And yet, we can see, we can visualize the ethereal matter. The scheme to one device for to visualize the ethereal matter: EXIST! And this device it can realize!
The matter of the our terrestrial globe has four states of aggregation: solid, liquid, gseous and ethereal and not three after official science. The matter on which we see it, proceed from the ethereal matter, which from cancentration in concentration it had constituted in the electrons, in protons respectivel;y in the atoms of the chemical elements which had overtaken at the gaseous, liquid and solid state. All the matter on which we see it, is condensed ether.
The PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL MATTER is the visible matter with free eye and is constituted from atoms of the chemical elements. The PHYSICAL-ETHEREAL MATTER is a matter with atoms more small with 7..8 order of dimension than the atoms of chemical elements, and the bodies formed from this matter are invisible for the human eye. The ETHEREAL PHYSICS it occupy with the study of the ethereal matters, but which was abandoned in the XX century, because in 1905 A.Einstein excludes the ether
• SandustanBrasov But the ETHER is a physical reality constituted from a very small matter, invisible for human eye, and is formed from atoms more small with 7...8 order of dimension than the atoms of the chemical elements. The matter of the ether penetrate in all the visible bodies and is the physical matter which fills both the interplanetary space and the interatomic space. The ether is a matter with mass and weigth, being subdued and she the action of the universal attraction law.
The notion of dark matter and dark energy proceed from theoretical physics, from relativity theory of the A. Einstein, from the mistaken interpretation of the physical reality. Something exist indeed: and matter and energy; but is the much ethereal matter and the her energys from the her frame. Dark energy and cosmic acceleration are a failure of relativity of the Einstein.
• SandustanBrasov In 1905, A.Einstein conclude that the ether hasn't a correspondent in reality and constitute not a medium which let can serve as reference system. Thus Einstein renounced to the ether notion and absolute space and emits the two restricted relativity principles. By it content the second principle excludes the ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement - the light speed - and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality.
The last Space Shuttle came home March 9, 2011 This is the cosmic countdown to the end of the calender which brings an end and new beginning to social, political. economic and geological cycles for the world. The ancient Maya describe the end of their calendar, the Tortugero Monument 6. At that time the 9-step entity Bolon Yootke will "descend". That was Ash Wednesday this year. Wonder why the shuttle was up at this time.?
@Helge129 I would be more inclined to say its existence has been solidly established, but that we don't know exactly what it is. We can see it clearly. Even make accurate maps of it. But via gravity, which is a perfectly valid way of detecting things. It was a fallacy for us to start out assuming that everything in space must interact via EM. It was never a valid assumption. One might as well say that our galactic center is hypothesis since we can't see it in visible light, but only in IR.
@Helge129 Uh... I think we've crossed wires here. It was SandustanBrasov going on about 'ethereal' matter, etc. I'm just elaborating on what we do & don't know about DM. People get the impression that we're totally clueless about it, in part because Neil deGrasse Tyson & others seemingly go out of their way to give the public that impression, rather than explaining what we do know, what we don't know, and what we think might be true, but are not certain of. BTW, my bet's on the neutralino. ;-)
hubble a great tool. some comments here are a bit harsh (commit suicide), settle down. I have loved astronomy for as long as i can remember. I could watch docos for days, love information. NASA dosent hide info, they shouldnt but yes they do.
I love your vids but as i said you in another comment, it would be amazing if you make avaliable some english subtitles in order to people who can't understant english very well, can also be benefited. This is just a suggestion. Thanks for share! ;)
I am not an expert by any means but what I learned about gravity is that e+mc2 was about light bending because of the gravitational pull of the sun and Einstein came up withthis of course and they had to wait for a eclipse to prove that light will bend with enough gravity pull if this is wrong please let me know. As far as the distortion of the object that for the insight, I was just guessing about the fact that there might be a type of magnet force that would make these distortions. Thanks
i learn lots from your videos tony, you explain this extreamly well , i aim to become an astronomer when im older because astronomy is the subject that i enjoy the most, and that interests me the most. I live in England and in school we never learn astronomy so you, books and others like you are the only people i can learn from. So please keep up the fantastic work!
Does this prove e+mc2 is totally proven or is there more to find out. Does the black hole do the distortion or does gravite do the distortion ? Before this formula they thought light couldn't bend . What does the bending, black hole or gravity in the black hole, or a collection of gravitatition pull or actually a hole is there,or magnetic gavitatition pull or just a hole that lead to somewhere unknown.
@tchidell123 The video mentions dark matter and not a black hole, although the effect would be similar. Gravity does not directly affect light, but what gravity does is, it distorts or bend the space around it the object. When light passes through the distorted space it bends and therefore the galaxy behind the massive object appears in the wrong place. First proof of this came during a total eclipse of the sun when stars that were behind the sun were visible due beside the eclipse.
When astronomers in the 1950s realized that the universe was expanding, they 'reversed the film', back to the original object that exploded in the Big Bang. But all that was based on the universe that was understood in the 1950's, a universe that didn't include Dark Energy or Dark Matter. What happens to those Big Bang calculations now that we know we were only dealing with 10% of the universe?
@luigisk8er That's what most astrophysicists are implying, though they haven't got around to dealing with it yet. The astronomical revolution of the 1990's is far greater than the 1610 revolution started by Galileo.
Gravitation may not be Universal, as in the same strength in all times and all places.
I hate constellations as a way of identifying location of stars. I could never learn to recognise them. I guess it takes a lot of imagination to see the shapes.
I would like it much more if we used a space grid of some kind with less curves than the constellations.
All of the constellations shown in this video are bullshit, they don't match the stars at all and are just plopped on the screen for no reason. Real constellations line up with the stars, not a low opacity jpeg slapped on a picture of space.
Tony should watch Knights of the Zodiac anime series, is really cool and astronomical. By the way I bet Tony will like to listen to Luca Turilli and Rhapsody Of Fire bands.
If were going to be skeptical about everything, because that is what good scientists do, should we really accept this Dark Matter so swiftly. I mean Einstein showed Newton's flaws. How do we know for sure. I bet their correct though, this is stuff beyond what I know. Hell, I don't have a PHD in astro-phsyics.
Thanks for an excellent video! But is it possible that electric or magnetic fields in space could be responsible not only for the "gravitational lensing" effects, but also for holding together these galactic clusters?
No, EM fields have no mass so they could not be responsible for holding galaxies together.
Mass attracts mass. Since the photon has no mass, gravitational lensing is what bends light around planets and stars, and any other object with sufficent mass.
I should clarify that because mass distorts space time (evidence by super massive objects like black holes) that this is why light is bent around masses.
I see my info about the moon hoax got marked as spam. I guess they don't want people to see it. Here it is again.
Google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon?". The summary is on page 15. It's the 7th post from the top.
I just went through that thread and I must say, I am not impressed. You write a bunch of long posts with a lot of links but ultimately, you seem to be operating on the assumption that quantity makes up for quality. It does not.
Your arguments are pretty bad. If anyone tried to prove anything but your chosen pet theory using the same logic that you do, you'd think they're nuts, just as the people at Naked Scientist think you are.
There's a mountain of evidence that the Apollo moon missions were faked. I posted a partial summary of it on a science forum. Google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon?". The summary is on page 15. It's the 7th post from the top.
People who still think they went to the moon simply haven't seen the hoax evidence yet.
I've seen the "evidence" for the so-called hoax and frankly it is retarded. Conspiracy theorists lack critical thinking skills. UFO nuts, the 9/11 truthers, the anti-vaccine mob, Apollo 11 hoaxers . . . They're all the same. To believe in any of this crap requires scientific illiteracy and an oblivious detachment from reality.
No one who actually looks at it will agree with you . You seem to be trying to sway people who haven't seen the evidence that they faked the moon landings.
I'm trying to sway people away from embarrassing themselves. The only people who think it was a hoax are paranoid people who think that everything from "Big Pharma" to Reptilians are out to get them, and are willing to use blurry photos, bizarre logic and shameful ignorance of the facts to justify their preset belief.
It is not "closed minded" to base judgments on evidence and rationality instead of the wish fulfillment of paranoid fantasies. "Leaders" have nothing whatsoever to do with it. Just because you believe in a far fetched and frankly illogical conspiracy theory does not make you a rebel, nor does it make you intelligent, educated or thoughtful.
You are missing the point, it isn't about being intelligent, educated, or thoughtful. It's about searching for truth, you care too much about who your views make you, instead of what they mean. You are refuting arguments that you haven't heard yet, and are trying to insult me and others personally in order to stray the conversation away from the actual argument. It isn't about who's smarter my friend, it may be you or me, but it doesn't matter.
I have heard all the arguments. They are scientifically illiterate and logically nonsensical. Like I said, it is not "open-minded" to be fence-sitter when it comes to the ridiculous.
And I "care too much about who my views make me instead of what they mean"? What? Look, I'm sure you get off on sounding insightful but apparently you're not very good at reading people.
Yes, they are scientifically illiterate when formulated by many scientist and engineers. I am curious, what theories have you actually read about? not heard or seen, read.
I'm not reading you, im just interpreting what you said, "Just because you believe in a far fetched and frankly illogical conspiracy theory does not make you a rebel, nor does it make you intelligent, educated or thoughtful." to me, and correct me if im wrong, it sounds like you're focusing on qualities, not the arguments
You were the one who accused me of being "closed minded" for rejecting this conspiracy theory. If anyone was focusing on "qualities," obviously it was you.
The conspiracy theory that the Apollo moon landings were a hoax are not formulated by actual scientists and engineers, and any who do are a fringe minority like psychologists who think Freudian psychoanalysis is valid, or biologists who are creationists - no one can take them seriously, and for good reason.
I'll i meant was question before accepting what you believe, just don't follow blindly.
Of course the conspiracy theory that the Apollo moon landings were a hoax is invalid and does not contain any sufficient data to back it up. I was not referring to that theory.
"They're all the same. To believe in any of this crap requires scientific illiteracy and an oblivious detachment from reality." this was in reference to all conspiracy theorists in general
hey so i just recently heard from someone that original pictures taken by hubbel of certain images are not as vivid as reported , certain images such as the cat's eye nebula can anyone confirm or disprove this cuz i dont believe it, i believe our telescopes are advanced enough to see the colors and spectrums of light that particles and elements make in certain vibrantly colored nebulas and formations
The detectors of Hubble can only see black and white. However, by measuring the same object 3 times, each time with a different colour filter, we can get 3 different "coloured" images. The images are then processed off-line and they result in the great pictures that are presented.
when they take a picture of a nebulae there is actually no color in the gas itself. Its clear gas but its is several different kinds of gas. They use certain filters or instruments to detect the gases. For example red might be Hydrogen while blue might be Oxygen and green Nitrogen..... I don't know the actual color schemes but because of this it is almost definitely computer enhanced.
a picture of the nebulae without any computer filter would be blank sky
Politicians and journalists lie more often than NASA ever will or could, you retarded assholes! Leave NASA alone and fuck off with your conspiracy theories! Do something useful, like commit suicide - in fact, while you're at it, take the politicians and journalists with you. Tell them God told you to do it - collective suicide. Get the bankers, the Mafia, and religious people to join, too. All they do is fuck everybody else up -including themselves, actually.
@ZeHoSmusician Hey man! you should seriously look upon your comments . IYou may sit sometime alone where there is no body. and think about your creation and its purpose . iam sure that you would most likely found the truth and thats the Presence of one and only GOD, ALLAH. The you would also recognize the truthness of all the Prophets including the last Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him). And this recognition is the key for entering a paradise on the Final day of judgement & its succes
@ZeHoSmusician Hey man! you should seriously look upon your comments . IYou may sit sometime alone where there is no body. and think about your creation and its purpose . iam sure that you would most likely find the truth and thats the Presence of one and only GOD, ALLAH. The you would also recognize the truthness of all the Prophets including the last Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him). And this recognition is the key for entering a paradise on the Final day of judgement & its success
@ZeHoSmusician Hey man! you should seriously look upon your comments . You may sit sometime alone where there is no body. and think about your creation and its purpose . iam sure that you would most likely find the truth and thats the Presence of one and only GOD, ALLAH. The you would also recognize the truthness of all the Prophets including the last Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him). And this recognition is the key for entering a paradise on the Final day of judgement & its success
do they release single lensing picture of region or multiple scans ? because single i kno they usually just show picture for press release but it is there any with minimal editing which will interest me more because oddly enough i can duplicate lensing effect in using a photo editor
Great job! That was very well done. The zodiac overlays gave an eerie feel to it. Like linking ancient mythology to the latest in technology! ha that rhymed! Awesome vid!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
well,first of all they wont admit theres 'ufos' out there and alot of their footage shows it.2nd what they are realy doing on other planets.nasa would be great if they were honest about things,i know i would donate money[what little i have]to them.take a look at some of there pics and notice how heavely edited they are,why?what dont they want us to see and why?they say only rocks are out there but we see black spots cover up somethings.also google earth,look at the moon and you can tell here to.
Sorry, but I have no time for conspiracy theorists, especially for something that's been repeatedly debunked. There are no UFOs on NASA's photos. Good bye.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
keep youre mind close,eyes closed then.i have seen 1 real space craft,not only are you calling me a lair but 1/3 of the earths population a lair also.and yes they are photos,even videos!do some research before pulling the lair card out.and as far as being 'debunked' lol.how can you debunke something that 'doesnt exist'.so you might ought to make time to search this out,unless you dont want to 'know'.
I can't help but wonder how many more "final mission"s NASA will send to Hubble. I truly hope many more. Although future space-based platforms are in the works, they are mostly plans for radio telescopes. Nothing compares to the beauty of a good old-fashioned optical telescope.
That picture of that streched out galaxy is one of the most interesting I've seen in... ever.
What I was wondering, is dark matter/energy three dimensional or what? As someone less-than-an-amateur I am completely clueless. Can you collide with it for example?
1. doesn't dark matter force everything in the universe away? 2. you always find the right music. 3. thanks for posting another awesome educating video.
Incredible! This would be fantastic for trying to convey to somebody who hasn't really thought about this kind of stuff much just how enormous and magnificent space is.
I know this may be a big ask, but could you do a non-speech video with the animations and pictures in sequence. I'm amazed by the way you've explained all this, but my friends would probably get bored and are much more likely to just want to see the pretty things and an overlay of text to explain what's going on.
(could use the final animation of the light in HST to segue into the images)
The background music works very well, as always, to create a great mood :) I love these
Unbelievable. Your videos never cease to leave me in awe. Thank you for these videos. I play them for my kids, their friends, friends of ours, basically anyone I can convince to look at my screen for 5 minutes, and the reaction is always the same. Awe and amazement.
Love your vids...Always loved astronomy..tho I never felt smart enough to actually "do it"...I was never good in math....I love space tho,it intrigues me..and needless to say..I am a Trekkie...are you a Trak fan, and do you beleive in Life on other worlds..at this very moment..light years away? I do.
Yes I think there are life on other worlds, right now. In fact, I think we are on the verge of an inflection point, where we will soon discover not just one new civilization, but many.
Yes, I agree. Mass would have been the better term, sometimes I try to say things a little too simplistically. I need to pick it up a notch for you space fans!
Awesome! Thanks a lot for yet another great video! I'm really looking forward seeing more of your videos. Maybe something where you explain things like the pictures seen in this video and dark matter in more detail.
Cool... I feel smart for actually knowing what gravitational lensing was before the video. Are there any examples of it in the Hubble Deep Field photo? I could of sworn I seen some.
wicked cool....thanks for the vid, it is wonderful as always. Hope all goes well for you and your research...peace be with and looking forward to your next contribution
I'm going invent make believe thens too like I'm rich and have Ferrari
Thedevontree 3 weeks ago
Dark matter what a crock
Thedevontree 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
free education for all!
boogiebuddy01 2 months ago
SandustanBrasov
And yet, we can see, we can visualize the ethereal matter. The scheme to one device for to visualize the ethereal matter: EXIST! And this device it can realize!
My e-mail: s.stan65@yahoo.com
You Tube: sandustanBrasov’s Channel
sandustanBrasov 6 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The matter of the our terrestrial globe has four states of aggregation: solid, liquid, gseous and ethereal and not three after official science. The matter on which we see it, proceed from the ethereal matter, which from cancentration in concentration it had constituted in the electrons, in protons respectivel;y in the atoms of the chemical elements which had overtaken at the gaseous, liquid and solid state. All the matter on which we see it, is condensed ether.
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
@sandustanBrasov you are part right: There are 4 states, but ethereal isn't one of them, the 4th state is Plasma.
Helge129 6 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL MATTER is the visible matter with free eye and is constituted from atoms of the chemical elements. The PHYSICAL-ETHEREAL MATTER is a matter with atoms more small with 7..8 order of dimension than the atoms of chemical elements, and the bodies formed from this matter are invisible for the human eye. The ETHEREAL PHYSICS it occupy with the study of the ethereal matters, but which was abandoned in the XX century, because in 1905 A.Einstein excludes the ether
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
• SandustanBrasov But the ETHER is a physical reality constituted from a very small matter, invisible for human eye, and is formed from atoms more small with 7...8 order of dimension than the atoms of the chemical elements. The matter of the ether penetrate in all the visible bodies and is the physical matter which fills both the interplanetary space and the interatomic space. The ether is a matter with mass and weigth, being subdued and she the action of the universal attraction law.
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The notion of dark matter and dark energy proceed from theoretical physics, from relativity theory of the A. Einstein, from the mistaken interpretation of the physical reality. Something exist indeed: and matter and energy; but is the much ethereal matter and the her energys from the her frame. Dark energy and cosmic acceleration are a failure of relativity of the Einstein.
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
• SandustanBrasov In 1905, A.Einstein conclude that the ether hasn't a correspondent in reality and constitute not a medium which let can serve as reference system. Thus Einstein renounced to the ether notion and absolute space and emits the two restricted relativity principles. By it content the second principle excludes the ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement - the light speed - and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality.
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
2:10 looks like a heart...
MrPotatoheadd 7 months ago
The last Space Shuttle came home March 9, 2011 This is the cosmic countdown to the end of the calender which brings an end and new beginning to social, political. economic and geological cycles for the world. The ancient Maya describe the end of their calendar, the Tortugero Monument 6. At that time the 9-step entity Bolon Yootke will "descend". That was Ash Wednesday this year. Wonder why the shuttle was up at this time.?
isabelleofshreveport 8 months ago
Dark matter has not yet been proven to exist...yet it holds galaxies together by its gravity? good work!!
dee2706 10 months ago
@dee2706 Dark Matter is just a hypothesis currently, but it's, as far as I know, the only one that 'works' properly.
Helge129 9 months ago
@Helge129 I would be more inclined to say its existence has been solidly established, but that we don't know exactly what it is. We can see it clearly. Even make accurate maps of it. But via gravity, which is a perfectly valid way of detecting things. It was a fallacy for us to start out assuming that everything in space must interact via EM. It was never a valid assumption. One might as well say that our galactic center is hypothesis since we can't see it in visible light, but only in IR.
sbergman27 4 months ago
@sbergman27 ethereal is still not a state of matter...it doesn't exist.
What you are reffering to is called Dark Matter, a whole new kind of matter.
Helge129 4 months ago
@Helge129 Uh... I think we've crossed wires here. It was SandustanBrasov going on about 'ethereal' matter, etc. I'm just elaborating on what we do & don't know about DM. People get the impression that we're totally clueless about it, in part because Neil deGrasse Tyson & others seemingly go out of their way to give the public that impression, rather than explaining what we do know, what we don't know, and what we think might be true, but are not certain of. BTW, my bet's on the neutralino. ;-)
sbergman27 4 months ago
@dee2706 on't they call it dark matter because they don't know what it is? basically they're trying to figure out what it is
Atheist603 8 months ago
@Atheist603 They call it dark because they can't see it because it doesn't reflect electromagnetic waves.
Helge129 8 months ago
Music sounds like Mass Effect.
OsanBlackCat5RS 11 months ago
hubble a great tool. some comments here are a bit harsh (commit suicide), settle down. I have loved astronomy for as long as i can remember. I could watch docos for days, love information. NASA dosent hide info, they shouldnt but yes they do.
me001ist 1 year ago
I love your vids but as i said you in another comment, it would be amazing if you make avaliable some english subtitles in order to people who can't understant english very well, can also be benefited. This is just a suggestion. Thanks for share! ;)
Kayome 1 year ago
keep looking up./..star hichhikers guide to the universe? something like that..lol
great vid...thanks for posting!
232323C 1 year ago
I am not an expert by any means but what I learned about gravity is that e+mc2 was about light bending because of the gravitational pull of the sun and Einstein came up withthis of course and they had to wait for a eclipse to prove that light will bend with enough gravity pull if this is wrong please let me know. As far as the distortion of the object that for the insight, I was just guessing about the fact that there might be a type of magnet force that would make these distortions. Thanks
tchidell123 1 year ago
you are an awesome awesome man..
alfonzie 1 year ago
i learn lots from your videos tony, you explain this extreamly well , i aim to become an astronomer when im older because astronomy is the subject that i enjoy the most, and that interests me the most. I live in England and in school we never learn astronomy so you, books and others like you are the only people i can learn from. So please keep up the fantastic work!
divenutslincoln 1 year ago
Does this prove e+mc2 is totally proven or is there more to find out. Does the black hole do the distortion or does gravite do the distortion ? Before this formula they thought light couldn't bend . What does the bending, black hole or gravity in the black hole, or a collection of gravitatition pull or actually a hole is there,or magnetic gavitatition pull or just a hole that lead to somewhere unknown.
tchidell123 1 year ago
@tchidell123 The video mentions dark matter and not a black hole, although the effect would be similar. Gravity does not directly affect light, but what gravity does is, it distorts or bend the space around it the object. When light passes through the distorted space it bends and therefore the galaxy behind the massive object appears in the wrong place. First proof of this came during a total eclipse of the sun when stars that were behind the sun were visible due beside the eclipse.
AbuserTube 1 year ago
Love the music love your videos
cdinsky 1 year ago
This isn't new though, we've known about the contribution of dark matter to gravitational lensing for ages.
Richy15251 1 year ago
Videos like this make me want to go to grad school for a degree in Astrophysics.
vigcs 1 year ago
music is crap it makes me wanna turn my volume down
azeivio 1 year ago
|stream episodes [dot] net| - Watch all the current tv shows and movies that youtube refuses to allow!
Improved Hubble Shows Evidence of Dark Matter
stevewallace20 1 year ago
When astronomers in the 1950s realized that the universe was expanding, they 'reversed the film', back to the original object that exploded in the Big Bang. But all that was based on the universe that was understood in the 1950's, a universe that didn't include Dark Energy or Dark Matter. What happens to those Big Bang calculations now that we know we were only dealing with 10% of the universe?
geezzerboy 1 year ago
@geezzerboy wait.... so what we thought was the whole universe is just 10%???!!?!?!
luigisk8er 1 year ago
@luigisk8er That's what most astrophysicists are implying, though they haven't got around to dealing with it yet. The astronomical revolution of the 1990's is far greater than the 1610 revolution started by Galileo.
Gravitation may not be Universal, as in the same strength in all times and all places.
geezzerboy 1 year ago
@geezzerboy ok thanks
luigisk8er 1 year ago
our education system is SHIT no wonder so many people are religious
TRUESports09 1 year ago 23
@TRUESports09 ignorant people are dangerous without god to lay their problems on, also not so easy to control!
chiefshaver 7 months ago
I hate constellations as a way of identifying location of stars. I could never learn to recognise them. I guess it takes a lot of imagination to see the shapes.
I would like it much more if we used a space grid of some kind with less curves than the constellations.
gespilk 1 year ago
I gotta say, the music in your videos is always awesome.
ashflower 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All of the constellations shown in this video are bullshit, they don't match the stars at all and are just plopped on the screen for no reason. Real constellations line up with the stars, not a low opacity jpeg slapped on a picture of space.
PunkRock1337 2 years ago
PunkRock1337
Astronomy history fail, the classic view of constellations were infact all stylised.
TheRedneckAtheist 2 years ago 5
Excelent as always Mr.Darnel keep up the good works!
RedneckRager 2 years ago
Tony should watch Knights of the Zodiac anime series, is really cool and astronomical. By the way I bet Tony will like to listen to Luca Turilli and Rhapsody Of Fire bands.
AgentGustavo 2 years ago
If were going to be skeptical about everything, because that is what good scientists do, should we really accept this Dark Matter so swiftly. I mean Einstein showed Newton's flaws. How do we know for sure. I bet their correct though, this is stuff beyond what I know. Hell, I don't have a PHD in astro-phsyics.
UncomfortableSilence 2 years ago 3
That's the whole reason it's called "dark matter," because we don't know what it is. It's just stuff we can't see that creates gravitational lensing.
Barkspawn 2 years ago
magnetism works on electrons within particles/atoms.... photons have almost no measurable state thus anti-light...
stormyrose 2 years ago
first the neutron, now dark matter... astrological accounting...fear of mystery!
stormyrose 2 years ago
Thanks for an excellent video! But is it possible that electric or magnetic fields in space could be responsible not only for the "gravitational lensing" effects, but also for holding together these galactic clusters?
SuperMagnetizer 2 years ago
No, EM fields have no mass so they could not be responsible for holding galaxies together.
Mass attracts mass. Since the photon has no mass, gravitational lensing is what bends light around planets and stars, and any other object with sufficent mass.
Grospoliner 2 years ago
I should clarify that because mass distorts space time (evidence by super massive objects like black holes) that this is why light is bent around masses.
Grospoliner 2 years ago
@cosmored
Mythbusters proved that it wasn't faked, so quit being such an idiot.
mit871chell 2 years ago
I see my info about the moon hoax got marked as spam. I guess they don't want people to see it. Here it is again.
Google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon?". The summary is on page 15. It's the 7th post from the top.
Cosmored2 2 years ago
I just went through that thread and I must say, I am not impressed. You write a bunch of long posts with a lot of links but ultimately, you seem to be operating on the assumption that quantity makes up for quality. It does not.
Your arguments are pretty bad. If anyone tried to prove anything but your chosen pet theory using the same logic that you do, you'd think they're nuts, just as the people at Naked Scientist think you are.
Kytescall 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is off-topic but it's space-related.
There's a mountain of evidence that the Apollo moon missions were faked. I posted a partial summary of it on a science forum. Google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon?". The summary is on page 15. It's the 7th post from the top.
People who still think they went to the moon simply haven't seen the hoax evidence yet.
Cosmored 2 years ago
I've seen the "evidence" for the so-called hoax and frankly it is retarded. Conspiracy theorists lack critical thinking skills. UFO nuts, the 9/11 truthers, the anti-vaccine mob, Apollo 11 hoaxers . . . They're all the same. To believe in any of this crap requires scientific illiteracy and an oblivious detachment from reality.
Kytescall 2 years ago
"I've seen thedetachment from reality."
No one who actually looks at it will agree with you . You seem to be trying to sway people who haven't seen the evidence that they faked the moon landings.
Cosmored 2 years ago
I'm trying to sway people away from embarrassing themselves. The only people who think it was a hoax are paranoid people who think that everything from "Big Pharma" to Reptilians are out to get them, and are willing to use blurry photos, bizarre logic and shameful ignorance of the facts to justify their preset belief.
Kytescall 2 years ago
my friend, you are very close minded, you place too much of your trust in our leaders.
SelfComprehension 2 years ago
It is not "closed minded" to base judgments on evidence and rationality instead of the wish fulfillment of paranoid fantasies. "Leaders" have nothing whatsoever to do with it. Just because you believe in a far fetched and frankly illogical conspiracy theory does not make you a rebel, nor does it make you intelligent, educated or thoughtful.
Kytescall 2 years ago
You are missing the point, it isn't about being intelligent, educated, or thoughtful. It's about searching for truth, you care too much about who your views make you, instead of what they mean. You are refuting arguments that you haven't heard yet, and are trying to insult me and others personally in order to stray the conversation away from the actual argument. It isn't about who's smarter my friend, it may be you or me, but it doesn't matter.
SelfComprehension 2 years ago
I have heard all the arguments. They are scientifically illiterate and logically nonsensical. Like I said, it is not "open-minded" to be fence-sitter when it comes to the ridiculous.
And I "care too much about who my views make me instead of what they mean"? What? Look, I'm sure you get off on sounding insightful but apparently you're not very good at reading people.
Kytescall 2 years ago
Yes, they are scientifically illiterate when formulated by many scientist and engineers. I am curious, what theories have you actually read about? not heard or seen, read.
I'm not reading you, im just interpreting what you said, "Just because you believe in a far fetched and frankly illogical conspiracy theory does not make you a rebel, nor does it make you intelligent, educated or thoughtful." to me, and correct me if im wrong, it sounds like you're focusing on qualities, not the arguments
SelfComprehension 2 years ago
You were the one who accused me of being "closed minded" for rejecting this conspiracy theory. If anyone was focusing on "qualities," obviously it was you.
The conspiracy theory that the Apollo moon landings were a hoax are not formulated by actual scientists and engineers, and any who do are a fringe minority like psychologists who think Freudian psychoanalysis is valid, or biologists who are creationists - no one can take them seriously, and for good reason.
Kytescall 2 years ago
I'll i meant was question before accepting what you believe, just don't follow blindly.
Of course the conspiracy theory that the Apollo moon landings were a hoax is invalid and does not contain any sufficient data to back it up. I was not referring to that theory.
SelfComprehension 2 years ago
I was talking about the Apollo conspiracy theory the whole time. What on earth are you talking about?
Kytescall 2 years ago
"They're all the same. To believe in any of this crap requires scientific illiteracy and an oblivious detachment from reality." this was in reference to all conspiracy theorists in general
SelfComprehension 2 years ago
All of the mainstream conspiracy theories are of the same quality, and stem from the same mindset.
Kytescall 2 years ago
@Kytecall
@SelfComprehension
^That was the best thing I've got to read all day!
jonnyknows 1 year ago
that was a reply to Zipo214
kc2of7x1 2 years ago
You are Jesus
PreciseArrow1 2 years ago
very nice vid indeed
rolflmaoweeee 2 years ago
Very nice video from hubble ! I want to know what is the dark matter ?
Thank you for sharing .
nutier
nutier 2 years ago
my father in law is head researcher of atmospheric science at NASA in huntsville alabama, and i am pretty sure nasa is pretty honest.
xsensorydeceptionx 2 years ago
hey so i just recently heard from someone that original pictures taken by hubbel of certain images are not as vivid as reported , certain images such as the cat's eye nebula can anyone confirm or disprove this cuz i dont believe it, i believe our telescopes are advanced enough to see the colors and spectrums of light that particles and elements make in certain vibrantly colored nebulas and formations
Zipo214 2 years ago
The detectors of Hubble can only see black and white. However, by measuring the same object 3 times, each time with a different colour filter, we can get 3 different "coloured" images. The images are then processed off-line and they result in the great pictures that are presented.
mvoncken 2 years ago
when they take a picture of a nebulae there is actually no color in the gas itself. Its clear gas but its is several different kinds of gas. They use certain filters or instruments to detect the gases. For example red might be Hydrogen while blue might be Oxygen and green Nitrogen..... I don't know the actual color schemes but because of this it is almost definitely computer enhanced.
a picture of the nebulae without any computer filter would be blank sky
still very beautiful tho :)
kc2of7x1 2 years ago 3
Politicians and journalists lie more often than NASA ever will or could, you retarded assholes! Leave NASA alone and fuck off with your conspiracy theories! Do something useful, like commit suicide - in fact, while you're at it, take the politicians and journalists with you. Tell them God told you to do it - collective suicide. Get the bankers, the Mafia, and religious people to join, too. All they do is fuck everybody else up -including themselves, actually.
ZeHoSmusician 2 years ago 22
@ZeHoSmusician Hey man! you should seriously look upon your comments . IYou may sit sometime alone where there is no body. and think about your creation and its purpose . iam sure that you would most likely found the truth and thats the Presence of one and only GOD, ALLAH. The you would also recognize the truthness of all the Prophets including the last Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him). And this recognition is the key for entering a paradise on the Final day of judgement & its succes
uzairzafar844 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ZeHoSmusician Hey man! you should seriously look upon your comments . IYou may sit sometime alone where there is no body. and think about your creation and its purpose . iam sure that you would most likely find the truth and thats the Presence of one and only GOD, ALLAH. The you would also recognize the truthness of all the Prophets including the last Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him). And this recognition is the key for entering a paradise on the Final day of judgement & its success
uzairzafar844 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ZeHoSmusician Hey man! you should seriously look upon your comments . You may sit sometime alone where there is no body. and think about your creation and its purpose . iam sure that you would most likely find the truth and thats the Presence of one and only GOD, ALLAH. The you would also recognize the truthness of all the Prophets including the last Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him). And this recognition is the key for entering a paradise on the Final day of judgement & its success
uzairzafar844 11 months ago
@ZeHoSmusician Harsh, but true.
TjRmusic24 4 months ago
do they release single lensing picture of region or multiple scans ? because single i kno they usually just show picture for press release but it is there any with minimal editing which will interest me more because oddly enough i can duplicate lensing effect in using a photo editor
okuma0kuma 2 years ago
Great job! That was very well done. The zodiac overlays gave an eerie feel to it. Like linking ancient mythology to the latest in technology! ha that rhymed! Awesome vid!
PhoenixDown11 2 years ago
Great hi def vid. Darnell your channel rocks!
hoplite1766 2 years ago
I stared into infinity... and I freaked out a little.
EdouardDubois 2 years ago
Did anyone notice, he basiccly put exactly what he said into the description..>.>
Hidd3nLeaf 2 years ago
Nice catch. I basically copied the intro part of my script there.
tdarnell 2 years ago 2
Oh Okie dokes. :)
Hidd3nLeaf 2 years ago
the music suits this video perfectly! amazing pictures too
edstar83 2 years ago
Incredible
Badasscow 2 years ago
great pics,its a shame that nasa lies about alot of stuff.
davymatheny 2 years ago
Lies? How does NASA lie? Lying in what way?
ZeHoSmusician 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
well,first of all they wont admit theres 'ufos' out there and alot of their footage shows it.2nd what they are realy doing on other planets.nasa would be great if they were honest about things,i know i would donate money[what little i have]to them.take a look at some of there pics and notice how heavely edited they are,why?what dont they want us to see and why?they say only rocks are out there but we see black spots cover up somethings.also google earth,look at the moon and you can tell here to.
davymatheny 2 years ago
Sorry, but I have no time for conspiracy theorists, especially for something that's been repeatedly debunked. There are no UFOs on NASA's photos. Good bye.
ZeHoSmusician 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
keep youre mind close,eyes closed then.i have seen 1 real space craft,not only are you calling me a lair but 1/3 of the earths population a lair also.and yes they are photos,even videos!do some research before pulling the lair card out.and as far as being 'debunked' lol.how can you debunke something that 'doesnt exist'.so you might ought to make time to search this out,unless you dont want to 'know'.
davymatheny 2 years ago
1/3 HAHAHAHAHA get your facts straight. I don't think you lie. I belief that you belief you saw a space craft.
GodOfTheInternets 2 years ago
Oh you and your stupid conspiracy theories.
Get out more.
GodOfTheInternets 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Well, they lie about everything!
iruss71 2 years ago
I can't help but wonder how many more "final mission"s NASA will send to Hubble. I truly hope many more. Although future space-based platforms are in the works, they are mostly plans for radio telescopes. Nothing compares to the beauty of a good old-fashioned optical telescope.
akhenatten 2 years ago
Does gravitational lensing imply space time warping? Are those streched galaxies experiencing a different time frame than us observing it from earth?
dev777v 2 years ago
wow,too cool dude,too cool. i am very thankful for your videos,keep up the amazing work
nucliosis 2 years ago
Thanks again.
starquasar1 2 years ago
That picture of that streched out galaxy is one of the most interesting I've seen in... ever.
What I was wondering, is dark matter/energy three dimensional or what? As someone less-than-an-amateur I am completely clueless. Can you collide with it for example?
Thank you for the video and keep it up
asalade 2 years ago
2:11 kind of looks like a berded man with a hat giving the finger :P
Amazing video Tony, I learned alot from it. Your videos are so interesting and well put together, I look forward to each and every one. Keep it up! :D
N1ntenOwned 2 years ago
LMFAO i totaly see the bearded man flippin the bird and dose ne1 know the name of the song 1:50
sk8er7275 2 years ago
Lets hope commercial space flight happens in our lifetime.
DeathBomb669 2 years ago
Great video! Keep it going Tony!
MariusGuitar2007 2 years ago
Thanks for all the great comments guys! I want you to know I'm taking your suggestions to heart.
I'm giving up on scripts, everyone seems to like them better. For the vlogs I mean. The narrated videos will always have scripts.
I've kept a list of questions and am presenting videos of those soon, answering many of the most often asked questions on this channel.
Keep the comments and suggestions coming.
Also, I KNOW I need better sound equipment. I'll get better mics soon, I promise!
tdarnell 2 years ago
Another amazing video from you Tony!
Axis82 2 years ago
Honestly, your one of my heroes haha
505bart505 2 years ago
You know shit!!!
psilocyberspaceman 2 years ago
Simply Amazing!~
Great job once again Tony ;D
iHeartKT 2 years ago
Hurm. It is all exactly as the Mayans predicted.
clownpenisfart 2 years ago
awesome
dutchbhproduction 2 years ago
whoa!!!!!!!!!!!!111
yoon715 2 years ago
thanks for it.
txbanido 2 years ago
WOW
cosi66 2 years ago
Love your videos. Thanks for keeping us updated. You make me really want to take another astronomy class.
KeiKusanagiDekar 2 years ago 5
I think you'd have a great experience. Give it a shot!
tdarnell 2 years ago
BRILLIANT!!
plasticbudgie 2 years ago
Imagine what kind of pictures they'll have in ten years.
You never cease to blow my mind Tony.
Greywyn7 2 years ago
thats pathetic they should be able to make a much better telescope than that.
AEVautomatic 2 years ago
it would be cool if it were that easy. Do you realize how magnified these images are? Also, giant space telescopes are hard to make and expensive
ki11erdrag0n 2 years ago
yes i do. this telescope is shit for how much it cost.
AEVautomatic 2 years ago
my god! Another awesome video Tony, keep em up!!
William1990hill 2 years ago 3
it appears that you like this telescope
sonofagunM357 2 years ago
You make HD on youtube look SICK!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mattersmatter 2 years ago 4
Thanks! Umm, that is a good thing, right?
tdarnell 2 years ago
Awesome video +
matcah 2 years ago
I think I'm having a Jodie Foster moment.
PurushaDesa 2 years ago
Heh, heh... I know just what you mean...
tdarnell 2 years ago
You make awesome videos Tony. Thank you for presenting what is truly important: the final frontier.
terr547 2 years ago
Thanks! You guys make it totally worth it.
tdarnell 2 years ago
Once again, another amazing video. Thanks Tony ,keep posting great vids :)
c4mpbell 2 years ago
1. doesn't dark matter force everything in the universe away? 2. you always find the right music. 3. thanks for posting another awesome educating video.
sorry8140 2 years ago
1. I think that's dark energy your thinking of
m0osey 2 years ago
1) It's dark energy that's believed responsible for the acceleration of the universe.
2) Thanks, I have actually been purchasing the rights using donation from this channel. It's space fans like you that make it possible!
3) Your very welcome. Thank you for watching.
tdarnell 2 years ago
Comment removed
JmSantos78 2 years ago
Another great video Tony
TodaysThought 2 years ago
Incredible! This would be fantastic for trying to convey to somebody who hasn't really thought about this kind of stuff much just how enormous and magnificent space is.
AleximusMaximus 2 years ago
SEXY TIME
IVISolnxIVI 2 years ago
Loved it! 5 stars!
EvanLarimore 2 years ago
I know this may be a big ask, but could you do a non-speech video with the animations and pictures in sequence. I'm amazed by the way you've explained all this, but my friends would probably get bored and are much more likely to just want to see the pretty things and an overlay of text to explain what's going on.
(could use the final animation of the light in HST to segue into the images)
The background music works very well, as always, to create a great mood :) I love these
scharfy 2 years ago
Your wish is my command. Many people have asked for this, so I complied.
Check out the latest video: The Hubble is Back and Better than Ever!
Thanks for the suggestion and for watching this channel!
tdarnell 2 years ago
Awesome video, thanks
Zach1O8 2 years ago
this is just amazing. i love space and learning about it.
musicrockshard1 2 years ago
Unbelievable. Your videos never cease to leave me in awe. Thank you for these videos. I play them for my kids, their friends, friends of ours, basically anyone I can convince to look at my screen for 5 minutes, and the reaction is always the same. Awe and amazement.
troyboulay 2 years ago
Love your vids...Always loved astronomy..tho I never felt smart enough to actually "do it"...I was never good in math....I love space tho,it intrigues me..and needless to say..I am a Trekkie...are you a Trak fan, and do you beleive in Life on other worlds..at this very moment..light years away? I do.
rextrek 2 years ago 4
I am a trek fan, especially the original series.
Yes I think there are life on other worlds, right now. In fact, I think we are on the verge of an inflection point, where we will soon discover not just one new civilization, but many.
tdarnell 2 years ago
This is just awesome. 5/5
themax37 2 years ago
Amazing and Awesome.Thanks for all your hard work.
Rupetthebear 2 years ago
One of the better videos you've made. Awesome!
noodlerII 2 years ago
keep them coming! great video
Daniel13999 2 years ago
Thank you tony!
subotaj 2 years ago
5 stars
skaterkid1477 2 years ago
Another awesome video! I love the zoom animations.
One nitpicky thing: you said we could calculate the "weight" of the object whose gravity creates the lens; I think it's more accurate to say "mass."
Cadwaladr 2 years ago
Yes, I agree. Mass would have been the better term, sometimes I try to say things a little too simplistically. I need to pick it up a notch for you space fans!
Thanks for the comment!
tdarnell 2 years ago
awesome..thank you for posting and explaining..look forward to the next.
ongle1 2 years ago
great! great! great!
and Pegasus rocks! ;)
freeman444 2 years ago
Great video. Thanks for posting!
NeedsEvidence 2 years ago
Superb video
kel2corkey 2 years ago
Great video once again.
Dryatu 2 years ago
Those photographs from Hubble are breath-taking - they made me sit up straight and pay more attention!
robertghouston 2 years ago
Awesome! Thanks a lot for yet another great video! I'm really looking forward seeing more of your videos. Maybe something where you explain things like the pictures seen in this video and dark matter in more detail.
toffotin 2 years ago
I LOVE those zoom-ins. I am a space fans.
ScottishAtheist 2 years ago
Wow thank you soo much for these videos.. they are amazing. hope you keep them coming..
aerobatic500 2 years ago
can u explain what all these things mean
SaucyBoii 2 years ago
Awesome video, and thank you for explaining what gravitational lensing was, I love to learn about deep space.
CRXspeedshift 2 years ago
Cool... I feel smart for actually knowing what gravitational lensing was before the video. Are there any examples of it in the Hubble Deep Field photo? I could of sworn I seen some.
Mattson402 2 years ago
yeah
mummafier 2 years ago
Thanks for sharing!
AgeTurnipseed 2 years ago
good vid and GREAT pics. Really stunning.
Greetings and keep up good work.
Bercik87 2 years ago
Freaking awesome...
SmknGunz 2 years ago
amazing video
scarthman 2 years ago
great video once again
darkskyva1234 2 years ago
wicked cool....thanks for the vid, it is wonderful as always. Hope all goes well for you and your research...peace be with and looking forward to your next contribution
MasterOhSo 2 years ago