I'm not scared of marriage. No,i'm absolutely terrified. That terrified feeling you get when you missed or just got off a plane and see it on the news minutes later as a burning wreck with no survivors. Women,you don't want this,already i'm seeing a generation of young really beautiful women having major trouble and are becoming really desperate for boyfriends let alone full relationships and the one before them are growing old,bitter,and dying alone.
@TheWarbirdPhoenix PISS OFF!...LEAVE COMMENTS LIKE THAT ON FEMALE SITES, AS YOU ARE NOT WELCOME HERE!
U R ONLY HERE BECAUSE, AS A FEMALE, UR NATURALLY CURIOUS, WHICH CAN BE MOST UNHEALTHY AND HAS BEEN FOR OTHERWISE, DECENT GALS WHOM STEPPED IN AREAS THE SHOULD NOT HAVE WENT INTO FROM THE START.
FEMALES COME ON THIS SITE BECAUSE THEY ARE PISSED OFF THAT MEN AR WAKING UP AND THEIR BULLSHIT GAMES, NOW HAVE TO BE REVAMPED FOR FEAR OF BEING COMLETELY EXPOSED 4 THE LIARS WOMEN R!
It’s a bad idea for a woman to go for the divorce – sure she’ll get half his kingdom and child support payments (if any) but why not have it all – and a man? A nice guy, I know, really got taken (common law marriage, which is about equally as legally binding). His ex had acquired a new boyfriend at the time (who knows how long they’ll stay together?) but still he got F’cked. I met his ex and I wouldn’t touch her with a ten foot pole. Some guys have bad taste in women or are too desperate.
This is so funny! Just downplay your job and income and watch her run. I did this and it worked – but no problem – next! Sooner or later I hope to find a woman with some honest warmth.
Ouch! That last statement really hurt, since I am a girl. The only way you have a chance in marriage is if you find a woman that makes her own money and is actually rational. Oh wait, she doesn't exist, don't do it! Kudos to you for informing the public about the mistreatment of men in divorce, but do not label me. My mother is actually the president of US Carlson Restaurants (TGI Fridays), but my father takes care the house. Type in Anita Phillips on google. Remember, she's the one with TGIF.
@FunUsernamesAreGone THIS IS A SITE FOR MEN NOT DELUDED, MANIPULATIVE, ANAL RETENTIVE, UNDERMINING, DECEPIVE, LYING *&^ LIKE YOU..
THE PREZ OF CARLSON, OH GEE!.....SHE DID NOT CREATE IT, SO FUCK OFF!
ANOTHER FEMALE REAPING THE REWARDS THAT MEN HAVE ORIGINALLY CREATED SO BITCHES CAN MANIPULATE THEIR WAY IN AND WITH SOME CHANG, MAKE A GIANT DEAL OUT OF IT!
WOMEN ARE LIKE THE JAPANESE, IN THAT, THEY ARE FANTASTIC AT TAKING A PRODUCT "WHICH WAS INVENTED ALREADY" AND COPY IT!
preaching to the converted here .... i am stunned how stupid most guys are and how so many still bother to get married.
what the fuck is so appealing about a contract with the government ...... i dont get it. we dont have contracts with our friends and family ...... WTF is wrong with people
Women will always change after they get the ring, never co-sign anything with a woman, watch out for marriage fraud with illegal immigrants, avoid long distance relationships, don't live together, never get married, avoid single mothers with kids still at home/it's a package deal, invest at least 10% of your income instead of spending it on women, educate other men about Tom Leykis, always use condoms, be less interested in her, never sign anything legal with a woman, use coupons when dining.
I'm a bit of a loner and I'm probably NEVER going to get married. Marriage is not a decision to be taken lightly. However, marriage is not just about the money. Even if you do get divorced in the end, you might've lived happily for years before that happens (imagine if you have children!). And this video neglects several benefits of marraige; tax breaks, social acceptance, NOT BEING ALONE (which is unhealthy besides being not comfortable).
You know whats funny? the fact that you said more than half of you will end up in divorce court and then i remember that the current statistics for american divorces is like 53%. damn its so true!
Don't get married. Ever. Look at the statistics. She will hate you. She will nag you. She will fuck other guys. She will divorce you and take everything you have. She will destroy you.
Here’s an inspiring story of a man who, in 1930, demonstrated for the right to be a father father in Washington D.C. It is the earliest case of a public father’s rights protest I know of. James Welch: The Father Who Would Not Give Up” (with photos that will surprise you) @ The Unknown History of MISANDRY
1981 Buick Skylarks are collectors items! Seriously though, I agree with this video. My advice to all unmarried men has for years been "don't". Humans are not naturally monogamous. We are naturally serially monogamous, with the average serious relationship lasting about 7 years.
I love this guy. His essays are brilliant and absolutely true. Women wonder why we don't want to get married. My answer is, too much work, repsonsibility, heartache with little or no payback. What we need to do, to prevent self delusion regarding marriage, is to legalize prostitution. Make it so, any women can do it and increase the competition so it will be a reasonable service. At least then we can think with the head above our shoulders.
Family courts are for breaking up families and De-balling males..
Women are paying thier own way to con a man in to believing that she does.. Until he gets her pregnant or marries her, then she will take him to the cleaners
One of the best vids on youtube. Way more truth than many men want to face, unfortunately. "Never underestimate the power of denial." Amen. If your eye has too much control over you, pluck it out. If your penis has too much control over you, whack it off.
I believe that this video ought to be dipped in platinum, and coated with crushed diamonds and rubies because there is probably few videos on youtube, and none to surpass this one that deals with the subject at hand, that rings with such depths of truth. I wish the world and everyone in it, from the craddle to the grave could hear this video. This guy has painted a master piece of truth, he has dotted every (I), and crossed every (T). I love the descriptive passion in his voice . Platinum.
It's a two way street. Often times the men make the relationship fall apart, and often times it's the women. Unfortunately the courts don't take that into consideration and only listen to the angry woman.
I think what people should take away from this is to make good decisions, and that means making sure both the man and the woman in the relationship love each other, and that they know they might have to work through things. This guy sounds like he was shafted, and now he's just sour about it.
After my last divorce, I ended up living in a van, in a church lot, for about 1 & 1/2 years. I previously had 23 acres and a new house in Alabama. I like the way this guy tells it like it is.
This is good advice but not just for men but women as well. They are better served in life to earn their own way. Pursuing more interesting things than so called love which is too me personally a fairy tale and kind of boring when compared to the books I could be reading, or digital art, and design I could be learning. Less people getting married and having children is a good thing! Wish I had known that earlier. Though I do make the best of my life as is. =)
@AlorenNS Actually, less people getting married and having children is not a good thing. It's a problem, and a bad problem at that. It is a symptom of something larger that most MRAs, unlike myself, don't really address because they don't really want to right now. Marriage is broken because marriage is no longer an equitable relationship (note, I didn't say equal, there is no such thing as equality), and this is bad because it is the basis for the Family itself.
@MaxxTheMerciless It is important to stress this point Right now, the family is disintegrating, and that is not a good thing for anyone. The more families dissolve, the more people turn to government for their needs, and that is by design. Families are the best representation of self-reliance, personal power, and security of the individual, and without it you get more crime, more problems, and more dependence on govt., which leads to a tyrannical regime (as we actually do today).
Oh, now God made you a sneak and a criminal. Figures. Answer your own question asshole. I don't do anything but piss on bullies. Now fuck off and die.
@bracebuddy1 Sometimes being rude is the only means of driving the point across, tip toeing around peoples emotions, afraid of hitting a nerve, is not going to get through to some people.
I think its ok to be rude now and then when its necessary.
If this was a response to his conversation with justatrolling, take notice that justatrolling got rude first and TheHappyMisogynist simply responded in spades. You may like being pushed around by cyber bullies, but he doesn't and I sure as hell don't.
@ManSpeakOut oh well i didn't notice the "justatrolling" person being rude first.. but still doesn't it seem like the other person is being a little mean? i mean he/she said "fuck off and die" that's pretty mean.. anyway i'm not saying people should walk on eggshells or anything.. but there's no need to be mean.. right??
@therealjammit For you, it is. It's not so much that you actually know anything, but that you've simply made up your mind. I doubt, though, like any other atheist, you have the courage to back up your conviction.
@therealjammit I'm trying to see if you have the guts to prove your conviction. Your life has no meaning, but I doubt you've even thought about what you believe that far out. So, just take it to the next logical step, since you're so certain. Kill yourself. You'll only be saving yourself a lot of pain.
@LOLCLV I don't want to commit suicide. My life has meaning because I enjoy living it. Committing suicide makes no sense for me. It would mean giving up on the things in life I enjoy the most and is therefore illogical to me. Life is not painful to me. Do you have proof or verifiable evidence for god?
@therealjammit But, you will live, and you will die, and your life will count for nothing. So what's the point of living? What's the point of being alive? For pleasure? Why bother having children? Why bother doing anything that might involve you doing something that doesn't involve your personal pleasure? While we're talking about it, why make any laws at all? What's the point? Just because YOU say it has meaning?
Yes, I do have proof. But you see, that would require some thought.
@LOLCLV My life will count for something, even if that matters to anybody else but myself. The point of living is that I want to live. The point to being alive is that I want to live. I enjoy life because of the pleasures it gives me. I want children because I would enjoy having a family. If I do something I don't enjoy, it's because the future benefits outweigh the immediate gratification. I follow and help make laws that allow me to enjoy my life without being harmed by others.
@therealjammit No, it won't. Because that's all subjective to other people's opinion. That means if I think you're worthless, with the power to back it up, then you are worthless, in spite of whatever merit you think you have, because merit is also subjective. I have tons of proof of the God, the proof that your life has value, and it is you,and all around you. You just don't WANT to see it. Because you're comfortable with it. For now.
@LOLCLV My life is, by definition, my responsibility. I choose life. This is not subjective, but an opinion, much like "you're worthless" is an opinion. Do you have proof of god?
@therealjammit Yes, I do. Lots of it. It's all around you, and you are part of it. But, do you want to see it? Your life is your responsibility, true, but to what purpose?
Without God, you have no Purpose. Whatever you think it is, is purely subjective to another's whim; to suit their purpose. Otherwise, what's the point? Pleasure? That's all you have to live for, and then what? Nothingness.
I know you'll try to wrangle out of all that, My question to you is, why bother?
@LOLCLV What I see around me is explained by science. If you want me to pin it down, the purpose of my life is to remain alive and breed, as has been embedded in my genes as my ancestors evolved this as a trait. This is purpose without god. Pleasure is the description of things we find positive to our traits. This is why I bother. Do you have proof of god?
@therealjammit Rather than try to rationalize what I just typed, why don't you think about it? How can it hurt? If you think that it has merit, you only have your immortal soul to gain. If not, you've lost nothing.
@LOLCLV I've been thinking about what you've said since we've started. Thinking about it won't hurt, and it doesn't. There is no god in the universe without proof, there is no soul without proof. I have nothing to lose to begin with. To follow a belief system without proof or testable evidence is to blindly follow any path. Do you have proof of god?
@therealjammit But there is proof. You have not thought about it. You've only thought what you want to think. God is beyond that. He isn't subject to what people think about Him. You want to think about it and you're clinging to a purely emotional and material argument, not a rational one. All things in this universe has a Necessary Cause. That is a fact. If you choose not to believe that, that is irrational.
@LOLCLV Truth is verifiable and testable. If god is outside anything verifiable and testable, then god isn't a truth. I am clinging to a material argument, but not out of emotion. A rational argument is one that can be proven, tested, and verified by outside sources. The necessary cause for me involves no god, and science can be tested. Choosing to believe in something that can't be tested and verified is not proof.
@therealjammit One proof of God's existence is your own. Science doesn't even know what Life is. Engineers and scientists cannot reproduce it from scratch. They cannot account for it. Even DNA doesn't account for it. That's scientific fact. And then there's the cosmological arguments; that it's entirely too improbable for all of us to exist, let alone you, with what we need to survive the way we do. But no. Go on with your delusions. We're an accident. It's what you want to believe.
@LOLCLV Life is the description we have given to things that have the ability to reproduce and adapt to changing conditions. Science hasn't created life from non-life. Yet. DNA is the engine of life, therefore it does account for life.
@therealjammit Science will never create life from non-life Ever. Because there is no way for science to even know why anything lives at all. It never will, because the answer to that lies outside the material realm of understanding.
@LOLCLV The universe is very large. The chance of anything happening is very probable. These aren't delusions, but science. I do believe in facts from evidence that's been tested and verified, and we're no accident. We're the culmination of small changes over a long time. Do you have proof of god?
@therealjammit Yes, actually, I do have proof. And no, we are not the culmination of small changes over a long time. There is actually no proof of that. Fossils do not prove parent-descendant relationships. But, that's somewhat beside the point; because whatever I might show you as proof you probably won't accept because you just don't want to.
@LOLCLV Both fossil records and DNA sequencing have proven that we are descended from an earlier primate. This is proof. I've never heard of parent-descendant relationship used outside of describing the similarities of offspring to their parent. I'm still waiting for proof of god. Verifiable and testable evidence is proof.
@therealjammit No they have not. DNA sequencing has not shown anything of the sort. You are perpetuating a myth. Never in the history of the world has there EVER been shown one species emerging from another. EVER. That is SCIENCE. Not even your hero Dawkins can dispute that. But he will try to fool you, as he has already done, by claiming that microevolution in the form of selective breeding is evidence for Darwinism. It is not. Even so, it is not evidence for the lack of God.
@LOLCLV Finches are one example of observable evolution. Another is junk DNA code being shared with other animals. Reactivating existing DNA in chickens gave them their teeth back, just like their fossil ancestors. Prof. Dawkins has used ring species to defend evolution. None of this is proof that god doesn't exist, just not necessary.
@therealjammit Also, it isn't verifiable and testable. Do your own research. Sorry, but you've bought into a lot of nonsense that tries to pass as science. It isn't. How do you measure or observe something that hasn't happened. Ever. How do you do that? If there was a new species emerging from an existing one, we'd see evidence of that by now, right? Plus, the fossil record doesn't hold to what the Darwinists claim it ought to be, and they hem and haw over this.
@LOLCLV If something hasn't happened, then it doesn't exist. Unicorns have never happened and they don't exist. We do have species evolving in front of us. As a small example, we have seen ring species happen in front of us. We have bred fruit flies and mice into different species, some that actually have patents. Scientists agree on evolution and see no problems with the fossil record.
@therealjammit Here's a question for you. Without answering a question with a question, as atheists are wont to do, what proof, or evidence, can you provide that atheism is accurate and correct?
@therealjammit What's more important, really, for you? To fuck yourself silly; to inebriate yourself, to have orgies and get stoned and whatever and have nobody judge you for that? Is that what you want? Well, you know what? Christianity will let you. Go right ahead. But, that is not freedom. When you finally grow up (hopefully sooner and not later), you'll learn. But you don't want to.
God exists outside of our world so that we are not enamored by His miracles.
@LOLCLV Personally, I have no need to fuck myself silly, get drunk, or do drugs. I am judged by laws that have been put in place and others who opinion I respect. These social morals have evolved over time. This doesn't require a god. Freedom is to do as one chooses to do. To do only what you're told for reasons that are undefined is not freedom. There are no miracles. Do you have proof of god?
@therealjammit Social morals are discovered. They do not evolve. And Freedom is not to do as one chooses to do. It is to do what he Ought to do. There is a huge difference.
And yes, there are miracles. But, you don't want to see anything as a miracle. There are documented miracles that have taken place, but you don't want to see it.
What's the point, for you, to keep reproducing? To what end? What's the point? To live, and then die? Why put anyone through that?
@LOLCLV Social morals are variable. Each society has its own moral code. As a society grows, so do its morals. Freedom is free to do as one chooses, morality is what one chooses to follow. I haven't witnessed, read, or viewed any claimed miracle that couldn't be proven with statistical analysis. If you have a certain miracle in mind, please tell me. I want to see it. The point for me is to do as I see fit to do, to follow my genetic code that has worked for so many centuries.
@therealjammit No they are not. No society thinks murder is acceptable. Every society treats women generally different and deferential than men do. As well as Children. It takes the stupidity of an atheist not to see that. I'm sorry, but that's the truth. There may be variations, but history, sociology, and just basic observations shows that.
@LOLCLV Islam allows the stoning of women who have been raped. African head hunters actually think murder is socially acceptable. The bible allows slaves. In Singapore girls as young as 13 are allowed to marry anybody. These are not only variations, but sometimes gross definitions of society.
@LOLCLV The point of anything is to be decided by the individual that's making the point. The point for me is to enjoy life. If I say it has meaning to me, then it has meaning to me. Do you have proof of god?
@LOLCLV Previous message deleted to correct spelling error. All there is in the universe is all there is. There is nothing more than the universe to be the universe. All parts of the universe exist and function without proof or need of a god. If there were proof of a god, there would be no atheists. If there were proof of no god, there would be no theists. Do you have proof of god?
@justatrolling so... you can hack other people's profiles but you can't figure out how to get videos you don't like out of your recommendations? lol.
here's a protip, buddy: don't watch the ones you know you don't like - instantly click on the "X" near them. also, when you see a video you don't like, press dislike, so youtube will aknowledge you don't want to see related videos on suggestion. in 1-3 months you should be clean. also, when you comment them, YT thinks you liked it.
Does everyone think that this 'court' position wasn't thoroughly thought out? Really? Are we that naive? Has anyone heard the term 'divide and conquer'? Our society is falling apart because we are oblivious to a complete but subversive attack on societiy. The bombardment is lobbed by the media and aimed at our souls. Turn off the tv....stop reading the paper. Stop buying corporate crap to feed your growing empty feelings. STOP this shit. Stop it and think. . and Watch YouTube!!! Peace
@TheHappyMisogynist I totally agree, never ever get married or even move in with someone. Keep educating the men on marriage/dating and I do the same with the women.By the time we are both done educating both sex no one will be dating or getting married.
If a guy listens to this, well, and reads "women" by Charles Bukowski, and has had unpaid sex with at least 30 women, and then wants to get married, he has my respect. But I think this makes up a minority of grooms.
@TheRealSmacker Not me. That only shows he's no better then a woman.whoring around is the most dumbest thing any person can do. once either sex does what you mentioned they will always do it, married or not.As I alway say once a whore, always a whore.
@Zain844 lol...she was probably a nutcase anyway. Women have every excuse in the world and say that you don't listen to them because well NO ONE else will...because the are crazy...Just make sure you got your Pre-Nut agreement in place if you cross the marriage line.
@jchaberdashlol he's defensive because he knows she's right? That's no different then the argument that chrisitan apologists use to shame atheists. That atheists are all sinners and know god exsists but they reject god so they can keep sinning.
Thank God I heard this.. over the weekend I've been watching your videos and my eyes have now been fully opened. I always sensed there was something wrong and now I believe I know what it is. I'm a 27yr victim of feminist social programming. Thank you.
I like many of your videos and I agree with much of this one. However, please stop quoting that false statistic that half of all marriages end in divorce. That is simply not true. It is arrived at by comparing the number of divorces in a given year with the number of marriages. Look at the death rate and you'll see it. There were approximately 4 million births in the U.S. and 2.4 million deaths in 2000. Clearly the death rate wasn't 60% then. Yet that is exactly how the 50% myth is calculated.
If you have sources that contradict conventional wisdom on the divorce rate, please post. You analogy was off base. I didn't calculate in the way you implied.
@TheHappyMisogynist Ok. If I have misconstrued how you arrived at that statistic then I apologize. However, that IS clearly the statistic most people are referring to when they say that. So if you will describe from where or how you arrived at your stated statistic of 50% divorce rate, I'll be happy to post mine. A useful divorce rate stat will tell a given man what his chances are today. You have to consider race, age, generation, etc. There is no one number that will satisfy all people.
@salaciousBastard Notice he never responded to you on how he arrived at that divorce rate so you needn't apologize. It is obvious that you're not going to get an answer because he went on Wikipedia or some other area and is just repeating misinformation. Your calculations are more than likely correct.
@rainbowbrainhead you think they are correct because you are cherrypicking what you want to be correct.
He's provided no sources to back any of his calcuations so his numbers aren't anymore reliable then Paul's even if the divorece rate isn't 50% you are failing to account for all those marriages were people are unhappily married. Keep in mind a marriage doesn't have to end in divorce to be a failure and did it occur to you that divorce rates are down because marriage rates are down?
@Zain844 No I'm not cherry picking. What I want instead of people hiding behind a bunch of miscalculations and stats, is the find the real truth and humanity behind it all because you don't get that from a channel that is nothing more than propaganda from someone who's a misogynist. If the vid is already slanted and biast, where are you getting? Yeah, I'm already aware that divorce rates are down because marriage rates are down. Is the Happy Misogynist aware of it?
@rainbowbrainhead hiding behind miscalcualtions and stats right.... but when people you agree with do it it's okay then? Despite his handle on YT , Paul Elam is actually not a real misogynist if you go to his website or listen to his radio show. but even if he was it has no bearing on the validity of his points. Simply calling him a misogynist does'nt mean you've refuted him.
@Zain844 I called him what he is and yes I've seen his vids, and read the 'reason' he states he calls himself that, etc. etc. I never said he didn't have any points, however, let's call an apple an apple shall we? He still IS a misogynist & no that doesn't mean some of his stats may be off. I'm sure Hitler thought he had a point too but that doesn't mean I have to agree with what he did either. My point was & still IS, someone asked him to list how he came up with something & and he did not.
@rainbowbrainhead and again whether or not he is a misogynist is completely irrelevant to the validity of his points. Therefore other then to attack his character, there is no other reason to bring it up. Christian apologists and would try to discredit Charles Darwin by calling him a sexist, and a racist. even if it was true how does that disprove his points? Paul's stats may have been overexaggerated, but not by much. Divorce rates are still in the 45-50% range in most areas.
@Zain844 so let's put it is another way -Paul is saying that feminists, which are MOSTLY female, have a lot of bad character traits that make them supposedly inferior partners. Why is it o.k. to be so dismissive about Charles Darwin's bad character traits (your example) but others don't get let off the hook that easily? and you thought I was the cherry picker.
@Zain844 Because I was interested in what he had to say. I've already said that just because someone is right on some of their stats doesn't mean they aren't what they are. In this guy's case HE IS A MISOGYNIST.It's funny to me how character supposedly is totally dismissed by some people: for example politicians may be very smart and have some valid points on things but some of them can't keep it in their pants. If a female was a politician she would immediately be discredited as a slut.
@rainbowbrainhead Females don't want to be politicians it has nothing to do with them being discredited or treated unfairly. For every woman who wants to be a politician there are 10 men who also want to be politicians. Women just don't want to do it. . again even if he really is a misogynist what is your point? That is not adding anything to the discussion. His character has nothing to do with the validity of his arguments why is that so hard to understand?
@rainbowbrainhead it's not that you disagree with him it's that you are getting emotional and if his vids upset you that much then perhaps you should not watch them. Disagreenments are fine but you seen to have a personal problem with Paul Elam.
@Zain844 I'm not emotional. Just one more so called 'character flaw' that some men attempt to shame women with: you're emotional. I disagree with him and that's that. I'm no more emotional over these videos than you are. I dont have a personal problem with Paul Elam. I'm stating my opinion which is he's a misogynist and clearly he is. Perhaps if you cannot tolerate criticism, you shouldn't attempt any discussions on this forum.
@rainbowbrainhead First of all, I never said anything about you having character flaws you did. Secondly I wasnt trying to shame you and third of all I had no idea you were a man or a woman. You are getting awfully defensive aren't you? It's not that you are critisizing Paul Elam that I have a problem with. It's that you are not offering anything else to this discussion. If you disagree with him please explain why. Instead of just repeating over and over again that he is a misogynist.
@Zain844 Please, it is obvious I'm a female. First you accuse me of being emotional and now you accuse me of being defensive which I find ironic because you've been defensive in this whole exchange saying I'm judging someone and if I'm so upset why am I watching these vids and I have personal problems with Paul Elam so why are YOU being so defensive? Why do you keep repeating yourself? I was offering to the discussion until you went off topic and personalizing everything.
@rainbowbrainhead How is it obvious? it's not stated anywhere in your profile. I am not being defensive Paul Elam doesn't need anyone to defend him. Secondly I am simply being logical you keep saying he is a misogynist like that's the only thing you can say to refute the points he makes in his vids. i am trying (and failing apparently) to explain to you that whethher or not he is a misogynist is irrelevant. Please tell me why he is wrong. you seen incapable of being able to do that
I'm a misogynist. I'm proud of it. The irony is that there is a class of women out there who find that very attractive. --a man who won't kiss your ass and suck up to all your bullshit is apparently a real catch.
Misogynist is just another word women use to shame men into be disposable commodities for their benefit. The moment you hold yourself above that is the moment they are forced to respect you.
@gamenode Are you sure you're a misogynist and not just a chauvanist? Aren't misogynists by definiton men who hate women? and if it's just a word that women use to shame men then why use it? why call yourself a misogynist??
Because by owning the word they can't use it as a weapon to shame me or other men. Women have slut walks because they want the term to be empowering. So I'm a misogynist and because I use the word as empowering other men won't be afraid to go against feminist hatred of men.
I am not a chauvinist--quite the opposite. I believe women have used reproductive tyranny to control and exploit men. As a result women's feelings are more important than men's lives. This is not equality.
@gamenode by sluts owning the word it just boils down to "im a slut respect me" i just dont buy it. aside from that i agree with pretty much everything you say.
But there is more than that Zain. I reject the notion that I "have" to like women or respect women or even help women in any way. Women should be expected to earn respect and affection and the sympathy of others rather than feeling entitled to it because they have a vagina. If a man must earn status to be afforded basic respect and human dignity then so should women. No more pussy passes. If men can be losers then so can women. If that makes me a misogynist then so be it.
@gamenode but does that really make you a misogynist? I agree with everything you say actually, all a woman has to do to get respect is just bat her eyelashes where as men have to actaully EARN IT by getting a good job getting status getting his "shit together" howevever you want to put it. i to reject the notion that men are just disposable and utilitarian especially now that women have pretty much the same opportunuties that men do. No man has any obligation to care of a woman.
And let me ask you this Rainbowhead--why should men like women? What do you do for us? How have you helped men in this world? Do you stop when we our cars break down on the side of the road? Do you die for us in combat? Do you rush in to burning buildings for us? Or do you promote a legals systems which denies us equal parental and reproductive rights? Do you sit quietly and do nothing when this happens?
Misogynist is a person who recognizes that women harm/abuse men.
Actually it's usually the female politician's husband who gets the scrutiny.
At any rate, it is YOUR opinion that Paul is a misogynist. Having stated your opinion you should focus on the facts of the discussion. All you are doing is using ad hominem to discredit him rather than attacking his argument. This is what women have been doing for centuries. Using their words to devalue men so they could get men to do what they wanted.
@Zain844 Also, I find it ironic that you would question why I'm even here. If the dude only wants to 'preach to the choir' then why do a fucking video? I don't understand why people ask a question like that. Don't other people like to hear about different points of views or is it just me? We should only watch videos we agree on. If that's the case, we shouldn't have any thumbs down options on the videos.
If you are an MRA then you willingly accept a variety of opinions and debate because there is no "one" voice here. But if you come at us with outright denial and promoting a feminist pedagogy then you will rightly be called out for it. We've all lost patience with women who compete against us in every facet of life and then act victimized when we have the gall to compete right back. Feminists want men as slaves. This is there "equality".
@rainbowbrainhead (continued) It is just another common shaming tactic. and Paul is actually aware that marriage rates are down. He even talks about it in another video about how trust between males and females is at an all time low and how less and less people are getting married most likely because they KNOW it's a bad idea. If they got married they would get divorced and the divorce rates would go up again. The logic is not that hard to follow. People are already avoiding the institution
@rainbowbrainhead and since divorce rates often vary from place to place its hard to pin down what the exact divorce rate percentage is however many statistics and census groups have "ballparked" it around 40 to 50 percent. it may be lower in some other areas but in most areas it's ATLEAST around 40-46 percent. So Paul is off by a few percent. Sue him.
I am a very busy man. I do this channel, a busy website, and a radio show. So if I don't answer anyone it is likely I got sidetracked. Go to divorce rate dot org and you will see this:
The divorce rate in America for first marriage, vs second or third marriage
50% percent of first marriages, 67% of second and 74% of third marriages end in divorce, according to Jennifer Baker of the Forest Institute of Professional Psychology in Springfield, Missouri.
@TheHappyMisogynist That information can easily be found on Wikipedia and Yahoo answers but that doesn't mean it's as reliable as some may think it is...I've alreadys seen that information actually and didn't need you to clarify it for me. My post was in reference that someone two months ago asked you how you arrived at your calcuations and you didn't bother to reply so YOU should apologize to HIM and I need not apologize to you because I've done nothing wrong. Have a wonderful day.
Just what I figured. You try to chide me for nor responding fast enough with sources, implying I don't have them, then when they are posted you dismiss them because they don't reflect your POV. Like I said, I am a busy man. Have a nice life.
@TheHappyMisogynist lol someone you blocked now sent me a pm that was directed at you. I won't bother telling you what she said but its funny when you block people and they get so pissed off.
@TheHappyMisogynist Can't seem to post the links. I assume there's so prohibition against posting outside links. As I said the CDC is more in agreement with your second statistics. Also, if you go to time.com and search for this article, "Are Marriage Statistics Divorced from Reality?," it should be somewhere near the top.
@TheHappyMisogynist According the the CDC, your second statistics sound more reasonable. However, you're still taking about averages which is not telling any given man what HIS probable divorce rate is. Here is an article from Time which illustrates my point: Those married in the 70s are far more likely to divorce after 10 yrs than those married in the 90s. College grads are far less likely to be divorced after 20 yrs than less educated people.
I read that Time article. It left me more confused than before. The simple fact is though that if you get married you are agreeing to be yoked into a system where you will be obligated in all things to her and she will have no obligations to you that she cannot disregard by fiat. All your obligations will be enforced by biased courts in the event of divorce and she will be liberated from doing anything for you. In essence you are agreeing to be her property.
@TheHappyMisogynist The last thing I want to say that it was never my intention to discredit you. I only wanted a little more accuracy in your data. As I said earlier I agree with much of what you say. As a black man, even a college educated one, the odds of my having a successful marriage are far more dismal than yours, due to not only race but also my generation, etc. Please, don't assume because someone like Rainbowbrainhead "seems" to be cosigning my words that I agree with that person.
@salaciousBastard i hope your girl talkin like that, cuz if u are i have no comments 4 u but if your dude talkin like that stfu u sound like a str8 up bitch, fuck marriage nigga
Its called "cost per insertion" and my CPI has been rather extreme
baronvonaqua 2 days ago
If you absolutely have to get married, move out of the United States. Stay away from westernized countries.
marianasreality 1 week ago
I'm not scared of marriage. No,i'm absolutely terrified. That terrified feeling you get when you missed or just got off a plane and see it on the news minutes later as a burning wreck with no survivors. Women,you don't want this,already i'm seeing a generation of young really beautiful women having major trouble and are becoming really desperate for boyfriends let alone full relationships and the one before them are growing old,bitter,and dying alone.
TheWarbirdPhoenix 1 week ago
@TheWarbirdPhoenix PISS OFF!...LEAVE COMMENTS LIKE THAT ON FEMALE SITES, AS YOU ARE NOT WELCOME HERE!
U R ONLY HERE BECAUSE, AS A FEMALE, UR NATURALLY CURIOUS, WHICH CAN BE MOST UNHEALTHY AND HAS BEEN FOR OTHERWISE, DECENT GALS WHOM STEPPED IN AREAS THE SHOULD NOT HAVE WENT INTO FROM THE START.
FEMALES COME ON THIS SITE BECAUSE THEY ARE PISSED OFF THAT MEN AR WAKING UP AND THEIR BULLSHIT GAMES, NOW HAVE TO BE REVAMPED FOR FEAR OF BEING COMLETELY EXPOSED 4 THE LIARS WOMEN R!
MrSilicon605 6 days ago
thanks!
thewallmarcio120 1 week ago
It’s a bad idea for a woman to go for the divorce – sure she’ll get half his kingdom and child support payments (if any) but why not have it all – and a man? A nice guy, I know, really got taken (common law marriage, which is about equally as legally binding). His ex had acquired a new boyfriend at the time (who knows how long they’ll stay together?) but still he got F’cked. I met his ex and I wouldn’t touch her with a ten foot pole. Some guys have bad taste in women or are too desperate.
lawshorizon 2 weeks ago
This is so funny! Just downplay your job and income and watch her run. I did this and it worked – but no problem – next! Sooner or later I hope to find a woman with some honest warmth.
lawshorizon 2 weeks ago
Ouch! That last statement really hurt, since I am a girl. The only way you have a chance in marriage is if you find a woman that makes her own money and is actually rational. Oh wait, she doesn't exist, don't do it! Kudos to you for informing the public about the mistreatment of men in divorce, but do not label me. My mother is actually the president of US Carlson Restaurants (TGI Fridays), but my father takes care the house. Type in Anita Phillips on google. Remember, she's the one with TGIF.
FunUsernamesAreGone 2 weeks ago
@FunUsernamesAreGone
Didn't label you, but you are wasting your time telling me what to do anyway
TheHappyMisogynist 2 weeks ago 4
@FunUsernamesAreGone THIS IS A SITE FOR MEN NOT DELUDED, MANIPULATIVE, ANAL RETENTIVE, UNDERMINING, DECEPIVE, LYING *&^ LIKE YOU..
THE PREZ OF CARLSON, OH GEE!.....SHE DID NOT CREATE IT, SO FUCK OFF!
ANOTHER FEMALE REAPING THE REWARDS THAT MEN HAVE ORIGINALLY CREATED SO BITCHES CAN MANIPULATE THEIR WAY IN AND WITH SOME CHANG, MAKE A GIANT DEAL OUT OF IT!
WOMEN ARE LIKE THE JAPANESE, IN THAT, THEY ARE FANTASTIC AT TAKING A PRODUCT "WHICH WAS INVENTED ALREADY" AND COPY IT!
MrSilicon605 6 days ago
preaching to the converted here .... i am stunned how stupid most guys are and how so many still bother to get married.
what the fuck is so appealing about a contract with the government ...... i dont get it. we dont have contracts with our friends and family ...... WTF is wrong with people
mikesomething 3 weeks ago 4
Women will always change after they get the ring, never co-sign anything with a woman, watch out for marriage fraud with illegal immigrants, avoid long distance relationships, don't live together, never get married, avoid single mothers with kids still at home/it's a package deal, invest at least 10% of your income instead of spending it on women, educate other men about Tom Leykis, always use condoms, be less interested in her, never sign anything legal with a woman, use coupons when dining.
dontgetmarried999 3 weeks ago 4
I think to this day, this my favourite video of yours!
Stardusk 3 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
I'm a bit of a loner and I'm probably NEVER going to get married. Marriage is not a decision to be taken lightly. However, marriage is not just about the money. Even if you do get divorced in the end, you might've lived happily for years before that happens (imagine if you have children!). And this video neglects several benefits of marraige; tax breaks, social acceptance, NOT BEING ALONE (which is unhealthy besides being not comfortable).
AmokBR 1 month ago
Brilliant essayist!
wisdomtrek 1 month ago
Is it me or does he sound like Dr. Phil?
CapnAkira 2 months ago
i favorited this video. it is very insightful. thanks for this.
desipimp299 2 months ago
You know whats funny? the fact that you said more than half of you will end up in divorce court and then i remember that the current statistics for american divorces is like 53%. damn its so true!
JGvisions 2 months ago
Don't get married. Ever. Look at the statistics. She will hate you. She will nag you. She will fuck other guys. She will divorce you and take everything you have. She will destroy you.
dizzymasekela 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Here’s an inspiring story of a man who, in 1930, demonstrated for the right to be a father father in Washington D.C. It is the earliest case of a public father’s rights protest I know of. James Welch: The Father Who Would Not Give Up” (with photos that will surprise you) @ The Unknown History of MISANDRY
pkpapers 2 months ago
1981 Buick Skylarks are collectors items! Seriously though, I agree with this video. My advice to all unmarried men has for years been "don't". Humans are not naturally monogamous. We are naturally serially monogamous, with the average serious relationship lasting about 7 years.
eventhisidistaken 2 months ago
I love this guy. His essays are brilliant and absolutely true. Women wonder why we don't want to get married. My answer is, too much work, repsonsibility, heartache with little or no payback. What we need to do, to prevent self delusion regarding marriage, is to legalize prostitution. Make it so, any women can do it and increase the competition so it will be a reasonable service. At least then we can think with the head above our shoulders.
dnsmithnc 2 months ago
Family courts are for breaking up families and De-balling males..
Women are paying thier own way to con a man in to believing that she does.. Until he gets her pregnant or marries her, then she will take him to the cleaners
rogueronin82 3 months ago
AND NOW THESE FAMILY COURTS ARE IN INDIA NOW INDIAN MIDDLE CLASS MEN ARE SCREWED.
Abbadon380 3 months ago
LOOKING AT THIS ISLAM DOSENT LOOK SO BAD NOW.
Abbadon380 3 months ago
One of the best vids on youtube. Way more truth than many men want to face, unfortunately. "Never underestimate the power of denial." Amen. If your eye has too much control over you, pluck it out. If your penis has too much control over you, whack it off.
nachodaddy 3 months ago
Keep preaching, friend. You're the voice of reason.
TubBunnyChews 3 months ago in playlist More videos from TheHappyMisogynist
I believe that this video ought to be dipped in platinum, and coated with crushed diamonds and rubies because there is probably few videos on youtube, and none to surpass this one that deals with the subject at hand, that rings with such depths of truth. I wish the world and everyone in it, from the craddle to the grave could hear this video. This guy has painted a master piece of truth, he has dotted every (I), and crossed every (T). I love the descriptive passion in his voice . Platinum.
moseseseseses 4 months ago
Married Men are nothing more then state owned legal slaves
never live with a women dont even let them sleep over 1 night after you are done with her tell her to get out and go home
allhailmegatron1 4 months ago 10
wow this guy is right on point!!!! DONT GET MARRIED.!!! especially american men!!!! american woman toxic and trained to take advantage of men.
ugotpimp 4 months ago
he speaks the truth. my married buddies are in living hell right now.
moosecurrybelmont 5 months ago
Wise man :)
seyxlondon 5 months ago
It's a two way street. Often times the men make the relationship fall apart, and often times it's the women. Unfortunately the courts don't take that into consideration and only listen to the angry woman.
I think what people should take away from this is to make good decisions, and that means making sure both the man and the woman in the relationship love each other, and that they know they might have to work through things. This guy sounds like he was shafted, and now he's just sour about it.
SamuraiBatgirl 5 months ago
After my last divorce, I ended up living in a van, in a church lot, for about 1 & 1/2 years. I previously had 23 acres and a new house in Alabama. I like the way this guy tells it like it is.
moseseseseses 5 months ago 4
This is good advice but not just for men but women as well. They are better served in life to earn their own way. Pursuing more interesting things than so called love which is too me personally a fairy tale and kind of boring when compared to the books I could be reading, or digital art, and design I could be learning. Less people getting married and having children is a good thing! Wish I had known that earlier. Though I do make the best of my life as is. =)
AlorenNS 5 months ago
@AlorenNS Actually, less people getting married and having children is not a good thing. It's a problem, and a bad problem at that. It is a symptom of something larger that most MRAs, unlike myself, don't really address because they don't really want to right now. Marriage is broken because marriage is no longer an equitable relationship (note, I didn't say equal, there is no such thing as equality), and this is bad because it is the basis for the Family itself.
MaxxTheMerciless 4 months ago
@MaxxTheMerciless It is important to stress this point Right now, the family is disintegrating, and that is not a good thing for anyone. The more families dissolve, the more people turn to government for their needs, and that is by design. Families are the best representation of self-reliance, personal power, and security of the individual, and without it you get more crime, more problems, and more dependence on govt., which leads to a tyrannical regime (as we actually do today).
MaxxTheMerciless 4 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
marriage is sacred under the eyes of god, its not supposed to be easy, wish youtube would stop recommending these videos
justatrolling 6 months ago
@justatrolling
Tell God, maybe he can have a word with YouTube and fix things for you.
TheHappyMisogynist 6 months ago 17
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@TheHappyMisogynist or maby il use the gifts god gave me and hack your channel and delete all your shitty vids? yes \no?
justatrolling 6 months ago
@justatrolling
Oh, now God made you a sneak and a criminal. Figures. Answer your own question asshole. I don't do anything but piss on bullies. Now fuck off and die.
TheHappyMisogynist 6 months ago 14
@TheHappyMisogynist You're being rude..
bracebuddy1 6 months ago
@bracebuddy1 Sometimes being rude is the only means of driving the point across, tip toeing around peoples emotions, afraid of hitting a nerve, is not going to get through to some people.
I think its ok to be rude now and then when its necessary.
If this was a response to his conversation with justatrolling, take notice that justatrolling got rude first and TheHappyMisogynist simply responded in spades. You may like being pushed around by cyber bullies, but he doesn't and I sure as hell don't.
ManSpeakOut 6 months ago
@ManSpeakOut oh well i didn't notice the "justatrolling" person being rude first.. but still doesn't it seem like the other person is being a little mean? i mean he/she said "fuck off and die" that's pretty mean.. anyway i'm not saying people should walk on eggshells or anything.. but there's no need to be mean.. right??
bracebuddy1 6 months ago
@bracebuddy1 Well in most cases when someone gets rude with you first, all bets are off.
Course it does not really matter now, its said and done, talking about it is sort of redundant.
ManSpeakOut 6 months ago
@ManSpeakOut yeah lol i agree.. let's stop.
bracebuddy1 6 months ago
@TheHappyMisogynist theocrat got owned. nice.
UltraProle21 4 months ago
@TheHappyMisogynist Both of you are arguing over nothing. You're forgetting that god doesn't even exist anyway.
therealjammit 1 month ago
@therealjammit Better hope you're right.
LOLCLV 1 month ago
@LOLCLV No hope or guessing involved or required.
therealjammit 1 month ago
@therealjammit For you, it is. It's not so much that you actually know anything, but that you've simply made up your mind. I doubt, though, like any other atheist, you have the courage to back up your conviction.
LOLCLV 1 month ago
@LOLCLV Happily. There is no evidence and you won't provide evidence that can be questioned or vetted.
therealjammit 1 month ago
@therealjammit Okay. Do precisely what I tell you to do.
Kill yourself.
Right now.
If you have the guts, and you are absolutely certain that there is no God, do it.
LOLCLV 1 month ago
@therealjammit I doubt you'll do it. You have no intellectual reason whatsoever not to.
LOLCLV 1 month ago
@LOLCLV How does my death prove god?
therealjammit 1 month ago
@therealjammit I'm trying to see if you have the guts to prove your conviction. Your life has no meaning, but I doubt you've even thought about what you believe that far out. So, just take it to the next logical step, since you're so certain. Kill yourself. You'll only be saving yourself a lot of pain.
LOLCLV 1 month ago
@LOLCLV I don't want to commit suicide. My life has meaning because I enjoy living it. Committing suicide makes no sense for me. It would mean giving up on the things in life I enjoy the most and is therefore illogical to me. Life is not painful to me. Do you have proof or verifiable evidence for god?
therealjammit 1 month ago
@therealjammit But, you will live, and you will die, and your life will count for nothing. So what's the point of living? What's the point of being alive? For pleasure? Why bother having children? Why bother doing anything that might involve you doing something that doesn't involve your personal pleasure? While we're talking about it, why make any laws at all? What's the point? Just because YOU say it has meaning?
Yes, I do have proof. But you see, that would require some thought.
LOLCLV 1 month ago
@LOLCLV My life will count for something, even if that matters to anybody else but myself. The point of living is that I want to live. The point to being alive is that I want to live. I enjoy life because of the pleasures it gives me. I want children because I would enjoy having a family. If I do something I don't enjoy, it's because the future benefits outweigh the immediate gratification. I follow and help make laws that allow me to enjoy my life without being harmed by others.
therealjammit 1 month ago
@therealjammit No, it won't. Because that's all subjective to other people's opinion. That means if I think you're worthless, with the power to back it up, then you are worthless, in spite of whatever merit you think you have, because merit is also subjective. I have tons of proof of the God, the proof that your life has value, and it is you,and all around you. You just don't WANT to see it. Because you're comfortable with it. For now.
LOLCLV 4 weeks ago
@LOLCLV My life is, by definition, my responsibility. I choose life. This is not subjective, but an opinion, much like "you're worthless" is an opinion. Do you have proof of god?
therealjammit 4 weeks ago
@therealjammit Yes, I do. Lots of it. It's all around you, and you are part of it. But, do you want to see it? Your life is your responsibility, true, but to what purpose?
Without God, you have no Purpose. Whatever you think it is, is purely subjective to another's whim; to suit their purpose. Otherwise, what's the point? Pleasure? That's all you have to live for, and then what? Nothingness.
I know you'll try to wrangle out of all that, My question to you is, why bother?
LOLCLV 4 weeks ago
@LOLCLV What I see around me is explained by science. If you want me to pin it down, the purpose of my life is to remain alive and breed, as has been embedded in my genes as my ancestors evolved this as a trait. This is purpose without god. Pleasure is the description of things we find positive to our traits. This is why I bother. Do you have proof of god?
therealjammit 4 weeks ago
@therealjammit Rather than try to rationalize what I just typed, why don't you think about it? How can it hurt? If you think that it has merit, you only have your immortal soul to gain. If not, you've lost nothing.
LOLCLV 4 weeks ago
@LOLCLV I've been thinking about what you've said since we've started. Thinking about it won't hurt, and it doesn't. There is no god in the universe without proof, there is no soul without proof. I have nothing to lose to begin with. To follow a belief system without proof or testable evidence is to blindly follow any path. Do you have proof of god?
therealjammit 4 weeks ago
@therealjammit But there is proof. You have not thought about it. You've only thought what you want to think. God is beyond that. He isn't subject to what people think about Him. You want to think about it and you're clinging to a purely emotional and material argument, not a rational one. All things in this universe has a Necessary Cause. That is a fact. If you choose not to believe that, that is irrational.
LOLCLV 4 weeks ago
@LOLCLV Truth is verifiable and testable. If god is outside anything verifiable and testable, then god isn't a truth. I am clinging to a material argument, but not out of emotion. A rational argument is one that can be proven, tested, and verified by outside sources. The necessary cause for me involves no god, and science can be tested. Choosing to believe in something that can't be tested and verified is not proof.
therealjammit 4 weeks ago
@therealjammit One proof of God's existence is your own. Science doesn't even know what Life is. Engineers and scientists cannot reproduce it from scratch. They cannot account for it. Even DNA doesn't account for it. That's scientific fact. And then there's the cosmological arguments; that it's entirely too improbable for all of us to exist, let alone you, with what we need to survive the way we do. But no. Go on with your delusions. We're an accident. It's what you want to believe.
LOLCLV 4 weeks ago
@LOLCLV Life is the description we have given to things that have the ability to reproduce and adapt to changing conditions. Science hasn't created life from non-life. Yet. DNA is the engine of life, therefore it does account for life.
therealjammit 4 weeks ago
@therealjammit Science will never create life from non-life Ever. Because there is no way for science to even know why anything lives at all. It never will, because the answer to that lies outside the material realm of understanding.
LOLCLV 3 weeks ago
@LOLCLV We don't yet fully understand the code that DNA uses. It's only a matter of time.
therealjammit 3 weeks ago
@LOLCLV The universe is very large. The chance of anything happening is very probable. These aren't delusions, but science. I do believe in facts from evidence that's been tested and verified, and we're no accident. We're the culmination of small changes over a long time. Do you have proof of god?
therealjammit 4 weeks ago
@therealjammit Yes, actually, I do have proof. And no, we are not the culmination of small changes over a long time. There is actually no proof of that. Fossils do not prove parent-descendant relationships. But, that's somewhat beside the point; because whatever I might show you as proof you probably won't accept because you just don't want to.
LOLCLV 3 weeks ago
@LOLCLV Both fossil records and DNA sequencing have proven that we are descended from an earlier primate. This is proof. I've never heard of parent-descendant relationship used outside of describing the similarities of offspring to their parent. I'm still waiting for proof of god. Verifiable and testable evidence is proof.
therealjammit 3 weeks ago
@therealjammit No they have not. DNA sequencing has not shown anything of the sort. You are perpetuating a myth. Never in the history of the world has there EVER been shown one species emerging from another. EVER. That is SCIENCE. Not even your hero Dawkins can dispute that. But he will try to fool you, as he has already done, by claiming that microevolution in the form of selective breeding is evidence for Darwinism. It is not. Even so, it is not evidence for the lack of God.
LOLCLV 3 weeks ago
@LOLCLV Finches are one example of observable evolution. Another is junk DNA code being shared with other animals. Reactivating existing DNA in chickens gave them their teeth back, just like their fossil ancestors. Prof. Dawkins has used ring species to defend evolution. None of this is proof that god doesn't exist, just not necessary.
therealjammit 3 weeks ago
@therealjammit Also, it isn't verifiable and testable. Do your own research. Sorry, but you've bought into a lot of nonsense that tries to pass as science. It isn't. How do you measure or observe something that hasn't happened. Ever. How do you do that? If there was a new species emerging from an existing one, we'd see evidence of that by now, right? Plus, the fossil record doesn't hold to what the Darwinists claim it ought to be, and they hem and haw over this.
LOLCLV 3 weeks ago
@LOLCLV If something hasn't happened, then it doesn't exist. Unicorns have never happened and they don't exist. We do have species evolving in front of us. As a small example, we have seen ring species happen in front of us. We have bred fruit flies and mice into different species, some that actually have patents. Scientists agree on evolution and see no problems with the fossil record.
therealjammit 3 weeks ago
@therealjammit Here's a question for you. Without answering a question with a question, as atheists are wont to do, what proof, or evidence, can you provide that atheism is accurate and correct?
LOLCLV 3 weeks ago
@LOLCLV Proof of atheism is the lack of proof for god.
therealjammit 3 weeks ago
@therealjammit What's more important, really, for you? To fuck yourself silly; to inebriate yourself, to have orgies and get stoned and whatever and have nobody judge you for that? Is that what you want? Well, you know what? Christianity will let you. Go right ahead. But, that is not freedom. When you finally grow up (hopefully sooner and not later), you'll learn. But you don't want to.
God exists outside of our world so that we are not enamored by His miracles.
LOLCLV 4 weeks ago
@LOLCLV Personally, I have no need to fuck myself silly, get drunk, or do drugs. I am judged by laws that have been put in place and others who opinion I respect. These social morals have evolved over time. This doesn't require a god. Freedom is to do as one chooses to do. To do only what you're told for reasons that are undefined is not freedom. There are no miracles. Do you have proof of god?
therealjammit 4 weeks ago
@therealjammit Social morals are discovered. They do not evolve. And Freedom is not to do as one chooses to do. It is to do what he Ought to do. There is a huge difference.
And yes, there are miracles. But, you don't want to see anything as a miracle. There are documented miracles that have taken place, but you don't want to see it.
What's the point, for you, to keep reproducing? To what end? What's the point? To live, and then die? Why put anyone through that?
LOLCLV 3 weeks ago
@LOLCLV Social morals are variable. Each society has its own moral code. As a society grows, so do its morals. Freedom is free to do as one chooses, morality is what one chooses to follow. I haven't witnessed, read, or viewed any claimed miracle that couldn't be proven with statistical analysis. If you have a certain miracle in mind, please tell me. I want to see it. The point for me is to do as I see fit to do, to follow my genetic code that has worked for so many centuries.
therealjammit 3 weeks ago
@therealjammit No they are not. No society thinks murder is acceptable. Every society treats women generally different and deferential than men do. As well as Children. It takes the stupidity of an atheist not to see that. I'm sorry, but that's the truth. There may be variations, but history, sociology, and just basic observations shows that.
LOLCLV 3 weeks ago
@LOLCLV Islam allows the stoning of women who have been raped. African head hunters actually think murder is socially acceptable. The bible allows slaves. In Singapore girls as young as 13 are allowed to marry anybody. These are not only variations, but sometimes gross definitions of society.
therealjammit 3 weeks ago
@LOLCLV The point of anything is to be decided by the individual that's making the point. The point for me is to enjoy life. If I say it has meaning to me, then it has meaning to me. Do you have proof of god?
therealjammit 1 month ago
@LOLCLV Here's a thought that requires deep thinking. But, since the material is all that matters to you, I doubt you're capable of it.
If there were no God, there would be no atheists.
LOLCLV 1 month ago
Comment removed
therealjammit 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LOLCLV Previous message deleted to correct spelling error. All there is in the universe is all there is. There is nothing more than the universe to be the universe. All parts of the universe exist and function without proof or need of a god. If there were proof of a god, there would be no atheists. If there were proof of no god, there would be no theists. Do you have proof of god?
therealjammit 1 month ago
@justatrolling so... you can hack other people's profiles but you can't figure out how to get videos you don't like out of your recommendations? lol.
here's a protip, buddy: don't watch the ones you know you don't like - instantly click on the "X" near them. also, when you see a video you don't like, press dislike, so youtube will aknowledge you don't want to see related videos on suggestion. in 1-3 months you should be clean. also, when you comment them, YT thinks you liked it.
munizrfelipe 1 month ago
@justatrolling Are you talking about the God of the bible? If so try these words from another Paul, the apostle...
1 Corinthians 7:28 "Those who marry in this life will have trouble, I would spare you this"
Or
1 Corinthians 7:38 "The man who marries the virgin does well but he who marries her not does EVEN BETTER"
Christ himself said in Matthew 19 that those who could hear it (remaining single) should accept it.
In the future refrain from speaking for God, you didn't even capitalize his name.
embracingreality 3 months ago
The joke is right: Why are hurricanes named with girl names? Because they wipe away your house and your car.
martinbeco 7 months ago 10
I case you didn't get it, DO NOT DO IT! Take it from someone who knows, your lucky if you get the car OR the studio apartment!!!!!
tlrlml 7 months ago 2
Comment removed
pigpenthecat 7 months ago
Thank you JESUS!!!
DoctahDizzle 7 months ago
Does everyone think that this 'court' position wasn't thoroughly thought out? Really? Are we that naive? Has anyone heard the term 'divide and conquer'? Our society is falling apart because we are oblivious to a complete but subversive attack on societiy. The bombardment is lobbed by the media and aimed at our souls. Turn off the tv....stop reading the paper. Stop buying corporate crap to feed your growing empty feelings. STOP this shit. Stop it and think. . and Watch YouTube!!! Peace
drambuie1962 7 months ago
I still think marriage is good but yes all these problems are real and most couples have too many problems. Thank you for your honesty.
hypoelectron 8 months ago
@TheHappyMisogynist I totally agree, never ever get married or even move in with someone. Keep educating the men on marriage/dating and I do the same with the women.By the time we are both done educating both sex no one will be dating or getting married.
ashatbulaparanormal 8 months ago
THIS MAN IS THE TRUTH
jnixongo00 8 months ago
@jnixongo00 Exactly!
SacredSocietyAP 7 months ago
If a guy listens to this, well, and reads "women" by Charles Bukowski, and has had unpaid sex with at least 30 women, and then wants to get married, he has my respect. But I think this makes up a minority of grooms.
TheRealSmacker 8 months ago
@TheRealSmacker Not me. That only shows he's no better then a woman.whoring around is the most dumbest thing any person can do. once either sex does what you mentioned they will always do it, married or not.As I alway say once a whore, always a whore.
ashatbulaparanormal 8 months ago
My girlfriend left me because i didnt listen to her.....or something.... I can't remember I wasn't listening....
Zain844 8 months ago 32
@Zain844 lol...she was probably a nutcase anyway. Women have every excuse in the world and say that you don't listen to them because well NO ONE else will...because the are crazy...Just make sure you got your Pre-Nut agreement in place if you cross the marriage line.
SacredSocietyAP 7 months ago
@Zain844 LOL!!
dkthg 4 months ago
@Zain844 I wonder if your gf ever listened or cared about you at all in first place!
munizrfelipe 1 month ago
1+1=2
.
Maniacaish 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
just put your trust in
God, the life of this world is only temporary
iorixs 8 months ago
@jchaberdashlol he's defensive because he knows she's right? That's no different then the argument that chrisitan apologists use to shame atheists. That atheists are all sinners and know god exsists but they reject god so they can keep sinning.
Zain844 8 months ago
@Zain844
At least the atheist is more honest than the christian who preaches that god exists and keeps sinning.
gamenode 8 months ago
thanks for the advice bro.
i'm unmarried... and its a load of stuff to think about before taking the plunge.
orangedac 8 months ago
I like this guy
Nerefurian 9 months ago
Thank God I heard this.. over the weekend I've been watching your videos and my eyes have now been fully opened. I always sensed there was something wrong and now I believe I know what it is. I'm a 27yr victim of feminist social programming. Thank you.
tharemedybeats 9 months ago 2
How does this video not have a million views?
mindround 9 months ago
A piercingly accurate explanation of female psychology (Or should that be pathology?).
WilliamGruff 10 months ago
I like many of your videos and I agree with much of this one. However, please stop quoting that false statistic that half of all marriages end in divorce. That is simply not true. It is arrived at by comparing the number of divorces in a given year with the number of marriages. Look at the death rate and you'll see it. There were approximately 4 million births in the U.S. and 2.4 million deaths in 2000. Clearly the death rate wasn't 60% then. Yet that is exactly how the 50% myth is calculated.
salaciousBastard 10 months ago
@salaciousBastard
If you have sources that contradict conventional wisdom on the divorce rate, please post. You analogy was off base. I didn't calculate in the way you implied.
TheHappyMisogynist 10 months ago
@TheHappyMisogynist Ok. If I have misconstrued how you arrived at that statistic then I apologize. However, that IS clearly the statistic most people are referring to when they say that. So if you will describe from where or how you arrived at your stated statistic of 50% divorce rate, I'll be happy to post mine. A useful divorce rate stat will tell a given man what his chances are today. You have to consider race, age, generation, etc. There is no one number that will satisfy all people.
salaciousBastard 10 months ago
@salaciousBastard Notice he never responded to you on how he arrived at that divorce rate so you needn't apologize. It is obvious that you're not going to get an answer because he went on Wikipedia or some other area and is just repeating misinformation. Your calculations are more than likely correct.
rainbowbrainhead 8 months ago
@rainbowbrainhead you think they are correct because you are cherrypicking what you want to be correct.
He's provided no sources to back any of his calcuations so his numbers aren't anymore reliable then Paul's even if the divorece rate isn't 50% you are failing to account for all those marriages were people are unhappily married. Keep in mind a marriage doesn't have to end in divorce to be a failure and did it occur to you that divorce rates are down because marriage rates are down?
Zain844 8 months ago
@Zain844 No I'm not cherry picking. What I want instead of people hiding behind a bunch of miscalculations and stats, is the find the real truth and humanity behind it all because you don't get that from a channel that is nothing more than propaganda from someone who's a misogynist. If the vid is already slanted and biast, where are you getting? Yeah, I'm already aware that divorce rates are down because marriage rates are down. Is the Happy Misogynist aware of it?
rainbowbrainhead 8 months ago
@rainbowbrainhead hiding behind miscalcualtions and stats right.... but when people you agree with do it it's okay then? Despite his handle on YT , Paul Elam is actually not a real misogynist if you go to his website or listen to his radio show. but even if he was it has no bearing on the validity of his points. Simply calling him a misogynist does'nt mean you've refuted him.
Zain844 8 months ago
@Zain844 I called him what he is and yes I've seen his vids, and read the 'reason' he states he calls himself that, etc. etc. I never said he didn't have any points, however, let's call an apple an apple shall we? He still IS a misogynist & no that doesn't mean some of his stats may be off. I'm sure Hitler thought he had a point too but that doesn't mean I have to agree with what he did either. My point was & still IS, someone asked him to list how he came up with something & and he did not.
rainbowbrainhead 8 months ago
@rainbowbrainhead and again whether or not he is a misogynist is completely irrelevant to the validity of his points. Therefore other then to attack his character, there is no other reason to bring it up. Christian apologists and would try to discredit Charles Darwin by calling him a sexist, and a racist. even if it was true how does that disprove his points? Paul's stats may have been overexaggerated, but not by much. Divorce rates are still in the 45-50% range in most areas.
Zain844 8 months ago
@Zain844 so let's put it is another way -Paul is saying that feminists, which are MOSTLY female, have a lot of bad character traits that make them supposedly inferior partners. Why is it o.k. to be so dismissive about Charles Darwin's bad character traits (your example) but others don't get let off the hook that easily? and you thought I was the cherry picker.
rainbowbrainhead 8 months ago
@rainbowbrainhead Who doesn't get let off the hook so easily feminists? I'm afraid I don't understand the question.
Zain844 8 months ago
@rainbowbrainhead and lastly, if you are offended by his vids, Why do you watch them?
Zain844 8 months ago
@Zain844 Because I was interested in what he had to say. I've already said that just because someone is right on some of their stats doesn't mean they aren't what they are. In this guy's case HE IS A MISOGYNIST.It's funny to me how character supposedly is totally dismissed by some people: for example politicians may be very smart and have some valid points on things but some of them can't keep it in their pants. If a female was a politician she would immediately be discredited as a slut.
rainbowbrainhead 8 months ago
@rainbowbrainhead Females don't want to be politicians it has nothing to do with them being discredited or treated unfairly. For every woman who wants to be a politician there are 10 men who also want to be politicians. Women just don't want to do it. . again even if he really is a misogynist what is your point? That is not adding anything to the discussion. His character has nothing to do with the validity of his arguments why is that so hard to understand?
Zain844 8 months ago
@rainbowbrainhead it's not that you disagree with him it's that you are getting emotional and if his vids upset you that much then perhaps you should not watch them. Disagreenments are fine but you seen to have a personal problem with Paul Elam.
Zain844 8 months ago
@Zain844 I'm not emotional. Just one more so called 'character flaw' that some men attempt to shame women with: you're emotional. I disagree with him and that's that. I'm no more emotional over these videos than you are. I dont have a personal problem with Paul Elam. I'm stating my opinion which is he's a misogynist and clearly he is. Perhaps if you cannot tolerate criticism, you shouldn't attempt any discussions on this forum.
rainbowbrainhead 8 months ago
@rainbowbrainhead First of all, I never said anything about you having character flaws you did. Secondly I wasnt trying to shame you and third of all I had no idea you were a man or a woman. You are getting awfully defensive aren't you? It's not that you are critisizing Paul Elam that I have a problem with. It's that you are not offering anything else to this discussion. If you disagree with him please explain why. Instead of just repeating over and over again that he is a misogynist.
Zain844 8 months ago
@Zain844 Please, it is obvious I'm a female. First you accuse me of being emotional and now you accuse me of being defensive which I find ironic because you've been defensive in this whole exchange saying I'm judging someone and if I'm so upset why am I watching these vids and I have personal problems with Paul Elam so why are YOU being so defensive? Why do you keep repeating yourself? I was offering to the discussion until you went off topic and personalizing everything.
rainbowbrainhead 8 months ago
@rainbowbrainhead How is it obvious? it's not stated anywhere in your profile. I am not being defensive Paul Elam doesn't need anyone to defend him. Secondly I am simply being logical you keep saying he is a misogynist like that's the only thing you can say to refute the points he makes in his vids. i am trying (and failing apparently) to explain to you that whethher or not he is a misogynist is irrelevant. Please tell me why he is wrong. you seen incapable of being able to do that
Zain844 8 months ago
@Zain844
I'm a misogynist. I'm proud of it. The irony is that there is a class of women out there who find that very attractive. --a man who won't kiss your ass and suck up to all your bullshit is apparently a real catch.
Misogynist is just another word women use to shame men into be disposable commodities for their benefit. The moment you hold yourself above that is the moment they are forced to respect you.
gamenode 8 months ago
@gamenode Are you sure you're a misogynist and not just a chauvanist? Aren't misogynists by definiton men who hate women? and if it's just a word that women use to shame men then why use it? why call yourself a misogynist??
Zain844 8 months ago
@Zain844
Because by owning the word they can't use it as a weapon to shame me or other men. Women have slut walks because they want the term to be empowering. So I'm a misogynist and because I use the word as empowering other men won't be afraid to go against feminist hatred of men.
I am not a chauvinist--quite the opposite. I believe women have used reproductive tyranny to control and exploit men. As a result women's feelings are more important than men's lives. This is not equality.
gamenode 8 months ago
@gamenode by sluts owning the word it just boils down to "im a slut respect me" i just dont buy it. aside from that i agree with pretty much everything you say.
Zain844 8 months ago
@Zain844
But there is more than that Zain. I reject the notion that I "have" to like women or respect women or even help women in any way. Women should be expected to earn respect and affection and the sympathy of others rather than feeling entitled to it because they have a vagina. If a man must earn status to be afforded basic respect and human dignity then so should women. No more pussy passes. If men can be losers then so can women. If that makes me a misogynist then so be it.
gamenode 8 months ago
@gamenode but does that really make you a misogynist? I agree with everything you say actually, all a woman has to do to get respect is just bat her eyelashes where as men have to actaully EARN IT by getting a good job getting status getting his "shit together" howevever you want to put it. i to reject the notion that men are just disposable and utilitarian especially now that women have pretty much the same opportunuties that men do. No man has any obligation to care of a woman.
Zain844 8 months ago
@Zain844 but don't worry, seeing as how YOU have nothing more to offer except personal criticism, this dicussion is over. Happy dear?
rainbowbrainhead 8 months ago
@rainbowbrainhead It sounds to me like you are admitting defeat.
and I wasn't crtisizing you personally I was critisizing your argument (or lack there of)
Apparently you are having difficulty telling the difference between the two.
Zain844 8 months ago
@rainbowbrainhead
And let me ask you this Rainbowhead--why should men like women? What do you do for us? How have you helped men in this world? Do you stop when we our cars break down on the side of the road? Do you die for us in combat? Do you rush in to burning buildings for us? Or do you promote a legals systems which denies us equal parental and reproductive rights? Do you sit quietly and do nothing when this happens?
Misogynist is a person who recognizes that women harm/abuse men.
gamenode 8 months ago
@rainbowbrainhead
Actually it's usually the female politician's husband who gets the scrutiny.
At any rate, it is YOUR opinion that Paul is a misogynist. Having stated your opinion you should focus on the facts of the discussion. All you are doing is using ad hominem to discredit him rather than attacking his argument. This is what women have been doing for centuries. Using their words to devalue men so they could get men to do what they wanted.
gamenode 8 months ago
@Zain844 Also, I find it ironic that you would question why I'm even here. If the dude only wants to 'preach to the choir' then why do a fucking video? I don't understand why people ask a question like that. Don't other people like to hear about different points of views or is it just me? We should only watch videos we agree on. If that's the case, we shouldn't have any thumbs down options on the videos.
rainbowbrainhead 8 months ago
@rainbowbrainhead
If you are an MRA then you willingly accept a variety of opinions and debate because there is no "one" voice here. But if you come at us with outright denial and promoting a feminist pedagogy then you will rightly be called out for it. We've all lost patience with women who compete against us in every facet of life and then act victimized when we have the gall to compete right back. Feminists want men as slaves. This is there "equality".
gamenode 8 months ago
@rainbowbrainhead (continued) It is just another common shaming tactic. and Paul is actually aware that marriage rates are down. He even talks about it in another video about how trust between males and females is at an all time low and how less and less people are getting married most likely because they KNOW it's a bad idea. If they got married they would get divorced and the divorce rates would go up again. The logic is not that hard to follow. People are already avoiding the institution
Zain844 8 months ago
@rainbowbrainhead and since divorce rates often vary from place to place its hard to pin down what the exact divorce rate percentage is however many statistics and census groups have "ballparked" it around 40 to 50 percent. it may be lower in some other areas but in most areas it's ATLEAST around 40-46 percent. So Paul is off by a few percent. Sue him.
Zain844 8 months ago
@rainbowbrainhead
I am a very busy man. I do this channel, a busy website, and a radio show. So if I don't answer anyone it is likely I got sidetracked. Go to divorce rate dot org and you will see this:
The divorce rate in America for first marriage, vs second or third marriage
50% percent of first marriages, 67% of second and 74% of third marriages end in divorce, according to Jennifer Baker of the Forest Institute of Professional Psychology in Springfield, Missouri.
TheHappyMisogynist 8 months ago
@rainbowbrainhead
And they also provide a slightly different assessment:
According to enrichment journal on the divorce rate in America:
The divorce rate in America for first marriage is 41%
The divorce rate in America for second marriage is 60%
The divorce rate in America for third marriage is 73%
I will accept the apology from YOU.
TheHappyMisogynist 8 months ago
@TheHappyMisogynist That information can easily be found on Wikipedia and Yahoo answers but that doesn't mean it's as reliable as some may think it is...I've alreadys seen that information actually and didn't need you to clarify it for me. My post was in reference that someone two months ago asked you how you arrived at your calcuations and you didn't bother to reply so YOU should apologize to HIM and I need not apologize to you because I've done nothing wrong. Have a wonderful day.
rainbowbrainhead 8 months ago
@rainbowbrainhead
Just what I figured. You try to chide me for nor responding fast enough with sources, implying I don't have them, then when they are posted you dismiss them because they don't reflect your POV. Like I said, I am a busy man. Have a nice life.
TheHappyMisogynist 8 months ago
@TheHappyMisogynist lol someone you blocked now sent me a pm that was directed at you. I won't bother telling you what she said but its funny when you block people and they get so pissed off.
I blocked her as well.
Zain844 8 months ago
@TheHappyMisogynist
Paul people demand links because they don't want to believe you. Providing them won't change that and they likely won't be read anyway.
This is why men get so angry. If words worked we'd use them, but they so often fall on deaf ears that only gun and violence can be heard.
Throughout history no man got any rights from the powers that be without paying a blood price.
gamenode 8 months ago
@TheHappyMisogynist Can't seem to post the links. I assume there's so prohibition against posting outside links. As I said the CDC is more in agreement with your second statistics. Also, if you go to time.com and search for this article, "Are Marriage Statistics Divorced from Reality?," it should be somewhere near the top.
salaciousBastard 8 months ago
@salaciousBastard
Please take a look at my posts to rainman. Sorry, I meant rainbowbrainhead I gave you two sources. Yours please?
TheHappyMisogynist 8 months ago
@TheHappyMisogynist According the the CDC, your second statistics sound more reasonable. However, you're still taking about averages which is not telling any given man what HIS probable divorce rate is. Here is an article from Time which illustrates my point: Those married in the 70s are far more likely to divorce after 10 yrs than those married in the 90s. College grads are far less likely to be divorced after 20 yrs than less educated people.
salaciousBastard 8 months ago
@salaciousBastard
I read that Time article. It left me more confused than before. The simple fact is though that if you get married you are agreeing to be yoked into a system where you will be obligated in all things to her and she will have no obligations to you that she cannot disregard by fiat. All your obligations will be enforced by biased courts in the event of divorce and she will be liberated from doing anything for you. In essence you are agreeing to be her property.
gamenode 8 months ago
@TheHappyMisogynist The last thing I want to say that it was never my intention to discredit you. I only wanted a little more accuracy in your data. As I said earlier I agree with much of what you say. As a black man, even a college educated one, the odds of my having a successful marriage are far more dismal than yours, due to not only race but also my generation, etc. Please, don't assume because someone like Rainbowbrainhead "seems" to be cosigning my words that I agree with that person.
salaciousBastard 8 months ago
@salaciousBastard i hope your girl talkin like that, cuz if u are i have no comments 4 u but if your dude talkin like that stfu u sound like a str8 up bitch, fuck marriage nigga
illuminous09 8 months ago
@salaciousBastard . divorce rates are down because marriage rates are down. You can't get divorced if you were never married to begin with.
Zain844 8 months ago