so i imagine most people watching this are pilots ..I was curious what you as pilots think about the airplanes spraying Geo engineered chem trails into are sky's? now whether u believe our not i know you have noticed the planes spraying white chem trails daily ,,there are alarming rates of aluminum and barium being found in our trees and water... again i ask what is your opinion and do any of you pilots have anymore info on were they r landing and taking well we have questions!!!!!!!!!!
Are you serious? Those white trails you see are called contrails. It's just water vapor. You generally only see them coming from aircraft at relatively high altitude, where atmospheric conditions are right for their formation. There is no conspiracy, just high flying jets and water vapor.
@FLfalconer Have you ever heard of cloud seeding. Contrails disappear after a few minutes,the trails i'm speaking of hover and form a overcast cloud threw out the day! They make x patterns over and over till the whole area is no longer blue.. Now this happens in Reno NV almost everyday i have been in Medford OR the past few months and the same occurs here.The ski resorts in Tahoe claim the help fund cloud seeding all of you pilots can claim this doesn't happen your either lying our blind
Of course I know what cloud seeding is, but apparently you don't. It's used to encourage precipitation, which is something ski areas are very interested in during the winter. More snow equals better skiing.
And who told you that contrails disappear after a few minutes? Contrails can persists for hours, and can indeed encourage cloud formation.
You seem to lack a basic understanding of the concept of water vapor condensation, go read a book and take off the tin foil hat.
What's fastest jet at say 200 FT above the ground and don't give me F-22 bullshit
F-16 pretty good but fastets I 've seen so far on Video is F-14 and possibly Tornado from UK...I want to know the fastest ever recorded speed at 200 ft ???
You'll have to excuse my ignorance on this subject lads but i was wondering if, in the jet class, were the L-29s and L-39s being used still equipped with ejection systems aboard. I ask because in the UK any private civilian flying a former military aircraft is obligated to remove the system all together. However because of the nature of the flying at Reno i'm guessing that they retain the system, am i right or wrong in that ?.
I dont know what the rules are in the Reno races, but I know that here in the US you can keep your ejection seat functional, but it has to follow very strict FAA guidelines.
So the option is available to the pilots. I'm guessing that given the choice between flying a jet at 500mph at 50 ft with without an ejector seat and flying a jet at 500 mph at 50ft with an ejector seat these blokes would go with the ejector seat, unless they're nuts.
I just remembered watching a report some time ago about a private owner of a former RAF Jet Provost who, during the interview, stated that the ejection systems had to be removed once military jets were passed in to civilian hands. That's what i was going on really. Never really made alot of sense from a safety point of view i suppose and if your telling me that's not the case then i stand corrected, and relieved for those civilian pilots of former military jets in the UK.
Yes there was but his plane was too fast compared to the F-80's and The L-39's so the rules were changed to even out the playing field. There should be another jet class for swept wing, afterburning jets.
@Nighthawkwill7 Show up with a Tomcat with the wings stuck forward and say "no really, the AB is broken and I don't know anything about any swept wings!"
When I was in VF-302's fire conrtrol shop at miramar we once had to ferry an F4S to the east coast with no radar (awg-10b) so used the dummy weight, about 1100 lbs IIRC and we wondered why we couldn't pull gear instead off the tail like the record holding Phantom did. Apparantly the ATs like the radios and IFF to work. Pshaw
The music ruins it, and also gives YouTube an excuse to add annoying ads
bobmac84 4 months ago
i like the song but why for this video. id rather hear the planes
USAF2409 4 months ago
so i imagine most people watching this are pilots ..I was curious what you as pilots think about the airplanes spraying Geo engineered chem trails into are sky's? now whether u believe our not i know you have noticed the planes spraying white chem trails daily ,,there are alarming rates of aluminum and barium being found in our trees and water... again i ask what is your opinion and do any of you pilots have anymore info on were they r landing and taking well we have questions!!!!!!!!!!
illuminated775 1 year ago
@illuminated775
Are you serious? Those white trails you see are called contrails. It's just water vapor. You generally only see them coming from aircraft at relatively high altitude, where atmospheric conditions are right for their formation. There is no conspiracy, just high flying jets and water vapor.
FLfalconer 10 months ago
@FLfalconer Have you ever heard of cloud seeding. Contrails disappear after a few minutes,the trails i'm speaking of hover and form a overcast cloud threw out the day! They make x patterns over and over till the whole area is no longer blue.. Now this happens in Reno NV almost everyday i have been in Medford OR the past few months and the same occurs here.The ski resorts in Tahoe claim the help fund cloud seeding all of you pilots can claim this doesn't happen your either lying our blind
illuminated775 10 months ago
@illuminated775
Of course I know what cloud seeding is, but apparently you don't. It's used to encourage precipitation, which is something ski areas are very interested in during the winter. More snow equals better skiing.
And who told you that contrails disappear after a few minutes? Contrails can persists for hours, and can indeed encourage cloud formation.
You seem to lack a basic understanding of the concept of water vapor condensation, go read a book and take off the tin foil hat.
FLfalconer 10 months ago
Guys, the band was playing as the jets were staging, taxiing, and flying. Didn't you see them? lol Crappy music....
pathyskeeter 1 year ago
The Fratellis - Chelsea Dagger
theobald0 1 year ago
What's fastest jet at say 200 FT above the ground and don't give me F-22 bullshit
F-16 pretty good but fastets I 've seen so far on Video is F-14 and possibly Tornado from UK...I want to know the fastest ever recorded speed at 200 ft ???
CBAsystems 1 year ago
@CBAsystems tornado is fastest ever at low levels i heard ?
djwilko7 1 year ago
@djwilko7 yup i think you are right !
deltaalpha21074 1 year ago
engine noise only please
jango1968 1 year ago
Spoilt with the shitty music.Lets hear the jet engines please.
Rodarooni 1 year ago
Geeze, what crappy music.
SpeedyNeutrino43 1 year ago
STOP THE FUCKING MUSIC!!!!
UPUPUP69 1 year ago
shitty music over great noises of jets, one fucking star.
Polybun 2 years ago
Would be a nice video without the song...airplane videos don't need music...... THEY MAKE THEIR OWN!!!!!!
testpilot51 2 years ago 15
what song is tht?
justfuzzyz 2 years ago
You'll have to excuse my ignorance on this subject lads but i was wondering if, in the jet class, were the L-29s and L-39s being used still equipped with ejection systems aboard. I ask because in the UK any private civilian flying a former military aircraft is obligated to remove the system all together. However because of the nature of the flying at Reno i'm guessing that they retain the system, am i right or wrong in that ?.
britopinion 2 years ago
I dont know what the rules are in the Reno races, but I know that here in the US you can keep your ejection seat functional, but it has to follow very strict FAA guidelines.
WackoWasko 2 years ago
So the option is available to the pilots. I'm guessing that given the choice between flying a jet at 500mph at 50 ft with without an ejector seat and flying a jet at 500 mph at 50ft with an ejector seat these blokes would go with the ejector seat, unless they're nuts.
Thanks for the reply Wacko.
britopinion 2 years ago
Britopinion, i'm not sure where you got your info from, but most of the ex mil jets in the UK have "live ejection seats.
gpw678 2 years ago
I just remembered watching a report some time ago about a private owner of a former RAF Jet Provost who, during the interview, stated that the ejection systems had to be removed once military jets were passed in to civilian hands. That's what i was going on really. Never really made alot of sense from a safety point of view i suppose and if your telling me that's not the case then i stand corrected, and relieved for those civilian pilots of former military jets in the UK.
britopinion 2 years ago
Is the Jet class also unlimited? If someone showed up with say, a T-38, could they race it too?
brettt777 2 years ago
Jet Class is open to any non-afterburning jet with less than 15° of wing sweep. No T-38 allowed by those rules =/
Nighthawkwill7 2 years ago
Isn't there some guy with a Mig that has AB's that races there?
brettt777 2 years ago
Yes there was but his plane was too fast compared to the F-80's and The L-39's so the rules were changed to even out the playing field. There should be another jet class for swept wing, afterburning jets.
Nighthawkwill7 2 years ago
@Nighthawkwill7 Show up with a Tomcat with the wings stuck forward and say "no really, the AB is broken and I don't know anything about any swept wings!"
When I was in VF-302's fire conrtrol shop at miramar we once had to ferry an F4S to the east coast with no radar (awg-10b) so used the dummy weight, about 1100 lbs IIRC and we wondered why we couldn't pull gear instead off the tail like the record holding Phantom did. Apparantly the ATs like the radios and IFF to work. Pshaw
batvette 1 year ago
coooool!
LivetoDance431 3 years ago