AT-94 P Pistol from ATI - American Tactical Imports

[TheTacticalView]

$1550.00 for that??? A dollar a piece for daffodills????

[swordsman3000]

LMAO...wait...LMAO again at $1550

sorry to burst any bubbles, but a 16 inch barrel does VERY little in enhancing the 9mm round...and with no stock you can't take full advantage of the long sight radius

in short...it's a POINTLESS damn weapon...You'd be better off with a glock 17 with (10) 33 round mags for $1000 if ya want to spray a bunch of 9mm's around

[sailfishflorida55]

Does this mean this has to be an AOW to add a fixed stock?

[MetallicHorizon]

If it's classified as a pistol then why the long barrel?

[hardman476]

RIP OFF PRICE

[fjkhoury01]

All you need is the correct number of compliance parts to put a stock on it making it a rifle, no paperwork required. The 16 barrel is why its not an SBR. You can convert a pistol with a long enough barrel to a rifle but not the other way round without paperwork. This guy is srsly confused...

[AngeredKabar]

@fjkhoury01 Remember there is an overall length requirement for rifles along with the barrel length.

[njurado87]

I wish someone would comeout with a solid SP89, HK 94 clone at a RIGHT price. Theres such a huge market just waiting for a reliable product!

[ccap3211]

That's one ugly pistol. I would never pay 1550 for this.

[Redtornado73]

Can you shorten the barrel?

[GunWebsites]

@ rllang01

before you offer advice, check your facts.. the AOW does NOT include the stock

[GunWebsites]

@ rllang01

Get over it, we obviously didn't script this.. AOW do NOT have stocks..

[gozzy4u]

Does anyone else think this will be one of those quickly discontinued and forgotten firearms too?

[glock19x300]

Who the hell wants a pistol with a 16" barrel for 1500? Who would buy this?

"I FEEL LIKE I'M TAKING CRAZY PILLS!"

[glock19x300]

@rllang01

I completely understand the capability of 9mm, I carry it in my duty pistol, and have carried it in an MP5 before, however, being restricted as a pistol only I just think that that this weapon lacks a few features like a stock, and decent price to be of ay value.

[mammoth321]

Wait... 16" Barrel? That's consider a rifle. You don't need any tax stamp for butt stock or foregrip. The guys demoing is just mis-informed.

[1PATRI0T]

I'm confused about the classification. Can someone explain it to me? For example: he said it is classified as a pistol, with no mag restrictions, etc. So if I buy it as is, and leave it with a pistol grip, I don't have to jump through any hoops, pay any tax stamp, or get any ATF liscence?... Is that right?

[ksthomas]

If you buy it as a pistol, it has to stay a pistol. You can't put a buttstock or foregrip on a pistol. If you out a foregrip on it to be legal you would have to apply to the ATF for a $5.00 AOW stamp. But you cannont put a rifle buttstock on it. Once a pistol always a pistol. You could aways hold the mag well like it was a foregrip.

[PaleHorseWC2]

@ksthomas Old post but I feel I need to correct you. No, a pistol can be made into a rifle, but not vice versa. If you take a pistol and add a 16in barrel and a stock, you have made a rifle, and can add whatever foregrip you want. You cannot add a stock to a pistol without a long barrel, thats an SBR.

[mammoth321]

@1PATRI0T

If you want butt stock you take it to an SOT Gunsmith to register it SBR (Short Barrel Rifle) for you for $200 to the ATF then if you want a foregrip you do the same and register it as AOW (All Other Weapon). If SOT do it for you that's $5 but if you do it that's $200 to ATF.

[ksthomas]

Buy the 16" rifle with the buttstock. Take the buttstock off and put the MP5A1 pistol buttcap on and the problem is solved. It's still a rifle or better yet buy the A3 buttstock and have the best of both worlds.

[TMHonfire102]

That fucking bullshit 16 incher and still not to SBR it, WTF is that shit about

[BigSean1992]

Jesus the ATF is retarded what do those redonkulous laws accomplish?

[1cme1]

they have to do it in order to import...

also, why did they choose to not have the handguard on it? it looks retarded.

[BigSean1992]

i know that but why did they make the laws in the first place? were there just some anti gun peeps in a room and they were just like "hey what can we do to f**k with gun owners?"

[1cme1]

oohh lol my bad, i thought you said ATI, not ATF.

ya its retarded.

[RevolverPhantom]

@BigSean1992 Yeah, that's pretty much what it is.

[TheTacticalView]

@BigSean1992 Actually the law making rifle barrels came about because a bunch of commie hippies decided to rob some banks back in the sixties with a sawed off rifle. No kidding. It's bullshit law, and I hope some real president has the balls to get rid of it with an executive order. (even though I don't like executive orders) :)

[spraynpray]

@BigSean1992 Gun control laws were put into affect as jim crow was failing. Blacks were poor and short barreled weapons were cheaper. It was common for a poor black man to have a 14 or 16 inch barreled shotgun. The NFA was created to fuck the poor, IE the black.

[BigSean1992]

@spraynpray IE everyone, the 1968 GCA added the title 2 bullshit (SBS and SBR's) not the NFA although the NFA did the same thing with machine guns and suppressors (the 200$ extortion fee). (i done lernd some stuff :D) also the 1968 GCA is what brought about all this bullshit "sporting purpose" nonsense too. funny how all these awful gun control laws come into existence under Democrats =/

[spraynpray]

@BigSean1992 Well Jim Crow laws died in 1965. I didn't realize they lasted that long and I didn't realize SBR/SBS were added in 68. I was unintentionally right!

[TheTacticalView]

@BigSean1992 Those laws allow the atf to harass gun owners my friend. (and murder people at Ruby Ridge Idaho of course)