At 5.00. This is a hoax interview. It is impossible that a normal men talk with a brown shirt when you are over 65 years old. Look carefully the hands of this men. In a normal situation the camera would never film the expression of this men. Every word he say was tell to him by a earphone. This guy never talk for real. Look carefully his shirt. All the interview and the documentary isd a huge Hoax.
You need to watch the end of that clip to see the MONKEY BUSINESS! But you'll just dust it off the cognitive dissonance of your mind, claiming it all looks just okey dokey!
You PAN's cling to radiation-proof test pilots like children do to Santa!
@smogmontser And if they didn't go up, then how did they fake zero gravity? Vomit Comet. Stop armchair wanking your mouth off, and do some research. Apollo zero gravity clips were 30 some odd seconds long. The same amount of time the vomit rocket can create zero-gravity rides. What a coinky-dink eh?
@daro2096 Listen to the transmissions during launch. If that's the sound of a human voice speaking during the launch of a SATURN V, then Ohio also has beautiful ocean front property for sale!
These two videos make my case perfectly. Not only do you get a chance to hear the astronuts themselves tell you how LOUD and INTENSE the vibration of the Saturn V was, you get to compare the realism of the voice transmissions alongside those of actual launches of shuttles. The first video will confirm that Alan Shepards launch was a load of shit as well, and the reason they stopped putting a camera on fakenauts during launch!
@smogmontser And yet of those over 200 times of these supposed successful flights you speak of, not one DOCUMENTED FLIGHT available for public perusal. Your propaganda falls on knowing eyes here bub!
that was funny .....didnt make a lick of sense.....how do you explain the lunar jaxa photos of the landing sites? hoaxer's are sooooo wasting their time ......kinda sad their so WRONG FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL LOL
About the sound levels, isn't space a vacuum ? Therefore there would be no sound from the rocket engine at all, even if it were an inch away as sound only travels through air. I'd imagine there would be some vibrations but the engine looked fairly removed from the cabin section and most likely would have been insulated by some anti vibration bearing or something? I dunno, not sold on every point about the moon hoax here.
@MrEnterthehole "not sold on every point about the moon hoax "
Which point did sell you? You must have figured out it's a load of shit or you wouldn't be 'wondering' so....
The radiation issue alone is the nail in the Apollo Fairy Tale bullshit....Period. If they can't safely travel into cislunar space today, you can bet your ass they weren't able to back in the late '60's for christs sake!
@un4g1v3n1 I am convinced that some of the images put forward by NASA aren't genuine, and the radiation issue is certainly a stumper as I understand it. I just don't think every piece of moon mission debunking is accurate. :) The fact that forged imagery
is presented does put the rest of the released "case" into question but doesn't necessarily mean men didn't go there at some point. Great thought provoking subject though, where-ever you stand on it.
it has enough thrust to light 2 men and its own weight off the ground but not enough to make even a slight indentation in the thick dust? not enough to push dust onto the footpads? bullshit. either faked photos or faked mission.
@Hodson2000 The Russians never criticized the US for Nuking innocent women and children in JAPAN either now did they? The Russians are so dependable for criticism over US atrocities now aren't they?
At 4:10 Ralph Rene' says "the LM had one engine." Now he is dead so we will never know how he could make such a colossal error.
The LM had TWO engines, one for descent and one for ascent.
At 5:10 Kaysing says the exhaust should be visible. He could have examined the exhaust from his own car - completely transparent. He is dead but his incorrect and misleading statements are still left uncorrected here on YouTube.
lol! They're using artistic interpretations as "evidence". They do know that artists tend to add drama to their drawings and more than likely wouldn't know anything about how much thrust would be needed to softly touch down on the moon don't then? Also, I am finishing a degree in acoustics and I would guess that since the engine would only be running at a fraction of its full thrust and it is likely that they had good acoustic shielding that interior noise would have been at a minimal.
@ChrisJS1987 Delude yourself all you want Chris buddy...I prefer reality. Realistically speaking, the Apollo Fairy Tale is for adults, like Santa is for kids. It was nothing more than a mass mind experiment, that only still works on those ignorant of basic facts, and incapable of basic logic. If you need your fairy tales so be it. Not everyone can handle the truth. Their fragile egos, and minds cannot take the fact they were hoodwinked!
@un4g1v3n1 I honestly don't think I'm deluded... I'm just saying that artists representations can't really stand up as evidence. If you imagine a court room, there is an innocent guy in the stand being accused of whatever. The guy says "I didn't commit the crime" then the lawyer replies "But our artists drew a picture of you committing this crime". My point is, anyone can draw a picture and without proper info, the pictures have gaps that are creatively filled in. I'm just saying weak evidence!
@ChrisJS1987 Well, you can think your not deluding yourself all you want. I've been to the NGDC, and seen the major solar flares, and hundreds of solar flares recorded during Apollo mission dates. I've read Van Allens data on the intensity of the VAB's. I've read the RADIOACTIVE MOON articles, describing the dangerous secondary radiation that comes right up from the surface of the moon as solar and gamma radiation strikes it. I've read the data on KILLER ELECTRONS from magnetic storms.
@un4g1v3n1 It seems everything you read was incorrect and wrong. "KILLER ELECTRONS from magnetic storms" are a myth, electrons can easily be stopped, they are called beta radiation. And the Moon is not radioactive, Apollo 11 measured the radiation and it was zero.
@ChrisJS1987 By refusing to accept the basic facts of SPACE and the deadly radiation awaitng the unwary traveller, you are DELUDING YOURSELF. Goofgle: Radioactive Moon, Killer Electrons, Space radiation shielding research. Ask yourself how NASA could have gone BACKWARDS technologically, and exploratively....If we were on the moon in the sixties, we'd have hotels on the motherfucker by now. Use your goddamned basic logic skills, and common fucking sense man!
@un4g1v3n1 I've looked at most of that stuff man! Not the radioactive moon but I will look at it when I get a chance. But Van Allen himself Stated that humans could safely pass through it with no problems. When I first started looking into this stuff I leaned towards the hoax theories and thought that there was no way that we could get there. But after all of the evidence I've seen in favour of the hoax I've got to say, I feel that most of the hoax theories just don't have any merit.
NASA's evidence is NOT ONLY WEAK....It's either MISSSING...telemetry....Or flawed..FILM AND VIDEO WITH ODDITIES SO NUMEROUS, and dumb ass can find a new one!
Now, if you wish to speak honestly, and look at this with EYES WIDE OPEN, I'd be glad to continue discussing it. If you are going to continue to avoid the basic evidence, provided here in this video, then I know you have no such intentions! PERIOD!
You know, no one ever seems to remark on how the LEM landing is shown straight on, I mean lined up at an exact kite shaped diagonal, and it lifts directly up from that position. This is an artificial staging alignment. Any photographer would angle himself to get all 4 feet in the picture. This is a straight on shot, artificial looking.
@beastshawnee It was due to I think 8 rods that hold the lem to the descent stage. They were designed to release explosive bolts at different times depending on the angle of the terrain to ensure that the lem went straight up and didn't launch into the wrong orbit.
@ed11561 That is just the outer skin and not the pressure bubble. the outer skin was just there to deflect heat. it didn't need to be perfectly seamless as this would have purely been aesthetics and would have served no real purpose. And due to the fact there is no atmosphere, It could easily travel at 17,000 MPH with no problem. The LEM was purely about one thing, doing the job it was designed for and doing it well.
@ChrisJS1987 You are truly delusional....No doubt about it after this here comment. Can't even use your own eyes....Logic is lost on you....Sight is lost on you....Common sense is lost on you. Go back to basic physics class, and start again at Zero....
@un4g1v3n1 I was about to say I'm not trying to personally attack you and I do wish to discuss further on this subject but now I'm going to say this. You are needlessly angry to anything that doesn't fit into your personal view and it appears to be you who is narrow minded, short sighted and delusional. I was willing to have an actual debate about it. You know, a CIVILISED debate! But forget it. Enjoy your delusion! :)
@ChrisJS1987 Wow...at least troll with some originality...When you decide to open your eyes, and learn about space, you'll finally awaken from your Apollo Fairy Tales!
@un4g1v3n1 You make it sound like some dodgy cult religion! Not good man! So basically what you are saying is When you open your eyes and believe what I believe... Then I'll listen! :S Fair enough. Last comment here...
Has anyone noticed that all the apollo missions happened during the presidency of a guy named "TRICKY DICK" NIXON, AND it was in the middle of a WAR called VIET NAM when we were CARPET BOMBING the shit out of yellow people in VietNam,Laos&Cambodia.(the last 2 SECRETLY)
Now what could take the minds off a merciless killing spree of the good ole USA & make the country GREAT again?? A FAKE MOON LANDING.2 many getting killed in asia?Smoke&Mirrors=SOLUTION.USA is great once more? HORSESHIT KILLERS
@ed11561 Great point, I argue to incorporate this paper president Nixon into a debate and the G-Trolls dismissed it as being obsolete?? WTF??!! Dude was a fucking lying ass crook. But then finally their comeback is, "It wasn't Nixon who started it, it was Kennedy. Nixon hated Kennedy, why would he continue with something that was fake that Kennedy started?" What?! Kennedy was assassinated and one of the reasons was probably he didn't want to fake the space race, lol!
@GUARDIANtrooper lol MoonTards are delusional.Not us.Anything & everything about Apollo was a HOAX-a FRAUD just like all the wars the USA starts to capture foreign lands & resources. Screw them.
I'm not at YT to make friends and socialize. I do that in real life. I'm here to watch videos, and if I feel so inclined, to comment. So I'll watch your videos. I expect they'll further strengthen my beliefs as most Apollo hoax videos do. But I'll give you the benefit of doubt for the moment. Regardless, you will have to go a long way to convince me that Apollo could have been faked without the Russians knowing about it. I just don't believe our gov't is as infallible as you seem to think.
lol anyone who beleives in the moon landing is a moron. its been proven beyond doubt that the aluminum sheilding used on the lem and all apollo craft would have intensified the radiation within the space capsules. apollo is total hogwash.
@fleafrier1 Well, if you would take the time to research the ongoing endeavors to find adequate shielding for REAL expeditions into RADIATION-LADEN space, you would find that answer for yourself. But, like most the sheep in this world, you trust the dogs biting at your heels, leading you to ignorance!
Or am I wrong? Do you question authorities, or accept what they tell you without using your own mind and common sense as a compass to truth?
@un4g1v3n1 Got a link or any real info? I question everyone who makes a claim. Including you. Seems to me you don't have any real answer other than an attempt to cater to my paranoia. Interestingly ironic that you also then encourage me to exercise common sense. Dude. They're watching you.
@fleafrier1 "Seems to me you don't have any real answer other than an attempt to cater to my paranoia" And you try to insinuate I'm paranoid? Your funny, in a troll, been at YT for three years with no friends, videos, subscribers, or nothing to show for your time here? We both know this must be a sockpuppet account for another PAN trying to appear neutral. GIve it a rest. You want real answers. My videos will educate you about space radiation, unrealistic voice transmissions during launch
cont..Lies by Armstrong and Collins saying they were unable to see stars on the moon, or in space blown out of the water. Unrealistic, jerky, puppeteer movements by astronuts, spotlights on the moon, pictures of astronuts standing in spotlit areas, with fall-off lighting, astronuts making weird claims like, they didn't think they went far enough to encounter the Van Allen Belts, Alan Bean, Don't deserve recognition, Armstrong's veiled confession. And they go on and on....
@un4g1v3n1 I've watched 5 of your videos now and so far I still think you only raise vague questions but offer no real evidence. By my calculations, Apollo astronauts spent about half the time in the Van Allen belts needed to cause concern to OSHA. I've not yet found any evidence that aluminum increases this effect as you claim. The measure of your character seems to come across in your video productions. You do say fuck a lot. It does not strengthen your argument.
@fleafrier1 "I've not yet found any evidence that aluminum increases this effect as you claim watch?"
v=6aWUa5l_WNs Start at the 54 minute mark and listen to a radiation expert blow your BS out of the water. Now, if you listen to her, and wish to continue polluting my videos with your lies, it will be adios biatch. Today is the last day of wasting another minute on PAN trolls. Anyone with half-a-mind, adequate hearing, working eyeballs, and courage to see truth, already see this fraud!
@fleafrier1 Real info? Lies, deceptions, and missing proof. That's all NASA has to offer. Why don't you go to my channel and read, or even take the challenge I've put forth to astro/solar physicists? You want to explain why NASA would lie in the Apollo Biological reports about there being no major solar particle events, when all you have to do is go to the NGDC and see the major solar flares recorded there for your damn self? All you have done thus far is spew nonsense. Got Proof?
@un4g1v3n1 I've watched more of your videos. One of them is just some animated superhero looking broad asking questions about apollo. No credentials, no real evidence, nothing but vague questions.. I've spent the last two hours looking up anything I could find on radiation exposure to apollo flights. Everything I've seen indicates that your claims are baseless. Hoax theorists remind me of a James Brown song: You're just talkin loud and sayin nothin.
@fleafrier1 Generalizations, and mockery. Is that the entire stockpile of your ammunition. I mean besides your lies, and incapacity to use your mind in a critical thinking manner!
Once you listen to ELEANOR BLAKELY, (SPACE RADIATION and SHIELDING EXPERT) and then continue to believe in Apollo Fairy Tales, I'm afraid there is no hope for you! This video itself should have awakened you, but it seems you cling to Apollo like an infant clings to it's blanket!
@fleafrier1 Have you gone to the NGDC and looked up the specifics of the MAJOR SOLAR FLARES during Apollo mission dates? Have you seen the lies in the APOLLO BIOLOGICAL REPORT, and mirrored on JAY WINDLEY's bullshit site? When one takes off their delusional blinders, and look at the facts, the only thing remaining is a huge sesspool of lies, deceptions, and milli vanilli astronuts!
@un4g1v3n1 It took a while but I looked at NGDC data, and when matching mission dates it looks like there was a little H-alpha flare activity during apollo 10 & 12, but it was negligible during other missions. Had they flown in August of 72, however, it would have been a different story. There was a huge flare at that time. But they didn't fly. That was between apollo 16 & 17. My conclusions so far? NASA & the astronauts knew the risks, accepted them, went on with the missions, and got lucky.
@fleafrier1 Ah, the good ole disinformational bullshit I've come to expect from lying, deceptive fucking PANs the world over. There were multiple MAJOR SOLAR FLARES during all but one Apollo mission. And some WHOPPERS occurred while around, and supposedly on the moon. Live your delusion somewhere else PAN boy!
I've let your lies stand long enough!
Blocked, ignored, history, just like your Apollo Fairy Tale. Into the sphere of the tooth fairy, and santy claus!
@un4g1v3n14:48=plume... look at the liquidators of Chernobyl if you want to talk radiation survival... absence of noise ... gee what is sound? what medium does it propagate in? oh...air.... yes their is air in the cabin but none around so it wont sound the same as earth and Plantronics did their job right and the audio bandwidth of ssb isnt great. as for wild landing craft, the moons gravity is way lower and no wind shear, gives you multiple seconds more to react and adjust
@Wuety06 You know what...No amount of common sense, or intelligent understanding of radiation in space is going to help you now. You've decided to stick with your Apollo Fairy tales, like a child continues to believe in the tooth fairy cause their momma keeps putting quarters under their pillow.
Happy Apollo Fairy Tale dreams to you. Your Milli Vanilli astronuts appreciate your ignorance and blind faith!
@Wuety06 Which is it? Is the gravity much lower or just slightly different compared to earth? You people can't make up your minds on this issue. You apply your gravity statements when it is convenient for you in this HOAX. I will never understand why you people just keep fighting this bullshit lie when the evidence is sooooo overwhelming, lol!! The LEM landed flawlessly on the moon-set compared to the disaster crash and burn of Neil Armstrong on earth, too perfect, what a joke to debate...
@GUARDIANtrooper real numbers, i'll let you decide much or slightly. Free fall acceleration on the moon is 1.6m/s/s - earth is 9.8m/s/s. It fell 6.1 times slower than it would on earth. for the record if you reread my post i say "way lower". your counter argument based on much vs slightly is pointless because either way it was almost flyable on earth...slightly is all it would take, give it 6x the time for corrections and you get flawless. I seriously hope you were trolling
@un4g1v3n1 I happen to be a nuclear physicist. And I tell you, you are wrong. "There were multiple MAJOR SOLAR FLARES during all but one Apollo mission." Totally incorrect.
@toffeetigerkimba Obvious eh? There are six well-documented (Apollo Lunar Surface Journal) landings on the Moon and three fly-bys, the astronauts are well known and their pictures on the Moon are in the ALSJ (google it!).
The guys who landed took parts af the Moon back with them, half a ton of lunar rocks.
How do you account for 24 astronauts going to the moon, 3 of them twice? Not so obvious!
The Moon landings really happened, look at the pictures and read the transcripts on the ALSJ.
So how did every single lunar module land PERFECTLY on the surface of the moon,with NO blast crater,not one speck of dust or dirt on the modules "feet", and how come so many still photos were doctored to change their effect? (look it up)
@toffeetigerkimba "So how did every single lunar module land PERFECTLY on the surface of the moon,with NO blast crater" The gravity was only 1/6 th Earth gravity and they came in slow at low engine power. But as you can hear on the Apollo 11 landing, Buzz Aldrin is commenting "[we are] kicking up some dust."
No still photos were ever doctored. The original developed film cassettes are on Apollo Lunar Surface Journal.
@BjornPalmen You aren't a nuclear phsyicist, your a goddamned liar! Even lying assholes can go to the NGDC and look up the major solar flares during Apollo mission dates. But we both know all you are is a lazy fucking PAN troll, who has no interest in truth! Don't we?
@BjornPalmen Hey dipshit, take a look at the video with the radiation expert Eleanor Blakely....She specifically mentions that aluminum makes the radiation within the craft more dangerous than on the outside due to fragmentation! You truly are a PAN moron aren't you now?
@stalkervision "What these Pan's doesn't realize is a whole lot of people at the time of apollo thought it was bogus and didn't believe it was real."
Yes, they KNEW it was a fraud! Believing is for PANS! They need a GOD to believe in, and Apollo is the perfect one! Being a pedophile GOD, APOLLO was the one mythical god PAN's can really relate to!
@stalkervision The final nails on the Apollo Fairy Tale Coffin were hammered in long before the Apollo Truth Movement here on You Tube! It's just interesting to see how many more people still delude themselves about it. I guess even adults need a Santa Claus to believe in!
@stalkervision You should see how they scurry to their PANtard websites in search of new lies to tell. I think trolls may be misnamed. They are more like rats. When their ship of lies starts sinking, they abandon the ship of their nic, and start a new one.
I have a lunar conspiracy theory of my own. Mine is that the US government blew 20 billion dollars over 10+ years and pushed the aerospace, computing, electronics, metallurgy and bio-medicine industries of that country so far forward that they have maintained a lead which they largely hold to this day, and in the process achieved the single greatest feat of mankind and international kudos whilst making their opponents look like amateurs.
Theres your conspiracy, simple isnt it. Dickheads.
apart from writing stupid comments on peoples home pages your still pushing this shit in a hope some will stick right?
films of a LEM not at the end of its development in gravity and dealing with air, compared to complete LEM in 1/6Th grave and no air, you may as well be picking faults with Artists dramatic representations of Luna landings, right?
@Ashmansworth i dont get the lem conspiracy at all. The simulator crashed. So what. Three american astronauts crashed and died in T38s during apollo or gemini. Is there some conspiracy there as well? One died in an automobile accident. Does that mean the lunar rover should not work because things with wheels obviously kill astronauts?
@un4g1v3n1 Explain the LEM conspiracy. What is the conspiracy? The simulator crashes on a training flight on earth therefore it cant possibly work on the moon? What is it.
Breakdown: Three LEM trainers were crashed. There is not one unedited, successful flight of the LEM trainer to be found ANYWHERE. It has no ROCKET shape to it. They took weight off, loaded weight on, and yet we hear nothing about balancing the load. No technical manuals to explain how the farking thing worked. Paper thin aluminum walls you could stick your finger through. We are supposed to believe they were strong enough to hold a pressurized atmosphere. Not one video of them entering!!
pt2. Jim Collier took a cherry picker, and went up to measure the LEM doorway. Found out there was no way a suited astronaut could fit through it. Now, instead of listening to some crazy hoax head like me, why don't you listen to the words of an astronaut the first time he saw the LEM (prop)!
watch?v=qGaKcjibbgY Bean, Armstrong, and others pipe in!
With enough time a person could think of a conspiratorial connection with all ten thousand people involved with the Luna landings, but as evidence suggests there is a lot of people out there with too much time on there hands.
That USA used German expertise to build big rockets, isn't more strange than that USSR did exactly the same. Morale wasn't a big issue during the cold war. And, it still isn't in political reality.
Also, the same old lie about a "LEM prototype" crashing is popping up again here. Total ignorance or a deliberate lie?
Wait, you mean to say that they overlooked such trivial details?! I am shocked. I mean... so amateur, what is up with that? They must have been in a real hurry or it never occured to them that one day in the near future people will get smarter and more critical... lol. Still, what about the hammer and feather drop? And the astronauts do look like they move in a micro gravity environment..
jesus fucking christ in a chicken basket, after watching i know who wanted to fake the moon mission. Armstrong did. problem is he could have just quite nasa and gone back to flying safe planes. and saved his what? sole? reputation? hes a mason those mean nothing.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Notice that they have never participated in any debate whatsoever.If you doubt them they just run away.This silent absence is another loud proof.If me or you were real astronauts who been on the Moon ,no one would even dream to talk about hoax.I would take them out to TV debates and if fail to convince them I would sue them.-No messing!
@potrodsas You would think that Jarrah, Rene, Kaysing, Collier, Jack White, Sibrel, myself, and all the other moon hoax advocates would have been taken to court for slander/libel by NASA if what we were saying was all untrue. And yet, here the moon hoax strengthens in both it's evidence, and amount of 'believers'.
Come on NASA, if we are so full of crap, where's the lawsuit? How dare we sully the reputation of an Agency first headed by an Ardent, SS, NAZI officer, killer of jews? PEACE!
@un4g1v3n1 T. Keith Glennan was a university president when selected as NASA's first administrator, and he was American born. In your zeal to associate NASA with Hitler, you seem to want to elevate Werner von Braun to a position he never held - he was never the head of NASA, and he certainly wan't the first administrator. Even so, I was unaware of the physical principle that designs by former Nazis cannot function as desired. Is that Newton's elusive fourth law?
@roamingcroat Virtue and conscience. Not only something missing from our government, and it's organizations, but obviously from your thought processes! It's the elusive, you have none, if you think placing ardent NAZI's in positions of power, to create rockets, and experiment on American citizens minds is hunky fucking dory!
I have no zeal for associating NASA with Hitler...The CIA and Truman decided to do that when they came up with Project Paperclip, and decided to reward ARDENT NAZIs.
part 2. That you cannot figure out the horrendous mistake of allowing hundreds and hundreds of NAZI propulsion scientists, and MIND scientists into the US, after killing, torturing, and experimenting on JEWS, shows that you are not only stupid enough to believe it's all good, but that you have no sense of justice within your being. Rather sad, that you cannot figure that out for yourself!
@un4g1v3n1 The politics and morality of bringing Nazi scientists to work on US projects has no bearing whatsoever on the facts of the Moon landing. Hitler himself could have designed the Saturn V; it would not affect the validity of the landings. You appeal to emotion by bringing up von Braun's Nazi past, but that hasn't got a thing to do with the facts of the Moon landing. But its apparent that you want to discredit the achievement by making pointless and inaccurate statements about NASA.
@roamingcroat The difference between Hitler and the United States, is that Hitler used V2's with conventional explosives. The US arms their ICBM's with nuclear warheads. And the US proved they were more than willing to use them on civilian targets.
The moonlanding was a hoax, and the fact that you can look at Apollo photos, or watch videos of them being jerked around by wires on the moon, just proves that you are an idiot! Sorry, but that's the fact jack!
@un4g1v3n1 OK, Hitler is still irrelevant to the Moon landing, so I have nothing to say about your first paragraph.
As for the landings, I have yet to see any rational reason why the landings would have been faked, and I have yet to see any analysis that proves (or even demonstrates) there are wires attached to the astronauts. The closest hoaxers come to that is showing videos with unusual movements and saying "wires!" over and over again. Show me wires were needed for those movements with math
@roamingcroat Really? Nothing to say about the US, and Hitler being okay with killing people with rockets? Nothing? I guess you could give a shit who is killling people, or how they are doing it right?
If you would get off your lazy ass, go to my main channel page, and go to the links I have provided for lazy asses like yourself, you can get a clue. See the lies about major solar flares. See programs which explain the DEADLY amounts of radiation in the VAB's and beyond.
@un4g1v3n1 It is not relevant to the facts of Apollo. I am not here to discuss the second World War.
I've seen some of your other videos, and I've heard most, if not all, of your claims. I specifically commented here because of your statement that either a) T. Keith Glennan was a Nazi or b) Werner von Braun was the first NASA administrator. Neither is true. And I think it's indicative of the way you do your research.
@roamingcroat I've seen some of your other videos, and I've heard most, if not all, of your claims. I specifically commented here because of your statement that either a) T. Keith Glennan was a Nazi or b) Werner von Braun was the first NASA administrator. Neither is true. And I think it's indicative of the way you do your research.
What this is indicative of is your inability to refute what my vidoes claim. Instead you decided to use diversion of a fact that is nothing more than semantics!
@roamingcroat I've seen some of your other videos, and I've heard most, if not all, of your claims. I specifically commented here because of your statement that either a) T. Keith Glennan was a Nazi or b) Werner von Braun was the first NASA administrator. Neither is true. And I think it's indicative of the way you do your research.
What this is indicative of is your inability to refute what my vidoes claim. Instead you decided to use diversion of a fact that is nothing more than semantics!
@roamingcroat pt2. Here's your research: In 1960, his rocket development center transferred from the Army to the newly established NASA and received a mandate to build the giant Saturn rockets. Accordingly, von Braun became director of NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center and the chief architect of the Saturn V launch vehicle, the superbooster that would propel Americans to the Moon.
@roamingcroat pt 2 Von Braun also became one of the most prominent spokesmen of space exploration in the United States during the 1950s. In 1970, NASA leadership asked von Braun to move to Washington, D.C., to head up the strategic planning effort for the agency. He left his home in Huntsville, Ala., but in 1972 he decided to retire from NASA and work for Fairchild Industries of Germantown, Md. He died in Alexandria, Va., on June 16, 1977.
@toocoolforu I guess it's kind of difficult for idiots to fathom the political, social, and just reasons why ardent NAZI, killer of the five slowest jews everyday, doesn't deserve TIMES man of the YEAR, but rather a noose around his neck after a swift trial for his crimes! Is being that stupid difficult? Do you have to work at being so ignorant. Do you have to get plenty of extra mercury-laden vaccinations to live in the kind of denial you reside in? Or are you just another damn moron troll?
@un4g1v3n1 What a moronic comment. Times magazine also made Stalin and Hitler as man of the year, again, Whats your point ??? No one gives a shit that you don't like Von Braun! He wasn't even a "ardent nazi" as you like to think. Yeah, nazi germany was so evil booh booh, and the good americans were angels. What a nice fantasy world you live in.
@un4g1v3n1 and the russians used german scientists as well. The problem was there werent as smart as ours. So im guessing soviet/serbian appologists like yourself are shit out of luck.
@roamingcroat pt3 So tell me again how the facts of Apollo are not relevant to the facts that they used WWII ardent NAZI rocket and mind scientists in our military industrial complex, space programs, and universities, psychiatric hospitals all over the US? War criminals given high paying, jobs within some of the most delicate, top-secret operations of great interest to the US public, since their tax dollars were footing the bill! Tell me again, how those facts are IRRELEVANT?
@un4g1v3n1 how are they relevant to a hoax. In fact the reinforce a success rather than a hoax. If you are trying to win you use the best, no matter how much you may not like to use the services of those people for other reasons. The cold war was a WAR. You are too young to remember obviously sonny but just because there was no direct superpower conflict did not mean that winning was not everything....
@un4g1v3n1 "Wires" ?? You mean "radio antennas" ? Again, debunking lies you saw and heard on idiotic websites. Time to study math and history my friend, unless they're meant to control you either lol. Booh booh the US ICBMs were filled with A-bombs ?? You realize Nazis would have done the same if they had the Bomb I hope. Who said Americans were all innocents ? BTW H-bombs were dropped by B-52 not ICBM. The MAD politic probably saved us all too. Bombs are slowly recycled now... How old are you ?
IT's not my footage. NASA's! My footage would have included hundreds of UNEDITED test flights from different angles, including onboard of pilot, to prove that I had a reliable craft for radiation-proof test pilots to land on the HIGHLY IRRADIATED moon, while they were being hit by micormeteorites, Solar Radiation, Gamma Rays, as well as the secondary radiation spraying up at them form their very feet!
You see, anyone who knows the reality of the cislunar space environment knows it was a sham!
@worldwidedownload Wrong, guess you missed the video of the Shuttle ABOVE our atmosphere, proving your disinformation completely wrong! Nice try though....I guess you'll have to go back to baut and find their pat excuse for that one...Debunk fail yet again! Besides the fact that within the LEM an atmosphere is created within which sound waves will CARRY SOUND. Is that too much for you to understand? I suggest immediate removal of the portion of your brain that buys into the Apollo lies!
@un4g1v3n1 I guess I did. You can see in your own footage that the LEM has very little or no plume in Earths atmosphere so did you really expect to see one on the moon. You'd be able to feel the engine sounds/vibrations but with the heat sheild and sound proofing little would be picked up by the mic. Maybe you could help me replace that part of my brain by convincing me with some evidence.
@un4g1v3n1 About the sound of the LEM : You have to realize that the sound of a rocket engine comes from the fire plume, not from the engine. If you think this is too weird for your funny brain, listen to space shuttle outer space thrusts, they make only vibrations and tiny sound. Unless you think the ISS is fake too :D
@toocoolforu I guess it's too funny for your little brain to understand how vibrations change the sound of your voice! Do you believe in shuttle missions? Yes? Now watch watch?v=v1c6ktHYO-I The use of common sense, and one's own ears is all it takes to spot this fake. I guess some people, with their funnyk brains, just prefer to fool themselves, and allow their tax dollars to be stolen from them for bullshit! Welcome to the prison of your own delusional mind pal!
@un4g1v3n1 I think it's sad that you keep denying that the space age is begun. I don't see your goal by disclaiming the Apollo missions, that was an amazing human progress. Facts are facts, you find any possible anomaly you believe false and jump into absurdly conclusions. That's funny indeed that engineers around the world would hide such things, no later than 30 minutes ago a french spacecraft was launched to supply the ISS, guess that's fake too according to you! People like you are sad.
Van Allens original research in the AUG '59 Scientific American, pointed out that the belts are a sea of deadly radiation and that all missions through them will have to be unmanned until sufficient shielding is developed. And Van Allen is dead, so agreement is impossible...His research stands as his comment on the belts...
And your comment about radiologists is so wrong I don't know where to start. You ask those in the radiation treatment medical field if they believe in Apollo!!!
Van Allen never said that manned missions through the belts are not possible and he spent his last years rebutting all those silly "deadly radiation" claims.
@blablubb12345 Have you read the Scientific American Article...YES OR NO!
Watch some science programs about space and wake up...
Start here...I've highllighted the many claims of DEADLY RADIATION WITHIN AND BEYOND THE VAB's so you don't have to watch the entire programs..but you should. You might come out of your Apollo Coma.
watch?v=Bqv4q35QqUg
Watch and educate yourself...continue lying and troll spamming my vid and gonzo pal!
@5678APFELMUS Ya, I know...I'm trying to give the benefit of doubt...Plus I have my 12 days of Christmas ban lifting on the 13th...If the banned trolls behave appropriately, they can stay...If not...it's just a matter of pushing a button...
LEM is the stupidest and less believable equipment showed on moon landing movies. It is so full of non-sense and non-technical issued... NOTE: even today the landing techniques used to lenad rovers on alien plantes are not AT ALL based on LEM technology, but with jumping balloons (with risks of damaging equipments), like on recent mission to Mars. LEM technology has never been used in any other missions on alien landings even in case of simply probes.
ALL unmanned landings on the moon were "powered landings" like the LM did. It's the only way to land in a vacuum. The Mars landers Viking 1 and 2 and Phoenix also landed on engine power. Maybe you should wonder why no aviation or space engineer agrees with you.
@blablubb12345 You should go take a look at one of the LM's in the musuem. You can poke your finger through the skin of the thing. To believe that it was capable of holding a pressurized atmosphere to sustain life is nothing short of idiocy!
India plans to launch Chandrayaan-2 in 2013, including a lander provided by the Russian space agency. I strongly hope that we are still alive by then ;-)
@blablubb12345 Very funny! Please tell us all the technology that will allow them safe passage through the VAB's, into the deadly radiation within and beyond. Including the 4 billion years of irradiated Moon...Secondary Nuetron radiation coming up at them from their feet, as well as solar radiation/GCR's hitting them from all sides?
Please explain how in three short years India will overcome a problem, NASA, RUSSIA, and ESA have yet to solve!
Explain why the Apollo CM doesn't have enough shielding to fly to the moon! Explain why no radiologist or spaceflight engineer and even James van Allen agrees with you! And btw, i never said that China/India are planning manned flights to the moon.
@blablubb12345 If you continue to post lies, I will block you...
Last warning...
Metal, aluminum, steel..all terrible shielding as the solar particles, and other dangerous particular radiation will cause fragmentation increasing and lowering the speed of the secondary particles enough to stick in the skin of humans....Wave radiation such as Gamma Rays move right through all solid material...even lead...although it will lower the count...if there is enough!
As far as I know, there are no plans to visit the moon again. After more than 40 years, the Apollo 'holidays on the moon' still remain the only one of its kind outside earth orbit.. Since then, in all space programs, scientists are developing just "orbiting" activities with astronauts, that's all...... If you don't go along with the apollo hoax theory, movies, pictures and stuff, you should at least notice this evidence that something IS strange. Isn' it?
@1965christian Not to be an ass brother, but that is conjecture. Astrophysicists explaining there are several hundred million solar particles in every square inch of space, every SECOND, is fairly convincing evidence that the trip to the moon is impossible for human beings without proper shielding. Aluminum is not only not proper, but more dangerous due to secondary particles due to fragmentation.
Numerous other sources may be cited as well to support why the journey was impossible!!!
Look, I am not the one who will jump up and say for certain that the moon landing is a total fraud, although I have good reasons to think so. And I think so.
@1965christian As you rightly should brother...But I am the one who will jump up, raise my hand in a crowd, and tell people what the true nature of space is. Even though many will be too proud to listen, too ignorant to understand, and too impatient to hear me out, I'll continue to point out this fraud on and off the net!
India and China will send unmanned spacecraft to the moon, both containing a lander and a rover. Space Adventures and the russian space agency are planning manned trips to the moon with a Soyuz spacecraft, but without landing. Just a "Apollo 13 style" swing-by. And no, there isn't anything strange on the Apollo stuff.
Question: why unmanned spacecraft? Why India and China? Where is NASA? In the 60's NASA "landed on the moon" several times, and every time was a royal success. Landing in the moon 40 years ago was like taking the train to Yuma. Why now are they starting from stupid probes again? For what? Ask yourself. Find an answer by your self.
Why unmanned spacecraft? Well, china's manned spaceflight program is in it's early stages and India has still a long way to go. Why not NASA? They had a moon landing program until this year.
The main reason why the US or Russia don't fly to the Moon (manned) is the lack of a heavy lift rocket. Both, the Saturn V and Energia, were scrapped a long time ago and it would take a long time - and money - to build a new heavy launcher. After all, it IS money that's missing (or the political will, if you want).
@blablubb12345 Another LIE...You really need to stop....You've been warned...I
Science does not go backwards...Discovery does not recede....
If so, Europeans would have quit risking their ass on ships coming to the Americans after they were discovered...And the British wouldn't have fought the civil war...THe COST WOULD HAVE BEEN TOO MUCH!
The same question is: Why doesn't Europe have a manned spacecraft? It's all there, a descent launcher, a fully automated resupply ship for the ISS, several reentry test vehicles, astronauts and a training center, experience in building manned parts of space stations (spacelab, columbus, Node 2 and 3, cupola). It's just the lack of political will and without that, tere is no money to do such things.
This has been flagged as spam show
At 5.00. This is a hoax interview. It is impossible that a normal men talk with a brown shirt when you are over 65 years old. Look carefully the hands of this men. In a normal situation the camera would never film the expression of this men. Every word he say was tell to him by a earphone. This guy never talk for real. Look carefully his shirt. All the interview and the documentary isd a huge Hoax.
TheAlonetogether 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
QUE DIEU BLESSE L'AMÉRIQUE.
TheAlonetogether 3 days ago
You need to watch the end of that clip to see the MONKEY BUSINESS! But you'll just dust it off the cognitive dissonance of your mind, claiming it all looks just okey dokey!
You PAN's cling to radiation-proof test pilots like children do to Santa!
un4g1v3n1 1 month ago
@smogmontser And if they didn't go up, then how did they fake zero gravity? Vomit Comet. Stop armchair wanking your mouth off, and do some research. Apollo zero gravity clips were 30 some odd seconds long. The same amount of time the vomit rocket can create zero-gravity rides. What a coinky-dink eh?
un4g1v3n1 1 month ago
@un4g1v3n1
They stayed in low earth orbit the whole time.
daro2096 1 day ago
@daro2096 Listen to the transmissions during launch. If that's the sound of a human voice speaking during the launch of a SATURN V, then Ohio also has beautiful ocean front property for sale!
un4g1v3n1 1 day ago
@smogmontser watch?v=v1c6ktHYO-I
watch?v=V7ngE6sq2EM
These two videos make my case perfectly. Not only do you get a chance to hear the astronuts themselves tell you how LOUD and INTENSE the vibration of the Saturn V was, you get to compare the realism of the voice transmissions alongside those of actual launches of shuttles. The first video will confirm that Alan Shepards launch was a load of shit as well, and the reason they stopped putting a camera on fakenauts during launch!
un4g1v3n1 1 month ago
@smogmontser Guess you've never listened to fighter pilots or NASCAR drivers while they are piloting/driving their vehicles....
un4g1v3n1 1 month ago
@smogmontser And yet of those over 200 times of these supposed successful flights you speak of, not one DOCUMENTED FLIGHT available for public perusal. Your propaganda falls on knowing eyes here bub!
un4g1v3n1 1 month ago
that was funny .....didnt make a lick of sense.....how do you explain the lunar jaxa photos of the landing sites? hoaxer's are sooooo wasting their time ......kinda sad their so WRONG FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL LOL
7thsign68 2 months ago
@7thsign68
What proof exactly do they show? All I see are dark blobs in a sea of grey landscape. Could easily have been photoshopped in before release.
daro2096 1 day ago
About the sound levels, isn't space a vacuum ? Therefore there would be no sound from the rocket engine at all, even if it were an inch away as sound only travels through air. I'd imagine there would be some vibrations but the engine looked fairly removed from the cabin section and most likely would have been insulated by some anti vibration bearing or something? I dunno, not sold on every point about the moon hoax here.
MrEnterthehole 2 months ago
@MrEnterthehole "not sold on every point about the moon hoax "
Which point did sell you? You must have figured out it's a load of shit or you wouldn't be 'wondering' so....
The radiation issue alone is the nail in the Apollo Fairy Tale bullshit....Period. If they can't safely travel into cislunar space today, you can bet your ass they weren't able to back in the late '60's for christs sake!
un4g1v3n1 2 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 I am convinced that some of the images put forward by NASA aren't genuine, and the radiation issue is certainly a stumper as I understand it. I just don't think every piece of moon mission debunking is accurate. :) The fact that forged imagery
is presented does put the rest of the released "case" into question but doesn't necessarily mean men didn't go there at some point. Great thought provoking subject though, where-ever you stand on it.
MrEnterthehole 2 months ago
@MrEnterthehole
Even in a vacuum you would hear the vibrations of the rocket. The craft would be shaking at least. Their voices are too calm.
Plus that can not be footage from the moon. No radiation damage on the film.
daro2096 1 day ago
Is the moon really made of cheese?
SPOOKSTR 2 months ago
@SPOOKSTR
Apollo moon certainly!
hunchbacked 2 months ago
Watch the movie Capricorn One.
23ord 3 months ago
it has enough thrust to light 2 men and its own weight off the ground but not enough to make even a slight indentation in the thick dust? not enough to push dust onto the footpads? bullshit. either faked photos or faked mission.
MrToiletface 3 months ago
@MrToiletface Due to the radiation in space, it's FAKED MISSIONS! No doubt about it!
un4g1v3n1 3 months ago
@un4g1v3n1
I have no doubt about it.
hunchbacked 2 months ago
The Russians never, ever accused us of faking it. Case Closed, pinheads.
Hodson2000 4 months ago
@Hodson2000 The Russians never criticized the US for Nuking innocent women and children in JAPAN either now did they? The Russians are so dependable for criticism over US atrocities now aren't they?
Now, find another video to post dumb shit on!
un4g1v3n1 4 months ago
At 4:10 Ralph Rene' says "the LM had one engine." Now he is dead so we will never know how he could make such a colossal error.
The LM had TWO engines, one for descent and one for ascent.
At 5:10 Kaysing says the exhaust should be visible. He could have examined the exhaust from his own car - completely transparent. He is dead but his incorrect and misleading statements are still left uncorrected here on YouTube.
BjornPalmen 4 months ago
what im getting at watching this is that theres air in space? O.o
an1memaster300 4 months ago
@an1memaster300 And airheads pretending to be in space!
un4g1v3n1 4 months ago
aulis.com/jackstudies_4.html
NASA PHOTOS of the LM on the moon. ROTFLMFAO HAHAHAHAHAHA
we never went to the moon AND STILL CAN'T. LOL
ed11561 6 months ago
lol! They're using artistic interpretations as "evidence". They do know that artists tend to add drama to their drawings and more than likely wouldn't know anything about how much thrust would be needed to softly touch down on the moon don't then? Also, I am finishing a degree in acoustics and I would guess that since the engine would only be running at a fraction of its full thrust and it is likely that they had good acoustic shielding that interior noise would have been at a minimal.
ChrisJS1987 6 months ago
@ChrisJS1987 Delude yourself all you want Chris buddy...I prefer reality. Realistically speaking, the Apollo Fairy Tale is for adults, like Santa is for kids. It was nothing more than a mass mind experiment, that only still works on those ignorant of basic facts, and incapable of basic logic. If you need your fairy tales so be it. Not everyone can handle the truth. Their fragile egos, and minds cannot take the fact they were hoodwinked!
un4g1v3n1 6 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 I honestly don't think I'm deluded... I'm just saying that artists representations can't really stand up as evidence. If you imagine a court room, there is an innocent guy in the stand being accused of whatever. The guy says "I didn't commit the crime" then the lawyer replies "But our artists drew a picture of you committing this crime". My point is, anyone can draw a picture and without proper info, the pictures have gaps that are creatively filled in. I'm just saying weak evidence!
ChrisJS1987 6 months ago
@ChrisJS1987 Well, you can think your not deluding yourself all you want. I've been to the NGDC, and seen the major solar flares, and hundreds of solar flares recorded during Apollo mission dates. I've read Van Allens data on the intensity of the VAB's. I've read the RADIOACTIVE MOON articles, describing the dangerous secondary radiation that comes right up from the surface of the moon as solar and gamma radiation strikes it. I've read the data on KILLER ELECTRONS from magnetic storms.
un4g1v3n1 6 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 It seems everything you read was incorrect and wrong. "KILLER ELECTRONS from magnetic storms" are a myth, electrons can easily be stopped, they are called beta radiation. And the Moon is not radioactive, Apollo 11 measured the radiation and it was zero.
BjornPalmen 4 months ago
@ChrisJS1987 By refusing to accept the basic facts of SPACE and the deadly radiation awaitng the unwary traveller, you are DELUDING YOURSELF. Goofgle: Radioactive Moon, Killer Electrons, Space radiation shielding research. Ask yourself how NASA could have gone BACKWARDS technologically, and exploratively....If we were on the moon in the sixties, we'd have hotels on the motherfucker by now. Use your goddamned basic logic skills, and common fucking sense man!
un4g1v3n1 6 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 I've looked at most of that stuff man! Not the radioactive moon but I will look at it when I get a chance. But Van Allen himself Stated that humans could safely pass through it with no problems. When I first started looking into this stuff I leaned towards the hoax theories and thought that there was no way that we could get there. But after all of the evidence I've seen in favour of the hoax I've got to say, I feel that most of the hoax theories just don't have any merit.
ChrisJS1987 6 months ago
NASA's evidence is NOT ONLY WEAK....It's either MISSSING...telemetry....Or flawed..FILM AND VIDEO WITH ODDITIES SO NUMEROUS, and dumb ass can find a new one!
Now, if you wish to speak honestly, and look at this with EYES WIDE OPEN, I'd be glad to continue discussing it. If you are going to continue to avoid the basic evidence, provided here in this video, then I know you have no such intentions! PERIOD!
un4g1v3n1 6 months ago
You know, no one ever seems to remark on how the LEM landing is shown straight on, I mean lined up at an exact kite shaped diagonal, and it lifts directly up from that position. This is an artificial staging alignment. Any photographer would angle himself to get all 4 feet in the picture. This is a straight on shot, artificial looking.
beastshawnee 7 months ago
@beastshawnee It was due to I think 8 rods that hold the lem to the descent stage. They were designed to release explosive bolts at different times depending on the angle of the terrain to ensure that the lem went straight up and didn't launch into the wrong orbit.
ChrisJS1987 6 months ago
@ChrisJS1987 Yeah! That's right! That's why it wobbles as it goes up. That's why it looks totally fake.
beastshawnee 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
8:22 Come on Look at that THING! Lunar Lander? More like a leaky fake model.
That thing was supposed to be traveling thru space at 17,000 MPH? rotflmfaoh
It is a ridiculous poorly fabricated school project made out of cardboard&scotchtape with aluminum foil. lol
8:28 Even worse.
ed11561 7 months ago
8:22 Come on Look at that THING! Lunar Lander? More like a leaky fake model.
That thing was supposed to be traveling thru space at 17,000 MPH? rotflmfaoh
It is a ridiculous poorly fabricated school project made out of cardboard&scotchtape with aluminum foil. lol
ed11561 7 months ago
@ed11561 That is just the outer skin and not the pressure bubble. the outer skin was just there to deflect heat. it didn't need to be perfectly seamless as this would have purely been aesthetics and would have served no real purpose. And due to the fact there is no atmosphere, It could easily travel at 17,000 MPH with no problem. The LEM was purely about one thing, doing the job it was designed for and doing it well.
ChrisJS1987 6 months ago
@ChrisJS1987 You are truly delusional....No doubt about it after this here comment. Can't even use your own eyes....Logic is lost on you....Sight is lost on you....Common sense is lost on you. Go back to basic physics class, and start again at Zero....
un4g1v3n1 6 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 I was about to say I'm not trying to personally attack you and I do wish to discuss further on this subject but now I'm going to say this. You are needlessly angry to anything that doesn't fit into your personal view and it appears to be you who is narrow minded, short sighted and delusional. I was willing to have an actual debate about it. You know, a CIVILISED debate! But forget it. Enjoy your delusion! :)
ChrisJS1987 6 months ago
@ChrisJS1987 Wow...at least troll with some originality...When you decide to open your eyes, and learn about space, you'll finally awaken from your Apollo Fairy Tales!
un4g1v3n1 6 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 You make it sound like some dodgy cult religion! Not good man! So basically what you are saying is When you open your eyes and believe what I believe... Then I'll listen! :S Fair enough. Last comment here...
ChrisJS1987 6 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 Insults cannot save you. You are simply dead wrong. Chris is not delusional, but I think you are!
BjornPalmen 4 months ago
@ChrisJS1987 The LEM was purely about one thing, doing the job it was designed for and doing it well. BULLSHIT
Pressure bubble my ass.Don't you know when you are being SCAMMED? I guess not. hahaha
NASA PHOTO.....
aulis . com/jackstudies_4.html
AESTHETICS MY ASS. That is a fucking dog that don't hunt. lol
Wake the fuck up.YOU'VE BEEN HAD. HOAXED. SCAMMED. lol
ed11561 6 months ago
Has anyone noticed that all the apollo missions happened during the presidency of a guy named "TRICKY DICK" NIXON, AND it was in the middle of a WAR called VIET NAM when we were CARPET BOMBING the shit out of yellow people in VietNam,Laos&Cambodia.(the last 2 SECRETLY)
Now what could take the minds off a merciless killing spree of the good ole USA & make the country GREAT again?? A FAKE MOON LANDING.2 many getting killed in asia?Smoke&Mirrors=SOLUTION.USA is great once more? HORSESHIT KILLERS
ed11561 7 months ago
@ed11561 Great point, I argue to incorporate this paper president Nixon into a debate and the G-Trolls dismissed it as being obsolete?? WTF??!! Dude was a fucking lying ass crook. But then finally their comeback is, "It wasn't Nixon who started it, it was Kennedy. Nixon hated Kennedy, why would he continue with something that was fake that Kennedy started?" What?! Kennedy was assassinated and one of the reasons was probably he didn't want to fake the space race, lol!
GUARDIANtrooper 7 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper lol MoonTards are delusional.Not us.Anything & everything about Apollo was a HOAX-a FRAUD just like all the wars the USA starts to capture foreign lands & resources. Screw them.
ed11561 7 months ago
Comment removed
3nasafakedit 8 months ago
I'm not at YT to make friends and socialize. I do that in real life. I'm here to watch videos, and if I feel so inclined, to comment. So I'll watch your videos. I expect they'll further strengthen my beliefs as most Apollo hoax videos do. But I'll give you the benefit of doubt for the moment. Regardless, you will have to go a long way to convince me that Apollo could have been faked without the Russians knowing about it. I just don't believe our gov't is as infallible as you seem to think.
fleafrier1 9 months ago
lol anyone who beleives in the moon landing is a moron. its been proven beyond doubt that the aluminum sheilding used on the lem and all apollo craft would have intensified the radiation within the space capsules. apollo is total hogwash.
MrToiletface 10 months ago
@MrToiletface Don't try to explain that to an apollo nutter. They just can't wrap their tiny brains around it!
un4g1v3n1 10 months ago
@MrToiletface proven by whom?
fleafrier1 9 months ago
@MrToiletface Proven by whom?
fleafrier1 9 months ago
@fleafrier1 Well, if you would take the time to research the ongoing endeavors to find adequate shielding for REAL expeditions into RADIATION-LADEN space, you would find that answer for yourself. But, like most the sheep in this world, you trust the dogs biting at your heels, leading you to ignorance!
Or am I wrong? Do you question authorities, or accept what they tell you without using your own mind and common sense as a compass to truth?
Still wondering if the REAL HOUSEWIVES are REAL?
un4g1v3n1 9 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 Got a link or any real info? I question everyone who makes a claim. Including you. Seems to me you don't have any real answer other than an attempt to cater to my paranoia. Interestingly ironic that you also then encourage me to exercise common sense. Dude. They're watching you.
fleafrier1 9 months ago
@fleafrier1 "Seems to me you don't have any real answer other than an attempt to cater to my paranoia" And you try to insinuate I'm paranoid? Your funny, in a troll, been at YT for three years with no friends, videos, subscribers, or nothing to show for your time here? We both know this must be a sockpuppet account for another PAN trying to appear neutral. GIve it a rest. You want real answers. My videos will educate you about space radiation, unrealistic voice transmissions during launch
un4g1v3n1 9 months ago
cont..Lies by Armstrong and Collins saying they were unable to see stars on the moon, or in space blown out of the water. Unrealistic, jerky, puppeteer movements by astronuts, spotlights on the moon, pictures of astronuts standing in spotlit areas, with fall-off lighting, astronuts making weird claims like, they didn't think they went far enough to encounter the Van Allen Belts, Alan Bean, Don't deserve recognition, Armstrong's veiled confession. And they go on and on....
un4g1v3n1 9 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 I've watched 5 of your videos now and so far I still think you only raise vague questions but offer no real evidence. By my calculations, Apollo astronauts spent about half the time in the Van Allen belts needed to cause concern to OSHA. I've not yet found any evidence that aluminum increases this effect as you claim. The measure of your character seems to come across in your video productions. You do say fuck a lot. It does not strengthen your argument.
fleafrier1 9 months ago
@fleafrier1 "I've not yet found any evidence that aluminum increases this effect as you claim watch?"
v=6aWUa5l_WNs Start at the 54 minute mark and listen to a radiation expert blow your BS out of the water. Now, if you listen to her, and wish to continue polluting my videos with your lies, it will be adios biatch. Today is the last day of wasting another minute on PAN trolls. Anyone with half-a-mind, adequate hearing, working eyeballs, and courage to see truth, already see this fraud!
un4g1v3n1 9 months ago
@fleafrier1 Real info? Lies, deceptions, and missing proof. That's all NASA has to offer. Why don't you go to my channel and read, or even take the challenge I've put forth to astro/solar physicists? You want to explain why NASA would lie in the Apollo Biological reports about there being no major solar particle events, when all you have to do is go to the NGDC and see the major solar flares recorded there for your damn self? All you have done thus far is spew nonsense. Got Proof?
un4g1v3n1 9 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 I've watched more of your videos. One of them is just some animated superhero looking broad asking questions about apollo. No credentials, no real evidence, nothing but vague questions.. I've spent the last two hours looking up anything I could find on radiation exposure to apollo flights. Everything I've seen indicates that your claims are baseless. Hoax theorists remind me of a James Brown song: You're just talkin loud and sayin nothin.
fleafrier1 9 months ago
@fleafrier1 Generalizations, and mockery. Is that the entire stockpile of your ammunition. I mean besides your lies, and incapacity to use your mind in a critical thinking manner!
Once you listen to ELEANOR BLAKELY, (SPACE RADIATION and SHIELDING EXPERT) and then continue to believe in Apollo Fairy Tales, I'm afraid there is no hope for you! This video itself should have awakened you, but it seems you cling to Apollo like an infant clings to it's blanket!
un4g1v3n1 9 months ago
@fleafrier1 Have you gone to the NGDC and looked up the specifics of the MAJOR SOLAR FLARES during Apollo mission dates? Have you seen the lies in the APOLLO BIOLOGICAL REPORT, and mirrored on JAY WINDLEY's bullshit site? When one takes off their delusional blinders, and look at the facts, the only thing remaining is a huge sesspool of lies, deceptions, and milli vanilli astronuts!
un4g1v3n1 9 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 It took a while but I looked at NGDC data, and when matching mission dates it looks like there was a little H-alpha flare activity during apollo 10 & 12, but it was negligible during other missions. Had they flown in August of 72, however, it would have been a different story. There was a huge flare at that time. But they didn't fly. That was between apollo 16 & 17. My conclusions so far? NASA & the astronauts knew the risks, accepted them, went on with the missions, and got lucky.
fleafrier1 9 months ago
@fleafrier1 Ah, the good ole disinformational bullshit I've come to expect from lying, deceptive fucking PANs the world over. There were multiple MAJOR SOLAR FLARES during all but one Apollo mission. And some WHOPPERS occurred while around, and supposedly on the moon. Live your delusion somewhere else PAN boy!
I've let your lies stand long enough!
Blocked, ignored, history, just like your Apollo Fairy Tale. Into the sphere of the tooth fairy, and santy claus!
un4g1v3n1 9 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 4:48=plume... look at the liquidators of Chernobyl if you want to talk radiation survival... absence of noise ... gee what is sound? what medium does it propagate in? oh...air.... yes their is air in the cabin but none around so it wont sound the same as earth and Plantronics did their job right and the audio bandwidth of ssb isnt great. as for wild landing craft, the moons gravity is way lower and no wind shear, gives you multiple seconds more to react and adjust
Wuety06 8 months ago
@Wuety06 You know what...No amount of common sense, or intelligent understanding of radiation in space is going to help you now. You've decided to stick with your Apollo Fairy tales, like a child continues to believe in the tooth fairy cause their momma keeps putting quarters under their pillow.
Happy Apollo Fairy Tale dreams to you. Your Milli Vanilli astronuts appreciate your ignorance and blind faith!
un4g1v3n1 8 months ago
@Wuety06 That is exactly what I was thinking .
HYPNOTICVIDEO 8 months ago
@Wuety06 Which is it? Is the gravity much lower or just slightly different compared to earth? You people can't make up your minds on this issue. You apply your gravity statements when it is convenient for you in this HOAX. I will never understand why you people just keep fighting this bullshit lie when the evidence is sooooo overwhelming, lol!! The LEM landed flawlessly on the moon-set compared to the disaster crash and burn of Neil Armstrong on earth, too perfect, what a joke to debate...
GUARDIANtrooper 7 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper real numbers, i'll let you decide much or slightly. Free fall acceleration on the moon is 1.6m/s/s - earth is 9.8m/s/s. It fell 6.1 times slower than it would on earth. for the record if you reread my post i say "way lower". your counter argument based on much vs slightly is pointless because either way it was almost flyable on earth...slightly is all it would take, give it 6x the time for corrections and you get flawless. I seriously hope you were trolling
Wuety06 3 months ago
@MrToiletface "sheilding used on the lem and all apollo craft would have intensified the radiation"
Totally incorrect. There never was much radiation in the first place.
BjornPalmen 4 months ago
@BjornPalmen You are a deluded fuck! Watch a fucking science program once in a while!
un4g1v3n1 4 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 I happen to be a nuclear physicist. And I tell you, you are wrong. "There were multiple MAJOR SOLAR FLARES during all but one Apollo mission." Totally incorrect.
BjornPalmen 4 months ago
The moon landings were HOAXES! Its SO obvious!
toffeetigerkimba 4 months ago
@toffeetigerkimba Obvious eh? There are six well-documented (Apollo Lunar Surface Journal) landings on the Moon and three fly-bys, the astronauts are well known and their pictures on the Moon are in the ALSJ (google it!).
The guys who landed took parts af the Moon back with them, half a ton of lunar rocks.
How do you account for 24 astronauts going to the moon, 3 of them twice? Not so obvious!
The Moon landings really happened, look at the pictures and read the transcripts on the ALSJ.
BjornPalmen 4 months ago
So how did every single lunar module land PERFECTLY on the surface of the moon,with NO blast crater,not one speck of dust or dirt on the modules "feet", and how come so many still photos were doctored to change their effect? (look it up)
toffeetigerkimba 4 months ago
@toffeetigerkimba "So how did every single lunar module land PERFECTLY on the surface of the moon,with NO blast crater" The gravity was only 1/6 th Earth gravity and they came in slow at low engine power. But as you can hear on the Apollo 11 landing, Buzz Aldrin is commenting "[we are] kicking up some dust."
No still photos were ever doctored. The original developed film cassettes are on Apollo Lunar Surface Journal.
BjornPalmen 4 months ago
@BjornPalmen You aren't a nuclear phsyicist, your a goddamned liar! Even lying assholes can go to the NGDC and look up the major solar flares during Apollo mission dates. But we both know all you are is a lazy fucking PAN troll, who has no interest in truth! Don't we?
un4g1v3n1 4 months ago
@MrToiletface "aluminum sheilding used on the lem and all apollo craft would have intensified the radiation"
Not so! Aluminium NEVER intensifies any radiation in space.
BjornPalmen 4 months ago
@BjornPalmen Hey dipshit, take a look at the video with the radiation expert Eleanor Blakely....She specifically mentions that aluminum makes the radiation within the craft more dangerous than on the outside due to fragmentation! You truly are a PAN moron aren't you now?
un4g1v3n1 4 months ago
@stalkervision "What these Pan's doesn't realize is a whole lot of people at the time of apollo thought it was bogus and didn't believe it was real."
Yes, they KNEW it was a fraud! Believing is for PANS! They need a GOD to believe in, and Apollo is the perfect one! Being a pedophile GOD, APOLLO was the one mythical god PAN's can really relate to!
un4g1v3n1 10 months ago
@stalkervision Isn't it NASA that tracks the flight of his sleigh?
un4g1v3n1 10 months ago
@stalkervision The final nails on the Apollo Fairy Tale Coffin were hammered in long before the Apollo Truth Movement here on You Tube! It's just interesting to see how many more people still delude themselves about it. I guess even adults need a Santa Claus to believe in!
un4g1v3n1 10 months ago
@stalkervision You should see how they scurry to their PANtard websites in search of new lies to tell. I think trolls may be misnamed. They are more like rats. When their ship of lies starts sinking, they abandon the ship of their nic, and start a new one.
un4g1v3n1 10 months ago
@stalkervision He is the tool! Not a brain to be found in that one eh?
un4g1v3n1 10 months ago
thanks for uploading. where did you find the small video at 3:15? I've never seen that.
losability 11 months ago
I have a lunar conspiracy theory of my own. Mine is that the US government blew 20 billion dollars over 10+ years and pushed the aerospace, computing, electronics, metallurgy and bio-medicine industries of that country so far forward that they have maintained a lead which they largely hold to this day, and in the process achieved the single greatest feat of mankind and international kudos whilst making their opponents look like amateurs.
Theres your conspiracy, simple isnt it. Dickheads.
DumbYankies 11 months ago
apart from writing stupid comments on peoples home pages your still pushing this shit in a hope some will stick right?
films of a LEM not at the end of its development in gravity and dealing with air, compared to complete LEM in 1/6Th grave and no air, you may as well be picking faults with Artists dramatic representations of Luna landings, right?
it does not work, it makes you look "desperate".
Ashmansworth 1 year ago
@Ashmansworth i dont get the lem conspiracy at all. The simulator crashed. So what. Three american astronauts crashed and died in T38s during apollo or gemini. Is there some conspiracy there as well? One died in an automobile accident. Does that mean the lunar rover should not work because things with wheels obviously kill astronauts?
fucking tools....
DumbYankies 11 months ago
@DumbYankies If you don't get it, you only need look as far as your fallible logic!
un4g1v3n1 11 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 Explain the LEM conspiracy. What is the conspiracy? The simulator crashes on a training flight on earth therefore it cant possibly work on the moon? What is it.
DumbYankies 11 months ago
Breakdown: Three LEM trainers were crashed. There is not one unedited, successful flight of the LEM trainer to be found ANYWHERE. It has no ROCKET shape to it. They took weight off, loaded weight on, and yet we hear nothing about balancing the load. No technical manuals to explain how the farking thing worked. Paper thin aluminum walls you could stick your finger through. We are supposed to believe they were strong enough to hold a pressurized atmosphere. Not one video of them entering!!
un4g1v3n1 11 months ago
pt2. Jim Collier took a cherry picker, and went up to measure the LEM doorway. Found out there was no way a suited astronaut could fit through it. Now, instead of listening to some crazy hoax head like me, why don't you listen to the words of an astronaut the first time he saw the LEM (prop)!
watch?v=qGaKcjibbgY Bean, Armstrong, and others pipe in!
un4g1v3n1 11 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 Faaaack!!!! They removed that video.
forestinfullbloom 11 months ago
@DumbYankies
With enough time a person could think of a conspiratorial connection with all ten thousand people involved with the Luna landings, but as evidence suggests there is a lot of people out there with too much time on there hands.
yep.. "tools"
Ashmansworth 11 months ago
That USA used German expertise to build big rockets, isn't more strange than that USSR did exactly the same. Morale wasn't a big issue during the cold war. And, it still isn't in political reality.
Also, the same old lie about a "LEM prototype" crashing is popping up again here. Total ignorance or a deliberate lie?
YDDES 1 year ago
This is riddled with comments from Rene, the self tough physicists and acclaimed author. He recently drank himself to death.
IFlick 1 year ago
Wait, you mean to say that they overlooked such trivial details?! I am shocked. I mean... so amateur, what is up with that? They must have been in a real hurry or it never occured to them that one day in the near future people will get smarter and more critical... lol. Still, what about the hammer and feather drop? And the astronauts do look like they move in a micro gravity environment..
prozrachno 1 year ago
jesus fucking christ in a chicken basket, after watching i know who wanted to fake the moon mission. Armstrong did. problem is he could have just quite nasa and gone back to flying safe planes. and saved his what? sole? reputation? hes a mason those mean nothing.
datzfast 1 year ago
jesus fucking christ in a chicken basket, after watching i know who wanted to fake the moon mission. Armstrong did.
datzfast 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Notice that they have never participated in any debate whatsoever.If you doubt them they just run away.This silent absence is another loud proof.If me or you were real astronauts who been on the Moon ,no one would even dream to talk about hoax.I would take them out to TV debates and if fail to convince them I would sue them.-No messing!
potrodsas 1 year ago
@potrodsas You would think that Jarrah, Rene, Kaysing, Collier, Jack White, Sibrel, myself, and all the other moon hoax advocates would have been taken to court for slander/libel by NASA if what we were saying was all untrue. And yet, here the moon hoax strengthens in both it's evidence, and amount of 'believers'.
Come on NASA, if we are so full of crap, where's the lawsuit? How dare we sully the reputation of an Agency first headed by an Ardent, SS, NAZI officer, killer of jews? PEACE!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 T. Keith Glennan was a university president when selected as NASA's first administrator, and he was American born. In your zeal to associate NASA with Hitler, you seem to want to elevate Werner von Braun to a position he never held - he was never the head of NASA, and he certainly wan't the first administrator. Even so, I was unaware of the physical principle that designs by former Nazis cannot function as desired. Is that Newton's elusive fourth law?
roamingcroat 1 year ago
@roamingcroat Virtue and conscience. Not only something missing from our government, and it's organizations, but obviously from your thought processes! It's the elusive, you have none, if you think placing ardent NAZI's in positions of power, to create rockets, and experiment on American citizens minds is hunky fucking dory!
I have no zeal for associating NASA with Hitler...The CIA and Truman decided to do that when they came up with Project Paperclip, and decided to reward ARDENT NAZIs.
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
part 2. That you cannot figure out the horrendous mistake of allowing hundreds and hundreds of NAZI propulsion scientists, and MIND scientists into the US, after killing, torturing, and experimenting on JEWS, shows that you are not only stupid enough to believe it's all good, but that you have no sense of justice within your being. Rather sad, that you cannot figure that out for yourself!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 The politics and morality of bringing Nazi scientists to work on US projects has no bearing whatsoever on the facts of the Moon landing. Hitler himself could have designed the Saturn V; it would not affect the validity of the landings. You appeal to emotion by bringing up von Braun's Nazi past, but that hasn't got a thing to do with the facts of the Moon landing. But its apparent that you want to discredit the achievement by making pointless and inaccurate statements about NASA.
roamingcroat 1 year ago
@roamingcroat The difference between Hitler and the United States, is that Hitler used V2's with conventional explosives. The US arms their ICBM's with nuclear warheads. And the US proved they were more than willing to use them on civilian targets.
The moonlanding was a hoax, and the fact that you can look at Apollo photos, or watch videos of them being jerked around by wires on the moon, just proves that you are an idiot! Sorry, but that's the fact jack!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 OK, Hitler is still irrelevant to the Moon landing, so I have nothing to say about your first paragraph.
As for the landings, I have yet to see any rational reason why the landings would have been faked, and I have yet to see any analysis that proves (or even demonstrates) there are wires attached to the astronauts. The closest hoaxers come to that is showing videos with unusual movements and saying "wires!" over and over again. Show me wires were needed for those movements with math
roamingcroat 1 year ago
@roamingcroat Really? Nothing to say about the US, and Hitler being okay with killing people with rockets? Nothing? I guess you could give a shit who is killling people, or how they are doing it right?
If you would get off your lazy ass, go to my main channel page, and go to the links I have provided for lazy asses like yourself, you can get a clue. See the lies about major solar flares. See programs which explain the DEADLY amounts of radiation in the VAB's and beyond.
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 It is not relevant to the facts of Apollo. I am not here to discuss the second World War.
I've seen some of your other videos, and I've heard most, if not all, of your claims. I specifically commented here because of your statement that either a) T. Keith Glennan was a Nazi or b) Werner von Braun was the first NASA administrator. Neither is true. And I think it's indicative of the way you do your research.
roamingcroat 1 year ago
@roamingcroat I've seen some of your other videos, and I've heard most, if not all, of your claims. I specifically commented here because of your statement that either a) T. Keith Glennan was a Nazi or b) Werner von Braun was the first NASA administrator. Neither is true. And I think it's indicative of the way you do your research.
What this is indicative of is your inability to refute what my vidoes claim. Instead you decided to use diversion of a fact that is nothing more than semantics!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@roamingcroat I've seen some of your other videos, and I've heard most, if not all, of your claims. I specifically commented here because of your statement that either a) T. Keith Glennan was a Nazi or b) Werner von Braun was the first NASA administrator. Neither is true. And I think it's indicative of the way you do your research.
What this is indicative of is your inability to refute what my vidoes claim. Instead you decided to use diversion of a fact that is nothing more than semantics!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@roamingcroat pt2. Here's your research: In 1960, his rocket development center transferred from the Army to the newly established NASA and received a mandate to build the giant Saturn rockets. Accordingly, von Braun became director of NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center and the chief architect of the Saturn V launch vehicle, the superbooster that would propel Americans to the Moon.
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@roamingcroat pt 2 Von Braun also became one of the most prominent spokesmen of space exploration in the United States during the 1950s. In 1970, NASA leadership asked von Braun to move to Washington, D.C., to head up the strategic planning effort for the agency. He left his home in Huntsville, Ala., but in 1972 he decided to retire from NASA and work for Fairchild Industries of Germantown, Md. He died in Alexandria, Va., on June 16, 1977.
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 So what ? Von Braun was a genuis at making rockets. So what ?? what's your point ???
toocoolforu 1 year ago
@toocoolforu I guess it's kind of difficult for idiots to fathom the political, social, and just reasons why ardent NAZI, killer of the five slowest jews everyday, doesn't deserve TIMES man of the YEAR, but rather a noose around his neck after a swift trial for his crimes! Is being that stupid difficult? Do you have to work at being so ignorant. Do you have to get plenty of extra mercury-laden vaccinations to live in the kind of denial you reside in? Or are you just another damn moron troll?
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 What a moronic comment. Times magazine also made Stalin and Hitler as man of the year, again, Whats your point ??? No one gives a shit that you don't like Von Braun! He wasn't even a "ardent nazi" as you like to think. Yeah, nazi germany was so evil booh booh, and the good americans were angels. What a nice fantasy world you live in.
toocoolforu 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 and the russians used german scientists as well. The problem was there werent as smart as ours. So im guessing soviet/serbian appologists like yourself are shit out of luck.
DumbYankies 11 months ago
@roamingcroat pt3 So tell me again how the facts of Apollo are not relevant to the facts that they used WWII ardent NAZI rocket and mind scientists in our military industrial complex, space programs, and universities, psychiatric hospitals all over the US? War criminals given high paying, jobs within some of the most delicate, top-secret operations of great interest to the US public, since their tax dollars were footing the bill! Tell me again, how those facts are IRRELEVANT?
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 how are they relevant to a hoax. In fact the reinforce a success rather than a hoax. If you are trying to win you use the best, no matter how much you may not like to use the services of those people for other reasons. The cold war was a WAR. You are too young to remember obviously sonny but just because there was no direct superpower conflict did not mean that winning was not everything....
DumbYankies 11 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 "Wires" ?? You mean "radio antennas" ? Again, debunking lies you saw and heard on idiotic websites. Time to study math and history my friend, unless they're meant to control you either lol. Booh booh the US ICBMs were filled with A-bombs ?? You realize Nazis would have done the same if they had the Bomb I hope. Who said Americans were all innocents ? BTW H-bombs were dropped by B-52 not ICBM. The MAD politic probably saved us all too. Bombs are slowly recycled now... How old are you ?
toocoolforu 1 year ago
IT's not my footage. NASA's! My footage would have included hundreds of UNEDITED test flights from different angles, including onboard of pilot, to prove that I had a reliable craft for radiation-proof test pilots to land on the HIGHLY IRRADIATED moon, while they were being hit by micormeteorites, Solar Radiation, Gamma Rays, as well as the secondary radiation spraying up at them form their very feet!
You see, anyone who knows the reality of the cislunar space environment knows it was a sham!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
No atmosphere = no exaust plume and no engine sound.
worldwidedownload 1 year ago 2
@worldwidedownload Wrong, guess you missed the video of the Shuttle ABOVE our atmosphere, proving your disinformation completely wrong! Nice try though....I guess you'll have to go back to baut and find their pat excuse for that one...Debunk fail yet again! Besides the fact that within the LEM an atmosphere is created within which sound waves will CARRY SOUND. Is that too much for you to understand? I suggest immediate removal of the portion of your brain that buys into the Apollo lies!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 I guess I did. You can see in your own footage that the LEM has very little or no plume in Earths atmosphere so did you really expect to see one on the moon. You'd be able to feel the engine sounds/vibrations but with the heat sheild and sound proofing little would be picked up by the mic. Maybe you could help me replace that part of my brain by convincing me with some evidence.
worldwidedownload 1 year ago
@worldwidedownload Sorry, I answered you at the top....Your brain being of some importance to you, I thought you might want to read it...
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 About the sound of the LEM : You have to realize that the sound of a rocket engine comes from the fire plume, not from the engine. If you think this is too weird for your funny brain, listen to space shuttle outer space thrusts, they make only vibrations and tiny sound. Unless you think the ISS is fake too :D
toocoolforu 1 year ago
@toocoolforu I guess it's too funny for your little brain to understand how vibrations change the sound of your voice! Do you believe in shuttle missions? Yes? Now watch watch?v=v1c6ktHYO-I The use of common sense, and one's own ears is all it takes to spot this fake. I guess some people, with their funnyk brains, just prefer to fool themselves, and allow their tax dollars to be stolen from them for bullshit! Welcome to the prison of your own delusional mind pal!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 I think it's sad that you keep denying that the space age is begun. I don't see your goal by disclaiming the Apollo missions, that was an amazing human progress. Facts are facts, you find any possible anomaly you believe false and jump into absurdly conclusions. That's funny indeed that engineers around the world would hide such things, no later than 30 minutes ago a french spacecraft was launched to supply the ISS, guess that's fake too according to you! People like you are sad.
toocoolforu 1 year ago
LEM TOY
made of gold tin foil
and a 4kb ram calculator for a computer
Nasa Nazi Fake Apollo Missions
2nasafakedit 1 year ago
Van Allens original research in the AUG '59 Scientific American, pointed out that the belts are a sea of deadly radiation and that all missions through them will have to be unmanned until sufficient shielding is developed. And Van Allen is dead, so agreement is impossible...His research stands as his comment on the belts...
And your comment about radiologists is so wrong I don't know where to start. You ask those in the radiation treatment medical field if they believe in Apollo!!!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1
Van Allen never said that manned missions through the belts are not possible and he spent his last years rebutting all those silly "deadly radiation" claims.
blablubb12345 1 year ago
@blablubb12345 Have you read the Scientific American Article...YES OR NO!
Watch some science programs about space and wake up...
Start here...I've highllighted the many claims of DEADLY RADIATION WITHIN AND BEYOND THE VAB's so you don't have to watch the entire programs..but you should. You might come out of your Apollo Coma.
watch?v=Bqv4q35QqUg
Watch and educate yourself...continue lying and troll spamming my vid and gonzo pal!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1
blablubb12345 = NAZI SALLY FAKE ACCOUNT
5678APFELMUS 1 year ago
@5678APFELMUS Ya, I know...I'm trying to give the benefit of doubt...Plus I have my 12 days of Christmas ban lifting on the 13th...If the banned trolls behave appropriately, they can stay...If not...it's just a matter of pushing a button...
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
LEM is the stupidest and less believable equipment showed on moon landing movies. It is so full of non-sense and non-technical issued... NOTE: even today the landing techniques used to lenad rovers on alien plantes are not AT ALL based on LEM technology, but with jumping balloons (with risks of damaging equipments), like on recent mission to Mars. LEM technology has never been used in any other missions on alien landings even in case of simply probes.
1965christian 1 year ago
@1965christian
ALL unmanned landings on the moon were "powered landings" like the LM did. It's the only way to land in a vacuum. The Mars landers Viking 1 and 2 and Phoenix also landed on engine power. Maybe you should wonder why no aviation or space engineer agrees with you.
blablubb12345 1 year ago
@blablubb12345 You should go take a look at one of the LM's in the musuem. You can poke your finger through the skin of the thing. To believe that it was capable of holding a pressurized atmosphere to sustain life is nothing short of idiocy!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@un4g1v3n1
Good luck poking your finger through this:
tinyurl(dot)com/3yv3sc5
You've been told that there is a pressure vessel inside the LM for numerous times so write your BS to someone else.
blablubb12345 1 year ago
@blablubb12345
Thanks for answering.
Let's put in this way. Let's wait until a new LEM or LM or an other sort of vaccum lander will land "once more" on the moon. Then we shall see.
If we'll all still be alive.
1965christian 1 year ago
@1965christian
India plans to launch Chandrayaan-2 in 2013, including a lander provided by the Russian space agency. I strongly hope that we are still alive by then ;-)
blablubb12345 1 year ago
@blablubb12345 Very funny! Please tell us all the technology that will allow them safe passage through the VAB's, into the deadly radiation within and beyond. Including the 4 billion years of irradiated Moon...Secondary Nuetron radiation coming up at them from their feet, as well as solar radiation/GCR's hitting them from all sides?
Please explain how in three short years India will overcome a problem, NASA, RUSSIA, and ESA have yet to solve!
PLEASE!
This should be good!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1
Explain why the Apollo CM doesn't have enough shielding to fly to the moon! Explain why no radiologist or spaceflight engineer and even James van Allen agrees with you! And btw, i never said that China/India are planning manned flights to the moon.
blablubb12345 1 year ago
@blablubb12345 If you continue to post lies, I will block you...
Last warning...
Metal, aluminum, steel..all terrible shielding as the solar particles, and other dangerous particular radiation will cause fragmentation increasing and lowering the speed of the secondary particles enough to stick in the skin of humans....Wave radiation such as Gamma Rays move right through all solid material...even lead...although it will lower the count...if there is enough!
Cont.
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@blablubb12345
As far as I know, there are no plans to visit the moon again. After more than 40 years, the Apollo 'holidays on the moon' still remain the only one of its kind outside earth orbit.. Since then, in all space programs, scientists are developing just "orbiting" activities with astronauts, that's all...... If you don't go along with the apollo hoax theory, movies, pictures and stuff, you should at least notice this evidence that something IS strange. Isn' it?
1965christian 1 year ago
@1965christian Not to be an ass brother, but that is conjecture. Astrophysicists explaining there are several hundred million solar particles in every square inch of space, every SECOND, is fairly convincing evidence that the trip to the moon is impossible for human beings without proper shielding. Aluminum is not only not proper, but more dangerous due to secondary particles due to fragmentation.
Numerous other sources may be cited as well to support why the journey was impossible!!!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1
Look, I am not the one who will jump up and say for certain that the moon landing is a total fraud, although I have good reasons to think so. And I think so.
1965christian 1 year ago
@1965christian As you rightly should brother...But I am the one who will jump up, raise my hand in a crowd, and tell people what the true nature of space is. Even though many will be too proud to listen, too ignorant to understand, and too impatient to hear me out, I'll continue to point out this fraud on and off the net!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@1965christian
India and China will send unmanned spacecraft to the moon, both containing a lander and a rover. Space Adventures and the russian space agency are planning manned trips to the moon with a Soyuz spacecraft, but without landing. Just a "Apollo 13 style" swing-by. And no, there isn't anything strange on the Apollo stuff.
blablubb12345 1 year ago
@blablubb12345
Question: why unmanned spacecraft? Why India and China? Where is NASA? In the 60's NASA "landed on the moon" several times, and every time was a royal success. Landing in the moon 40 years ago was like taking the train to Yuma. Why now are they starting from stupid probes again? For what? Ask yourself. Find an answer by your self.
Please don't say "money" though...
1965christian 1 year ago
@1965christian
Why unmanned spacecraft? Well, china's manned spaceflight program is in it's early stages and India has still a long way to go. Why not NASA? They had a moon landing program until this year.
blablubb12345 1 year ago
@blablubb12345 They had a moon landing program until this year.
Now if that hasn't woke you up, what will? Obama must have got the we really didn't go speech, and pissed him off! Don't piss off Potus!!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@1965christian
The main reason why the US or Russia don't fly to the Moon (manned) is the lack of a heavy lift rocket. Both, the Saturn V and Energia, were scrapped a long time ago and it would take a long time - and money - to build a new heavy launcher. After all, it IS money that's missing (or the political will, if you want).
blablubb12345 1 year ago
@blablubb12345 Another LIE...You really need to stop....You've been warned...I
Science does not go backwards...Discovery does not recede....
If so, Europeans would have quit risking their ass on ships coming to the Americans after they were discovered...And the British wouldn't have fought the civil war...THe COST WOULD HAVE BEEN TOO MUCH!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@1965christian
The same question is: Why doesn't Europe have a manned spacecraft? It's all there, a descent launcher, a fully automated resupply ship for the ISS, several reentry test vehicles, astronauts and a training center, experience in building manned parts of space stations (spacelab, columbus, Node 2 and 3, cupola). It's just the lack of political will and without that, tere is no money to do such things.
blablubb12345 1 year ago
@1965christian
Ah, and by the way: The lander is called "LM" for "Lunar Module", "LEM" for "Lunar Excursion Module" was used only in the beginnings of the program.
blablubb12345 1 year ago
I've heard they used an alternative technology to get off the moon.
Theris1011 1 year ago
@Theris1011 you'll hear lots of shit as you go through life
ghodium 1 year ago