Ignore what Nassim Haramein says, he's a blatant charlatan. Comets have a small solid nucleus, but the surrounding halo of gas makes them appear large by reflected sunlight.
Small mass = small gravity !!!!
Nassim's claim that the comet had a "huge gravitational pull" is just plain stupid.
ATTN!! the images of the so called 'comets' being pulled into the sun are cgi altered.
go to --> [Nassim Haramein 31/45] Youtube video, around 8:40.
Nassim says that the 'tails' shown on the 'so called' comets were 'Added' later by people by an organization that initially removed the 'no tail' objects from being displayed. Then put them back, and they had added tails, to convince people they were comets.
*I highly recommend everyone to watch all of Nassim Haramein 45/45. It is fascinating.
SW desert outside Las Vegas NV camping one evening in 1998 to comets streaked across the sky SE to NW directly over my location on the same path fractions of a second apart. Could they have been the same ones as seen in this video?
So THEY ARE ENORMOUS , their orbits DO NOT match , just check the distance between those planets and use your head to calculate if its possible to have these orbits so close in ONLY FEW DAYS!!!!
I dont know what these are, I cant tell they are UFOs but I know one thing .THEY ARE NOT planets or comets. Do a serious research before eating the NASA shit.
Second the size of these OBJECTS is relevant with the size of the sun because they move behind the sun and NOT in the middle of the distance between Sun-Earth.
I dont know about spelling but I DO know about astronomy because I have attended many courses.Some of you should open an astronomy book first before posting here.The orbits of the planets DO NOT MATCH IN THE TIME FRAME THE SOHO PRESENTS .Just open any goddamn astronomy book and check if these planets move in the time frame of 72- 96 hours the timer shows.
I believe the circle represents the size of the sun. I think the larger black disk we see is a type of filter on the optics to allow it to see the surrounding events.
Google Nassim Haramein for his 8 hour lecture which includes his explaination of this.
He starts talking about aliens and crop circles alot, but his interpretation of a unified theory of physics is very enjoyable.
He is expanding on the theories of a friend of Nikola Tesla. I cannot remember his name.
What you are witnessing when observing a comet round the Sun is huge amounts of gas excited by the effects of the solar environment, you're not actually seeing the comet nucleus. I believe Comet Hale-Bopp's tail was 3 million miles long...yet the comet itself was only 25 miles in diameter. You can research comets through google.
Comets are not enormous as some people claim, although if Chiron ever became a bona-fide comet, it would be an exception to the rule. On average comets are a mile or two across. The coma and tail(s) of comets CAN be enormous; the tail of the 1843 Great Comet was equal to the distance of Mars from the Sun. These ARE comets and planets, and all planets orbits are elliptical/near circular, although Mercury is a bit more elliptical
Chiron is the biggest Centaur, about 200 miles wide. If Hale-Bopp was bright for 18 months but was at most 25 miles wide, imagine what a sky show Chiron would put on if it ever became a true comet. Its' studied orbit suggests one day it WILL be one. Chiron would look like a second, much redder Sun, easily a daylight comet to put the ones in 1811, 1843, 1858, 1863 and 1910 to shame. Chiron is made of exotic, semi-organic (?) compounds that would burn at an Earth-like distance
If the sun is in the middle, how come the planets are moving straight through and not around? Obviously the planets don't move straight through the sun,so how am I looking at this wrong???
Good question from someone who doesn't do much stargazing. The Sun is large, I mean like very HUGE. The SOHO satellite is in stationary orbit at the LaGrange Point, or about a million miles from Earth. The Sun is 93 million miles from Earth. For comparison, Saturn is 500 million miles from the Sun. When we observe planets traveling past the Sun, we are seeing a very small portion of their very large orbit, thus it appears they are traveling in a straight line. I hope this makes sense.
Also, not all of the planets are passing between the satellite's camera and the Sun. Jupiter and Saturn for example are further from the Sun than we are, so they are obviously passing *behind* the Sun from our perspective.
It must be something artificial. There is a rhythm when the beam stretch out. And there are 2 kinds of beams one is lighter and the other less. They both function in rhytmic movement and in contrast .Watch the video carefully.
this is a red herring, a futile attempt to distract people from the 1000+ mile long absolutely huge spaceships that are trying to stop the sun going nova or trying to perk it up to prevent an ice age
becaause the comet doesnt have a iron core like earth and the magnetosphere around it or atleast a symetrical one like earth does then yes it would fizzle away into plasma cause of it constantly getting bombarded with particles of wateva at light speed..
The reaction is only explainble, when the sun and the comets are considered as electrical charged bodys. So what is happening that there is a plasma reaktion on very high levels. This is also called " electrical universe"
if a comet is patially made of ice then how could it get so close to the sun without fizzling away into nothing??? I think they are under intelligent control, just my opinion
I apologize, I usually give credit to the music! It's Steve Turner's "Homage" from his album Ajna Hara: Rhythm Of The Sky. I would blow the dust out of my didgeridoo, but I can't play it that well anyway o_O
Those are planets?? I don't know much about astrology but seems to me that those shouldn't be planets.
operations1000 1 year ago
is a burner from cd's if you dont see this your blind
giohhh00000 1 year ago
Ignore what Nassim Haramein says, he's a blatant charlatan. Comets have a small solid nucleus, but the surrounding halo of gas makes them appear large by reflected sunlight.
Small mass = small gravity !!!!
Nassim's claim that the comet had a "huge gravitational pull" is just plain stupid.
indie3 2 years ago 9
fyi, Nassim said that one of the large comets that flew right past the Sun was 2X's the size of Jupiter (the largest planet in our solar system).
He said it should have pulled the planets out of alignment but did not. And he doesn't know why. He says he thinks, "Someone is protecting us."
camiller3754 2 years ago
Awesome upload! Thank you.
camiller3754 2 years ago
Nassim talks slow, but give him credit, he is a genius.
Peace all.
and
End Time.
camiller3754 2 years ago
ATTN!! the images of the so called 'comets' being pulled into the sun are cgi altered.
go to --> [Nassim Haramein 31/45] Youtube video, around 8:40.
Nassim says that the 'tails' shown on the 'so called' comets were 'Added' later by people by an organization that initially removed the 'no tail' objects from being displayed. Then put them back, and they had added tails, to convince people they were comets.
*I highly recommend everyone to watch all of Nassim Haramein 45/45. It is fascinating.
camiller3754 2 years ago
Awesome! : )
joethepro3 2 years ago
SW desert outside Las Vegas NV camping one evening in 1998 to comets streaked across the sky SE to NW directly over my location on the same path fractions of a second apart. Could they have been the same ones as seen in this video?
WillDeliver 2 years ago
No. Comets do not 'streak' across the sky...meteors do. The comets in this video were on a time lapse, they actually didn't move that quick.
DesMoinesAstronomy 2 years ago 8
So THEY ARE ENORMOUS , their orbits DO NOT match , just check the distance between those planets and use your head to calculate if its possible to have these orbits so close in ONLY FEW DAYS!!!!
I dont know what these are, I cant tell they are UFOs but I know one thing .THEY ARE NOT planets or comets. Do a serious research before eating the NASA shit.
webstarcom 2 years ago
Second the size of these OBJECTS is relevant with the size of the sun because they move behind the sun and NOT in the middle of the distance between Sun-Earth.
webstarcom 2 years ago
I dont know about spelling but I DO know about astronomy because I have attended many courses.Some of you should open an astronomy book first before posting here.The orbits of the planets DO NOT MATCH IN THE TIME FRAME THE SOHO PRESENTS .Just open any goddamn astronomy book and check if these planets move in the time frame of 72- 96 hours the timer shows.
webstarcom 2 years ago
I'll say it again although it's tiring.
NO COMET FOLLOWS RYTHMIC MOVEMENTS. 3 DIFFERENT PATTERNS ARE HERE WITH PATTERN. 2 BEAMS STRETCH OUT AND IN REVERSE
WATCH THE VID CAREFULLY AT LAST.
NASA IS FULL OF ......
webstarcom 2 years ago
Awesome vid, just wish it had shown Comet Holmes when it flared
LeinadEkkru 2 years ago
1:15 comet 96p/machholz sun timing of those sun blasts were perfect
okuma0kuma 2 years ago
what´s this brigth inner circle in the sun???
XoXabaras 2 years ago
I believe the circle represents the size of the sun. I think the larger black disk we see is a type of filter on the optics to allow it to see the surrounding events.
Google Nassim Haramein for his 8 hour lecture which includes his explaination of this.
He starts talking about aliens and crop circles alot, but his interpretation of a unified theory of physics is very enjoyable.
He is expanding on the theories of a friend of Nikola Tesla. I cannot remember his name.
Fun video at worst
WickeDFate4 2 years ago
omg undelievable explosions in the surface..
perselstar 2 years ago
hmm do you see many comets in the solar system with 3 times the size of earth??? another lie from NASA to cover some "wierd" around the sun.
discosmic 2 years ago
What you are witnessing when observing a comet round the Sun is huge amounts of gas excited by the effects of the solar environment, you're not actually seeing the comet nucleus. I believe Comet Hale-Bopp's tail was 3 million miles long...yet the comet itself was only 25 miles in diameter. You can research comets through google.
picassolama 2 years ago
Sorry that i dissapoint you that these ARE NOT COMETS OR PLANETS.
I don't know what they are but the orbits of planets don't mach AT ALL.
Comets are ENORMOUS and most important the PASS BEHIND THE SUN , so their size is real next to the sun.
COMETS WITH RYTHMIC MOVEMENT ARE NOT COMETS Watch the vid carefully, NASA IS NOT THE GOD AND A RELIGION TO EAT ON THE PLATE WHAT THEY SERVE YOU.
You must use your mind first....
webstarcom 2 years ago
Wait, what? Are you saying Halley's comet is not a comet? Because Halley's IS periodic (or "rhytmic").
Comets are not enormous, but their comas and tails are. They don't pass "behind" the Sun, there is no such thing.
theparaiba 2 years ago
First of all, learn to spell
Comets are not enormous as some people claim, although if Chiron ever became a bona-fide comet, it would be an exception to the rule. On average comets are a mile or two across. The coma and tail(s) of comets CAN be enormous; the tail of the 1843 Great Comet was equal to the distance of Mars from the Sun. These ARE comets and planets, and all planets orbits are elliptical/near circular, although Mercury is a bit more elliptical
LeinadEkkru 2 years ago 4
Thanks for enlightening me on Chiron, don't know how I've missed the Centaurs previously. Very interesting object indeed!
picassolama 2 years ago
Chiron is the biggest Centaur, about 200 miles wide. If Hale-Bopp was bright for 18 months but was at most 25 miles wide, imagine what a sky show Chiron would put on if it ever became a true comet. Its' studied orbit suggests one day it WILL be one. Chiron would look like a second, much redder Sun, easily a daylight comet to put the ones in 1811, 1843, 1858, 1863 and 1910 to shame. Chiron is made of exotic, semi-organic (?) compounds that would burn at an Earth-like distance
LeinadEkkru 2 years ago
I am confused.
If the sun is in the middle, how come the planets are moving straight through and not around? Obviously the planets don't move straight through the sun,so how am I looking at this wrong???
dunskie 3 years ago
Good question from someone who doesn't do much stargazing. The Sun is large, I mean like very HUGE. The SOHO satellite is in stationary orbit at the LaGrange Point, or about a million miles from Earth. The Sun is 93 million miles from Earth. For comparison, Saturn is 500 million miles from the Sun. When we observe planets traveling past the Sun, we are seeing a very small portion of their very large orbit, thus it appears they are traveling in a straight line. I hope this makes sense.
picassolama 3 years ago
Thanks
dunskie 3 years ago
Also, not all of the planets are passing between the satellite's camera and the Sun. Jupiter and Saturn for example are further from the Sun than we are, so they are obviously passing *behind* the Sun from our perspective.
vortical911 3 years ago
Thanks
dunskie 3 years ago
awesome. i loved the video of the four planets going by there at the end. i'm assuming the Pleiades was the star cluster at the top-left at the end.
vortical911 3 years ago
Yes, you are correct. I apologize for not labeling the cluster...my bad.
picassolama 3 years ago
Great vid, thanks for posting
54spiritedwill54 3 years ago 2
It must be something artificial. There is a rhythm when the beam stretch out. And there are 2 kinds of beams one is lighter and the other less. They both function in rhytmic movement and in contrast .Watch the video carefully.
NO COMET MOVES LIKE THIS IN RHYTHM.
NASA IS FULL OF SHIT!
webstarcom 4 years ago
Lol dude
this is a red herring, a futile attempt to distract people from the 1000+ mile long absolutely huge spaceships that are trying to stop the sun going nova or trying to perk it up to prevent an ice age
Space ships almost as big as NASA's lies
Come on Sun!!!
nicolasin1 3 years ago
amazing footage. a new view in the cosmos for me
big thx
sen2k 4 years ago
becaause the comet doesnt have a iron core like earth and the magnetosphere around it or atleast a symetrical one like earth does then yes it would fizzle away into plasma cause of it constantly getting bombarded with particles of wateva at light speed..
sauce1234561 4 years ago
not all the comets are made of ice...NASA lies
vitto 4 years ago
hmmm...do enlighten us...I'm intrigued! What are the others made of?
picassolama 4 years ago
anything they don't wan't you to know about
is in that comet lol if they where made of ice they would colapse evaporate before they would even get close to the sun lol
photon101203 4 years ago
wow truly amazing to watch im a big fan of comets and shooting stars thank you very much...the music was very good with the vid too
Ravedaze 4 years ago
Sorry
Thunderbolts of gods
at google video
JoCa555 4 years ago
The reaction is only explainble, when the sun and the comets are considered as electrical charged bodys. So what is happening that there is a plasma reaktion on very high levels. This is also called " electrical universe"
See the dokumentation: Thunderbelts of God.
JoCa555 4 years ago
looks like they "the two craft" did a cannonnall into the pool and the splash afterwards
sjpones3 4 years ago
if a comet is patially made of ice then how could it get so close to the sun without fizzling away into nothing??? I think they are under intelligent control, just my opinion
sjpones3 4 years ago
Nice to see some quality videos finally. Check out my vids sometime if you like clips like this. Usually I'm posting at videos.lostfrog 'dot' com.
cooper122a 4 years ago
Damn, sorry for double comments, this thing is giving me jip!
Area51Productions 5 years ago
I posted a reply to your comment, but it's not showing up for me, don't know about you. It's ok, we're both on LiveVideo :-)
picassolama 5 years ago
Pretty conclusive proof, great work and thanks for uploading.
Area51Productions 5 years ago
Great vid, thanks for posting
MreViewer 5 years ago
Where is the awesome didgeridoo music from? That made me want to blow the dust out of my own.
jetcenterjohn 5 years ago
I apologize, I usually give credit to the music! It's Steve Turner's "Homage" from his album Ajna Hara: Rhythm Of The Sky. I would blow the dust out of my didgeridoo, but I can't play it that well anyway o_O
picassolama 5 years ago
Totally amasing Bryan san!!!!
LARC0 5 years ago
Thanks Mike...it was in response to a video questioning the origin of these objects. Just had to give my two cents!
picassolama 5 years ago