Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which popular atheist author Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
with this technology we could have defeated the energy gridlock, the population explosion we would have a strong hedge against nuclear or bioterrorism, but instead we mothball our greatest technology so we can continue feeding welfare bums paying for uninsured sluts to have abortions and shooting galleries for the junkies to shoot their junk in. The human race fully deserves its impending extinction for not taking advantage of incredibly simple technology that could turn it all around. :(
@coinageboy No buddy, it's you who are pathetic with your racist, junior high insults. As for labelling yourself 'a scientist'! I respect science and real scientists, but real scientists have better arguments than treating someone with who you have a difference of opinion as 'fat and asthmatic'.
@brianwurst1234 Most bombs explode outward. But They were going to focus the blast downward and use that massive explosion as propulsion. lol Like take a firecracker, and put it in a steel tube, instead of blowing apart, the bang all comes out the end, and pushs it up. Fast........
1. I'm not jewish. Neither I nor anyone in my family is even remotely jewish. We're german-irish.
2. No, I'm not asthmatic. Not in the fucking slightest.
3. I get laid plenty.
4. I seriously doubt you are a fucking scientist when you go around making fun of people for being "jewish and asthmatic" and talking about me not getting laid. That's far closer to a moronic redneck fucktard than anything I've ever heard from someone with an IQ higher than the double digits.
Did he say it would take 800 to get into orbit? 800 nukes? So the people on the spaceship were obviously planned to be the last humans left after launch then right? Okay, so they launch from orbit. Did I hear something about 2000 nukes to get to where ever? Like, our entire stock of nukes to propel one spaceship? It seems like they could scale this thing down significantly and just have a dozen or so nukes propel it a lot faster. Better than sending a Marriott hotel into space...
I suppose they are smaller nukes then. And I would like to correct you on something. Ivy Mike was most certainly NOT the biggest nuclear weapon ever test. The russians tested a bomb known as either Tsar Bomba or Big Ivan and it was the largest nuclear device detonated at ~50 megatons.
The smallest spherical assembly was the W-54 "Davy Crockett" which was rated at roughly 5 ton yield. The Tzar Bomba (a 4-stage thermonuclear device) was tested in it's "Clean" configuration with a rating of 57 megatons, and was rated at 100 megatons in it's 'dirty' (uranium tamper) configuration.
We need to build this so we can have real scifi spaceships.
As for the radiation if you use a fusion reaction for the last stage in the bombs and build a huge steel platform from which to launch it on some worthless rock of a desert island fall out would not be an issue.
Irrational is to think that anywhere inside and even outside of our limited reach there is a planet more suited for us and more miraculous than Earth.
It IS in space and there is life here, though you have to wonder if there is intelligent life here.
also notice that is says "770 Rem/SHOT" on the chart, not "rad". 770 rem is defined as acute radiation poisoning, and almost 100% chance of death after 14 days.
Few investments pay the substantial dividends of space exploration. Better that the taxpayers invest in humanity's future than in war, bureaucracy or pork.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Investing in health, education, and the environment is more important. The repair of Mother Earth should be man (scam) kind's future. Will scamkind simply fly away to Saturn leaving its raped mother behind? Judging from how shallow all these technocrats are, I guess the answer is yes.
"Technocrats" aren't afflicted with irrational Earth worship. Educated people with scientific perspectives know the Earth is 1 planet amid untold billions. As Freeman Dyson has argued, it's the destiny of life to expand via humanity beyond the Earth and green the endless frontier beyond. In the process, education would be furthered as the necessary scientific expertise is trained. Using space resources will mean less reliance on Earth's. Earth may be mother, but it's time to leave the cradle.
Freeman Dyson is full of shit. If we were meant to conquer the universe, we'd fart rocket fuel. Nature will not conform to your star drek fantasies. In the short time we've been on this planet, we've destroyed it like a filthy toddler throwing away a candy wrapper. The universe isn't meant for window shopping. The Earth was meant to nourish us and for us to nurture it.
"Earth was meant"? You have personally talked to the Project: Universe development team and asked what was the purpose of our planet and our existence? Care to share their telephone number, I'd like to ask some questions too... but nice to know that we have one person here who knows The Purpose...
absolutely fascinating... but it just goes to show how much the govt is desperately attempting to keep from us! there is a whole universe that has been discovered that we don't know about, collectively, and it has to change! we can handle the truth, goddammit JUST TELL US!!!
What precisely is "govt is desperately attempting to keep from us"? Government's not responsible for educating you. It's you responsibility to EDUCATE YOURSELF about the world and the wider Cosmos.
@Hottides "govt is desperately attempting to keep from us" ==> meaning the US actually finds a practical way of traveling between planets but then tries to erase all knowledge of it from memory
This has been flagged as spam show
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which popular atheist author Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
lightandbeautiful 5 days ago
Comment removed
IntheeyesofMorbo 2 months ago
The whole course of humanity going into space would have been so different if this project had gotten off the ground and worked.
Djinnmeister 5 months ago
with this technology we could have defeated the energy gridlock, the population explosion we would have a strong hedge against nuclear or bioterrorism, but instead we mothball our greatest technology so we can continue feeding welfare bums paying for uninsured sluts to have abortions and shooting galleries for the junkies to shoot their junk in. The human race fully deserves its impending extinction for not taking advantage of incredibly simple technology that could turn it all around. :(
AndrewAngelScar 5 months ago
@coinageboy They were going to do it in space...radiation dissipates after a few months
MoOtJeMan 10 months ago
That's hilarious...
In only 40 years we've forgotten so much.
EdouardDubois 11 months ago 4
Once you understand the physics of space travel you'd rather ride that thing to Mars or beyond then a chemical or solar propelled spacecraft.
Membrane556 1 year ago
my name is george dyson
George97Dyson 1 year ago
@coinageboy No buddy, it's you who are pathetic with your racist, junior high insults. As for labelling yourself 'a scientist'! I respect science and real scientists, but real scientists have better arguments than treating someone with who you have a difference of opinion as 'fat and asthmatic'.
DrZenith 1 year ago
how do you ride a 4000 ton nuclear bomb?
brianwurst1234 1 year ago
@brianwurst1234 Most bombs explode outward. But They were going to focus the blast downward and use that massive explosion as propulsion. lol Like take a firecracker, and put it in a steel tube, instead of blowing apart, the bang all comes out the end, and pushs it up. Fast........
NCAstronut 1 year ago
@brianwurst1234
Carefully.
ChrisInAStrangeLand 1 year ago
@coinageboy
Uh, okay.
1. I'm not jewish. Neither I nor anyone in my family is even remotely jewish. We're german-irish.
2. No, I'm not asthmatic. Not in the fucking slightest.
3. I get laid plenty.
4. I seriously doubt you are a fucking scientist when you go around making fun of people for being "jewish and asthmatic" and talking about me not getting laid. That's far closer to a moronic redneck fucktard than anything I've ever heard from someone with an IQ higher than the double digits.
thomasford 1 year ago
@coinageboy
Well, you're a retard that doesn't know any fucking science, so go kill yourself.
thomasford 1 year ago
Did he say it would take 800 to get into orbit? 800 nukes? So the people on the spaceship were obviously planned to be the last humans left after launch then right? Okay, so they launch from orbit. Did I hear something about 2000 nukes to get to where ever? Like, our entire stock of nukes to propel one spaceship? It seems like they could scale this thing down significantly and just have a dozen or so nukes propel it a lot faster. Better than sending a Marriott hotel into space...
thomasford 1 year ago
The yield of those 800 nukes would be about 2,5% the yield of Ivy Mike, a single nuclear test (and far from the biggest one) during the cold war.
Elukka 1 year ago
Clarification: that's the total yield of all 800 bombs.
Elukka 1 year ago
I suppose they are smaller nukes then. And I would like to correct you on something. Ivy Mike was most certainly NOT the biggest nuclear weapon ever test. The russians tested a bomb known as either Tsar Bomba or Big Ivan and it was the largest nuclear device detonated at ~50 megatons.
thomasford 1 year ago
Comment removed
thirdclass2006 1 year ago
The smallest spherical assembly was the W-54 "Davy Crockett" which was rated at roughly 5 ton yield. The Tzar Bomba (a 4-stage thermonuclear device) was tested in it's "Clean" configuration with a rating of 57 megatons, and was rated at 100 megatons in it's 'dirty' (uranium tamper) configuration.
MadMichigander1313 1 year ago
@MadMichigander1313
Too bad we never went through with it.
thomasford 1 year ago
Damn, nevermind that. I misread what you said and see that you said it was "FAR FROM the biggest one". Sorry.
thomasford 1 year ago
@thomasford actually big nukes would destroy the ship. You would need 800 tiny nukes
mikeyjz 10 months ago
We need to build this so we can have real scifi spaceships.
As for the radiation if you use a fusion reaction for the last stage in the bombs and build a huge steel platform from which to launch it on some worthless rock of a desert island fall out would not be an issue.
Membrane556 2 years ago
retarded audience laughing
peeeete 2 years ago
"Irrational Earth worship" lol
You ignorant little fuck.
Irrational is to think that anywhere inside and even outside of our limited reach there is a planet more suited for us and more miraculous than Earth.
It IS in space and there is life here, though you have to wonder if there is intelligent life here.
esaman 3 years ago
also notice that is says "770 Rem/SHOT" on the chart, not "rad". 770 rem is defined as acute radiation poisoning, and almost 100% chance of death after 14 days.
maxell121 3 years ago 2
Not a real problem, the front half of the propelling board is there just for the weight. Just replace it with lead.
Palpatineli 2 years ago
@Palpatineli Depleted uranium makes for a far thinner, lighter, and more efficient shield
mikeyjz 10 months ago
@mikeyjz I was talking about radiation protection.
Palpatineli 9 months ago
"...radiation does at the crew station 700 rads per shot...."
LOL
maxell121 3 years ago
doses
maxell121 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Agreed, this guy should screw himself and stop wasting taxpayers money.
dar482 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Let's NOT take a rocket to Saturn and say we did. Why waste good taxpayer money on this technocratic bullshit?
castingtherunes 3 years ago
Few investments pay the substantial dividends of space exploration. Better that the taxpayers invest in humanity's future than in war, bureaucracy or pork.
Hottides 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Investing in health, education, and the environment is more important. The repair of Mother Earth should be man (scam) kind's future. Will scamkind simply fly away to Saturn leaving its raped mother behind? Judging from how shallow all these technocrats are, I guess the answer is yes.
castingtherunes 3 years ago
"Technocrats" aren't afflicted with irrational Earth worship. Educated people with scientific perspectives know the Earth is 1 planet amid untold billions. As Freeman Dyson has argued, it's the destiny of life to expand via humanity beyond the Earth and green the endless frontier beyond. In the process, education would be furthered as the necessary scientific expertise is trained. Using space resources will mean less reliance on Earth's. Earth may be mother, but it's time to leave the cradle.
Hottides 3 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Freeman Dyson is full of shit. If we were meant to conquer the universe, we'd fart rocket fuel. Nature will not conform to your star drek fantasies. In the short time we've been on this planet, we've destroyed it like a filthy toddler throwing away a candy wrapper. The universe isn't meant for window shopping. The Earth was meant to nourish us and for us to nurture it.
castingtherunes 3 years ago
If we were meant to nourish the earth we'd consume carbon dioxide, fart oxygen and poop ozone. Sound logic you tree hugging hippie......
thatguy291288 3 years ago 5
If we were meant to nourish the earth we'd consume carbon dioxide, fart oxygen and poop ozone. Sound logic you tree hugging hippie......
thatguy291288 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I heard you the first time, techno-tard. And as usual, your logic is more retarded than ever. Go get a lap dance from your laptop, sad sock.
castingtherunes 3 years ago
"Earth was meant"? You have personally talked to the Project: Universe development team and asked what was the purpose of our planet and our existence? Care to share their telephone number, I'd like to ask some questions too... but nice to know that we have one person here who knows The Purpose...
Kasakkasotnia 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I know more than all you tech-tards.
castingtherunes 3 years ago
1:52 - 1:56
Where in Google is that?
79wx9z 3 years ago
Really inspiring. Major influence in my artwork.
Thanks so much.
boydism08 3 years ago
The truth behind an urban legend. Thanks.
ddball1 3 years ago 3
If thats all NASA's got "on the self" in the advent of an asteroid....we are fucked.
putittogether 3 years ago 4
yamana!
iosu81 3 years ago
absolutely fascinating... but it just goes to show how much the govt is desperately attempting to keep from us! there is a whole universe that has been discovered that we don't know about, collectively, and it has to change! we can handle the truth, goddammit JUST TELL US!!!
ScarDrey 3 years ago 3
only a small fraction of the ppl on this planet can handle the truth,, the majority are blinded by media and ignorance.
tkboyz 3 years ago 3
What precisely is "govt is desperately attempting to keep from us"? Government's not responsible for educating you. It's you responsibility to EDUCATE YOURSELF about the world and the wider Cosmos.
Hottides 3 years ago 10
@Hottides "govt is desperately attempting to keep from us" ==> meaning the US actually finds a practical way of traveling between planets but then tries to erase all knowledge of it from memory
cdoftx 7 months ago
Is he still alive ? Or did an "accident" occur a few days after? lol
stevenaudet 3 years ago 7
i always lol when i see the words "remarkable people" and clinton in the first frame.
CheeezMaster 3 years ago