Added: 7 months ago
From: napneto
Views: 2,181
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is a very boring, unimaginative and predictable cover, they haven't even tried to show any new sides to the song.

  • @mortified776 then show another side of the song. cover it, cmon.. oh, you dont jnow how to play an instrument, thats ok.

  • @138chuvok How does that refute my standing point that this cover brings out nothing in the song that isn't obvious in the original? You need only a working pair of ears on your head to hear that. Now, drop the half-arsed attempts at wit and come back with a solid and articulate post arguing for the position that this is an artistically justifiable cover. I'll give you a hint in your favour: you'd rather be locked in a small room for eternity listening to this on loop than Kreator's version.

  • @mortified776 What a splendid way of typing, now I see how this cover is nothing comparing to your high education... Covering a song doesnt means that you have to twist the original version just to please dogmatic dickheads like you.

  • @138chuvok Thank you, I do try to maintain certain standards, glad to see you reciprocating. You are correct, a cover need not be an insightful reinterpretation, it is a risky thing to do, most bar bands wisely avoid radical covers till they get better. Besides, most people don't even have critical skills of dogmatic dick head, you may as well just pop out a well loved ditty as-is for them to jig along too.

  • Better than the original from a great tough Chicago band with bigger balls.

  • Keeps that great driving feel of the original.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more