These sort of things are quite fun to watch but they are stupid really and prove nothing. The audi is a car which is fundamentally like we all drive to the shops and the harrier is an awesome aircraft which can move in 3 dimensions not to mention vstol and no car can do these things! So what if the audi can beat it in a drag race cant see the audi reaching 600mph and the harrier weighs a lot more plus carries weapons to do a job and not just race!
the peg 105 was put in the mk2 harrier and was in service in 1989 not 1959. As for a raptor, the harrier is quicker off the line as the raptor has to wait for it's afterburners to kick in at Which point a harrier is halfway down the runway. Fact. seen it. Worked on them for 17 years.
LOL the harrier is far from the pinnical of technology, it is over 40 yearrs old and is subsonic. In 1966 when the first Harrier GR 1 rolled out of the factory it was a pinical of technology, but not now (or then, even in 07') nice ride though.
You can always run but you can't hide,,,,,,,,,,why do these modern supercars always try to compete with late 1970s aircraft technologies....is it to prove that motorsport engineering is about 40-50 years slacking in technology,,,stupid is as stupid does,,,,
for a start, the harrier was designed in the 1950's so its hardly the pinnacle of technology! audi r10 is mid eng RWD as are ALL le mans racers, but all modern audi's are predominantly rwd untill wheel slip is detected then a clutch mechanism kicks in and diverts power to the front wheels up to a max of 40/60 front to back. u ALL need to go learn a trick or two...
err, i kinda know this. ive worked on aircraft all my life. would u like me to go into the 20,500 lb of thrust of the rolls royce mk105 pegasus engine produces in the harrier gr5 in the video? or shall we leave this arguement those who really are in the know?
the average take off speed for a typical fighter is only around 150knts, (approx 160mph) hence why they can launch from a small aircraft carrier. 160 mph aint really that big a deal for a modern performance car, let alone something like an R10. i think the whole point of this is to show how TDi power has come a long way and is just a showcase to prove its worth as an alternative to petrol without sacrificing performance like the diesels of old...
I'm not sure what the last comment from dracuwhatever is suppose to point out but yeah bro your cool. The fact is how much technology from a Harrier jet do you use EVERYDAY. Fuck all. But with the Audi how many people drive a modern day Diesel? A few and alot of the technology developed for this car is emplanted into modern diesel engines. The tyres do blow in a Veyron after 15mins at top speed. But fuel only last 12mins.
if you put that audi behind the engine of the harrier n put the harrier engine on half the audi would flip over about 10 times. the harrier is much better!
no joke. i know its raf wittering. and i know where my house is in realtion to the buildngs. i got to see this for real. yeah it was over a fence at a long distance, but i saw it! hahah
yes dirtyDielo, but the Harrier was built to fly in the air, and since the R10 would have better acceleration because the Turbines in the V/STOL Harrier have to take in the air to get the afterburner going, its a slow start for the harrier...
wud be pretty hard as it was never in the sky to start with...if u sed blow it of the face of the planet then yh wud have worked :) soz lol had to say it
The main novelty of the R10 is its engine: a TDI turbodiesel engine, running on Shell V-Power Diesel. It is a 5.5 L (335.6 ci) all-aluminium bi-turbo 90° V12, with common rail direct injection of more than 1600 bar (23,206 psi). Its output should be 650 hp (485 kW) (regulated) and 1100 N·m (811 ft·lbf) of torque, and its usable power band is between 3000 and 5000 rpm
I know that is a old post but the R-10 R-8 and the R-8R are all rear wheel drive so 2 wheel, Unlike the road version of the R8. With a Quattro system in that car it would weigh too much unless they use the same system I have in the TT and even then it would be too heavy, but would be sweet to see that with Quattro it would demo the competition. Oh btw not sure if you knew this Quattro was kicked out of racing for an unfair advantage, but they are using it again in some race cars being the RS6
uhhh no this is incorrect the r-8 and r-10 are quattro show me where you are getting this and audi still uses quattro yes its heavy but theyre engines are powerful enough to compensate
Do you by chance watch ALMS? the R8 and R10 are both rear wheel drive, it would be cool if they used Quattro but they don't and I doubt that they ever will, There street car version yes they use it but the only time if I am correct that they used Quattro in there race cars in when the cars need to remain semi stock, like touring car series, the Speed GT series with the RS6 and I don't remember the series but they were kicked out for an unfair advantage with the A4, search it up buddy
fuckin' stupid. seriously, i'd like to see the r10 race an F-18 or F-104. or do a top speed test... the r10 is very fast, but don't compare it to a "slow" attack jet just taking off.
Sorry Audi dudes, but the Harrier, which isn't known for its speed in the first place, can easily smoke that audi it was more of a race of acceleration than speed. What does that audi get tops? 250-300mph at most? Harriers cruise at about 450 if im not mistaken.
Both machines are fantastic for what they were designed for!
However, if the race continues for another 500yds the harrier would have walked it! if it was a fighter such as the Typhoon or F-16 it would have wiped the floor with the Audi!
And a Top Fuel Dragster would have beat them both to the quarter mile!!!!!
These sort of things are quite fun to watch but they are stupid really and prove nothing. The audi is a car which is fundamentally like we all drive to the shops and the harrier is an awesome aircraft which can move in 3 dimensions not to mention vstol and no car can do these things! So what if the audi can beat it in a drag race cant see the audi reaching 600mph and the harrier weighs a lot more plus carries weapons to do a job and not just race!
smudger220 9 months ago
Thats one fast car! only if i can have one. lol
Raycg2222 10 months ago
at 3:09 it looked as if the audi was on fire because it was going that fast lol
bundoranboy1 11 months ago
the pilot is schwarzeneggers brother
TheMoeva 11 months ago
The ramp is to practice carrier take off's
TheFreshairsniper 1 year ago
the peg 105 was put in the mk2 harrier and was in service in 1989 not 1959. As for a raptor, the harrier is quicker off the line as the raptor has to wait for it's afterburners to kick in at Which point a harrier is halfway down the runway. Fact. seen it. Worked on them for 17 years.
TheFreshairsniper 1 year ago
That car are realy hot!
MoskaL42rus 1 year ago
did anyone notice that massive ramp on the runway? what is that for?
usedpotatoes 1 year ago
@usedpotatoes Because your mom was in an An-225 and it needed a boost so they put a ramp so it could take off. JK I honestly have no idea.
PSNgregiskool 1 year ago
LOL the harrier is far from the pinnical of technology, it is over 40 yearrs old and is subsonic. In 1966 when the first Harrier GR 1 rolled out of the factory it was a pinical of technology, but not now (or then, even in 07') nice ride though.
dragonamt 1 year ago
German masterpiece :)
MWHB94 1 year ago
Dam, that Audi blow the sht out of the Harrier lol.
blueice7024 1 year ago
oh, come on!!!! let's see it compete with the SR-71, I bet he wouldn't win!!!!!
Stickman698 2 years ago
Just because the SR-71 has a really high top speed does'nt necessarily mean the take off would be as quick as a smaller fighter jet.
standaway1 2 years ago 8
@standaway1
Ok how about a Raptor F22 with a Short Take Off And Landing capability..lol
crxdelsolsir 2 years ago
@standaway1
by the way the SR 71 claim to fame is not just top speed. Its ceiling height (practicaly space) and engine strength (enough to pull a liner)
crxdelsolsir 2 years ago
You can always run but you can't hide,,,,,,,,,,why do these modern supercars always try to compete with late 1970s aircraft technologies....is it to prove that motorsport engineering is about 40-50 years slacking in technology,,,stupid is as stupid does,,,,
USAKALAMBA 2 years ago
Comment removed
MELLOR121 2 years ago
for a start, the harrier was designed in the 1950's so its hardly the pinnacle of technology! audi r10 is mid eng RWD as are ALL le mans racers, but all modern audi's are predominantly rwd untill wheel slip is detected then a clutch mechanism kicks in and diverts power to the front wheels up to a max of 40/60 front to back. u ALL need to go learn a trick or two...
lexpottle 2 years ago
Comment removed
MELLOR121 2 years ago
Comment removed
lexpottle 2 years ago
err, i kinda know this. ive worked on aircraft all my life. would u like me to go into the 20,500 lb of thrust of the rolls royce mk105 pegasus engine produces in the harrier gr5 in the video? or shall we leave this arguement those who really are in the know?
lexpottle 2 years ago
Comment removed
MELLOR121 2 years ago
Comment removed
MELLOR121 2 years ago
the average take off speed for a typical fighter is only around 150knts, (approx 160mph) hence why they can launch from a small aircraft carrier. 160 mph aint really that big a deal for a modern performance car, let alone something like an R10. i think the whole point of this is to show how TDi power has come a long way and is just a showcase to prove its worth as an alternative to petrol without sacrificing performance like the diesels of old...
lexpottle 2 years ago
a shame the harrier weights like... ten times as much as an R10
h4ckluserr 2 years ago
yeah and only like 100 times more power
SNOWMANINURFACE 2 years ago
what about the corvette? its a FR
ApSykesThewolf 2 years ago
McNish did a good job.
viewson800 2 years ago
yehh.....But i wonder what the result would have been if it was a rolling start haha
I think the Harrier would have finished before the audi was in 3rd gear
rideXD 2 years ago
yea its a fast car, ive driven it before.... on grid of course - .-..its the fastest car they have
buckamoona 2 years ago
lol at the n00bs who thumbed u down lol!
kallikusta 2 years ago 12
might as well use a bugatti instead
mahis83 2 years ago
"Vorsprung Durch Technik" all the way! :-)
cosworthspeed10 2 years ago
Cool. That was close but give the Audi wings and have them dogfight =]
Lol, "Both the car and the jet are absolutely at the pinnacle of t-" SHUT UP AND DRIVE hehe!!!
Oh, and the Audi is Mid engine, Rea wheel drive, if it was four wheel drive, the tires would probably wear too much or summat like that
jackblackledge 2 years ago
slip180 u don't have a clue all r8's and r10's are quattro. do some home work then come back
pamzbe 3 years ago
nope, they are rwd, do some homework
vblogrsRLzrs 2 years ago
Do some homework yourself mate.
RWD not Quattro!
fatboywheadon 2 years ago
I'm not sure what the last comment from dracuwhatever is suppose to point out but yeah bro your cool. The fact is how much technology from a Harrier jet do you use EVERYDAY. Fuck all. But with the Audi how many people drive a modern day Diesel? A few and alot of the technology developed for this car is emplanted into modern diesel engines. The tyres do blow in a Veyron after 15mins at top speed. But fuel only last 12mins.
Beanione 3 years ago
if you put that audi behind the engine of the harrier n put the harrier engine on half the audi would flip over about 10 times. the harrier is much better!
draculapw 3 years ago
R10 is faster than veyron with about 7 mph but veyron it is a legal street vehicle.
mkoo33 3 years ago 3
Comment removed
grt05 3 years ago 7
@grt05 It's not an advantage for R10 to have a top speed of 400 km/h. It's a race car.
noname69690 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
PSNgregiskool 1 year ago
The gearing in the r10 is not set for dragging
toy200sx 3 years ago 2
against fighters? a subsonic fighter i might add.
peeonu25 3 years ago
you can nearly see my house in the pan shot.
no joke. i know its raf wittering. and i know where my house is in realtion to the buildngs. i got to see this for real. yeah it was over a fence at a long distance, but i saw it! hahah
karlberrisford 3 years ago
Like this matters...
Daumex 3 years ago
Karlberrisford, if you hear shooting on the 10th of may its me, im in the air training corps and i just got my squadron marksman from here, :)
thebravestpoo 2 years ago
haha i dont live THAT close! but i was up there only yesterday....
were you at the enclosed outdoor range or did they take you up to the regiment section?
karlberrisford 2 years ago
Enclosed outdoor range :) i went on sunday, thats the day that i got my marksman :)
thebravestpoo 2 years ago
really? what SQN?
dudeyfish999 2 years ago
422 corby
thebravestpoo 2 years ago
!!!!Whooo, Go Harrier JumpJet!!!!
360almightyK 3 years ago
the car was built for endurance specificly 24hr le mans and it stil managed to keep up
dirtyDielo 3 years ago
yes dirtyDielo, but the Harrier was built to fly in the air, and since the R10 would have better acceleration because the Turbines in the V/STOL Harrier have to take in the air to get the afterburner going, its a slow start for the harrier...
thebravestpoo 2 years ago
Apart from it doesnt have a afterburner.
bennywidag 2 years ago
0_o
kaisa226 2 years ago
It has a Turbofan engine, there is no afterburner on a Harrier; it can only reach subsonic speeds, not even Mach 1.
mrrmancunian 2 years ago
if the audi beat the harrier all the harrier would have to do is blow it out of the sky end of
eddie8472 3 years ago
wud be pretty hard as it was never in the sky to start with...if u sed blow it of the face of the planet then yh wud have worked :) soz lol had to say it
260v807 3 years ago
WTF did you say?
thechoosendude 3 years ago
you cant read?
260v807 3 years ago
I read english, not whatever chicken shit that is.
thechoosendude 3 years ago
Lmfao
mrrmancunian 2 years ago
The jet won
cellarbuoy 3 years ago
No shit Sherlock...
andreir23 3 years ago
who won??
itsmejohny 3 years ago
yeh the cars fast in acceleration but still if they both got max speed Harrier wuld drop the R10
GangsterOnUtube 4 years ago
Of course, it's a plane!
scarhoeld 4 years ago
hahaha, yes it's a jet. :)
hangguy209 3 years ago
Way to have the mental capacity of a true ganster. You are now official....
guppy8290 3 years ago
omg wow that audi is damn fast
EddyWillyJimmy 4 years ago 2
The Harrier has a top speed of a around 800MPH. saying that the car did REALLY flipping well i thought ,.
deanjfk 4 years ago
The main novelty of the R10 is its engine: a TDI turbodiesel engine, running on Shell V-Power Diesel. It is a 5.5 L (335.6 ci) all-aluminium bi-turbo 90° V12, with common rail direct injection of more than 1600 bar (23,206 psi). Its output should be 650 hp (485 kW) (regulated) and 1100 N·m (811 ft·lbf) of torque, and its usable power band is between 3000 and 5000 rpm
deanjfk 4 years ago
Germans are able to build machines
ete0 4 years ago 3
No overdocistri188 the harrier dos not even go mach 1, 200 percent sure
Visgekken 4 years ago
All Audi's are awesome my tad has Audi A8 with 4.2l engine so he did about 30m burnout
swolaciukas 4 years ago
a burnout in a quattro?
blokjekaas 4 years ago
dont be a dick its 2 wheel drive
and anyway why wouldnt it if be
monsieurarouet 4 years ago
a 4.2 a8 is a quattro
and believe me, you can't do burnouts in quattro's :P
MartinValentaCzech 4 years ago
I have a Quattro, and I'm telling you, it can't burn out. It's only a 3.2L A6, but still...
KillMeNow1990 4 years ago
I know that is a old post but the R-10 R-8 and the R-8R are all rear wheel drive so 2 wheel, Unlike the road version of the R8. With a Quattro system in that car it would weigh too much unless they use the same system I have in the TT and even then it would be too heavy, but would be sweet to see that with Quattro it would demo the competition. Oh btw not sure if you knew this Quattro was kicked out of racing for an unfair advantage, but they are using it again in some race cars being the RS6
slip180 4 years ago
uhhh no this is incorrect the r-8 and r-10 are quattro show me where you are getting this and audi still uses quattro yes its heavy but theyre engines are powerful enough to compensate
Calbha 3 years ago
Do you by chance watch ALMS? the R8 and R10 are both rear wheel drive, it would be cool if they used Quattro but they don't and I doubt that they ever will, There street car version yes they use it but the only time if I am correct that they used Quattro in there race cars in when the cars need to remain semi stock, like touring car series, the Speed GT series with the RS6 and I don't remember the series but they were kicked out for an unfair advantage with the A4, search it up buddy
slip180 3 years ago 2
slip180 is correct, no quattro for the R8 and R10
borde049 3 years ago
the harrier is being replaced because it isn't supersonic. Thats the only draw back with it.
lecave101 4 years ago
damn guys get this one straight:
this video is an advertising (or at least advertising-ish) video for audi
they wouldn't have taken a eurofighter or
an f16 because the audi would've been torn to pieces
or do you know any car manufacturer which lets
loose their car in an advert, well i don't
FlamerK6 4 years ago
Well done Rolls-Royce !
trubshaw1 4 years ago
fuckin' stupid. seriously, i'd like to see the r10 race an F-18 or F-104. or do a top speed test... the r10 is very fast, but don't compare it to a "slow" attack jet just taking off.
housesoftheholy327 4 years ago
Sorry Audi dudes, but the Harrier, which isn't known for its speed in the first place, can easily smoke that audi it was more of a race of acceleration than speed. What does that audi get tops? 250-300mph at most? Harriers cruise at about 450 if im not mistaken.
1curis 4 years ago
thats cuz its a plane idiot... lol. any fighet jet would shit on the veyron too.
delyshBB 4 years ago
300mph? are you crazy? 250 is even hard to get to
freight48 4 years ago
actually im sure that harrier can do more like mach 1.5, which is like 1000mph
overdocistri188 4 years ago
Interestin race. DAM does tht R10 car FLY!!
kofib3 4 years ago
Both machines are fantastic for what they were designed for!
However, if the race continues for another 500yds the harrier would have walked it! if it was a fighter such as the Typhoon or F-16 it would have wiped the floor with the Audi!
And a Top Fuel Dragster would have beat them both to the quarter mile!!!!!
H
ICE43050 4 years ago
The harrier isn't known for it's speed; it can't go supersonic unless it dives to hell and falls apart...
Most fighter planes go supersonic; the Harrier is used, more, as an attack aircraft. That's why the Marines use it, not the air force
ToroQ3000 4 years ago
damn that diesel does kick ass.
THUNDERDOMEXXIV 4 years ago
I'M With fofal On This One Holy Shitake Mushrooms
idontknow172 4 years ago
The Audi also has a shitload of torque... unlike a jet
homebrewltd 4 years ago
lol beaten a by a diesel lol
ultimate56 4 years ago
AUDI TDI POWER
rosario150885 4 years ago
No gearing in that jet, that's why it lose T_T
gluthahia 4 years ago
fighter pilots have the best job in the world. shitot
tannerzxr 4 years ago
Damnstrait.
KuostA 4 years ago
what does the audi r10 does 0-60 ?
Arteenooo 4 years ago
it does 0-60 in 2.65 seconds
jamasgabo 4 years ago
man that car is fast!
bababeastos 4 years ago
HOLY...SHI.T
fofal 4 years ago