YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

couldn't agree more! :)

Trying to invent a reason for everything doesn'T make it real.

GaruzoSama 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos

This has been flagged as spam show

ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions tons of Earth soil)

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but it's irrational to believe that mere undirected natural laws can bring about either. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!

Mogley52 5 months ago

This has been flagged as spam show

DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless.

Mogley52 5 months ago

Atheists believe this is as good as it's gonna get, pretty much. That's just depressing, even if I grew up knowing zero information regarding religion or theism.

TubeS0UP 9 months ago

@TubeS0UP It is what it is. Depressing or not, reality is not determined by what you think of it. If this is as good as it gets at least I know to make the most of it. I am not wishing my life away hoping for something unseen.

imaginenoreligion 9 months ago

@imaginenoreligion By all means if you are TRULY happy, who should attempt to persuade you. To say someone exercising faith and spreading good work or deeds is 'wishing away' and 'hoping for the unseen' is not entirely accurate :þ Would you agree that work and lives, in general, of current believers are a definite factor in why non believers are deterred? People tend to point fingers at everyone else whenever they question something. S/he is/not doing that, why should/not I? Muddled up innit?

TubeS0UP 9 months ago

@TubeS0UP Good works or deeds are not the monopoly of those with faith, and have no bearing on what is or is not real. The faithless can be as passionate, less passionate, or more passionate about helping others.

This is as good as it gets, so enjoy the ride, and soak it up.

imaginenoreligion 9 months ago

Wow. Why did you bother answering? The answers made less sense than the questions. To be fair, Christians get some pathetic questions too "Why didn't God kill Hitler? Why doesn't God heal everyone? Who made God? Mmmm... not worth answering. Your answer about right and wrong is so far wide of the mark, yet a typical atheistic position. If you think right and wrong depends on whether it hurts others then how can you teach a child that it's wrong to lie if it hurts no one?

foveostag 10 months ago

@foveostag It's not wrong to lie if it hurts no-one. Should Anne Frank have been handed over to the Nazis when German officers were searching the building she was hiding in? No! Lying was clearly the moral choice in this situation.

It can be moral to lie in certain situations, My answers make sense. Screw your head on.

imaginenoreligion 10 months ago

G'day from Down Under! I really enjoyed watching your video "10 Crappy Questions Every Atheist Must Answer." What I related to most was your sense of frustration & almost speechlessness that people can hold beliefs that appear so absurd. I was chatting with an acquaintance recently who believes in a religion called "Attractionism." It is seriously bizarre! I asked questions, but didn't bother to try to rationalize with her, because her mind was so closed. Discussion with her was futile.

moonlightpegasus 1 year ago

Would long time no see be a bit of an understatement? Those were crappy questions.

TheNakedAtheist 1 year ago

@TheNakedAtheist well over a year, and yes they were poorly thought out questions.

imaginenoreligion 1 year ago

"If there's no god, then why is there anything at all?" The universe formed naturally, like everything else we see. Just because the mechanism of that formation isn't yet known doesn't give right to the questioner to put whatever fairy tale most appeals to them in that gap of knowledge.

LordSlag 1 year ago

@LordSlag

i think he knows...

TRAdamTM 1 year ago

@TRAdamTM He didn't say so.

LordSlag 1 year ago

@LordSlag Agree 100%

imaginenoreligion 1 year ago

@imaginenoreligion TYVM, sir. I ask that you watch my featured video and participate to help support the advancement of science.

LordSlag 1 year ago

Link to this comment:

All Comments (33)