@bennythebearful My people are ignorant and apathetic. Plain and simply put, stupid. America will fall like Rome. Corrupt officials shall turn the United States into an oligarchy. To future civilizations America will be just another history lesson on how complacent citizens allowed their rights to be stripped of them. It is sickening.
Interestingly,there's a video showing window washers on the side of Building 7 with (WTC 1 smoking in the background) that shows them exactly in the spot where the side is seen blowing out in this video.
Lol, SURE, it was the terrorists alright. You let a bunch of sand maggots crawl all the way to your country, and SOME HOW, THEY, Fucking did this. LOL, so basicly YOU GOT OWNED by people that wipes their ass with sand. USA is pathetic, and your children will LOVE the 9/11 fairy tales for years and years. Tell them how weak you and your buildings truely are for.
The rest of the world laughs at you USA. You are the laughing stock of the whole world.
Man im not sure if this was a controlled demo, but this sure looks like it. MY country the USA, has done so much bullshiting and covering up that is makes me sick.
If I had to pick between the two, id say it was a controlled demo. Fuck my government.
@MegaYeshua33 The video was shot from the roof of a building near on Chambers Street near the river. The video starts zoomed way in at the base of WTC7. The cameraman's attention was attracted by explosions or sounds of beginning collapse, so he zoomed out, frantically trying to get the whole structure in view.
Has any building in HISTORY ever fallen like the three WTC towers on 911.... for any reason EVER?? Americans are unbelievably controlled gullible little peasants to allow their government to get away with this.
NO NO NO...it was the wind. It's very strong and EVERYBODY knows, for a fact, that the wind knocks buildings down. I herd someone somewhere say something like that, I think.
random flashes and bright flash at 6 seconds on the left hand side! - sorry if you think this is not a controlled demolition..... there is something wrong with you
READ! Seientific American oct 2011 issue /page 42... US Geologists and pentagon have scanned Afghanistan and found rare earth minerals for 7,4 billion$ and 82 billion$ on other minerals. They are building rail tracks across the country and wtc had to fall in order to go there.. Is a Trade! World Trade Center. (the new wtc is at Shanghai! Its a cool building 500+ meters- yes try to understand. Read Scientific american and everything will be CRYSTAL clear. It´s always about money/power/Gold etc.
@777thefreedomfighter yes opium production is up 1000% ( good for CIA)and the natural gas from north/russia can also pass now to the ocean.... maybe yemen/iran/pakistan is nxt? Monopoly big boy´s game. The US don´t touch north korea- they belong to china. Crazy world and 2 billion people need a simole house and food, while superrich have trillions. A lot will happen.
@candon1972 It's costing us 2 billion dollars a day to run our millitary. It's 2011 so thats 7.3 trillion dollars in ten years vs. your 156 billion for unamed secret minerals. Not to mention the cost to stage such a big terrorist plot, the cost of the railways, or the repairs in New York and loss of life. Besisdes Bush is already rich. It just seems a little farfecthed to me. I bet you also believe in the secret underground oil pipelines and chemtrails.
for anyone who thinks the usa gov would not do such a thing as 911 or kill its own just look at Gulf of Tonkin incident that got the usa involved in the Vietnam war it was not hit by a torpedo the second time; there was simply a mistake in the radar transmission). President Johnson used these events as an excuse to allow American troops to be sent to engage in war against North Vietnam,an excuse to enter the war
If your goal is the truth, then you must never stifle debate, if you find yourself stifling debate, then there is a good chance your position is bullshit. Free people always ask questions, and always demand truth.
Yup it was controlled demolition oh well the government did it and theres nothing we can do about it we just have to live with it. Now lets watch some exciting television. Who wants to be a millionaire, or american idol, Ill go with dancing with the stars
@TheCristo68 it's the wind. Because everyone knows that our Government doesn't know how to do this(very simple) type of demolition. It's Impossible...that's what the TV said.
@TheCristo68 Shattering glass in a weak section of the building is SHATTERING GLASS! There were no explosions. No flashes of light, and WHY wouldn't there be explosions on the levels above or below the area in question if THAT'S how it should look? Damn, you people are so pathetic and will cling to anything. Please, give me your background in controlled demolition?
@19nisey69 Same thing to you .Please, give me your background in controlled demolition? As far as being pathetic , i'm not the sheep here willing to beleive blindly what the mainstream media and your goverment spoon feed you .Use your eyes , they don't lie .What your are looking at is exactly that , a controled demolition . If you had no idea what building this was and saw it for the first time you would say , controled demolition .when goverment tell you its not, you can't see for yourself .
@TheCristo68 it is true that buildings that aren't controlled don't collapse so perfectly and even the twin towers the same thing can be said, but what you saw could be the dust exiting air ducts that go along an elevator shaft
I still have yet to hear one person come up with one reason WHY anyone would want to blow this building up. Or am I asking a stupid question? Everyone gets so carried away with "It was controlled demolition; No it wasn't..." that no one can explain the possible incentive.
If someone (a former employee for example) said, "This office building contained 500 secret CIA files about the Bush administration's ties to the Saudi government", I might jump on the wagon and scream "smoking gun"...
@billykid84 It is a valid question,and I am not entirely sure, but when most people don't even know Bld 7 collapsed because the media doesn't cover it and the fact that the 9/11 report does not once mention it, it begs a few questions in my books.
@maleman6344 The media did mention it, due to a mistake the BBC mentioned it before it even collapsed - now that's reporting!
The 9/11 comission did not mention WTC7 because it was not attacked and there were no deaths. The report was not set up to examine everything; just what happened, why it happened and how how it could happen.
There's no question on 9/11 that can't be answered rationally without the need for 'conspiracies'.
@billykid84 Incentives don't matter when it comes to these nutty conspiracy theorists! They get all there news from Alex Jones and fox! Plus they make up shit like the moon landing was faked and that the holocaust was a hoax. Trust me they don't think of incentive. They just probably think that people have nothing better to do so they go"Hm... What can i do today?. Um i know!!! I'll blow up the world trade center but i have to fake the moon landing first!!!". Lol.
@TheUnbiasedGamer If your goal is the truth, then you should never stifle debate. Why would any reasonable intelligent person's goal not be the truth?
@filmmaker58 The truth? Lol!!! You're set in your ways in thinking that people have nothing better to do other then plant explosives in a building in public for no apparent reason what so ever and kill tons of people, Then blame it on Osama Binladen.and of course Osama was okay with that because he also had nothing better to do but go along with George W. Bush(The president of the country he hates) and do him a solid by lying and saying he did it. The things boredom can do to people. Jeesh!
@billykid84 Thats a great question that would be important for a genuine investigation of the event to answer. Unfortunately none has occurred, and sadly most people are opposed to it occurring also.
New video footage 10x closer then that clip just surfaced is being played on youtube and has gotten pulled almost as soon as its put up....DAMNING FOOTAGE
If the side that faced the WTC was badly damaged and had a chunk missing, that would be asymmetrical damage, and you'd expect it to lean toward the damaged side, and do something more like falling over. But as you can see, it came down symmetrically. I think it was simply overcome by despair at the events of the day, and just gave up.
If the side that faced the WTC was badly damaged and had a chunk missing, that would be asymmetrical damage, and you'd expect it to lean toward the damaged side, and do something more like falling over. But as you can see, it came down symmetrically. I think it was simply overcome by despair at the events of the day, and just gave up.
911 marks the day the US and Israel killed 3000 Americans on US soil as a pretext to go and kill millions more in other countries and all for the Greater Israel.
All these building 7 videos only show the "good" sides of the building. The side that is facing the WTC is badly damaged and has a huge chunk smashed out of it. You people are stupid for thinking its an inside job.
@NotableJInx2 It would have been possible to fly a plane into WTC7 because it was 47 floors. However, it would have been against FAA regulations. It was a highly secure building. Twoofer faggots are too stupid to know that!
"would have been possible to fly a plane into WTC7"
Yes, if the hijackers would have planned to do a little Manhattan parcours through hundreds of office buildings with a Boeing. You fail. Your whole post is a giant twoofer fail. I'm not sure why you put in that last sentence in your reply, maybe you had some moment of clarity or something.
Geez, you guys even fail to come up with simple strawmans LMAO. "FAA regulations[...]" lol! Thanks for the chuckles, dumbass.
realize this! building 7 was badly damaged,there was a fire burning unchecked,the building was old the fireproofing probably was no good on it, the towers fell because when the planes hit the fireproofing got blasted off of the beams so the jet fuel in the 2 towers burned through it and cause the floors to pancake on themselves,thats why the Twin towerds fell straight down,you conspiracy theorists shame the memory of those lost that day
Ok, anyone come to the conclusion that someone might have wanted to bring down that building, and it WAS a controlled explosion? Maybe controlled by a cell phone detonator or whatever they may have used... Nope, it was Bush.
It collapsed i am from chile and i think that conspiracy theorists are kids who cannot grasp the fact that they are not safe from the outside world, they have to believe that for something like 9/11 to happen it has to be an inside job, because they cannot accept that a few muslim extremist destroyed the twin towers. Its just a weird form of patriotism but the sad part of it is that here in south america conspiracy theories are accepted as facts and they undermine the image of the united states
Either the last commenter is out of his mind or never took high school physics. Buildings can't collapse perfectly into their own footprint without explosives. It 100% was controlled demolition.
@WTC7WasPulled actually it probably could because if u remember there was a parking lot under and tunnels throughout the underground of the the trade center buildings, such as this one. When the twin towers collapsed it was around a 4.5 earthquake. This building probably collapsed because of the earth quake, and the beams collapsed from the pressure, and the parking lot and caved in. And everyone is mentioning 2ndary explosions, yea there were cars under the buildings duh, uno they explode nfire
please stop spreading your nonsense, WTC7 burned for 7 hours unattended, WTC7 did not have working sprinklers due to a water main break. WTC7 also had critical structural members on floors 5 and 6 which were on fire. They also had the possibility of 20,000 gallons of diesel fuel feeding the fire. now please explain to me your vast knowledge of physics. oh that's right, the only reason you mentioned physics was to make yourself sound smarter in the presence of logical people.
@WTC7WasPulled The interior collapsed first, contained by the outer shell, then the outer steel shell collapsed, that's why it appears to have collapsed so quickly.
@zelenko2 No, I just don't rule out the fact that a building with extensive structural damage and fires burning for over 7 hours straight could potentially collapse. You however, are just speculating. Until you have objective evidence I am inclined to ignore ridiculous claims about inside jobs.
@rpsmith014 well firts of all i dont even know how the fires were started... berry jenings the last man out of wtc 7 was the key whitnes which was killed in years ago... he heard explosions... and even in a video are shown some flashes on wtc 7 just before the north tower impact... thermite evidence are everywhere
@rpsmith014 and buddy there was a scyscraper in spain that burned for nearly24 hours... all other stuff rather than steel columns more or less burned out... but guess what... the steel structure of 50 floorsdid not collapse or even bend... i mean this is the first time in history that a scyscraper would colapse due to office fire
@zelenko2 I know that thermite was found. Believe me, I get that there are many good reasons for speculation, but I don't jump to conclusions. If after 10 years there is no consensus on the issue, then I'm not sure there will ever be one, regardless of the truth.
@rpsmith014 i mean even classic controled demo flashes are seen... a lot lot lotl ot of them... clearly seen... and there is a video which shows audio of an huge massiv explosion like ground shaking... and thats just before collapse...
@zelenko2 I'm interested to see those videos you are talking about. Not because I don't believe you, but I'm just curious myself. Like I said, I am fascinated by these conspiracy theories, I just don't hold concrete opinions either way, because there is no unified consensus on the matter.
@rpsmith014 well one of the evidence is right in this video... 0:03 secs... whatch the horizontal crush of the floors on the right side... there are some classical CH flashes and than on the top a big flashhh...
@marvelfannumber1 Yes it fell into its own footprint in a neat nice pile that didn't affect any of the surrounding buildings. This was a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. 1600 Architects and Engineers at AE911TRUTH. ORG have all the evidence one could need.
"Yes it fell into its own footprint in a neat nice pile that didn't affect any of the surrounding buildings"
ROFL do some reasearch and know what you are talking about. Google fiterman hall and barclay vesey building. Instead of saying ignorant crap like that.
the uncontrolled fires buckled key supports in the building. Fire personnel reported buckling at 2 PM. The supports gave way, and the building buckled and collapsed. The window breakage is from building buckling, not explosives.
@bubbalouification that would make sense if the building toppled over and fell down in pieces....not like this. no way. buildings dont fall into themselves at the speed of gravity unless they are, as the owner of the buildings accidentally admitted, "pulled."
@rockermanmatt lol. now now....no need for name calling. you're not the one who pulled the building. but someone definitely did. all you have to do is open your eyes. all the evidence is there. i didn't want to believe it at first either.
@CathartikRequiem There is no evidence. The bulding didn't fall at the speed of gravity, what a joke. It took at least 13 seconds and there was an internal collapse before the outer columns gave in. So who did it? Who's lying?
NIST, FEMA, the Military, NY fire dept, Port Authority, United/America airlines, steelworkers, demolition experts, Silverstein, insurance companies, Mayor Guiliani, every witness...are they all in on mass murder?
@rockermanmatt did you know WTC7 is the third high rise, steel framed building to collapse due to fire in history? the first two were the north and south towers. i guess it's a new trend now.
@CathartikRequiem Did you know the Titanic was mean to be unsinkable but then it sank? Did you know that scientists have just made particles move faster than the speed of light which contradicts the basic laws of physics and may allow time travel? And you think a steel building that was hit by half of another steel building, lost at least one supporting column and was left to burn for seven hours couldn't collapse?
Stop trying to convert people to your pathetic religion.
@rockermanmatt things moving faster than the speed of light doesn't contradict science. and i have no religion. religion is as big of a farse as the "official" story of what happened. i mean come on, even the people who wrote the commission report are coming out saying it was a big book of lies. oh well, as the brilliant president bush stated, "let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories." since that would be...ya know...unamerican
@CathartikRequiem "things moving faster than the speed of light doesn't contradict science". I'm sorry, did you not go to school? It contradicts the basic laws of physics which is that the speed of light is the maximum speed. You clearly don't know what you're talking about.
You do have a religion. Religion is a group of people with the same beliefs etc. Just as people have no proof of God, you have no proof of your claims - yet you not only believe them over science, you preach them.
@rockermanmatt ....typical debate tactic. attacking the individual instead of the arguement. do you really think i didn't go to school? or is that some sort of defense? there is far too much evidence out there for me to believe the "official" story given to us. especially when the commission report authors are admitting the lied and were lied to. im not going to change your opinion, nor are you going to change mine. im done here.
@CathartikRequiem I was not attacking you, I was responding to the ridiculous comment you made. I was stating that for someone to make a comment as mind blowingly dumb as that, they obviously didn't go to school.
You've just admitted you don't care about the truth. By stating "nor are you going to change mine", you've admitted that no amount of evidence will change your opinion. It's because you're arrogant and unable to admit you're wrong, which you are. A closed mind is never a good thing.
@rockermanmatt lol i really cant belive how dumb some people when Larry said "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse, are are you saying that what he really meant was maybe the smartest thing is to pull out any firefighters or crews,pull it means just that no matter if it was with cables or explosives,when he said pull it he was on about it the building come on gezzzzzzz,
@rockermanmatt he said maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse of corse he meant 'pull' down the building
(And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse),that is one sentence meaning only one thing
This is not just window breakage. There is a visible explosion on this video. You can see it at :03-:04sec and again when they replay it at :40sec.
In the upper right on the face of the building, you can see the flash from the charge blowing outward from the building face just before the building gives completely. And watch that seam as the fall progresses. You can actually see the building separate completely. All of the supports had to have been removed all at once.
Was there a stairwell or something like a lift shaft that contributed to the strength of the building, on the right hand side as you look at it, that they had to take out structurally before it fell? 0:02 and 0:36? I can't find any plans on the net. Why do all the windows blow out there?
@narukofan2 Funny how the video has no sound. You know why? Because you don't hear bombs going off that's why. Look at any of the demos on any buildings and you'll see how far they are from the buildings and how loud the explosions are when they go off. The camera here is very close yet no audio?
i feel so bad for my brothers in usa.the whole world knows this was inside job but the people in the states still cant do shit about it.this can only mean that things for people there and eventually everywhere will get much worse than police state and martial law.brothers we are heading straight for a world dictatorship 100 times worse than pol pot and hitler.educate yourselves,resist,spread the info.peace is no longer an option.we are at war.
Consider the following: Yes, WTC7 was brought down by a "controlled demolition" but not by conventional means, but, rather, as Dimitri Khalezov explains, by a pre-located thermonuclear device, mandated by building codes as the means for emergency building demolition (same as for WTC1 and 2). This would have "dustified" the entire building in micro-seconds, which explains those "puffs" as merely being expelled dust rather than charges, and also the complete and free-fall speed collapse.
@guzluvtaco8 Only theory is nist/911report with no science, FACT !! *AE911TRUTH* Experts use science,FACT. I spoke facts, your the terrorist, USA = free/speech Get a education kid
@Headshothorror4488 Experts use science to prove my facts. Apparently you are the one without an education, you used the wrong you're, instead you put your and its an not a education dumbass. You're not going to go anywhere with these conspiracy theories
Forget trying to explain it...NO PLANE hit that building, yet it dropped from the bottom down - the entire 911 story is in question but the REAL question you need to ask yourself is: Do you trust your govt to lie or cover up an event of this nature IF soemthing went wrong? Well do you?
at 40 seconds into the video footage, you can see a cutter charge of light going off....and being captured by this film.
I got so tired of attempting to explain the Who, What, Why and How of the 9/11 WTC controlled demolition that I finally posted a blog titled "My Thoughts on 9/11 and False Flag Terrorism - Bill Woollam" Just Google that, if you'd like to review the documentaries, videos, interviews and articles that put it all together.
@jaydogg321 i understand where your coming from man that is really hard to believe, but obviously there is something odd about the way this building fell.. but its a fact that ideas of attacking our own civilians has been proposed before, go on Wikipedia and search "operation northwoods" youll be like WTF? lol
OK seriously!!! Is there something i'm missing here? Can someone respectfully explain to me why it is you think it's an inside job? Because to me it sounds way to bizarre that our government would want to orchestrate 9/11.
OMG!! How can anyone dispute that that was a controlled demolition!?!?! Even the Towers coming down would not naturally fall in on itself. When this all comes out for real the US is going to turn upside down. They can't keep it covered up for ever. The US Government Killed its own people, and it killing witnesses and whistle blowers with fake sucides!! This is Horrible!!
This is such nonsense! Just do the research and you will find that both towers of the World Trade Center and later Building 7 were built with Spontaneous Self-Collapsing Steel purchased and utilized by the FBI. And you thought it was an inside job... your only argument is solid evidence- that's not conclusive enough!
It would be impossible to place all those explosives without anyone noticing. They would have had to tear out large sections of drywall and other building materials, pre weakened the support columns, and wire all the explosives together, all without a single one of the thousands of people who worked there noticing. All the video cameras present would have recorded a series of loud explosions immediately before the building collapsed if explosives were used.
@TimothyRaymond1 Nah,It wasn't an explosive like dynamite it was thermite which works differently and can burn through steel.They evacuated the buildings weeks before which is when they planted the bombs.The government has confiscated any evidence that proves they are responsible and if anyone goes near ground zero today there is a ton of security and you can't take any pictures.
a building that wasnt even hit by debris falls to the ground just like gigantic towers fell exactly and people still believe the original story its fuckin pathetic
Notice how the cameraman scrambled to start recording BEFORE the building collapsed. How did he know it was going down? There is no sound on this video, but loud explosions must have drawn his attention to the building. He was on the roof of a building at River Terrace and Chambers Street about 1800 feet away, meaning sound took about 1.6 seconds to reach him. Thus, the explosions were at least two or three seconds before the collapse started. Typical of a CD.
@dunkindeeznutz Hmm...how precisely did the news tell him? To the nearest second? To the nearest minute? To the nearest hour? I think the nearest hour is about right if not optimistic.... did you hear any different? THIS cameraman knew a few seconds before the collapse and struggled frantically to focus and zoom out in time.
@dunkindeeznutz Well, it is one thing to say "it's going to fall sometime today" and quite another to count down 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 and be right. THIS cameraman must have heard something much more like a countdown or some preliminary explosions to do what he did, quickly refocus on WTC7 and zoom out. The first few frames of his complete video were zoomed in all the way on the street near WTC7. Then he quickly focused on WTC7 before the collapse. SOMETHING warned him just a few seconds in advance
evidence? Burning fuel cant blow up a lobby, burned out at the crash. People heard many explosions in lower floors. I bet u believe the nist report that used no science to get a assumption, a theory , nothing is backed by science & goes against physics. U believe that 5 small fires on the top of #7 melted every beam at the same time to cause a demo like collapse & other building fires burned on every floor much worse/longer & no collapse ever in history.
Many experts/ demo experts say that every beam must have gave at the same time for a collapse like that to happen. AE911TRUTH* Has many Experts ,structural engineers,demo experts,architects firemen ect ect who u should listen to cause there Experts not kids on u tube with uneducated opinions and are mentally challenged compared to a knowledgeable Expert. Experts or uneducated kids on u tube ? I pick the educated Expert using science. U a Engineer ?
@Headshothorror4488 Yes I am actually, but there are many different possible causes, only a terrorist would make theories like you sir. Do you want me to turn you in to the F.B.I?
The building 7 collapse is extremely suspicious, but that doesn't mean the government did it. It could be that terrorists planted explosives in that building and our government is just trying to cover that up.
@NCsqrlkiller You are right. The big question is WHO were the terrorists. Sorry, terrists, or terrace if you are GWB. Israelis call them tell-all-ists. Some towel heads in a cave in Afghanistan? Could THEY get into WTC7? Could I have gotten into WTC7? Don't think so, and I am of English and German ancestry. Someone had to know about the electrical substation. Someone had to have fake IDs to get in and "work" in the substation. I do not know who they were but I don't think they wore towels.
man the ppl who made that building did a pretty lousy job.Like what some deris came off the other building and hit the roof and all the columes and pillars holding the building up just fell?i geuss americans cant build building that can stand some debris hiting its roof.either that or something else was going on.i find it hard to beleive the gov would kill there ppl.but you cant deny that it looks suspisious.i mean weak asss building and all the columes and pillars gave out at the same time
@green67blink66 it was designed not by an american engineer but by a foreigner just like you....and built through union labor so it was skilled ......you illiterate fool!!!!!!!!!!
If you belive that 9 11 was not a staged event then you really are not reaady to be let out of the matrix ask your self. Why was there not a plane wreckage in Shanksvill Pa?
Answer because that plane was shot down. If you dare look up a documentary called Zeitgeist look at both versions I bet you will never be the same again. We have been lied to.
If you belive that 9 11 was not a staged event then you really are not reaady to be let out of the matrix ask your self. Why was there not a plane wreckage in Shanksvill Pa?
Answer because that plane was shot down. If you dare look up a documentary called Zeitgeist look at both versions I bet you will never be the same again. We have been lied to.
anyone ever wonder... is Building 7 where they set off the charges for the twin towers...i mean front row seats... just far enough away to avoid total destruction from falling towers... pack everything up and walk away and destroy the evidence after lunch?
There is an incredibly defensive scam article at Wikipedia regarding the deliberate blasting or 'pulling' of Building 7. If it has been altered, check it in its history as of today, 2011-02-20. Search in Wikipedia using the key words "Building 7". To quote: "The collapse of 7 World Trade Center is remarkable because it was the first known instance of a tall building collapsing primarily as a result of uncontrolled fires." What's remarkable is this level of editorial deceit at Wikipedia.
yes it was Larry Silverstien even said he wanted to pull it end of story
ConstructionCentral 1 week ago
@bennythebearful My people are ignorant and apathetic. Plain and simply put, stupid. America will fall like Rome. Corrupt officials shall turn the United States into an oligarchy. To future civilizations America will be just another history lesson on how complacent citizens allowed their rights to be stripped of them. It is sickening.
MiniT31 1 week ago
Interestingly,there's a video showing window washers on the side of Building 7 with (WTC 1 smoking in the background) that shows them exactly in the spot where the side is seen blowing out in this video.
waitew 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Lol, SURE, it was the terrorists alright. You let a bunch of sand maggots crawl all the way to your country, and SOME HOW, THEY, Fucking did this. LOL, so basicly YOU GOT OWNED by people that wipes their ass with sand. USA is pathetic, and your children will LOVE the 9/11 fairy tales for years and years. Tell them how weak you and your buildings truely are for.
The rest of the world laughs at you USA. You are the laughing stock of the whole world.
RoboBagons 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
RoboBagons 4 weeks ago
Man im not sure if this was a controlled demo, but this sure looks like it. MY country the USA, has done so much bullshiting and covering up that is makes me sick.
If I had to pick between the two, id say it was a controlled demo. Fuck my government.
Clean House
MLGCODSTER24 1 month ago 2
@MegaYeshua33 The video was shot from the roof of a building near on Chambers Street near the river. The video starts zoomed way in at the base of WTC7. The cameraman's attention was attracted by explosions or sounds of beginning collapse, so he zoomed out, frantically trying to get the whole structure in view.
Skeptic121 2 months ago
It looks like a weather balloon to me.
fywacia 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Has any building in HISTORY ever fallen like the three WTC towers on 911.... for any reason EVER?? Americans are unbelievably controlled gullible little peasants to allow their government to get away with this.
bennythebearful 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NO NO NO...it was the wind. It's very strong and EVERYBODY knows, for a fact, that the wind knocks buildings down. I herd someone somewhere say something like that, I think.
JusticeForSome 2 months ago
the other side of the building?
anyone?
RavingRaichu007 2 months ago
Excellent i bet this shut the mouths of many many blithering idiots who cant help themselves defending the killers responsible
777thefreedomfighter 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
These guys come at it from a science perspective.
Frankly, I think they are on to something.
9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out
watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ
ewingsco 3 months ago
/watch?v=LQYFABSlCQ4&feature=channel_video_title wait i send u more
zelenko2 3 months ago
random flashes and bright flash at 6 seconds on the left hand side! - sorry if you think this is not a controlled demolition..... there is something wrong with you
sammysyrett 3 months ago
thats totaly convinced me, and im totaly looking forward to geting a visit from Santa this christmas
SenserAwe 3 months ago
NWO scumbags will burn in hell for this mass murder for sure!!!
ufoimtc 4 months ago
READ! Seientific American oct 2011 issue /page 42... US Geologists and pentagon have scanned Afghanistan and found rare earth minerals for 7,4 billion$ and 82 billion$ on other minerals. They are building rail tracks across the country and wtc had to fall in order to go there.. Is a Trade! World Trade Center. (the new wtc is at Shanghai! Its a cool building 500+ meters- yes try to understand. Read Scientific american and everything will be CRYSTAL clear. It´s always about money/power/Gold etc.
candon1972 4 months ago 8
@candon1972 and there GOD spells GOLD OIL AND DRUGS
777thefreedomfighter 2 months ago
@777thefreedomfighter yes opium production is up 1000% ( good for CIA)and the natural gas from north/russia can also pass now to the ocean.... maybe yemen/iran/pakistan is nxt? Monopoly big boy´s game. The US don´t touch north korea- they belong to china. Crazy world and 2 billion people need a simole house and food, while superrich have trillions. A lot will happen.
candon1972 2 months ago
@candon1972 It's costing us 2 billion dollars a day to run our millitary. It's 2011 so thats 7.3 trillion dollars in ten years vs. your 156 billion for unamed secret minerals. Not to mention the cost to stage such a big terrorist plot, the cost of the railways, or the repairs in New York and loss of life. Besisdes Bush is already rich. It just seems a little farfecthed to me. I bet you also believe in the secret underground oil pipelines and chemtrails.
peanutman5240 1 month ago
truthers are Experts with degrees,Fact !! Not uneducated trolls, *ae911truth* GO
Headshothorror4488 4 months ago
I have googled world trade center 7 and it comes up with 2 buildings that look abit different?
AgothInnCloth 4 months ago
for anyone who thinks the usa gov would not do such a thing as 911 or kill its own just look at Gulf of Tonkin incident that got the usa involved in the Vietnam war it was not hit by a torpedo the second time; there was simply a mistake in the radar transmission). President Johnson used these events as an excuse to allow American troops to be sent to engage in war against North Vietnam,an excuse to enter the war
MarkAntony123t 4 months ago
If your goal is the truth, then you must never stifle debate, if you find yourself stifling debate, then there is a good chance your position is bullshit. Free people always ask questions, and always demand truth.
filmmaker58 4 months ago
Yup it was controlled demolition oh well the government did it and theres nothing we can do about it we just have to live with it. Now lets watch some exciting television. Who wants to be a millionaire, or american idol, Ill go with dancing with the stars
bio3dx 4 months ago
am i the only one seing all the blast points all the way up the tower at the same time
that definatly a controled demolition .thats exactly how it should look
TheCristo68 4 months ago 11
Comment removed
JusticeForSome 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheCristo68 it's the wind. Because everyone knows that our Government doesn't know how to do this(very simple) type of demolition. It's Impossible...that's what the TV said.
JusticeForSome 2 months ago
@TheCristo68 Shattering glass in a weak section of the building is SHATTERING GLASS! There were no explosions. No flashes of light, and WHY wouldn't there be explosions on the levels above or below the area in question if THAT'S how it should look? Damn, you people are so pathetic and will cling to anything. Please, give me your background in controlled demolition?
19nisey69 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@19nisey69 Same thing to you .Please, give me your background in controlled demolition? As far as being pathetic , i'm not the sheep here willing to beleive blindly what the mainstream media and your goverment spoon feed you .Use your eyes , they don't lie .What your are looking at is exactly that , a controled demolition . If you had no idea what building this was and saw it for the first time you would say , controled demolition .when goverment tell you its not, you can't see for yourself .
TheCristo68 1 month ago
@TheCristo68 it is true that buildings that aren't controlled don't collapse so perfectly and even the twin towers the same thing can be said, but what you saw could be the dust exiting air ducts that go along an elevator shaft
sam23696 14 hours ago
Woot retarded truthers are retarded.
lulhoofd1 4 months ago
The people who really think a little bbq fire caused the collapse are a bunch of idiots...
if a blind man would smell this video he would say:
DEMO-FUCKING-LITION
Ghiani16 4 months ago
I still have yet to hear one person come up with one reason WHY anyone would want to blow this building up. Or am I asking a stupid question? Everyone gets so carried away with "It was controlled demolition; No it wasn't..." that no one can explain the possible incentive.
If someone (a former employee for example) said, "This office building contained 500 secret CIA files about the Bush administration's ties to the Saudi government", I might jump on the wagon and scream "smoking gun"...
billykid84 4 months ago
@billykid84 It is a valid question,and I am not entirely sure, but when most people don't even know Bld 7 collapsed because the media doesn't cover it and the fact that the 9/11 report does not once mention it, it begs a few questions in my books.
maleman6344 4 months ago
@maleman6344 The media did mention it, due to a mistake the BBC mentioned it before it even collapsed - now that's reporting!
The 9/11 comission did not mention WTC7 because it was not attacked and there were no deaths. The report was not set up to examine everything; just what happened, why it happened and how how it could happen.
There's no question on 9/11 that can't be answered rationally without the need for 'conspiracies'.
rockermanmatt 4 months ago
@billykid84 Incentives don't matter when it comes to these nutty conspiracy theorists! They get all there news from Alex Jones and fox! Plus they make up shit like the moon landing was faked and that the holocaust was a hoax. Trust me they don't think of incentive. They just probably think that people have nothing better to do so they go"Hm... What can i do today?. Um i know!!! I'll blow up the world trade center but i have to fake the moon landing first!!!". Lol.
TheUnbiasedGamer 4 months ago
@TheUnbiasedGamer If your goal is the truth, then you should never stifle debate. Why would any reasonable intelligent person's goal not be the truth?
filmmaker58 4 months ago
@filmmaker58 The truth? Lol!!! You're set in your ways in thinking that people have nothing better to do other then plant explosives in a building in public for no apparent reason what so ever and kill tons of people, Then blame it on Osama Binladen.and of course Osama was okay with that because he also had nothing better to do but go along with George W. Bush(The president of the country he hates) and do him a solid by lying and saying he did it. The things boredom can do to people. Jeesh!
TheUnbiasedGamer 4 months ago
@billykid84 Thats a great question that would be important for a genuine investigation of the event to answer. Unfortunately none has occurred, and sadly most people are opposed to it occurring also.
doctorr2 4 months ago
how do we know that terrorists didnt set up the explosives?
OUTLAW412BONE 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out, Full-length, Pre-Release Version
It schools trolls and shames shills :)
watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ
ewingsco 4 months ago
New video footage 10x closer then that clip just surfaced is being played on youtube and has gotten pulled almost as soon as its put up....DAMNING FOOTAGE
azascan 4 months ago
@azascan It was fake.
watch?v=OBKix7iMbCQ&feature=channel_video_title
world911truth(DOT)org/fake-new-building-7-video/
annuity100 4 months ago
If the side that faced the WTC was badly damaged and had a chunk missing, that would be asymmetrical damage, and you'd expect it to lean toward the damaged side, and do something more like falling over. But as you can see, it came down symmetrically. I think it was simply overcome by despair at the events of the day, and just gave up.
mollyfurie 4 months ago
If the side that faced the WTC was badly damaged and had a chunk missing, that would be asymmetrical damage, and you'd expect it to lean toward the damaged side, and do something more like falling over. But as you can see, it came down symmetrically. I think it was simply overcome by despair at the events of the day, and just gave up.
mollyfurie 4 months ago
911 marks the day the US and Israel killed 3000 Americans on US soil as a pretext to go and kill millions more in other countries and all for the Greater Israel.
foonyah 4 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
WE HAVE THE VIDEO OF WTC7 BEING DEMOLISHED. THE VIDEO SHOWS THE EXPLOSIONS AND IT HAS THE AUDIO. ...ARREST LARRY SILVERSTEIN, NOW!!!
SEARCH: "!MUST WATCH NOW! Visible Explosions !NEW VIDEO! SEPT 2011 WTC Building 7 Controlled Demolition"
Born2Flesh 4 months ago
All these building 7 videos only show the "good" sides of the building. The side that is facing the WTC is badly damaged and has a huge chunk smashed out of it. You people are stupid for thinking its an inside job.
tubester4567 4 months ago
@tubester4567 YOUR MORE A JACK WAGON FOR BELIEVING THE GOVT.'S OFFICIALLY STORY
calicarlos619 4 months ago
4 planes / 4 buildings. One plane crashed somewhere else. but yet the 4th building (WTC7) still fell. hmm...
Omali 4 months ago 6
@Omali
What type of offices that buildings had? CIA?
-------------
• September 10, 2001 - Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld announces that the Pentagon has lost track of $2.3 TRILLION DOLLARS of military spending.
7brushes 4 months ago 2
@Omali
It wouldn't be possible to crash a plane into WTC 7, it was surrounded by other buildings retard.
Flight 93 was meant to hit the White House anyway, which makes your remark even more stupid.
God you truthers must be borderline retarded.
NotableJInx2 2 months ago
@NotableJInx2 It would have been possible to fly a plane into WTC7 because it was 47 floors. However, it would have been against FAA regulations. It was a highly secure building. Twoofer faggots are too stupid to know that!
Skeptic121 2 months ago
@Skeptic121
"would have been possible to fly a plane into WTC7"
Yes, if the hijackers would have planned to do a little Manhattan parcours through hundreds of office buildings with a Boeing. You fail. Your whole post is a giant twoofer fail. I'm not sure why you put in that last sentence in your reply, maybe you had some moment of clarity or something.
Geez, you guys even fail to come up with simple strawmans LMAO. "FAA regulations[...]" lol! Thanks for the chuckles, dumbass.
NotableJInx2 2 months ago
@NotableJInx2 Sounds like you have such a miserable life you need a chuckle once in a while.
Skeptic121 2 months ago
@Omali dumbass, the forth plane was headed to washington not wtc 7, and wtc 7 fell due to fire and damaged structure from the collapse of the towers
Guzluvtaco8 1 day ago
But there was a car park underneath? Maybe that was indeed a weak point that caused the weight of the entire building to fall like a demolition.
god0fgod 4 months ago
It's really weird. It would have had to be one in a million for it to fall from fire.
But who would demolish that building and why? What was the point? You'd have to explain the other buildings too.
It's most likely not a conspiracy but I remain slightly agnostic because of the bizarreness of the event.
god0fgod 4 months ago
realize this! building 7 was badly damaged,there was a fire burning unchecked,the building was old the fireproofing probably was no good on it, the towers fell because when the planes hit the fireproofing got blasted off of the beams so the jet fuel in the 2 towers burned through it and cause the floors to pancake on themselves,thats why the Twin towerds fell straight down,you conspiracy theorists shame the memory of those lost that day
bigkev2084 4 months ago
@bigkev2084 There is no way it came down like that from fire
AP95xV2 4 months ago
@bigkev2084 lol gov info.....
mixfight11 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I swear white people are fucking devils.
ThExKiDxCuDix 4 months ago
where is the sound?
Nyptea 4 months ago
Ok, anyone come to the conclusion that someone might have wanted to bring down that building, and it WAS a controlled explosion? Maybe controlled by a cell phone detonator or whatever they may have used... Nope, it was Bush.
EbolaSandwich 4 months ago
No sound? Funny how the most incriminating feature of this video is removed.
NRGFromTheVacuum 4 months ago
It collapsed i am from chile and i think that conspiracy theorists are kids who cannot grasp the fact that they are not safe from the outside world, they have to believe that for something like 9/11 to happen it has to be an inside job, because they cannot accept that a few muslim extremist destroyed the twin towers. Its just a weird form of patriotism but the sad part of it is that here in south america conspiracy theories are accepted as facts and they undermine the image of the united states
actraiser2 4 months ago
Either the last commenter is out of his mind or never took high school physics. Buildings can't collapse perfectly into their own footprint without explosives. It 100% was controlled demolition.
WTC7WasPulled 4 months ago 13
@WTC7WasPulled actually it probably could because if u remember there was a parking lot under and tunnels throughout the underground of the the trade center buildings, such as this one. When the twin towers collapsed it was around a 4.5 earthquake. This building probably collapsed because of the earth quake, and the beams collapsed from the pressure, and the parking lot and caved in. And everyone is mentioning 2ndary explosions, yea there were cars under the buildings duh, uno they explode nfire
1XMadcowX1 4 months ago
@WTC7WasPulled Collapse in it's own footprint?
If it collapsed in it's own footprint why did the white building you see right next to WTC7 called Fitterman Hall get damaged?
AccessDenied55 4 months ago
@AccessDenied55 damage to adjacent buildings is pretty common in demolition. Google: "building demolition damage adjacent building"
ALITL8 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AccessDenied55 damage to adjacent buildings is pretty common in demolition. Google: "building demolition damage adjacent building"
ALITL8 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AccessDenied55 damage to adjacent buildings is pretty common in demolition. Google: "building demolition damage adjacent building"
ALITL8 4 months ago
@WTC7WasPulled
please stop spreading your nonsense, WTC7 burned for 7 hours unattended, WTC7 did not have working sprinklers due to a water main break. WTC7 also had critical structural members on floors 5 and 6 which were on fire. They also had the possibility of 20,000 gallons of diesel fuel feeding the fire. now please explain to me your vast knowledge of physics. oh that's right, the only reason you mentioned physics was to make yourself sound smarter in the presence of logical people.
illfightyou4money 4 months ago
@illfightyou4money ...sigh.....
CathartikRequiem 4 months ago
@WTC7WasPulled The interior collapsed first, contained by the outer shell, then the outer steel shell collapsed, that's why it appears to have collapsed so quickly.
rpsmith014 4 months ago
@rpsmith014 and u actually belive that it collapsed becouse of office fire????... hahahahahaah becouse of thermite fire i would say...
zelenko2 3 months ago
@zelenko2 No, I just don't rule out the fact that a building with extensive structural damage and fires burning for over 7 hours straight could potentially collapse. You however, are just speculating. Until you have objective evidence I am inclined to ignore ridiculous claims about inside jobs.
rpsmith014 3 months ago
@rpsmith014 well firts of all i dont even know how the fires were started... berry jenings the last man out of wtc 7 was the key whitnes which was killed in years ago... he heard explosions... and even in a video are shown some flashes on wtc 7 just before the north tower impact... thermite evidence are everywhere
zelenko2 3 months ago
@rpsmith014 and buddy there was a scyscraper in spain that burned for nearly24 hours... all other stuff rather than steel columns more or less burned out... but guess what... the steel structure of 50 floorsdid not collapse or even bend... i mean this is the first time in history that a scyscraper would colapse due to office fire
zelenko2 3 months ago
@rpsmith014 despite the fact that there was found thermite... /watch?v=LQYFABSlCQ4&feature=channel_video_title
zelenko2 3 months ago
@zelenko2 I know that thermite was found. Believe me, I get that there are many good reasons for speculation, but I don't jump to conclusions. If after 10 years there is no consensus on the issue, then I'm not sure there will ever be one, regardless of the truth.
rpsmith014 3 months ago
@rpsmith014 i mean even classic controled demo flashes are seen... a lot lot lotl ot of them... clearly seen... and there is a video which shows audio of an huge massiv explosion like ground shaking... and thats just before collapse...
zelenko2 3 months ago
@zelenko2 I'm interested to see those videos you are talking about. Not because I don't believe you, but I'm just curious myself. Like I said, I am fascinated by these conspiracy theories, I just don't hold concrete opinions either way, because there is no unified consensus on the matter.
rpsmith014 3 months ago
@rpsmith014 well one of the evidence is right in this video... 0:03 secs... whatch the horizontal crush of the floors on the right side... there are some classical CH flashes and than on the top a big flashhh...
zelenko2 3 months ago
@rpsmith014 /watch?v=LmsTH9e7DNM&feature=related
zelenko2 3 months ago
@rpsmith014 skip to 3:37... blast after blast
zelenko2 3 months ago
@rpsmith014 /watch?v=6BXPXfNZgW8&feature=related
zelenko2 3 months ago
@rpsmith014 well buddy... obama is just a part of the game that officially started on the day of 911
zelenko2 3 months ago
@WTC7WasPulled
Except it did not fall directly into it's own footprint that is just pure fantasy at it's finest.
marvelfannumber1 3 months ago
@marvelfannumber1 Yes it fell into its own footprint in a neat nice pile that didn't affect any of the surrounding buildings. This was a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. 1600 Architects and Engineers at AE911TRUTH. ORG have all the evidence one could need.
This was an inside job.
WTC7WasPulled 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@WTC7WasPulled
"Yes it fell into its own footprint in a neat nice pile that didn't affect any of the surrounding buildings"
ROFL do some reasearch and know what you are talking about. Google fiterman hall and barclay vesey building. Instead of saying ignorant crap like that.
marvelfannumber1 3 months ago
the uncontrolled fires buckled key supports in the building. Fire personnel reported buckling at 2 PM. The supports gave way, and the building buckled and collapsed. The window breakage is from building buckling, not explosives.
bubbalouification 4 months ago
@bubbalouification that would make sense if the building toppled over and fell down in pieces....not like this. no way. buildings dont fall into themselves at the speed of gravity unless they are, as the owner of the buildings accidentally admitted, "pulled."
CathartikRequiem 4 months ago
@CathartikRequiem You don't know what you're talking about. Silverstein said he told the FIRE commander to 'pull it'.
1: 'pull' is a demolishion term for pulling the building with cables, not explosives.
2: Neither of the men are in the demolishion business.
3: There are firefighters quotes saying they were 'pulled' out of WTC7 an hour before it collapsed.
4: Why the fuck would he announce that on a pre-recorded TV show?
5: You're a moron.
rockermanmatt 4 months ago
@rockermanmatt lol. now now....no need for name calling. you're not the one who pulled the building. but someone definitely did. all you have to do is open your eyes. all the evidence is there. i didn't want to believe it at first either.
CathartikRequiem 4 months ago
@CathartikRequiem There is no evidence. The bulding didn't fall at the speed of gravity, what a joke. It took at least 13 seconds and there was an internal collapse before the outer columns gave in. So who did it? Who's lying?
NIST, FEMA, the Military, NY fire dept, Port Authority, United/America airlines, steelworkers, demolition experts, Silverstein, insurance companies, Mayor Guiliani, every witness...are they all in on mass murder?
So...where is the evidence?
rockermanmatt 4 months ago
@rockermanmatt did you know WTC7 is the third high rise, steel framed building to collapse due to fire in history? the first two were the north and south towers. i guess it's a new trend now.
CathartikRequiem 4 months ago
@CathartikRequiem Did you know the Titanic was mean to be unsinkable but then it sank? Did you know that scientists have just made particles move faster than the speed of light which contradicts the basic laws of physics and may allow time travel? And you think a steel building that was hit by half of another steel building, lost at least one supporting column and was left to burn for seven hours couldn't collapse?
Stop trying to convert people to your pathetic religion.
rockermanmatt 4 months ago
@rockermanmatt things moving faster than the speed of light doesn't contradict science. and i have no religion. religion is as big of a farse as the "official" story of what happened. i mean come on, even the people who wrote the commission report are coming out saying it was a big book of lies. oh well, as the brilliant president bush stated, "let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories." since that would be...ya know...unamerican
CathartikRequiem 4 months ago
@CathartikRequiem "things moving faster than the speed of light doesn't contradict science". I'm sorry, did you not go to school? It contradicts the basic laws of physics which is that the speed of light is the maximum speed. You clearly don't know what you're talking about.
You do have a religion. Religion is a group of people with the same beliefs etc. Just as people have no proof of God, you have no proof of your claims - yet you not only believe them over science, you preach them.
rockermanmatt 4 months ago
@rockermanmatt ....typical debate tactic. attacking the individual instead of the arguement. do you really think i didn't go to school? or is that some sort of defense? there is far too much evidence out there for me to believe the "official" story given to us. especially when the commission report authors are admitting the lied and were lied to. im not going to change your opinion, nor are you going to change mine. im done here.
CathartikRequiem 4 months ago
@CathartikRequiem I was not attacking you, I was responding to the ridiculous comment you made. I was stating that for someone to make a comment as mind blowingly dumb as that, they obviously didn't go to school.
You've just admitted you don't care about the truth. By stating "nor are you going to change mine", you've admitted that no amount of evidence will change your opinion. It's because you're arrogant and unable to admit you're wrong, which you are. A closed mind is never a good thing.
rockermanmatt 4 months ago
@rockermanmatt lol i really cant belive how dumb some people when Larry said "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse, are are you saying that what he really meant was maybe the smartest thing is to pull out any firefighters or crews,pull it means just that no matter if it was with cables or explosives,when he said pull it he was on about it the building come on gezzzzzzz,
MarkAntony123t 4 months ago
@MarkAntony123t I can't tell whether you're a 'conspiracist' or a logical person. Do you think he meant 'pull' down the building?
rockermanmatt 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rockermanmatt he said maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse of corse he meant 'pull' down the building
(And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse),that is one sentence meaning only one thing
MarkAntony123t 4 months ago
@bubbalouification
This is not just window breakage. There is a visible explosion on this video. You can see it at :03-:04sec and again when they replay it at :40sec.
In the upper right on the face of the building, you can see the flash from the charge blowing outward from the building face just before the building gives completely. And watch that seam as the fall progresses. You can actually see the building separate completely. All of the supports had to have been removed all at once.
prosperia 4 months ago
@prosperia yes i did see it.....
Redlocokixx 4 months ago
Was there a stairwell or something like a lift shaft that contributed to the strength of the building, on the right hand side as you look at it, that they had to take out structurally before it fell? 0:02 and 0:36? I can't find any plans on the net. Why do all the windows blow out there?
KellieSmunt 5 months ago
Ya that looks normal... Normal if there was demolition involved. I am not your slave and neither is the human race
dmac861 5 months ago
Remember, remember, the 11th of September
The global enslavement plot.
I know of no reason why the new world order treason
Should ever be forgot…
narukofan2 5 months ago 19
@narukofan2 Funny how the video has no sound. You know why? Because you don't hear bombs going off that's why. Look at any of the demos on any buildings and you'll see how far they are from the buildings and how loud the explosions are when they go off. The camera here is very close yet no audio?
godzilla1077 5 months ago
fuck you lol You have got to be kidding? lol
Born2Flesh 5 months ago
i feel so bad for my brothers in usa.the whole world knows this was inside job but the people in the states still cant do shit about it.this can only mean that things for people there and eventually everywhere will get much worse than police state and martial law.brothers we are heading straight for a world dictatorship 100 times worse than pol pot and hitler.educate yourselves,resist,spread the info.peace is no longer an option.we are at war.
andytsa 5 months ago
Consider the following: Yes, WTC7 was brought down by a "controlled demolition" but not by conventional means, but, rather, as Dimitri Khalezov explains, by a pre-located thermonuclear device, mandated by building codes as the means for emergency building demolition (same as for WTC1 and 2). This would have "dustified" the entire building in micro-seconds, which explains those "puffs" as merely being expelled dust rather than charges, and also the complete and free-fall speed collapse.
StevenKrulick 5 months ago
@guzluvtaco8 Only theory is nist/911report with no science, FACT !! *AE911TRUTH* Experts use science,FACT. I spoke facts, your the terrorist, USA = free/speech Get a education kid
Headshothorror4488 5 months ago
@Headshothorror4488 USA=Control/Slavery
pedrodollabills 5 months ago
@Headshothorror4488 Experts use science to prove my facts. Apparently you are the one without an education, you used the wrong you're, instead you put your and its an not a education dumbass. You're not going to go anywhere with these conspiracy theories
Guzluvtaco8 1 day ago
at 0.5 sec you can see the cutter charge of light from the explosives used
mtruthnow 6 months ago
Forget trying to explain it...NO PLANE hit that building, yet it dropped from the bottom down - the entire 911 story is in question but the REAL question you need to ask yourself is: Do you trust your govt to lie or cover up an event of this nature IF soemthing went wrong? Well do you?
Progfan2970 6 months ago
watch?v=7ttVx4uQZpg&NR=1
watch?v=CwjmqkjwnvQ&feature=related
bernuga 6 months ago
at 40 seconds into the video footage, you can see a cutter charge of light going off....and being captured by this film.
I got so tired of attempting to explain the Who, What, Why and How of the 9/11 WTC controlled demolition that I finally posted a blog titled "My Thoughts on 9/11 and False Flag Terrorism - Bill Woollam" Just Google that, if you'd like to review the documentaries, videos, interviews and articles that put it all together.
Chidanandaji 6 months ago
Comment removed
Chidanandaji 6 months ago
@jaydogg321 i understand where your coming from man that is really hard to believe, but obviously there is something odd about the way this building fell.. but its a fact that ideas of attacking our own civilians has been proposed before, go on Wikipedia and search "operation northwoods" youll be like WTF? lol
hiphopfreak31 6 months ago
OK seriously!!! Is there something i'm missing here? Can someone respectfully explain to me why it is you think it's an inside job? Because to me it sounds way to bizarre that our government would want to orchestrate 9/11.
jaydogg321 6 months ago
@jaydogg321 our government would want to orchestrate this to create fear in the american people which allows them to do whatever they want to do.
youtube.com/watch?v=7nD7dbkkBIA
watch this
pedrodollabills 5 months ago
OMG!! How can anyone dispute that that was a controlled demolition!?!?! Even the Towers coming down would not naturally fall in on itself. When this all comes out for real the US is going to turn upside down. They can't keep it covered up for ever. The US Government Killed its own people, and it killing witnesses and whistle blowers with fake sucides!! This is Horrible!!
Niftyspliff 6 months ago
wow, look at the cardboard building !!!! an excellent job they've done here - and now, no one's proud of it ?!?!??!
i don't get it !!!!!
zoobizzit 6 months ago
Comment removed
zoobizzit 6 months ago
Bank Rule
Americas war has 'always' been against the bank(s)
So even if you do know 9/11 was an inside job, what are you, what can you do about it? Nobodies listening,
Americans are brainwashed by the media.
generatrix999 7 months ago
Make sure you pay your taxes and get to work.
chuck3377 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is such nonsense! Just do the research and you will find that both towers of the World Trade Center and later Building 7 were built with Spontaneous Self-Collapsing Steel purchased and utilized by the FBI. And you thought it was an inside job... your only argument is solid evidence- that's not conclusive enough!
TMusic5 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Richard Gage (AE911Truth) Talk @ Cambridge University
UK 18th June 2011 (ALL WELCOME)
See the featured video on my channel for full details.
cappucinokid100 7 months ago
It would be impossible to place all those explosives without anyone noticing. They would have had to tear out large sections of drywall and other building materials, pre weakened the support columns, and wire all the explosives together, all without a single one of the thousands of people who worked there noticing. All the video cameras present would have recorded a series of loud explosions immediately before the building collapsed if explosives were used.
TimothyRaymond1 7 months ago
@TimothyRaymond1 Nah,It wasn't an explosive like dynamite it was thermite which works differently and can burn through steel.They evacuated the buildings weeks before which is when they planted the bombs.The government has confiscated any evidence that proves they are responsible and if anyone goes near ground zero today there is a ton of security and you can't take any pictures.
atyomommashouse1 7 months ago
a building that wasnt even hit by debris falls to the ground just like gigantic towers fell exactly and people still believe the original story its fuckin pathetic
evanzsayz 7 months ago
Notice how the cameraman scrambled to start recording BEFORE the building collapsed. How did he know it was going down? There is no sound on this video, but loud explosions must have drawn his attention to the building. He was on the roof of a building at River Terrace and Chambers Street about 1800 feet away, meaning sound took about 1.6 seconds to reach him. Thus, the explosions were at least two or three seconds before the collapse started. Typical of a CD.
Skeptic121 8 months ago
@Skeptic121 He knew because the news told him if you remember
dunkindeeznutz 8 months ago
@dunkindeeznutz Hmm...how precisely did the news tell him? To the nearest second? To the nearest minute? To the nearest hour? I think the nearest hour is about right if not optimistic.... did you hear any different? THIS cameraman knew a few seconds before the collapse and struggled frantically to focus and zoom out in time.
Skeptic121 8 months ago
@Skeptic121 well the BBC said the building fell when you could see it behind the reporter!
and then after that American media kept saying the building was about to fall!
plus police and fire dept were clearing the area because they were told the building was going to fall.
OOPS SORRY I MENT DEMOLISHED!
dunkindeeznutz 8 months ago
@dunkindeeznutz Well, it is one thing to say "it's going to fall sometime today" and quite another to count down 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 and be right. THIS cameraman must have heard something much more like a countdown or some preliminary explosions to do what he did, quickly refocus on WTC7 and zoom out. The first few frames of his complete video were zoomed in all the way on the street near WTC7. Then he quickly focused on WTC7 before the collapse. SOMETHING warned him just a few seconds in advance
Skeptic121 8 months ago
Many witnesses heard MANY explosions WAY below jet impact. FACT
Headshothorror4488 8 months ago
@Headshothorror4488 Those were burning jet fuel that fell down the elevator shafts and landed and exploded in the lobby
Guzluvtaco8 7 months ago
evidence? Burning fuel cant blow up a lobby, burned out at the crash. People heard many explosions in lower floors. I bet u believe the nist report that used no science to get a assumption, a theory , nothing is backed by science & goes against physics. U believe that 5 small fires on the top of #7 melted every beam at the same time to cause a demo like collapse & other building fires burned on every floor much worse/longer & no collapse ever in history.
Headshothorror4488 7 months ago
Many experts/ demo experts say that every beam must have gave at the same time for a collapse like that to happen. AE911TRUTH* Has many Experts ,structural engineers,demo experts,architects firemen ect ect who u should listen to cause there Experts not kids on u tube with uneducated opinions and are mentally challenged compared to a knowledgeable Expert. Experts or uneducated kids on u tube ? I pick the educated Expert using science. U a Engineer ?
Headshothorror4488 7 months ago
@Headshothorror4488 Yes I am actually, but there are many different possible causes, only a terrorist would make theories like you sir. Do you want me to turn you in to the F.B.I?
Guzluvtaco8 5 months ago
Comment removed
BXR11 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Guzluvtaco8 damn you got owned! xD... btw fuck u.s.a. imho :)
BXR11 5 months ago
we all hear the explosions moron below me. Also thermate dont go boom kid. Are u a engineer ? Cause thousands of them disagree with u
Headshothorror4488 8 months ago
The building 7 collapse is extremely suspicious, but that doesn't mean the government did it. It could be that terrorists planted explosives in that building and our government is just trying to cover that up.
NCsqrlkiller 9 months ago
@NCsqrlkiller You are right. The big question is WHO were the terrorists. Sorry, terrists, or terrace if you are GWB. Israelis call them tell-all-ists. Some towel heads in a cave in Afghanistan? Could THEY get into WTC7? Could I have gotten into WTC7? Don't think so, and I am of English and German ancestry. Someone had to know about the electrical substation. Someone had to have fake IDs to get in and "work" in the substation. I do not know who they were but I don't think they wore towels.
Skeptic121 8 months ago
COME ON GUYS WATCH THE VIDEO, it's obvious fire brought the building down and terrorist are responsible - so lets all go back to being sheep
KittyKittySunshine 9 months ago
man the ppl who made that building did a pretty lousy job.Like what some deris came off the other building and hit the roof and all the columes and pillars holding the building up just fell?i geuss americans cant build building that can stand some debris hiting its roof.either that or something else was going on.i find it hard to beleive the gov would kill there ppl.but you cant deny that it looks suspisious.i mean weak asss building and all the columes and pillars gave out at the same time
green67blink66 10 months ago
@green67blink66 it was designed not by an american engineer but by a foreigner just like you....and built through union labor so it was skilled ......you illiterate fool!!!!!!!!!!
TheIronmanforlife 8 months ago
IF you dont believe 911 is staged, then you are a moron who needs to get an education and start thinking for yourselves.
TheHKKingKong 10 months ago
Comment removed
DeathFromAbove1981 10 months ago
@DeathFromAbove1981 That looked more like your Mom.
WTC7WasPulled 10 months ago
@WTC7WasPulled Now you mention it, looked more like you touching yourself while watching Sheens Korner. WTC was pulled? so was your baby dick.
DeathFromAbove1981 10 months ago
@DeathFromAbove1981 You should stop sniffing glue.
getbo 10 months ago
5:25PM
Really? Fake.
CrazyPiker 10 months ago
If you belive that 9 11 was not a staged event then you really are not reaady to be let out of the matrix ask your self. Why was there not a plane wreckage in Shanksvill Pa?
Answer because that plane was shot down. If you dare look up a documentary called Zeitgeist look at both versions I bet you will never be the same again. We have been lied to.
georgedjones74 10 months ago
@georgedjones74 ?? I'd assume they'd have been ordered to shoot it down, rather than have it hit the White House?
FckYourMorals 10 months ago
If you belive that 9 11 was not a staged event then you really are not reaady to be let out of the matrix ask your self. Why was there not a plane wreckage in Shanksvill Pa?
Answer because that plane was shot down. If you dare look up a documentary called Zeitgeist look at both versions I bet you will never be the same again. We have been lied to.
georgedjones74 10 months ago
This was obviously a controlled demolition. Anybody can tell just by looking! OH MY GOD!!!!!!!!!!!
jas16899 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HagerBen hey go fuck yourself
HagerBen 11 months ago
anyone ever wonder... is Building 7 where they set off the charges for the twin towers...i mean front row seats... just far enough away to avoid total destruction from falling towers... pack everything up and walk away and destroy the evidence after lunch?
HagerBen 11 months ago
@HagerBen hey go fuck yourself!
HagerBen 11 months ago
Controlled Demolition. PERIOD.
GuyMagicFingers 11 months ago 2
There is an incredibly defensive scam article at Wikipedia regarding the deliberate blasting or 'pulling' of Building 7. If it has been altered, check it in its history as of today, 2011-02-20. Search in Wikipedia using the key words "Building 7". To quote: "The collapse of 7 World Trade Center is remarkable because it was the first known instance of a tall building collapsing primarily as a result of uncontrolled fires." What's remarkable is this level of editorial deceit at Wikipedia.
zunipus 11 months ago
@zunipus I'm not sure if you got the memo, it wan't just a fire. A plane flew into it.
StEaLtHMel0n 11 months ago