Added: 2 years ago
From: Acrofan
Views: 65,140
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (84)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Small lens...

  • WTF did you buy this thing to show off or shoot photos? Then shoot already! Darn wasting our time. 63K views that's a lot of wasted time.

  • what a beast!!!.....i want it......

  • @lhlee888 and to further conclude, if white lens are to b so efficent, why not all canon lens b coated with white. My frds shoot in extreme weather n in sunny beaches in tropical island for hrs, for a few weeks, there is no malfunction as reported frm them.

  • @lhlee888 my grandpa n frds been using nikon system for more than 10 yrs. There no issue with white or black color. There is some truth but with canon aggressive marketing, it just an indication that majority of luxury lens belong to white color.

  • beautiful!!

  • Wish I had this. =(

  • Whole black is so sexy. Better than white lens with a black body, it look so mismatch.

  • @wumingkkk white lenses actually prevent the camera and lens to malfunction, black absorbs heat and might cause the camera to malfunction in hot days

  • @lhlee888 Are you fucking out of your mind? You think nikon going to use cheap plastic for $2400.00 lens? Seriously dude get over your stupidity.

  • @jerseyman9080

    *facepalm* you're even dumber! im talking about the colour on the plastic, not the plastic

  • @jerseyman9080

    *facepalm* you're even dumber. i was talking about the colour on the plastic, not the plastic. some nikon fanboys are actually stupid lol

  • @lhlee888 Really dude, get over your stupidity, learn about Chemical reactions, Go back school and take some Physics classes.. Might helps you to understand the theory of Colors, Chemicals and Plastic.. PS I am not a nikon fan boy kiddo, I am an IT engineer i go with smart and intelligent technology.

  • @jerseyman9080

    *facepalm* Prevention is better than cure

  • 0:49

    Do you see small drops on top of it? That's from the poor lookers who saw the price

  • I have this set up....70-200 is on my D3s 80% of the time.

  • would everyone shut the fuck up about MP resolution. resolution is pointless now days. at one point or another when you want a really big print your going to use software regardless. i barely ever see another professional take a photo directly from the camera and print it out on the plotter or whatever equipment you so choose. having more MP resolution is very nice to help with having more detailed and sharper photos. but a 3 chip can do the same. but nikon better get some 3 chips in them cams.

  • @NerdForMIT So True + more MP often cause more noise in the pictures. I prefer less mp but better quality than more mp and not so good quality.

  • @FinlandApollo resolution doesn't cause the noise, it's the gain on each amplifier of each pixel and the design process. by design process CCD chips produce less noise because of coupling. CMOS can be coupled but it is not easy. then you have this LBCAST JFET in the d2h which is pretty much CMOS but with the transfer gate removed and the FD removed. im designing a 2 transistor sensor currently. i have made some improvements to the 3T design though.

  • @NerdForMIT Uhm...what? XD Thats true, thanks for correction

  • that is the physicle form of sex.....in camera form......thats how nice it looks

  • @Xyb3rTech, Go to dentist first Faggot and come back talk to me! if you cant fix your teeth how u can buy i good camera? feel sorry for U!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @deus04rome why would you post the same thing 3 times, dumbass? you know nikon is shitty bout their 12MP shit. and the color rendering of nikon is crap as ever. nikon is for nincompoops like you who don't really think about quality. nikon sucks just like you stab your dick to your mom's a-hole. fucktard

  • @Xyb3rTeCh hahaha Faggot got mad, lol. still feel sorry for U. command more so we know what kind of Faggot R U.

  • @deus04rome not at all. you are the faggot, u mother fuck

  • Comment removed

  • @deus04rome you can suck your nikon and put into your fukin anal, u nikon douche bag

  • @Xyb3rTeCh Anal? U R real Faggot!!!!!!

  • @deus04rome hahaha very funny, mofo. so you keep fucking with your crappy nikon gear? ohh that's so sad to say. well nikon still sucks just like you, fucktard boy

  • @deus04rome sony rules nikon. the fucking problem with nikon is that their fuckin gear is fuckin old and nikon have no plan on updating its crappy lineup. and the most problem with nikon is that they are very fuckin concern in upgrading pixel count. sony now are making 14MP sensors and above for them. and nikon is not happy about it. that is why nikon sucks. CUZ THEY CAN'T MAKE THEIR GOD DAMN SENSORS. Boo Nikon.

  • @Xyb3rTeCh And how much do you think megapixels matters? It's just a picture size.. You can get big prints with 12.1MP.. I prefer Canon, but I still have nothing against Nikon, cause i know that Nikons are still well made and have nothing bigger problems. Canon just feels right in my hands

  • @Xyb3rTeCh Shut-up your mount and google. This sensor make by Nikon. (D3, D700 & D3100 too.) All peoples know that, just some fool don't. (search for chipwork +nikon)

  • @deus04rome hey hey... fucktard! you can't argue with me. you are such a sore loser. _|_ nikon ignorant fanboy

  • @Xyb3rTeCh why should i argue with uneducated and low level like U? I just love U said shit! so ppl know how shitty ur education "white trash"

  • @deus04rome yea right... how do you know that i am such an uneducated person? well that is your fuckin assumption. you dont know anything, fags. nikon is sucks and nikon would be dead if its not for sony. so respect sony. not nikon, else you won't be using nikon crappy piece of shit

  • @Xyb3rTech, Go to dentist first Faggot and come back talk to me! if you cant fix your teeth how u can buy i good camera? feel sorry for U!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • *does want*

  • I'm happy with my D300s,and would love to get this lens,but it is big,heavy,and cost's a lot of hard earned money.

  • the name made me cream my pants

  • if you think Leica better, so just get Leica mother "F" do not spoil the video U poor bastard!!!

  • @deus04rome fuck you, douche, nikon sucks. nikon is a piece of crap gear

  • @Xyb3rTeCh Go fuck ur dentist first and come back talk to me, faggot!!!!!!!!

  • @deus04rome nikon sucks. leica lenses can beat any shitty nikkor for its color and color fringing.

  • I like canon

  • You assholes know nothing about nikon go brush you're stinking yellow teeth

  • @nikonguy102 i dont get it why are you dissing them?

  • hii

  • wow sad to say it turned into a match of egos here. I have no Idea what you are talking about it. Just watch the video and enjoy

  • Manny Pacquiao vs Miguel Cotto on Nov 14 Las Vegas I am using D Movie Nikon D3s.

  • So, was this video shot with another D3s in D-movie mode?

  • CANON EOS 1D MK IV !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • too bad windows sucks

  • too bad Canon BLOWS.

  • Haha and Nikon is OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard

  • IM FU(KING SPEECHLESS

  • iso on this goes to 102,400!!!!!

    And that d700s is going to be a higher pixel camera, not so much like this one for sports.

  • Do you have any idea what your talking about? 99% of people don't even push past ISO 400 unless shooting full auto. Then there would be no point in getting this camera. Oh and, High MP's are pretty much pointless. They are just a gimmick to get you to buy their product. You never really need to go over 7MP. If I'm not shooting RAW I'm shooting Fine JPEG on Medium(About 6 MP) You just need a fast lens.

  • I actually do know what im talking about, and this cameras iso goes to 102,400 if you think that all a camera needs is 400 iso then take that up with Nikon not me.. And the d700s is going to be designed for shooting in a studio like the d3x, i dont make this stuff up, its what they put out.. And im not sure how many commercial photographers you know, but ive never heard of someone who doesnt put their iso above 400.. thats just stupid, if you image has movement then you bump the iso

  • Wow dude, I was shooting professionally with film up to 12,800. Just because you don't use fast speeds doesn't mean anyone else does. Know your equipment and you can anticipate what will happen. You don't have to shoot bad pictures first to then decide what ISO you need.

  • Comment removed

  • @ roundthebendfilms :: you obviously don't print very big files for you to be talking like this,and also doubt you actually know much about the D3 family and it's ability to shoot very low noise pictures at very high ISO's go to google and type Nikon D3 it'll take you about 10 seconds to get to the bit about low noise :)

  • You obviously just know how to read a little paragraph on the internet. I have been able to push high quality 20"x30" Prints with a normal D40 6MP camera. You just have to know how to use photoshop and unsharpen mask. The reason the D3 is able to push such high ISO is because it's FX sensor. So what? Why spend 5k+ on a camera just for ISO then to just get a really fast lens. The camera you use doesn't matter, it's how you compose your shot. The D3 is for people that know both those things.

  • Not dumb amateurs like you who think they know everything about photography and brag that they have the best camera in the world when their best shot is of something meaningless.

  • I agree with you. His D40 against a high mp camera will fall apart fast in an enlargement. My brother has a D40x (it takes wonderful photos) and against my 5D mark II, his images fall apart long before mine. Another advantage for high mp cameras is ability to crop your photos and still get great results.

  • I use a Nikon D300 and FujiFilm S3 Pro.

  • What your saying is ridiculous. I shoot event photography and in those dark situations you can always use a camera that has GOOD high iso performance. It depends on what you are shooting. To try and paint all situations with one brush lets me know you must be a hobbiest talking about things you have no knowledge of.

    As for high MP, errr what?! Dude try shooting commercial photography with a image that is going to end up on a billboard, then come back and talk to us.

  • Obviously you don't shoot commercially because Chase Jarvis uses a regular D3 for billboard prints. You don't know how billboards look like in person. They use dots of color and you don't need to have the sharpest 50MP camera for it to look right on a billboard. Yes you can use it and people do, but it's just a vanity. 99% of people who shoot commercially don't use a Hasselblad. .5% of them 1% probably actually do.

  • Chase Jarvis uses a D3, D3x and a Hasselblad. Depending on the subject matter, where and how it will be published etc determines which he uses. He uses the D3 for shooting sports type editorials like the last scan disk job he did. Get your facts straight. he has tons of videos on his site explaining what he uses, when and why.

    As for myself I have shot for MTV and a host of others. The internet cracks me up, tons of know nothings.

  • You people think you're such know-it-all's. Who cares what camera you have! As long as you know how to compose a shot, you can make a $1,000,000 with a crappy Casio! The point that I have been trying to put out is that you don't NEED to spend thousands on a camera if you don't even know how to use it! I bet you 75% of the people who watched this video would get one because they think they will get better pictures but that's just not how it works! It may be sharper but the photo is meaningless!

  • They wont get it becaus eof better pictures..... around 90% will get this because simply.... its the latest Nikon Model lol.....

    A D90 is all i need lol

  • Exactly! I mean, if the Leica X1 becomes a hit, I will for sure get it as a body upgrade(even if you can't swap lenses). It's a Leica and the quality is amazing. It's also a digital cm rangefinder so it's super small and has a huge sensor (about the same as the D300's in a body smaller than the Leica M9. True passionate artisan photographers never want to lug around 20 lbs. of gear...

  • i agree to that. Leica is simply a marvelous camera. its actually beat nikon and the rest in quality. its sensor really delivers better quality than those normal cameras. and to that, any camera can take nice pictures, depending on the person who takes it. chase jarvis even use this iphone to take pictures. and i can be as good as other's as well. but to some extent the noise control is inferior to those SLRs and compact cam.

  • *it can

  • @Xyb3rTeCh so get Leica than!!!!

  • hi ken rockwell!

    nobody spends $5000+ on a dslr because its the latest. people get this because it meets their needs and it pays

  • see what i said ?

    AROUND 90% will get this because simply its the latest... professionals will buy this because it does meet there needs.... but some stupid rich ass who probs has a D700 then sees this video and will go out and spend several 1000s on the latest model............

  • @KeNuBort why did you say "hi ken rockwell"?

  • @ithree6mafia Because Ken Rockwell was here.

  • This is AWESOME... I guess, i will never have this.. :/

  • there is a good chance nikon will make a D700s. Just like with the previous models. First they had the D3 and 6 months later nikon introduced the D700 for the normal folk.

  • 12.1megapixels?

  • yes. 12.1m.

    and d-movie, fx 9shot(s)/dx 11shot(s) support.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more