But right off the bat the claim that nobody heard the planes approaching is a little disingenuous. We all heard the first plane flying over the firemen who were fliming a documentary. Its fine to ask question but dont deliberately avoid possible answers.
I can here because of this quote "Nico Haupt and former chief economist within the Labor Department under the Bush administration, Morgan Reynolds, argue that no planes were used in the attacks. Reynolds claims it is physically impossible that the Boeing planes of Flights 11 and 175, being largely aluminium, could have penetrated the steel frames of the Towers, and that digital compositing was used to depict the plane crashes in both news reports and subsequent amateur video "
And to answer the question posed around the 5:07 mark. The people on the ground couldnt see planes because their view is obviously obscured by the other buildings.. And footage on the news is from helicopters. Dude you really are fucking stupid.
a 6 ton jet engine that has the force to rip through the steel structured tower exit the other side get hurled with huge force and drop 700ft and cause zero damage to the street below and end up where it did without knocking down any of the surrounding scaffolding....
...or the guy who survived a head on collision with the plane by hiding behind his office desk...
and the shills have the nerve to call truthers insane...
"no planes were harmed during the making of this film"
I love the fact that all the witness audio testaments at the beginning were clearly from immediately after the plane impacts, when there would obviously be confusion and uncertainty as to what really happened. Based on the noises people would have heard and the speed things happened of course not everyone is going to know it was a Jet plane and at the time who in there right mind would think that unless they had a clear view of it.
At 3:18 Why does that plane have something underneath it? A twin engine? Carrying a missile? In various footage there was a flash a ball of fire before the collision.
at 8:40 what are the two different views there... you could at least explain that more.... ??? everything is just a picture/video with a question mark by it... and all these arrows??? this is just messy and doesn't actually say anything
Ghost planes my ass. Hell this is a ghost video, it's not even here, just looks like it. So there was no plane according to the freaky truthers, they claim it was a missle. Since when does a missle leave three holes? Maybe mind chips are for reall, something has got the truthers heads all fucked up. If truthers had used all their time wasted on their bullshit stories to research cancer instead we would probably have a cure by now
@stevengreen775 Actually weed is legal if you have cancer, and it's the good stuff, medical grade. But trust me having cancer isn't worth getting to smoke the herb.
@stevengreen775 I smoked a little when I was going through cancer treatments a few years ago. The treatments made me sick as a dog and the herb helped, some. Now what happened back in high school is in the past.. I mean it was the late 70's! Haven't touched the stuff since high school though, except for maybe 4 times during my treatments and it was perscribed to me.
this has never happened before to any other steel building in history! if i was designing or building these types of structures i'd wanna know why it happened to them! and what is up with the video of the alleged pentagon attack? supposedly there are 87 different cctv etc, shots of the attack? and the one released has to be the worst quality/detail of all! and doesnt prove anything.if i was american i'd be demanding a fresh inquiry into this! its a whitewash the whole thing is so full of holes.
I find it hard to beleive the theory of ghost planes completely, i understand that todays technology can produce these images.period but there was too many videos/pictures taken that day by proffesional and amateaur cameramen ok.to have faked each and everyone! however that said wether those planes were the stock commercial planes with passengers or not is a different argument.the main contention is that 3 partially damaged buildings collapsed in their entirity into their own footprint unnaded?
It´s frightening how many people are convinced that their own government would have let thousands of innocent civilians get killed just for the sake of invading middle east.
will convince you without a reasonable doubt that there was something fishy going on with this whole situation (at that is an understatement). The more videos you watch, the more you will understand the events of what may (but most likely) happened that day. Once again, I cannot say that my theory is what really happened, but I think the majority of people will agree that there is something just not right with the governments proposed story. The pros of fakery far outweighthecons.Hopethishelp
easier to present videos that can be undoubtedly accepted (which they were confident would convince the public of a realistic event and it obviously didn't) vs. actually getting "the culprits" onto the planes undetected, successfully hijack 4 planes with ease, and 2 of them head towards the towers where they entered the buildings with undocumented, unrealistic results proved by the laws of physics, and we are to believe that as the truth? I could continue to go on and on with evidence that wil
suggesting is that the planes are digitally inserted into the videos (all of these examples are from the evidence I've seen, documentaries, witnesses statements, physics and my personal opinions, again, I could be wrong about everything, but it is highly unlikely. We don't see the "real" videos of the planes crashing, if you will, almost every one of them will show a sign of editing and no alternative such as the "real" video, why?) Because they didn't actually film real planes. It's much
you that I feel may help you understand this tragedy in another light. Can you accept the fact that with today's technology, a building/an entire city could be recreated using digital effects? If you say no then you are wrong because it happens all the time in the movies. What is presented to us on TV is not what was seen by those in the city that day. When you start to think "outside the box", you will begin to notice the numerous anomalies found in most of the 911 videos. What I'm suggest
Like I said, I could be wrong, as could be millions of other Americans/foreigners. If there is someone out there that truly lost someone on one of the flights, I apologize for the way I perceived the information that was shown to me. But still consider the fact that the flights either did not take off, or they were flown to some other area and killed in some other fashion. I know it's hard to accept but it is a possibility and that cannot be denied. I have a few other examples to present to
events that took place that day (realistically, no one but the culprits really know all of the facts), but most of us have a great amount of common sense. Sure, the videos could have been fabricated to suggest foul play (by people that do things like that for their own satisfaction), but how does that help the culprits get their point across to the public to get them to accept their story without any reasonable doubt? It's because they unknowingly made several errors in the creation of thislie
"names" of the plane victims to justify the event that supposedly took place, but if it is apparent that the plane videos were faked/edited, why not accept the possibility that the names and flights were faked too? You could also assume that if the flights and people were real, then, like you said, they could have been silenced in another manner without the public ever having evidence of it. I know it sounds so far fetched but it's not impossible. I don't claim to be 100% positive about the
so what happened to all the people on the missing flights? the US government killed them? what about the plane that crashed into the pentagon and the other plane that went down that was planned to go into the white house? those were all faked too and the people that died in those planes were fake? sike.
@24DILL Well we are lead to believe, due to the evidence provided to us, that there were no planes (a fabricated cover up). Some would say that the flights and names of people were falsified (does not include the victims inside or around the buildings when they exploded/collapsed, I have friends that lost family/friends that day while at work in the buildings). People that insist they knew someone on one of the flights that crashed, could quite possibly be actors/liars. Yea they will read the
mmmm... this is the US government conspiracy... damnn.. why do they do this to their own innocent people. they pay tax. they should not blame other people do that. the US have an advance technology... but why they didnt detect the plane before it reach that area. where is their advancedd technology??? where are their traffic air controller? they should detected the plane first. rite??
Here is the THUTH behind 9/11 in simple words, so everybody can understand.
Who did this? Your US government!!!
The evidence is in your face. All 3 building were prepared to fall on 9/11. Regardless if they were hit or not, they were brought down by controlled demolition. And it was carefully and professionally planned way in advance of 9/11.
But right off the bat the claim that nobody heard the planes approaching is a little disingenuous. We all heard the first plane flying over the firemen who were fliming a documentary. Its fine to ask question but dont deliberately avoid possible answers.
hidepuller2008 4 months ago
I can here because of this quote "Nico Haupt and former chief economist within the Labor Department under the Bush administration, Morgan Reynolds, argue that no planes were used in the attacks. Reynolds claims it is physically impossible that the Boeing planes of Flights 11 and 175, being largely aluminium, could have penetrated the steel frames of the Towers, and that digital compositing was used to depict the plane crashes in both news reports and subsequent amateur video "
hidepuller2008 4 months ago
And to answer the question posed around the 5:07 mark. The people on the ground couldnt see planes because their view is obviously obscured by the other buildings.. And footage on the news is from helicopters. Dude you really are fucking stupid.
JandHfilms 4 months ago
@JandHfilms stupid ur stupid you say news helicopters meaning more than one lmao you get your facts str8 DICK
way2easy2love 4 months ago
You cant be serious.. This is the worst attempt at 'proof' I have ever seen. The planes are clearly visable in all your shown footage. Are you blind?
JandHfilms 4 months ago
a 6 ton jet engine that has the force to rip through the steel structured tower exit the other side get hurled with huge force and drop 700ft and cause zero damage to the street below and end up where it did without knocking down any of the surrounding scaffolding....
...or the guy who survived a head on collision with the plane by hiding behind his office desk...
and the shills have the nerve to call truthers insane...
"no planes were harmed during the making of this film"
cartoonplanes 5 months ago
top vid . a million thumbs up
stevengreen775 5 months ago
@TheObamaMorons How do your legs feel buddy?
JZJYRWO 5 months ago
this video is editing fraud!!!!!!
STEVE2718LUV 6 months ago
I love the fact that all the witness audio testaments at the beginning were clearly from immediately after the plane impacts, when there would obviously be confusion and uncertainty as to what really happened. Based on the noises people would have heard and the speed things happened of course not everyone is going to know it was a Jet plane and at the time who in there right mind would think that unless they had a clear view of it.
ollyg85 7 months ago 19
Of course they're real. And yes I've looked at them properly. *rollseyes*
AshtonArcher 7 months ago
Throughout history, each empire has sought genocide, it will never change.
JZJYRWO 7 months ago
At 3:18 Why does that plane have something underneath it? A twin engine? Carrying a missile? In various footage there was a flash a ball of fire before the collision.
abby495 10 months ago
at 8:40 what are the two different views there... you could at least explain that more.... ??? everything is just a picture/video with a question mark by it... and all these arrows??? this is just messy and doesn't actually say anything
svendiamond 10 months ago
this video is stupid as fuck
svendiamond 10 months ago
there is testimony of people on the street seeing planes fly into the buildings
edpgroup 11 months ago
Ghost planes my ass. Hell this is a ghost video, it's not even here, just looks like it. So there was no plane according to the freaky truthers, they claim it was a missle. Since when does a missle leave three holes? Maybe mind chips are for reall, something has got the truthers heads all fucked up. If truthers had used all their time wasted on their bullshit stories to research cancer instead we would probably have a cure by now
LAGunBroker 11 months ago
@LAGunBroker we do have a cure , it's free , it's simple but it's illegal . Cannabis .
stevengreen775 9 months ago
@stevengreen775 Actually weed is legal if you have cancer, and it's the good stuff, medical grade. But trust me having cancer isn't worth getting to smoke the herb.
LAGunBroker 9 months ago
@LAGunBroker i was n't on about smoking it
stevengreen775 9 months ago
@stevengreen775 I smoked a little when I was going through cancer treatments a few years ago. The treatments made me sick as a dog and the herb helped, some. Now what happened back in high school is in the past.. I mean it was the late 70's! Haven't touched the stuff since high school though, except for maybe 4 times during my treatments and it was perscribed to me.
LAGunBroker 9 months ago
this has never happened before to any other steel building in history! if i was designing or building these types of structures i'd wanna know why it happened to them! and what is up with the video of the alleged pentagon attack? supposedly there are 87 different cctv etc, shots of the attack? and the one released has to be the worst quality/detail of all! and doesnt prove anything.if i was american i'd be demanding a fresh inquiry into this! its a whitewash the whole thing is so full of holes.
1977Rainbo 11 months ago
I find it hard to beleive the theory of ghost planes completely, i understand that todays technology can produce these images.period but there was too many videos/pictures taken that day by proffesional and amateaur cameramen ok.to have faked each and everyone! however that said wether those planes were the stock commercial planes with passengers or not is a different argument.the main contention is that 3 partially damaged buildings collapsed in their entirity into their own footprint unnaded?
1977Rainbo 11 months ago
It´s frightening how many people are convinced that their own government would have let thousands of innocent civilians get killed just for the sake of invading middle east.
Exeron91 1 year ago
@Exeron91
watch
theory of ghostplane
LegPains 1 year ago
Read the downloadable e-book at Bollyn (dot) com.
ReDiscover911 (dot) com
Israel--which is largely controlled by so-called, self-styled Jews from Eastern Europe, did 9-11 along with Zionist neocon traitors in the US.
Read Bollyn's e-book. The connections are almost all there.
whole2th 1 year ago
will convince you without a reasonable doubt that there was something fishy going on with this whole situation (at that is an understatement). The more videos you watch, the more you will understand the events of what may (but most likely) happened that day. Once again, I cannot say that my theory is what really happened, but I think the majority of people will agree that there is something just not right with the governments proposed story. The pros of fakery far outweighthecons.Hopethishelp
BrutalMind1984 1 year ago
easier to present videos that can be undoubtedly accepted (which they were confident would convince the public of a realistic event and it obviously didn't) vs. actually getting "the culprits" onto the planes undetected, successfully hijack 4 planes with ease, and 2 of them head towards the towers where they entered the buildings with undocumented, unrealistic results proved by the laws of physics, and we are to believe that as the truth? I could continue to go on and on with evidence that wil
BrutalMind1984 1 year ago
suggesting is that the planes are digitally inserted into the videos (all of these examples are from the evidence I've seen, documentaries, witnesses statements, physics and my personal opinions, again, I could be wrong about everything, but it is highly unlikely. We don't see the "real" videos of the planes crashing, if you will, almost every one of them will show a sign of editing and no alternative such as the "real" video, why?) Because they didn't actually film real planes. It's much
BrutalMind1984 1 year ago
you that I feel may help you understand this tragedy in another light. Can you accept the fact that with today's technology, a building/an entire city could be recreated using digital effects? If you say no then you are wrong because it happens all the time in the movies. What is presented to us on TV is not what was seen by those in the city that day. When you start to think "outside the box", you will begin to notice the numerous anomalies found in most of the 911 videos. What I'm suggest
BrutalMind1984 1 year ago
Like I said, I could be wrong, as could be millions of other Americans/foreigners. If there is someone out there that truly lost someone on one of the flights, I apologize for the way I perceived the information that was shown to me. But still consider the fact that the flights either did not take off, or they were flown to some other area and killed in some other fashion. I know it's hard to accept but it is a possibility and that cannot be denied. I have a few other examples to present to
BrutalMind1984 1 year ago
events that took place that day (realistically, no one but the culprits really know all of the facts), but most of us have a great amount of common sense. Sure, the videos could have been fabricated to suggest foul play (by people that do things like that for their own satisfaction), but how does that help the culprits get their point across to the public to get them to accept their story without any reasonable doubt? It's because they unknowingly made several errors in the creation of thislie
BrutalMind1984 1 year ago
"names" of the plane victims to justify the event that supposedly took place, but if it is apparent that the plane videos were faked/edited, why not accept the possibility that the names and flights were faked too? You could also assume that if the flights and people were real, then, like you said, they could have been silenced in another manner without the public ever having evidence of it. I know it sounds so far fetched but it's not impossible. I don't claim to be 100% positive about the
BrutalMind1984 1 year ago
so what happened to all the people on the missing flights? the US government killed them? what about the plane that crashed into the pentagon and the other plane that went down that was planned to go into the white house? those were all faked too and the people that died in those planes were fake? sike.
24DILL 1 year ago
@24DILL
watch
THEORY OF GHOSTPLANE
LegPains 1 year ago
@24DILL Well we are lead to believe, due to the evidence provided to us, that there were no planes (a fabricated cover up). Some would say that the flights and names of people were falsified (does not include the victims inside or around the buildings when they exploded/collapsed, I have friends that lost family/friends that day while at work in the buildings). People that insist they knew someone on one of the flights that crashed, could quite possibly be actors/liars. Yea they will read the
BrutalMind1984 1 year ago
I think I got a photo of Karim Arraki plane.
danp5648 1 year ago
The hole in the north tower is a shap of a plane
Joefcool7 2 years ago
The hole in the north tower is a shap of a plane
Joefcool7 2 years ago
At 3:32 you can see the air plane approaching. It's between the twin towers and the empire state building.
agnostikus 2 years ago
its an object, pal, but no reallife plane!
sullvarian 2 years ago
@agnostikus ...yes i clearly saw it too..maybe the news guys were looking on the wrong side?
TheNeonAngel 1 year ago
mmmm... this is the US government conspiracy... damnn.. why do they do this to their own innocent people. they pay tax. they should not blame other people do that. the US have an advance technology... but why they didnt detect the plane before it reach that area. where is their advancedd technology??? where are their traffic air controller? they should detected the plane first. rite??
hazrinphixel 2 years ago
READ THIS!
Here is the THUTH behind 9/11 in simple words, so everybody can understand.
Who did this? Your US government!!!
The evidence is in your face. All 3 building were prepared to fall on 9/11. Regardless if they were hit or not, they were brought down by controlled demolition. And it was carefully and professionally planned way in advance of 9/11.
ComancheChiefSD 2 years ago 4
@ComancheChiefSD READ THIS! Shut the fuck up!
Joshalidina 1 year ago
Why did they do this?
1.Because they can full people into the war. Through the war they make money! Yes, LOTS OF MONEY!!!
2.And with Patriot Act and other laws they SLOWLY take away your FREEDOM!!!
ComancheChiefSD 2 years ago
diese doku bringt es am besten auf den punkt, schön dass du sie auch auf deinem kanal hast.
schnarch99 2 years ago 6