Según este modelo estaría mal, pues la rueda dentada que está conectada a la Eólica de 3 aspas debería ser más grande que la que va al eje del generador, de manera tal que con un solo giro de la Eólica se produzcan 10 a 100 veces más giro en el generador. Y para la Eólica Vertical, donde la rueda dentada es pequeña sobre la rueda dentada del generador también está mal, pues la rueda dentada grande debe estar acoplada al eje de la Eólica y la pequeña al generador, solo así se multiplica el giro.
You have to be kidding, the amount of efficiency loss just through the gearing would make this completely unfeasible. Try again please. And seriously, you think Jesus really existed?
Why you say the gearing would cause much inefficiency ? The mechanism looks like a differential system in a car and nobody complains about a great lost of efficiency in the differential.
it actually makes sense to a certain degree if they have a electric clutch or an infinitely variable drive connecting them. I have used a smaller hawt many times to run power to my bigger unit till it gets up to speed and then it disconnects. In low wind speed conditions the unit will make some power if it can start but it needs to get going so the small unit is like a starter in your car. I would use a lift type vawt like the "Remkick" to get as much power from the wind as possible though
U use a simple differential gear to add both rotation movements, i think the windmill wich generates more force will slow down the rotation of the other, wich is fatal for the savonius roter cause he has low torque and generates low power at slow rotation speeds. U will have to make sure that both windmills have excactly the same torque, in every wind situation, wich i think is impossible.
@kreuzundquer i will try and correct you, and see if u agree-my suggestion-
i thought the same thing when i looked at the design, however when u wanna know the easiest way it could be just as simple to put a slip coupling/rpm rotation start piece so if either became suddenly irrelevant due to wind speed etc. it would simply dis-engage the proper blade
You are right in one sense; Good engineering uses the least number of moving parts possible for lower friction / increased efficiency.
However, to convert rotary motion at right angles, planetary gears such as these deliver vastly improved rigidity and load-bearing, with only minimal increase in friction. The benefits of double or even triple gearing in high torque applications far outweighs a slight reduction in efficiency.
Sorry , I mean how does the hawt part yaw? This is supposed to be a vawt geared onto a hawt to make the best of both but I reckon it would be more efficient to have either one or the other , my thoughts are that when the the hawt stalls it will make the vawt less efficient, etc.
This has been flagged as spam show
WORLD RECORD: BIGGEST WIND TURBINE
Visit: windturbinecarriedbywheels.weebly.com
ZERO-NOISE from gears and generators since they are sealed underground.
SAVES THE BIRDS AND BATS since slow-moving.
DOES NOT NEED TO OCCUPY A WIDER LANDSCAPE since the turbine can be very tall.
MAY BE LOWER-COST since it may use timber and other cheaper things.
ELUDES HURRICANE FORCE since the blades automatically close.
NO FIRE since well-cooled.
HELPS THE WIND ENERGY COMPANIES since it is FREE FOR ALL.
TheServiceWeb 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WORLD RECORD: BIGGEST WIND TURBINE
Visit: windturbinecarriedbywheels.weebly.com
ZERO-NOISE from gears and generators since they're sealed underground.
SAVES THE BIRDS AND BATS since the turbines are slow-moving.
DOES NOT NEED TO OCCUPY A WIDER LANDSCAPE since the turbine can be very tall.
MAY BE LOWER-COST since it can use parts of junked trucks and others.
ELUDES HURRICANE FORCE since the blades automatically close.
HELPS THE WIND ENERGY COMPANIES since it is FREE FOR ALL.
TheServiceWeb 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WORLD RECORD: BIGGEST WIND TURBINE
Visit: windturbinecarriedbywheels.weebly.com
ZERO-NOISE from the gears and the generators because they are sealed underground (Only the outer parts of the turbines may be heard.).
SAVES THE BIRDS AND BATS because the turbines are slow-moving since the speed is in the transmission gears and in the generators.
DOES NOT NEED TO OCCUPY A WIDER LANDSCAPE because the turbine can be very tall.
HELPS THE WIND ENERGY COMPANIES because it is FREE FOR ALL.
TheServiceWeb 2 weeks ago
Según este modelo estaría mal, pues la rueda dentada que está conectada a la Eólica de 3 aspas debería ser más grande que la que va al eje del generador, de manera tal que con un solo giro de la Eólica se produzcan 10 a 100 veces más giro en el generador. Y para la Eólica Vertical, donde la rueda dentada es pequeña sobre la rueda dentada del generador también está mal, pues la rueda dentada grande debe estar acoplada al eje de la Eólica y la pequeña al generador, solo así se multiplica el giro.
josejoaquinloayza 4 months ago
You have to be kidding, the amount of efficiency loss just through the gearing would make this completely unfeasible. Try again please. And seriously, you think Jesus really existed?
eBookerbob 7 months ago
@eBookerbob
Why you say the gearing would cause much inefficiency ? The mechanism looks like a differential system in a car and nobody complains about a great lost of efficiency in the differential.
powerdriller10 1 month ago
well, the best part of this video is the music...lol
shogunfogun 9 months ago
what is that nice song name?
efivip93 9 months ago
this music gives me a boner
PleasureTV 11 months ago
Holy Overmodulation, Batman!
eddiequest4 1 year ago
That has already been invented it is called a differential
pickelweasel380 1 year ago
wtf is this music rofl? hahaha
NizTeam 1 year ago
@NizTeam i kinda like it !!
kruelkiller 1 year ago
I made a very large #VAWT out of cardboard that actually held up pretty well. I think I have a #VIDEO of it posted somewhere...
themanyone 1 year ago
it actually makes sense to a certain degree if they have a electric clutch or an infinitely variable drive connecting them. I have used a smaller hawt many times to run power to my bigger unit till it gets up to speed and then it disconnects. In low wind speed conditions the unit will make some power if it can start but it needs to get going so the small unit is like a starter in your car. I would use a lift type vawt like the "Remkick" to get as much power from the wind as possible though
itsandbits1 1 year ago
The more complex you make this the more drag you have. Drag is not efficient
walperstyle 1 year ago
Nice... ;)
Phadaybaaz9211 1 year ago
There is mining equipment in the Mohave desert that uses a Model A rear end in just exactly this fashion.
unclesara 1 year ago
I meant darrieus not savonius sorry...
kreuzundquer 2 years ago
Why combine a vawt with a hawt?
U use a simple differential gear to add both rotation movements, i think the windmill wich generates more force will slow down the rotation of the other, wich is fatal for the savonius roter cause he has low torque and generates low power at slow rotation speeds. U will have to make sure that both windmills have excactly the same torque, in every wind situation, wich i think is impossible.
Correct me if I'm wrong!
kreuzundquer 2 years ago
@kreuzundquer i will try and correct you, and see if u agree-my suggestion-
i thought the same thing when i looked at the design, however when u wanna know the easiest way it could be just as simple to put a slip coupling/rpm rotation start piece so if either became suddenly irrelevant due to wind speed etc. it would simply dis-engage the proper blade
xxx777aaa 1 year ago
@xxx777aaa
Sure that would solve this problem, but than you have 2 seperate types of windmill design in 1 machine.... wich makes little sence...
kreuzundquer 1 year ago
Keep it simple stupid.
DominickBlack 2 years ago
I am trying to find ideas for wind driven devises to put in my yard. Are there still pictures of the creations in the video.
foxwood1944 2 years ago
pretty nice
sakcheegii 2 years ago
I think that it has too many moving parts. It should have the minimal amount of moving parts to allow for low maintenance.
joelito101 2 years ago
You are right in one sense; Good engineering uses the least number of moving parts possible for lower friction / increased efficiency.
However, to convert rotary motion at right angles, planetary gears such as these deliver vastly improved rigidity and load-bearing, with only minimal increase in friction. The benefits of double or even triple gearing in high torque applications far outweighs a slight reduction in efficiency.
OldSchoolSkill 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That's truly amazing! I slashed my electric bill in half! look here: solar.xfollow.me (Copy to your browser's address bar)
gdolim8 2 years ago
Sorry , I mean how does the hawt part yaw? This is supposed to be a vawt geared onto a hawt to make the best of both but I reckon it would be more efficient to have either one or the other , my thoughts are that when the the hawt stalls it will make the vawt less efficient, etc.
danphobic 2 years ago
how does the vawt yaw (point into the wind) ?
danphobic 2 years ago
VAWTs don't have to; that's the whole point.
GFraggle 2 years ago