Animation comparison

[itsazy]

q1. n

q2. n

q3. can't tell

[folta1]

q1:nope

q2: n/a

q3: i reckon animation 2 as it it lands a bit more realisticly and it seems to be better affected by gravity even though the other looks good. put em into a fight and see what happens ;)

Ifan

[Tonk3h]

@folta1 cheers dude!

[gemziibaybii]

Q1. No

Q2. n/a

Q3. animation 1, looks more realistic as its not perfect and it moves to keep its balance. it takes the same course of action that a human would take.

[Bean2k1x]

q1 Y

q2 Character Animation Masters

q3 Anim 2

q4 The weight of the character on take-off and landing seem more realistic. Also the timing of the whole action feels more correct.

[Tonk3h]

@Bean2k1x

Hey mate thanks for feedback. Just wondering if i know you through somewhere or are you just randomly browsing?

Where did you study animation masters?

Cheers!

[Tonk3h]

@Bean2k1x

Oh just realised it's you james! how ya doing? I've got some more SFX (physical) work experience on friday! :)

[Bean2k1x]

@Tonk3h Hey Dan, noticed charli had joined to help you out so thought I might lend a hand too. Its cool your managing to get some experience, all about getting as much as possible. I just moved companies, working at Cinesite now and I'm living in London so lots going on. All the best with your project, looking forward to seeing some updates on facebook :D Good luck!!

[Kerryrawlings]

No

N/A

Animation 2

Looked more stable stance wise when coming out of kick. Thought 1 looked slightly robotic and less fluid. Really close call tho.

[Tonk3h]

thanks a lot guys! some great feedback here

[nickgloucester]

1) No

2) n/a

3) Animation 2

4) Animation 2 looked smoother whereas animation 1 looked slightly disjointed

(but what do I know about character animation!)

[Simonatron]

Q1 No

Q3 Second ones looks more human with the lack of balance and footing.

First looks to "Perfect"

[AdamMerry]

nope

first one because the movement seems more based around a natural gravity set and adjusts the upper half of its body after the kick

[ajsdlfja]

q1: no

q3: animation 2

q4: for me that one seemed more fluid, can't really explain why though

[mufcmafia]

q1, yes

q2, cgi and mocap

q3, animation 1 beacuse it moves as it keeps balance at the end rather than going straight into a ridgid stance

[Tonk3h]

@mufcmafia cheers!

[souperman12345]

q1, not really

q2, N/a

q3, Number 1, but very close

q4, More fluid, the second looked a little too floaty/smooth, slightly too perfect. First one included what seemed to be breathing at the end, looked like a real person would stand after kicking, but Number 2's kick did look more realistic, just the end didnt. overall number 1 though.

[dislexsicknik]

Number 1 is more life like

[Tonk3h]

Cheers guys, great help!

[pulsex0r]

q1 = no

q2 = n/a

q 3 = the first one looked more human like

q4= because i thought this animation had a more lifelike stance

[caspianholdings]

yo mate, how you doing?

I don't have any background or exp with character animation.

I think animation 1 looked more lifelike / human as animation 2 seemed more rigid and i preferred the way the arms continued to move after the jump

hope this helps