I would not encourage anyone to have an abortion. There are many reasons for this. Yet if a woman is told by her doctor that she needs to let go of a pregnancy for health reasons, she doesn't need any judgement or guilt attached to this very difficult situation. Most people are not selfish people, and would not choose this if they didn't have too. Be careful you do not cause unintended harm with your words. You may also be endangering the innocent. Especially those who feel as strongly you do.
what is the chance of and ectopic baby to live? i have always worried abut having an ectopic pregnancy, i could never have a baby taken out of me unless he/she has already passed away.
i love my baby to death. im almost 11 weeks and if they told me i had an ectopic pregnancy i would die for my baby never never an abortion if god dose not want it to be he will take the baby his self everything happens for a reason life is never justified
@richardfanx3 i was 16 when i raised my nephew my sister literally did nothing to take care of her son, I was 16 working part time at winn dixie, was goin to school full time and would wake up in the middle of the night for my nephew, i made his bottles, i fed him, i bathed him, i put him to sleep, i changed his dipers, i took care of him it wasn't easy but i did it, the only thing my sister did was carry him for 9mnths and give birth to him, trust me it comes natural to a woman.
i believe this country is headed for major pain and awakenings in the coming years!! we as a nation are evil and this is visible by the majority of the comments listed below! my children ALWAYS come first...and if we had a gunman at our door i would always die for any of my children in the blink of an eye they are MY WORLD!! thank you for showing that there are documented cases where the pregnancy has made it when it is tubal and ectopic!
We are in this bad economy ( famine ) because we proactively sacrifice our kids in the womb, Deut 18:10. Perhaps next to not believing in God this is probably the biggest abomination we have in our country, and we are paying for it now. Is the economy going to change for the better? Not untill we change our ways in this tolerant country with man as our king. -Bill
unfortunately sometimes the methotrexate doesnt work and you still need surgery though the majority of women can avoid this by getting the medicine early which keeps them from having to go under the knife. the earlier the med is taken the less likely the pg will continue till tube rupture though it's not 100% - close though! YES of course you can still get pg after you heal. As long as you have 1 working tube you can still conceive naturally. Good luck!!
Studies correlate abortion to elevated breast cancer risk. Dr. L Brinton, a lead researcher from the National Cancer Institute, accidentally admitted to this abortion-breast-cancer link. To read about the proof & accidental admission, type these two news article titles into your search engine:
"National Cancer Institute Admits Abortion Raises Breast Cancer Risk But Why Aren't Women Being Told?"
"A Quiet Admission Speaks Loudly About Abortion and Breast Cancer"
I was born due to my mother not knowing she was still carrying a baby. She had just given birth to a dead baby. She even went back to work and, as she thought, was still having periods. She went bact to hospital and was told that she was still with child (me). I was adominal, so she had to have Caesarean, as I could not be born any other way! This happened in 1964, I am living proof! My mom is 83 now.
Part of the problem with your defense is the meaning behind "spontaneous resolution" of the ectopic pregnancy. This doesnt mean the pregnancy slipped into the uterus. It means the pregnancy died early enough that it doesnt require surgical intervention. Either way not viable. The example given w/ the heterotopic pg isnt a case of why ectopic intervention is bad, it's an example of why it's SO IMPORTANT to look at the uterus AND ovaries AND check the hcg levels to take the appropriate action.
goldfishnut, the video never states nor implies that spontaneous resolution means that the pregnancy "slipped into the uterus". The video means that the unborn child is allowed to die a natural death, as opposed to the physician intentionally and deliberately killing the child. If this natural death does not occur, and the growth of the tubal pregnancy threatens the life of the mother, then, the physician -- who has done everything he could - must then perform the necessary procedure.
This happened to me.... I was having twins, I had one in the uterus and one in the tube. Mine happened the other way around bcus, Im not exactly sure what happened to be honest but I was bleeding heavily and in so much pain, the doctor did a scan and said that in my uterus I had an empty sack, he said that I had miscarried the baby.
I had to be put asleep while he did a scrape to remove the sac. Weeks later, Im still bleeding heavily and in pain, I go back to the doctor only to find out that he had missed the eptopic pregnancy and i had a baby in the tube. By this time my tube was severely damaged, I had to have it removed. I was devastated. How did he miss that?? Was I having twins or is it common in eptopic pregnancys for the sac to be in the uterus, Im so confused.
goldfishnut, no, with modern medicine, it is not life threatening to monitor an ectopic pregnancy for a reasonable period of time. Your numbers are not correct.
It is very rare and the exception, not the rule, when an abdominal pregnancy goes to term. If you follow the cases that have gone to term (or close to it), the mothers don't always make it because of hemorrhage from the placenta. Ectopic pregnancies spontaneously resolving are the very rare exception and not the rule. I have personally seen MANY that were beyond the beginning stages, none of which spontaneously resolved. With the human body, anything is possible but that doesn't mean it's likely
goldfishnut, the key here is intention. Once the physician has given spontaneous resolution a reasonable chance, then, as the video explains, the necessary procedure has to be performed -- but only after the physician has done everything he could to not deliberately kill the baby without endangering the life of the mother. The physician, in this case, never deliberately wills the death of the baby, and has done everything he could to not kill the baby without endangering the life of the mother.
DORAMARIE, no, you are incorrect. The video (if you watched it) gives a case history of where a "uterine twin" was killed in doing so. Also, spontaneous resolution -- as discussed in the video -- is quite common. Remember, you are dealing here with a human being -- not a thing.
starrynightxskies, the unborn baby in its fetal state is always a human being and a person. Your attempt to dehumanize and objectify the unborn baby as rationaization for murder is obvious.
I never said it wasn't murder. I do think it's murder but it's the killing of a fetus not of an acutal human being that can speak for it's own self and can defend it's self. A fetus cannot fully function( breathe) without the mother and acutal human being can. There is a difference in "killing" a fetus and killing an acutal human being.
starrynightxskies, no, you are incorrect. I am amazed how often so-called pro-choicers obviously attempt to objectify the unborn baby. The unborn baby does have a fetal state, this is true, but the unborn baby never stops being a human being. For you to say to the contrary, is deliberate ignorance. When is the last time you heard a pregnant woman, say, "I feel my fetus kicking me?"
supervanillabears, if a "fetus", as you claim, is not legally alive, then why do abortionists seek to kill her/him? You argument makes no sense. An unborn baby is a child of the mother and father. Just ask a pregnant woman if the baby inside her is her child.
starrynightxskies, have you ever heard an expecting mother say, "Hey, I feel my fetus kicking!. No, you have not. The expecting mother says, "Hey, I feel my BABY kicking!". The mother knows what she is talking about.
richardfanx3, adoption is a moral option to murdering your own child. Live and let live. You do not know the future of any child. The future is not yours to see. Murdering an innocent child is never justified.
richardfanx3, abortion is used as birth-control all the time. If birth control pills and abortifacients fail -- then abortion is used to achieve what the selfish person(s) wants. You admit that you would get an abortion -- abortion is the murder of your own child. If you do not want to get pregnant, then do not engage in sexual relations with men. There are thousands of parents waiting in line to adopt a child.
richardfanx3, as the video points out, having a doctor monitor the situation is recommended. As the video explains, spontaneous regression is common and eliminates the need for surgery. If spontaneous regression does not occur, then surgery can be performed with the knowledge that everything was done to NOT intentionally and deliberately take the life of the baby. Pro-choicers love to distort this argument in order to justify their use of abortion as birth control.
Comment removed
lAMNOTGOOMBA 2 weeks ago
As I watch this I look at my baby girl next to me sleeping...and I thank god for such a wonderful gift words can not describe.
seromero921 2 months ago
@TrialBlazer2k9 thanks that's nice to hear, it sucks with medical technology these days I wish they could just move it into the uterus.
hotbarriedad03 2 months ago
I would not encourage anyone to have an abortion. There are many reasons for this. Yet if a woman is told by her doctor that she needs to let go of a pregnancy for health reasons, she doesn't need any judgement or guilt attached to this very difficult situation. Most people are not selfish people, and would not choose this if they didn't have too. Be careful you do not cause unintended harm with your words. You may also be endangering the innocent. Especially those who feel as strongly you do.
adriftingspiral2 6 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
You shall not lie
You shall not murder
You shall not commit adultery
You shall not steal
it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the JUDGEMENT:
whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the LAKE OF FIRE.
Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me
that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord SHAL BE SAVED
ARE YOU SAVED?
valu777 8 months ago
what is the chance of and ectopic baby to live? i have always worried abut having an ectopic pregnancy, i could never have a baby taken out of me unless he/she has already passed away.
smoozie12365 1 year ago
i love my baby to death. im almost 11 weeks and if they told me i had an ectopic pregnancy i would die for my baby never never an abortion if god dose not want it to be he will take the baby his self everything happens for a reason life is never justified
thyslove 1 year ago
@richardfanx3 when u have kids u will understand a mother would do anything for her child, even if the child doesn't live.
tiffnchris8884 1 year ago
@richardfanx3 i was 16 when i raised my nephew my sister literally did nothing to take care of her son, I was 16 working part time at winn dixie, was goin to school full time and would wake up in the middle of the night for my nephew, i made his bottles, i fed him, i bathed him, i put him to sleep, i changed his dipers, i took care of him it wasn't easy but i did it, the only thing my sister did was carry him for 9mnths and give birth to him, trust me it comes natural to a woman.
tiffnchris8884 1 year ago
That's why you should always have an ultra-sound and check.
LovedbcHim 1 year ago
i believe this country is headed for major pain and awakenings in the coming years!! we as a nation are evil and this is visible by the majority of the comments listed below! my children ALWAYS come first...and if we had a gunman at our door i would always die for any of my children in the blink of an eye they are MY WORLD!! thank you for showing that there are documented cases where the pregnancy has made it when it is tubal and ectopic!
ariana7771 2 years ago
ariana7771, you are welcome and thank you for watching! regards...
rosaryfilms 2 years ago
We are in this bad economy ( famine ) because we proactively sacrifice our kids in the womb, Deut 18:10. Perhaps next to not believing in God this is probably the biggest abomination we have in our country, and we are paying for it now. Is the economy going to change for the better? Not untill we change our ways in this tolerant country with man as our king. -Bill
aa2cl 1 year ago
unfortunately sometimes the methotrexate doesnt work and you still need surgery though the majority of women can avoid this by getting the medicine early which keeps them from having to go under the knife. the earlier the med is taken the less likely the pg will continue till tube rupture though it's not 100% - close though! YES of course you can still get pg after you heal. As long as you have 1 working tube you can still conceive naturally. Good luck!!
goldfishnut 2 years ago 5
@sablessaint , can u still have babys after the tube removal?
shellbell0112 2 years ago
@shellbell~~~they say that I can.. But I think it'll be a while...I've got to heal (mentally and physically)...I wouldn't wish this pain on ANYONE
sablessaint 2 years ago 2
abortion is murder
valu777 2 years ago
i rather die then take pills to (kill) it... and remove it...
15shakez 2 years ago
thanks for posting this awesome video.
RedboneLadyT 2 years ago
RedboneLadyT, thank you very much!
rosaryfilms 2 years ago
@RedboneLadyT
Studies correlate abortion to elevated breast cancer risk. Dr. L Brinton, a lead researcher from the National Cancer Institute, accidentally admitted to this abortion-breast-cancer link. To read about the proof & accidental admission, type these two news article titles into your search engine:
"National Cancer Institute Admits Abortion Raises Breast Cancer Risk But Why Aren't Women Being Told?"
"A Quiet Admission Speaks Loudly About Abortion and Breast Cancer"
(Andrusko)
ProLifeHelp 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You shall not lie
You shall not murder
You shall not commit adultery
You shall not steal
it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the JUDGEMENT:
whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the LAKE OF FIRE.
Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me
that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord SHAL BE SAVED
ARE YOU SAVED?
valu777 2 years ago
I was born due to my mother not knowing she was still carrying a baby. She had just given birth to a dead baby. She even went back to work and, as she thought, was still having periods. She went bact to hospital and was told that she was still with child (me). I was adominal, so she had to have Caesarean, as I could not be born any other way! This happened in 1964, I am living proof! My mom is 83 now.
djdeeinfrance 3 years ago
djdeeinfrance, thank you very much for your excellent comments -- they will help others! regards...
rosaryfilms 3 years ago
APPOINTMENTS of Mr. OMOBA-ABORTION, 2008:
5th November: Rahm Emanuel (he has voted always against life)
19th November: Tom Daschle (he has voted always pro-abortion)
20th November: Down Johnsen (ex-director of NARAL, pro-abortionist organization)
24th November: Ellen Moran (ex-director of Emilys List, pro-abortionist organization)
30th November: Hillary Clinton (member of pro-abortion international)
10th December: Jeanne Lambrew (member of Planned Parenthood, pro-abortionist organization)
maryshybossy 3 years ago
APPOINTMENTS of Mr. OMOBA-ABORTION, 2009:
5th January: Tim Kaine (pro-abortionist from Virginia)
6th January: Thomas Perrelli (lawyer of Terri Schiavo)
22nd January: personal agreement to Roe vs Wade (killed 50 million babies since 1973)
23rd January: 457 million dollars to pro-abortions organizations
26th January: James B. Steinberg (there is no limit for paying abortions)
maryshybossy 3 years ago
obama = baby killer
seventhdecember 3 years ago
wat u mean hes a baby killer?????
15shakez 2 years ago
goldfishnut, in the Principle of Double Effect, the death of the unborn is an unintended effect.
rosaryfilms 3 years ago
goldfishnut, the difference? The Principle of Double Effect.
rosaryfilms 3 years ago
Part of the problem with your defense is the meaning behind "spontaneous resolution" of the ectopic pregnancy. This doesnt mean the pregnancy slipped into the uterus. It means the pregnancy died early enough that it doesnt require surgical intervention. Either way not viable. The example given w/ the heterotopic pg isnt a case of why ectopic intervention is bad, it's an example of why it's SO IMPORTANT to look at the uterus AND ovaries AND check the hcg levels to take the appropriate action.
goldfishnut 3 years ago 4
goldfishnut, the video never states nor implies that spontaneous resolution means that the pregnancy "slipped into the uterus". The video means that the unborn child is allowed to die a natural death, as opposed to the physician intentionally and deliberately killing the child. If this natural death does not occur, and the growth of the tubal pregnancy threatens the life of the mother, then, the physician -- who has done everything he could - must then perform the necessary procedure.
rosaryfilms 3 years ago
This happened to me.... I was having twins, I had one in the uterus and one in the tube. Mine happened the other way around bcus, Im not exactly sure what happened to be honest but I was bleeding heavily and in so much pain, the doctor did a scan and said that in my uterus I had an empty sack, he said that I had miscarried the baby.
YackerUK 3 years ago
I had to be put asleep while he did a scrape to remove the sac. Weeks later, Im still bleeding heavily and in pain, I go back to the doctor only to find out that he had missed the eptopic pregnancy and i had a baby in the tube. By this time my tube was severely damaged, I had to have it removed. I was devastated. How did he miss that?? Was I having twins or is it common in eptopic pregnancys for the sac to be in the uterus, Im so confused.
YackerUK 3 years ago
I know that I have a negligent case but I have been through so much that I dont have the energy
YackerUK 3 years ago
goldfishnut, no, with modern medicine, it is not life threatening to monitor an ectopic pregnancy for a reasonable period of time. Your numbers are not correct.
rosaryfilms 3 years ago
It is very rare and the exception, not the rule, when an abdominal pregnancy goes to term. If you follow the cases that have gone to term (or close to it), the mothers don't always make it because of hemorrhage from the placenta. Ectopic pregnancies spontaneously resolving are the very rare exception and not the rule. I have personally seen MANY that were beyond the beginning stages, none of which spontaneously resolved. With the human body, anything is possible but that doesn't mean it's likely
goldfishnut 3 years ago 6
goldfishnut, the key here is intention. Once the physician has given spontaneous resolution a reasonable chance, then, as the video explains, the necessary procedure has to be performed -- but only after the physician has done everything he could to not deliberately kill the baby without endangering the life of the mother. The physician, in this case, never deliberately wills the death of the baby, and has done everything he could to not kill the baby without endangering the life of the mother.
rosaryfilms 3 years ago
DORAMARIE, no, you are incorrect. The video (if you watched it) gives a case history of where a "uterine twin" was killed in doing so. Also, spontaneous resolution -- as discussed in the video -- is quite common. Remember, you are dealing here with a human being -- not a thing.
rosaryfilms 3 years ago
starrynightxskies, the unborn baby in its fetal state is always a human being and a person. Your attempt to dehumanize and objectify the unborn baby as rationaization for murder is obvious.
rosaryfilms 3 years ago
I never said it wasn't murder. I do think it's murder but it's the killing of a fetus not of an acutal human being that can speak for it's own self and can defend it's self. A fetus cannot fully function( breathe) without the mother and acutal human being can. There is a difference in "killing" a fetus and killing an acutal human being.
starrynightxskies 3 years ago
starrynightxskies, no, you are incorrect. I am amazed how often so-called pro-choicers obviously attempt to objectify the unborn baby. The unborn baby does have a fetal state, this is true, but the unborn baby never stops being a human being. For you to say to the contrary, is deliberate ignorance. When is the last time you heard a pregnant woman, say, "I feel my fetus kicking me?"
rosaryfilms 3 years ago
supervanillabears, if a "fetus", as you claim, is not legally alive, then why do abortionists seek to kill her/him? You argument makes no sense. An unborn baby is a child of the mother and father. Just ask a pregnant woman if the baby inside her is her child.
rosaryfilms 3 years ago
starrynightxskies, have you ever heard an expecting mother say, "Hey, I feel my fetus kicking!. No, you have not. The expecting mother says, "Hey, I feel my BABY kicking!". The mother knows what she is talking about.
rosaryfilms 3 years ago
richardfanx3, adoption is a moral option to murdering your own child. Live and let live. You do not know the future of any child. The future is not yours to see. Murdering an innocent child is never justified.
rosaryfilms 3 years ago
richardfanx3, abortion is used as birth-control all the time. If birth control pills and abortifacients fail -- then abortion is used to achieve what the selfish person(s) wants. You admit that you would get an abortion -- abortion is the murder of your own child. If you do not want to get pregnant, then do not engage in sexual relations with men. There are thousands of parents waiting in line to adopt a child.
rosaryfilms 3 years ago
richardfanx3, as the video points out, having a doctor monitor the situation is recommended. As the video explains, spontaneous regression is common and eliminates the need for surgery. If spontaneous regression does not occur, then surgery can be performed with the knowledge that everything was done to NOT intentionally and deliberately take the life of the baby. Pro-choicers love to distort this argument in order to justify their use of abortion as birth control.
rosaryfilms 3 years ago