may i suggest using a catapult for squriels as a bow will just ruin any meat on a squirrel burst intestines etc... bows were ment for larger game deer etc ? but good luck ,if you want a catapult ill send you one made from british hazel kicks out around 375fps i make them just let me know happy hunting
@MultiCube69 sorry dude, already did yours and it was awful. I know you hate your life, you're probably borderline suicidal... exactly why you sit online and post comments about what other people do because you don't do anything yourself....
I dont wonna be a .... litlle squirrel.Guy dont you know that animals knows what``s death and have mind as us?See the last scientific study,Please let them in peace.Funnyest is to love them.Shoot something else.this tells you one stupid that did this before and stoped not becouse scient but becouse death``s view
Lol some people are just so obsessed over how 'good' new tech is, that they fail to realize that old-school stuff is just so much more fun. I mean, who wants a stupid rifle that takes the skill out of hunting? Killing with a bow is much more of an accomplishment.
A rifle does not take the skill out of hunting by any means, it requires it's own set of skills to use. It's also a much more merciful and quick death for the animal. What kind of hunter are you to make an animal suffer and thrash about so much when it doesn't need to, so you can feel like you accomplished something?
Squirrels are open to hunt from Sept. to Feb. in New York State with a small game license. Red squirrels are unprotected and legal to hunt year round as they are viewed as vermin. I shoot the little buggers every chance I get. Not only have I had multiple accounts of them nesting in destroying wires in and around my home, there is nothing more aggravating than a red squirrel "barking" at you while you are sitting in a tree stand. Good video, and can't wait to see you bag some.
Do you ever actually hit anything? I mean your videos aren't too bad but up to now all I see is a drumroll and a miss, or are you saving all the hits for your dvd?
@fgf051 Wow, you're a dick. I ask an honest question, and you respond like that?
I've never heard of people eating squirrels on a regular basis, so it's news to me. Try being a more pleasant human being sometime; you might come off as less of a douche.
@MrCarrothead86 thats a matter of opinion, I really dont like the taste but some people do Its a personal choice. I think if I was trapped in the woods and had no other choice Id eat squirrel again but Id much rather set my table with good wild rabbit meat or even porcupine for that matter I know some people may raise an eyebrow to that but porcupine is one of the best wild meats Ive ever tasted. I just never liked squirrel but maybe it was never cooked right when I tried it years ago..
@KILL3RPANA5 Yes, it is called wildlife conservation and hunters are a very important part of it. You don't see the hippy fairy liberals forking over money to ensure wildlife management areas are maintained.
Nope - they give money to fraudulent organizations such as PETA that pocket the money and product emotive garbage that the intellectually bankrupt buy into.
So I've been reading all the "SAVE TEH SQUIRREL" comments and in all honesty I think you are wrong. Squirrels reproduce faster than rabbits.
Stop trying to force your opinion down the throats of others. (Mostly) free world we live in, quit being dicks and trying to make others believe what you believe because you think you're absolutely right.
gret videos there really a change from the blurry images and messed up audio on most videos and i have learned so much fron your channel cant wait for the next vid!!
Flakersquirrels why do you preach about those those tree rats on every squirrel hunting video, its really a waste of your time because nobody ever listens to you so just give it a rest, people have always hunted squirrels ever since man came to be and they always will.
He is a complete idiot going around all over the place bad mouthing videos of people hunting squirrels. Whats really funny is his chosen name. "flanker"
Flank, commonly referred as a move used in a plan of attack.
I would love to see what he would say if predator hunting was outlawed and is yard was full of bobcats. "OMG someone needs to do something" That someone would be a hunter you Flankersquirrel. He wishes he was a squirrel so he could sit a chew on nuts.
Flank is a term used for a plan of attack. In your direction of the desired user name you have chosen and reflects what you have been doing to every youTube channel you can find. No one person except God knows the purpose on this planet.
So your against bobcats? But not squirrels? Haha thats Rich with Hypocritical bullshit. Facts, Squirrels are varmints. Varmints destroy crops, homes etc. Your animal rights activist show is as fake as your fight.
You, OBVIOUSLY, don’t know what is yours – as evidenced by your comments of low intelligence that betray not only your ignorance; they betray that you don’t know yet, who you – YOURSELF – are.
You are even wrong about, what the term “varmint” means.
This term is used by some as the synonym for the GROUND squirrels, only.
Even the ground squirrels have been very useful, on balance, to the environment. They have been known to move around tons of soil, thus contributing to better plant growth.
Squirrels have been FIRST on this planet before the humans. They have the right to do here WHATEVER they want to!
@Flankersquirrels Holey shit is that what you think the definition to that word is? Fuck even your a varmint. I know who i am. I stand for all hunters rights i.e. human beings. You stand for an animal. You are definitely detached from the world and will soon hang yourself as a sign of protest against squirrel hunters. You cant stop it, you wont stop it. And you will die a slow stressful death approaching it the wrong way.
nice video, this is what you call pure hunting. oh, before i go, please excuse Flankersquirrel, he means no harm, it's just that the poor deluded fool can't help but look out for squirrels. it's a little known FACT that he was gang raped as a child by a group of over sexed squirrels, and now all his inner sexual frustrations are taken out on those that would see harm come to them, I'm afraid the poor fuck wit is NUTS!, still, you are what you eat!. keep shooting!!
Hope this is in a primitive area away from people. Those arrows aimed high and missing a squirrel can continue their flight and kill whatever they land on.
great video so far , but when are we going to see you kill something .
And aren't you the same guy that punched your self in the head when you missed a deer . I'd cut that out if i was you and stop doing it or else with the amount of misses you've had so far your going to end up brain damaged .
hmmm im in an odd position here.. I very much enjoy hunting with primitive archery (i just recently killed my first squirrel and then elk with my recurve ) but im also a supporter of gay marriage and abortion.. what does that make me lol
You violate the order of the nature by murdering the tiny, beautiful, adorable, intelligent, valuable-to-the-environment, squirrels; and you continue violating another order of the nature – by supporting the perverts’ marriage.
@tarvalon74 They are considered primitive because they are made of natural materials (wood). I only call them that because it designates that I'm not using a bow made of fiberglass, which isn't primitive (though it is considered traditional). Primitive doesn't mean they are crude or ineffective.
It is YOU, and all the other, remaining gray-squirrel-murdering barbarians in the Great Britain, who should have been popped long ago.
All you squirrel-murdering barbarians WILL pay for your mind-boggling, mass-murder of the innocent, valuable gray-squirrels that you committed in the last two years.
@Flankersquirrels Okay, look, we totally hi jacked the comments for the vid. We are never going to agree on this, but you must realise about what you say about beauty and such is your OPINION, not fact. Some people find them ugly but i like them too they are cute, but they are also a food source, i dont waste squirrel meat or bones/skin. I am grateful that it lost its life for the continued circle of life. And your in Britain? Im in the US and its common in some palces to eat squirrel........
@Flankersquirrels Its common in some places here to eat squirrel, not where i live but i understand what they are, an animal to watch and enjoy and food for some. You take the first option and i will take the second and first because yes i do like watching them, they play w/each other and it is nature but so it them being prey.So can we just agree to disagree and end this like gentlemen? Or if your a woman(no offence if male) like a lady? I'm tired of these conversations & im sure you are to 0_-
@Flankersquirrels Haha...flankers, you little child...you make me laugh. I know you and your kind...you despise me because I hunt animals, but you support abortions of unborn infants and support gay marriage among other societal suicides. Your twisted intellect cannot operate with logic, because you have none.
I despise you because by murdering squirrels you violate the man's honor.
I am not against ETHICAL hunting.
I definitely support abortion for the dark hordes.
When I lived in San Francisco I carried out counter-demonstrations during the Pervert Shame Parades. I spoke many times on the radio against the perverts and their agenda.
You take the life of a precious, child-like animal, of all things in a rich, industrialized country, and say it is I, who have twisted intellect?!
Do you eat meat? If so, enough said. If not, you have to be one sickly looking bastard just like the rest of the veg heads. All gray looking and shit.
@Flankersquirrels barbarian like me? hmmmm.. So you're saying that you are less of a "barbarian" because you let someone else kill your food? That's like saying John Gotti isn't a murderer because he hired someone else to wack people. What makes a squirrel more important than a cow, pig,chicken, turkey? Squirrels have been food source for man since the beginning of man, so what's your point? You contradict yourself by calling me a barbarian and then eat a turkey sandwich. Get a clue!
@Ddubya77 Im afraid so, he is detached. Go look around YouTube for bow hunting squirrels and you will see a post by him on almost every single video. Bad mouthing and threatening any one who likes the video including the original owner. He spouts opinions on his views of why they should not be hunted and why they are important to the ecosystem. Damn right they are important! They are a great source of food. Some people think there is not enough on a squirrel for a meal. 4oz meat is all you need.
@Flankersquirrels The squirrel has been much more "valuable" as a food source. I haven't seen to many people with pet squirrels? I think they're fun to watch too, especially when they curl up in a ball and fall 30 feet to the ground. That to me is great entertainment, so yes I see your point.
As far as I am concerned, hunting is just fine as long as hunters follow one simple rule. Eat what you kill. If you aren't planning to eat it, don't shoot it.
Anyone who objects to that sort of hunting on moral grounds must consume no meat, leather, or products derived from animals (which includes many cosmetics, medicines, household cleaners) or recognize their own hypocrisy.
My position is a moderate one: that the only moral justification for hunting was an intention to eat the animals one hunts. People who object to that sort of hunting, if they wish to be eithically consistent, must also refrain from consuming farmed meat and animal products.
Who decides the "purpose" of the animal in fashion that makes hunting for food immoral but slaughtering farm animals for food permissable? What criteria do you use to distinguish one animal from another?
Take deer and cattle for instance. They are both cloven hooved, herbivorous ruminants of roughly the same intelligence. Do you decide that cattle can be eaten but deer mustn't because deer are prettier? Because they're more likely to have Disney movies made about them?
If Eugenists ever take over I hope you have an exceptionally pretty face because, let's face it, you've shown that your reasoning ability is sub-par. Unless you're sufficiently good looking to compensate
1. Eugenics is predicated on a very specific morality. It isn't one I agree with, but it's there.
2. I never stated all animals were equal. The eating of a mealworm isn't equivalent to consuming a dinner of porpoise meat. I stated that the only moral justification for hunting was the hunter's intention to eat the animal he kills. That doesn't preclude other conditions applying; laws, convention and even personal taste can also limit a hunter's perogatives.
In spite of your denial you continue treating all animals as equal. When you qualified the moral justification for killing animals, you extended that justification to ALL animals.
There ARE animals, like hogs, which killing off – I agree – is justified by the hunter’s intention alone, to eat them.
In case of squirrels this intention alone doesn’t justify morally killing them.
You're an idiot. Just in case that wasn't clear yet.
I extended the justification that it is permissable to hunt any animal for food "in extremis" or in a situation of extreme need, where human life depends on the act. I don't believe that any animal's life is worth more than that of a person.
Sure squirrels plant trees. So do many herbivores, and omnivores, deer and hogs included. And many trees self-plant. Are those trees exempt from occasional harvest?
I will not be getting in the hypothetical discussions of human starvation versus killing of squirrels just for the purpose of survival. Such discussions belong in Somalia, not in the rich countries such as the U.S.
You claim that deer and hogs plant trees?
No wonder you didn’t explain how they are – allegedly – doing it.
Complete crap!
You are using the politically correct, fraudulent, insulting jargon of “harvest”, as applied to killing of squirrels, and you call ME an idiot?!
Yes, deer and hogs plant trees, through the efficient mechanism of their digestive tracts.
In other words, YES! By Complete Crap! Deer and pigs are indiscriminate eaters of vegetable matter. They consume leaves, grass, bark, and seeds of a whole host of plants and trees, and the seeds they consume are deposited, undigested, in mounds of natural fertilizer.
A naturalist such as yourself was unaware of this? Shocking.
I discussed the "in extremis" justification because you stated: "In spite of your denial you continue treating all animals as equal. When you qualified the moral justification for killing animals, you extended that justification to ALL animals."
You clearly didn't understand what "in extremis" meant, so I explained it for you. It was the only way in which I claimed all animals were equal: their lives are worth less than the lives of people.
Because it is IMMORAL to kill animals that on balance have been extremely valuable to the environment. Squirrels, for instance, are responsible for planting more trees on this planet than humans are.
Their – more anecdotal than real – destructiveness to the habitats is just piddling compared to their constructiveness. It is extremely rare that squirrels would kill chicks; it happens only when they are faced with starvation.
The aggressiveness of squirrels to young of competing species and competing families within the same species is well documented. We have several dozen squirrel nests on our three acre property, and I've watched nest raiding and the killing of infant squirrels on many occasions, and there's always been plenty of food available. I've even saved a couple.
To hold squirrels forth as a uniquely precious, noble species is ridiculous. Vultures are equally important ecologically.
I do not believe for a second that adult squirrels killed baby squirrels of competing squirrel families ANYWHERE. Such killings certainly happen – but by raccoons, hawks, cats and other worthless bandits, like that.
Vultures are equally important ecologically to squirrels?
You mean because they get rid the earth of the carrion?
And that’s supposed to be equal to planting trees by squirrels?
I've watched adult squirrels kill baby squirrels of competing families, so your belief is simply wrong.
And if you think disposing of carrion is not an environmentally significant function then you truly are an idiot. Because of that function, which is handled by a scant few species of animals, Vultures are protected by law in most Western nations. Squirrels neither need nor merit such protection, or at least such is the opinion of the Ministry of Environment in Canada.
It is also immoral to kill squirrels because they constitute a great visual attraction to, or enrich lives as companions of, the VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE.
In order to know the value of squirrels you have to actually befriend them, be in their company a lot. If your knowledge about them is based on seeing them from a distance, and reading about them, then you don’t know what you are talking about.
Personally I rather like squirrels, but I know many folks who despise them as vermin. Birdwatchers in particular seem to have a natural antipathy for them, as they bully songbirds away from feeders. Where do you get your "vast majority"? Even if it exists, since when did public opinion consitute evidence of value? Once the majority of the inhabitants of the earth believed the planet to be flat.
Look up the logical fallacy of argumentum ad populum sometime.
And at the same time, why do the random people you've talked to count for more than the random people I've talked to who dislike squirrels? You, in your specific environment, encountering people WHILE feeding squirrels, are hardly a suitable mechanism for random polling. You provide anecdotal evidence of people liking squirrels, I provide anecdotal evidence to the contrary. Neither is conclusive.
In addition, the squirrel population is vast and capable of rapid growth. You really think a couple of marginally capable human hunters represents a threat to them? Any single species of hawk or owl kills an exponentially greater number every year. Hell, so do cars.
Should human hunters kill squirrels? Not without a better reason than boredom, I agree. Do they represent a true threat to squirrels? Nope.
And finally, are you a nutjob? Abso-fricking-lutely.
According to the official statistics, the squirrels-murdering, barbaric hunters kill MILLIONS of squirrels in the U.S.
The squirrel populations in such cities as Seattle gets lower EVERY year, though in this case not due to hunters. Same with the Western Gray squirrels population in Washington; same with the Red squirrel population in such countries as Great Britain (due to deforestation and pollution).
Show me one statistic on squirrel hunting. Squirrels are killed in urban areas, by vehicles largely. The declining squirrel population in Washington state has nothing to do with hunting. The declining pop in GB is in Red Squirrels, and is attributed to fragmentation of habitat, squirrel pox, and being outcompeted by Gray squirrels.
Now google "Squirrel overpopulation" and see the hits you'll get for South Carolina, Ontario, California, Connecticut...
You no match to me when it comes to the hands-on experience with squirrels. In the last six-plus years, I spent on the average four hours A DAY with them.
Pardon me: I did find one study on the effect of hunting on squirrel populations, conducted in Ohio in 1965. The study found that "...an average harvest of 37.4% of the estimated fall population of gray squirrels produced no significant difference in the average annual mortality rate compared with the rate on an adjascent unhunted area" (Journal of Wildlife Management, 1975, Vol 39)
You have wondered deeply into a one-way street; in other words – into inanity.
When it comes to approaching the subject of squirrels, one is supposed to depend on one’s very fundamental, human instincts – starting with the common sense. Your heavy rationalizing the killing of squirrels just proved that those instincts of yours are abrogated.
p.s.
I don’t believe for a second that you witnessed adult squirrels kill baby squirrels.
How amusing. You made a number of factual statements that I've demonstrated to be incorrect. Squirrel populations aren't threatened worldwide -- there are isolated regions where populations decline, but globally there is no reason to see the squirrel as a threatened species, and in no area where there's a declining population is that decline tied to hunting. In fact, the only stat available on the topic indicates that hunting has no lasting effect on the species
@Flankersquirrels Adult squirrels will kill their young, so will birds you fucking idiot. Your quest is a endless one when you have no information backing up all the stupid shit you say. You have a real sickness about you indulging your life so deeply into tree rat.
Anyway, everyone i have a nice little video dedicated to FlankerShit.
Your "ethical" rationale for protecting squirrels is deeply inconsistent and without rational basis.
And having had that established, you resort to argumentum ad hominem -- last refuge of the foolish debater.
Of course, if I've proven you wrong, I MUST be a barbarian whose opinion can be conveniently discounted. You can't deal with the argument itself, so you try to discredit the person making it.
Sorry if I spoiled your argument by bringing facts and reason into play.
Without question, I cannot match your 4 hours per day spent with squirrels over the last six years. During the years in question, I've had..what's the word I'm looking for... oh yes. A life.
Ironically, I originally posted on this forum because I thought the hunt it showed was cruel and pointless. The hunter wasn't planning to eat his kill; he was killing for the sport of it.
After talking to you for a bit, however, I find myself feeling hungry for squirrel.
There can be other limits, but without the initial justification of intending to eat what you kill, those other limits don't even need to be discussed. And, in extremis, since a human's life is worth more than that of any animal, a starving person would have the right to kill ANY animal they intended to eat.
3. So, if you have no problem with hunting deer, are you actually simply a fanatic for the preservation of squirrels? 'Cause, mate, that's more than a little weird.
To a lot of people, biologists included, squirrels are just rats with good PR. They're omnivorous, viciously competitive amongst themselves in securing territory, to the point of killing they young of other families in their own species, let alone other species, at any given opportunity. They'll similarly raid the nests of songbirds. A Disney movie, squirrels ain't.
And THAT's the one species that you're moved to defend with vitriolic diatribes on Youtube?
Another British, gray squirrel-murdering barbarian spreading malicious lies about those squirrels.
It is your British PEOPLE, who murdered the red squirrels through deforestation and pollution of their habitats; and through the outright mass-killings of them throughout the centuries, treating them as pests.
Now, barbarians like you suddenly started to awaken their sense of nativism in a cowardly, twisted, pathological, sick, barbaric way:
Instead of focusing on niggers and other dark hordes that invaded your country, barbarians like you focused their murderous instincts, on the adorable, innocent, valuable gray squirrels.
You British barbarians WILL pay for the holocaust of the gray squirrels that you committed under the fraudulent pretext of saving the red squirrels.
@Flankersquirrels I live in Scotland, grey squirrels are not valuable, they are eliminating our native red squirrels and as such many country dwelling scots make it our obligation to hunt or trap as many of the little bastards as possible.
Another Scottish barbarian, spreading lies about the gray squirrel situation in Scotland.
The gray, and the red – squirrels, in the Great Britain, have always lived in harmony. The squirrel para-pox infection that killed a couple of dozens of the red squirrels in Scotland is neither a threat to the survival of the reds as the subspecies,
nor a JUSTIFICATION WHATSOEVER for having carried-out the mass-murder of the grays, that the Scottish barbarians have committed.
Read (on the internet) FACTS – as opposed to demagoguery – about that situation, from one of the few, remaining Scottish, honorable men – Professor Acorn.
@Flankersquirrels fucking hell are you being serious ! squirrels are a pest they are tree rats, its sad fuckers like you that need to be shot with it .
isn't it hard stalking these weary animals with shiny sunglasses?
arthurroosen 1 week ago
How far were you from those dragonflies when you shot?
rayndalrenfrow 4 weeks ago
anda cagaa.
MrMiguelpp 2 months ago
may i suggest using a catapult for squriels as a bow will just ruin any meat on a squirrel burst intestines etc... bows were ment for larger game deer etc ? but good luck ,if you want a catapult ill send you one made from british hazel kicks out around 375fps i make them just let me know happy hunting
MrKeg1234 2 months ago
You must lose hundreds of arrows shooting up a tree
1000000volts 2 months ago
Non-Americans: People who think squirrell hunting videos are stupid but still find time to watch them and coment on them.
TheSlufoot 3 months ago
i can spit bbs faster then these guns
TheAirsoftfan12 3 months ago
Should've lead that squirrel on the branch...
magicstix0r 3 months ago
@kingk3n94 You go grab a squirrel, moron. When you get the bleeding to stop, message me back and tell me how it went.
dkmgm2011 3 months ago
lol there acting cool haha there hunting something i could just grab out of my backyard
kingk3n94 3 months ago
they call those traditional bows now
RoaringChidori1 4 months ago
I use bear hands to catch squirrel
angelcoh100 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
gay shit fuck your mom
MultiCube69 4 months ago
@MultiCube69 sorry dude, already did yours and it was awful. I know you hate your life, you're probably borderline suicidal... exactly why you sit online and post comments about what other people do because you don't do anything yourself....
primitivepathways 4 months ago 53
@primitivepathways so u kill animals as a "hobby" wow.. at least do u eat what u kill?
xclieateaterx1 4 months ago
@primitivepathways that was awesome. next week, troll hunting :):)
FamineToFamous 2 months ago
@MultiCube69 if he's gay why would he fuck a girl? Try not to contradict yourself you little shit.
DeathByZerg 3 months ago
@MultiCube69 You seem mad. Go fuck yourself. Better yet, go kill yourself. lol.
TheGhostfacekilla86 3 months ago
I dont wonna be a .... litlle squirrel.Guy dont you know that animals knows what``s death and have mind as us?See the last scientific study,Please let them in peace.Funnyest is to love them.Shoot something else.this tells you one stupid that did this before and stoped not becouse scient but becouse death``s view
chp656 4 months ago
fk off, lost time for stupids.
Pelagambas1 4 months ago
that really is a sad video.
mateuszsymbula 4 months ago
Lol some people are just so obsessed over how 'good' new tech is, that they fail to realize that old-school stuff is just so much more fun. I mean, who wants a stupid rifle that takes the skill out of hunting? Killing with a bow is much more of an accomplishment.
DigiBentoBox 6 months ago
@DigiBentoBox yeah the only time i use tech to hunt is when im hunting coyote and it would be impossible otherwise
redneck38spl 5 months ago
@DigiBentoBox
A rifle does not take the skill out of hunting by any means, it requires it's own set of skills to use. It's also a much more merciful and quick death for the animal. What kind of hunter are you to make an animal suffer and thrash about so much when it doesn't need to, so you can feel like you accomplished something?
Kavik1200 4 months ago
@DigiBentoBox Bud, I hunt with a longbow, but I assure you, a rifle is not something that can be used without skill...
RangerSynthios 2 months ago
Sorry but your video lies, how is a bow the most acient of weapons? ever heard of the stick(staff) or how about a spear?
CannabisDelux 6 months ago
Why use this when their are better tools at your disposal. This is like using a type writer over a super computer
raddpuppy70 6 months ago
@raddpuppy70 for the hell of it... lol
Sporora 6 months ago
dude you suck at that sh#t...either buy a compound bow or retire...
tory445828196 6 months ago
How many arrows do you lose?
jacobclaus 7 months ago 6
@jacobclaus Not that many.... maybe 3 or 4 in one season...
primitivepathways 7 months ago 9
@primitivepathways Accept this challenge on your quest and the reward are: 5000 gold and 10k experience.
Get a 3 squirrels in 1 arrow.
MeSezSo 3 months ago
papyrus
rando76x 7 months ago
@008devlin Another sad troll with nothing better to do than to post shit on peoples videos...
HomeMadeGunNut 7 months ago
hahahahah this guy cant shoot a deer with a bow but is trying to get a squirrel with one. Are those bedroom slippers you are wearing?
waylonduscrack 7 months ago
HUNT BIGGER ANIMALS TRAP THE SMALL ONES
clarissaduh28 8 months ago
@cheapcape you probably abuse animals and rape them
huntingnfishing8 8 months ago
animal abuse
cheapcape 8 months ago
@cheapcape dod you click this video just to troll? get the fuck out!
RyanMatthewHill 8 months ago
where's the good shot?
nathoi 9 months ago
mr. primitivepathways, have you ever stuck that arrow up your ass? i thought so..
knifefight19 10 months ago
F is for FAIL
GMAN2187 10 months ago
The most primitive weapon would be a rock.
Drivinfast247 10 months ago
@Drivinfast247 a stick is
flamefinger1989 8 months ago
@Drivinfast247 no would be hand push
zederish 8 months ago
Great video where do you get your silencers or what are they made of?
28blay 11 months ago
@28blay you can get them at ur average bow store just ask for them mine are really just rubber strings tied around the string of ur bow
Kidzukie 9 months ago
Nice video,
blackfeatherarchery 1 year ago
3 people have absolutely no FUCKING clue about whats happening in the world or where it's going.
PkSage89 1 year ago
Squirrels are open to hunt from Sept. to Feb. in New York State with a small game license. Red squirrels are unprotected and legal to hunt year round as they are viewed as vermin. I shoot the little buggers every chance I get. Not only have I had multiple accounts of them nesting in destroying wires in and around my home, there is nothing more aggravating than a red squirrel "barking" at you while you are sitting in a tree stand. Good video, and can't wait to see you bag some.
malicebmx 1 year ago
Do you ever actually hit anything? I mean your videos aren't too bad but up to now all I see is a drumroll and a miss, or are you saving all the hits for your dvd?
SonOfHassan 1 year ago
haha great
greaper55 1 year ago
Just out of curiosity, why would you hunt squirrels?
Bulldog22031 1 year ago
@Bulldog22031 to eat them dumb ass
fgf051 1 year ago
@fgf051 Wow, you're a dick. I ask an honest question, and you respond like that?
I've never heard of people eating squirrels on a regular basis, so it's news to me. Try being a more pleasant human being sometime; you might come off as less of a douche.
Bulldog22031 1 year ago
@Bulldog22031 but you are a fucking idiot so it is justified
Pawnbroker00 11 months ago
@fgf051 im srry i didnt know your one of them punks who talk all that shit but when they get in a fight they get there ass whooped
fgf051 1 year ago
@fgf051 LMAO you replied to yourself
goodnight4u 1 year ago
@Bulldog22031 because they are tasty?
cowboyfromkettins 1 year ago
now rabbit thats a tasty meat
Kenjutsumasters 1 year ago
moral or emoral you can live off it but squirrel meat tastes like shit
Kenjutsumasters 1 year ago
@Kenjutsumasters Squirrel meat is excellent.
MrCarrothead86 1 year ago
@MrCarrothead86 thats a matter of opinion, I really dont like the taste but some people do Its a personal choice. I think if I was trapped in the woods and had no other choice Id eat squirrel again but Id much rather set my table with good wild rabbit meat or even porcupine for that matter I know some people may raise an eyebrow to that but porcupine is one of the best wild meats Ive ever tasted. I just never liked squirrel but maybe it was never cooked right when I tried it years ago..
Kenjutsumasters 1 year ago
ok look i LOVE ANIMALS but i also believe we need to control the population who agrees with me.
KILL3RPANA5 1 year ago 2
@KILL3RPANA5 Yes, it is called wildlife conservation and hunters are a very important part of it. You don't see the hippy fairy liberals forking over money to ensure wildlife management areas are maintained.
Nope - they give money to fraudulent organizations such as PETA that pocket the money and product emotive garbage that the intellectually bankrupt buy into.
762Fanatic 1 year ago
So I've been reading all the "SAVE TEH SQUIRREL" comments and in all honesty I think you are wrong. Squirrels reproduce faster than rabbits.
Stop trying to force your opinion down the throats of others. (Mostly) free world we live in, quit being dicks and trying to make others believe what you believe because you think you're absolutely right.
Tastylettuce12 1 year ago
who are you god? your not above nature you scoundrels
stett99 1 year ago
@stett99 humans, made in gods image, dont have to be god to act like him.
rozuell 1 year ago
gret videos there really a change from the blurry images and messed up audio on most videos and i have learned so much fron your channel cant wait for the next vid!!
klumsykid89 1 year ago
Is there a cut in rest on that bow or are you shooting off the hand?
jacksoncole79 1 year ago
Flakersquirrels why do you preach about those those tree rats on every squirrel hunting video, its really a waste of your time because nobody ever listens to you so just give it a rest, people have always hunted squirrels ever since man came to be and they always will.
Brody400 1 year ago
Dont mind flankersquirrel.
He is a complete idiot going around all over the place bad mouthing videos of people hunting squirrels. Whats really funny is his chosen name. "flanker"
Flank, commonly referred as a move used in a plan of attack.
I would love to see what he would say if predator hunting was outlawed and is yard was full of bobcats. "OMG someone needs to do something" That someone would be a hunter you Flankersquirrel. He wishes he was a squirrel so he could sit a chew on nuts.
Labyrnthdom 1 year ago
@Labyrnthdom
Complete idiot?
Yes, someone like you, who doesn’t understand even the origin of my username.
“Flanker” – Sukhoi 27 – stands for the SUPERIORITY FIGHTER.
Complete idiot?
Yes, someone like you, who are incapable of seeing the differences and the purpose on this planet between the various animal species.
Especially the barbarians like you, who don’t see the difference between the predatory, horrid bobcat and the adorable, innocent squirrel.
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
Flank is a term used for a plan of attack. In your direction of the desired user name you have chosen and reflects what you have been doing to every youTube channel you can find. No one person except God knows the purpose on this planet.
So your against bobcats? But not squirrels? Haha thats Rich with Hypocritical bullshit. Facts, Squirrels are varmints. Varmints destroy crops, homes etc. Your animal rights activist show is as fake as your fight.
Labyrnthdom 1 year ago
@Labyrnthdom
I DO know what my purpose on this planet is.
You, OBVIOUSLY, don’t know what is yours – as evidenced by your comments of low intelligence that betray not only your ignorance; they betray that you don’t know yet, who you – YOURSELF – are.
You are even wrong about, what the term “varmint” means.
This term is used by some as the synonym for the GROUND squirrels, only.
(cont.)
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Labyrnthdom
(cont.)
Even the ground squirrels have been very useful, on balance, to the environment. They have been known to move around tons of soil, thus contributing to better plant growth.
Squirrels have been FIRST on this planet before the humans. They have the right to do here WHATEVER they want to!
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels Holey shit is that what you think the definition to that word is? Fuck even your a varmint. I know who i am. I stand for all hunters rights i.e. human beings. You stand for an animal. You are definitely detached from the world and will soon hang yourself as a sign of protest against squirrel hunters. You cant stop it, you wont stop it. And you will die a slow stressful death approaching it the wrong way.
Labyrnthdom 1 year ago
nice video, this is what you call pure hunting. oh, before i go, please excuse Flankersquirrel, he means no harm, it's just that the poor deluded fool can't help but look out for squirrels. it's a little known FACT that he was gang raped as a child by a group of over sexed squirrels, and now all his inner sexual frustrations are taken out on those that would see harm come to them, I'm afraid the poor fuck wit is NUTS!, still, you are what you eat!. keep shooting!!
PLEDGEY 1 year ago
Hope this is in a primitive area away from people. Those arrows aimed high and missing a squirrel can continue their flight and kill whatever they land on.
bfenti 1 year ago
Ha, I'm more into the Ruger 10-22 but whatever floats your boat
VideoPioneersInc 1 year ago
this guy has skills !
LucariusofSparta 1 year ago
when are you going to kill something ?
And aren't you the guy that punched himself in the head when you missed the deer.
stop doing that you'll end up brain damaged .;)
well put togeather though.
woodyapex 1 year ago
great video so far , but when are we going to see you kill something .
And aren't you the same guy that punched your self in the head when you missed a deer . I'd cut that out if i was you and stop doing it or else with the amount of misses you've had so far your going to end up brain damaged .
Any how keep up the good work ;)
woodyapex 1 year ago
dude can you do a tutorial please on how to make your bow
dizzaeble 1 year ago
hmmm im in an odd position here.. I very much enjoy hunting with primitive archery (i just recently killed my first squirrel and then elk with my recurve ) but im also a supporter of gay marriage and abortion.. what does that make me lol
lilticklez 1 year ago
@lilticklez
What does it make you?
It makes you a CONSISTENT scum of the earth.
You violate the order of the nature by murdering the tiny, beautiful, adorable, intelligent, valuable-to-the-environment, squirrels; and you continue violating another order of the nature – by supporting the perverts’ marriage.
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels LMAO. Ignorant P.O.S.
lilticklez 1 year ago
Dear flankersquirrels, STFU. That is all.
wildernessjunkie 1 year ago
did u make that bow?
desiremeansneverquit 1 year ago
Why are you calling these primitive bows? They look like wooden shortbows. I don't get the primitive part.
tarvalon74 1 year ago
@tarvalon74 They are considered primitive because they are made of natural materials (wood). I only call them that because it designates that I'm not using a bow made of fiberglass, which isn't primitive (though it is considered traditional). Primitive doesn't mean they are crude or ineffective.
primitivepathways 1 year ago 2
Keep poping those fluffy tailed bastards
stripymccatpuss 1 year ago
@stripymccatpuss
It is YOU, and all the other, remaining gray-squirrel-murdering barbarians in the Great Britain, who should have been popped long ago.
All you squirrel-murdering barbarians WILL pay for your mind-boggling, mass-murder of the innocent, valuable gray-squirrels that you committed in the last two years.
YOU WILL NOT GET AWAY WITH IT!
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels Okay, look, we totally hi jacked the comments for the vid. We are never going to agree on this, but you must realise about what you say about beauty and such is your OPINION, not fact. Some people find them ugly but i like them too they are cute, but they are also a food source, i dont waste squirrel meat or bones/skin. I am grateful that it lost its life for the continued circle of life. And your in Britain? Im in the US and its common in some palces to eat squirrel........
th3boy75 1 year ago
@th3boy75
You live in such a rich country as the US, and your dilemma – as far as squirrels are concerned – is, squirrels’ life, or the man’s survival?
Such a question is called fraud.
There is no need whatsoever to murder squirrels in this country to survive.
You admit that squirrels are cute, and then suggest that squirrels are a good source of meat.
That – a proposition in a country that is oversaturated with commercial, meat-markets.
(cont.)
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
Comment removed
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels Its common in some places here to eat squirrel, not where i live but i understand what they are, an animal to watch and enjoy and food for some. You take the first option and i will take the second and first because yes i do like watching them, they play w/each other and it is nature but so it them being prey.So can we just agree to disagree and end this like gentlemen? Or if your a woman(no offence if male) like a lady? I'm tired of these conversations & im sure you are to 0_-
th3boy75 1 year ago
Keep on hunting friend!! Squirrel hunting is my favorite hands down.. Great eating as well..
1957stan 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Keep away from the adorable squirrels -- you primitive barbarians!
Two adult ''men'' murdering such tiny, valuable, beautiful animals?
It is YOU -- the two primitives, who should be shot with that primitive bow.
In the ancient times people hunted squirrels for survival because there were NO SUPERMARKETS then.
Now -- HANDS OFF THEM!
Flankersquirrels 2 years ago
@Flankersquirrels Haha...flankers, you little child...you make me laugh. I know you and your kind...you despise me because I hunt animals, but you support abortions of unborn infants and support gay marriage among other societal suicides. Your twisted intellect cannot operate with logic, because you have none.
primitivepathways 1 year ago 11
I despise you because by murdering squirrels you violate the man's honor.
I am not against ETHICAL hunting.
I definitely support abortion for the dark hordes.
When I lived in San Francisco I carried out counter-demonstrations during the Pervert Shame Parades. I spoke many times on the radio against the perverts and their agenda.
You take the life of a precious, child-like animal, of all things in a rich, industrialized country, and say it is I, who have twisted intellect?!
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
Do you eat meat? If so, enough said. If not, you have to be one sickly looking bastard just like the rest of the veg heads. All gray looking and shit.
Ddubya77 1 year ago
@Ddubya77
Yes, I do eat chicken, turkey, pig, cow meat every day.
These animals were made for eating. They have no intelligence, no beauty, no value to the environment.
Obviously, as befits the squirrel-murdering barbarian, you don’t see the difference between various animal species.
No surprise – that’s what one expects from a barbarian like you.
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels barbarian like me? hmmmm.. So you're saying that you are less of a "barbarian" because you let someone else kill your food? That's like saying John Gotti isn't a murderer because he hired someone else to wack people. What makes a squirrel more important than a cow, pig,chicken, turkey? Squirrels have been food source for man since the beginning of man, so what's your point? You contradict yourself by calling me a barbarian and then eat a turkey sandwich. Get a clue!
Ddubya77 1 year ago
@Ddubya77
Yeah didn't you get the memo? Anyone who bow hunts is a barbarian.
Tree rat hugging idiot
Labyrnthdom 1 year ago
@Labyrnthdom I just hope this guy is messing with us.. Nobody can be this detached from reality can they? What a tool !!
Ddubya77 1 year ago
@Ddubya77 Im afraid so, he is detached. Go look around YouTube for bow hunting squirrels and you will see a post by him on almost every single video. Bad mouthing and threatening any one who likes the video including the original owner. He spouts opinions on his views of why they should not be hunted and why they are important to the ecosystem. Damn right they are important! They are a great source of food. Some people think there is not enough on a squirrel for a meal. 4oz meat is all you need.
Labyrnthdom 1 year ago
@Ddubya77
You have already proven to be a retarded barbarian by not being able to distinguish such animals as pigs, cows, chickens and turkeys, from squirrels.
By having proven to be such, I have to lower my standards in my explanations, to your level:
Squirrels are totally unique animals. No other animal has the child-nature of a squirrel.
(cont.)
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Ddubya77
(cont.)
While being extremely valuable to the ecosystem, at the same time they are usually totally incapable of fighting any other animal species.
Squirrels have been the source of an ENORMOUS value as the man’s companion/friend/object- of-interest or watching.
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels The squirrel has been much more "valuable" as a food source. I haven't seen to many people with pet squirrels? I think they're fun to watch too, especially when they curl up in a ball and fall 30 feet to the ground. That to me is great entertainment, so yes I see your point.
Ddubya77 1 year ago
@Ddubya77
Just another squirrel-murdering, scum of the earth!
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels I'm eating a squirrel sandwich right now : )
Ddubya77 1 year ago
What's wrong with supporing gay marriage! >:(
SniperViper1000 1 year ago
Are you kidding us? Gays can't have any marriage, it is connection of man and woman.
DictatorRoB 1 year ago
That's why it's called GAY Marriage. -.-'
SniperViper1000 1 year ago
@SniperViper1000
There can't be any shit like that, only marriage-only this and nothing more.
Faggots can pump their asses if they like, but no marriages, NEVER!
Bow on faggots!
DictatorRoB 1 year ago
@primitivepathways
As far as I am concerned, hunting is just fine as long as hunters follow one simple rule. Eat what you kill. If you aren't planning to eat it, don't shoot it.
Anyone who objects to that sort of hunting on moral grounds must consume no meat, leather, or products derived from animals (which includes many cosmetics, medicines, household cleaners) or recognize their own hypocrisy.
Squirrel pie anyone?
Llyranon 1 year ago
@Llyranon
You obviously are one of those, who are incapable of seeing the difference between various animal species, as far as their purpose on this earth, is.
You have neither the intellect, nor the morality, nor the common sense.
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
My position is a moderate one: that the only moral justification for hunting was an intention to eat the animals one hunts. People who object to that sort of hunting, if they wish to be eithically consistent, must also refrain from consuming farmed meat and animal products.
Who decides the "purpose" of the animal in fashion that makes hunting for food immoral but slaughtering farm animals for food permissable? What criteria do you use to distinguish one animal from another?
Llyranon 1 year ago
@Llyranon
The criteria to distinguish between various animals, as far as their purpose of this earth is, are:
1. Their usefulness to the ecology (environment)
2. Their intelligence and physical attractiveness
3. Their enriching the lives of the human beings on the emotional level
Your idea of hunting ethics is flawed because it is based on the false assumption that all animals are equal.
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
Take deer and cattle for instance. They are both cloven hooved, herbivorous ruminants of roughly the same intelligence. Do you decide that cattle can be eaten but deer mustn't because deer are prettier? Because they're more likely to have Disney movies made about them?
If Eugenists ever take over I hope you have an exceptionally pretty face because, let's face it, you've shown that your reasoning ability is sub-par. Unless you're sufficiently good looking to compensate
Llyranon 1 year ago
@Llyranon
No, both cattle and deer should be eaten, because as you noticed – they both are of the same, low intelligence.
Calves – of any animals species, should be exempt from slaughter as it violates the man’s honor.
Your eugenics analogy doesn’t apply here. Eugenics is killing without a moral and ethical reason.
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
1. Eugenics is predicated on a very specific morality. It isn't one I agree with, but it's there.
2. I never stated all animals were equal. The eating of a mealworm isn't equivalent to consuming a dinner of porpoise meat. I stated that the only moral justification for hunting was the hunter's intention to eat the animal he kills. That doesn't preclude other conditions applying; laws, convention and even personal taste can also limit a hunter's perogatives.
Llyranon 1 year ago
@Llyranon
In spite of your denial you continue treating all animals as equal. When you qualified the moral justification for killing animals, you extended that justification to ALL animals.
There ARE animals, like hogs, which killing off – I agree – is justified by the hunter’s intention alone, to eat them.
In case of squirrels this intention alone doesn’t justify morally killing them.
Why?
(cont.)
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
You're an idiot. Just in case that wasn't clear yet.
I extended the justification that it is permissable to hunt any animal for food "in extremis" or in a situation of extreme need, where human life depends on the act. I don't believe that any animal's life is worth more than that of a person.
Sure squirrels plant trees. So do many herbivores, and omnivores, deer and hogs included. And many trees self-plant. Are those trees exempt from occasional harvest?
Llyranon 1 year ago
I will not be getting in the hypothetical discussions of human starvation versus killing of squirrels just for the purpose of survival. Such discussions belong in Somalia, not in the rich countries such as the U.S.
You claim that deer and hogs plant trees?
No wonder you didn’t explain how they are – allegedly – doing it.
Complete crap!
You are using the politically correct, fraudulent, insulting jargon of “harvest”, as applied to killing of squirrels, and you call ME an idiot?!
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
Yes, deer and hogs plant trees, through the efficient mechanism of their digestive tracts.
In other words, YES! By Complete Crap! Deer and pigs are indiscriminate eaters of vegetable matter. They consume leaves, grass, bark, and seeds of a whole host of plants and trees, and the seeds they consume are deposited, undigested, in mounds of natural fertilizer.
A naturalist such as yourself was unaware of this? Shocking.
Llyranon 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
I discussed the "in extremis" justification because you stated: "In spite of your denial you continue treating all animals as equal. When you qualified the moral justification for killing animals, you extended that justification to ALL animals."
You clearly didn't understand what "in extremis" meant, so I explained it for you. It was the only way in which I claimed all animals were equal: their lives are worth less than the lives of people.
Llyranon 1 year ago
@Llyranon
(cont.)
Because it is IMMORAL to kill animals that on balance have been extremely valuable to the environment. Squirrels, for instance, are responsible for planting more trees on this planet than humans are.
Their – more anecdotal than real – destructiveness to the habitats is just piddling compared to their constructiveness. It is extremely rare that squirrels would kill chicks; it happens only when they are faced with starvation.
(cont.)
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
The aggressiveness of squirrels to young of competing species and competing families within the same species is well documented. We have several dozen squirrel nests on our three acre property, and I've watched nest raiding and the killing of infant squirrels on many occasions, and there's always been plenty of food available. I've even saved a couple.
To hold squirrels forth as a uniquely precious, noble species is ridiculous. Vultures are equally important ecologically.
Llyranon 1 year ago
@Llyranon
I do not believe for a second that adult squirrels killed baby squirrels of competing squirrel families ANYWHERE. Such killings certainly happen – but by raccoons, hawks, cats and other worthless bandits, like that.
Vultures are equally important ecologically to squirrels?
You mean because they get rid the earth of the carrion?
And that’s supposed to be equal to planting trees by squirrels?
Who is an idiot here?!
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
I've watched adult squirrels kill baby squirrels of competing families, so your belief is simply wrong.
And if you think disposing of carrion is not an environmentally significant function then you truly are an idiot. Because of that function, which is handled by a scant few species of animals, Vultures are protected by law in most Western nations. Squirrels neither need nor merit such protection, or at least such is the opinion of the Ministry of Environment in Canada.
Llyranon 1 year ago
@Llyranon
(cont.)
It is also immoral to kill squirrels because they constitute a great visual attraction to, or enrich lives as companions of, the VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE.
In order to know the value of squirrels you have to actually befriend them, be in their company a lot. If your knowledge about them is based on seeing them from a distance, and reading about them, then you don’t know what you are talking about.
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
Personally I rather like squirrels, but I know many folks who despise them as vermin. Birdwatchers in particular seem to have a natural antipathy for them, as they bully songbirds away from feeders. Where do you get your "vast majority"? Even if it exists, since when did public opinion consitute evidence of value? Once the majority of the inhabitants of the earth believed the planet to be flat.
Llyranon 1 year ago
@Llyranon
Where do I get my vast majority from?
From talking to them. I have talked, over the years to hundreds of RANDOM people, who just happened to witness me feed squirrels.
Why the majority of people, who value squirrels, constitute the evidence of the value of squirrels?
Because they simply value squirrels!
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
Look up the logical fallacy of argumentum ad populum sometime.
And at the same time, why do the random people you've talked to count for more than the random people I've talked to who dislike squirrels? You, in your specific environment, encountering people WHILE feeding squirrels, are hardly a suitable mechanism for random polling. You provide anecdotal evidence of people liking squirrels, I provide anecdotal evidence to the contrary. Neither is conclusive.
Llyranon 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
In addition, the squirrel population is vast and capable of rapid growth. You really think a couple of marginally capable human hunters represents a threat to them? Any single species of hawk or owl kills an exponentially greater number every year. Hell, so do cars.
Should human hunters kill squirrels? Not without a better reason than boredom, I agree. Do they represent a true threat to squirrels? Nope.
And finally, are you a nutjob? Abso-fricking-lutely.
Llyranon 1 year ago
@Llyranon
According to the official statistics, the squirrels-murdering, barbaric hunters kill MILLIONS of squirrels in the U.S.
The squirrel populations in such cities as Seattle gets lower EVERY year, though in this case not due to hunters. Same with the Western Gray squirrels population in Washington; same with the Red squirrel population in such countries as Great Britain (due to deforestation and pollution).
(cont.)
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
Show me one statistic on squirrel hunting. Squirrels are killed in urban areas, by vehicles largely. The declining squirrel population in Washington state has nothing to do with hunting. The declining pop in GB is in Red Squirrels, and is attributed to fragmentation of habitat, squirrel pox, and being outcompeted by Gray squirrels.
Now google "Squirrel overpopulation" and see the hits you'll get for South Carolina, Ontario, California, Connecticut...
Llyranon 1 year ago
@Llyranon
cont.)
You no match to me when it comes to the hands-on experience with squirrels. In the last six-plus years, I spent on the average four hours A DAY with them.
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
Pardon me: I did find one study on the effect of hunting on squirrel populations, conducted in Ohio in 1965. The study found that "...an average harvest of 37.4% of the estimated fall population of gray squirrels produced no significant difference in the average annual mortality rate compared with the rate on an adjascent unhunted area" (Journal of Wildlife Management, 1975, Vol 39)
Llyranon 1 year ago
@Llyranon
I just scanned your latest comments.
You have wondered deeply into a one-way street; in other words – into inanity.
When it comes to approaching the subject of squirrels, one is supposed to depend on one’s very fundamental, human instincts – starting with the common sense. Your heavy rationalizing the killing of squirrels just proved that those instincts of yours are abrogated.
p.s.
I don’t believe for a second that you witnessed adult squirrels kill baby squirrels.
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
How amusing. You made a number of factual statements that I've demonstrated to be incorrect. Squirrel populations aren't threatened worldwide -- there are isolated regions where populations decline, but globally there is no reason to see the squirrel as a threatened species, and in no area where there's a declining population is that decline tied to hunting. In fact, the only stat available on the topic indicates that hunting has no lasting effect on the species
Llyranon 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels Adult squirrels will kill their young, so will birds you fucking idiot. Your quest is a endless one when you have no information backing up all the stupid shit you say. You have a real sickness about you indulging your life so deeply into tree rat.
Anyway, everyone i have a nice little video dedicated to FlankerShit.
Labyrnthdom 1 year ago
@Llyranon
In other words – one cannot argue with a barbarian.
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels haha guess you ran out of arguments
777EZekiel 1 year ago
Your "ethical" rationale for protecting squirrels is deeply inconsistent and without rational basis.
And having had that established, you resort to argumentum ad hominem -- last refuge of the foolish debater.
Of course, if I've proven you wrong, I MUST be a barbarian whose opinion can be conveniently discounted. You can't deal with the argument itself, so you try to discredit the person making it.
Sorry if I spoiled your argument by bringing facts and reason into play.
Llyranon 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
Without question, I cannot match your 4 hours per day spent with squirrels over the last six years. During the years in question, I've had..what's the word I'm looking for... oh yes. A life.
Ironically, I originally posted on this forum because I thought the hunt it showed was cruel and pointless. The hunter wasn't planning to eat his kill; he was killing for the sport of it.
After talking to you for a bit, however, I find myself feeling hungry for squirrel.
Llyranon 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
it's very moral to kill a squirrel. there are too many of them. do you badmouth hawks and fox and wolves that eat them?
Thetruthishere11 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
There can be other limits, but without the initial justification of intending to eat what you kill, those other limits don't even need to be discussed. And, in extremis, since a human's life is worth more than that of any animal, a starving person would have the right to kill ANY animal they intended to eat.
3. So, if you have no problem with hunting deer, are you actually simply a fanatic for the preservation of squirrels? 'Cause, mate, that's more than a little weird.
Llyranon 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
To a lot of people, biologists included, squirrels are just rats with good PR. They're omnivorous, viciously competitive amongst themselves in securing territory, to the point of killing they young of other families in their own species, let alone other species, at any given opportunity. They'll similarly raid the nests of songbirds. A Disney movie, squirrels ain't.
And THAT's the one species that you're moved to defend with vitriolic diatribes on Youtube?
Wow. Nutty.
Llyranon 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
you'll be first up against the wall.
Llyranon 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels fuck you
pimpboy58 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels you do not shoot anything you are not going to eat
reaper795atyutub 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
them little bleeders have killed all our reds ! kill em all
woodyapex 1 year ago
@woodyapex
Another British, gray squirrel-murdering barbarian spreading malicious lies about those squirrels.
It is your British PEOPLE, who murdered the red squirrels through deforestation and pollution of their habitats; and through the outright mass-killings of them throughout the centuries, treating them as pests.
Now, barbarians like you suddenly started to awaken their sense of nativism in a cowardly, twisted, pathological, sick, barbaric way:
(cont.)
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@woodyapex
(cont.)
Instead of focusing on niggers and other dark hordes that invaded your country, barbarians like you focused their murderous instincts, on the adorable, innocent, valuable gray squirrels.
You British barbarians WILL pay for the holocaust of the gray squirrels that you committed under the fraudulent pretext of saving the red squirrels.
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
Innocent of what? Chewing holes in your house?
Valuable, well i would have to agree with you there pal. Man they are good fried or in dumplings.
Labyrnthdom 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels I live in Scotland, grey squirrels are not valuable, they are eliminating our native red squirrels and as such many country dwelling scots make it our obligation to hunt or trap as many of the little bastards as possible.
cowboyfromkettins 1 year ago
@cowboyfromkettins
Another Scottish barbarian, spreading lies about the gray squirrel situation in Scotland.
The gray, and the red – squirrels, in the Great Britain, have always lived in harmony. The squirrel para-pox infection that killed a couple of dozens of the red squirrels in Scotland is neither a threat to the survival of the reds as the subspecies,
(cont.)
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@cowboyfromkettins
(cont.)
nor a JUSTIFICATION WHATSOEVER for having carried-out the mass-murder of the grays, that the Scottish barbarians have committed.
Read (on the internet) FACTS – as opposed to demagoguery – about that situation, from one of the few, remaining Scottish, honorable men – Professor Acorn.
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels fucking hell are you being serious ! squirrels are a pest they are tree rats, its sad fuckers like you that need to be shot with it .
lurcher08 1 year ago
@lurcher08
Listen, squirrel-murdering, barbaric bandit:
It is YOU, who in reality is a pest; together with your filthy, repulsive beasts of a dog.
If I catch you, bandit, murdering the adorable squirrels, it will be YOU, who will be enjoyed for dinner by your ugly dogs!
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels
If, that is, the Eugenists use your method of differentiating between animals to protect and animals to kill off.
Llyranon 1 year ago
@Flankersquirrels my ugly dogs like a bit of squirrel aswell. You really do need to get a life . Wanker .
lurcher08 1 year ago
@lurcher08
Your barbaric head should be smashed to pieces together with those, of your ugly, repulsive, beasts of a dog.
Flankersquirrels 1 year ago