Added: 3 years ago
From: RidleyReport
Views: 114,348
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (217)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What happened to her?

  • Just what is this woman on trial for in the first place? She let her husband drive her car.  Once you know how to drive you know how to drive, a license is no more than a tax on people who drive.

  • best ads ever. I really appreciate your videos.

  • well....people in small states need stuff to do as well i guess

  • But, for some strange and unknown reason, Congress decided to keep it on the down low. Because most people didn't know about it, they just kept paying taxes.

    So I guess we are all here today, still paying the Victory Tax voluntarily. Tell me, do you feel victorious?

  • According to tax historian John Witte, "In 1939, about 15% of the people paid income tax. That's all, period. At the end of the war, we had 80% of our families paying income tax." In 1944, the Victory Tax was repealed by section 6 of the Income Tax Act of 1944 after it had been renewed.

  • im opposed to the income tax , taxes on goods like sales tax, property tax im not a anarchist you fascist cunt

  • @mrsinister03 LOL so how do you suppose our Country will pay for ANYTHING if there are no taxes...

  • Comment removed

  • Please, Please, Stop that stupid singing. I can't even play the audio no more on your videos because everybody here is just soooo tired of hearing it 2, 3 or 4 times every time I watch one of your videos, including me. You present serious subjects, so stop trying to be funny, or having a catchy little thing, or whatever your trying to do, it's not working brother. Anyway not here, it's annoying as hell, and takes away from the subject. I don't want to start avoiding your videos because of it.

  • No such thing as a victimless crime. 

  • @aligerous I J-walked on the way home and there was no one around. Whos the victim?

  • @ADSaaron If you did it in California, the victim would be the state of California. Same as if you drove 100 MPH on the freeway. You didn't physically hurt a person or any property but if you got cited for said offense, the victim in the criminal case would be listed as the state. If it's listed in the penal code, vehicle code, municipal code etc. as a crime and the victim is not an individual, the victim is the state, the people of that state who voted for the reps who passed the law.

  • @aligerous Lets say i live in Claifornia, do you now feel victimnized that i j walked? and btw, im honestly not being a smart ass. You just have an interesting point

  • @ADSaaron No, I don't think I would lose sleep over your jaywalking nor would I feel personally victimized if you were speeding down the freeway and the entire state was safe in their houses asleep. But, as the laws are currently written in most, if not all states, exceptions are not made for the individual feelings of the citizens of a particular city, state, etc. If enough people have a problem with the way a law is written, they can always speak with their elected representative about it.

  • "misdemeaner"... really. If your going to make a video, please check your spelling. As for the law is to collect money from people... really man. If I leave a bar drunk and get pulled over, but I didn't kill anyone does that mean its ok. Laws are in place to protect the people of the state, keep records for the state and yes sometimes there are fees. STFU and get back in your volvo and go back to where you came from "FREE STATER". You move to NH for more freedom but criticize everything.

  • Sigh, there are always the people who whine that the government isn't making enough laws and that they are unprotected and then there are the smartass people who think it's cool to be some sort of rebel and question every sort of law as unconstitutional. I question why anyone would seek to work in government when they have to deal with these ends of the spectrum on a daily basis.

  • Lol .. "This is not Rhode Island" hate that I'm from RI!

  • Why did this guy bark?

  • "It is not true that the function of law is to regulate our conciousness, our ideas, our wills, our education, our opinions, our work, our trade, our talents or our pleasures. The function of law is to protect our free excersise of these rights." ~ Frederic Bastait The function of law is to maintain JUSTICE. The right of a man to protect himself, his family, his property and his liberty thru proxy. We pay their saleries. The purpose of LAW is to protect and to serve us!

  • buying drugs and funding drug wars is not a harmless crime. If you dont like the laws, then vote. If you can't handle the democratic process, then go live somewhere else.

  • @TheMeghan7373 What democratic process? We are a republic. We haven't had true democracy ever. It's too bad but perhaps soon we will, that is until the next era the government becomes corrupt again and has to be dismantled like the last.

  • im from RI...

  • Holy shit thats judge Kinghorn right? Ive been in his court too many times

  • What was she there for?

  • How boring.

  • I Live In Rhode Island XD hahaha

  • @RobloxFan166

    My condolences.

    Just as bad as my home state.

  • Having to listen to your "free minds tv dot com, ruff" being sung is terribly punishing. It's just my opinion but I sure wish you wouldn't do that.

  • WOW! With the economy the way it is;this is an easy way for the State to increase revenue. What about real crime? On a weekend I get out of work @11:30 p. the State Troopers are doing their part by sitting on the highway just looking for someone to go 66 mph. I usually see about 3 of them on the side 93 N and S. and I've only got a 20 min. ride home!

  • Even if it is a non violent crime like allowing an unlicenced driver to drive your vehical it is still a crime and laws are one the books to follow not break. When you break them as she did by allowing him to drive you have to face the consiquences.

  • @Lord666Belial

    Wow, that's a very philosophically enlightened and morally responsible worldview. NOT. That's like if a woman got raped, tried to resist the rapist, n got murdered as a result, n then u said "She shouldn't hav tried to resist." What u said is stupid, and it's that kind of thought that is causing us to descend into a blatantly despotic, totalitarian society.

  • @CarbineKingClassic Self defence is different that annowing an unlicenced driver to drive a vehical.

  • @Lord666Belial

    It didn't say she let an unlicensed person drive her vehicle. It said she let a person drive her vehicle without checking to make sure they had a license. It was probly somebody who had a license n she knew had a license n she jus didn't check immediately before allowing them to drive

  • @CarbineKingClassic She allowed a person to drive her car and it turned out they didnt have a licence so she in fact let an unlicenced driver drive her car.

  • @Lord666Belial because you call the police and do a drivers license check anytime you let anyone drive your car.

    god youre a fucking idiot.

    piss off, stop wasting precious oxygen and go kill yourself.

  • @OMGItsWeasel No I do not allow anyone to drive my vehicles other than myself.  Furthermore if I was to do so I would ask to see their license to make sure they in face did possess one.

  • @Lord666Belial holding the physical drivers license card and having a valid drivers license are two separate things. You can have your license suspended and still obtain the card that says its valid. No one goes around collecting drivers licenses cards of people who have had their driving privileges revoked.

    again, go kill yourself.

  • @OMGItsWeasel That again goes back the the fact of not letting others drive your vehicle.  She commited a crime by allowing an unlicenced driver to operate her car. Fact remains that she was still at fault for it.

  • I hope this cops wife and family sees this footage and shames him into killing himself

  • I am so glad that people who are clear-minded, and without desiring to harass anyone, are standing up for their inherent rights! This is the only way anyone will get through these days and months, without become a statistic. Please, continue to be respectable people, who care for all others, especially those who have jobs and must serve as they are told to do. Those who harass you, must be seen as "not in control," and "doing their jobs." Respect them, and they will respect you. Congrats!

  • You gave no indication of the accused's alleged crimes, so I find this video useless.

  • YOur mind isn't free, you are bound by stupidity. Sounds like this lady should have been locked up.

  • hmmm...so the gist of the vid is, the woman is a criminal, but it's not fair to prosecute criminals unless YOU approve. You provided no facts, just a few scattered statements which are highly suspect because you are CLEARLY not telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Makes you a scumbag, not a "hero" "fighting for rights". grow up.

  • @kenfo0 what "fact"did you provide to establish that she's a ""criminal." the fact that she is accused? i wouldn't call you a "scumbag" just another ill-educated person who wants to live in a police state where people are deemed guilty just by reason of accusation.

  • @zal Hmmm....my comment was to the poster of a vid, and here you are determining she did nothing and telling me I'm "ill-educated". I am FAR more educated than you, kid. You then whine "you want to live in a police state". Sorry, wrong again asshole. Where does that leave you? Right where you started; an arrogantly stupid asshole with a big mouth. I watched the vid and I understand human behavior and I posted facts (no facts, but a lot of value statements). Liars are scumbags. Grow up.

  • @kenfo0 Since you're well-educated, you do understand that words have meanings. "Liars" are people who habitually and knowingly tell falsehoods; not necessarily people who disagree with you. Calling people "assholes" and "scumbags" shows a lack of finesse, originality and civility in argumentation. Using perjorative words like "whine" to dismiss another's argument is silly and propagandistic. I won't call you names; your tone and writing speak volumes.

  • @zalman595 yes, I am highly educated, and you are a dunce. A liar is one who lies. A habitual liar is one who lies habitually. A pathological liar is one who lies, even when the lie wouldn't matter and the liar is likely to get caught. Glad I could educate you. I doubt it will "take". Your whining opining about "a-holes, scumbags and whiners" simply shows you don't like yourself. Fortunately, you can CHOOSE to change. You won't, but you could.  I have no concern what you think of me.

  • @kenfo0 You're right. People can choose to change. Why would I choose to change because I had the good fortune to run into some hostile name-caller on the internet? Please, don't respond because it 's only a rhetorical question. I'm through communicating with you and am only too glad to leave our comments up here in juxtaposition for any others who venture here to see. Your education and profound understanding of human nature shine right through. Keep that smile in your heart.

  • @zal I know I'm right. I. I didn't ask for your weak input. I am highly educated, you are a dunce. Whine all you like, it doesn't change that fact. aaaww, shucks....are you "through communicating" with me? That's such a shame. Anyone not a dolt will see your pathetic attempt to raise your station by trying to "yoose big werdz". How are you going to "leave my comments up..."? Oh, I see. You are a fucking liar and coward, w/more than 1 account to hide behind...

  • THIS ISNT RHODE ISLAND -cop goes silent

  • I cant believe I live in NH with some of you paranoid, conspiracy obsessed dipshits. Then agaon Chesire and Grafton county is imfamous for its high population of inbreds.

  • @PowerfulPunch You can't even spell "again" or "infamous" so your point is moot.

  • @Lockdotz Can spell, cant type. My apologies Daniel Webster

  • @PowerfulPunch Just shows your intelligence level when you can't even bother to proof read an insult on someone else's intelligence.

  • @Lockdotz Really. Thats all you got? An issue of spelling an not responding to the whole insult thing you threw at me for mistyping? I'll get better at typing, thank you for pointing my lack of typing skills. I owe you.

  • @PowerfulPunch Responding to your insult would only lend credence to a poorly thought out and small minded generalization. Which again just shows how little you actually know. All you owe me is silence and acceptance of how stupid you are.

  • @Lockdotz Seriously anthing you have you attacks of my typing skill? I owelled you a typo genius, and while I dont still cant figure out what exactly your coppy of Rogets says, still, whats your beef beyond the typo? C mon, tell me?

  • @Lockdotz Seriously anthing you have you attacks of my typing skill? I owelled you a typo genius, and while I dont still cant figure out what exactly your coppy of Rogets says, still, whats your beef beyond the typo? C mon, tell me?

    And yeah copy was mispelled

    As was old. and any other I mistyped. You almost seem like a journalism wannabe. Just like FRidley

  • @PowerfulPunch Typing skill or not even if it was typed perfectly it still would be a idiotic statement which is fitting because you are a moron. With that I consider all other replies from you just an affirmation to that so I'm done with you. Slink back into bliss of ignorance and anger.

  • @Lockdotz You're done with me? Thank God! Best of luck in your future endeavors so long as they dont conflict with mine.

  • Was really hoping Ridley was hiking along the Iraq-Iran border...oh well! 

  • there are 11 cops out there with nothing else to do but harrass innocent citizens.

  • @NdaWoodz Then go to Iran where you will have it a lot better.

  • An individual who allows another individual to drive their car is responsible for ensuring that the individual is a licensed driver. If you lend your vehicle to an unlicensed driver, you as the owner are held responsible. It's a simple law that is in place throughout our states. The law is in place to protect others on the road.

  • @AMDIVER the law is in place to collect money from, peoples pockets

  • @mrsinister03 although some of the laws are unfair..but what you said is not true at all

  • @WolverinePlusbeaST it is all completely 100% true.

  • @mrsinister03 my friend it is your opinion...not a fact. (:

  • @mrsinister03 the comma is in place to incorrectly, separate one thought

  • @mrsinister03 Well if you give somebody a gun knowing they will use it to kill somebody does that mean your not a murderer for giving said person the gun?

  • @bestwaffleg no, you are just an accomplice. 

  • @mrsinister03 are you talking about a paticular law or just in general? because if it is in general, you really are one of the dumbest people I have ever responded to. If it is to a paticular law, then what suggestion do you have to replace the fine? Maybe we should break legs, cut off fingers and hands or what they hell just don't have a penalty for anything. Maybe I should just carry my shotgun on my back after I snort some coke and head into a manchester bar.

  • @IRAForLife maybe you should

  • @mrsinister03 I already have and won a 2 year seat.

  • @IRAForLife you got coked up and went into a bar with a shotgun and won a 2 year seat? your a dumb cunt is all you are

  • @mrsinister03 Laws are in place becasue people took advantage of them, to prevent that from happening their is a fine attached to almost every law you break. Personally if I get caught doing something illegal and it doesn't hinder my way of life in any way, I will most likely do it again. If you think you have a better way to govern people then run for office and try to change it. But to say "the law is in place to collect money from people" is just dumb.

  • @IRAForLife i suppose you believe taxes are in place to teach citizens lessons as well,.. i bet you also think that the taxes you pay actually pay for things in and around your community,... you say government ,. i say mafia,.. you say police i say thugs,..you say freedom,.. i say ??

  • @mrsinister03 hahaha you are so ignorant it hurts! I'll play your game for a second, scratch taxes it steals money from the people. So how is your anacry going to approach infrastructure? Because now your government does not recieve taxes there for I would assume they aren't responsible for bridges, roads or light maintenence. Who is then and with what money? I do say freedom, and you have the freedom to immigrate.

  • @IRAForLife Constitution states in Article 1, section 9, "No capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken."

  • @mrsinister03 All you are is an idealist. Taxes are in place to pay for things like Infrastructure, Social Security, Healthcare programs, Civil Service Worker wages, Defense, etc. Laws are put into place to protect people (We all have laws we don't agree with, that may be controversial) and fines are put into place to prevent those laws from being broken. If there was no consequence for speeding I'd be doing 90 every time I hit the highway. Please tell me how something like that is "victimless"

  • @AMDIVER Here's an idea how about the non-licensed driver be responsible for their own actions??????

  • For everyone that says U.S is the most corrupt go live in a fascist country get imprisoned there and see if your rights are being protected. I'm sure they will treat you better. I love my country.

  • What a man Ridley is, if he had any guts he'd be in Afghanistan...instead he has nothing else to do but to spend Daddy's money by doing what he does, which is nothing constructive...

  • @BushMass well, i served in the desert, and i like what he's doing. be in afghanistan for what? none of these countries had weapons until our military industrial complex sold them some. we're not there to build pipelines? who is gonna benefit? us? common man will benefit cause now americans will sell us gas? maybe or maybe not, just tired of the lies. say what you mean and mean what you say. but after seeing a video with charles jaco from cnn, no telling how deep the rabbit hole is. :)

  • mr ridley i have to ask you this cuse i was born and raised in massachussetts . what can we the people do to get rid of all this trash that the poeple put in to office

    im mass you have to pay 100.00 to the state to get a pistol perment 4- 6 years ant that part of my right as a law biden us cidison what can we do with a hole like massachussetts vermont have no gun laws or fire work laws why cant we live in america

  • @majinboo75 Vermont has gun laws. You are incorrect. As far as Mass goes that is easy leave.......

  • @majinboo75 Its 100 dollars yes its wrong but you would spend more money and probably more than 6 years to have that overturned.

  • @NdaWoodz No, US corruption doesn't beat Russian. But Russian people is the main factor why they sit in that, in US, to the contrary, there is much less of slave-like mentality in people.

  • Does anyone reallly give a flip about her crap? You show no foundation for what she was charged with, etc. She could be a child molestor for all you have said. Douchetards.

  • you can say all you want about america but its far better then other countrys, except canada probly. they seam so peacefull lol

  • @thegreatninjaman

    You don't get out much uh? Sorry, no, its not, USA is not far better than other countries. Its been going downhill for a while now.

  • @NdaWoodz definitely not accurate

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • The judge was smart, but the cop had a tiny head. People with tiny heads shouldn't try to control people with larger heads and interfere with them. In America we have too many dopes gumming up the works.

  • @tabitie I laughed very much on this statement of fact and truth.

  • @tabitie wtf. what does a persons head size have to do with anything?

  • @BeingNobody1956 joke

    you

  • @tabitie ROFLMAO!

  • @tabitie Well said, Sir.

  • Respond to this video... ...or ma'am...

  • what was she charged with?

  • What was the point of this video. She got a PR (Personal Recognisance Bond)? Tell where in this country does this not happen every day? The judge said "This is not Rhode Island" how is that a spite at the prosecutor? That looked more like a cop, and the cop was answering a question by the judge "Does this woman have a history." Well yes in another state, albeit minor.

  • @deputycorndog It is a cop as they are the prosecutor there. If they get rid of the judge they could save even more money. This once great country is going right down the toilet.

  • @deputycorndog the point of this video is.. the bigwheel disrespected the piss ant

  • When will the time come that we the people will have to defend ourselves from an out of control tyrannical government

  • "Did you really think that we want those laws to be observed?"said Dr. Ferris. "We want them broken.You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against - then you'll know that this is not the age for beautiful gestures. We're after p o w e rand we mean it. You fellows were pikers, but we know the real trick, and you'd better get wise to it

  • There's no way to rule innocent men.The onlyp o w e rany government has is thep o w e rto crack down on criminals.Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them.

  • What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted - and you create a nation of law-breakers - and then you cash in on guilt.Now, that's the system, Mr. Rearden, that's the game and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with." ~Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

  • captwasabi your missing the point of the drug law .. if they try to take your guns by force you dont turn them in and fight the law you are obligated by all free people to not olny fight for your freedom aka the ones you like but all freedoms remember when they came for the jews i said nothing story ?. support all the people who want freedom and i will support you

  • @NdaWoodz The most clueless, moronic drooling idiot in the world probably due to illegal drug use, NdaWoodz.

  • So exactly what IS she charged with?

  • did u bark?

  • i had that judge he's better than some. he was exceptionally fair with me

  • I had cops come over to my home late one night saying "we want to talk to you about what you're writing in the newspapers"! It's gone downhill from there.

  • @IdolHans Wow, really ? Too bad you kept talkin to them.

  • @oldpreach I didn't answer the door----they called later and they were annoying as hell. I think they are going to end up in Federal court.

  • Can you give me an example of a "victimless crime"?

  • @gotgank drug use. of course harming your own body is not a crime as your not hurting someone else or their property.

  • @circusboy90210

    Your not always directly hurting others but how many people who use drugs (i'm talking about the ones with serious heath consequences) pay for their own health care? I don't want to stereotype, but the majority of people who use hard drugs are low class and rely on medicaid. When they need to see a doctor or go to the hospital as a result of their drug use, who has to fork over the bill? Personal drug use doesn't physically hurt other people, but it puts a strain on the system.

  • @circusboy90210

    Also, drug use can cause a person to commit crimes when they otherwise wouldn't. Drugs alter the mind and people lose their ability to rationally think. Personal drug use should be a crime because one way or the other, other people will be affected by it.

  • @NYSP22DAVID crime rises because illegality produces a black market  that increases prices to the point where criminality becomes necessary. before drugs were made illegal there were relatively few addicts. their deaths genetically reduces addicts in the future.

  • @circusboy90210

    So you think making every illegal drug legal will decrease these problems?

  • @NYSP22DAVID read history . when drugs were legal very few people actually overdosed or robbed anyone. you be the judge from their.

  • @circusboy90210 Pure and utter bullshit. People died from opium use in China in DROVES mainly because it was NOT regulated. Hell, people die today from legal drugs use. Your assumption that "legal drugs" don't kill in the same volume is patently false.

  • @captwasabi marijuana is legal in Holland to seperate it out from the hard drugs. Drug traffickers there are prosecuted hard, but abusers of drugs are treated as people with a disease, not as criminals.. which works. In America they love having drug addicts, since they can prosecute them to make money for the injustice system. The US pharm industry makes people into addicts. Big Pharm in the US are basically drug pushers made legal and subsidized by the US government.

  • @Striker4928 Well, it is my opinion that they should be treated as criminals. No one is ever forced to take drugs. These people make the concious choice to violate the laws of the land. Whether you see these as "victimless crimes" or not is irrelevant. They are crimes. If you want the law changed you fight to change it. You do not have the freedom or the right to simply ignore the laws you find bothersome. The rest of your comment is idiocy.

  • @captwasabi that's your opinion because you were born a "true" american hypocrite who wants to criminalize everybody. I bet you were one of those fat american ghouls gathered around tv sets watching shock and awe maim & kill hundreds of thousands of women and children, i.e. a hypocrite who adores the violence created by your religion the "laws of the land". US has great propaganda to cover up that it has no freedom & NO democracy in any sense of the word. That's why US government loves China.

  • @Striker4928 Like I said, you're a fucking moron and no longer worth my time. If you fail to see the incredible freedoms we have here, one of the most important one's you yourself are making use of right at this very moment, there's nothing I can doabout that. I just can't fix stupid.

  • @captwasabi in the us where I'm concerned about this is not true. for the most part very few people died in the past when drugs were legal. matter of fact cocaine was actually favored by the federal government for longshoremen. chinas drug problem was created by the britisht to satisfy the debt china had. read more history before you make uninformed conjecture

  • @NYSP22DAVID By legalizing drugs you take take the black market out of it, up until the 20's you could order heroin in a catalog. You could get whatever you wanted, freedom to do what you want to your own body. You still had addicts but NOTHING like today, by making it illegal they made it WORSE. IE When Alcohol was illegal, that opened up a whole new spectrum of crime. If you outlawed fly fishing you would have people on the corner selling flies. If just pot was legal all thos cartels die

  • @lanasa8 Another idiot hear from. First, by those "Cartels" I'm assuming you are referring to the MExican cartels? If so you are wrong. By and large they ship cocaine. Why? Because it sells for far more per pound than does marijuana. There's also tons of deaths associated with your "mail order heroin" and other potions. I can partially agree with regulating marijuana but none of the other drugs. Any drug that can kill from a single use must remain illegal.

  • @gotgank Smoking weed

  • this means nothing, it is a bail hearing. he is just saying that she doesn't have a record in the state that she is living in, therefore not a threat to the community. these videos are pointless.

  • Interesting stuff. All the videos I've seen of ridleyreport tells me that I need to stay the hell away from New Hampshire. I feel bad for you guys up there. Ya'll are really oppressed. Why don't all the citizens just move out and we can turn the state into one big paint ball competition park. I can't get arrested on an out of state warrant for saying that can I. New Hampshire justice is what nightmares are made of. Good luck folks.

  • @082550 Really how is that? It seems that NH values personal freedoms and doesnt bust thier citizenrys balls over bs like parking tickets and other ridiculous things.

    Seems like a great place to live.

  • nh is the mofo bomb fire works LEGAL HELLS TO THE YES!!!!!!!!

  • @082550 LOL PAINTBALL PARK LOL That sounds good to me.

  • Ugg - please use public defenders. You can second-chair them if you chose so that they will do nothing more than advise you as to points of material law. There is no upside to not using them.

  • That was a waste, there wasn't any resolution!! Sorry this is a fail.

  • This is an examining trial, I think..Can't think of another reason for the cop to be standing where he is ?

  • dark is not the opposite of light, its the absense of light. its all about the $

  • Absurd.

    Visit other countries and see their corruption sometime.

  • By that rationale every other country should be fine with their citizens committing murder because ours is worse. Same logic.

  • no it means that despite the many imperfections in our society we are still better than most.

  • Visit 'other' countries? Which countries would you be referring to exactly? I used the word 'many' when i left the original comment. Certainly, many countries are overwhelmed with corrupt government, while other's not so much. The United States, although we have issues of our own which need to be worked out, happens to have the best system in the world in my opinion. Opinions aside, our government consistently ranks as being one of the worlds least corrupt.

  • @NDNPolice "our government consistently ranks as being one of the world's least corrupt"

    my intent is not to insult you as a person, but nevertheless quite seriously, are you living and working under an immovable rock? responding directly to your post, one can speculate that there's more to this mess than you are aware of. specifics are everywhere so if you choose to respond, please don't bother to ask for any. as for 'least corrupt' I think readers would like to be directed to clear evidence.

  • Liberal ideaology is a large part of the problem in my opinion. I doubt if a government exists in the world which is entirely free of courruption. Out of all the conspiracy theories and nonsense that is put forth, very few are legitimate issues which need to be investigated. The fact is that the folks who worry about such things are nothing more than paranoid conspiracy theorist imbeciles who should seek professional counciling to assist them with removing their cranium from their rectum. :-)

  • @NDNPolice I suppose readers expect more substance than 'I know better; you're an ass hat', etc. simply, it isn't bad form to disagree politely and respectfully.

    if there was clearly NO evidence to suggest an oligarchy of any sort (to address one overarching conspiracy "theory") then we may wonder why all four hemispheres are being visited by the same strong-arm ghost.

    in any case, dissent can be one of the most patriotic voices. consider that patriotism may be outlawed, and why that would be.

  • I don't subscribe to conspiracy theories. However, I've no objection to dissent. With regard to what you've said "dissent can be one of the most patriotic voices" we're in agreement. I work with the legal system every day, and the fact is that the law goes to great lengths to protect residents and citizens in the United States. People ask why there are so many laws? They're to protect the people, not to screw them over. Anybody who disagrees quite simply doesn't understand our system of law.

  • @NDNPolice "paranoid conspiracy theorists imbeciles"? I used to think the same thing until I woke up.

  • Until you woke up, or until they (the conspiracy theorists) convinced you?

  • Comment removed

  • Ok. Although your comment is entirely vague. Precisely what are you referring to? Indeed there are those from the political arena who do not represent their constituents properly, and those individuals will be removed and replaced with someone else who does. Other than that, what are you referring to? Let's keep things within the realm of reality and/or realistic possibility.

  • She could also have said: "Are we on the record?" The judge made it clear that she was. She could have said:" On and for the record I am a beneficiary of the trust. I appoint you as my trustee and I want you to dismiss the charges against me and clear the record. I also want $5000 in redemption." That's from a retired judge. They know they're defacto. No jusrisdiction unless you volunteer it.

  • then step up and protect your rights. That's partially how I was able to dismiss a case against me where I was facing a $10,000 fine and 9 months in jail. That and the $1000 sigbond I signed properly (without liability) as per UCC 3-402 Notes 1 and 2. Look it up. And if you don't believe that you are a agent for represented party take a magnifying glass and look at the signature line of one of the personal checks in your NAME. Learn to sign your name without liability and the nightmare is over.

  • Ivy was not actually "re-presenting" herself. How can one re-present one's self? She was "without counsel" or "in want to competent counsel". If you go into court in a representative capacity the judge presumes that you are competent to act as your own attorney. This is why if the judge asks: "Are you representing yourself?" and you say yes, you get screwed because if you do or say one thing not congruent with what an attorney would the judge doesn't care. Without counsel the judge must...

  • Many countries be-head, whip, cane, torture, murder and/or imprison people without a trial. NO trial whatsoever! In fact, if you were in any of those countries, you wouldn't even be permitted to leave the comment you left to which im responding. Dictator owns the military, they answer only to him. No police, no system of law to hold the guilty accountable. It seems as if you misunderstand the meaning of liberty. Liberty doesn't mean NO gov. It means minimal gov. Enough to maintain liberty.

  • You call this minimal government? Arresting someone when there was NO INJURED PARTY? Sorry for caps, not yelling just emphasizing. Also, the logic you use comparing us to other countries is fallacious. Just because one piece of crap is prettier they're both still... well, sh*tty.

  • Unless you have scene the original arrest report or case file you do not know the precise circumstances of the case. I have not seen either of the two nor do i have any desire to. However, driving under suspended is only a violation for 1st offense in the state of NH and does not become a class B misdemeanor until the 2nd offense. Due to fact that the defendant has been charged with a class A misdemeanor, one can speculate that there's probably more to the case than you are aware of.