Do you think that just repeating stuff makes it true?
Do you actually think the towers came down at free fall speed? Do you not have eyes? Can you not see the debris falling faster than the bldg. Would that not make it impossible for the bldg to be falling at free fall? Is it magic debris?
Don't even bother answering those questions, I don't waste my time with people that just repeat claims with no proof
I never claimed paint chips. Frankly I don't care what it was, but it was not Thermate.
Niels Harrit (the one who claims to have proved nano thermate in the dust) claims that to reach the levels of nano thermate found in the dust would have required close to 100,000 TONS of thermate. (200,000 pounds)
Imagine trying to bring 100,000 tons of this into bldgs without ANYONE noticing?
Explain how they pulled that off, and you have the start of a conversation
Haha, You're not actually one of those guys are you? That theory has been disproven so long ago that it never even gathered any steam. It really was one of the sillier conspiracy theories.
The towers outer shell is what collapsed first. That would mean that if it was caused by bombs, then the bombs would have to be placed on the frame of the bldg between the windows. It would have been seen by thousands. What you are describing is impossible. It could never be done.
Your comments about the gold are just silly and not even worth answering.
As for watching documentaries...I have a feeling that you use that word very loosely
You clearly know nothing about actual demolitions. Forget that you think they enter without being noticed "they are just part of the crowd" BUT, what about the bombs they left behind? How exactly does not one of 50,000 workers notice bombs on their windows?
well ok then lol, I was just worried you were trying to make a valid point to the "no planers", but your point actually proves the opposite, that even an unrelated video shows an angle of a plane that looks like it's missing a wing
lol im definitly not a no planer laser beam hologram nut thats for sure , not even a truther , more or less i find these videos amusing , sorry for the mix up :P
but that pic is wierd , im almost sure its just bad photoshopping by one of these nimrods on here
BTW - John Lear is the son of the founder of Lear jets and a certifiable wacko. He is also a moon landing hoaxer - in fact, he loves just about all the wacko conspiracy crap.
It's nice to make accusations, or play with silly theories, but are you going to back that up at all? How about some facts?
Who ordered the bombs planted? Do you have some proof? Who actually planted them? How did they plant the bombs without any of the 50,000+ workers noticing? CD experts say it would take 6+ months full time with full crews to set up what would be the largest demolition attempt in history, do you have any proof as to how they did it?
I have done my own research. I have yet to find any answers to any of the questions I've just posted. Not only have I not found the answers myself, I have yet to find a single "truther" that can answer them either.
You are a liar and not an engineer of structural steel. If you were, you would know it does not need to melt, just weaken. You would also know that the impact of the jets would loosen the fireproofing making the task of weakening that much easier.
we can stop new world ordeR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wecanstopnwo1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BBCSHEEPNEWS
Are you new to having conversations with people?
Do you think that just repeating stuff makes it true?
Do you actually think the towers came down at free fall speed? Do you not have eyes? Can you not see the debris falling faster than the bldg. Would that not make it impossible for the bldg to be falling at free fall? Is it magic debris?
Don't even bother answering those questions, I don't waste my time with people that just repeat claims with no proof
jeffmay1 1 year ago
@BBCSHEEPNEWS
I never claimed paint chips. Frankly I don't care what it was, but it was not Thermate.
Niels Harrit (the one who claims to have proved nano thermate in the dust) claims that to reach the levels of nano thermate found in the dust would have required close to 100,000 TONS of thermate. (200,000 pounds)
Imagine trying to bring 100,000 tons of this into bldgs without ANYONE noticing?
Explain how they pulled that off, and you have the start of a conversation
jeffmay1 1 year ago
@BBCSHEEPNEWS
Haha, You're not actually one of those guys are you? That theory has been disproven so long ago that it never even gathered any steam. It really was one of the sillier conspiracy theories.
jeffmay1 1 year ago
inside job .... it whas George Bush Bin Laden whit his clan
scareing people all over the world
killing so many people
blaming on the not existing terrorist
how many lies are whe going to hear from USA
moonlanding fake
terrorist fake ,massa weapon nuclair wapon in Irak fake,the war real.
TheKaraTekir 1 year ago
after all i hate muslims , even after hearing this. and christians
lucas503 2 years ago
The towers outer shell is what collapsed first. That would mean that if it was caused by bombs, then the bombs would have to be placed on the frame of the bldg between the windows. It would have been seen by thousands. What you are describing is impossible. It could never be done.
Your comments about the gold are just silly and not even worth answering.
As for watching documentaries...I have a feeling that you use that word very loosely
jeffmay1 2 years ago
You clearly know nothing about actual demolitions. Forget that you think they enter without being noticed "they are just part of the crowd" BUT, what about the bombs they left behind? How exactly does not one of 50,000 workers notice bombs on their windows?
jeffmay1 2 years ago
Your comments really don't answer any of the questions. Your answers pretty much amount to you saying that you don't know
jeffmay1 2 years ago
STOP SNIFFING SO MUCH GLUE!!!!!!!!!!
jeffmay1 2 years ago
pause at 5:14 where the hell is the right wing of the plane?????it just stops after the engines?????just a thought
EvHstyleTaPMaster 3 years ago
Who cares? That plane was filmed in Jan 01 and has nothing to do with 9/11, so what is your thought exactly?
jeffmay1 2 years ago
well.....clearly my thought was that the right wing of the plane was half missing,and where did i write that this has anything to do with 9/11?
just a simple observation of a photo....
EvHstyleTaPMaster 2 years ago
well ok then lol, I was just worried you were trying to make a valid point to the "no planers", but your point actually proves the opposite, that even an unrelated video shows an angle of a plane that looks like it's missing a wing
jeffmay1 2 years ago
lol im definitly not a no planer laser beam hologram nut thats for sure , not even a truther , more or less i find these videos amusing , sorry for the mix up :P
but that pic is wierd , im almost sure its just bad photoshopping by one of these nimrods on here
EvHstyleTaPMaster 2 years ago
More truther spam ...
Denierbud11 3 years ago
BTW - John Lear is the son of the founder of Lear jets and a certifiable wacko. He is also a moon landing hoaxer - in fact, he loves just about all the wacko conspiracy crap.
Denierbud11 3 years ago
Holograms - yeah, ok - perhaps it was space aliens
Denierbud11 3 years ago
it was bombs planted
sindre101 3 years ago
It's nice to make accusations, or play with silly theories, but are you going to back that up at all? How about some facts?
Who ordered the bombs planted? Do you have some proof? Who actually planted them? How did they plant the bombs without any of the 50,000+ workers noticing? CD experts say it would take 6+ months full time with full crews to set up what would be the largest demolition attempt in history, do you have any proof as to how they did it?
Just wondering if you can back it up
jeffmay1 2 years ago
do your own research. come to your own conclusions.
begin with: The Law of resistance.
therealcellardoor 2 years ago
I have done my own research. I have yet to find any answers to any of the questions I've just posted. Not only have I not found the answers myself, I have yet to find a single "truther" that can answer them either.
jeffmay1 2 years ago
fascist fucks
burnthermit 3 years ago
Yeah we all knew it was coming I seen it when those pigs in washington we're elected.
burnthermit 3 years ago
"A36 sturctural steel "
Since you cannot spell it, I doubt you know more than you can google.
Denierbud11 3 years ago
look up The Law of Resistance.
therealcellardoor 3 years ago
Why - you have to do better than that?
Denierbud11 3 years ago
You are a liar and not an engineer of structural steel. If you were, you would know it does not need to melt, just weaken. You would also know that the impact of the jets would loosen the fireproofing making the task of weakening that much easier.
Denierbud11 3 years ago
the arrivals pt.45
AdolfOliverNipple01 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
not inside job... plan cause the top part of the building to come down on the lower part with enough force and weight to bring it all down...
thehunted837 3 years ago
bombs all over the place!!
metalfucker82 3 years ago 7
Explosion does not mean bomb - you can have an explosion without a bomb, but you don't want to hear that do you?
Denierbud11 3 years ago
Not one single planted bomb!
jeffmay1 3 years ago