Rmoney's dad = 1st MexicanAmerican (born in Chihuaha) to run for President
Mitt's family was so patriotic they fled to Mexico to evade US law
Mitt has many thousands of cousins (some still in Mexico) 'cause a few generations had 12 wives each
1 got shot by the husband of a lady that a Romney grandfather "married" (she was still married to another but since Mitt's line goes to a mormon apostle, he had god on his side till he got shot dead)
WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS THE WORST REPUBLICANS DID TO USA;
1) REAGAN MADE SOVIET UNION DISAPEARED AND OPEN EYES TO RUSSIA NOW THEY ARE BECOMING CAPITALISTIC COUNTRY?
2) BUSH WAS DRUNK MADE TWIN TOWERS COLAPSED, KILLED 3000 AMERICAN PEOPLE AND MADE THE WHOLE COUNTRY TO HAVE POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER, NOW EVERYBODY IS
PARANOID THANKS TO REPUBLICANS?
3) SPEND TOO MUCH TIME ON FUCKING LEWINSKY DRESS INSTEAD OF FOCUSING ON EUROPEAN UNION CREATED EUROS?
We've been made to fear the terrorists accept the erosion of our liberties. Our money is constantly being devalued. This financial crisis is being engineered, theres no other explanation for the things going on. The perpetual wars, and the increasingly invading police state. These are not conspiracy theory anymore they are fact. Ron Paul is our last hope to stop this 1 world government that is now being introduced to us as the solution by the mainstream media. Wake Up. the answer to 1984 is 1776
QUESTION FOR MITT ROMNEY: ARE YOU GOING TO END THE CRIMINAL FEDERAL RESERVE? ARE YOU GOING TO SHRINK THE USA GOV BY 50%? ARE YOU GOING TO CLOSE THE 900 MILITARY BASES AROUND THE WORLD AND BRING TRILLIONS HOME? ARE YOU GOING TO REOPEN 9/11 INVESTIGATION? ARE YOU GOING TO END THE SICK SEXUAL TSA? ARE YOU BRINGING THE TROOP NOW? RIGHT AWAY? ARE YOU GOING TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OR SHIT ON IT? IF NOT...PLEASE....MOVE AWAY AND LET DR RON PAUL BY IN CHARGE. RON PRESIDENT 2012
So what you're admitting is that you took his words and literally cut and pasted them into completely distorted lies--and you did this why?--the only logical answer is because you couldn't find anything real to criticize him with.
@TGNproductions24 -- As late as 2005 & 2006, Romney made jokes like this? "I believe marriage should be between a man and a woman … and a woman … and a woman," Romney quipped at the 2005 St. Patrick's Day breakfast in Boston. He made the same joke on Don Imus' 2006 St. Patrick's Day show. Romney's family tree has lots of polygamy. and his father was born in Mexico. He's currently trying to convince the Tea Party he's a good Christian who will reduce the debt.
Ron Paul/Jesse Ventura 2012 I'm Sick Of Seeing And Hearing The Same Old Shit From All These Phony Ass Lobby Paid Politicians Promising Change.Fucking bullshit! All These BushMongers And ObamaBots Are Running The United States Into The Ground! I'm Voting Ron Paul/Jesse Ventura 2012 I'm Sick Of The Lies And Unconstitutional Wars.
I agree he is the biggest liar that picture of him shaking the soldiers hand is propaganda when in his heart he loves his faith so another words anybody not Mormon is cast out
You have him saying that he approves of "violent, radical fundamentalism." and his goal is to "unite the world under a single military caliphate." and that he wants to stop intelligence.
You know those things are all true. In fact, he wants to fight against those who are violent extremists and stop a global caliphate. And he obviously wants more intelligence, not less.
Yes, he wants to monitor phone calls we make to Al Queida. So what?
Ha ha ha... no... let's take that comment point by point.
He wants to monitor calls Al Qaida makes. Can he monitor Afgan calls or Iranian calls? No. He can only push for monitoring the calls of Americans. Which is what he wants. First off, the very people in charge of intelligence gathering will tell you that it's not an effective form of intelligence gathering.
It's the whole reason we arrested those Middle Eastern men for buying cell phones in August of 2006.
The enemy may be unscrupulous, but they are not idiots. They know our calls are monitored. So they buy disposable cell phones. Seriously... this is news so old it was old in 2006, which was four years ago.
The core problem is that we're monitoring Americans who have done nothing wrong, and that's ILLEGAL. It's not my opinion. It's ILLEGAL.
Moving on...
He does support a violent, radical fundamentalism. The idea that we should invade Iraq, which he supported, proves that.
The entire invasion was a farce from beginning to end that has, according to the actual intelligence community, INCREASED the amount of terrorist activity. The CIA calls it "Blowback," based on a firefighting term they use as a metaphor.
Simply put, if you mess around with other countries, you can expect consequences. Some good. Some bad. The bad can often be predicted.
If you send troops to the Middle East to blow up towns and kill women and children (not on purpose mind you) then...
yeah... you can expect consequences. Like more terrorists. Plus, here's a news flash for you... Saddam Hussein HATED Bin Laden, Al Qaeda AND terrorists. He had them KILLED. Read up on the history of the area.
I would be remiss to paint that mad, brutal, bloodthirsty dictator as sympathetic so I won't, but if you think removing him from power and maintaining a military presence in the Middle East is a good idea, you might want to discuss it with all the generals and planners who resigned.
The sole reason Mutually Assured Destruction worked in the '80s was that both sides understood they would lose and did not want to die.
That doesn't really work against cultures that believe to die fighting a great evil is the greatest death bringing about a wonderful reward.
I'm actually not opposed to war, it may surprise you. I think our action in Afghanistan is justified and I propose we storm Turkey and Saudi Arabia as well to truly attack our enemy.
On 9/11, one third of the hi-jackers were Turkish and the other two thirds were Saudi Arabian. Turkey and Saudi Arabian governments openly fund and support Al Qaeda as well as a host of other anti-American terrorists groups and networks.
If you're truly interested in fighting terrorism, you need to increase funding to the CIA (with the caveat that we will monitor their actions more closely) and root out the source THERE
If you have no interest in that, or similar action towards those specific targets, then you have no interest in stopping anti-American terrorism.
Romney certainly isn't going that route, which exposes him for what he is: a liar, disinterested in the fundamentals of our free democratic republic in favor of jingoistic fascism.
@ebaofvn Having said that, we can't go to war with everybody. Nor do we want to use nuclear weapons on anybody. But we still have to make sure that we have nuclear weapons. If we were to unilaterally disarm, that would be a disaster because that would certainly leave us vulnerable to an attack.
That's why, just like with the Cold War, we need to have a strong nuclear arsenal. It's also important to have a strong SDI to defend against nuclear attack.
@ebaofvn Also, Iraq was a justifiable war. The fact that Sadam Hussein was not complying with the terms of the cease fire justified it. That was the real issue. We had suspicions, but no real way of knowing if there were WMDs until we went in.
It's the same principle if a cop says: "put your hands up" and, instead, you reach into your pants and pull out an object, the cop has reason to fire on you; even if it turns out all you had was your wallet and not a gun.
I would agree that Saddam was justifiably removed from power.
However, we went about doing it the wrong way. Remember what I said about "blowback?" The advisers suggested. prior to our action, that the best plan would be to arm and support the Northern Alliance, which is a surprisingly large group of Iraqi rebels who had been trying to overthrow Saddam for years, and were one of our allies during Desert Storm.
Imagine it for a second. Limited troop placement but heavy support available (already in place in Afghanistan).
A popular revolution by their own people who could certainly do a better job telling the aspirin factories and innocent women and children apart from the military headquarters and hidden gunmen. What with them living there and all.
Same goal. Saddam out of power.
That is if Saddam being out of power was our main and most important goal. Which it wasn't.
But then we wouldn't have had Haliburton there building multi-billion dollar refineries so we could control the refining of Europe and Asia's oil reserves from the Caspian Sea area now could we? Which is one of the real reasons we invaded.
This isn't conspiracy stuff. It's Bible-fact.
Dick Cheney left his job as Chairman of the Board of Haliburton to be Vice President with a multi-million dollar check in his pocket.
Bush and Co. campaigned on the idea that we would invade Iraq again, months before 9/11.
NONE of the hi-jackers were Iraqi. Saddam hated Bin Laden and wanted him killed. Hell, we used to be business partners with Saddam back in the '80s. Google "Rumsfeld Saddam" for a nice video of the two shaking hands if you don't believe me.
The truth of what has gone on in the region is well known and not hidden. Nor is our true motives.
@ebaofvn Mutually Assured Destruction still works today because many nuclear countries like Russia, North Korea, China, and others, don't want to die. Al Qaeda is not our only enemy.
Are you telling me North Korea and China have enough nukes to ensure Mutually Assured Destruction?
Seriously? Do you really believe that?
Because if not, then the question lingers. Why would we need MORE nukes when we already have enough to blow the entire world up? For what purpose? To make sure the craters have craters?
@ebaofvn Then why does the NSA do it if it's not effective? The courts have ruled that you can wiretap a domestic call if you have reason to believe it has a tie to a terrorist plot as long as you get a warrant after the fact.
You are absolutely right. We don't have the ability to go to war with everyone. But I'm sure you agree we should attack our enemies, of which having two very specific targets (Turkey and Saudi Arabia) given the reasons I mentioned.
I find your response interesting.
You rail against me for not wanting to stop terrorism, but I tell you how we can effectively stop terrorism and you're not really interested and making excuses.
But to sum all this up and return to my original point, you say I'm not patriotic because I want to prevent us from fighting terrorism.
I tell you quite the opposite and ask you directly, would you support an attack of Saudi Arabia and Turkey? You know... the countries that fund Al Qaeda. Two of the biggest funders. I mean direct, government-approved, open funding. All the hijackers on 9/11 came from there.
@ebaofvn You bring up some valid points but you are way off on Romney. This video is absurd Romney does not support "violent, radical jihad". He does not support a single global caliphate, either.
Seriously, if you don't support Romney, who do you support?
@phillip84109 Typical of the Romney supporters. Ignore the facts and deny them just because they are laced with a lil satire.
Yes, Romney wants to increase military presence in the Middle East. Yes he wants to increase our nuclear stockpile. Yes he wants to increase monitoring American phone calls. Those were all culled from his website. Saying he had a war on intelligence was just a little hyperbolas fun.
So yeah... check yourself before you start pointing fingers. Because you are dead wrong.
So, you want Al Queida to freely make phone calls to plan terrorist activities in the US?
Wow. I assume, because you also were against increasing nuclear weapons, that you were opposed to Ronald Reagan increasing our weapons in the arms race against the Soviet Union.
That is a very extreme, naive viewpoint.
I had no idea you supported America being attacked by terrorists while our government stands by and does nothing.
@phillip84109 And in fact, if you watch the original, unedited ad, you'll see he quite plainly says he wants to monitor American calls "that Al Qaeda makes."
The only way he can do that is to monitor the calls made by Americans. He doesn't have access to Afganistan's phone system (that I'm aware of). Seriously, dude.
Did you even listen to what my video says before you commented?
Anyway... I'm done responding for now, unless you're interested in serious discourse.
He does not approve violent radical fundamentalism, his goal is not to unite the world under a single military caliphate, he does not want to collapse freedom-loving nations, he never said he would increase our nuclear stockpile by 100,000 or that he would stop intelligence. However, I have to say this clip shows a lack of intelligence or attention to truth or accuracy.
He does want to expand our nuclear stockpile and while he didn't say "100,000," that's what the clip said and it was obvious hyperbole. He supports our actions in Iraq and wants to invade Iran which would, by virtue of said action, craft a single military caliphate. He did support collapsing a freedom loving nation: AMERICA. His fascist voting record shows that. The intelligence bit... that was a joke, obviously. If you didn't pick up that this was a joke, I feel sorry for you.
If you want to hate fine but when making specific statements it is important to be accurate when making such claims, supporting Iraq was only due the fact that we are already in Iraq and to simply leave would cause more problems than working out a plan to leave in the future.
He wants to 'collapse freedom loving nations (you mention the US) how exactly does he want to do that, he loves this country and its freedoms makes no sense he is for freedoms.
And no, I don't want to hate. I actually harbor no hatred towards Mitt at all. I found his contradictory statements of loving country coupled with doing things to destroy the principles that have guided this country and made it great to be unintentionally hilarious, hence the creation of this video.
I fear for our future and as a conservative, I wish we'd regain our interest in preserving the constitution and its purpose and meaning.
And as far as supporting action in Iraq goes, he voted for us to invade, he resisted all talks of withdrawal and certainly thinks we should be doing more in the Middle East, militarily. I don't know for certain but I'm sure he'd like to invade Syria if we could.
Frankly the issues are far more complex and to simply to withdraw had far worse ramification than working out a planned withdrawl, basically, it is still a lose-lose situation. Wish were were never in it to begin with. But if wishes were fishes...you know the saying.
And what Obama is doing is not frightening? Do we really even know who pulls Obama's strings? He is a puppet president and the media is afraid to say word one against him. Something I find interesting.
What does this prove, that you can press a few keys on a computer so can a monkey or a three year old. He never said or implied any of those things. If you want to insult someone at least be accurate and truthful.
I laugh at the fact that the maker of this video can't criticize what Mitt Romney actually says...and have to voice over everything. Not only was the voice over terrible, but so were the claims and arguments. I promise, you can do better.
Um... everything I use is things he actually believes. He wants to expand our nuclear missile stockpile, he's for monitoring American phone calls and he supports the war in Iraq which is a military caliphate, overthrowing another country to expand its power and reach.
So, sorry. But you are wrong. YOU STOLE FIZZY LIFTING DRINKS! YOU BUMPED INTO THE CEILING, WHICH NOW HAS TO BE WASHED AND STERILIZED, SO YOU GET NOTHING!! YOU LOSE!! GOOD DAY, SIR!!
Holy fuck! People say "the f-word" on the internet! I'm fucking shocked. This has seriously got me fucking offended. I can't fucking believe motherfuckers do this fucking thing like that!
If Mitt were President today instead of B.H.O. the country would be headed in the right direction, the Dow would be over 10,000 and headed up. Optimisim would prevail.
I'm a conservative Republican but there would have been NO WAY that I would vote for a mormon to run this country a mormon president would be as much of a disaster as if osama bin laden would be running this country
Well why don't you brilliant anti - mormons lead a coup to unseat Harry Reid before he destroys the country? (It's Liberals that are destroying us and Harry happens to be in the Mormon minority.) After he is gone then please read for the first time Article VI of the constitution. There was good reason our founding fathers were inspired to write this! One more thing, you are going to be really shocked when you meet you maker!
" All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any state to the Contrary notwithstanding.
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."
What part of that gives Mitt the ability to disregard the constitution, then? Since he certainly has no interest in abiding people's right to privacy (re: the Patriot Act).
No, really... do go on. I want to hear what other contradictions you're going to spout in these imitations of valid debate you keep making.
Or do you just randomly pick out Constitutional Amendments and cite them hoping nobody will notice you're contradicting yourself?
Instead of saying "liberals are the problem" [sic], as if it hasn't been whored out by every YouTube conservative already, try stating reasons to back up your claims; because even if they aren't factually sound, you'll at least have the benefit of looking like you were thinking a little before you posted.
That's a step up from the ton of dolts who fail to reply at all when I call them out on their bullshit.
Young man here is a brief example of wise counsel:
Any attempt through governmental intervention to redistribute the material rewards of labor can only result in the eventual destruction of the productive base of society, without which real abundance and security for more than the ruling elite is quite impossible. (see G. Edward Griffin, The Fearful Master, p. 128)
I hope you are not a knave. If not, you owe it to yourself and the learn from the wise and good who went before us.
From the description of this video which you apparently can't read:
"2) I am not a Liberal or a Democrat and I'm not voting for Obama or Hillary. I'm a Libertarian..."
I have no interest in redistributing wealth any more than you have interest in making a valid point. You rebuff none of what I've pointed out and you're quoting a book about the UN? WTF!?
I'm done with you. You're clearly a kook who can't build a solid argument to save your life.
I was responding to heavensxnight, I wasn't even talking to you. I will add though that there is nothing funny about your video. I would have never dreamed that I would wish for Bill Clinton back in office but I do now. Thankfully I know God is in control of all that goes on and in due time this earth will be cleansed. One other thing, have you noticed that people who like your video use the F-word? They must be fellow libertarians.
I asked for reasons to back up your claim about liberals, not a wordy thesis on the redistribution of wealth. Your pointless ageism aside, it would seem I was arguing with a cultist with a holier than thou complex (maybe that's redundant). I'll leave you to your own devices, Charles Darwin was surely onto something.
Okay... maybe not a troll, but just go up there to the part where he quotes a Constitutional Amendment on me, apparently hoping I'll just accept it and not actually ready it or anything, and when I do, it turns out to contradict the very reason he quoted it.
Maybe not a troll but totally a nutjob A-1 lunatic.
He's probably having to run back to the kitchen to get more foil for his hat between posts.
To the contrary it is your comments that are absurd. Aren't liberals for the redistribution of wealth? You asked how liberals were destroying the country and I gave you one way. How about another: Liberals promote immorality in many forms, abortion, homosexual behavior, pornography, etc. "America is great because she is good, and if America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great." (Alexis de Tocqueville 1831) As I said Liberals are destroying the country. Do you believe in God?
I forgot about this video! I love how the music gets all warped with the sound editing... I know it's not intentional, but it really adds to the comedy.
This video isn't satire, it's propaganda. You can't just edit words and phrases together and call it satire. Obviously you disagree with Romney, but this isn't making fun of present day society or the mannerisms of people, you're just trying to spread an extreme version of propaganda.
Irony, sarcasm, or caustic wit used to attack or expose folly, vice, or stupidity."
You really have no fucking clue what you're talking about, do you? Kinda funny since you popped out the box dissing my level of education. Funny in that shameful, ironic way that saddens me.
"propaganda
n
Information which is false or twisted."
And just what propaganda am I passing on? That Mitt is a fascist? Um... Mitt IS a fascist. He promotes fascism. That's what fascists do.
Mitt wants to extend warrentless wiretapping, he voted to repeal Posse Comitatus and Habeus Corpus, he believes government's place is to define marriage, he's opposed to any speech he deems offensive and has worked to pass laws against that type of speech, he supports illegal interrogation techniques of both citizens and non-citizens alike if they are suspected terrorists...
These are the types of things Mussolini did. Remember him? The fascist Italian dictator? Read a history book.
All info taken straight from Mitt's website so either he's lying about his track record and wants me to think he's a fascist, or it's true (it all is) and he's a fucking fascist.
Either way, his kind must be stopped.
That's my case. Prove to me that Mitt opposes fascism like he says in his original commercial. That will require you to point out some things he's done to quell fascism.
If I'm right, then the things I said are true. Ergo, the video is not propaganda.
Funny how this video doesn't even work anymore yet people still comment on it.
Right right, another Republican "boob". The one's who know that small and large buisnesses run a capitalist country (not how the unemployed run a socialist country, the one's who value human life, patriotism, and traditional American values are the boobs.
We'll be dead at the end of the term of Barack Huessein Ayers Al-Qaeda Obama anyway so our differences won't matter.
Okay... that was incredibly ignorant of you. I'm not anti-Mormon. I'm opposed to Mitt Romney who is a Mormon but did you actually WATCH this video before you commented or did you just assume I was attacking him for his religious beliefs because NOWHERE in the video do I even mention Mormonism or any of the beliefs thereof.
Youtubers are hilarious sometimes (but not on purpose).
hes a fascist nut? LMAO and what do you call ur boy obama? a communist. i mean id rather have a fascist anyday of the week then a commie. your a fucking idiot tho if you actually believe that about romney...apparently being patriotic is called "fascism" yes i know that nationalism is a part of fascism but still having pride in ones country is not a bad thing and its what we should all have..did you see what this guy did at the olympics? he erased its entire debt. GREATEST MAN OF ALL TIME
What the hell are you talking about? I don't support Obama at all. He IS a fascist nut because he proposes fascist things. I discuss that further down, as well as the fact that I'm a Libertarian. Seems like you need some reading glasses and maybe a slap in the face.
His policies. More specifically his policies regarding public privacy (monitoring American phone calls to "prevent terrorism" when terrorists know this and use disposable cell phones), voting to repeal Habeas Corpus and Posse Comitatus, supporting corporate-run but militarily-backed shadow democracies like Iraq (and he wants to do with Iran) (that's the type of thing Mussolini did) and I could go on and on and on. Many of the very things he mentions in the unedited version of this ad.
And for the record, I'm no fan of Hillary or Obama or Edwards either. I'm a Libertarian.
So, basically, I'm interested in freedom because freedom is the only true path to security. Lack of freedom (as Mitt and his ilk have so frequently tried to foist upon the public) actually leads to less security. If my government imprisons or kills me, I'm just as imprisoned or dead as if a terrorist did it.
Most of the politicians these days seem to be using the Bill of Rights, Constitution and all the basics of what we built this country upon to wipe their Ass. Read 1984. Despite what your high school teach told you, it's not about Communism. It's about fascism. And that's the direction we head closer to every day. Just look at how many times the reasons behind the Iraq war changed: WMD's, terrorism, liberation, Saddam was just a bad man. We actually have a Department of Misinformation. Seriously.
I mean, we're not talking about a small case for his push to fascism.
We're talking about limitations on free speech, ability to gather (part of the Patriot Act) and much, much more. It's a scary time for our country, and it parallels the time in World War II when Italy realized what they had become. You might want to read up on that too. It's eerily similar to our own current decisions being made by our elected leaders like Mitt.
...WELL BRACE YOURSELVES...IF JOHN MACAIN WHO HAS AN AGGRESSIVE FORM OF SKIN CANCER THAT CAN COME BACK PICS ROMNEY , A MORMON AS HIS RUNNING MATE AND WINS THE ELECTION THEN WE MAY JUST HAVE A MORMON A BREATH AWAY FROM THE WHITE HOUSE AFTER ALL WEARING HIS MAGIC MORMON UNDERWEAR WITH THOSE SAME WACKY KOOKY BELIEFS...scary...
I didn't say anything about Mormonism in any of the video. I attacked him for wanting to violate my rights and freedoms for something that won't even provide security and all of his deeds done in the name of semi-racist jingoism.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This is terrible! How could anyone create such a farse as this video! Obviously it was edited and it was not the real commercial! But WOW! People these days! It's sickening what one will do in fear to make someone else...(who is a good Christian man) look badly!...sad... just sad.
What's embarrassing to me is how, even though this is edited, everything mentioned here is still stuff that Mitt believes, yet people like you try and defend it.
One thing I'm certainly not doing is misrepresenting the man: break it down.
Does he want to police the world? YES!
Does he want to monitor innocent Americans? YES!
Does he want to increase our nuclear capability? YES!
So, seriously, what am I saying that he doesn't already say? That he's fighting a war on intelligence?
I never defended Mitt. Shrunkensunshine was whining about it. Personally, I hate Mitt and agree with you that this is his actual message: stay in an unnessecary war that is costing us a fortune and, as you said, police the world, monitor the calls America makes, and increase our nuclear program. I'm sorry for not being clear enough in my first comment.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Mitt Romney appears to be choking bigtime tonight. That's too bad, I was looking forward to watching him get beaten like a redheaded stepchild this November.
But the good news is that douchebags like Limbaugh, Coulter and Hannity must be having strokes.
ok stupidass... Mitt stands for Mitchell. Its better than idiotic names like shaquisha and lebron and Keyshawm. second this is horrible. it looks like a translated japenese cartoon. i admit, even as a Romney supporter that this would be pretty good if it was done well.
This man is the biggest FAKE I have ever seen in national politics in my life, and I've seen 'em come and I've seen 'em go since the 1960's. This man will do or say anything to get elected. He plays dirty, he thinks he can buy an election. Of all the candidates on either side this year he revolts me the most.
Romney is a sock puppet. The best fund-raising sock puppet the establishment can find, besides Obama, of course.
THEShaneDZ 2 weeks ago
Mitt... Mitt.. "mit" is the German word for with... so he is "with" romney... ummm
daMick87 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Rmoney's dad = 1st MexicanAmerican (born in Chihuaha) to run for President
Mitt's family was so patriotic they fled to Mexico to evade US law
Mitt has many thousands of cousins (some still in Mexico) 'cause a few generations had 12 wives each
1 got shot by the husband of a lady that a Romney grandfather "married" (she was still married to another but since Mitt's line goes to a mormon apostle, he had god on his side till he got shot dead)
Immigration flip-flops, like others = Rmoney LIES
dleechristy 3 weeks ago
Well, we did stop intelligence in the country.
quikgamer 3 weeks ago in playlist More videos from ebaofvn
haha well at least he's honest in this video
3521soda 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL 2012! OUR ONLY HOPE
Sylinic 1 month ago
lol mittens FTL
syborius 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS THE WORST REPUBLICANS DID TO USA;
1) REAGAN MADE SOVIET UNION DISAPEARED AND OPEN EYES TO RUSSIA NOW THEY ARE BECOMING CAPITALISTIC COUNTRY?
2) BUSH WAS DRUNK MADE TWIN TOWERS COLAPSED, KILLED 3000 AMERICAN PEOPLE AND MADE THE WHOLE COUNTRY TO HAVE POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER, NOW EVERYBODY IS
PARANOID THANKS TO REPUBLICANS?
3) SPEND TOO MUCH TIME ON FUCKING LEWINSKY DRESS INSTEAD OF FOCUSING ON EUROPEAN UNION CREATED EUROS?
GOP MUST BE PROSECUTED!
democratsaresmart 2 months ago
well, for once he says what he's thinking, and what the people in control of him want the world to become.
BandMuteEm 2 months ago
This is funny.
garytcw 3 months ago
/watch?NR=1&v=CJc9-MRE5kw
theoremaxim 4 months ago
LOL that was very funny. I especially like how you edited it to make it look like Romney was flipping the bird, and the references to the book 1984.
beckyboston 4 months ago
Laughing my head off with this. Wonderfully done.
Dan474834 4 months ago
"we will collapse nations" he says and "stop intelligence"
funny.
rcacad 5 months ago
KIND OF HARD BEING TAKEN SERIOUSLY WHEN YOU SERVE SATANS ARMY.
WHAT AN IGNORANT NEW WORLD ORDER HACK.........
GOD HELP THE FURTHER ASS RAPING OF AMERICA & THE WORLD IF THIS GUY IS COMMANDER AND CHIEF.
rcacad 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Vote Ron Paul!!!! 2012
jbinsane123 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HEY ROMNEY...
ARE YOU GOING TO END THE FEDERAL RESERVE(CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION FACT)
ARE YOU GOING TO CLOSE 900 MILITARY BASES AROUND THE WORLD SO WE CAN HAVE SOME PEACE?
ARE YOU GOING TO END THE PATRIOT ACT?
ARE YOU GOING TO SHRINK THE GOV BY 50%?
IF YOUR ANSWER IS NO TO ANY OF THESE QUESTIONS.THEN...YOU ARE USELESS TO ME AND MY FAMILY.
SO....WHAT CANDIDATE IS GOING TO ACCOMPLISH THE PROBLEMS I MENTIONED?
DR. RON PAUL. BECAUSE I REFUSE TO WASTE MY VOTE.
Gioxtream 5 months ago
We've been made to fear the terrorists accept the erosion of our liberties. Our money is constantly being devalued. This financial crisis is being engineered, theres no other explanation for the things going on. The perpetual wars, and the increasingly invading police state. These are not conspiracy theory anymore they are fact. Ron Paul is our last hope to stop this 1 world government that is now being introduced to us as the solution by the mainstream media. Wake Up. the answer to 1984 is 1776
fauxmocracy 6 months ago
Time for the lesser of the the 2 evils again, 2012
strokeofirish1 7 months ago
@strokeofirish1 are you discounting Ron Paul 2012?
rcacad 5 months ago
This is terribly immature, yet incredibly hilarious.
iLostMyUsernameLOL 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
QUESTION FOR MITT ROMNEY: ARE YOU GOING TO END THE CRIMINAL FEDERAL RESERVE? ARE YOU GOING TO SHRINK THE USA GOV BY 50%? ARE YOU GOING TO CLOSE THE 900 MILITARY BASES AROUND THE WORLD AND BRING TRILLIONS HOME? ARE YOU GOING TO REOPEN 9/11 INVESTIGATION? ARE YOU GOING TO END THE SICK SEXUAL TSA? ARE YOU BRINGING THE TROOP NOW? RIGHT AWAY? ARE YOU GOING TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OR SHIT ON IT? IF NOT...PLEASE....MOVE AWAY AND LET DR RON PAUL BY IN CHARGE. RON PRESIDENT 2012
Gioxtream 7 months ago
Anyone who supports Mitt is just a media cattle. Moooooooooo you uneducated cows.
dem0nicist 7 months ago 28
@dem0nicist : and not to mention a sheep. Baaaaaaaaaaaaa. Mitt Romney himself is just a turkey.
beckyboston 4 months ago
For all you Romney lovers, enjoy this video of Mitt proving himself to be a total asshole.
youtube.com/watch?v=NY6UTnS6Z-A
randyman19 8 months ago
lol you can hear the copy an pasted words FAKE
TGNproductions24 9 months ago
@TGNproductions24 How observant!
ebaofvn 9 months ago 23
@ebaofvn
So what you're admitting is that you took his words and literally cut and pasted them into completely distorted lies--and you did this why?--the only logical answer is because you couldn't find anything real to criticize him with.
jinnagus 8 months ago
@jinnagus Ha ha ha... sure.. this certainly contains no commentary at all. It certainly isn't some form of satire. Yeah buddy... oh yeah.
ebaofvn 8 months ago 11
@jinnagus Thanks I didn't notice that. I am glad he is not or at least hope not he is prowar. That is the last thing we need.
gigaboy47 5 months ago
@jinnagus Its hard to criticize Romney cuz NO ONE KNOWS WHAT HE STANDS FOR.
I challenge you to find one issue where he hasnt flip flopped
jinkz2608 2 months ago
@ebaofvn haha!... OMG! you can so totally tell it's fake! pshit... 1 blonde; 1 vote...
wac070486 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TGNproductions24 -- As late as 2005 & 2006, Romney made jokes like this? "I believe marriage should be between a man and a woman … and a woman … and a woman," Romney quipped at the 2005 St. Patrick's Day breakfast in Boston. He made the same joke on Don Imus' 2006 St. Patrick's Day show. Romney's family tree has lots of polygamy. and his father was born in Mexico. He's currently trying to convince the Tea Party he's a good Christian who will reduce the debt.
vechorik 3 months ago
Comment removed
andycapist1 1 week ago
As a big-time Mitthead, I find this video hilarious.
2012Romney 9 months ago
Ron Paul/Jesse Ventura 2012 I'm Sick Of Seeing And Hearing The Same Old Shit From All These Phony Ass Lobby Paid Politicians Promising Change.Fucking bullshit! All These BushMongers And ObamaBots Are Running The United States Into The Ground! I'm Voting Ron Paul/Jesse Ventura 2012 I'm Sick Of The Lies And Unconstitutional Wars.
130hc 9 months ago
Ron Paul's Debate Day Money Bomb!!!! May 5, 2011!! Google + LibertyPAC
MIDWEST507REPIN 9 months ago
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Romney is an extremely dangerous beady eyed maniac!!!
cartoonglutton 9 months ago
I agree he is the biggest liar that picture of him shaking the soldiers hand is propaganda when in his heart he loves his faith so another words anybody not Mormon is cast out
bobbyraejohnson 9 months ago
Mitt Romney The worse joke ever!!! Check my video out in my account.
THE LIAR
Gioxtream 11 months ago
If they put this guy in...we will have another 4 years of obama/bush/clinton/ect ect style politics.
tbscrazy12 1 year ago
genius. thanks!
Breetastic 1 year ago
If you are gonna photoshop a finger, at least don't add a white one and leave tthe real one in view. Nice try, silly.
1musicwayne 1 year ago
The one refreshing thing about Romeny is he admits from the get go that he wants to increase our military to fascist size. Conservative my ass
Drac39 1 year ago
Nicely done, ebaofvn
icarus313 1 year ago
I read your sidebar and watched the video.
You have him saying that he approves of "violent, radical fundamentalism." and his goal is to "unite the world under a single military caliphate." and that he wants to stop intelligence.
You know those things are all true. In fact, he wants to fight against those who are violent extremists and stop a global caliphate. And he obviously wants more intelligence, not less.
Yes, he wants to monitor phone calls we make to Al Queida. So what?
phillip84109 1 year ago
@phillip84109
Ha ha ha... no... let's take that comment point by point.
He wants to monitor calls Al Qaida makes. Can he monitor Afgan calls or Iranian calls? No. He can only push for monitoring the calls of Americans. Which is what he wants. First off, the very people in charge of intelligence gathering will tell you that it's not an effective form of intelligence gathering.
It's the whole reason we arrested those Middle Eastern men for buying cell phones in August of 2006.
ebaofvn 1 year ago
The enemy may be unscrupulous, but they are not idiots. They know our calls are monitored. So they buy disposable cell phones. Seriously... this is news so old it was old in 2006, which was four years ago.
The core problem is that we're monitoring Americans who have done nothing wrong, and that's ILLEGAL. It's not my opinion. It's ILLEGAL.
Moving on...
He does support a violent, radical fundamentalism. The idea that we should invade Iraq, which he supported, proves that.
ebaofvn 1 year ago
The entire invasion was a farce from beginning to end that has, according to the actual intelligence community, INCREASED the amount of terrorist activity. The CIA calls it "Blowback," based on a firefighting term they use as a metaphor.
Simply put, if you mess around with other countries, you can expect consequences. Some good. Some bad. The bad can often be predicted.
If you send troops to the Middle East to blow up towns and kill women and children (not on purpose mind you) then...
ebaofvn 1 year ago
yeah... you can expect consequences. Like more terrorists. Plus, here's a news flash for you... Saddam Hussein HATED Bin Laden, Al Qaeda AND terrorists. He had them KILLED. Read up on the history of the area.
I would be remiss to paint that mad, brutal, bloodthirsty dictator as sympathetic so I won't, but if you think removing him from power and maintaining a military presence in the Middle East is a good idea, you might want to discuss it with all the generals and planners who resigned.
ebaofvn 1 year ago
There were quite a few. The damage done to our image in the Middle East has only fueled terrorism further. Not quelled it.
Moving along...
Nuclear proliferation is something I foolishly supported in the '80s when I was a young, idealistic Republican.
I realize in hindsight it's not that great an idea and certainly won't work now.
Against whom? How can you fight terrorism with nukes?
Or Iran? Or North Korea?
ebaofvn 1 year ago
The sole reason Mutually Assured Destruction worked in the '80s was that both sides understood they would lose and did not want to die.
That doesn't really work against cultures that believe to die fighting a great evil is the greatest death bringing about a wonderful reward.
I'm actually not opposed to war, it may surprise you. I think our action in Afghanistan is justified and I propose we storm Turkey and Saudi Arabia as well to truly attack our enemy.
ebaofvn 1 year ago
On 9/11, one third of the hi-jackers were Turkish and the other two thirds were Saudi Arabian. Turkey and Saudi Arabian governments openly fund and support Al Qaeda as well as a host of other anti-American terrorists groups and networks.
If you're truly interested in fighting terrorism, you need to increase funding to the CIA (with the caveat that we will monitor their actions more closely) and root out the source THERE
ebaofvn 1 year ago
If you have no interest in that, or similar action towards those specific targets, then you have no interest in stopping anti-American terrorism.
Romney certainly isn't going that route, which exposes him for what he is: a liar, disinterested in the fundamentals of our free democratic republic in favor of jingoistic fascism.
So, would you invade Turkey and Saudi Arabia?
ebaofvn 1 year ago
@ebaofvn Having said that, we can't go to war with everybody. Nor do we want to use nuclear weapons on anybody. But we still have to make sure that we have nuclear weapons. If we were to unilaterally disarm, that would be a disaster because that would certainly leave us vulnerable to an attack.
That's why, just like with the Cold War, we need to have a strong nuclear arsenal. It's also important to have a strong SDI to defend against nuclear attack.
phillip84109 1 year ago
@ebaofvn Also, Iraq was a justifiable war. The fact that Sadam Hussein was not complying with the terms of the cease fire justified it. That was the real issue. We had suspicions, but no real way of knowing if there were WMDs until we went in.
It's the same principle if a cop says: "put your hands up" and, instead, you reach into your pants and pull out an object, the cop has reason to fire on you; even if it turns out all you had was your wallet and not a gun.
It's a simple concept.
phillip84109 1 year ago
I would agree that Saddam was justifiably removed from power.
However, we went about doing it the wrong way. Remember what I said about "blowback?" The advisers suggested. prior to our action, that the best plan would be to arm and support the Northern Alliance, which is a surprisingly large group of Iraqi rebels who had been trying to overthrow Saddam for years, and were one of our allies during Desert Storm.
ebaofvn 1 year ago
Imagine it for a second. Limited troop placement but heavy support available (already in place in Afghanistan).
A popular revolution by their own people who could certainly do a better job telling the aspirin factories and innocent women and children apart from the military headquarters and hidden gunmen. What with them living there and all.
Same goal. Saddam out of power.
That is if Saddam being out of power was our main and most important goal. Which it wasn't.
ebaofvn 1 year ago
But then we wouldn't have had Haliburton there building multi-billion dollar refineries so we could control the refining of Europe and Asia's oil reserves from the Caspian Sea area now could we? Which is one of the real reasons we invaded.
This isn't conspiracy stuff. It's Bible-fact.
Dick Cheney left his job as Chairman of the Board of Haliburton to be Vice President with a multi-million dollar check in his pocket.
ebaofvn 1 year ago
Bush and Co. campaigned on the idea that we would invade Iraq again, months before 9/11.
NONE of the hi-jackers were Iraqi. Saddam hated Bin Laden and wanted him killed. Hell, we used to be business partners with Saddam back in the '80s. Google "Rumsfeld Saddam" for a nice video of the two shaking hands if you don't believe me.
The truth of what has gone on in the region is well known and not hidden. Nor is our true motives.
ebaofvn 1 year ago
@ebaofvn Mutually Assured Destruction still works today because many nuclear countries like Russia, North Korea, China, and others, don't want to die. Al Qaeda is not our only enemy.
phillip84109 1 year ago
Are you telling me North Korea and China have enough nukes to ensure Mutually Assured Destruction?
Seriously? Do you really believe that?
Because if not, then the question lingers. Why would we need MORE nukes when we already have enough to blow the entire world up? For what purpose? To make sure the craters have craters?
ebaofvn 1 year ago
@ebaofvn Then why does the NSA do it if it's not effective? The courts have ruled that you can wiretap a domestic call if you have reason to believe it has a tie to a terrorist plot as long as you get a warrant after the fact.
phillip84109 1 year ago
You are absolutely right. We don't have the ability to go to war with everyone. But I'm sure you agree we should attack our enemies, of which having two very specific targets (Turkey and Saudi Arabia) given the reasons I mentioned.
I find your response interesting.
You rail against me for not wanting to stop terrorism, but I tell you how we can effectively stop terrorism and you're not really interested and making excuses.
Check yourself.
ebaofvn 1 year ago
The NSA does EXACTLY what I agree with. It's the idea of a warrantless system that I oppose and that Romney wants.
Again, my source was his campaign.
ebaofvn 1 year ago
But to sum all this up and return to my original point, you say I'm not patriotic because I want to prevent us from fighting terrorism.
I tell you quite the opposite and ask you directly, would you support an attack of Saudi Arabia and Turkey? You know... the countries that fund Al Qaeda. Two of the biggest funders. I mean direct, government-approved, open funding. All the hijackers on 9/11 came from there.
You don't seem to. Neither does Romney.
So I see you both for what you are.
Good day.
ebaofvn 1 year ago 7
@ebaofvn You bring up some valid points but you are way off on Romney. This video is absurd Romney does not support "violent, radical jihad". He does not support a single global caliphate, either.
Seriously, if you don't support Romney, who do you support?
phillip84109 1 year ago
@phillip84109 You spelled Al Qaeda wrong, dumbass.
whammy349 1 year ago
Typical of the Romney bashers:
Ignore the facts about the man and make stuff up.
phillip84109 1 year ago
@phillip84109 Typical of the Romney supporters. Ignore the facts and deny them just because they are laced with a lil satire.
Yes, Romney wants to increase military presence in the Middle East. Yes he wants to increase our nuclear stockpile. Yes he wants to increase monitoring American phone calls. Those were all culled from his website. Saying he had a war on intelligence was just a little hyperbolas fun.
So yeah... check yourself before you start pointing fingers. Because you are dead wrong.
ebaofvn 1 year ago
So, you want Al Queida to freely make phone calls to plan terrorist activities in the US?
Wow. I assume, because you also were against increasing nuclear weapons, that you were opposed to Ronald Reagan increasing our weapons in the arms race against the Soviet Union.
That is a very extreme, naive viewpoint.
I had no idea you supported America being attacked by terrorists while our government stands by and does nothing.
I don't think that is a winning strategy.
phillip84109 1 year ago
@phillip84109 In fact, please read my other comments below where I break this down in far more detail.
Then, read up on what the man believes.
ebaofvn 1 year ago
@phillip84109 And in fact, if you watch the original, unedited ad, you'll see he quite plainly says he wants to monitor American calls "that Al Qaeda makes."
The only way he can do that is to monitor the calls made by Americans. He doesn't have access to Afganistan's phone system (that I'm aware of). Seriously, dude.
Did you even listen to what my video says before you commented?
Anyway... I'm done responding for now, unless you're interested in serious discourse.
ebaofvn 1 year ago
When in doubt, remember these two names: Ron Paul
mikelunz 1 year ago
Romney is a tool.
Protowhilst 1 year ago
lol Romney.
lcswoosh 2 years ago
He does not approve violent radical fundamentalism, his goal is not to unite the world under a single military caliphate, he does not want to collapse freedom-loving nations, he never said he would increase our nuclear stockpile by 100,000 or that he would stop intelligence. However, I have to say this clip shows a lack of intelligence or attention to truth or accuracy.
pangeanet 2 years ago
He does want to expand our nuclear stockpile and while he didn't say "100,000," that's what the clip said and it was obvious hyperbole. He supports our actions in Iraq and wants to invade Iran which would, by virtue of said action, craft a single military caliphate. He did support collapsing a freedom loving nation: AMERICA. His fascist voting record shows that. The intelligence bit... that was a joke, obviously. If you didn't pick up that this was a joke, I feel sorry for you.
ebaofvn 2 years ago
If you want to hate fine but when making specific statements it is important to be accurate when making such claims, supporting Iraq was only due the fact that we are already in Iraq and to simply leave would cause more problems than working out a plan to leave in the future.
He wants to 'collapse freedom loving nations (you mention the US) how exactly does he want to do that, he loves this country and its freedoms makes no sense he is for freedoms.
I did get the joke hence my own retort :)
pangeanet 2 years ago
Wiretapping. The Patriot Act. Voting to repeal Habeas Corpus and Posse Comitatus.
I could go on and on. Those actions break down the freedom you say you love.
Habeas Corpus is the basic right to be represented with a trial and evidence shown in court that you are guilty of a crime you are accused of.
Posse Comitatis the right to rebel and dissent against the government.
The Patriot Act was rife with things that collapsed our freedoms. This is not arbitrary idle talk. It's record-based fact.
ebaofvn 2 years ago
And no, I don't want to hate. I actually harbor no hatred towards Mitt at all. I found his contradictory statements of loving country coupled with doing things to destroy the principles that have guided this country and made it great to be unintentionally hilarious, hence the creation of this video.
I fear for our future and as a conservative, I wish we'd regain our interest in preserving the constitution and its purpose and meaning.
ebaofvn 2 years ago
And as far as supporting action in Iraq goes, he voted for us to invade, he resisted all talks of withdrawal and certainly thinks we should be doing more in the Middle East, militarily. I don't know for certain but I'm sure he'd like to invade Syria if we could.
ebaofvn 2 years ago
Frankly the issues are far more complex and to simply to withdraw had far worse ramification than working out a planned withdrawl, basically, it is still a lose-lose situation. Wish were were never in it to begin with. But if wishes were fishes...you know the saying.
And what Obama is doing is not frightening? Do we really even know who pulls Obama's strings? He is a puppet president and the media is afraid to say word one against him. Something I find interesting.
pangeanet 2 years ago 2
Well, I can't defend Obama. I didn't vote for the man and I'm not a fan of his policies either.
ebaofvn 2 years ago
@ebaofvn Romney blows. He is not a real conservative. We can see right through him. He's a phony.
therealscl 1 year ago
What does this prove, that you can press a few keys on a computer so can a monkey or a three year old. He never said or implied any of those things. If you want to insult someone at least be accurate and truthful.
pangeanet 2 years ago
This is really funny haha
not
AequitasVeritas7777 2 years ago
Yeah... you have a point.
ebaofvn 2 years ago
I laugh at the fact that the maker of this video can't criticize what Mitt Romney actually says...and have to voice over everything. Not only was the voice over terrible, but so were the claims and arguments. I promise, you can do better.
jaredtingey 2 years ago
Um... everything I use is things he actually believes. He wants to expand our nuclear missile stockpile, he's for monitoring American phone calls and he supports the war in Iraq which is a military caliphate, overthrowing another country to expand its power and reach.
So, sorry. But you are wrong. YOU STOLE FIZZY LIFTING DRINKS! YOU BUMPED INTO THE CEILING, WHICH NOW HAS TO BE WASHED AND STERILIZED, SO YOU GET NOTHING!! YOU LOSE!! GOOD DAY, SIR!!
ebaofvn 2 years ago
Also... the "voice over" was just a re-edit of clips from the actual commercial. The voice you are hearing is Mitt Romney's.
CRITICISM FAIL.
ebaofvn 2 years ago
Isn't that a suprise, look below, another lover of this video uses the "F" word.
wdwrightii 2 years ago
Holy fuck! People say "the f-word" on the internet! I'm fucking shocked. This has seriously got me fucking offended. I can't fucking believe motherfuckers do this fucking thing like that!
FUCKING FUCKITY FUCK FUCK FUCK!
ebaofvn 2 years ago
hahahaha this is great! "I'm Mitt Romney, and I'm a talking head with no fucking backbone."
HoFoShAo 2 years ago
If Mitt were President today instead of B.H.O. the country would be headed in the right direction, the Dow would be over 10,000 and headed up. Optimisim would prevail.
wdwrightii 2 years ago
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! You're hilarious!
No, no... do go on.
ebaofvn 2 years ago
I'm a conservative Republican but there would have been NO WAY that I would vote for a mormon to run this country a mormon president would be as much of a disaster as if osama bin laden would be running this country
Theeagerburger 2 years ago
Well why don't you brilliant anti - mormons lead a coup to unseat Harry Reid before he destroys the country? (It's Liberals that are destroying us and Harry happens to be in the Mormon minority.) After he is gone then please read for the first time Article VI of the constitution. There was good reason our founding fathers were inspired to write this! One more thing, you are going to be really shocked when you meet you maker!
wdwrightii 2 years ago
You've constructed a mighty powerful argument there. I'm blown away by your debate prowess. You win this round, Super Mormon.
(NOTE: I wrote the above on opposite day.)
ebaofvn 2 years ago
So:
" All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.
ebaofvn 2 years ago
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any state to the Contrary notwithstanding.
ebaofvn 2 years ago
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."
ebaofvn 2 years ago
What part of that gives Mitt the ability to disregard the constitution, then? Since he certainly has no interest in abiding people's right to privacy (re: the Patriot Act).
No, really... do go on. I want to hear what other contradictions you're going to spout in these imitations of valid debate you keep making.
Or do you just randomly pick out Constitutional Amendments and cite them hoping nobody will notice you're contradicting yourself?
ebaofvn 2 years ago
Instead of saying "liberals are the problem" [sic], as if it hasn't been whored out by every YouTube conservative already, try stating reasons to back up your claims; because even if they aren't factually sound, you'll at least have the benefit of looking like you were thinking a little before you posted.
That's a step up from the ton of dolts who fail to reply at all when I call them out on their bullshit.
heavensxnight 2 years ago
Young man here is a brief example of wise counsel:
Any attempt through governmental intervention to redistribute the material rewards of labor can only result in the eventual destruction of the productive base of society, without which real abundance and security for more than the ruling elite is quite impossible. (see G. Edward Griffin, The Fearful Master, p. 128)
I hope you are not a knave. If not, you owe it to yourself and the learn from the wise and good who went before us.
wdwrightii 2 years ago
I'M NOT A LIBERAL.
From the description of this video which you apparently can't read:
"2) I am not a Liberal or a Democrat and I'm not voting for Obama or Hillary. I'm a Libertarian..."
I have no interest in redistributing wealth any more than you have interest in making a valid point. You rebuff none of what I've pointed out and you're quoting a book about the UN? WTF!?
I'm done with you. You're clearly a kook who can't build a solid argument to save your life.
I feel really sorry for you.
ebaofvn 2 years ago
I was responding to heavensxnight, I wasn't even talking to you. I will add though that there is nothing funny about your video. I would have never dreamed that I would wish for Bill Clinton back in office but I do now. Thankfully I know God is in control of all that goes on and in due time this earth will be cleansed. One other thing, have you noticed that people who like your video use the F-word? They must be fellow libertarians.
wdwrightii 2 years ago
I asked for reasons to back up your claim about liberals, not a wordy thesis on the redistribution of wealth. Your pointless ageism aside, it would seem I was arguing with a cultist with a holier than thou complex (maybe that's redundant). I'll leave you to your own devices, Charles Darwin was surely onto something.
heavensxnight 2 years ago
He's clearly a kook. A nut. A crazed lunatic with a computer.
Let's not feed the troll, shall we?
ebaofvn 2 years ago
I have to say, that was a clever remix - I particularly like the middle finger image "enhancement" you snuck in there. Very clever. : )
mikepalomino 2 years ago
Thanks! This was a fun little thing to make.
ebaofvn 2 years ago
Duely noted, though trolls usually act a certain way for attention. I sadly fear this kook isn't -acting- the part.
heavensxnight 2 years ago
Okay... maybe not a troll, but just go up there to the part where he quotes a Constitutional Amendment on me, apparently hoping I'll just accept it and not actually ready it or anything, and when I do, it turns out to contradict the very reason he quoted it.
Maybe not a troll but totally a nutjob A-1 lunatic.
He's probably having to run back to the kitchen to get more foil for his hat between posts.
ebaofvn 2 years ago
To the contrary it is your comments that are absurd. Aren't liberals for the redistribution of wealth? You asked how liberals were destroying the country and I gave you one way. How about another: Liberals promote immorality in many forms, abortion, homosexual behavior, pornography, etc. "America is great because she is good, and if America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great." (Alexis de Tocqueville 1831) As I said Liberals are destroying the country. Do you believe in God?
wdwrightii 2 years ago
I forgot about this video! I love how the music gets all warped with the sound editing... I know it's not intentional, but it really adds to the comedy.
todaystomsawyer 3 years ago
llololololololololololololololololololololol
krazyliger 3 years ago
Fucking brilliant!!
TexanProgressive 3 years ago
Being conservative, I find this fuckin' hilarious anyway. lol
Furious321 3 years ago
Dis is so funny!
RhyminSimon82 3 years ago
What's with those gray sideburns? He looks like Reed Richards from the Fantastic Four. Not suprising seeing as how he stretches the truth.
airdriver 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Stupid exaggerated left-wing propaganda. How about instead of spreading lies with shitty sound-editing you go get an actual education?
WiiPens 3 years ago
Actually, I have a college education.
And I'm a conservative. Sounds like you need to educate yourself on who you are commenting upon.
Um... you could just read the other comments on this very page and you'd see that.
But instead, you'd rather spin your own propaganda bullshit.
Again, youtubers amaze with their own hypocritical stupidity.
ebaofvn 3 years ago
My comment isn't propaganda.
This video isn't satire, it's propaganda. You can't just edit words and phrases together and call it satire. Obviously you disagree with Romney, but this isn't making fun of present day society or the mannerisms of people, you're just trying to spread an extreme version of propaganda.
WiiPens 3 years ago
"satire
n
Irony, sarcasm, or caustic wit used to attack or expose folly, vice, or stupidity."
You really have no fucking clue what you're talking about, do you? Kinda funny since you popped out the box dissing my level of education. Funny in that shameful, ironic way that saddens me.
"propaganda
n
Information which is false or twisted."
And just what propaganda am I passing on? That Mitt is a fascist? Um... Mitt IS a fascist. He promotes fascism. That's what fascists do.
ebaofvn 3 years ago
To wit:
Mitt wants to extend warrentless wiretapping, he voted to repeal Posse Comitatus and Habeus Corpus, he believes government's place is to define marriage, he's opposed to any speech he deems offensive and has worked to pass laws against that type of speech, he supports illegal interrogation techniques of both citizens and non-citizens alike if they are suspected terrorists...
These are the types of things Mussolini did. Remember him? The fascist Italian dictator? Read a history book.
ebaofvn 3 years ago
All info taken straight from Mitt's website so either he's lying about his track record and wants me to think he's a fascist, or it's true (it all is) and he's a fucking fascist.
Either way, his kind must be stopped.
That's my case. Prove to me that Mitt opposes fascism like he says in his original commercial. That will require you to point out some things he's done to quell fascism.
If I'm right, then the things I said are true. Ergo, the video is not propaganda.
Good luck. You'll need it.
ebaofvn 3 years ago
Mitt Romney is just another Republican boob. So just sit back and enjoy the laughter.
Trekkerjon 3 years ago
Funny how this video doesn't even work anymore yet people still comment on it.
Right right, another Republican "boob". The one's who know that small and large buisnesses run a capitalist country (not how the unemployed run a socialist country, the one's who value human life, patriotism, and traditional American values are the boobs.
We'll be dead at the end of the term of Barack Huessein Ayers Al-Qaeda Obama anyway so our differences won't matter.
WiiPens 3 years ago
== Right right, another Republican "boob". REPUBLICAN BOOBS: Reagan, Bush, Bush, and now McCain/Palin.
Trekkerjon 3 years ago
amen
ldssaint17 3 years ago
In fact, to make it easy, just read the video info.
ebaofvn 3 years ago
Okay... that was incredibly ignorant of you. I'm not anti-Mormon. I'm opposed to Mitt Romney who is a Mormon but did you actually WATCH this video before you commented or did you just assume I was attacking him for his religious beliefs because NOWHERE in the video do I even mention Mormonism or any of the beliefs thereof.
Youtubers are hilarious sometimes (but not on purpose).
ebaofvn 3 years ago
hes a fascist nut? LMAO and what do you call ur boy obama? a communist. i mean id rather have a fascist anyday of the week then a commie. your a fucking idiot tho if you actually believe that about romney...apparently being patriotic is called "fascism" yes i know that nationalism is a part of fascism but still having pride in ones country is not a bad thing and its what we should all have..did you see what this guy did at the olympics? he erased its entire debt. GREATEST MAN OF ALL TIME
CanYouSayPerfect 3 years ago
What the hell are you talking about? I don't support Obama at all. He IS a fascist nut because he proposes fascist things. I discuss that further down, as well as the fact that I'm a Libertarian. Seems like you need some reading glasses and maybe a slap in the face.
ebaofvn 3 years ago
ROMNEY ROCKS!
Young008 3 years ago
Q: What does Mitt have a skull of in place of brains?
A: (see above comment)
ebaofvn 3 years ago
You know, "MITT" isn't his real name.
drummer703 3 years ago
I didn't know that until recently. But oh well... it doesn't change the fact that he is a fascist nut.
ebaofvn 3 years ago
Really? tell me what it is about him that makes him a fascist.
drummer703 3 years ago
His policies. More specifically his policies regarding public privacy (monitoring American phone calls to "prevent terrorism" when terrorists know this and use disposable cell phones), voting to repeal Habeas Corpus and Posse Comitatus, supporting corporate-run but militarily-backed shadow democracies like Iraq (and he wants to do with Iran) (that's the type of thing Mussolini did) and I could go on and on and on. Many of the very things he mentions in the unedited version of this ad.
ebaofvn 3 years ago
And for the record, I'm no fan of Hillary or Obama or Edwards either. I'm a Libertarian.
So, basically, I'm interested in freedom because freedom is the only true path to security. Lack of freedom (as Mitt and his ilk have so frequently tried to foist upon the public) actually leads to less security. If my government imprisons or kills me, I'm just as imprisoned or dead as if a terrorist did it.
ebaofvn 3 years ago
Most of the politicians these days seem to be using the Bill of Rights, Constitution and all the basics of what we built this country upon to wipe their Ass. Read 1984. Despite what your high school teach told you, it's not about Communism. It's about fascism. And that's the direction we head closer to every day. Just look at how many times the reasons behind the Iraq war changed: WMD's, terrorism, liberation, Saddam was just a bad man. We actually have a Department of Misinformation. Seriously.
ebaofvn 3 years ago
I mean, we're not talking about a small case for his push to fascism.
We're talking about limitations on free speech, ability to gather (part of the Patriot Act) and much, much more. It's a scary time for our country, and it parallels the time in World War II when Italy realized what they had become. You might want to read up on that too. It's eerily similar to our own current decisions being made by our elected leaders like Mitt.
ebaofvn 3 years ago
...WELL BRACE YOURSELVES...IF JOHN MACAIN WHO HAS AN AGGRESSIVE FORM OF SKIN CANCER THAT CAN COME BACK PICS ROMNEY , A MORMON AS HIS RUNNING MATE AND WINS THE ELECTION THEN WE MAY JUST HAVE A MORMON A BREATH AWAY FROM THE WHITE HOUSE AFTER ALL WEARING HIS MAGIC MORMON UNDERWEAR WITH THOSE SAME WACKY KOOKY BELIEFS...scary...
dimtry19 3 years ago
pure hilarity
polosaint 3 years ago
love.
not a romney fan, not against him either. this is just kinda funny.
LatterDayDiaries 3 years ago
whoever posted this doesn't believe in free speech? wow
insanity2insanity 3 years ago
Uh... where do you guys get this shit? Do you watch a different video then this one here and go comment on this one instead?
ebaofvn 3 years ago
Eh, pathetic nonsense, why are you attacking the guy because of his faith and placing such bull in his mouth.
alonadel 3 years ago
I didn't say anything about Mormonism in any of the video. I attacked him for wanting to violate my rights and freedoms for something that won't even provide security and all of his deeds done in the name of semi-racist jingoism.
Don't read into things that are not there.
ebaofvn 3 years ago
Mitt Romney is such a fucknut!
CCVanderbilt 3 years ago 6
he is not a good man he's a rich, ruthless businessman who is out of touch with the people of this country
Jacon14 3 years ago 11
sunshine go get help you need it
Jacon14 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is terrible! How could anyone create such a farse as this video! Obviously it was edited and it was not the real commercial! But WOW! People these days! It's sickening what one will do in fear to make someone else...(who is a good Christian man) look badly!...sad... just sad.
shrunkensunshine 3 years ago
it's spelled farce.... and read the description, dumbass.
speakerspeaker2 3 years ago 5
What's embarrassing to me is how, even though this is edited, everything mentioned here is still stuff that Mitt believes, yet people like you try and defend it.
One thing I'm certainly not doing is misrepresenting the man: break it down.
Does he want to police the world? YES!
Does he want to monitor innocent Americans? YES!
Does he want to increase our nuclear capability? YES!
So, seriously, what am I saying that he doesn't already say? That he's fighting a war on intelligence?
Well he is.
ebaofvn 3 years ago
I never defended Mitt. Shrunkensunshine was whining about it. Personally, I hate Mitt and agree with you that this is his actual message: stay in an unnessecary war that is costing us a fortune and, as you said, police the world, monitor the calls America makes, and increase our nuclear program. I'm sorry for not being clear enough in my first comment.
speakerspeaker2 3 years ago 3
Yeah... my reply was to them, not you. I understood that. Sorry for the confusion.
ebaofvn 3 years ago
I AGREE U GUYS NEED TO BACK OFF!
ashleytluvsme 3 years ago
this is more true than his original commercial. God Save America, we are entering our darkest hour
tomkingsays 3 years ago 5
This is hilarious.
bulbheadmyass 3 years ago 3
Real Mitt comedy
/watch?v=wGf87FDN9L0
dnlchisholm 3 years ago 4
if they re-enstate the draft they'll take my brother
i cant imagine my life without him i dont want him to go.its my biggest fear
if i was drafted i wouldnt go if i dont beleive in something im not going to fight for it and they cant make me.
chemeicalsreacted 3 years ago 6
mitt romney rules just wait until hillary or barrack wins!
Dd4j6 3 years ago
lol
SabreTooth123 4 years ago
All those Mitt Romney voters just voted for a cheat and a quitter. I am not surprised Mittens Romney dropped out. Thank God. What a fake he was.
patriciaoday 4 years ago
this is AWESOME
oddjob29 4 years ago
AND QUIT GIVING US THE FINGER.
themarkmarcus 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Mitt Romney appears to be choking bigtime tonight. That's too bad, I was looking forward to watching him get beaten like a redheaded stepchild this November.
But the good news is that douchebags like Limbaugh, Coulter and Hannity must be having strokes.
elperropatron 4 years ago
YEA ROMNEY FOR PRESIDERNT
yatell23 4 years ago
ok stupidass... Mitt stands for Mitchell. Its better than idiotic names like shaquisha and lebron and Keyshawm. second this is horrible. it looks like a translated japenese cartoon. i admit, even as a Romney supporter that this would be pretty good if it was done well.
DoghouseFilms 4 years ago
No, Mitt is his middle name. His first name is Willard, but Willard sounds ridiculous, so he goes by Mitt, which is slightly less ridiculous.
todaystomsawyer 4 years ago
Its pretty pathetic that you have to edit his add to make him look bad.
accordscantdrift 4 years ago
This man is the biggest FAKE I have ever seen in national politics in my life, and I've seen 'em come and I've seen 'em go since the 1960's. This man will do or say anything to get elected. He plays dirty, he thinks he can buy an election. Of all the candidates on either side this year he revolts me the most.
patriciaoday 4 years ago