in 2001 on fast grass.
DanimalLawlz 1 year ago
@DanimalLawlz according to John McEnroe you are wrong.
thisislaser 1 year ago
@DanimalLawlz yes but lost in the next round so that win didn't mean anything plus it was a tight 5 set match which could've gone either way! Had they met more than once then I think Pete would've had more success than losses!
pps1fan 1 year ago
@pps1fan I agree. I think sampras is a playa who figure out how to beat somebody. I think had it been sampras of 93-97 it's unlikely he would of lost to federer. Even the current federer best in 2004-07. I pick sampras over him on fast grass all the time.
Thutmosis7 1 year ago 3
i just wanna fuck pete sampras.. all this hair is making me soo hot
idolopinions3 2 years ago
i just love this guy!!!
NormanSawyer 2 years ago
Both in their prime, Sampras destroys this punk Federer.
theguvnorjimmy 2 years ago 2
@theguvnorjimmy oh definitely!
rob2804 2 years ago 2
@theguvnorjimmy damn right dude!!!
thisislaser 2 years ago
Andre's book is coming out this Nov. or so. Looking forward to that too...
jslovers 2 years ago
Shows you how weak of a talk show host Leno is when a tennis player is funnier than he is. Pete never said he didn't want his parents to be in the crowd but Leno said that. Pete simply said that they don't watch because they get so nervous. It's like Leno was listening to himself rather than his guest.
funlovingmonkey 2 years ago 16
yea well... i guess you can say that when ur one of the greatest
hellomonkey302 2 years ago
Six people and a bird in a Pinto! *LOL*
Pete's funny :)
woopa80 2 years ago
Comment removed
woopa80 2 years ago
LMAO 1:46
Did you fly across?
mohamz 2 years ago
Pete's relationship between his mind and body has not become a reality. He suffers from a mind / body illness. Mentally, he's illness is based on delusions of grandeur, and his body is not holistic because his relationship with tennis is with one arm. It's down hill from there. I'm sorry I have to be the one to make this known. I'm hopeful that can heal Pete as well as the sport as a whole.
Cheers!!!
mindbodyhealer 2 years ago
Start with healing yourself. You think you can heal Pete Sampras? I see delusions of grandeur in you man!
RafaeINadal 2 years ago
It is you that needs to seek help...what a load of crap you have just written there!
I've had the pleasure of meeting Pete Sampras and he is so down to earth and humble! He in no way has delusions of grandeur!
pps1fan 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
From my perspective, his relationship with tennis and the money he made has no connection to reality. How do you equate value to winning a tennis contest? There is no educational value. Pete represents a source of pointless and meaningless knowledge. I'm sorry that I have to be the one to point out the pointless.
Cheers!!!
mindbodyhealer 2 years ago
Sorry but you are way off the mark here!
He doesn't represent anything pointless or meaningless knowledge! He is a role model in the sense that he achieved all his success through hard work and determination and did it with humility, dignity and class! He was never motivated by the money side of things...he was motivated by the history of the game! He turned down so many lucrative sponsorship deals during his career which so he could've made even more money but he chose to focus on tennis!
pps1fan 2 years ago 12
pps1fan,
I'm sorry to inform you and Pete that tennis has been in a dark age. Are you aware that you can become enlightened, through the means of tennis? If and when you can realize that reality, you will realize the reality of tennis' current dark age. From my perspective, you and Pete don't know that you don't know that you're victims of this current dark age.
I hope this helps you.
Cheers!!!
mindbodyhealer 2 years ago
You are a very disturbed individual...I and I am sure Pete Sampras and many others who are involved or follow tennis do not need the kind of enlightening you speak of & Tennis is not in the Dark ages nor it's current players for that matter! I'd appreciate it if didn't respond to me anymore...let's just agree to disagree because we will never agree on this matter!
pps1fan 2 years ago
This age is getting even darker now that we have a black president. Cheers!!!
u229758 2 years ago 2
2:10 ... he is ridiculously good at that age...
Qboy316 3 years ago 2
I was so in love with this guy when I was a teenaged girl. But now talking from his beauty....well a little bit shrunken. But still the best player ever!!!!
luticia 3 years ago
until this guy called Federer came. But yes, Pete is awesome!
EricTheRed03 3 years ago
Federer is somewhere below Pete and where Nadal will be soon at the moment bu I think he could become second best after Nadal and maybe better than Pete but Nadal is always in the way of him breaking the grand slam records. Its a shame. If only Nadal had not come alnong so soon Federer could have become a legend.
RafaeINadal 2 years ago
Look where Nadal is right now...
copeland1983 2 years ago
I bought Pete's book today. Its worth a read despite who you are a fan of. Looking fwd to Roger's and eventualy Nadal's.
RafaeINadal 2 years ago 3
its a great book
pistolpete58 2 years ago
agreed, the agassi rivalry and friendship eventually was so fun. Rafael is practicing again. I stopped playing myself for 2 months because I felt uninspired with him out. Played again today. Can wait to see Rafa running around like a crazy bull again.
RafaeINadal 2 years ago
who cares
bigbossman999 2 years ago
I do because I am a fan and a tennis player and you do because you need someone to rip into when you are procrastinating at your computer (i.e. me).
RafaeINadal 2 years ago
Pete's the best
angrydonny 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
listen you fucking mother ducking cock sucker son of a whorey bitch ass. For me, djokovic is the greatest of all time (or will be the greatest of all time). After that sampras, then borg, then mcenroe, then connors, then laver, then paoucho gonzalez then agassi, then federer, then nadal. Fuck you whore sucking dick
fcshahzaib 3 years ago
if you think djokovic is the greatest of all time, you're a fucking moron, you don't know anything about tennis. idiot
maskchamp 3 years ago 7
haha, he must have been djoking
RafaeINadal 2 years ago
i don't think so pete nearly beat him at msg he had federer lack of match fitnes otherwise he would have beaten roger lets not forget sampras is 10 years older than federer and retired from tennis since 2002
themios72 3 years ago
I dont see how people keep on using that as an example of how good Pete is. If i recall correctly, he got absolutely raped by a nobody on the Challenger circuit before the exhibitions. I saw it as almost obvious that Federer was going easy on him and him wearing a watch while playing is symbolic of that.
jasoncho92 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Overall the tennis was better then, but truth be told: Federer and Nadal would dominate every player from the 90s even in their prime such as Pete, Agassi and Boris.
Purnis 3 years ago
smart comment, its good to see someone on these boards knows something about tennis
Reemaskain 3 years ago
federer barely beat pete and pete is 12 years older. you're clearly retarded. 7-6, 7-6 was one of the matches. sampras is a geezer and federer...over a decade younger and well trained has trouble beating a bad kneed rusty sampras... are you mad? reverse the roles. federer over a decade older and a 26 year old sampras...the scores would be 6-0, 6-0 asshole
CatLitterOne 3 years ago 7
Sure, Federer probably playing with a hangover and the nice guy he is, not wanting to humiliate the old guy in front of his countrymen.
Purnis 3 years ago
fuck you. Pete would kick federer's ass just like Nadal does. fed is great but lets just keep it at that. Sampras is the greatest after djokovic.
fcshahzaib 3 years ago
after djokovic. Are you fucking retarded? djokovis isn't even in the top 50. Sampras would have destroyed him. hell, mcenroe,connors,agassi,edberg,becker,federer,nadal, and the list goes on and on.
tommie66tx 3 years ago 5
I agree...Pete is the meat!
RafaeINadal 2 years ago
you are right. Nadal is putting Federer in his place, second best. Just as Pete would have done. Roger had an easy run until Nadal came along with a challenge and Federer crumbled in 2008 after 3 years of watching Nadal beat him. People forget Nadal has been beating Federer for years not just since Wimbledon 2008.Pete would have done the same and it would have been great to see Pete vs Nadal. Forget little Roger, He had it easy. Problem is once he goes, Nadal is going to go unchallenged really.
RafaeINadal 2 years ago
Totally agree with you there...until Nadal who really challenged Federer in his Grand Slam victories?? Pete Sampras had so much more competition when he won his 14 Grand Slams! I'm loving seeing Federer made to sweat finally! Nadal's so deserving of his success because he's earnt it through sheer hard work and determination!
pps1fan 2 years ago
Federer is the Best EVER!!!
HeartBreakKid1987 2 years ago
smoke much crack do you? nadal wouldnt even be able to play with the old rackets and strings. federer would be very good but wouldnt dominate like he has. please tell me how nadal would return a sampras serve and an agassi return of his weak serve. its obvious u were born after sampras and agassi's prime
robertk2007 3 years ago
i disagree. I think Nadal would take he aproach he took ever since he changed to become a left handed player. He would have to adapt his game but he has the talent you can't deny him that. He has been defeating Federer for years now. Look at the head to heads. People have become comfortable having Federer as the all time great to talk about and support but Nadal has won more than Federer did at the same age. Why people are blind to the statistics and the talen I just do not know.
RafaeINadal 2 years ago
No, Federer is better than Sampras.
HeartBreakKid1987 2 years ago
boris becker fancied himself really bad
dj6658 2 years ago
Pete, train like you never trained before, make a comeback like Jordan did. Become a new man by shaving your head and getting a tan. You have trimmed down , now start building yourself back up, then Brigitte can give you Thai massages when youre recovering! The whole world misses the way Mens Tennis was back in the 90s and tennis today is dominated by the women. Train for the US Open , a la Jimmy Conners
tdforbust 3 years ago
I am your long lost greek cousin, check out my YouTube Channel, I get told I look like you all the time. Im 185cm and 185 lbs. Im a lefty though but I can recognize things. You looked really thin on Leno and thats good. I bet you can leap again like the old days. The way you can charge the net in only a few steps will catch everyone off guard. I noticed that these days people just play behind the baseline. You can charge the net now that youre thin again!
tdforbust 3 years ago
Pete, Brigette would support you to make a comeback. Show your kids what you do. Train as if you want to show Nadal a thing or two. I know you could whoop Roger if you were taking it seriously but you should train as if you are going to play Nadal because he is the future of tennis.
tdforbust 3 years ago
Fed looked like a complete wuss 10 minutes ago as he got embarrased by Nadal on Clay. He looked scared like a little boy. Hes the best ever, I dont think so. Pete is better and the 80s and 90s had alot of great players like Boris Becker, Jim Courier, Aggassi, Navratalova, o wait she was a woman, Rafter, Ivaniesavic, Stefan Edberg, Conners and Lendl and Chang. Who plays today?? Nadal and Federer.
tdforbust 3 years ago
Fed looked like a complete wuss 10 minutes ago as he got embarrased by Nadal on Clay. He looked scared like a little boy. Hes the best ever, I dont think so. Pete is better and the 80s and 90s had alot of great players like Boris Becker, Jim Courier, Aggassi, Navratalova, o wait she was a woman, Rafter, Ivaniesavic, Stefan Edberg, Conners and Lendl and Chang. Who plays today?? Nadal and Federer.
tdforbust 3 years ago 3
agreed. Pete's a great guy.
I still think adjusting to marriage probably DID have something to do with his downfall.
backpage80 3 years ago
I disagree his "downfall" came after he had broken all the important tennis records so he might have just had motivation problems.
KaKui007 3 years ago
um k, thank you for responding to me. Yeah, honestly, I don't know anything of what I said. I was just talking. I did not follow tennis when Pete was playing.
backpage80 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
He is almost as good as Djokovic.
flipwarrior 3 years ago
Djokovic is my favourite player right now since the demise of Safin, but he just doesn't beat the GOAT, Pete Sampras.
If you were referring to his humour; well, I second what you say.
kasun4u2 3 years ago