Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (76)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • when i see the emperor parading about in his new clothes i don't run to find the nearest so-called expert, my eyes aren't painted on, as the saying goes. if i happen upon a question i don't just bury my head till someone more qualified than myself sorts it out, i'll stick around until there's an answer, in other words, until the question is eliminated. instead, the questions here remain, who planted the thermite, who built the drone planes, who gave the order, who's pulling all the switches?

  • What I really object to here is the way this speaker reflexively distances himself from "conspiracy theory". What is wrong with these supposed intellectuals? It's anti-intellectual, to a real extreme, to dismiss attempts to understand that are sneeringly dismissed by other credentialed people as "conspiracy theory". Does the speaker acknowledge that the official theory itself is itself a conspiracy theory? It's impossible to look at an event and not consider how and why and by whom...

  • Only 'respectable' professional groups like Architect and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Pilots for 9/11 truth are capable of organising an event of such scale and garnering the international attention required to inform the American people of dissenting explanations for this blackest of days in US history. I think (most, not all of) the American media failed the American people, both then and now. Please, truth groups, push for an international commission and work back towards the US gov.

  • I'm certain I'm not the first person to suggest this, but I believe the only way to end this debate is a comprehensive and transparent investigation; I don't believe this can be achieved within the US. I call for a truly international inquiry, in a 'neutral' location, where all arguments are presented. Given both the range of nationalities killed on 9/11 and the enormous impact of American foreign (and domestic) policy at a global level for the last decade, surely this is justified?

  • what we really need is an accurate computer simulation with which we can explore how unlikely a collapse is

  • I salute the professionals. I'm a nobody, they understand. Thank you!

  • In the natural world the large upper block of the south tower would have fallen into the street a sold mass. You can see video on youtube of molten metal pouring out of the south tower just below the point the where it will separate moments later.

    The N Tower was hit so close to the roof that is is just absurd to postulate that gravity could account for so completely destroying the intact 90% below the impact point. without a doubt - wtc 1 2 & 7 were blown up with preplanted explosives.

  • Watch the Dimitri Khalezov documentary interview on my channel ... Dimitri provides the only explanation that fully explains ALL events of 9/11. The WTC was most definitely a controlled demolition.

  • Why is this interview chopped up so much? Is it because of the DVD coming out soon? I wanna learn more about this man because I have a very good debate with my best friend every few months. on the 9/11 topic. Him on the NIST side and I on the controlled demolition side. I hear just as much good evidence from both sides. It's hard to this video to become totally credible when it has SO much editing during his lecture. Can we see the whole thing from beginning to end with no cuts?

  • as soon as you see anyone mention 'no planes' re 9/11. You know they have no clue what they're talking about! Of course there were planes. we all saw them live in NYC..

    And Whether or not a plane hit the pentagon cannot be assessed atm bc of lack of evidence but the witness testimony suggests one did. It should be ignored for now bc it is not needed to prove conclusively that explosives were used to level wtc 1,2&7. No planes = disinformation = Bad for 9-11 Truth

  • No planes on 911 but plenty of witches and paid posters are in cyberland to repeat the story. At least McCoy says in the diagrams he say or in the pictures he saw. I assume he knows many witches. After all, he lives in California. For those of you who are to young to have seen the show. in 1987 Oprah had Mike Warnke on her show. Mike was a former witch who wrote "Satan Seller." John Todd is another former witch who tells of the witches in the music industry.

  • McCoy says he saw diagrams of 911. The man is an architect. He is not testifying that he knows there were planes. There were no planes on 911. He is testifying to the fact that fire does not bring down steel buildings. Of course, you paid posters who work for Witch Ann Cappelletti, GW Bush's witch aunt who was given the job to run the groups of paid posters & you post what you are paid by the Occultists in the U.S. govt to post what they want you to post PROPAGANDA, i.e. LIES.

  • Who of you don't know that Ann Cappelletti & Barbara Bush are illegitimate witch daughters of Aleister Crowley. Ann was a powerful black magick sorceror who has in her life killed many people and broken many people's legs, including breaking Barbaro's leg in the Preakness. Jacksons paid Ann $1million to break Barbaro's leg for him to end up being put down for them to collect $2 million insurance. Robertson was scared to death of witch Ann. As of 2007, witch Ann is powerless.

  • and blah blah blah blah.

    I would like to know what this guy has to say when a professional colleague, that being Les Robertson (who built the buildings) on their collapse said..(quote)..

    "There is no way one floor is going to hold 14 or more stories landing on it, not possible. It would collapse instantly.. and to the foundation" (end)

  • Comment removed

  • @074August There were no planes? Noooooooo!! really.?? Shit.

    Hey man go check out Kevin Goat gallery on PICASA. (Google it). Enough plane debris and body parts to convince Stevie Wonder. If you can't match up "COMMERCIAL JET MEETS BUILDING" from those i can't help you.

    No one can.

  • @roquefortfiles that doesnt begin to explain the long list of anomalies from 911. wtc 1 2 & 7 were brought down with explosives of that there is no doubt/

    The 100 day fires with temps up to 2800f, wtc7s implosion, how explosive wtc 1&2 were which pulverized all that concrete, and left no genetic trace found of 1100 victims, 1400 people blasted to small bits. NIST's ignoring of evidence of explosions and molten metal documented in the fema bpat appendix c, and the microshpheres etc

  • Perps used "Red" nano thermite (advanced military grade) plus explosives

  • y don't u do an investigation?

  • Who do you refer to as "they" and "the system"?

  • This is how the comments section works for all those denying the inside job:

    unless you got an education on this specialist subject, shut up.

    What we see is about 10 goverment engineers saying one thing, and common sense and 1404 (as of jan 3rd 2011) saying something else

    imagine your team scored 10 and another scored 1,404 and we just started!

  • @dxvxvx Nope. That's not how this section works on any subject. Read the disclaimer. In fact, you invoke exclusion of certain people. Not smart at all on a free comment section. I think you should be banned for life. Dumbass.

  • @stahlwerke they would have taken the towers down even if you were inside

    you think the system is your friend?

  • Honestly, the most compelling case for a new independent investigation is the fact NIST refused to test for explosives. That's it. Who are they protecting? Bush? Cheney? All the other crooks in high positions of government at the time? The banks? Insider traders? Corporate fraud, waste, and abuse? The US Army?

  • @HostileNegotiator no mossad, do you know how bad it would be if inplecaed, Aipac is full of US govt., officals, read the list!

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • You would think this guy could at least nail down the exact year of his career begining,,,I wonder if his drawings call out "about 1' something" and "datum about 102 feet" ...lol

  • Thank you for uploading these video's man!

    I hope that the American people will wake up, and come to know that the Muslims were innocent on 9/11!!

    Peace to all

  • @MohamedVsTheWorld

    "come to know that the Muslims were innocent on 9/11"

    Even if that is true, Muslims are still guilty of propagating a backward, hateful, vile worldview.

  • @MomoTheBellyDancer Oh yeah? And how do you know that? Because of the tube you watch each day?

    The tube that is being controlled by the Evil zionists/The devil worshippers(Illuminati people).

    Want to learn about Islam? Go to a Muslim that knows Islam and not to a christian or jew or atheist that knows nothing about that religion but preaches everything about it.

    Why can't I find hateful messages in the Quran? ( But the bible is full of it )

  • @babanapeal I watched (on TV) the towers come down 9 11 2001, having come in late and seeing the replay I asked someone what bought them down and when they said the planes,

    I said bullshit and to this very day I have said bullshit. Hot air rises and fuel cannot produce anywhere near enough heat to melt steel, full stop. I recon I would have known this by the age of 10 years. Hell is this world full of gullible idiots or not??

  • @babanapeal

    "fuel cannot produce anywhere near enough heat to melt steel"

    Nobody says the steel melted. The fires were hot enough to weaken the steel's structural integrity.

  • Comment removed

  • @babanapeal ",does the oven get hot? NO." Because it's insulated. "Where the fires still red after the first couple of minutes? NO." How do you know? Could you look inside the building? "black smoke? YES." Of course, with all the stuff burning. "black smoke in a steel mill? NO" Of course not, since nothing gets burned there. "flames leaping up the outsides of the buildings" Only in Hollywood movies.
  • @babanapeal

    "I am 100% sure the planes and or fires did not bring down the buildings"

    Based on what? Are you a materials expert?

    "I am sure you will change your mind as I have."

    I read all that conspiracy crap and it's just all laughable nonsense.

  • Comment removed

  • @babanapeal

    "have an IQ of 180"

    I'd expect better language capabilities of someone with such an IQ. High intelligence also doesn't prevent people from believing stupid things. In the year I was aMensa member I met quite a few people who have a rather retarded view of reality.

    In short: I'm not impressed.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @babanapeal  Yep, brainwashed tv watching zombies. My government could never lie to me!

  • We need a huge YOUTUBER to push this VID in their daily/weekly vids!!

    Great presentation. Convinces grownups very easily

  • @15:05

    "...let's take the time to do it right...and get the record right."

    Amen to that.

  • The planes entered the WTC Fully Intact. It takes awhile to see things as they are, everything is so outrageous. The plane's wing tips, edges, fuselage and tail Fully enter and 3 frames later it explodes! Some Boeing! And the nose comes out the other side!! 100 Pine st is High End. It's near Market st. I went there in 2000. Parking down there was $10 hr! $40+ a day. If you could find a parking space.

  • Jesus dudes! There must be some record of the people who did that demolition work. What about data bases? Records of daily activity? Did they work out of that building and did the record get destroyed?

  • It doesn't seem like anybody wants to know this but Dick the VP and Arnold the Gov began their careers at the 1970 bombing at the U of Wis. late August or thereabouts. 2 things made the national new from UWis that week Arnold getting a degree from Dick's Dept in Econ, and that same bldg. getting truck bombed with ferilizer and fuel oil. Maybe it was coincidence, but then the trial files were sealed for "national security" reasons.. How much peripheral evidence do we need?

  • i have to say that this is probably the most "convincing" presentation that i have ever seen in my entire life. (and that is getting to be a longish time). I think my rendition of hollow earth could be fairly convincing also, but it does not exist or need to exist within "status" considerations so therefore "unimportant to anything but how truth works". Basically it says; There is an inner world we mostly don't belong to, in the outer world. And it's a secret, but a universally old secret.

  • @hypnofan35 i think that there has to be some kind of unwritten or unspoken politial law; that would go something like this: The person or party that is holding a gun to your head cannot possibly ever be suspect. I expect that 911 was about 99.9999% Dick Cheney's baby from conception to now.  I don't really know why the news is so corrupted; other than their jobs are in danger or maybe even their lives. Every day we hear some crap about it being Muslims that did it. BS it was Dick Cheney!

  • @hypnofan35 So what is is that the death faction of the GOP has or holds? Let's guess that they have "the secret remote control shock collar of death". I call it the "GICCC" or ghostable interface crasher/controller chip. It can be a "built in on controller chips". Don't ask me, but i think that has to be DCs baby as well. He is either some kind of evil genius or good soldier for someone who is. Can it be found? yep, but you need the access code or means to call it up.

  • @hypnofan35 Since many of the people who read this might be science oriented, there is another major secret that is hidden behind a wall of officiality: The steam engine was about to evolve into a "high efficiency pulsing with residual heat recovery engine". You will get officials coming out of the woodwork saying this can't be so, You can capture heat and make a high efficiency engine with pneumatics as well. The point is to get away from internal combusition heat chucking technology.

  • @hypnofan35 The point with steam and pnematics engines is that the pusher media is separated from the combustion products and the fire's energy can be used far more efficiently if the pusher media and the fire can operate and work across an impermiable barrier. Hence there is not excessive heat, and very little needs to be discarded in the mechanical power out generation. Why do we never ever see steam or pneumatics? It's to support the fuel power monopoly.

  • it has also been proven using flight simulators that NO ONE could have flew a plane into the pentagon like that. all the simulations end in complete failure, and none has ever successfully hit the pentagon the exact way they say it was done... even when the simulator pilots were some of the best pilots out there.

  • Office furnishings caused it to collapse, buahahahaha....Good vid. and rational.

  • You guys are truly my heroes!! Hope in ever bleaker times. I now just tell people to go to your site.....It really has helped a lot more eyes open. Thank-you, thank-you ,thank-you!!!!

  • I believe it!

  • @sadol11 Thank You From the video record I just don't see a plane shreding...I see a supposed plane disappearing...I don't see a building collapsing...I see a building exploding...the end

  • @skibee50

    I can go to bed now :-) but also remember WTC7!

  • You should do some research on the airplanes and the maximum speed of boeing 767 at sea level. 500 mph excedes the top speed of the airplane at sea level. It would have broken apart due to the resistance of the dense air at such a low altitude long before impact. From the videos the plane appears to behave more like a bunkerbuster bomb decorated like a airplane rather than a airplane. I beg you to take another look at the explosion... there was no fireball on the outside...it exploded inside :)

  • It has been around 10 years now since this happened. If the truth has not come out by now, it never will.

  • @slhines7 The truth is out ...it's just that no one believes it :(

  • @skibee50 I think and hope that you are right about that one, as far as the mainstream goes.

  • @slhines7 In US. Out of US almost everybody thinks it was an inside job :). US citizens are heavily indoctrinated by the FOX , CNN and most of the mainstream media.

  • @tbyte

    watch?v=ktoTZuONpjE

    Geraldo Rivera Freedom Watch 11/19/10: 911 Conspiracy Theories

  • @SuperAtheist Aowow ... now even Fox is turning around ... 10 years later

  • @tbyte I agree with you for the most part, excluding the "everyone" part. I wish that everyone did indeed see and know the potential truth. That is why people like me are called birthers, truthers, tin foil hat wearers, etc. The ones in denial just love to group people like myself into these name calling groups.

  • @slhines7

    tell that to the JFK & the Pearl Harbor people.

  • Oh my! We all know it was an inside job. Anyone who has not gotten it right now is an idiot.

    Nice upload.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more