man its so hard and whats funny is that I have a friend who got a porsche cayenne for a first car and another with a bmw 4.4i for first car and they r both friends as well tried both their cars and im sorry but they're both really good i can't decide!
todo esto me parece muy bien, pero un porsche es un porsche, sin despreciar al x5 pero si comparas las prestaciones y la calidad y el comfort creo ke el porsche gana en las dos ultimas y en prestaciones andan parejos.
I think that these are both fantastic vehicles, and that the new Cayenne Turbo is Matched by the new X5 M. I maintain my love for both Manufacturers, but I think the X5 looks a little better, both this version and the modern one. Alternately, I've been in both, and the sound and lurch of the Porsche is unmistakable, while the ride quality in the BMW is astounding. Both marvelous pieces of engineering. Love them both equally.
@libetta It's that same sort of bizarre feeling you get in all BMW's, where it doesn't exactly coast over imperfections, but it seems to make work of them just well enough that it's not uncomfortable. I think the BMW's suspension was set up tailored to actual roads, handling well with bumps and potholes, and the Porsche's with a more track-focused set up, at home on smooth-as-glass tarmac. Anybody else have an opinion? As the sportiness-vs.-comfort tradeoff is often extremely subjective.
the bmw is never the smoothest on-road but it absorbs bumps and bodyrolls quite excellent without sacrificing smooth ride-is this what you mean? maybe a little less smoother than a benz?
go to hell..because its fear.. and we all know the bmw is the second who build an SUV in germany after the mercedes...so if you get the cayenne GTS 400 HP i,ll get the bmw X5 M 500 HP to shut you up .....
The X5 is a demo vehicle with a bunch of upgrade parts and is not for sale. A 9ff Cayenne Turbo is available, has 750hp and would smoke the X5 Le Mans... BMW is not in the same league as Porsche and never will be.
Well in 2009 bmw are bringing out a x5 m with over 507hp and 700nm putting the 0 to 62mph time under 5 sec making it faster or just as fast as any cayenne.And being a bmw I am sure that it will go round courners better as well.
the X5 M is available now with twin turbo 4.4 liter V8 engine and 555 bhp... the acceleration is 0 - 100 in 4.7 seconds and 0 - 200 in 16.1 seconds... which will smoke even the cayenne turbo S... any way both cars are brilliant and each one has its own advantages and disadvantages.
bullsit test - i'm disappointed in my hero tiff. 43,000 pounds vs 58,000 pounds?? 340 bhp vs 360 bhp? proper heavyweight offroader vs street car that can occasionally handle snow?
Should have put the Cayenne Turbo on if they wanted a track meet. The price difference between the Turbo and the X5 is the same as between the X5 and Cayenne S.
Except the Turbo would have pulverised the Beemer.
The X5 weighs more actually, and does great off road, with the right tires that is, I'd say the X5 is better that the Cayenne in every way possible, throw twin turbos in the X5 and it would be better than the Cayenne turbo.
Indeed it does, and not saying the srt8 is a bad car granted what you get for it with $40,000 is astonishing but 40 grand can only get you so much in a car. The engine alone in the jeep is the only technical marvel, other then that the transmission suffers as well as the stearing
LOVE IT CAUSE I GOT ONE LMAO
greeneyes198725 1 month ago
Bmw x5 was success 4x4 but x3 and x6 are rubbish
dddddddgggggggggg 6 months ago
youtube.com/watch?v=Lo_Yf7CiUMQ 1:18 No SUV beats this.
Churchill777 1 year ago
nice!
jondenker 1 year ago
cars for A1 prime douche meat heads with more money than sense
tominator23 1 year ago
man its so hard and whats funny is that I have a friend who got a porsche cayenne for a first car and another with a bmw 4.4i for first car and they r both friends as well tried both their cars and im sorry but they're both really good i can't decide!
gsharpshooter80 2 years ago
x5 top
broken2711980 2 years ago
todo esto me parece muy bien, pero un porsche es un porsche, sin despreciar al x5 pero si comparas las prestaciones y la calidad y el comfort creo ke el porsche gana en las dos ultimas y en prestaciones andan parejos.
0MTS0 2 years ago
I think that these are both fantastic vehicles, and that the new Cayenne Turbo is Matched by the new X5 M. I maintain my love for both Manufacturers, but I think the X5 looks a little better, both this version and the modern one. Alternately, I've been in both, and the sound and lurch of the Porsche is unmistakable, while the ride quality in the BMW is astounding. Both marvelous pieces of engineering. Love them both equally.
JonnyC023 2 years ago 4
finally someone who makes sense on each vehicles' individuality. how is the x5's ride quality astounding-like not too soft nor sporty?
libetta 1 year ago
@libetta It's that same sort of bizarre feeling you get in all BMW's, where it doesn't exactly coast over imperfections, but it seems to make work of them just well enough that it's not uncomfortable. I think the BMW's suspension was set up tailored to actual roads, handling well with bumps and potholes, and the Porsche's with a more track-focused set up, at home on smooth-as-glass tarmac. Anybody else have an opinion? As the sportiness-vs.-comfort tradeoff is often extremely subjective.
JonnyC023 1 year ago 2
the bmw is never the smoothest on-road but it absorbs bumps and bodyrolls quite excellent without sacrificing smooth ride-is this what you mean? maybe a little less smoother than a benz?
libetta 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
go to hell..because its fear.. and we all know the bmw is the second who build an SUV in germany after the mercedes...so if you get the cayenne GTS 400 HP i,ll get the bmw X5 M 500 HP to shut you up .....
therock701 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
therock701 2 years ago
this review proves nothing, a porsche cayenne GTS would own any X5 on any track
ocean805productions 2 years ago
the x5 was customed
porsche cayenne would beat any SUVs out there
WonDerGirLS0394 3 years ago
Porsche Cayenne turbo would change things around.... its the fastest SUV....
hiranak 3 years ago
yes true...but if you say Cayenne Turbo.....i say X5 Le Man....with 700hp
vagelisAstraOrama 3 years ago
The X5 is a demo vehicle with a bunch of upgrade parts and is not for sale. A 9ff Cayenne Turbo is available, has 750hp and would smoke the X5 Le Mans... BMW is not in the same league as Porsche and never will be.
LostInTheForestAgain 3 years ago
Well in 2009 bmw are bringing out a x5 m with over 507hp and 700nm putting the 0 to 62mph time under 5 sec making it faster or just as fast as any cayenne.And being a bmw I am sure that it will go round courners better as well.
theguy459 3 years ago 6
won't beat the cayenne turbo S
iptra21 2 years ago
the X5 M is available now with twin turbo 4.4 liter V8 engine and 555 bhp... the acceleration is 0 - 100 in 4.7 seconds and 0 - 200 in 16.1 seconds... which will smoke even the cayenne turbo S... any way both cars are brilliant and each one has its own advantages and disadvantages.
methqal2000 2 years ago
how do you know that? is that the x6? im writing 5 months later.
Atoweha 2 years ago
asshole porsche is porsche you shoud know that
camilo94011500042 2 years ago
no no no, porsche is now a volkswagen hahaha... (VW and porsche are merging)
theguy459 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
johnnyzinho0 2 years ago
...And Porsche is a mobile-fish-conserve.....
bixadeanul 3 years ago
vagelisAstraOrama
Thats not a production car.
rehmant 3 years ago
the comparison was fair, the X5 won
aechdlg 3 years ago 3
yeah yeah , bmw x5 is an awesome but that would be an piece of cake for cayenne gts turbo :D
emiblash19 3 years ago
go away ......... first go and learn how to drive stupid
almazrouigemballa 3 years ago
BMW ALL THE WAY!!!!
Ryanbmw335i 3 years ago 3
ha. my mom testdrove both of these yesterday
gRANT1015 3 years ago
bullsit test - i'm disappointed in my hero tiff. 43,000 pounds vs 58,000 pounds?? 340 bhp vs 360 bhp? proper heavyweight offroader vs street car that can occasionally handle snow?
Should have put the Cayenne Turbo on if they wanted a track meet. The price difference between the Turbo and the X5 is the same as between the X5 and Cayenne S.
Except the Turbo would have pulverised the Beemer.
I voted with cash. Porsche all the way...
terekus 3 years ago 2
X5 IS A BEAST AND I LOVE IT
912MAN 3 years ago
does not have a pilot? stupid driver
aderbalnunesm 3 years ago
wow that drift was sick
afroskizzle 3 years ago 11
This has been flagged as spam show
@afroskizzle youtube.com/watch?v=Lo_Yf7CiUMQ 1:18 No SUV beats this.
Churchill777 1 year ago
Should have leveled the playing ground, and compared it to a Porsche Cayenne GTS
macnei 3 years ago 2
BMW X5 ftw! :P
54spiritedwill54 3 years ago 3
X5 forever!
manfred05 3 years ago 3
The Cayenne is actually usable in offroading such as mudrallies here in Holland and is more comparable to the Lexus LX or Range Rover Sport.
SUVs or SAVs like the X5 are better in trackraces due to it's lower weight, lower rideheight.
The X5 4.8i should be compared to the Cayenne GTS.
SgtH3nry3 4 years ago 6
The X5 weighs more actually, and does great off road, with the right tires that is, I'd say the X5 is better that the Cayenne in every way possible, throw twin turbos in the X5 and it would be better than the Cayenne turbo.
m19921992 3 years ago
Yeah, the X5 is pretty good in offroading.
But have you ever seen a Porsche out do an Unimog!! (not joking) on a offroad bike circuit?
I have. And it really amazed me, but I still don't like neither the Cayenne nor the X5.
SgtH3nry3 3 years ago
weeee X5 rules :)
isusje 4 years ago 12
but the Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8 is not a offroader
kashifzaidi 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8 is better
jeepluv76 4 years ago
yeah.....no its not. Don't even think a jeep compares to a BMW
hulbert87 4 years ago
The Grand Cherokee has a better 0-60 time and quarter mile time and I was referring to the Porsche not the BMW
jeepluv76 4 years ago
Indeed it does, and not saying the srt8 is a bad car granted what you get for it with $40,000 is astonishing but 40 grand can only get you so much in a car. The engine alone in the jeep is the only technical marvel, other then that the transmission suffers as well as the stearing
hulbert87 4 years ago
waaaaa are you ok ?
isusje 4 years ago
the jeep srt8 was called M3 killer and after hat was smoked in 1/4 mile by the 335ci wich is slower than M3
Vinialb 4 years ago
BMW X5 FTW!!!
WillyManilly1 4 years ago 4
dgbgbjkgahn,jhfnuhjgj hrnhkgu fhgighuo rfhhr uuj jhir elhehku hfhfh uene dejnjfegd ufgyhhfutyqquj guifjghdshuanjdjncxjde ffjmueuudjfjd dfjdeicjdej cudjdjd djdfnbdnjvekb
DeniseHinshaw 4 years ago
For me, Porsche is better cross-over, than X5.
I allways - was, and I am a BMW fan, but here..
..anyway :) this is just my opinion.
Both cars are very-very good! We just need to enjoy them, in use. ;)
uldis21 4 years ago
oh yeah, that's what I'm talking about baby. M POWAAAAA!!!!
nallis01 4 years ago 2