Somehow I think think that if cho stole or bought his guns from a illegal source we'd still be hearing the same thing from anti-gunners. Even when he used pistols they fought against "assault weapons". Them and Citizens for a Safer Minnesota" are just opportunist who exploit tragedy for their own agenda.
They problem is not guns but rather "Gun free zones". They are nothing but a guarantee to a killer that they will encounter no armed resistance until the police show up. No matter how well trained, equipped, or dedicated the police are, they are still a reactive force and cannot be everywhere at once. Allowing law-abiding citizens to carry a gun serves as both a deterrent to criminal intentions and a much quicker response to incidents like what happened at VT at year ago.
Somehow I think think that if cho stole or bought his guns from a illegal source we'd still be hearing the same thing from anti-gunners. Even when he used pistols they fought against "assault weapons". Them and Citizens for a Safer Minnesota" are just opportunist who exploit tragedy for their own agenda.
rightsman123 3 years ago
Here is a question for anti-gunners:
Since when does disarmament equal protection?
Thats what I thought. Our society of law abiding citizens have the right to self defense.
zcm007attack 3 years ago 2
They problem is not guns but rather "Gun free zones". They are nothing but a guarantee to a killer that they will encounter no armed resistance until the police show up. No matter how well trained, equipped, or dedicated the police are, they are still a reactive force and cannot be everywhere at once. Allowing law-abiding citizens to carry a gun serves as both a deterrent to criminal intentions and a much quicker response to incidents like what happened at VT at year ago.
vaguy78 3 years ago 4
sad thing that happened,, but guns are part of our history and serve a great defense purpose..
more guns int he us than people..
get use to it- it will not change ever
immumezombie 3 years ago 2