Lets see... buy a Mac and you get an OUT OF DATE Intel chip on an Intel board, running software that if you want speed and stability linux based is still faster and they want to charge how much for it?!? hahaha fuck Mac. I am a custom builder and yes i can compare my custom builds to a MAC and say i can buy a copy of your software and run it faster than your air flow inferior case.... and guess what it wouldn't cost me half of what the Mac would.....
Unless something drastic changes, Apple will always keep their OS tied to their hardware. The hardware is where they make their money and they use the OS to force people who want it to buy their hardware. The irony is, lots of people are now using Windows on Macs.
As much as I understand your point about the incongruence about both companies and their ads, the thing is: most users won't separate software from hardware. They will weigh the whole product experience as a whole. Therefore, I do understand why Apple and Microsoft are speaking to the same audiences in similar ways.
Now, what I think it was a mistake was for PC... err... I mean, Microsoft to talk balk to Apple. The leader NEVER answers to the underdog. MS just empowered Apple.
He pretty much was king of Mac vs Pc and made videos continuously for about a year defending Apple from the haters. He had a style that many did not understand and had lots of shock value. He got injured and disappeared for a long while and then came back with a even more shock type style that lead to more personal fights than content, accounts were created and flagged until today where he only will comment from time to time.
ah, yeah, some valid points, but you're missing the point of Microsoft's current campaign and giving far too much credit to the ad's intended audience and the "global financial crisis" times in which they're being run. sadly, you *can* boil down the decision-making process most consumers go through in selecting a computer in the way Microsoft depict, despite the initial cost & Total Cost of Ownership of Mac & Windows being very different.
very few ads as in get a mac are on hardware and they mostly focus on onboard cameras and the like, that is why i showed so many on the software. If I have to keep repeating it, I will. Clones were Apple licensing hardware, very expensive RISC hardware out AND it was not the reason for bankruptcy. Apple went through SO many CEOs because the failures started from day 1 of the release of Mac, Apple fell from num 1 to almost 0 long before the clones, protectionism killed Apple, not the clones.
"very few ads as in get a mac are on hardware and they mostly focus on onboard cameras and the like,"
When apple talks about OSX, they are doing it as a reason to buy a Mac.
"Apple went through SO many CEOs because the failures started from day 1 of the release of Mac"
John Skulley
Mike Spindler
Gil Amilio
and Steve Jobs.
Steve is by far the most successful CEO in Apple history. Also, as I recall, it was his idea to kill the clones. Apple is profitable. Should be enough, but noOOOo
re-read what i was saying from day 1 release of the mac, that is my point onward not pre mac as for the ceos. I know the reasons Apple sells OSX, the migration I see of which i will do a vid are the move to intel and the next step to extend os x beyond Apple hardware, hey it may never happen, but I know it would not kill Apple, it would make them stronger and I never expect an OSX domination over windows but a much larger % market share than today.
"I know it would not kill Apple, it would make them stronger and I never expect an OSX domination over windows but a much larger % market share than today."
Think of this as a game of chess between microsoft and Apple.
Microsoft has a lot more pieces but is missing a queen and maybe it's knights. Apple has it's queen, knights and pawns. It can win it, but only if it is very VERY careful about its moves. What you suggest is reckless.
The Clones accounted for barely any of the Mac OS sales. This had little to do with Apple's financial problems.
Saying that Apple hardware will not sell because OS X is on regular hardware is a poor argument. People will continue to purchase Apple hardware because of their positive past experiences with reliability and support.
Apple might loose a bit of hardware marketshare if OS X does get set free, but that cost will be recouped 10 fold in software.
You dont pay for the computer "Macs" you mostly pay for the brand.... And plus My Intel i7 Computer with 6gb ddr3, 500gb Hd, Asus Motherboard, Nvidia geforce 9600 Gs, for the same price as a imac.
well the software and the OS, it's basically for people who don't like windows anymore. If windows is fine for you, than there is no reason for you to get a mac.
I having nothing against the mac, but most of the mac's I use crash a lot on the software side. the os itself barely crashes but the applications inside of the os crash much more then windows on the computers I have used. I will see if it is better when snow leopard comes if it has fixed the issues I have had with leopard and tiger(my favorite). No os is perfect that is for sure. they both work well if they are in the right environments, and situations. I am getting a next gen macbook though.
The thing I wonder is didn't you use to be a windows fanboy. nothing wrong with that. I like to custom build so if its a desktop for sure I am choosing the PC(windows/linux,etc). the mac laptops seem better than most, the only thing I don't like is I heard that in bootcamp it runs hotter than when you are running mac osx. does it still take forever to import video files to imovie? just a question don't get mad, but when I use to use mac, it took 300 minutes to import an avi file to imovie.
I was never a windows fanboy, I was a PC fanboy and I still am. And I agree with you. And I haven't gotten my mac yet but my brother has a mac mini. And to tell you the truth, iMovie and Windows movie maker both equally suck. Sometimes OS X has trouble dealing with Windows proprietary formats (which avi is) I suggest converting to mp4, it is friendly on all platforms.
mac fanboy... its pretty simple. its like having to friends. one is a virgin that dresses real nice usually in black or white, and the other friend is a babe shagging chick magnet that is his own diverse person.
Apple makes both software and hardware. Microsoft only makes software. So, while Apple can launch attacks at other OEMs, they were smarter and attacked the competitor—Windows—and criticized it's faults. In Apple's case, the software is only there to sell the hardware. In other OEM's case, the hardware is there to sell the software. In other words, Apple doesn't care that much about the hardware and focuses on giving the best end-user experience and best OS.
First, I have to say, Ads are Ads, I don't let anyone telling me what to buy. 2nd, I LOVE building my own computer, and I do not have the option of installing OS10, I have to choose between Win, and Lin.
Buy a Mac, ok. I'm a PC, ok.
I'm a builder and I buy parts. Why? Something I've been doing since the mid 90's and until I get sick of it, I'll be a Linux and Windows user. OS10 is great, but lacks the most important thing to me. It lacks to let me, be me.
Never set mac os x free. This is how i see it, apple innovates on there hardware and software and it shows. I saw apple introducing isights on most of there computers as standards, soon after hp and dell did the same on some of there computers. I see apple with back lit keyboards and now is see dell and other doing the same. I see apple using ddr 3 ram on all of their mac, other computer companies are slowly doing this now. I see apple innovating and other following apple. Thats what I see.
This is directed toward Jack aka Dragonballjuijitsu if he's reading this. Would you unblock me from your channel? I know we had a disagreement on Laptops some months ago, however I still would like to comment on your channel even if we don't always see eye to eye on some issues.
I'm liking what I'm seeing in Windows 7 too. Waiting on the RC build supposed to be released in May, was going to be April.
Windows has focused on the software commercials too like 8 vs 80 and the 4 year old editing a photograph. So it wasn't always directed toward hardware like these two commercials. Anyway, get well Mrbit...
I agree 100% with this video. The way I see it, only good thing about running windows is the hardware. And the only good thing about mac is the software, and their advertising reflects that. When you ask a windows fanboy about what's so great about windows, 9/10 they will start talking about hardware, and price. Ask a mac fanboy what's so great about macs, they will say the things that are in the commercials.
I am a computer fanboy; Microsoft supports more companies than Apple and the hardware is by far better and cheaper for a pc, on the other hand OSX is very stable and secure but that isn't because it is better it is because it doesn't have the same support and openness as windows and has a smaller share of the market. If the roles were reversed the issues would be reversed. For a laptop go apple for a desktop go PC my views.
watch my old set os x free vids. Many project the problems of windows on other OSs. The problem is that the Operating Systems are different and Windows has legacy that has haunted it and has lead to many of its weaknesses. Apple will have issues just as they are creeping in with the switch to intel, but it will never be another windows and could never run on as much as windows does either.
That's not true. OS X is more stable and secure than Windows because it is UNIX based and Unix's main focus is stability and security. That is a myth, excuse my language but Windows is that way because it is a piece of shit.
windows 2000 was stable nt 4.0 was stable xp is stable; 98 SE was very stable; UNIX makes OSX a great system but if you believe that it would not suffer the same fate as windows if the tables were turned your lying to yourself.
Windows 2000 was stable yes, NT4.0 was stable yes. 98 SE don't know about that. BUT Windows XP was not stable. Win XP is bluescreen haven. Also to add it's about as secure as a KKK klansman walking through the projects in full gear. I am not lying to myself you see because OS X (btw I am a linux guy not mac to be clear) is based on BSD, which is the best kind of UNIX. And if it was on a lot of systems it would not face the same fate as windows. Linux runs fine on just about anything.
I love UNIX but XP is very stable; it may have had issues in the past but its been stable for quite some time. If MS would switch over it would be nice but highly unlikely.
Windows fate is its registry. it can run well but the registry bad design turns it into crap after prolonged installing, and uninstalling. If you leave windows with the same applications for a long time, it will be stable, not as stable as unix, but it will be stable. the record up times are on netcraft have windows pretty close to the top, but BSD, AIX beats it. windows runs well as a business machine because most of the time it usually has the same applications on it for prolonged periods.
Apple has been coasting on these snobby ads for a while now. I agree that the best solution is to set OSX free to run on any hardware, retail or home built. I would love to run OSX, I just can't afford a decent Mac, and I already have a decent PC. Let competition decide...I think Apple is still scared that they can't justify their ridiculous hardware prices in a down economy. What am I saying? Mactards will sell a kidney to afford this stuff. Scott Bourne, I'm talking to you!
Apple's ads actually tell you something in a back of mind kind of way. Microsoft's ads are just retarded that absolutely don't tell anything and are completely stupid humor filled with things like I have a beard and I where blue jeans. WTF? Apple actually compares and shares what it does, Microsoft just promotes that OEMs are cheaper with much less hardware installed.
Funny the part about I have a beard, and PC. If we look at stereotypes, then grow that beard long and become a UNIX hacker, or looking at it another way, if you use UNIX you are supposed to have a beard. Hacker is used here to mean someone who takes an interest in programming and computers at a deeper level, rather than a cracker.
Lets see... buy a Mac and you get an OUT OF DATE Intel chip on an Intel board, running software that if you want speed and stability linux based is still faster and they want to charge how much for it?!? hahaha fuck Mac. I am a custom builder and yes i can compare my custom builds to a MAC and say i can buy a copy of your software and run it faster than your air flow inferior case.... and guess what it wouldn't cost me half of what the Mac would.....
silentexodus666 1 year ago
lmao i have installed windows 7 and Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard on my PC ..
and how much did i paid for the mac os??? zero , nada, nul,صفر,零,sıfır,нуль etc...
why buy expensive Hard Ware if you can get it cheaper and better ?
chilapa90 2 years ago
osX should bet universally run.... maybe one day
minion6500 2 years ago
mrbit10 are you serious man?get a life and girlfriend man and masturbate your idick
nikoskikou1988 2 years ago
and your the one trolling on his video....
TheGreatStash1994 2 years ago
Unless something drastic changes, Apple will always keep their OS tied to their hardware. The hardware is where they make their money and they use the OS to force people who want it to buy their hardware. The irony is, lots of people are now using Windows on Macs.
gcrav 2 years ago
and since MS is purely a software company , they r laughing their socks off :P)
girlsdrinkfeck 2 years ago
My video response is not for mrbit10 but it does mention OS X and HP and Dell clones.
adobePC 2 years ago
As much as I understand your point about the incongruence about both companies and their ads, the thing is: most users won't separate software from hardware. They will weigh the whole product experience as a whole. Therefore, I do understand why Apple and Microsoft are speaking to the same audiences in similar ways.
Now, what I think it was a mistake was for PC... err... I mean, Microsoft to talk balk to Apple. The leader NEVER answers to the underdog. MS just empowered Apple.
jchaac 2 years ago
Told so many people about this awesome vid. MrBit you are AWESOME
iReactHD 2 years ago
thanks very much :)
mrbit10 2 years ago
Get a room!
Tomskok 2 years ago
No Problem man always here to help
iReact2HD 2 years ago
at the end you forgot to put: "Made on a Mac."
The120DaysofSodom 2 years ago
No, he forgot to put : Made by a faggot
Tomskok 2 years ago
woot woot windows pwns
jasethevase 2 years ago
kinda.
FedoraFTW 2 years ago
Bar-None, the best dominantly Text'd video I've seen. Kost would be so proud! You are the man!
droadtrip 2 years ago
ha, thanks very much
mrbit10 2 years ago
Don't mind me asking, but i keep hearing about this person named Kost on quite a few video's. Who is he?
beejm90 2 years ago
He pretty much was king of Mac vs Pc and made videos continuously for about a year defending Apple from the haters. He had a style that many did not understand and had lots of shock value. He got injured and disappeared for a long while and then came back with a even more shock type style that lead to more personal fights than content, accounts were created and flagged until today where he only will comment from time to time.
mrbit10 2 years ago
This by far the best quality youtube video...
ReyGilliano 2 years ago
thanks very much!!!
mrbit10 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¸„ø¤º°¨ post to 9 other vids
¨°º¤ø„¸ Copy „ø¤º°¨ press F5 twice
¸„ø¤º°¨Paste ``°º¤ø„¸
¸„ø¤º°¨¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º look at ur background
jvc779 2 years ago
Perfect. This is exactly what I try to tell people. Cool beginning by the way.
SourceZombie 2 years ago 4
me 2, its not always about the hardware and price
bigdima3 2 years ago
personally i started using a mac because it was different, now i've grown to like it, how ever i still like windows, even if it can be annoying
Skutz0r 2 years ago
ah, yeah, some valid points, but you're missing the point of Microsoft's current campaign and giving far too much credit to the ad's intended audience and the "global financial crisis" times in which they're being run. sadly, you *can* boil down the decision-making process most consumers go through in selecting a computer in the way Microsoft depict, despite the initial cost & Total Cost of Ownership of Mac & Windows being very different.
techydude 2 years ago
Mrbit, Windows isn't the only competitor. Apple has made SEVERAL ads touting their hardware vs PC hardware.
They are saying, 'We have good hardware AND software, buy from us.'
Saying 'open the OS up', just echo's words that nearly led to Apple going bankrupt in the 90's, we've been over this time and again.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
very few ads as in get a mac are on hardware and they mostly focus on onboard cameras and the like, that is why i showed so many on the software. If I have to keep repeating it, I will. Clones were Apple licensing hardware, very expensive RISC hardware out AND it was not the reason for bankruptcy. Apple went through SO many CEOs because the failures started from day 1 of the release of Mac, Apple fell from num 1 to almost 0 long before the clones, protectionism killed Apple, not the clones.
mrbit10 2 years ago
"very few ads as in get a mac are on hardware and they mostly focus on onboard cameras and the like,"
When apple talks about OSX, they are doing it as a reason to buy a Mac.
"Apple went through SO many CEOs because the failures started from day 1 of the release of Mac"
John Skulley
Mike Spindler
Gil Amilio
and Steve Jobs.
Steve is by far the most successful CEO in Apple history. Also, as I recall, it was his idea to kill the clones. Apple is profitable. Should be enough, but noOOOo
sc0pl355 2 years ago
re-read what i was saying from day 1 release of the mac, that is my point onward not pre mac as for the ceos. I know the reasons Apple sells OSX, the migration I see of which i will do a vid are the move to intel and the next step to extend os x beyond Apple hardware, hey it may never happen, but I know it would not kill Apple, it would make them stronger and I never expect an OSX domination over windows but a much larger % market share than today.
mrbit10 2 years ago
"I know it would not kill Apple, it would make them stronger and I never expect an OSX domination over windows but a much larger % market share than today."
Think of this as a game of chess between microsoft and Apple.
Microsoft has a lot more pieces but is missing a queen and maybe it's knights. Apple has it's queen, knights and pawns. It can win it, but only if it is very VERY careful about its moves. What you suggest is reckless.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
thanks very much for your comment, much appreciated.
mrbit10 2 years ago
The Clones accounted for barely any of the Mac OS sales. This had little to do with Apple's financial problems.
Saying that Apple hardware will not sell because OS X is on regular hardware is a poor argument. People will continue to purchase Apple hardware because of their positive past experiences with reliability and support.
Apple might loose a bit of hardware marketshare if OS X does get set free, but that cost will be recouped 10 fold in software.
niceverett 2 years ago
"The Clones accounted for barely any of the Mac OS sales."
Coulda fooled me. When the clones were around, I sure saw a LOT of them and manufacturers were making a lot of them to be barely selling.
As I recall, the clones canibalized Apple sales. That's why Steve Jobs killed the clones.
"Apple might loose a bit of hardware marketshare if OS X does get set free, but that cost will be recouped 10 fold in software."
No, it is a recipe for disaster.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
Mrbit i have to disagree,
You dont pay for the computer "Macs" you mostly pay for the brand.... And plus My Intel i7 Computer with 6gb ddr3, 500gb Hd, Asus Motherboard, Nvidia geforce 9600 Gs, for the same price as a imac.
I call that a computer,
Jullzzzz 2 years ago
what part do you disagree with? YOu simply stated hardware?
mrbit10 2 years ago
Macs are just expensive in Australia and trust me i dont get whats worth paying anyways.
Jullzzzz 2 years ago
well the software and the OS, it's basically for people who don't like windows anymore. If windows is fine for you, than there is no reason for you to get a mac.
oOTheAlchemistOo 2 years ago
I having nothing against the mac, but most of the mac's I use crash a lot on the software side. the os itself barely crashes but the applications inside of the os crash much more then windows on the computers I have used. I will see if it is better when snow leopard comes if it has fixed the issues I have had with leopard and tiger(my favorite). No os is perfect that is for sure. they both work well if they are in the right environments, and situations. I am getting a next gen macbook though.
ASCII808 2 years ago
True apps do crash in OS X.
oOTheAlchemistOo 2 years ago 2
The thing I wonder is didn't you use to be a windows fanboy. nothing wrong with that. I like to custom build so if its a desktop for sure I am choosing the PC(windows/linux,etc). the mac laptops seem better than most, the only thing I don't like is I heard that in bootcamp it runs hotter than when you are running mac osx. does it still take forever to import video files to imovie? just a question don't get mad, but when I use to use mac, it took 300 minutes to import an avi file to imovie.
ASCII808 2 years ago
I was never a windows fanboy, I was a PC fanboy and I still am. And I agree with you. And I haven't gotten my mac yet but my brother has a mac mini. And to tell you the truth, iMovie and Windows movie maker both equally suck. Sometimes OS X has trouble dealing with Windows proprietary formats (which avi is) I suggest converting to mp4, it is friendly on all platforms.
oOTheAlchemistOo 2 years ago
I see, sorry for the misunderstanding.
ASCII808 2 years ago
no problem man
oOTheAlchemistOo 2 years ago
I personally believe and agree with dragonballjiujitsu that setting OS X free is a bad idea. It's bad for Apple and OS X itself.
JGalva88 2 years ago
"I personally believe and agree with dragonballjiujitsu that setting OS X free is a bad idea. It's bad for Apple and OS X itself."
too true. but we've been over this before.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
mac fanboy... its pretty simple. its like having to friends. one is a virgin that dresses real nice usually in black or white, and the other friend is a babe shagging chick magnet that is his own diverse person.
TheDeathofGrace 2 years ago
The "I'm a PC" ads are really pathetic, I have to say.
apocalypseap 2 years ago
PRO!
Sier9iej 2 years ago
CORRECT
douguk47 2 years ago
Neat and tidy video mrbit10.
But seriously, go fuck yourself you filthy piece of shit.
myassiswet 2 years ago
as for Windows 7. I think the Vista Ad suits it best.
The WOW starts here.
The PC vs Mac ads to me doesn't make much sense. It's an OEM vs an OS. It's like comparing Apples's and apple core. (kinda sounds like a pun)
ThingsontheWeb 2 years ago
Apple makes both software and hardware. Microsoft only makes software. So, while Apple can launch attacks at other OEMs, they were smarter and attacked the competitor—Windows—and criticized it's faults. In Apple's case, the software is only there to sell the hardware. In other OEM's case, the hardware is there to sell the software. In other words, Apple doesn't care that much about the hardware and focuses on giving the best end-user experience and best OS.
Atheismrulez 2 years ago 2
I type LOL, Apple's OEM PC , comes stocked with Very Nice Apps. From Picture and video apps, to Boot Camp, and the stability of OS10.
Vs.
an OS.
I build my computer.
ThingsontheWeb 2 years ago
First, I have to say, Ads are Ads, I don't let anyone telling me what to buy. 2nd, I LOVE building my own computer, and I do not have the option of installing OS10, I have to choose between Win, and Lin.
Buy a Mac, ok. I'm a PC, ok.
I'm a builder and I buy parts. Why? Something I've been doing since the mid 90's and until I get sick of it, I'll be a Linux and Windows user. OS10 is great, but lacks the most important thing to me. It lacks to let me, be me.
Nice editing on the vid Mr Bit!
ThingsontheWeb 2 years ago 3
For shame whoever voted down the above comment.
bombkangaroo 2 years ago 2
Never set mac os x free. This is how i see it, apple innovates on there hardware and software and it shows. I saw apple introducing isights on most of there computers as standards, soon after hp and dell did the same on some of there computers. I see apple with back lit keyboards and now is see dell and other doing the same. I see apple using ddr 3 ram on all of their mac, other computer companies are slowly doing this now. I see apple innovating and other following apple. Thats what I see.
ibpointless2 2 years ago 2
very true dude.....what about 'chicklet' keyboard, slot loading dvd drive, multi touch.......
rossel0203113 2 years ago
wow
killer1snoop 2 years ago
This is directed toward Jack aka Dragonballjuijitsu if he's reading this. Would you unblock me from your channel? I know we had a disagreement on Laptops some months ago, however I still would like to comment on your channel even if we don't always see eye to eye on some issues.
blacksteel25 2 years ago
crazy another laptop hunter ad just came out.
ASCII808 2 years ago
I'm liking what I'm seeing in Windows 7 too. Waiting on the RC build supposed to be released in May, was going to be April.
Windows has focused on the software commercials too like 8 vs 80 and the 4 year old editing a photograph. So it wasn't always directed toward hardware like these two commercials. Anyway, get well Mrbit...
blacksteel25 2 years ago
no doubt, but the response to apple is with hardware, was my point. yea the dang allergies are killing me.
mrbit10 2 years ago
Great vid..
q8kuwait10 2 years ago
Great video, awesome editing. What program(s) did you use?
thefamilyk 2 years ago
final cut studio and acid pro combined with soundtrack pro for the audio.
mrbit10 2 years ago
Awesome editing and video in general.
christheferal 2 years ago
Interesting new video style ya got here MrBit. Simple and to the point :)
Zenn3k 2 years ago
ha its called being sick and not able to speak!!! ;)
mrbit10 2 years ago
I agree 100% with this video. The way I see it, only good thing about running windows is the hardware. And the only good thing about mac is the software, and their advertising reflects that. When you ask a windows fanboy about what's so great about windows, 9/10 they will start talking about hardware, and price. Ask a mac fanboy what's so great about macs, they will say the things that are in the commercials.
oOTheAlchemistOo 2 years ago 7
yup
xxxxDre4mxxxx 2 years ago
I am a computer fanboy; Microsoft supports more companies than Apple and the hardware is by far better and cheaper for a pc, on the other hand OSX is very stable and secure but that isn't because it is better it is because it doesn't have the same support and openness as windows and has a smaller share of the market. If the roles were reversed the issues would be reversed. For a laptop go apple for a desktop go PC my views.
IKLIPTIC 2 years ago
watch my old set os x free vids. Many project the problems of windows on other OSs. The problem is that the Operating Systems are different and Windows has legacy that has haunted it and has lead to many of its weaknesses. Apple will have issues just as they are creeping in with the switch to intel, but it will never be another windows and could never run on as much as windows does either.
mrbit10 2 years ago
That's not true. OS X is more stable and secure than Windows because it is UNIX based and Unix's main focus is stability and security. That is a myth, excuse my language but Windows is that way because it is a piece of shit.
oOTheAlchemistOo 2 years ago
windows 2000 was stable nt 4.0 was stable xp is stable; 98 SE was very stable; UNIX makes OSX a great system but if you believe that it would not suffer the same fate as windows if the tables were turned your lying to yourself.
IKLIPTIC 2 years ago
Windows 2000 was stable yes, NT4.0 was stable yes. 98 SE don't know about that. BUT Windows XP was not stable. Win XP is bluescreen haven. Also to add it's about as secure as a KKK klansman walking through the projects in full gear. I am not lying to myself you see because OS X (btw I am a linux guy not mac to be clear) is based on BSD, which is the best kind of UNIX. And if it was on a lot of systems it would not face the same fate as windows. Linux runs fine on just about anything.
oOTheAlchemistOo 2 years ago
I love UNIX but XP is very stable; it may have had issues in the past but its been stable for quite some time. If MS would switch over it would be nice but highly unlikely.
IKLIPTIC 2 years ago
What about plan 9? that is the successor to unix.
ASCII808 2 years ago
Plan 9 is pretty good.
oOTheAlchemistOo 2 years ago
Windows fate is its registry. it can run well but the registry bad design turns it into crap after prolonged installing, and uninstalling. If you leave windows with the same applications for a long time, it will be stable, not as stable as unix, but it will be stable. the record up times are on netcraft have windows pretty close to the top, but BSD, AIX beats it. windows runs well as a business machine because most of the time it usually has the same applications on it for prolonged periods.
ASCII808 2 years ago
That I agree with, I hate the registry.
oOTheAlchemistOo 2 years ago
I like reg hacks though.
moniker127 2 years ago
Apple has been coasting on these snobby ads for a while now. I agree that the best solution is to set OSX free to run on any hardware, retail or home built. I would love to run OSX, I just can't afford a decent Mac, and I already have a decent PC. Let competition decide...I think Apple is still scared that they can't justify their ridiculous hardware prices in a down economy. What am I saying? Mactards will sell a kidney to afford this stuff. Scott Bourne, I'm talking to you!
martinitime1975 2 years ago
The video is well put together. Nice job Sir Bit10
oOADROo 2 years ago
Apple's ads actually tell you something in a back of mind kind of way. Microsoft's ads are just retarded that absolutely don't tell anything and are completely stupid humor filled with things like I have a beard and I where blue jeans. WTF? Apple actually compares and shares what it does, Microsoft just promotes that OEMs are cheaper with much less hardware installed.
Dark4Vendetta 2 years ago
Funny the part about I have a beard, and PC. If we look at stereotypes, then grow that beard long and become a UNIX hacker, or looking at it another way, if you use UNIX you are supposed to have a beard. Hacker is used here to mean someone who takes an interest in programming and computers at a deeper level, rather than a cracker.
gr1moire2112 2 years ago
Amazing video. Simple, clear, really good!
5 stars for sure !!
Sven88abc 2 years ago
Wow, that's nicest text based MVP video and more importantly what you said is so true!!
sunnz 2 years ago
I really enjoyed the editing on this video and I like the way you incorporated your take on the new ad campaign.
IridiumVIII 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
good stuff man.
bullboykennels 2 years ago