Added: 1 year ago
From: EnglishDemocrat
Views: 12,994
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (191)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • yes im fed up with the corrupt celts, they have been a thorn in our side for too long. They take every opportunity to scronge from us and we get no thanks for it, then they just mock us!

    Down with the Scots - oatmeal eating savages, booo to the Welsh- chapel going hippocrates, God bless the ENGLISH!!!!

  • @Mr2010weg Keep campaigning for an independent England so!!

  • "As the major parties slug it out, it's the English electorate as ever that will be losing out"? As in the Leaders' Debates on TV where the leader of the Scottish government was not invited. As in that very election where Scotland voted en masse against the Conservatives and the Liberals, yet got them as a government?

    No Westminster political party has ever had a party conference in Scotland. Never.

    Tell me again: who's losing out?

  • Actually you will find that the Welsh are 70 percent dependant on public money from westminster and yes some of that comes from wales but the vast majority would come from England.

  • Stupid ignorant english fuds, still beleive that they are paying for everything up here they realy are a fucking joke.

  • @1966thewallace well we are paying for everything in Jock-land as well as in Wales and NI. There's a reason you all haven't sodded off already and gone your own way, it's because you still can't stop suckling off England's teat. The only thing scotland has going for it is that your slightly less a bunch of scroungers than the Welsh. So go sing a few gaihdlig anthems and sod off on your merry way already, don't let the door hit your arse on the way out.

  • The absurdity of this is that tax revenue generated in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland is distibuted in England. The English rely on Scottish Oil & Welsh Water.

  • I am in favour of the Union by default; I am unconvinced that England could survive as an independent nation, but am willing to be proven wrong.

  • @4libertarianism Why couldn't England survive as an independent nation??

  • So, does voting for the English Democrats mean voting for an independent England, or simply a local English Parliament/Assembly, with the British Parliament governing the UK?

  • emmm 49 billion!!!!!!!!! hahahahaha fucking genius,scotland always "sponges" oh shall we take our oil,tourism fisheries(most in uk are in scotland) away????

  • I'd never vote for a man who can't pronounce "Westminster".

  • England alone, independent and united. The Scots can now have their referendum and clear off - and start paying for their own students and free prescriptions with their own money

  • @DavyTom71 Ha Ha England. Billy No-mates. you're the laughing stock of the world.

  • @jimbob1969

    No one is going to be laughing for much longer - especially jocks who are south of the border

  • This party now has Ex BNP member who are disillusioned with Nick Griffin. Chris Beverley is one of them.

  • England is the oldest nation state in Europe?

    WRONG.

    It's Scotland - you fail at History, chump.

    The rest of what you said was utter balderdash.

  • I'm Scottish, and therefore admitedly biased. However, having lived in the North of England for a large portion of my life I can assure you that Scotland is not England's problem. The London based government have completely neglected large swathes of Northern England, whereas the current Scottish government stands up for the entire geographical area of Scotland. Also, the thought that England is subsidising Scotland is grossly inaccurate, it is quite the opposite.

  • Their should only be one Government for the whole of Britain. The SNP Government are hellbent on splitting the UK. They deliberately put in place policies such as free elderly care and now free prescriptions.  This will enrage English people and quite rightly they feel aggrieved. But how many Englishmen and Women actually populate England? England has more foreigners than Scotland and Wales put together. So good luck England!

  • HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!!!!

  • Cont...Too many of us are listening to biased BBC unionist bullshit. If I support an English parliament with English independence etc, then I at least want a truthfull party in power in England that does not make this biased bullshit up like the guy in this video does.

    Otherwise what's the point? It'll just make English independence a lie based on furthering individual politicians future aims rather than the countries future aims.

  • Ok I agree that England does need to get it's own parliament and it'll likely happen eventually but like TheFatalInstinct1 says, the guy on this video is talking pure bollocks on two points, 1. England is not the oldest nation state in Europe, admittedly that honer goes to Scotland, the Scots have the oldest country.

    And 2. England do not subsidise Scotland at all as it was academically proven in Oct 2010, Scotland actually put far more in than it gets back., almost twice as much in most cases.

  • The twat on this video is talking out his arse, especially the part @4:14.

    It is Scotland that is the oldest nation in Europe that predates England by 377 years.

    Scotland's national flag (White Saltire on a celestial light blue background) is the oldest sovereign flag in current use to this day (as China's ancient flag was abolished)

    England didn't become a nation till after they were conquered by the Normans in 1066, battle of Hastings, as before that, they were 7 different divided kingdoms.

  • Comment removed

  • @jed371 Along with that English ministers fear nationalism as an independent state. Rofl @ your attempts to say that England is too big for an independent parliament, as it's only slightly bigger (20%ish) than Scotland in terms of land mass, and Scotland can more than manage perfectly fine with a single parliament.

  • Comment removed

  • @jed371 "England" did not become England till 1066, thereafter it officially became the 'Kingdom of England' after they were completely conquered by the Normans just as the Romans had done to the land before them.

    Even if you want to act like "England" existed in 927 as a nation state, Scotland is still the oldest nation state in Europe and would still predate England by 84 years, as the Kingdom of Alba (Scotland) was a nation state as far back as 843, historians believe it's even further back.

  • Comment removed

  • I'm a Scottish Nationalist, and I'm all for English Independence! Good luck :D

  • what would be a good idea is that if england is to be an independent republic, then April 23rd would be an ''Independence Day'' (like in america) as well as St. Geroge's day .

  • Comment removed

  • @jed371 abolish the u.k.!!!

  • @jed371 Yet, none of you buck toothed buffoons will even bother to vote your own parliament to go for independence, the fact that England has no parliament of it's own is the only thing holding this rancid union together.

    If you bother to vote the English democrats (they have very little support and people rightly don't believe their figures) or vote your own parliament like the Scots did, then you'd get your own voice heard and get a referendum.

    Sadly though, very few of you realise that.

  • Comment removed

  • @jed371 Westminster is the "UK parliament" not the English one - learn the difference.

    As it's the UK Parliament, it concerns all 4 of the home nations of the UK, hence why N.Irish, Scottish and Welsh MP's are there as they have a constitutional obligation to run in Westminster respective of their local constituencies. It would only ever be an English parliament when England decide to vote for it, about time you sad cunts stop looking for excuses to avoid voting for it.

  • Comment removed

  • @jed371 By the act of union 1707, the Scottish parliament subsumed the English parliament to become Westminster, hence it's currently still just as much Scottish as it is English, you may want to look up the article of union 1707 to verify this you complete dumb unionist brainwashed leechy cunt.

    It has fuck all to do with building a new building to call the English parliament you dumb shipwreaked germin gypo, it's the fact you cunts wont vote for an English parliament with independence period.

  • Comment removed

  • @jed371 Your comments about getting a devolved English parliament are pure bullshit. You use Englands bigger immigrant infested population as a way to say that one single parliament would be too small for England, yet you avoid explaining how the UK parliament (westminster) handled it for all 4 home nations for over 300 years for the whole entirety of the UK, don't you see the retardedness of your flawed point? ROLF! Owned!

  • @jed371 You sad cases are brainwashed by unionist led media like the British Brainwashing Corporation (BBC) and tabloid trash to such an extent that you believe that Scotland is the 'Subsidised' when in actual fact Scotland is the 'Subsidisor' - as proved by academic experts in Oct 2010, hence why English ministers don't want to leave a union that is beneficial to them.

    About time you weak cunts decided to leave the pretence that the empire still exists and concentrate on being independent.

  • Comment removed

  • @jed371 I don't know whos arse you pull them insignificant polls from, but the fact is, even if it were true, it doesn't mean shit, because English people have an opportunity to vote for the English democrats party who will offer independence and an independet parliament at the drop of a hat, and very very few of you cunts bother to vote them, even going as far as to admit they are talking shite with the inacurate figures they show.

    It clearly shows that English don't give a fuck about it.

  • Comment removed

  • @jed371 OMFG! You complete buck toothed moronised queer accent cunt! Are you listening to yourself here? ROFL!

    England is barely much bigger than Scotland in terms of landmass, and in terms of population the UK parliament had no problems running the whole UK (60+million roughly) for over 300 years.

    So now you're saying that Westminster IS dominated by English MP's? makes a change from all the other dumb Engaylish cunts who say it's jam packed full of Scots more than English, N.Irish & Welsh MP's

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @jed371 You're the only Eng that I've ever spoken to (and I've pwned a lot) who says that westminster is dominated by English MP's, which means either you're talking shite to try and argue that Westminster is the English parliament to me (which is wrong) or all these other dumb Engaylish cunts are just saying that westminster is jam packed full of Scots are talking shite to prove that Scotland is running England.

  • Comment removed

  • @jed371 You're a dumb typical brainwashed retarded unionist peice of plastic Germin Vermin Engaylish shipwreaked gypo shite.I would be lieing if I gave you the honer of saying "your the most ignorant fucktard ive ever met on this site", as you aren't any different from the other brainwashed Engaylish cretins, you're all bred the same flawed way.

    You've been bred and brainwashed by unionism beyond repair.

  • Comment removed

  • @jed371 Yes you're a typical unionist when it comes to the flawed beliefs you hold, especially when it comes to Scotland, and looking for excuses for why Engayland don't want independence, very few people believe, trust and vote the English democrats - the only English party for English independence.

    It's a reflection showing how unionist Egayland really are - a fucking lot!

  • Comment removed

  • @jed371 Cont...With the SNP being the only party wanting to offer the Scots a referendum, every single other party is strongly unionist, Labour said in Mar 2010 that they would side with the other parties in parliament to create a majority to vote down the SNP's referendum pledge, hence why the SNP had to put it on the backburner for the time being till the next term.

  • Comment removed

  • @jed371 The SNP can't even get a referendum out if the unionist parties say they will team up to create a majority against the SNP to vote down the referendum you dumb cunt.

  • Comment removed

  • @jed371 Yes it does, the SNP were voted in on the 2007 Scottish election, since then the other Scots have only voted Labour in the UK general election to keep the tories out, as better Labour than tories, even the Libdems would get support in Scotland to keep out the tories.

  • Comment removed

  • @jed371 There is no such thing as 'Scottish-Labour' beyond the lable, they are merely an off shoot of the London based Labour party, nothing more.

    I never said that Labour in Scotland had a large base of nationalists, they are nothing more than London based unionists with a Scottish office.

  • Comment removed

  • @jed371 Nationalistic Scots would only vote Labour in a UK general election as the 2010 General election results clearly show.

    The SNP are for the Scottish elections only, not the UK elections.

    Again, the Labour party and Scottish Labour are both London based unionist parties, they are strongly unionist only. Labour have already made it clear they will vote down any referendum on independence in parliament with all the power they have at their disposal.

  • Comment removed

  • @jed371 Off coures Labour aren't going to become pro-independent, they are unionists, they are just another London based unionist party.

    Scotland hasn't had it's own parliament that long, people are only just getting used to it, thatparcentage of unionists in Scotland supporting Labour was way back in 2007, when the Scottish parliament was barely 5 years old, a lot has changed since then.

  • Comment removed

  • @jed371 Obviously there are going to be a few unionists in Scotland, those unionists are often English people living in Scotland, people with English relatives, Half Scottish Half English or just Scots who have general connections to England, these unionists either join the Labour party for their attractive unionist policies or vote for them as a house holding tax payer. How can they change ideologies when they are London based? They are controlled from London.

  • @jed371 This so called substantial support for unionism in Scotland was revealed in the 2007 Scottish local elections as being surprisingly unsubstantial, the unionist Labour lost for the first time in over 60 years.

    Since the Scottish parliaments re-establishment in 1999, the SNP have only had two opportunities to become the Scottish government, and that was in 2003 and 2007, the SNP was already on the rise in 2003 despite not becomming the main Scottish party.

  • @jed371 Also, I never suggested that England was to decide on Scotland's independence, what I said was if England had the same motivation and determination for independence that Scotland has, then it would speed up independence much faster for all than it's been going in recent years, an exclusive English parliament would practically disband the union overnight, as it could not survive in a federal nation with all the 4 nations of the UK being locally governed.

  • @TheFatalInstinct1 as ive aleady said, english people dont want a seperate parliament and it would not work, as ive already pointed out, scotland and wales equate to a county of england. And on your basis that a federal system would not last overnight, then what would be the point of spending millions to establish a devolved english parliament.

  • @jed371 Scotland and Wales only equate to a county of England in terms of current population levels,

    not land mass, as Scotland is almost the same size as England, and Wales is nearly a third of England.

    You're saying England don't want a separate parliament because it would overlook other regions of England and be to biased and central to where ever the English parliament would be held yet that's what the current UK parliament is doing right now, it's Londoncentric they always put London first.

  • @jed371 Cont...So surely, an independent English parliament, wether it becomes westminster or where ever, would give better equal recognition for the whole of England than the current UK parliament does right now, as other regions of England (minus London) will always be overshadowed by Scotland and Wales, as they are only regions of one of the UK nations, where as Scotland and Wales are actual whole nations.

  • @jed371 Also, I said if England got their own parliament (even if it became westminster), it would turn the UK in to a federal state, and it would be useless, what would be the point of the UK then, it would probably be even more unbalenced.

    As I said before, the fact England don't have their own exclusive parliament (that deals with strictly English matters only) is the only real thread holding the union together.

  • @jed371 Also, the English still do make some decisions on Scotland's behalf, like the recent Lockerbie bomber revelations that were exposed by Wikileaks releasing classified documents last month, and last week the Scottish government and SNP were initially invited to London to discuss the current Libya trouble, as Scottish soldiers are there currently, but when they got there, westminster excluded them, talking bullshit like "It would create a security risk" - yet this is more Scottish business.

  • @jed371 Cont...So it just goes to show you how Londoncentric westminster still is and for any doubters that were out there, it has hit home to them once again that westminster, - the UK parliament, is biased and one sided.

    Check the 'Newsnet Scotland' site for the details on these recent revelations, it's all there, it's the sort of site that exposes things that the British Brainwashing Corporation (BBC) would rather cover up.

  • @jed371 It's only in recent years since Scotland got it's own parliament that Labour support has dwindled each term.

  • @jed371 2007 was the year when unionist Labour support was dwindling, for the first time in 60 odd years they failed to form a majority, not only that but they became second fiddle to the SNP government.

  • @jed371 Anyway it's looking likely according to polls that the SNP will win a second term at Holyrood (Scottish parliament), all recent polls show that the SNP are favoured over the Labour party.

    Even a recent interview from a strongly unionist member north last week said although he doesn't believe in independence he would rather have the SNP running Scotland than the cancerous disease ridden disaster that is the Labour party.

    All separate polls show that Alex Salmond is favoured over Ian Grey.

  • @jed371 And the Labour party only got large support from Scotland in the 2010 general elections to keep the tories out as I've already said 3 times now.

  • @TheFatalInstinct1 all the people who voted snp before must have switched to labour. why wouldn't voting snp be keeping the tories out

  • @jed371 No all the people votig SNP still remain, a large number of them would vote Labour in a UK election obviously as the SNP were excluded from debate and elections because they don't represent the UK, they represent Scotland, hence why it was a 3 horse race between Labour, the LibDems and the Tories.

    So obviously Scots would rather vate labour 1st, Libdems 2nd and the Tories a very distant last place.

    The SNP were not running for office at westminster hence why they aren't part of the GE.

  • @jed371 So you see, getting a referendum and independence is not as simple as that you dumb cunt, especially as all the Londoncentric economy wreaking London based parties are all strongly unionist.

  • @TheFatalInstinct1 jesus you're goddamn retard, the UK hasn't been run the same way for 300 years, devolution was 12 years ago, idiot. before that, it was one parliament in london, which is a totally different situation

  • @jed371 The UK has been run the same for almost 300 years, and over 300 years with devolution included, as devolution is still not full independence you complete dumb fucking queer accented poof.

    Yes before devolution, the UK was 100% run from London

    (Not BY London but FROM London - learn the difference).

    Which proves my point, westminster is only one parliament, yet for nearly 300 years it governed the entire UK, (even the whole of Ireland too at one time).

  • @TheFatalInstinct1 No,its totally different. devolution has made the union unbalanced, scotland, wales and n.ireland have more representation, and as ive already explained, an english parliament would not solve it because england constituently dwarfs the size of them. who would look out for the interests of the person in northumbria or yorkshire. my dream would be a secular, english republic, with regional parliaments, but this will ever happen.

  • @jed371 Germany, France, Spain, Norway, Ireland and Sweden don't go about saying "we can't be independent because we are too big".

    England aren't that big at all for a European nation you retard.

    The current UK is a worse set up, and parts of England, like Yorkshire, Newcastle, midlands ect will always be overlooked compaired to Scotland, Wales & N.Ireland, as they are actual nations, where as what you've listed are only regions of England.

  • @TheFatalInstinct1 im not talking about being independent, im talking about a devolved parliament. i want england to be independent. 

  • @jed371 You want Engayland to be independent? then vote your own fucking parliament, turn westminster into the Engaylish parliament for all we care, just declare independence by voting the fucktard on this videos party, the English democrats, but sadly you're not going to do that though are you?

  • @TheFatalInstinct1 no because an english parliament doesn't equal independence, as ive already proved to you. Why dont scotland vote for independence, if the scottish people want it so much?

  • @jed371 Of course an English parliament equals independence, without a parliament you can't be a nation full stop you dumb cunt.

    

  • @jed371 "Why dont scotland vote for independence, if the scottish people want it so much?" -OK!

    This is where I expose how fucked up in the brain the brainwashed ignorant Engaylish really are...

    Because the Scottish parliament is a currently a hung parliament, between the SNP (Majority) and the Labour party (second to the SNP), although the SNP are the biggest party in Scotland, they aren't a majority, so Labour still has a bit of power to vote certain things down (like a referendum).

  • @TheFatalInstinct1 if enough scottish people wanted independence, then it wouldn't be a hung parliament

  • @jed371 Yes it would, because the only reason the Labour party got a good portion of support was to keep the tories out of Scotland.The SNP were excluded from the UK debates on purpose by the media.

    The fact that the SNP have become the biggest party in Scotland despite all the heavilly unionist scare mongering media is a testament to the Scots determination for self controll.

  • @TheFatalInstinct1 self control is not the same as sovereignty. devolution is not the same as independence

  • @jed371 Self control isn't the same as Sovereignty? When did I say it was?

    It's not the same but obviously Self control will lead to full sovereignty in the long run...

  • @TheFatalInstinct1 you said it was a clear indication of 'scots determination for self control', that doesn't nessesarily mean its a clear indication of scots determination for independence. at the end of the day, lets both agree that scotland and england one day should be two independent countries and end this pointless argument

  • @jed371 Well obviously 'Self control' isn't exactly the same as 'determination for independence', but in Scotland they are strongly linked.

  • @jed371 Also Scotland put far more into the UK treasury than they get back, despite only representing 10% of internal affairs, that means that it's Scotland who is subsidising the UK treasury in London, which iturn devides all the money to the other regions of the UK minus Scotland, hence why Scots have more tha enough to get better funded health and education, because they have their own parliament who has the power to put the legislation through, as they naturally put the Scots first.

  • @TheFatalInstinct1 scotland cannot sustain social spending on the scale, if it was independent without going bankrupt. it woud become economically dependent to the eu. as i said, i hope scotland does become independent but the socialist dream would not happen

  • @jed371 Merely the average typical unionist opinions of the average typical biased brainwashed Engaylish cretin of this generation.

    Scotland would prosper with independence, they aren't vastly overcrowded with immigrants and they put far more into the UK treasury than they get back.

    It's academically proved that Scotland is the one subsidising the UK treasury not the other way around like you unionist brainwashed cretins are let to believe.

    Vote your own parliament and fuck off please.

  • @TheFatalInstinct1 unionist? i cant stand the current union. you've got no fucking idea what you're talking about. why not use O'youtube instead, you irish pikey

  • @jed371 Irish pikey? ROFL! When ever did I say I was from Ireland? you dumb plastic Germin Vermin shipwreaked gypo. You ca't stand the current union? yet you dumb weak cunts have no balls to get independence, I'll tell you why...because if you did, the union would be disbanded practically overnight and you wouldn't be able to use the Union Jack flag anymore and pretend that the empire still exists, the fact that England has no parliament is the only thread keeping the union together, as I said.

  • @TheFatalInstinct1 haha, you're good for a laugh at least. no one in england could give a fuck about empire or having the union, look at the polls, you dumb idiot. Scotland can have a referendum on independence any time it likes, why dont they? An english parliament would only turn the uk into a federal system, westminster would still have control of defence and foreign adventures

  • @jed371 The only thing that's keeping the union held together is due to England having no parliament of it's own, and as this rancid union is the last real vestage of empire left, it's why the English wont go for independence.

  • @jed371 Cont...So, how is it, that Westminster (One parliament) managed to govern the entire UK population of roughly 65~70million (which included the whole of Ireland at one time), (Scotland in the 1800's had over 9 million Scots living there).

    Yet here you are, trying to defend that fact that England (50mill population included with immigrants) can not govern itself with it's own devolved parliament because it's population is too large? ROFL! Dumb Fuck!

  • @TheFatalInstinct1 no, im saying how can a devolved english parliament, be constituently equal to the devolved parliament of scotland?

  • @jed371 An English parliamet doesn't have to be equal to the Scottish parliament with independence you dumb cunt, it just has to be completely separate to the Scottish one parliament (Holyrood).

  • @TheFatalInstinct1 im talking about a devolved parliament, not an independent one. its only the people of scotland who can vote for sovereignty, the people of england cant the vote for it, for them. thats how self determination works

  • @jed371 So Engaylish ministers run the UK parliament of westmister (according to you), yet they aren't allowed to vote for sovereignty? ROFL!!!!!!

    You self contradicting cunt.

  • @jed371 The bigger the population, the more it costs to run you dumb cunt!

  • i think you'll find that Scotland pre-dates England as a nation state for starters, and I had a jolly good laugh when I heard you say that we in Scotland are subsidised by the English, Scotland contributes more per head of population to the UK economy than England does, and therefore it is wholly right that more is spent in Scotland than in England, I do fully back the idea of an English parliament and indeed an end to this out of date union between our countries!

  • @ccsmall1 That is bullshit, how does Scotland contribute more to the UK than England? Where do you get your money from? What industry do you have? The city of London alone puts more money in the pot than Scotland.

    Jocks are workshy parasites and it’s about time we dumped you

  • @ccsmall1 True, it's academically proved that Scotland is the one subsidising the UK treasury in London (which is divided to other parts of the UK minus Scotland), you can't dis-prove academic research, especially these academics, they know exactly what they're talking about.

    Look at the site "Newsnet Scotland", they cover every single story that the biased unionist media try to cover up, especially by the British Brainwashing Corporation (BBC).

  • I'm a Welshman living in England! There... I said it! What you say makes a lot of sense though.

  • mmm i just saw this video and being a member of an ethnic minority i thought it made sense..... when he talked about immigration there wasnt any race issue involved but a point system which i agree with. England is getting to overcrowded and if you want to come to this country you should AT LEAST be able to speak the language!

  • As a Scotsman I wish the English would vote for an independent England lol. They won't though, most of them know what a good deal they get from 'Britain'.

  • @mesmiths Thing is a study was taken, something like 79% English folk would vote in favour of independence. It may even soften this little Anti-English sentiment that has become popular.

  • @mesmiths Good point. Why is it that it's always Scots like you and Welshmen like me who are seen as needing independence. It would be the ultimate irony, probably an interesting and healthy one, if England were the first British country to leave the United Kingdom! What would the Queen do then? Move to Cardiff!? lol

  • How is England the "oldest nation state in Europe"? The constitution of San Marino was written in 300ad and is still active.

    Also the population density of Monaco is hundreds of times higher than England

    Your lies are so obvious it's embarrassing...

  • @basch2020 what about the lies of the main three parties? they are more obvious AND more embarassing.

  • If I was English this is the party would vote for.

    However he said.. "The English are subsidising the Scots"

    Which is lie but I understand why he is saying it.

    It's a well known (misguided) story that the English subsidise

    Scotland, it's a powerful reason for justifying full

    fiscal autonomy for England. I will state that full fiscal

    autonomy will better Scotland financially as it will include all

    revenue raised in Scotland. The latest figures to be published

    show Scotland is in surplus.

  • if you dont want imigration you should try to help that countries which have been colonized and exploited for houndreds of years. Is responsability of the central countries repair the damages caused in the past.

  • Vote UKIP!

  • 49billion a year?where did they pull that figure from?their arse?

  • @m4rkyboy

    All Party Committee from the House of Lords

  • @EnglishDemocrat Oh i thought that Scotland was subsidised,according to the unionist press(snigger), to the tune of 5bn a year?That leaves 44bn divided between Wales and NI.Are you sure your figures are correct?I mean,the GERS figures put Scotland on a 1.3bn surplus last year.Maybe you are over-egging the pudding a little?A link to the figures would be nice.

  • @jaksad You'd do wonders for the image of Unionists.

  • Comment removed

  • i bet the english democrats are secretly welsh and scottish guys trying to get independence. lol

  • The ED is a joke. Instead of turning the UK into a federal state, let's retain devolved national assembles but replace their members with the MPs of that region. English MPs, meeting once every four weeks at Westminster, and a mainly elected House of Lords. How could it be fairer?

  • Their information is wrong. This is utter BS. "Let's brake the whole country up, infact let's put a fence round London because that is where all the money is... then we can put a fence round each city and all hate each other" TWATS!!

  • @jaksad

    You can kinda see why this party had appeared. with the SNP mouthing off, the english are getting hacked off. if the celtics wernt so anti union then there would be no issues. can you imagine what would happen to scotland if we cut their money. they are getting a free ride

  • @njk45 Sorry, no,. SNP only have a few seats in Scotland.. most Scotts do not want to brake the up the union.. neither do most English people. Saying Scotland get more than their share is not accurate. if we were to be separate.. we would control the north sea oil.. that would make us one of the richest nations in Europe. But i still would not brake from Westminster.. I think it's a bad idea.. any nationalism is.. next they will want blacks out.. trust me these fuckers are scum.

  • @jaksad Scuse me? The SNP are vehemently anti-racist. They had the first non-white politician in Holyrood. Recently I read an article saying Asians in Scotland were twice as likely to support independence than Scotland born Scots - maybe they are not as narrow-minded as people like you. Do you live under a rock?

  • Comment removed

  • @jaksad Ha see how far that got you! You can't just blindly publish hate propaganda and expect to get away with it - you're only a mortal like the rest of us. I see you have made a mess of this, having a good few comments deleted. You can't spell either, I've noticed. You are also English pretending to be Scottish, aren't you? Why?

  • @19alba87 I was born and bred in Port Glasgow Scotland and I am very proud of that. It's not hate propaganda. It's an ANTI hate message. Yes I deleted a few comments as I made some typos. I am not a unionist and never have been, but I know and understand how politics work and braking up the union would be a disaster. I won't be commenting on this any further. So you now have free will to talk shite.

  • @njk45 How would you like it if we stopped paying our taxes then? That includes the taxes which come from the oil in our waters. Then the treasury in London wouldn't even have the money to give back to us. Simples. Do you honestly think it's a one-way street and we don't put any money into the big pot in London? D'OH!

  • What we need is a Federal system, where the UK remains united under Westminster, but with devolved parliaments in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. The (devolved) state parliaments will have equal powers over health, education, transport, etc. leaving Westminster in charge of foreign policy, defence and other such matters.

  • independent england is pointless, we are pretty much in contol of the uk in the first place

  • @wilt582

    yea but all about all the money scotland has from England. they should be self sufficient rather then sponging off us.

  • I'm Scottish, and I agree. Lets have independence for us all and remain good friends as allies

  • Try looking at the English Democrats manifesto, then decide.

  • Comment removed

  • I agree with the idea of English devolution, but they're just right wing reactionary nationalists as opposed to civic nationalists like the SNP or Plaid Cymru so I'd never vote for them.

  • @Mattspageofapathy You see that's hypocrisy right there. what you are saying is it's ok to be a nationalist as long as your Scottish or welsh., But if you happen to be English and a nationalist you are some right wing Nazi.

  • @CRUClO I was talking about the parties, I am English, my point is that the English Democrats are basically UKIP but anti-unionist.

  • in an ideal world blair gave our country away then left us laughing blair done what hitler counldnt he destroyed the uk

  • Pity this party isn't standing where i live. Their easily my first choice. English freedom from the pointless union.

  • your well right but we need the north sea version

  • Comment removed

  • Nice video and makes sense, good luck in the election.

  • "Oldest nation state in Europe"? Shome mishtake, shurely?

  • @fucksocks it's quite possible that they've gone for a quick wikipedia; Portugal says "establishment of the Kingdom recognized in 1143 and the stabilization of its borders by 1249" whereas England says "England became a unified state in AD 927." Portugal do claim to be the oldest nation-state in Europe, but I'm no expert...

  • thanks for the giggles fellas!

  • whoa, what a lame political party. Good luck with your riduculous schemes for world domination. I'd like to see you retain that golden 1 seat you're oh so proud of.

  • I hate sweaty socks

  • the English r subsidising the scots , what with the money u make from our oil u cunt

    vote for independence from us then

  • @roscoboy18ggow The north sea oil reserves some of which comes from oil platforms in English waters, only brings in about 6 to 8 billion a year, depending on the price of oil. The yearly income of the UK is about three trillion. so your only contribution to the UK is not much a contribution at all.

    When You Jocks get you chance to vote for independence please do everyone in England a favour and take your dirty oil and fuck off.

  • @ManlnCognito vote for it every year . wish your mob would vote for it 2

  • @roscoboy18ggow But according to polls no more than 35% of Jocks want independence, where as 50% of English people polled want an end to the union.

    I'm beginning to think Scots are all wind and piss.

  • yeah, Scotlands subsidised the english for too long, and let the english have thier own way.... we have given you WAAAAYYYY too much... OUR OIL, OUR SHIPYARDS, OUR STEELWORKS, OUR BANKING SYSTEM, OUR INVENTINS, OUR COUNTRY, YOU ENGLISHED ROBBED US FOR TOO LONG, AND WHILE YOUR AT IT,

  • GIVE US BACK OUR FISHERIES AND ROYALTY hahaha your royal family isscottish.. go check your history books... go check the bloodline of the windsors from james the first to now... PLEASE VOTE ENGLISH DEVOLUTION!!! but happy if your not VOTE SNP TO GET ENGLISH DEVOLUTION STARTED

  • fuck scotland, lets dump em

  • Its a cool video and we given millions to the EU and they want to split us into 9 or 12 regions and make paris the capital of some parts - how bad is that.

    Its aimmed at the people of England - like the SNP is aimmed at the scottish people.

    Nothing wrong with that at all - so live here born here made it your home kinda thing

  • nice to see barnett-formula myths still pedelled

  • Not really. It amounts to National Socialism, feeding on peoples fear, personally, I just see it as the rantings of a loon.

  • this country is awesome lets see fish and chips love it the soccer games they have kick ass including rugby and plus they dont abuse dogs and skin them for fur like the people in asia oh and can't forget the music they have

  • @anthony12338 Anthony, you're an Idiot. Following me around, commenting on my comments... get a grip. Like I said before, don't bother with things you don't understand. You obviously have no clue about politics, or about the goings on In the UK.

  • im not a political person by any means i know nothing of politics but i am English and i fuking love my country and the pain i felt when i first heard that scotland wales and n.ireland all have there own separate Parliament/assembly's yet we who have nearly 90% of the population are left to suffer we who can hardly celebrate st. Georges day anymore and we who are fuking questioned when flying our own flag well fuk you all we are English and we have much to be proud of much more than most

  • Oh yeah bitches bet this party gets 1 seat max. English nationialists? where? England has identity? no............................­.................Really? lmao

    Me a scot in london trying to find my way to the base in halton form the airport...... asked about 10 ppl not 1 spoke english of any form...............seriously i had to find my own way.

    England should vote for this party like we vote snp but they will never do so.

  • fu*k off you twat - england has been taking money off our oil for years and dumping your waste in scotland for longer.