john 14:6 Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." Answer to your statement 3:03-3:15.
@AssyrianMelka3 Also, it wasn't Apollo that said that. It was the man Yahshuah, the Christ. If you really believe it, you'd better at least get the right person involved, otherwise your chances of getting to the Father seem pretty slim. In other words you better start listening (or thinking for yourself independently of the Church's Satanic influence--that works too).
Jesus was a true and faithful messenger of God. His words cannot be separated from God's truth. He brings salvation for all Jews and Gentiles. Paul's words must be examined closely, for example he call's himself a member of the "Way". Everyone knows that is a Taoist term, not a Christian one. Paul introduces Gnostic teachings, the world is the domain of Satan. Paul baptizes people in the name of Jesus alone, instead of following Matt command Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
Just so you know my friend, "the father, son and holy spirit trinity verses or implications are only found in two places in the entire bible; 1 John 5:7 and Matt 28, both of which cases were never in the original Hebrew scrolls and was admitted by the Catholic church that it was never there, but they themselves put it there, look it up, its in the catholic encylopedia, you have been duped, knowledge is power.
@ReligiousFreedom666 That's ok I deleted it and blocked you already. But given the display of maturity here, I've unblocked you in case you have something more pertinent and less inflammatory to say. :-)
Interesting claim but I think it's wrong. What about those who do right, i.e., are a law unto themselves, having never read the Scriptures yet followed them intuitively? I was speaking with an elder a few days ago (my uncle) and we discussed truth, and whether or not it was inherently within every human being, spiritually, or only those who are called the elect. Meaning "The Kingdom of Heaven is within you" just as Yahushua said.
i would also like to point out im not persecuting you disagreement does not equal persecution jesus was persecuted and so where the apostles and i think jesus said it best when he said matt 7 3 why do you look at the spec in your bothers eye but dont notice the log that is in your eye and if your affended at me dont be these are not my words but christs so be offended at him
@prettybabs25 What log? Show me where I have erred. You stand condemned by your own words (admitting that you are in error), by scripture, and by reason. This is not a matter of pride. It's a matter of truth. If you don't like the message, don't think that gives you any right to attack the messenger and then go on to say that it doesn't amount to persecution. Just because you're offensive, that doesn't mean I'm offended. I forgive you.
@malakhhatzadik i have niether admitted my error nor condemmed myself your the one condemming christains and pridefullly saying your a true christain yet your denying the bibles teachings and saying jesus never said there was another way your judging christains ver harshly and calling them luciferians that is where your prideful and that trait comes straight from lucifer therefor your the luciferian
@prettybabs25 I have never denied the Bible's teachings in my whole entire life--just the CHURCH's teachings which the Bible refers to as "doctrines of devils." I call you Luciferians because THAT'S WHAT YOU ARE. I was willing to put up with this just in case there was any hope of saving you, but it's beyond obvious what your agenda is.
Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. Matthew 5:11
Speaking of pride... nice screenname. Isn't it ironic how every time the arrogant fool has nothing else to fall back on, he projects his own personality flaws onto the subject of his belligerence?
prettybabs25 #1 - "we ALL have it wrong"
prettybabs25 #2 - "i have niether admitted my error nor condemmed myself"
@prettybabs25 What Malakh is trying to teach you in these videos is as much the result of his emotionless analysis and cold, hard math as it is of his life-long dedication to the truth (God). Pride has nothing to do with it. Also, it is common knowlege that Christians are among the most pridefull of all people. After all, they have found "Jesus" and can now go ahead and associate their names with His and lay claim to his authority and purity even though they have none. That's pride, my friend.
i hope i dont offend you in what im going to say and you dont have to post anything i dont care i simply want to converse,im not sure exactly the point your making your attacking christains yet you claim to be one and you say you follow christs teaching more than other christains which to me sounds like pride and jesus says to be humble and to love others and not tear them down so in my opinion (i hope you dont get angry)but you mite be suffering from the same hypocracy as any other christain
and here is where i think the bible mentions you and plkease understand i have no anamosity toward you at all and i hope we can have a good dialect becasue i do think people should live up to their beliefs and all people no matter their religion is guilty of hypocracy because we are all imperfect gal 1 7-8 which is really not another.only there are some who are distorting the gospel even if an angel comes preaching another gospel he is to be accursed
@prettybabs25 That is MY point exactly. All I've done is explain what that antigospel is and what's wrong with it. If that makes you angry and you have to resort to petty name-calling rather than so much as watching the videos and hearing what is said, then that makes you antichrist, doesn't it?
Blessed are you whenever people insult you, persecute you, and say all sorts of evil things against you falsely because of me. Matthew 5:11
If you want to converse with me, then start listening.
@malakhhatzadik well my point is that as a christain if you are a true christain you dont judge other people if you judge others you will be judged you claim to be a true christain yet your doing the oppasite of the very thing jesus commanded most which was to love he didnt say love everyone but a hypocrit or no one would be loved your pointing out why christains have it wrong when the truth is we ALL have it wrong if i have the gift of profecy but no love it is worthless
@prettybabs25 Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters? Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life? If then ye have judgments of things pertaining to this life, set them to judge who are least esteemed in the church. I speak to your shame. Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you? no, not one that shall be able to judge between his brethren?
@malakhhatzadik james 411 do not speak against one another,brethren he who speaks against a brotheror judges his brother 12 there is only one lawgiver and judge the one who is able to save and destroy but who are you to judge your neighbor james 4 16 but as it is you boast in your arragance all such boasting is evil
@prettybabs25 How do you figure I am boasting? Your whole argument against me completely circumvents truth and is predicated on that. What if it's just a malicious pre-programmed knee-jerk response? What if what I'm saying actually has relevance? You would do well to heed it. I have never spoken of myself. I only speak of the remission of sins and the kingdom of heaven. Your false accusations will not go unpunished, and blasphemy against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven. Repent.
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man. For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? but we have the mind of Christ.
@malakhhatzadik once again you have too much pride for all have sinned and come short of the glory of God 1 john 1 7-9 read it apply it jude 1 read your causing devisions and confusion ponting out why the bible is wrong james 2 15
@prettybabs25 Pointing out why the Bible is wrong??? You obviously haven't even listened to a single word I've said. I've only ever upheld the Bible against malicious "Christians" like you. You'd kill Christ again if you had the chance.
@malakhhatzadik james 2 13 -18 who among you is wise and understanding?let him show by his good behavior his deed in the gentleness of wisdom but if yiy have bitterness and jealosy and selfish ambition in your heart,dont be arragant asnd so lie against the truth this wisdom is not that which comes down from above but is erthly,natural,demonic.for where jealosy and selfish ambition existthere is disorder and every evil thing wisdom from above is pure
@prettybabs25 How does "gentleness of wisdom" not apply to me? You have accused me about a dozen times of arrogance and pride, but you have no cause whatsoever to do so. And why do people like you always insist on killing the messenger when you don't like the message? It's not as though God's happy about the fact that you do it. Satan = Accuser. And you call ME demonic?...
@malakhhatzadik then peacable,gentle,reasonable,FULL of MERCY and good fruits,unwavering,without hypocrisy and the seed whos fruit is rightousness is sownin peace by those who make peacejames 4 6 but god gives a greater grace.therefore it says God is opposed to the proud but gives grace to the humble
@prettybabs25 Where does the Bible say I'm proud? You have no idea how hard it was for me to show my face to the world in such a way as to incur such vicious attacks as I get every day from people like you. I knew it would be this way, "for so persecuted they the prophets" before me. It took a great and irrevocable act of humility on my part. Who are you to take away my righteousness? Who are you to judge me and say false things about me because I dare to speak of Christ and Almighty God?
john 14 6 jesus said to them i am the way the truth and the life no one comes to the father but by me if you had known me you would know my father my father also from now on you know him and have seen him john 12 45 he who sees me sees the one who sent me last but not least it brings me to my punchline gal 1 6 i am amazed that your so quikly deserting him who called you by the grace of christ for another gospel
@okamichamploo I pulled it out of one of my own books (The Nazarene Way) where I listed "Noble Eightfold Path" by The Buddhist Temple of Chicago as the reference. budtempchi(dot)org/39(dot)html
@okamichamploo I pulled it out of one of my own books (The Nazarene Way) where I listed "Noble Eightfold Path" by The Buddhist Temple of Chicago as the reference. budtempchi(dot)org/39(dot)h+t+m+l
@okamichamploo I pulled it out of one of my own books (The Nazarene Way) where I listed "Noble Eightfold Path" by The Buddhist Temple of Chicago as the reference. budtempchi(dot)org/39(dot)h_t_m_l
this is YOUR interpretation....why should i just take what you have discerned as absolute truth? you first say "christianity" is lucfierianism...AND you say it is the ANTITHESIS to Judaism, BUT when i say paganism/luciferianism are the anithesis to judaism...i'm wrong? so where are we not understanding each other here??? i've approached nothing, but respectfully so i do not appreciate your condescending tone....if you want to be taken seriously PROVE your point to me...b/c now your just talking
@yankpo No, it's not MY INTERPRETATION; it's THE TRUTH. I have never implied that you ought to "just take it" as the absolute truth... that's up to you to figure that out. However, it would be a LIE to say other than that it is the truth just to get a troll like you to have your egoistic feelings stroked, which I have NO INTEREST in doing for you. I have MORE than explained myself and rid myself of the burden of proof here and elsewhere. If you don't already know what I know, that's YOUR fault.
@yankpo Either way I've already proved it to you, and your failure to listen does not constitute a valid counterargument. The problem with people like you is that you think an idiot notion or mere opinion is just as valid as any other, and care more about being heard than about learning or understanding. If this was a court of law you wouldn't be able to merely plead ignorance when the verdict is already in. What makes you think you'll be able to do so when you are judged by God's messengers?
@yankpo When it comes to matters of religion, I don't feel. I just think. Taoism is too overtly mechanical for my tastes, but pretty sound metaphysically overall. I know a good Taoist who has as much love for truth, for man, and for YHWH as anyone. Judging by the fruits, all I can say is that this one person represents the Christian/Biblical ideology well.
@malakhhatzadi well I respect that approach. Feel may have not been the correct way to phrase my question. As far as Christianity being the antithesis to Judaism I do not believe that was Yashua's intention. I think he really felt he was fulfilling messianic prophecy therefore not attempting to create another religion, but redeem HIS religion Judiasm. This is my generalization from what I can tell. The real antithesis to Judaism in my eyes is paganism/luciferianism now cloaked in "Christianity"
@yankpo OK, think what you want. These videos are for people who care enough about the truth to educate themselves, even (especially) if it means overturning their preconceived opinions about the facts I've presented. The facts are that Judaism = Luciferianism = "Christianity," and "Christianity" (or Judaism) and Christianity are polar opposites, and presenting them as such was very very very very very obviously the intent of Yahshuah's testimony and of that of the Bible's authors.
I think this is a wonderful thought out video. However as a person of no particular religion that love both Buddhism and the teachings of Christ, I have to interject here where you are saying that humans are imperfect by nature and that only Christianity says this in scripture. This may be true but we are basically flawed to a certain degree.....simply because WE ARE HUMANS. I personally believe we are God's offspring and like children, we are not inherently evil but not all-knowing like God.
To be imperfect is not to be a sinner. The scriptures teach us that we are by nature sinless, but the doctrines of Christianity teach that we are by nature sinful. What I have said is that we are not sinners by nature, not that we are not imperfect by nature, or that we are all-knowing and all-loving either. What we perceive as flaws are imperfections, not flaws. To call it a flaw is to imply a mistake in the design. I hope that helps clear up the misunderstanding.
Do you mean in the NT of the book "the scriptures"?
I am searching for the truth, because I am experiencing demons after having done something spiritualistic: the recording of EVPs :( Hope your vids will help, am thinking of buying your nazarene book.
@crippled82 Although I would still suggest you read it, I haven't covered demon possession in much detail in that book. If you want to see my and some other interesting thoughts on the subject go to my forum (libermundus-dot-org) and look for the "how vulnerable are we to demons?" thread. Cheers.
No. "Christianity" is much closer to the actual Luciferian doctrines than any of the other world religions, which are all derivations of it to some extent or another. So much so that it's the only one with that particular doctrine. The reason it is a Luciferian belief is that it distinguishes between men and gods, the men obviously being inferior, but says that ALL men are less than pond scum, whereas Judaism claims that Jews are exceptions, that all Jews are gods (Talmud).
I agree but I wouldn't call them religions cults would be a better word or a corporation seems even more appropriate but strangely enough out of those three Anton Laveys church of satan seems to be the only one that makes any attempt to teach a type of dharma but dont worry I do know that its a purely selfish bastardized version but its telling that the other 2 dont even make an attempt.
By that definition every religion is a cult/corporation... even that Brahmanic practice so often mistaken for Buddhism. Unfortunately not everyone has your/our understanding of the meanings of words, or can articulate ideas as well, or even have similar thoughts, and these videos are targeted at a baser audience--the kind which needs to be told things which are grossly apparent, like the fact that the doctrines of mainstream Christianity are absurd.
I got as far as 2:20, yawned and had to correct you. Jesus preached the Kingdom of God AND that HE was the ONLY WAY to it.. How do Buddhists tell evil from good? How can you trust your thoughts to guide you? You say "all that we say and do arises from our thoughts" .. how can your thoughts contemplate themselves to verify whether they are evil or good if they are all from the same source? as in "right mindfulness means to cherish good and pure thoughts" .. how do thoughts discern each other? huh
You have preempted my logic? What does that explain? I have quoted you in my questions, can you not reply in kind with intelligent answers instead of overbearing sarcism? I only yawned .. You need to be a little more incisive and comprehensive in your analysis of my queries to satisfy anyone reading this who have more than elementary schooling.
Did I stutter? Maybe if you were to actually WATCH the videos you'd know that your foot is already so deep inside your mouth that that the reason you can't hear me is that your toes are blocking your ears. Metaphorically speaking of course.
All Christians. Christianity is defined by Wikipedia as "a monotheistic religion based on the life and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth as presented in the New Testament." If you will pay attention c. 1:55 (and throughout the videos) you will see that the "Christians" have not actually based their religion on the teachings of this man.
Did you omit the explicit belief of MANY deities in the Hindu/Budhist/Taoist and ancient religions along with the lip service paid to 'false' gods in Judaism and Islam for any particular reason? Are they not included as Polytheistic in your definition because they include among their pantheon a Definite godhead who has absolute sovereignty? Although even their Sovereigns had multiple personalities, resembling this luciferian dichotomy you're talking about.
Buddhism unequals Hinduism and Taoism, and belief unequals worship. You'll find the same "gods" deliberated on extensively in the Bible, and you will find the worship of them nowhere in Buddhism (that is, the Buddhist philosophy, which you have apparently confused with Brahmanism).
You claim that you don't find the concept of "original sin" in other religions (specifically buddhism and taoism). Would you not consider Karma (simplified perhaps could be called innate bondage to this world due to some part of our nature) which is to be escaped by enlightenment of sorts as a correlative to the greater Sin? I agree that modern christians have no context for this and misunderstand it, but it is not new to christianity.
Karma = natural consequence. The idea of karma depends on merit (how much or how little karmic action a person engages in). It has nothing to do with sin.
I am enjoying your thoughts. I would like to have dialogue with you, but am not a Youtube regular. Do you have a forum/can we directly speak via e-mail?
You also indicated that the teaching of "original sin" is incorrect. Are you also saying that this teaching of "original sin" and the only way of salvation being through Jesus Christ found in Romans 5 is incorrect as well?
Read the passage carefully: "Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression..." (v. 14).
And what do you mean by that? Are you thinking in context with v. 12: "Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned-- " "All" means everyone. And what about v. 21: "so that, as sin reigned in death, even so grace would reign through righteousness to eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." Anyone with an honest evaluation can see that Romans 5 declares that all have sinned, and Jesus is the answer.
Unlike the notion you have presented (which is actually refuted in its own context, as I have demonstrated), there are numerous passages that I could evoke which clearly leave no room for interpretation but debunk the Luciferian doctrine of original sin. e.g., 1 John 3: 7-10: "Everyone having been born of Elohim does not sin, because His seed stays in him, and he is powerless to sin..."
What I think you fail to realize, and only because you haven't even watched the videos, is that the doctrine of original sin claims that we are sinful BY NATURE, which not only makes God the ultimate culprit for our privative actions, but also a malevolent deity for punishing people who never even had a chance to get "saved" (an IMPOSSIBLE feat according to the doctrine) because they were born in the wrong place and time or whatever.
"If we say that we have no sin, we are deceiving ourselves and the truth is not in us." (1 John 1:8)
malakhhatzadik, "The Lord rebuke you!" (Jude 1:9)
While I certainly hope that you will soon allow God to use the intelligence He gave you for promoting truth, I am glad that the error and heresy you present can be clearly seen by others.
"Though they intended evil against You and devised a plot, they will not succeed." (Psalm 21:11)
This is interesting. I've often thought about Adam's sin and how it supposedly cursed the rest of us. If that is true then we're sinners by birth, i.e., original sin, and therefore it could be argued that we are not responsible for our sins. If this is true then your statement would be right, and YHWH would be responsible for our sin. This contradicts other scriptures to the contrary, so original sin cannot be true.
You stated that Jesus did not preach Himself as the "end-all", if you will, to salvation and eternal life. How then would you explain a passage such as John 14:6: "Jesus said to him, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me."
And, in which video do you answer my question please? No, it is not reasonable for you to ask me to watch all 50. I intend to give you a fair hearing, and I originally had planned on watching all 50, but your answer to this question will inform me whether you are indeed seeking truth, and if it is worth my time to even continue. Thank you.
Give me a fair hearing? Oh, thank you, benevolent master.
Again, I have nothing to prove to you. You're the one seeking truth, not me. I don't lack what I have, and I don't throw pearls before swine. Watch them or don't watch them, but please don't pretend like your judgment matters.
At the same time, I was very concerned by what you presented about Jesus being the messenger vs. the message in the fourth video. Instead of making a concluding statement at this point, let me simply ask you something. Your answer will prove to me whether you are indeed seeking truth honestly, instead of subtly promoting human opinions, or your own cult, rather than literally interpreted Scripture.
Actually, you do. If you are not willing to be straightforward with people who ask you to clarify, you involunatarily prove that you are not being honest with yourself or others. I hope you can "prove" that indeed you are.
I have always spoken plainly and honestly and answered everyone who has made sincere inquiries. Clearly you are the one who has something to prove (your sincerity, by watching/listening and proving it against scripture/reason/truth).
Thank you for your effort in sharing your perspectives in these videos.
Right now, I am at number 4 of 50. I have to say that you seem to have done a lot of research, and I have no doubt learned some helpful facts that are indisputable, such as the different cannons.
I dont understand why your quoting jesus, if you believe him to be the antichrist. Or are you just using the term "jesus" so people know who your talking about?
This is EXCELLENT. Thank you for this! You are helping me put the pieces together that I have been looking for for a long time. I knew about the demiurge and that Christians were Luciferians but I didn't know how or what happened to make it that way. I was raised "Christian" and I knew it didn't make sense and the more I looked for answers the more I was confused by the answers that I got.
The blind see, and the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, and the deaf hear, the dead rise up, and the gospel is preached to the poor. That is the coming of the kingdom, or rather in these saving works the kingdom is already there. By the overcoming and removal of misery, of need, of sickness, by these actual effects John is to see that the new time has arrived. James p. 86
And as it awaits men to die once, and after this the judgment, so also the Messiah, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, shall appear a second time, apart from sin, to those waiting for Him, unto deliverance. Hebrews 9:27-28
I think your view doesn't portray true Christianity. I can understand why because the "religion" takes on so many faces that one studing the religion can come many conclusions.
You mention the Gospel. Gospel means good news. So you can use gospel in front of any number of phrases.
The real Gospel of the Bible is that man is conceived in sin and as such must be judged. God loved his creation so much that he came as Jesus to provide an atonement of sin. We no longer fear God's judgement.
There was only one gospel that was ever preached in the NT. That is the gospel of the kingdom of heaven. Know what the Bible says about the others?
I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. Gal 1
Are you talking about Jesus or Yahshuah now? It makes all the difference, but the way you phrase the question makes you sound brainwashed, and by consequence, in need of the information in the videos.
To me this is not a matter of belief. It's a matter of fact. Obviously I don't worship Apollo or in some other way deny the Father and the Son, or that Yahshuah has come in the flesh by replacing him with an archetypal god-man. I think I've been pretty consistent on that position.
Ok, I guess the answer to your question is "yes" either way. The Antichrist is still a Christ... just the chief impostor of the real one on whom the teachings of Christianity were originally based, before the deceivers started spreading their false doctrines. The invention of Jesus constitutes the greatest identity theft ever.
Well, I did some research and can say with conviction that yes I'm talking about Yahshuah.
I have been out of work since Nov and have been depending on G_d to get by. Sorry if this is the wrong name. I ask G_d to give me wisdom and boy has he.
Listening to your first four videos is the first time I heard this information. I'm always open to hear differant ideas so the videos so far have been helpful.
Not sure I'll agree with all you have but I'll be looking into it.
Another good one. I have, for a long time, believed that Original Sin is one of the greatest fallacy's included in the Doctrines of the Roman Catholic church. Simply another method of making people feel like they are bad and imperfect; therefore needing the "Church" to redeem themselves. A sound method of control, yet in a very bad way.
In the first 4 videos, maybe. But I also don't condone belief in the doctrines of devils that they've been saying for decades, or subservience to any Satanic and/or Masonic institution which they've been promoting for decades. For instance, while Rastafarians do it because of ignorance, I regard it as an atrocity that the JWs would KNOWINGLY pervert the sacred name of the Most High and then go on telling the world that they alone possess truth. The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend.
I have read a lot more than a couple of verses and that doesnt give me any authority to go around judging people and telling them "you're wrong, I'm right" I'm not god. Maybe that's part of the problem with christians.they go around telling the rest of the world what to do and how to do it. they love to pass judgement.They are the real sinners for behaving like they're gods because they think they know it all when in actuality they only know that one book which was just another book.
You've never been told anything malicious. I see. So Yahshuah and Yohannan and the apostles et al were all liars, the Bible is full of lies, and the Jews and Luciferians who have built the Church and filled your head with their Satanic doctrines are right about everything. Thanks for clearing that up. Cuz ya know... I was thinking I was doing people a favor by telling the truth here. I'll be sure to obey you now instead of God, and quit preaching.
If, on the other hand, your intent is merely to senselessly argue without acknowledging the fact that you've been lied to by malicious persons intent on subverting the truth of the revelations of Christ and the prophets/apostles... if you believe that truth is contrary to plain reason... then I would ask that you simply go about your business and let GOD by my judge. Even if you decide to persist in your error it'll still be for your own good not to strain out whatever you perceive as a gnat.
"How is accepting Jesus as the savior and repenting in our sins Anti-Christian/Luciferean?"
You have demonstrated an adequate capacity to think, despite appearances. I'm sure that if you were to watch the videos instead wasting our time trolling them, you'd figure it out.
I'm not the one who has traded in the teachings of God for the teachings of men. Simply insinuating as much isn't going to make it so, much less refute the perfectly valid and indisputable proofs that have been laid out here.
If you honestly believe that my intent is to pervert the word of God then you simply haven't been paying attention either to me or to the word. You are guilty of every accusation which God Almighty and his prophets have made against you in it, and which I've related in these videos. The fact that you hinge your entire paradigm on a purely Luciferian/Antichristian belief without even addressing the scriptural doctrines proves that and only that.
When Yahshua said "No one comes to the Father except through me," that was in the context of "I am the way, the truth and the life." i.e. "No one comes to the Father except by way of the way, the truth and the life." The way, of course, is love... the way that he taught and exemplified.
Maybe it's not so explicit as you imagined it. If you can't accept that then I wonder what your take on Mark 4:11-12 and 2 Peter 2:1-3 is.
Not only have I adequately addressed this IN ITS CONTEXT in the videos and pointed out that it's the only thing that pseudo-Christians even have to fall back on when their devilish doctrines are exposed, but I've also addressed it about a dozen times in the comments.
I've tried to educate you, but you have to do your part if you want to know the truth.
You earned some credits for mentioning the difference between the Vulgate and the Alexandrian canon, but by now you don't see any difference between a god of wood that's being sold at a discount store and between the true God?
Everytime I'm in such a store, I have the tendency to crush them all and I even like to pay for it.
I'm not here to earn points. I'm here to tell the truth, and if need be, to educate you. By the sound of it, you are malicious toward what you have not yet understood (evidenced by your complete misinterpretation of my position on "a god of wood"), and this is undoubtedly the cause for your ignorance. I've addressed the issue of idolatry very succinctly. Should you choose to continue and listen to what I'm saying without your "I even like to pay for it" spin on it, I'm sure you'll agree with me.
Anyway I doubt you approach a false (cruciform) depiction of the pagan sun god Jesus the same way when you're in Christian book store. Am I right? At least Buddhists aren't idol-worshipers since a Buddha figurine represents the Buddha/Christ ideal rather than any particular god, and is therefore not a subject of veneration...though others (Brahmanic Buddhists, Hindus), rejecting the ideal in favor of symbolic religion, do treat them differently...
I just started to watch your vids, at least I will spend some more time on it due to your comments. Interesting to see that christians, muslims are not the only one divided amongst themselves: Buddhists also do.
Here in the West the only thing you're likely to even see is Mahayana/Tibetan Buddhism, which is only one of dozens of schools of thought, and certainly the most fallacious when it comes to ecumenicism and superstition. It's not hard to find pictures on the Internet of the Dalai Lama shaking hands with the pope. Zen and Amitabha, etc., on the other hand, are completely abstract and not at all religious, since Buddhism is at the core a way of thinking or a way of life. Glad you're going to watch.
The problem is not with which god/gods one worships, but with symbolic religion in general. The symbols and the expressions of an inward faith are given to all, but true understanding and true piety are the portion of the few--those few being those who have a spiritual interpretation of them, not just a "I hate what I see if it doesn't conform to what I expect to see of the divine based on my own cultural influences and limited understanding" mentality. See my other playlist (Luciferian Agenda).
When you speak of Dualism are you talking about moral dualism?
"Moral dualism is the belief of the coexistence (in eastern and naturalistic religions) or conflict (in western religions) between the "benevolent" and the "malignant". Most religious systems have some form of moral dualism - in western religions, for instance, a conflict between good and evil."
No, not moral... metaphysical. All moral systems are derived from metaphysical systems. In order to believe in "evil" you have to believe that it has been derived from somewhere (i.e. that God is evil, or culpable in its creation... which isn't even a problem if you don't believe in its existence).
a number of verses in the Bible (eg. Ps. 7:9, Rev. 2:23) state that God searches out and inspects the kidneys, or "reins", of humans. Similarly, the Talmud (Berakhoth 61.a) states that one of the two kidneys counsels what is good, and the other evil.
Kidneys? How do you get "kidneys" out of "hearts and minds"? I don't think you're asking a serious question, therefore you don't deserve a serious answer. Correct me if I'm mistaken.
Deute 14.8 (the bible); "Also the swine (pig) is unclean for you, because it has cloven hooves, yet does not chew the cud; you shall not eat their flesh or touch their dead carcasses."
check leviticus 11:7(from american standard bible, I would say that this translation would be quite reliable); it clearly says that pig meat is not to be eaten.
You haven't even addressed my answer before moving on to the next question. Is it not a valid question? If you don't think so, why not? Seems like you've got a hit-and-run agenda here, seeing as how you posted the "kidney" question 6 times on 2 videos. Where I come from that's called trolling.
A horse sires a horse, a man begets man, a god brings forth a god. No Jew has ever begotten a Christian as long as the earth has existed. We as a people are not descended from the Jews. -Gospel of Philip
I have a quetion, you say that jesus never says that you must be saved through him, but he does say none can see the father less they go through him. Make me understand your insight please? im not being malicious, i just would like to understand your belieifs better.
When Yahshua said "No one comes to the Father except through me," that was in the context of "I am the way, the truth and the life." i.e. "No one comes to the Father except by way of the way, the truth and the life." The way, of course, is love... the way that he taught and exemplified.
wikipedia disambiguation of reins states that it is an archaic word for kidneys, which in the ancient world where thought to be the seat of ones conscience. no controversy here as I see it.
i cant tell what you are but god is love and yes a spirit. john wrote "in the beinging was the word and the word was with god, and the word was god" and he came to his own and they receieved him not.
Think of heaven in this context (and anywhere you see "the kingdom of heaven" or, as my Bible says, the "reign of the heavens") as a sort of interstellar civilization. Right now it's more like a colony than a full member. The purpose of our present trial is to determine who gets put where in the planet's administrative hierarchy.
Just a thought there are many kinds of Buddhism "THERAVADIN"."MAHAYANA/TANTRIC"."ZEN/JAPANESE/KOREAN"."PURE LAND/CHINESE/JAPANESE" which of these would you say is the one that you pratice or follow ?
Me personally? Theravada. But "pure land" or Amitabha is probably the "best." Mahayana is dualist, and therefore not much better than mainstream Christianity. Also, all Eastern religions except Hinduism are strongly influenced by Buddhism, just like all Western religions except Wicca are influenced by Christianity.
Depending on how you look at it, you could say that my appreciation for the Theravada tradition is a direct result of my love for the Thai culture, or that my love for Thai culture is a direct result of their keeping the Theravada tradition. I have just as much respect for the Lao and Khmer cultures. My affinity with Buddhism comes from the fact that it is natural (as opposed to manmade) religion, if it is indeed religion at all.
THE EIGHTFOLD NOBLE PATH incorporates Right View,Right Intenttion,Right Speech,Right Action,Right Livlihood,Right Effort,Right Mindfulness and Right cConcentration
There is nothing to trust in seeking happiness from outside;you will only become exhausted from suffering,which is without satisfaction and without end. LAMA ZOPA RINPOCHE
I've already blocked him. No need to be so hostile. A kind word turns away wrath.
There are, I believe, no less than a dozen words in Pali that translate to English as "mind," so don't base your whole understanding on that. Buddhism is entirely rational and objective. For Buddhists, the goal of meditation is not to empty the mind (that's just the means) but rather to achieve a state of mindfulness.
Just remember to be specific on what you are condemning Christianity is not evil it is the perversion of the Gospel that is the cause of all the problems. Christianity is not wrong. Religion is wrong.
Okay, I will shut up until I watch all the videos. Sometimes I feel you are bashing Christianity but you really are bashing religion which Jesus also did. So I will not respond again until I have watched entire compilation.
It is nice to be understood. My focus is on Christianity right now simply because I get a lot of questions about it, and because it is so widely practiced, and yet there is enough truth to it for it to be salvageable. If I have the time I'll be posting similar videos on Atheism and Islam, etc.
I will be eagerly anticipating your comments after you have finished. :-) P+L
oh look your back again with your nonesensical comments why do you feel the need to comment as you and all the rest of us know that your just pissed of about no one believing you about what you say about religion have you come here to learn or just to make yourself look even more stupid
2 Chronicles 13:7
Some worthless scoundrels gathered around him and opposed Rehoboam son of Solomon when he was young and indecisive and not strong enough to resist them
john 14:6 Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." Answer to your statement 3:03-3:15.
AssyrianMelka3 11 months ago
@AssyrianMelka3 Gee, I think I've addressed that. ;)
malakhhatzadik 8 months ago
@AssyrianMelka3 Also, it wasn't Apollo that said that. It was the man Yahshuah, the Christ. If you really believe it, you'd better at least get the right person involved, otherwise your chances of getting to the Father seem pretty slim. In other words you better start listening (or thinking for yourself independently of the Church's Satanic influence--that works too).
malakhhatzadik 8 months ago
Jesus was a true and faithful messenger of God. His words cannot be separated from God's truth. He brings salvation for all Jews and Gentiles. Paul's words must be examined closely, for example he call's himself a member of the "Way". Everyone knows that is a Taoist term, not a Christian one. Paul introduces Gnostic teachings, the world is the domain of Satan. Paul baptizes people in the name of Jesus alone, instead of following Matt command Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
LoneMonk1 1 year ago
@LoneMonk1
Just so you know my friend, "the father, son and holy spirit trinity verses or implications are only found in two places in the entire bible; 1 John 5:7 and Matt 28, both of which cases were never in the original Hebrew scrolls and was admitted by the Catholic church that it was never there, but they themselves put it there, look it up, its in the catholic encylopedia, you have been duped, knowledge is power.
pradaluggage2 7 months ago
Sorry for the post on the other page with all the zzzzz's
ReligiousFreedom666 1 year ago
@ReligiousFreedom666 That's ok I deleted it and blocked you already. But given the display of maturity here, I've unblocked you in case you have something more pertinent and less inflammatory to say. :-)
malakhhatzadik 1 year ago
@LuxAuterna
Interesting claim but I think it's wrong. What about those who do right, i.e., are a law unto themselves, having never read the Scriptures yet followed them intuitively? I was speaking with an elder a few days ago (my uncle) and we discussed truth, and whether or not it was inherently within every human being, spiritually, or only those who are called the elect. Meaning "The Kingdom of Heaven is within you" just as Yahushua said.
Greyswyndir 1 year ago
love buddha his vew on lust
MrTrilidge 1 year ago
i would also like to point out im not persecuting you disagreement does not equal persecution jesus was persecuted and so where the apostles and i think jesus said it best when he said matt 7 3 why do you look at the spec in your bothers eye but dont notice the log that is in your eye and if your affended at me dont be these are not my words but christs so be offended at him
prettybabs25 1 year ago
@prettybabs25 What log? Show me where I have erred. You stand condemned by your own words (admitting that you are in error), by scripture, and by reason. This is not a matter of pride. It's a matter of truth. If you don't like the message, don't think that gives you any right to attack the messenger and then go on to say that it doesn't amount to persecution. Just because you're offensive, that doesn't mean I'm offended. I forgive you.
malakhhatzadik 1 year ago
@malakhhatzadik i have niether admitted my error nor condemmed myself your the one condemming christains and pridefullly saying your a true christain yet your denying the bibles teachings and saying jesus never said there was another way your judging christains ver harshly and calling them luciferians that is where your prideful and that trait comes straight from lucifer therefor your the luciferian
prettybabs25 1 year ago
@prettybabs25 I have never denied the Bible's teachings in my whole entire life--just the CHURCH's teachings which the Bible refers to as "doctrines of devils." I call you Luciferians because THAT'S WHAT YOU ARE. I was willing to put up with this just in case there was any hope of saving you, but it's beyond obvious what your agenda is.
Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. Matthew 5:11
*blocked*
malakhhatzadik 1 year ago
Speaking of pride... nice screenname. Isn't it ironic how every time the arrogant fool has nothing else to fall back on, he projects his own personality flaws onto the subject of his belligerence?
prettybabs25 #1 - "we ALL have it wrong"
prettybabs25 #2 - "i have niether admitted my error nor condemmed myself"
Have you tried anti-psychotics?
malakhhatzadik 1 year ago
@prettybabs25 What Malakh is trying to teach you in these videos is as much the result of his emotionless analysis and cold, hard math as it is of his life-long dedication to the truth (God). Pride has nothing to do with it. Also, it is common knowlege that Christians are among the most pridefull of all people. After all, they have found "Jesus" and can now go ahead and associate their names with His and lay claim to his authority and purity even though they have none. That's pride, my friend.
7greenjeans7 1 year ago
i hope i dont offend you in what im going to say and you dont have to post anything i dont care i simply want to converse,im not sure exactly the point your making your attacking christains yet you claim to be one and you say you follow christs teaching more than other christains which to me sounds like pride and jesus says to be humble and to love others and not tear them down so in my opinion (i hope you dont get angry)but you mite be suffering from the same hypocracy as any other christain
prettybabs25 1 year ago
and here is where i think the bible mentions you and plkease understand i have no anamosity toward you at all and i hope we can have a good dialect becasue i do think people should live up to their beliefs and all people no matter their religion is guilty of hypocracy because we are all imperfect gal 1 7-8 which is really not another.only there are some who are distorting the gospel even if an angel comes preaching another gospel he is to be accursed
prettybabs25 1 year ago
@prettybabs25 That is MY point exactly. All I've done is explain what that antigospel is and what's wrong with it. If that makes you angry and you have to resort to petty name-calling rather than so much as watching the videos and hearing what is said, then that makes you antichrist, doesn't it?
Blessed are you whenever people insult you, persecute you, and say all sorts of evil things against you falsely because of me. Matthew 5:11
If you want to converse with me, then start listening.
malakhhatzadik 1 year ago
@malakhhatzadik well my point is that as a christain if you are a true christain you dont judge other people if you judge others you will be judged you claim to be a true christain yet your doing the oppasite of the very thing jesus commanded most which was to love he didnt say love everyone but a hypocrit or no one would be loved your pointing out why christains have it wrong when the truth is we ALL have it wrong if i have the gift of profecy but no love it is worthless
prettybabs25 1 year ago
@prettybabs25 Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters? Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life? If then ye have judgments of things pertaining to this life, set them to judge who are least esteemed in the church. I speak to your shame. Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you? no, not one that shall be able to judge between his brethren?
malakhhatzadik 1 year ago
@malakhhatzadik james 411 do not speak against one another,brethren he who speaks against a brotheror judges his brother 12 there is only one lawgiver and judge the one who is able to save and destroy but who are you to judge your neighbor james 4 16 but as it is you boast in your arragance all such boasting is evil
prettybabs25 1 year ago
@prettybabs25 How do you figure I am boasting? Your whole argument against me completely circumvents truth and is predicated on that. What if it's just a malicious pre-programmed knee-jerk response? What if what I'm saying actually has relevance? You would do well to heed it. I have never spoken of myself. I only speak of the remission of sins and the kingdom of heaven. Your false accusations will not go unpunished, and blasphemy against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven. Repent.
malakhhatzadik 1 year ago
@prettybabs25 "we ALL have it wrong"
Speak for yourself.
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man. For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? but we have the mind of Christ.
malakhhatzadik 1 year ago
@malakhhatzadik once again you have too much pride for all have sinned and come short of the glory of God 1 john 1 7-9 read it apply it jude 1 read your causing devisions and confusion ponting out why the bible is wrong james 2 15
prettybabs25 1 year ago
@prettybabs25 Again, where is my pride? All I've done is answered your questions with patience and humility using scripture.
malakhhatzadik 1 year ago
@prettybabs25 Pointing out why the Bible is wrong??? You obviously haven't even listened to a single word I've said. I've only ever upheld the Bible against malicious "Christians" like you. You'd kill Christ again if you had the chance.
malakhhatzadik 1 year ago
@malakhhatzadik james 2 13 -18 who among you is wise and understanding?let him show by his good behavior his deed in the gentleness of wisdom but if yiy have bitterness and jealosy and selfish ambition in your heart,dont be arragant asnd so lie against the truth this wisdom is not that which comes down from above but is erthly,natural,demonic.for where jealosy and selfish ambition existthere is disorder and every evil thing wisdom from above is pure
prettybabs25 1 year ago
@prettybabs25 How does "gentleness of wisdom" not apply to me? You have accused me about a dozen times of arrogance and pride, but you have no cause whatsoever to do so. And why do people like you always insist on killing the messenger when you don't like the message? It's not as though God's happy about the fact that you do it. Satan = Accuser. And you call ME demonic?...
malakhhatzadik 1 year ago
@malakhhatzadik then peacable,gentle,reasonable,FULL of MERCY and good fruits,unwavering,without hypocrisy and the seed whos fruit is rightousness is sownin peace by those who make peacejames 4 6 but god gives a greater grace.therefore it says God is opposed to the proud but gives grace to the humble
prettybabs25 1 year ago
@prettybabs25 Where does the Bible say I'm proud? You have no idea how hard it was for me to show my face to the world in such a way as to incur such vicious attacks as I get every day from people like you. I knew it would be this way, "for so persecuted they the prophets" before me. It took a great and irrevocable act of humility on my part. Who are you to take away my righteousness? Who are you to judge me and say false things about me because I dare to speak of Christ and Almighty God?
malakhhatzadik 1 year ago
john 14 6 jesus said to them i am the way the truth and the life no one comes to the father but by me if you had known me you would know my father my father also from now on you know him and have seen him john 12 45 he who sees me sees the one who sent me last but not least it brings me to my punchline gal 1 6 i am amazed that your so quikly deserting him who called you by the grace of christ for another gospel
prettybabs25 1 year ago
Shit this guy is blowing my mind.
karlkarlkarl1234 1 year ago
It is very true that most Christians, especially American Christians, are utter hypocrites.
karlkarlkarl1234 1 year ago
were you quoting from a specific book when you explained the eight fold path?
That was probably the most concise and easy to understand explaination I`ve heard.
okamichamploo 1 year ago
@okamichamploo I pulled it out of one of my own books (The Nazarene Way) where I listed "Noble Eightfold Path" by The Buddhist Temple of Chicago as the reference. budtempchi(dot)org/39(dot)html
malakhhatzadik 1 year ago
@okamichamploo I pulled it out of one of my own books (The Nazarene Way) where I listed "Noble Eightfold Path" by The Buddhist Temple of Chicago as the reference. budtempchi(dot)org/39(dot)h+t+m+l
malakhhatzadik 1 year ago
@okamichamploo I pulled it out of one of my own books (The Nazarene Way) where I listed "Noble Eightfold Path" by The Buddhist Temple of Chicago as the reference. budtempchi(dot)org/39(dot)h_t_m_l
malakhhatzadik 1 year ago
this is YOUR interpretation....why should i just take what you have discerned as absolute truth? you first say "christianity" is lucfierianism...AND you say it is the ANTITHESIS to Judaism, BUT when i say paganism/luciferianism are the anithesis to judaism...i'm wrong? so where are we not understanding each other here??? i've approached nothing, but respectfully so i do not appreciate your condescending tone....if you want to be taken seriously PROVE your point to me...b/c now your just talking
yankpo 1 year ago
@yankpo No, it's not MY INTERPRETATION; it's THE TRUTH. I have never implied that you ought to "just take it" as the absolute truth... that's up to you to figure that out. However, it would be a LIE to say other than that it is the truth just to get a troll like you to have your egoistic feelings stroked, which I have NO INTEREST in doing for you. I have MORE than explained myself and rid myself of the burden of proof here and elsewhere. If you don't already know what I know, that's YOUR fault.
malakhhatzadik 1 year ago
@yankpo Either way I've already proved it to you, and your failure to listen does not constitute a valid counterargument. The problem with people like you is that you think an idiot notion or mere opinion is just as valid as any other, and care more about being heard than about learning or understanding. If this was a court of law you wouldn't be able to merely plead ignorance when the verdict is already in. What makes you think you'll be able to do so when you are judged by God's messengers?
malakhhatzadik 1 year ago
how do you feel about taoism??
yankpo 1 year ago
@yankpo When it comes to matters of religion, I don't feel. I just think. Taoism is too overtly mechanical for my tastes, but pretty sound metaphysically overall. I know a good Taoist who has as much love for truth, for man, and for YHWH as anyone. Judging by the fruits, all I can say is that this one person represents the Christian/Biblical ideology well.
malakhhatzadik 1 year ago
@malakhhatzadi well I respect that approach. Feel may have not been the correct way to phrase my question. As far as Christianity being the antithesis to Judaism I do not believe that was Yashua's intention. I think he really felt he was fulfilling messianic prophecy therefore not attempting to create another religion, but redeem HIS religion Judiasm. This is my generalization from what I can tell. The real antithesis to Judaism in my eyes is paganism/luciferianism now cloaked in "Christianity"
yankpo 1 year ago
@yankpo OK, think what you want. These videos are for people who care enough about the truth to educate themselves, even (especially) if it means overturning their preconceived opinions about the facts I've presented. The facts are that Judaism = Luciferianism = "Christianity," and "Christianity" (or Judaism) and Christianity are polar opposites, and presenting them as such was very very very very very obviously the intent of Yahshuah's testimony and of that of the Bible's authors.
malakhhatzadik 1 year ago
I think this is a wonderful thought out video. However as a person of no particular religion that love both Buddhism and the teachings of Christ, I have to interject here where you are saying that humans are imperfect by nature and that only Christianity says this in scripture. This may be true but we are basically flawed to a certain degree.....simply because WE ARE HUMANS. I personally believe we are God's offspring and like children, we are not inherently evil but not all-knowing like God.
GrayAreaGirl 2 years ago
To be imperfect is not to be a sinner. The scriptures teach us that we are by nature sinless, but the doctrines of Christianity teach that we are by nature sinful. What I have said is that we are not sinners by nature, not that we are not imperfect by nature, or that we are all-knowing and all-loving either. What we perceive as flaws are imperfections, not flaws. To call it a flaw is to imply a mistake in the design. I hope that helps clear up the misunderstanding.
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
@malakhhatzadik
Do you mean in the NT of the book "the scriptures"?
I am searching for the truth, because I am experiencing demons after having done something spiritualistic: the recording of EVPs :( Hope your vids will help, am thinking of buying your nazarene book.
crippled82 1 year ago
@crippled82 Although I would still suggest you read it, I haven't covered demon possession in much detail in that book. If you want to see my and some other interesting thoughts on the subject go to my forum (libermundus-dot-org) and look for the "how vulnerable are we to demons?" thread. Cheers.
malakhhatzadik 1 year ago
You are so right. Thank you. Love is everything. Love and be loved. :)
GrayAreaGirl 2 years ago
Are you not contradicting yourself when you say Judaism is Luciferian, but only Christianity has the sinner by nature belief?
UnoRaza 2 years ago
No. "Christianity" is much closer to the actual Luciferian doctrines than any of the other world religions, which are all derivations of it to some extent or another. So much so that it's the only one with that particular doctrine. The reason it is a Luciferian belief is that it distinguishes between men and gods, the men obviously being inferior, but says that ALL men are less than pond scum, whereas Judaism claims that Jews are exceptions, that all Jews are gods (Talmud).
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
All religions at the core teach dharma
hartejoseph 2 years ago
Does Satanism teach dharma? Does Judaism teach dharma? Does Scientology teach dharma?
It's dogmatic sophisms like this which I have tried to dispell.
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
I agree but I wouldn't call them religions cults would be a better word or a corporation seems even more appropriate but strangely enough out of those three Anton Laveys church of satan seems to be the only one that makes any attempt to teach a type of dharma but dont worry I do know that its a purely selfish bastardized version but its telling that the other 2 dont even make an attempt.
hartejoseph 2 years ago
By that definition every religion is a cult/corporation... even that Brahmanic practice so often mistaken for Buddhism. Unfortunately not everyone has your/our understanding of the meanings of words, or can articulate ideas as well, or even have similar thoughts, and these videos are targeted at a baser audience--the kind which needs to be told things which are grossly apparent, like the fact that the doctrines of mainstream Christianity are absurd.
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
I got as far as 2:20, yawned and had to correct you. Jesus preached the Kingdom of God AND that HE was the ONLY WAY to it.. How do Buddhists tell evil from good? How can you trust your thoughts to guide you? You say "all that we say and do arises from our thoughts" .. how can your thoughts contemplate themselves to verify whether they are evil or good if they are all from the same source? as in "right mindfulness means to cherish good and pure thoughts" .. how do thoughts discern each other? huh
OneFifthNative 2 years ago
I've already preempted your poor logic. Keep watching, or else go back to watching American Idol and leave the deep end for the adults.
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
You have preempted my logic? What does that explain? I have quoted you in my questions, can you not reply in kind with intelligent answers instead of overbearing sarcism? I only yawned .. You need to be a little more incisive and comprehensive in your analysis of my queries to satisfy anyone reading this who have more than elementary schooling.
OneFifthNative 2 years ago
Did I stutter? Maybe if you were to actually WATCH the videos you'd know that your foot is already so deep inside your mouth that that the reason you can't hear me is that your toes are blocking your ears. Metaphorically speaking of course.
*blocked*
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
One concept that did not match with raising two children is that of being born sinners.
My girls were pure, innocent and wonderful until introduced to materialism; materialism is what corrupted them and it DEFINES US.
UnoRaza 2 years ago
Which Christians? And don't say all, because not all Christians believe the same. You talking orthodox or Mormons or what?
coachkr63 2 years ago
All Christians. Christianity is defined by Wikipedia as "a monotheistic religion based on the life and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth as presented in the New Testament." If you will pay attention c. 1:55 (and throughout the videos) you will see that the "Christians" have not actually based their religion on the teachings of this man.
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
god bless you
moniek187 2 years ago
Did you omit the explicit belief of MANY deities in the Hindu/Budhist/Taoist and ancient religions along with the lip service paid to 'false' gods in Judaism and Islam for any particular reason? Are they not included as Polytheistic in your definition because they include among their pantheon a Definite godhead who has absolute sovereignty? Although even their Sovereigns had multiple personalities, resembling this luciferian dichotomy you're talking about.
MJRNKR 2 years ago
Buddhism unequals Hinduism and Taoism, and belief unequals worship. You'll find the same "gods" deliberated on extensively in the Bible, and you will find the worship of them nowhere in Buddhism (that is, the Buddhist philosophy, which you have apparently confused with Brahmanism).
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
So, am I a rotten tree that bears good fruit or a good tree that bears wicked fruit? So despondent. Sorry, I got distracted.
MJRNKR 2 years ago
rotten tree, rotten fruit
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
You claim that you don't find the concept of "original sin" in other religions (specifically buddhism and taoism). Would you not consider Karma (simplified perhaps could be called innate bondage to this world due to some part of our nature) which is to be escaped by enlightenment of sorts as a correlative to the greater Sin? I agree that modern christians have no context for this and misunderstand it, but it is not new to christianity.
lokiraccoon 2 years ago
Karma = natural consequence. The idea of karma depends on merit (how much or how little karmic action a person engages in). It has nothing to do with sin.
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
The 2 views differ widely both within their own religious context and between each other depending on the interpretation of a given sect...
satori137 2 years ago
I am enjoying your thoughts. I would like to have dialogue with you, but am not a Youtube regular. Do you have a forum/can we directly speak via e-mail?
lokiraccoon 2 years ago
There is a forum on my web site.
libermundus (dot) org
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
You also indicated that the teaching of "original sin" is incorrect. Are you also saying that this teaching of "original sin" and the only way of salvation being through Jesus Christ found in Romans 5 is incorrect as well?
Thanks!
dschutte3 2 years ago
Read the passage carefully: "Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression..." (v. 14).
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
And what do you mean by that? Are you thinking in context with v. 12: "Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned-- " "All" means everyone. And what about v. 21: "so that, as sin reigned in death, even so grace would reign through righteousness to eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." Anyone with an honest evaluation can see that Romans 5 declares that all have sinned, and Jesus is the answer.
dschutte3 2 years ago
Unlike the notion you have presented (which is actually refuted in its own context, as I have demonstrated), there are numerous passages that I could evoke which clearly leave no room for interpretation but debunk the Luciferian doctrine of original sin. e.g., 1 John 3: 7-10: "Everyone having been born of Elohim does not sin, because His seed stays in him, and he is powerless to sin..."
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
What I think you fail to realize, and only because you haven't even watched the videos, is that the doctrine of original sin claims that we are sinful BY NATURE, which not only makes God the ultimate culprit for our privative actions, but also a malevolent deity for punishing people who never even had a chance to get "saved" (an IMPOSSIBLE feat according to the doctrine) because they were born in the wrong place and time or whatever.
"All HAVE sinned" unequals "all DO sin."
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
"...they are without excuse." (Rom. 1:20)
"If we say that we have no sin, we are deceiving ourselves and the truth is not in us." (1 John 1:8)
malakhhatzadik, "The Lord rebuke you!" (Jude 1:9)
While I certainly hope that you will soon allow God to use the intelligence He gave you for promoting truth, I am glad that the error and heresy you present can be clearly seen by others.
"Though they intended evil against You and devised a plot, they will not succeed." (Psalm 21:11)
Blessings!
dschutte3 2 years ago
"Baal rebuke you!"
"Blessings!"
I'm leaving this comment to show people the absurdity of your self-defeating passive-aggressive paradigm.
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
@malakhhatzadik,
This is interesting. I've often thought about Adam's sin and how it supposedly cursed the rest of us. If that is true then we're sinners by birth, i.e., original sin, and therefore it could be argued that we are not responsible for our sins. If this is true then your statement would be right, and YHWH would be responsible for our sin. This contradicts other scriptures to the contrary, so original sin cannot be true.
Greyswyndir 1 year ago
You stated that Jesus did not preach Himself as the "end-all", if you will, to salvation and eternal life. How then would you explain a passage such as John 14:6: "Jesus said to him, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me."
dschutte3 2 years ago
It's been answered in the videos.
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
And, in which video do you answer my question please? No, it is not reasonable for you to ask me to watch all 50. I intend to give you a fair hearing, and I originally had planned on watching all 50, but your answer to this question will inform me whether you are indeed seeking truth, and if it is worth my time to even continue. Thank you.
dschutte3 2 years ago
Give me a fair hearing? Oh, thank you, benevolent master.
Again, I have nothing to prove to you. You're the one seeking truth, not me. I don't lack what I have, and I don't throw pearls before swine. Watch them or don't watch them, but please don't pretend like your judgment matters.
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
At the same time, I was very concerned by what you presented about Jesus being the messenger vs. the message in the fourth video. Instead of making a concluding statement at this point, let me simply ask you something. Your answer will prove to me whether you are indeed seeking truth honestly, instead of subtly promoting human opinions, or your own cult, rather than literally interpreted Scripture.
dschutte3 2 years ago
No offense but I really don't feel like I have anything to prove to you or anyone else. Wisdom is justified in all her children.
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
Actually, you do. If you are not willing to be straightforward with people who ask you to clarify, you involunatarily prove that you are not being honest with yourself or others. I hope you can "prove" that indeed you are.
dschutte3 2 years ago
I have always spoken plainly and honestly and answered everyone who has made sincere inquiries. Clearly you are the one who has something to prove (your sincerity, by watching/listening and proving it against scripture/reason/truth).
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
Hello,
Thank you for your effort in sharing your perspectives in these videos.
Right now, I am at number 4 of 50. I have to say that you seem to have done a lot of research, and I have no doubt learned some helpful facts that are indisputable, such as the different cannons.
dschutte3 2 years ago
Comment removed
dschutte3 2 years ago
Thank you! finally someone else who has some logic! Anti Korean Christianity! I'm a Korean-American by the way.
SueJungle 2 years ago
I dont understand why your quoting jesus, if you believe him to be the antichrist. Or are you just using the term "jesus" so people know who your talking about?
vaderman27 2 years ago
For instructional purposes, yes. It's all thoroughly explained in the videos.
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
This is EXCELLENT. Thank you for this! You are helping me put the pieces together that I have been looking for for a long time. I knew about the demiurge and that Christians were Luciferians but I didn't know how or what happened to make it that way. I was raised "Christian" and I knew it didn't make sense and the more I looked for answers the more I was confused by the answers that I got.
spring1978ukma 2 years ago
Right. Yahshuah=Christ, Jesus=Antichrist worshiped by all the pseudo-Christian Luciferian/Athanasian sects. It's all in the videos.
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
He said Jesus, not Yahshuah.
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
The blind see, and the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, and the deaf hear, the dead rise up, and the gospel is preached to the poor. That is the coming of the kingdom, or rather in these saving works the kingdom is already there. By the overcoming and removal of misery, of need, of sickness, by these actual effects John is to see that the new time has arrived. James p. 86
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
And as it awaits men to die once, and after this the judgment, so also the Messiah, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, shall appear a second time, apart from sin, to those waiting for Him, unto deliverance. Hebrews 9:27-28
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
I think your view doesn't portray true Christianity. I can understand why because the "religion" takes on so many faces that one studing the religion can come many conclusions.
You mention the Gospel. Gospel means good news. So you can use gospel in front of any number of phrases.
The real Gospel of the Bible is that man is conceived in sin and as such must be judged. God loved his creation so much that he came as Jesus to provide an atonement of sin. We no longer fear God's judgement.
dansnod 2 years ago
There was only one gospel that was ever preached in the NT. That is the gospel of the kingdom of heaven. Know what the Bible says about the others?
I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. Gal 1
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
I'm sorry but your "gospel" is the Antigospel of the Antichrist, and you will surely not inherit the kingdom of heaven if you put your faith in it.
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
So, do you believe that Jesus is the Christ?
dansnod 2 years ago
Are you talking about Jesus or Yahshuah now? It makes all the difference, but the way you phrase the question makes you sound brainwashed, and by consequence, in need of the information in the videos.
To me this is not a matter of belief. It's a matter of fact. Obviously I don't worship Apollo or in some other way deny the Father and the Son, or that Yahshuah has come in the flesh by replacing him with an archetypal god-man. I think I've been pretty consistent on that position.
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
Ok, I guess the answer to your question is "yes" either way. The Antichrist is still a Christ... just the chief impostor of the real one on whom the teachings of Christianity were originally based, before the deceivers started spreading their false doctrines. The invention of Jesus constitutes the greatest identity theft ever.
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
Well, I did some research and can say with conviction that yes I'm talking about Yahshuah.
I have been out of work since Nov and have been depending on G_d to get by. Sorry if this is the wrong name. I ask G_d to give me wisdom and boy has he.
Listening to your first four videos is the first time I heard this information. I'm always open to hear differant ideas so the videos so far have been helpful.
Not sure I'll agree with all you have but I'll be looking into it.
dansnod 2 years ago
Another good one. I have, for a long time, believed that Original Sin is one of the greatest fallacy's included in the Doctrines of the Roman Catholic church. Simply another method of making people feel like they are bad and imperfect; therefore needing the "Church" to redeem themselves. A sound method of control, yet in a very bad way.
Onward I go.
JohnTheNewBaptist 2 years ago
Please... oh please talk to one of Jehovah's Witnesses. Everything that you are saying... they have been saying for decades.
media2view 2 years ago
In the first 4 videos, maybe. But I also don't condone belief in the doctrines of devils that they've been saying for decades, or subservience to any Satanic and/or Masonic institution which they've been promoting for decades. For instance, while Rastafarians do it because of ignorance, I regard it as an atrocity that the JWs would KNOWINGLY pervert the sacred name of the Most High and then go on telling the world that they alone possess truth. The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend.
malakhhatzadik 2 years ago
I have read a lot more than a couple of verses and that doesnt give me any authority to go around judging people and telling them "you're wrong, I'm right" I'm not god. Maybe that's part of the problem with christians.they go around telling the rest of the world what to do and how to do it. they love to pass judgement.They are the real sinners for behaving like they're gods because they think they know it all when in actuality they only know that one book which was just another book.
NOpidaMASinfo 2 years ago
:)
your love intent is felt my friend
ravenshalom 3 years ago
You've never been told anything malicious. I see. So Yahshuah and Yohannan and the apostles et al were all liars, the Bible is full of lies, and the Jews and Luciferians who have built the Church and filled your head with their Satanic doctrines are right about everything. Thanks for clearing that up. Cuz ya know... I was thinking I was doing people a favor by telling the truth here. I'll be sure to obey you now instead of God, and quit preaching.
Actually I'm just going to block you.
malakhhatzadik 3 years ago
If, on the other hand, your intent is merely to senselessly argue without acknowledging the fact that you've been lied to by malicious persons intent on subverting the truth of the revelations of Christ and the prophets/apostles... if you believe that truth is contrary to plain reason... then I would ask that you simply go about your business and let GOD by my judge. Even if you decide to persist in your error it'll still be for your own good not to strain out whatever you perceive as a gnat.
malakhhatzadik 3 years ago
"How is accepting Jesus as the savior and repenting in our sins Anti-Christian/Luciferean?"
You have demonstrated an adequate capacity to think, despite appearances. I'm sure that if you were to watch the videos instead wasting our time trolling them, you'd figure it out.
I'm not the one who has traded in the teachings of God for the teachings of men. Simply insinuating as much isn't going to make it so, much less refute the perfectly valid and indisputable proofs that have been laid out here.
malakhhatzadik 3 years ago
And your take on Mark 4 and 2 Peter 2...?
If you honestly believe that my intent is to pervert the word of God then you simply haven't been paying attention either to me or to the word. You are guilty of every accusation which God Almighty and his prophets have made against you in it, and which I've related in these videos. The fact that you hinge your entire paradigm on a purely Luciferian/Antichristian belief without even addressing the scriptural doctrines proves that and only that.
malakhhatzadik 3 years ago
For example (3 months ago):
When Yahshua said "No one comes to the Father except through me," that was in the context of "I am the way, the truth and the life." i.e. "No one comes to the Father except by way of the way, the truth and the life." The way, of course, is love... the way that he taught and exemplified.
Maybe it's not so explicit as you imagined it. If you can't accept that then I wonder what your take on Mark 4:11-12 and 2 Peter 2:1-3 is.
malakhhatzadik 3 years ago
Not only have I adequately addressed this IN ITS CONTEXT in the videos and pointed out that it's the only thing that pseudo-Christians even have to fall back on when their devilish doctrines are exposed, but I've also addressed it about a dozen times in the comments.
I've tried to educate you, but you have to do your part if you want to know the truth.
malakhhatzadik 3 years ago
You earned some credits for mentioning the difference between the Vulgate and the Alexandrian canon, but by now you don't see any difference between a god of wood that's being sold at a discount store and between the true God?
Everytime I'm in such a store, I have the tendency to crush them all and I even like to pay for it.
gebakk 3 years ago
I'm not here to earn points. I'm here to tell the truth, and if need be, to educate you. By the sound of it, you are malicious toward what you have not yet understood (evidenced by your complete misinterpretation of my position on "a god of wood"), and this is undoubtedly the cause for your ignorance. I've addressed the issue of idolatry very succinctly. Should you choose to continue and listen to what I'm saying without your "I even like to pay for it" spin on it, I'm sure you'll agree with me.
malakhhatzadik 3 years ago
Anyway I doubt you approach a false (cruciform) depiction of the pagan sun god Jesus the same way when you're in Christian book store. Am I right? At least Buddhists aren't idol-worshipers since a Buddha figurine represents the Buddha/Christ ideal rather than any particular god, and is therefore not a subject of veneration...though others (Brahmanic Buddhists, Hindus), rejecting the ideal in favor of symbolic religion, do treat them differently...
malakhhatzadik 3 years ago
I just started to watch your vids, at least I will spend some more time on it due to your comments. Interesting to see that christians, muslims are not the only one divided amongst themselves: Buddhists also do.
gebakk 3 years ago
Here in the West the only thing you're likely to even see is Mahayana/Tibetan Buddhism, which is only one of dozens of schools of thought, and certainly the most fallacious when it comes to ecumenicism and superstition. It's not hard to find pictures on the Internet of the Dalai Lama shaking hands with the pope. Zen and Amitabha, etc., on the other hand, are completely abstract and not at all religious, since Buddhism is at the core a way of thinking or a way of life. Glad you're going to watch.
malakhhatzadik 3 years ago
The problem is not with which god/gods one worships, but with symbolic religion in general. The symbols and the expressions of an inward faith are given to all, but true understanding and true piety are the portion of the few--those few being those who have a spiritual interpretation of them, not just a "I hate what I see if it doesn't conform to what I expect to see of the divine based on my own cultural influences and limited understanding" mentality. See my other playlist (Luciferian Agenda).
malakhhatzadik 3 years ago
What about "The kingdom of heaven is within?"
WordsofHarmony 3 years ago
What about it? These videos were posted 9 months ago. Be specific.
malakhhatzadik 3 years ago
When you speak of Dualism are you talking about moral dualism?
"Moral dualism is the belief of the coexistence (in eastern and naturalistic religions) or conflict (in western religions) between the "benevolent" and the "malignant". Most religious systems have some form of moral dualism - in western religions, for instance, a conflict between good and evil."
SuchAsTheIraq 3 years ago
No, not moral... metaphysical. All moral systems are derived from metaphysical systems. In order to believe in "evil" you have to believe that it has been derived from somewhere (i.e. that God is evil, or culpable in its creation... which isn't even a problem if you don't believe in its existence).
malakhhatzadik 3 years ago
I am an enemy in the eyes of haters, but in my own eyes, I have no enemies.
ebedelohim 3 years ago
A question for Christians/Jews:
a number of verses in the Bible (eg. Ps. 7:9, Rev. 2:23) state that God searches out and inspects the kidneys, or "reins", of humans. Similarly, the Talmud (Berakhoth 61.a) states that one of the two kidneys counsels what is good, and the other evil.
why does God inspect the kidneys?
shortcircuit12 3 years ago
Kidneys? How do you get "kidneys" out of "hearts and minds"? I don't think you're asking a serious question, therefore you don't deserve a serious answer. Correct me if I'm mistaken.
malakhhatzadik 3 years ago
ISV, NASV, Word English Bible: minds and hearts
God's Word: hearts and minds
Bible in Basic English: secret thoughts and hearts
Weymouth: inmost thoughts
Wesley: The desires. And hearts - Thoughts
malakhhatzadik 3 years ago
Another question:
Deute 14.8 (the bible); "Also the swine (pig) is unclean for you, because it has cloven hooves, yet does not chew the cud; you shall not eat their flesh or touch their dead carcasses."
Why do christians eat pig meat then?
shortcircuit12 3 years ago
check leviticus 11:7(from american standard bible, I would say that this translation would be quite reliable); it clearly says that pig meat is not to be eaten.
shortcircuit12 3 years ago
You haven't even addressed my answer before moving on to the next question. Is it not a valid question? If you don't think so, why not? Seems like you've got a hit-and-run agenda here, seeing as how you posted the "kidney" question 6 times on 2 videos. Where I come from that's called trolling.
A horse sires a horse, a man begets man, a god brings forth a god. No Jew has ever begotten a Christian as long as the earth has existed. We as a people are not descended from the Jews. -Gospel of Philip
malakhhatzadik 3 years ago
I have a quetion, you say that jesus never says that you must be saved through him, but he does say none can see the father less they go through him. Make me understand your insight please? im not being malicious, i just would like to understand your belieifs better.
artlife20 3 years ago
When Yahshua said "No one comes to the Father except through me," that was in the context of "I am the way, the truth and the life." i.e. "No one comes to the Father except by way of the way, the truth and the life." The way, of course, is love... the way that he taught and exemplified.
malakhhatzadik 3 years ago
KJV, NAV: reins
wikipedia disambiguation of reins states that it is an archaic word for kidneys, which in the ancient world where thought to be the seat of ones conscience. no controversy here as I see it.
ac7933 3 years ago
why does it say "no one is good, no not one but God"
faithm 3 years ago
The spirit vs. ego or material form dichotomy is an essential characteristic of the Gnostic/Vedanta/Buddhist religions.
malakhhatzadik 3 years ago
i cant tell what you are but god is love and yes a spirit. john wrote "in the beinging was the word and the word was with god, and the word was god" and he came to his own and they receieved him not.
theblacksun8 3 years ago
'thy kingdom come it will be done on earth as it is in heaven' earth will become heaven i guess?
raulitech 3 years ago
Think of heaven in this context (and anywhere you see "the kingdom of heaven" or, as my Bible says, the "reign of the heavens") as a sort of interstellar civilization. Right now it's more like a colony than a full member. The purpose of our present trial is to determine who gets put where in the planet's administrative hierarchy.
malakhhatzadik 3 years ago
I say this in reflection of what you just said regarding my comments to " doubleaamazin "
no mater how many excellent deeds you may have performed for a thousand eons,such as generosity or making offerings to the Buddhas,
They all perish in one fit of anger. MASTER SHANTIDEVA
Quandary121 3 years ago
Just a thought there are many kinds of Buddhism "THERAVADIN"."MAHAYANA/TANTRIC"."ZEN/JAPANESE/KOREAN"."PURE LAND/CHINESE/JAPANESE" which of these would you say is the one that you pratice or follow ?
Quandary121 3 years ago
Me personally? Theravada. But "pure land" or Amitabha is probably the "best." Mahayana is dualist, and therefore not much better than mainstream Christianity. Also, all Eastern religions except Hinduism are strongly influenced by Buddhism, just like all Western religions except Wicca are influenced by Christianity.
malakhhatzadik 3 years ago
Is this because of your great love of "THAILAND". And have you been influenced by work of ajahn chah? as many western followers have?
Quandary121 3 years ago
Depending on how you look at it, you could say that my appreciation for the Theravada tradition is a direct result of my love for the Thai culture, or that my love for Thai culture is a direct result of their keeping the Theravada tradition. I have just as much respect for the Lao and Khmer cultures. My affinity with Buddhism comes from the fact that it is natural (as opposed to manmade) religion, if it is indeed religion at all.
malakhhatzadik 3 years ago
Thanks enough said !! and well put
Quandary121 3 years ago
THE EIGHTFOLD NOBLE PATH incorporates Right View,Right Intenttion,Right Speech,Right Action,Right Livlihood,Right Effort,Right Mindfulness and Right cConcentration
There is nothing to trust in seeking happiness from outside;you will only become exhausted from suffering,which is without satisfaction and without end. LAMA ZOPA RINPOCHE
Quandary121 3 years ago
As far a i understand buddisim means "THE EMPTY MIND" some of us are far more advanced in this like " doubleaamazin " for instance hahahahaaha
Quandary121 3 years ago
I've already blocked him. No need to be so hostile. A kind word turns away wrath.
There are, I believe, no less than a dozen words in Pali that translate to English as "mind," so don't base your whole understanding on that. Buddhism is entirely rational and objective. For Buddhists, the goal of meditation is not to empty the mind (that's just the means) but rather to achieve a state of mindfulness.
malakhhatzadik 3 years ago
fair enough i will adjust my comments accordingly your right i should not be so hostile ,i do have a book on Buddhism and find it very refreshing
IF YOU WANT TO KNOW YOUR PAST LIFE,LOOK INTO YOUR PRESENT CONDITION;IF YOU WANT TO KNOW YOUR FUTURE LIFE,LOOK AT YOUR PRESENT ACTIONS PADMASAMBBAVA
Quandary121 3 years ago
Just remember to be specific on what you are condemning Christianity is not evil it is the perversion of the Gospel that is the cause of all the problems. Christianity is not wrong. Religion is wrong.
B0thergirl 3 years ago
Okay, I will shut up until I watch all the videos. Sometimes I feel you are bashing Christianity but you really are bashing religion which Jesus also did. So I will not respond again until I have watched entire compilation.
B0thergirl 3 years ago
It is nice to be understood. My focus is on Christianity right now simply because I get a lot of questions about it, and because it is so widely practiced, and yet there is enough truth to it for it to be salvageable. If I have the time I'll be posting similar videos on Atheism and Islam, etc.
I will be eagerly anticipating your comments after you have finished. :-) P+L
malakhhatzadik 3 years ago
1st John 3:4 Whosoever commiteth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.
doubleaamazin 3 years ago
oh look your back again with your nonesensical comments why do you feel the need to comment as you and all the rest of us know that your just pissed of about no one believing you about what you say about religion have you come here to learn or just to make yourself look even more stupid
2 Chronicles 13:7
Some worthless scoundrels gathered around him and opposed Rehoboam son of Solomon when he was young and indecisive and not strong enough to resist them
Quandary121 3 years ago