the basques(atlanteans) are the original europeans n the origin of the white race,the catalans are blood brothers of the basques.The atlanteans(basques) colonized the world n schooled humanity but the cheatin romans greeks etc concealed this.The atlanteans schooled their asses n the disgustin romans n greeks thanked the atlanteans by turnin on the atlanteans n have u believe the atlanteans n atlantis didnt even exist..wtf?unmask these sons of a bitch
WOW, THIS IS REALLY INTERESTING.. I AM GLAD I AM NOT DEPENDING ON YOUTUBE TO KNOW THAT WHITE PEOPLE ARE JUST LIKE BLACKS, SOME DUMB APPLES IN EVERY BUNCH.
Summerians or Mesopotamia where not white skin people they where like Arab or muslims today which are Brown Skin people that look like Saddam Hussein!
this people where euroasian not white,this people where what you white people call sand niggers! you guys don't like arabs but this people where arabs!
The statue of Gudea looks white-arabic or white-asian. and did you mean racial or facial? it's really annoying how absolutly everything keeps moving toward the screen.
@idasputum goy does not mean cattle, refer to the email i sent you or ask any jewish person if you can manage to pull your head out of your ass. oh yeh, go out this weekend and buy yourself some pussy, you sound like you need it bad.
@IdaSputum, shut the fuck up. youre obviously mentally disturbed Goy means a non-jewish person and yes its sort of degoratory and no jews arent interested in killing non-jews so shut your stupid ass cock holster you call a mouth.
@sgtmasters GOYIM mreans cattle you lying Zionist, and it isn't the Orthodox Jews that want to kill us - its the racial supremacist Zionists. -which in clude Christian Zionists like Bush, Muskum Zionists but Jewish Zionists have stolen USA,govt & hijacked the banks. NAZIS who want to make us all into Palestinians
@gravityp28 BUT white people DONT RUN shit. ZIONISTS run shit Zionists see whites as a sub-species to be destroyed. Along with blacks
ALL NON-Zionists are termed "GOYIM" by Zionists. GOYIM means 'CATTLE'.
Its why the NDAA signed sneakily on New Year 2012 by Zionist Banker puppet Obama, while we were partying - MEANS USA is now OFFICIALLY A ZOO, worse than a jail as ALL RIGHTS removed.
Americans can now be hunted, jailed, NO charge, NO lawyer NO trial FOREVER & or killed
@IdaSputum oohh so the zionists are purple!...the zionist have been shiting on black since slavery..now there sharing the love with low level whites its a big deal to shit on them ,but it is dnt get me wrong..my piont was how come the info of this video dats basically telln me these white civilizations came b4 the ancient egyptians or were better than them not mainstreamd on tv..but if dats the case why are they tryna stress that ancient egyptian were not ppl of color..
@gravityp28 Its a big deal to shit on anyone inc blacks shitting on albino blacks -- too many liars of every colour with ego problems who are determined to be the ones who came first - like it matters?. I'm white but i cant be bothered to view this actual vid. Its all bollocks. GOD alone knows
IM JUST SPAMMIN sites to alert people to SMASH the NDAA
Zionists want to kill all of us 'cattle'. 1 political party runs the world - NAZIon - they moved to USA
@IdaSputum well ofcorse theres liar of every color ...i juss wana piont out the most odbvious ones in history..but they control history....
blacks shittin on albino blacks.... wat about hitler tryna kill all the jews and every black he saw along the way.. i didnt get yur piont...but yur right .GoD knows..nd soon light will reveal the real truths that these ppl you warn us of use against us..
@gravityp28 Hitler was a Rothschild child, - who knew? He was funded by Zionist Jews, - we didn't know because its the biggest con ever spun, & they run school curricula so we wouldnt catch on, they run media to keep the lie going.& they turned historical study of WW2 into a 'hate crime' & make innocent people do time. But you're right, LIGHT is coming to sterilise their shit
The out of Africa theory has been disproven, there were plenty of "genetic hotspots" found throughout the world in India, Asia, Europe as well as Africa. Albinism is a gene, whites do not carry that gene, except those afflicted. We are not black people, that's ridiculous. From the moment humans walked the earth to the discovery of the earliest white remains was not enough time to evolve from negroid to caucasian.
Good stuff! There's no reason not to be proud of our white ancestors. I'm sure all the racist blacks have been hating on this video but let's not forget that the first documented slave masters were the Nubians and, wait for it---they were black!
@LSKEJ88 how cud you believe the ancestors of slave masters telln the ancestors of slaves thier ppl started slavery....so wat yur sayn is the nubians invented it..they were the fist to realize yu cud tie a muh fukka up then make him work 4 free..lmao..i wud say,the 1st ppl smart enuff 2 submit a person or tie a muhfukka up cud have possibly invented slavery..yur white..i guessin you shud be thinkng yur smarter than that..right? and u shud be proud of your white ancestor..but dont white wash mine
the neanderthal thing i have a friend that looks like a neanderthal if scientist saw him they would think he were the missing link and by the way hes white. And native americans that are genetically tested thoroughbreds have been known to have blue eyes seen it myself Oh did you know the first pharaoh of Egypt was dna tested and they believe hes from either Ireland northern France or from somewhere up that away not trying to fuel your racism though.
White people's ancestor - are those Indian appearance, White skin and black hair Europeans.
You can look at the painting of Minoan, ancient Apollo statue, Sumerian, and the oldest Buddha statue in Afghanistan, they are the same race, same civilization before the Great Flood..
The world is only 6000 years old. The white race has existed in about 2,600 of those years. In Biblical times people lived a lot longer than we do.....remember Methusla lived over 900 years old. so when scientist find old bones of man the are dating them a lot older than they really are.
@MsKittenz1 Ever heard of radiometric dating? Maybe you should check in to it. It shows clearly that the earth is a lot older then 6000 years. Fossil evidence shows that man didn't live at the same time as the dinosaurs. Where did all the dinosaur bones come from? You are ignoring a whole host of science from many different disciplines if you think the earth is only 6000 years old...
Maybe that's where "CLOTHES COMES FROM" if you lack "Melanin" you need to wear something , to protect your skin. Africans were always almost naked or almost naked. Maybe the more albino type person needed the clothes. Since the white/albino type humans ruled after a while they were like wear clothes. They made it law.
Right people moved ocassionally, every few thousand years something happends and people move, or ice ages occurr, and people are genocided.. It is wrong to assume the people in africa/egypt/india/china have allways been there and are responsible for everything there. As the evidence suggests (anthroplogic, statues, archaeological, historiographic, pictographic, etc..etc.. show, sumerians are 2m+ nordics, now they are smaller and less inteligent due to contamination of bloodlines..
The person who made this video is such dumbass. The swastika originated from india and spread through buddhism. Torcharian themselves adopted buddhism religion an than passed it to the chinese.
Torcharians were even slaves to many chinese dynasties, tibetan, mongol, turkic.
@mongolANDtamerlane No, there are plenty of sawastica findings dated thousands of years before buddism. Just google it before calling people dumbass.
However, the neandertal heritage in all out-of-africa humans are pretty established today, but this vid may predate recent important geneology findings.
@AngeCord And they all originated from india first. The oldest swastika originated from india, and the spread of swastika to other countries is because of Buddhism, all scholars and historian agree with this.
@mongolANDtamerlane Buddhism came about 450 BC. There are plenty of swasticas findings outside india that are a lot elder than that. Why don't you spend 5 minutes on the internet to find out if you are wrong before posting?
@AngeCord Why don't show me proof is instead of talking so much. Like where? because all historians agree that the oldest swastika originated from India, and most of the spread of this sign happened from Buddhism and adopted from India. And european swastika was spread by the iranians. it's well documented the iranian population adopted the sign from India. Torcharians adopted it from the indians through buddhism when Torcharian were still under the rule of Han Dynasty and Xiongnu.
@mongolANDtamerlane Instruction for idiots: Type 'swastica' in Google. Press search. Read top results. Remember that buddhism is less than 2500 years old.
Just to be clear: I'm not arguing that the swastica spread out of India, it's just that it spread to other regions earlier than buddhism.
Instruction for dumb fucks: Type 'swastica' in Google. Press search. Click on wikipedia. Remember the POINT is that swastica originated from India and spread mostly through buddhism.
Just to be clear AGAIN: I'm not saying swastica all around the world happened because of Buddhism but it happened MOSTLY because of Buddhism, like the torcharians and iranians such as the Kushans who documented that they adopted the religion.
@mongolANDtamerlane I fail to see how this is the case when the swasticka is really old, they even found one that is over 12,000+ years old (last ice age), now it gets alot harder to find things during the last ice age due to flooding, so whilst it is probably much, much older than that, we can not tell how much older at the moment... Just do a google search.. It did not originate in india as popularly believed...
I'm not in a mood to listen to your fairy tale, it's well known by all scholars even by european scholars that it originated in India. The meaning of swastika symbol also originated from India, and was spread by Buddhism. The term aryan also originated from India, which means noble. The one you claim that is found 12,000+ years old is coincidental, there many other signs and symbols that appear similar to each other but are not related, It's just coincidence.
@mongolANDtamerlane i just looked up the swastika and it ineed said that the earliest finding of the swastika was found in the indus valley civilization of ancient india
@AngeCord i just looked up the swastika and it ineed said that the earliest finding of the swastika was found in the indus valley civilization of ancient india
@ChineseHOME1 hey fucktard, nothing is such as "IN BETWEEN DNA."
Just look at the obvious, both Black people and white people has bigger skulls, more masculines, and taller people in general, so their is no chance that a black with white couple would have a Asian siblings.
Blue eyes are not a caucasian exlusive feature, its a recesive trait found sometimes even in mongolia and rarely in africa. It's not exclusive to just albinos in africa either, sometimes in blacks but rare. That's my only nitpick with the video.
@osiris6364 Go away Afro-centric black racist, we don't need Blacks coming on videos about White history trying to tell us what our history is and isn't.
lol still trying to still history smh you've only been on the planet for 6,000 plus years, many blacks are made to have different feature they dont just have wide noses they come in varius shapes and sizes, stop it, just stop it. Just like dinosours were made up to decieve the people some of this is made up, not all but some.
@aivscp03 Sorry but we don't need Afro-Centric black racists coming on our videos about our history trying to tell us what our history is and isn't. We've been here alot longer than 6,000 years racist boy.
According to the Bible, Torah, Koran, whichever one you choose, Mesopotamia aka Babylon was built by a black Cushite Hamite named Nimrod. " God is not a man that he should lie."
Cont.. hopelessly incapable of acquiring the knowledge requisite to progress. It was southern colored peoples everywhere, in China, in Central America, in India, Mesopotamia, Syria, Egypt and Crete who gave the northern white peoples civilization
Quotes from Bishop William Montgomery Brown: "For the first two or three thousand years of civilization, there was not a civilized white man on the earth. Civilization was founded and developed by the swarthy races of Mesopotamia, Syria and Egypt, and the white race remained so barbaric that in those days an Egyptian or a Babylonian priest would have said that the riffraff of white tribes a few hundred miles to the north of their civilization were
Skeletons of the Mediterranean type have been found throughout Middle Africa, Southwest Asia, Mesopotamia, Indo-Pakistan, Central Asia and China. It is no secret that the founders of ancient Egypt, Elam, Sumer and the Indus Valley were all of the Mediterranean type. These Mediterranean people called themselves: KUSHITES
To make the Sumerians “white”, the textbooks print pictures of artifacts dating to the Gutian rule of Lagash, to pass them off as the true originators of Sumerian civilization. No Gutian rulers of Lagash are recognized in the Sumerian King List
For example, Francois Lenormant (1837-1883) made it clear, following the research of Rawlinson, that the Elamite and Sumerians spoke genetically related languages
In Rawlinson’s day the (agglutinative Turanian speaking) Sumerian people were recognized as Akkadian or Chaldean, while the Semitic speaking blacks were called Assyrians. the problem lies with latecomer to the research (Julius Oppert (1825-1905). Oppert was a German born of Jewish parents
The father of assyriology(HENRY RAWLINSON) put this issue to rest if you study futher, Rawlinson was surprised during his research to discover that the founders of the Mesopotamian civilization were of Kushite (Cushite) origin. He made it clear that the Semitic speakers of Akkad and the non-Semitic speakers of Sumer were both Black or Negro people who called themselves sag-gig-ga “Black Heads
To make the Sumerians “white” textbooks print pictures of artifacts dating to the Gutian rule of Lagash, to pass them off as the true originators of Sumerian civilization. No Gutian rulers of Lagash are recognized in the Sumerian King List.
@TheJones1957 Take your Afro-Centric, black racist white people hating black supremacist butt back to your Afro-Centric videos. We whites do not need you blacks trying to tell us what our history is & is not.
For Oppert to have debated this issue with Rawlinson, who deciphered the cuneiform script, would have meant that he would have had to accept the fact that Semites were Black. There was no way Oppert would have wanted to acknowledge his African heritage, given the Anti-Semitism experienced by Jews living in Europe
It is strange to some observers that Oppert never criticized Rawlinson who had proposed the Turanian origin of the Ki-en-gi (Sumerians, Kangars). But this was not strange at all. Oppert did not attack Rawlinson who was still alive at the time because he knew that Rawlinson said the Sumerians were the original Scythic and Turanian people he called Kushites. Moreover, Rawlinson made it clear that both the Akkadians and Sumerians were Blacks
In Rawlinson’s day the (agglutinative Turanian speaking) Sumerian people were recognized as Akkadian or Chaldean, while the Semitic speaking blacks were called Assyrians. the problem lies with latecomer to the research (Julius Oppert (1825-1905). Oppert was a German born of Jewish parents
The father of assyriology(HENRY RAWLINSON) put this issue to rest if you study futher, Rawlinson was surprised during his research to discover that the founders of the Mesopotamian civilization were of Kushite (Cushite) origin. He made it clear that the Semitic speakers of Akkad and the non-Semitic speakers of Sumer were both Black or Negro people who called themselves sag-gig-ga “Black Heads
Again , Africans came into Middle East and settled. They came as immigrant groups like the Kushites, the Egyptians, the Punitians/Phoenicians (People of Punt). They blended together and became the later Black Israelites, the Black Syrians and Canaanites) They established themselves in the land and built many amazing cultures and civilizations. The builders of these civilizations maintained very close trade and cultural linkages with their African motherland
@dudley1957 Take your Afro-Centric white people hating black racist black supremacist butt on back to your Afro-Centric videos & stay off of White vidoes. Whites don't need you coming on our videos about our history telling us what our history is and isn't.
To make the Sumerians “white”, the textbooks print pictures of artifacts dating to the Gutian rule of Lagash, to pass them off as the true originators of Sumerian civilization. No Gutian rulers of Lagash are recognized in the Sumerian King List
For example, Francois Lenormant (1837-1883) made it clear, following the research of Rawlinson, that the Elamite and Sumerians spoke genetically related languages
Controversy surrounding the Kushite/African/Black origins of the Elamites, Sumerians, Akkadians and “Assyrians” is simple and yet complicated. It involves both the racism exhibited toward the African slaves in the Western Hemisphere and Africans generally which led to the idea that Africans had no history; and the need of Julius Oppert to make Semites white, to accommodate the “white” ancestry of European Jews
Slow your role, I have never stated, in any of my comments. One race was better than other. Never...... Also, I never communicated on the topics of USA, Black Presidents and that kind of stuff. One race.......if that was the case, we would not be having this conversation. I am not the preachy guy.......
The Eurpoean who has no melanin is the LAST race. All peoples on the PLANET were dark skin. Civilizations were already here before. The Myans, Aztecs, Nubians, Egyptians, Persians, Asians, these people outdate the European B and everything he knows he learned and Begin to plagerize early on as his own. His Zodiak was already created by the Africans, Aztecs, Mayans etc. The minority who has no culture wants to control the majority that gave him his culture
This early result has been confirmed by two additional genetic studies of Neanderthal remains from different parts of Europe, showing that the Neanderthals were closely related to each other, but very distantly related to us. The genetic data is incontrovertible - modern Europeans trace their recent ancestry to Africa, in common with everyone else in the world
@TheJones1957 This early result has been confirmed by two additional genetic studies of Neanderthal remains from different parts of Europe, showing that the Neanderthals were closely related to each other, but very distantly related to us. The genetic data is incontrovertible - modern Europeans trace their recent ancestry to Africa, in common with everyone else in the world
Of the thousands of human mitochondrial sequences have been obtained from people all over the world, not one is anywhere near as divergent as Krings' Neanderthal sequence. Neanderthals fall well outside the range of genetic variation found in the human species - and therefore they represent a separate species
@TheJones1957 Of the thousands of human mitochondrial sequences have been obtained from people all over the world, not one is anywhere near as divergent as Krings' Neanderthal sequence. Neanderthals fall well outside the range of genetic variation found in the human species - and therefore they represent a separate species
This date means that the man who gave rise to the vast majority of western Europeans lived around 30,000 years ago - consistent with a recent African diaspora, and again showing that Neanderthals could not have been direct ancestors of modern Europeans
@TheJones1957 This date means that the man who gave rise to the vast majority of western Europeans lived around 30,000 years ago - consistent with a recent African diaspora, and again showing that Neanderthals could not have been direct ancestors of modern Europeans
Caucasians did NOT evolve from Cro-Magnons in Europe. It is a common misconception that Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon were the forerunners of Modern Man. Actually Modern Man is much older than both of them.date for the origin of M173 is around 30,000 years ago
@TheJones1957 Caucasians did NOT evolve from Cro-Magnons in Europe. It is a common misconception that Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon were the forerunners of Modern Man. Actually Modern Man is much older than both of them.date for the origin of M173 is around 30,000 years ago
Caucasians (Whites), and Mongols (Chinese), as sub-sets of the Black race: they lack the genetic diversity of the Black race, and as such; they carry only a few of the phenotypes of the Black race
White" haplogroups; like R1 and R2, are instead, indisputably "Black" haplogroups. As always; all roads lead "Back" to the Black man
Modern White European Y-DNA which clearly shows that there is NO uniquely "White" haplogroups; but rather, all White DNA is derived from Black haplogroups
@TheJones1957 hey preachy guy, exactly white people evolved from black people and black people are still black people which according to our theory of evolution means that the white man is the next step in our evolution...
This whole race thing of white people are better and black people are better because of this and that is retarded, we are all people with different colour skin. BUT we are still people. One race.
Speaking of culture taking culture, USA, black president, stfu.
Throughout the video you use the term "white". Were any of these people really white in the modern US sense? Would a Sumerian be considered white in modern US society or would they be considered "middle eastern"? Caucasoid, yes, but white? It seem a little dishonest IMO
@TheJones1957 Sumerians depicted themselves as blue eyed which in your theory of Negroids is not a black trait. Im giving a 8/10 but still calling troll
It was thought that Neanderthals anatomic adaptations to cold had brought about a lightning of the skin, and thus played a part in the evolution of White people. But scientific studies indicate that modern White people, show no genetic evidence of admixture with Neanderthals. It now appears that their evolution was much simpler and more direct The ancient sumerians were not Caucasids, they were Negroids.
@TheJones1957 Wrong. The only ones who do not have Neanderthal DNA are Africans/Negroids. There was a scientific article about this not too long ago. Europeans are about 2% Neanderthal. Also Ancient Sumerians were not Negroid they were Proto Indo European thus Caucasoid. Many European languages today have comparable roots.
@TheJones1957 You need to do more research dude, it has in fact came out that all NON-Africans have at least 1-4 % Neanderthal DNA on both the Male & Female line LOL.
@buffyjosmom White Lie............ The Ancient people of Europe was the San Bush man type. 45,000 B.C. The Great Glacial Ice Sheets that covered most of Europe started to melt and a group, or groups, of these Khoisan type peoples walked across the Gibraltar straits and entered Europe.
@TheJones1957 It was thought that Neanderthals anatomic adaptations to cold had brought about a lightning of the skin, and thus played a part in the evolution of White people. But scientific studies indicate that modern White people, show no genetic evidence of admixture with Neanderthals. It now appears that their evolution was much simpler and more direct
I'm not sure if the Neanderthal connection is a bad thing since it's been discovered that it wasn't a lumbering dolt. Neanderthal possessed a 20% larger cranial capacity than modern man. It wasn't very athletic either, thus it had to rely on its wits.
The typical Neanderthal was an athlete of the kind of weight lifters or of the heavy weight wrestlers. Maybe was not fast running, but certainly was a very strong.
@Ozzrya91 White people, and Europeans are not automatically the same thing. If there are 30+ thousand year old remains found in Europe, it's not a white person, cause there is no such thing as a 30+ thousand year old white person. The white race is 6,000 to 10,000 years old...
Nice music but you've been proven wrong about Neanderthal man, i suspect Neanderthal mixed with the surrounding races and became the cro-magnons, a direct transition 500,000 years of culture, and yes Neanderthals where white, modern Europeans inherited the Caucasian appearance from Neanderthal.
@spindlegrinder Appreciate your comment. This video was made before that fact was known. Also, the many anti-whites of the world use the neanderthal connection as some sort of weapon to act like the white race were animals, when in fact, they come from the same ancestral lineage. I'm quite aware that I was wrong as far as that part of the vid goes, simply because these scientific facts were not available to the public yet. But, that doesn't help their argument much...so I'm fine with it. Cheers.
@lucidmindful You could remake the video, you did a good job the first time, Neanderthals where more highly advanced than they've been given credit for and where around long before cro-magnon man was, I suspect history is as it always has been and that is that Europeans where more advanced from the beginning
even though that idea is not politically correct it is true
Ain't no way in the hell, if you use real anthrology, can you trace the white man (as a people) any further than 10,000 years ago tops. White people come from black people. Period. The white race is a new race. Anything else is bullshit.....
@thatswhatisaidyeah There is a theory that I read lately that says that 10,000 years ago all the people of the earth were dark skinned until a genetic mutation emerged where some people developed lighter skin. Maybe you read the same theory but I think you missed the part that said skin color is only one characteristic of race. The theory says that all people were dark skinned, not that all people were negro.
@thatswhatisaidyeah a negro is a member of the negroid race, a race distinguished not merely by the color of their skin. For instance an Indian(subcontinent) may have dark skin but is not negro. It wasn't until the late 1800s that three races of man were catagorized. Prior to that time any dark skinned person was properly called a negro. All of the races have distinctly unique DNA but are all of the same species.
@SuperJat78 The correct term is "devolved". Black humans were on the planet first, so Black people evolved. Since whites are extracted from blacks, they are devolved. Devolved people were given dominion over the world, so you have a hellish crap world now. That's how it goes...
@thatswhatisaidyeah caucasians aren't all white. The theory goes that about 10,000 years ago all caucasians were dark just like the Arabs and Indians. All the mongoloids were dark skinned as well and although these other two races were dark skinned they were not negroid. Lack of malanin is believed to be a biological adaptation in order to better absorb vitamin D in regions with long winters and less exposure to sunlight.
@thatswhatisaidyeah First of all I didn't say that lack of sunlight makes you white. I said the lack of melanin was a biological adaptation for absorbing vitamin D in a climate that has limited sunlight. That doesn't mean that just because one group develops that adaptation that all other groups in the same region will develop it as well. Look at some pictures of eskimos. Some have very light skin which is the same adaptation caucasians made.
@rooster26730 I see where you are going with your question. If white people do trace their anscestry back to Africa that doesn't mean they evolved from negros. Skin color is only one characteristic of race and it is misleading to think all caucasians are "white" Indians and Arabs are also caucasian even if they are as black as negros.
@thatswhatisaidyeah They are light, but they ain't white. A white man has his own genetics. I just don't think climate turns a black man, into a white man. Dark and light differences in skin tone, yes. An albino black person has a lack of melanin, but it's still a black person. There is more to being a member of the white race, than just lack of melanin. I believe whites as a race, were made by interbreeding, or selective breeding within a group of earlier people.
@thatswhatisaidyeah You got shit for brains. As I said before I didn't say lack of sunlight makes you white as you claimed as I said. I said that lack of melanin is a biological adaptation to absorb vitamin D in regions with less sunlight. Caucasians adapted to this as well as eskimos and other groups. It isn't a disease.
@rooster26730 Damn, you got a little pissy there. Ok fine, maybe light skin helps absorb vitamin A in the whole climate thing. One of the questions was, where do white people come from? Not why white people have a lack of melanin. I think they are bred. A particular bred breed of human. That's all. Didn't say it was a disease...
@thatswhatisaidyeah "I believe whites as a race, were made by interbreeding, or selective breeding within a group of earlier people. "
There is no Archeological, Darwinian proof, 1 single trace of your claim.There was no evolution of any race from other; black race did not evolve from some "Lucy", yellow race did not evolve from African, white did not evolve from black, red or african... also; you have interbreeding in India, Mesopotamia and no race was evolved from this mixture..they are brown
@thatswhatisaidyeah the origin of all human great races; white, black, red, yellow is well described in Vedas... All came from outside (before they've started to mix - in cca 55 000 Bc)
@VendPrekmurec Don't care what "Vedas" says. Huiman races did not all appear at the same time. That is unscientific, and fantasy. Lighter races are newer races (generally)....
@rooster26730 every dr. of biology knows that so called "Darwinian theory" is just a theory and more or less belief - there is no indirect link between so called Homo Erectus - Lucy - Homo Sapien evolution... there is even bigger gap between white race, yellow, red and black race... without any traces of evolution, albinism, and other physiological changes. That's why Darwinian theory is so attacked by Creationists.But in fact their theories - both Creationist and Darwinian are based on Bible &
@VendPrekmurec The word theory is commonly misunderstood in Science. Most people use the word theory when they should use the word hypothesis IE there's a lot of gas in my oil, my theory is that my fuel pump is broken. This is not how Science uses the word. A theory, when used by Scientists, is an explanation reached that most Scientists agree on after the evidence has been examined.
@VendPrekmurec "hypothesis without any proofs is a theory for me" Well a hypothesis is a hypotheis and your opinion is not a qualifier for it to be one. The Theory of Evolution is backed up by overwhelming evidence. It isn't necessary to produce a missing link. The evidence is substantial without it. I don't understand how you can claim that Darwinian Theory is based on the Bible.
@rooster26730 Sumerian myths... of Adapas / Adamas / Adam. Creationists believe that 1. human was Adam (Adapa ; in Sumeria as half human, half non human - saurian - serpent - "image of god" - the "created one " (clone) - manipulation with human DNA) as well Darwinists believe that 1. human was Adam (they seek his "ancestry" (over Lucy). But believe me, they will never find it. Why? Because there was no "1. human" on this planet, no evolution of any race from sub humans... All came from OUTSIDE
@rooster26730 many archeologists know about human artifacts found bellow 70 m of coal layer... Many people know about Antediluvian civilizations... but science & bible does not allow them to speak about it. They will be attacked immediately by "scholars" and "academics" and creationists... many people lost their jobs because they believed - into "forbidden archeology".
@rooster26730 Russia was a mother land of white race - they all came there after Great Ice Age (cca 110 000 BC). This migration from Hyperborea was called "Paska or Pashet" (in old Slavic - from which was derived Sanskrit) means "PASSover"... or also called "Great night", "Uskrs" (krsnuti - "to enliven" - compare with "Hindu" Krishna - which comes from old Slavic "pagan" god Krst-na ("twice born one, incarnated god, ressurected one") - the word was derived into Egypt and later into "Christ"
@rooster26730 with other words; "Easter" as "Christian" tradition predates Christianity - and has roots in Slavic Vedism ("paganism" - as a mockery)... the original word from North pole (of all white race) was called Paska (it is NOT a hebrew word for "exodus" ! )
@thatswhatisaidyeah light skin is a newer adaptation not a new race. If you were to take a group of Indians(they are caucasian) who developed light skin they would not be a new race, merely the same race with a new characteristic. Imagine if a group of negroids developed white skin. They would not be "white" they would still be negroid but with light skin.btw I don't care what the vedas say either.
@rooster26730 There's nothing to follow up with buddy. We already went over light skin and climate connection. We already went over how I think white people and indians and other grafted people got here. And black people without melanin (like albino) are still black. White people are a race of people, that are not black people with no melanin. What the hell do you want me to say? Just read over the exchange, and have a nice life...
@thatswhatisaidyeah I already have a nice life but thanks anyway. You're an ignorant racist with poor logic and no insight. I think we both know I'm not your buddy and if you really don't have anything else to say then just stfu. You don't have to respond to me but if I see you write something ignorant and racist I'll be sure to comment on it.
You clearly do no research an matter you argue about. As You just goggled my jp widney quote and you received Dubois book were he quotes JP widney. I retraced your steps and find your methods to be inadequate
Another thing chemistry has everything to do with the word khemet, as it was moors/arabs/blacks who taught the euros chemstry in which you translated the word alchemy which comes from arabic whom got it from khemet.Yes khemet means black soil, never said it did not
@youngcatlaflare You said Khemet means black. Your exact words. Blacks taught Europeans absolutely nothing. Alchemy, chemistry's precursor, existed in Europe before Arabs and Moors had anything similar to it. Chemistry was a completely European invention.
I will quote from the race life of the arayn volum 2 page 238 again for your conivent since you do not research but google."Back in centuries which are scarcely historic where history gives indeed only vague hintings are traces of a widespread primitive civilization,crude,imperfect,garish,barbaric yet ruling the world of that age from its seats of power in the valleys of the ganges and the euphrates and the nile and it was of the black race.The first babylon seems to have been built by a negro
@youngcatlaflare Keep quoting things, not one bit of it is true, from a reliable source, up to date, or remotely relevant. I told you before, I don't trust your quotes. You're a liar in denial.
LOL TA-Seti does not exist, bro i will continoul bombarad you with quotes and historical evidence all. But before we get to that. Please explain your reluctant and out right denial that blacks were the founders of all things, from mathmatics which comes from maat an afrikan deity, or chemstiry which comes from khemt(black),language etc?
@youngcatlaflare It's only denial if what I was denying was not true. First off, mathematics is a Greek word, not African. It means learning. Chemistry has nothing to do with the word Khemet, and Khemet does not mean black. It means black land, you idiot. It refers to the soil around the Nile basin. Why would anyone name a nation after a skin colour?
@Cainus44 You don’t read good do you? I know my English is not all to good. But I highly suggest you work on your reading comprehension or pay attention more. I clearly quoted the J.P Widney quotes name of the book and the page of the book. If you go back and read you will clearly see it. So your self righteous tone of me not being able to offer any evidence is due to your lack of processing information given to you. I recommended you work on that before entering a debut
@Cainus44 lol, I will engage in convo with by asking question. what fake quote did I make? Have you actually read page 238 in life of an arayn volume two? If so what does it say?
@youngcatlaflare Oh any of your quotes could well be fake. That's the thing with known liars like yourself. I'll be quite frank with you though. I don't particularly care about their authenticity or your credibility. What I do care about is the fact that you go around collecting all these worthless quotes from outdated, incorrect, and racist books so you can throw them out in arguments, acting like something you read is the word of the gods and you don't have to go further.
This has been flagged as spam show
the basques(atlanteans) are the original europeans n the origin of the white race,the catalans are blood brothers of the basques.The atlanteans(basques) colonized the world n schooled humanity but the cheatin romans greeks etc concealed this.The atlanteans schooled their asses n the disgustin romans n greeks thanked the atlanteans by turnin on the atlanteans n have u believe the atlanteans n atlantis didnt even exist..wtf?unmask these sons of a bitch
MiamiDolphinsClyde10 1 week ago
WOW, THIS IS REALLY INTERESTING.. I AM GLAD I AM NOT DEPENDING ON YOUTUBE TO KNOW THAT WHITE PEOPLE ARE JUST LIKE BLACKS, SOME DUMB APPLES IN EVERY BUNCH.
sanzibar76 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
White People should know this! "The origin of human races" watch?v=X8IfTa1QDvQ
SLAVroots 1 month ago
Summerians or Mesopotamia where not white skin people they where like Arab or muslims today which are Brown Skin people that look like Saddam Hussein!
mike3000gt7 1 month ago 3
@mike3000gt7 thats considered white dumbass
brendanmichaelpix 2 days ago
this people where euroasian not white,this people where what you white people call sand niggers! you guys don't like arabs but this people where arabs!
777MexicanPride777 1 month ago
Ok so I see a bunch of pictures. This has not proved anything.
CMHippie 1 month ago
Bullshit
CMHippie 1 month ago
The statue of Gudea looks white-arabic or white-asian. and did you mean racial or facial? it's really annoying how absolutly everything keeps moving toward the screen.
serai7 1 month ago
Bunch of bull
OutsideTheRopes 1 month ago
@idasputum goy does not mean cattle, refer to the email i sent you or ask any jewish person if you can manage to pull your head out of your ass. oh yeh, go out this weekend and buy yourself some pussy, you sound like you need it bad.
sgtmasters 1 month ago
@IdaSputum, shut the fuck up. youre obviously mentally disturbed Goy means a non-jewish person and yes its sort of degoratory and no jews arent interested in killing non-jews so shut your stupid ass cock holster you call a mouth.
sgtmasters 1 month ago
@sgtmasters lol..cock holster!
gravityp28 1 month ago
@sgtmasters GOYIM mreans cattle you lying Zionist, and it isn't the Orthodox Jews that want to kill us - its the racial supremacist Zionists. -which in clude Christian Zionists like Bush, Muskum Zionists but Jewish Zionists have stolen USA,govt & hijacked the banks. NAZIS who want to make us all into Palestinians
IdaSputum 1 month ago
since white ppl run shit how come there not teaching ppl this bullshit..its too many loose ends
gravityp28 1 month ago
@gravityp28 BUT white people DONT RUN shit. ZIONISTS run shit Zionists see whites as a sub-species to be destroyed. Along with blacks
ALL NON-Zionists are termed "GOYIM" by Zionists. GOYIM means 'CATTLE'.
Its why the NDAA signed sneakily on New Year 2012 by Zionist Banker puppet Obama, while we were partying - MEANS USA is now OFFICIALLY A ZOO, worse than a jail as ALL RIGHTS removed.
Americans can now be hunted, jailed, NO charge, NO lawyer NO trial FOREVER & or killed
USA is run by ZIONAZIS
IdaSputum 1 month ago
@IdaSputum oohh so the zionists are purple!...the zionist have been shiting on black since slavery..now there sharing the love with low level whites its a big deal to shit on them ,but it is dnt get me wrong..my piont was how come the info of this video dats basically telln me these white civilizations came b4 the ancient egyptians or were better than them not mainstreamd on tv..but if dats the case why are they tryna stress that ancient egyptian were not ppl of color..
gravityp28 1 month ago
@gravityp28 Its a big deal to shit on anyone inc blacks shitting on albino blacks -- too many liars of every colour with ego problems who are determined to be the ones who came first - like it matters?. I'm white but i cant be bothered to view this actual vid. Its all bollocks. GOD alone knows
IM JUST SPAMMIN sites to alert people to SMASH the NDAA
Zionists want to kill all of us 'cattle'. 1 political party runs the world - NAZIon - they moved to USA
See my featured vid on it WOW
SMASH the NDAA
IdaSputum 1 month ago
@IdaSputum well ofcorse theres liar of every color ...i juss wana piont out the most odbvious ones in history..but they control history....
blacks shittin on albino blacks.... wat about hitler tryna kill all the jews and every black he saw along the way.. i didnt get yur piont...but yur right .GoD knows..nd soon light will reveal the real truths that these ppl you warn us of use against us..
gravityp28 1 month ago
@gravityp28 Hitler was a Rothschild child, - who knew? He was funded by Zionist Jews, - we didn't know because its the biggest con ever spun, & they run school curricula so we wouldnt catch on, they run media to keep the lie going.& they turned historical study of WW2 into a 'hate crime' & make innocent people do time. But you're right, LIGHT is coming to sterilise their shit
IdaSputum 1 month ago
@illuminatedgirl
The out of Africa theory has been disproven, there were plenty of "genetic hotspots" found throughout the world in India, Asia, Europe as well as Africa. Albinism is a gene, whites do not carry that gene, except those afflicted. We are not black people, that's ridiculous. From the moment humans walked the earth to the discovery of the earliest white remains was not enough time to evolve from negroid to caucasian.
LSKEJ88 1 month ago
Good stuff! There's no reason not to be proud of our white ancestors. I'm sure all the racist blacks have been hating on this video but let's not forget that the first documented slave masters were the Nubians and, wait for it---they were black!
LSKEJ88 1 month ago
@LSKEJ88 how cud you believe the ancestors of slave masters telln the ancestors of slaves thier ppl started slavery....so wat yur sayn is the nubians invented it..they were the fist to realize yu cud tie a muh fukka up then make him work 4 free..lmao..i wud say,the 1st ppl smart enuff 2 submit a person or tie a muhfukka up cud have possibly invented slavery..yur white..i guessin you shud be thinkng yur smarter than that..right? and u shud be proud of your white ancestor..but dont white wash mine
gravityp28 1 month ago
@LSKEJ88 you should be proud of accomplishments, not skin, which is arbitrary. and fyi, alot of this stuff is just plain made up
osiris6364 3 weeks ago
the neanderthal thing i have a friend that looks like a neanderthal if scientist saw him they would think he were the missing link and by the way hes white. And native americans that are genetically tested thoroughbreds have been known to have blue eyes seen it myself Oh did you know the first pharaoh of Egypt was dna tested and they believe hes from either Ireland northern France or from somewhere up that away not trying to fuel your racism though.
redmagician1000 2 months ago
White people's ancestor - are those Indian appearance, White skin and black hair Europeans.
You can look at the painting of Minoan, ancient Apollo statue, Sumerian, and the oldest Buddha statue in Afghanistan, they are the same race, same civilization before the Great Flood..
Onaivara 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MsKittenz1 you are a brainwashed idiot
PalePharaoh 2 months ago
The world is only 6000 years old. The white race has existed in about 2,600 of those years. In Biblical times people lived a lot longer than we do.....remember Methusla lived over 900 years old. so when scientist find old bones of man the are dating them a lot older than they really are.
MsKittenz1 2 months ago
@MsKittenz1 Ever heard of radiometric dating? Maybe you should check in to it. It shows clearly that the earth is a lot older then 6000 years. Fossil evidence shows that man didn't live at the same time as the dinosaurs. Where did all the dinosaur bones come from? You are ignoring a whole host of science from many different disciplines if you think the earth is only 6000 years old...
shockwavecalgary 2 months ago
2012---Age of the Golden Race
illuminatedgirl 3 months ago
Black albinos=white people or black albinos. DNA doesn't lie.
White people are Really Black People that lack "MElanin" research DNA and Melanin.
illuminatedgirl 3 months ago
Maybe that's where "CLOTHES COMES FROM" if you lack "Melanin" you need to wear something , to protect your skin. Africans were always almost naked or almost naked. Maybe the more albino type person needed the clothes. Since the white/albino type humans ruled after a while they were like wear clothes. They made it law.
illuminatedgirl 3 months ago
Our DNA is like 99.9 alike as humans. Its just white people lack "Melanin"
White people=black albino.
Everyone is really black, some are just more albino.
illuminatedgirl 3 months ago
Right people moved ocassionally, every few thousand years something happends and people move, or ice ages occurr, and people are genocided.. It is wrong to assume the people in africa/egypt/india/china have allways been there and are responsible for everything there. As the evidence suggests (anthroplogic, statues, archaeological, historiographic, pictographic, etc..etc.. show, sumerians are 2m+ nordics, now they are smaller and less inteligent due to contamination of bloodlines..
iamjacobnz 3 months ago
The person who made this video is such dumbass. The swastika originated from india and spread through buddhism. Torcharian themselves adopted buddhism religion an than passed it to the chinese.
Torcharians were even slaves to many chinese dynasties, tibetan, mongol, turkic.
mongolANDtamerlane 4 months ago
@mongolANDtamerlane No, there are plenty of sawastica findings dated thousands of years before buddism. Just google it before calling people dumbass.
However, the neandertal heritage in all out-of-africa humans are pretty established today, but this vid may predate recent important geneology findings.
AngeCord 3 months ago
@AngeCord And they all originated from india first. The oldest swastika originated from india, and the spread of swastika to other countries is because of Buddhism, all scholars and historian agree with this.
mongolANDtamerlane 3 months ago
@mongolANDtamerlane Buddhism came about 450 BC. There are plenty of swasticas findings outside india that are a lot elder than that. Why don't you spend 5 minutes on the internet to find out if you are wrong before posting?
AngeCord 3 months ago
@AngeCord Why don't show me proof is instead of talking so much. Like where? because all historians agree that the oldest swastika originated from India, and most of the spread of this sign happened from Buddhism and adopted from India. And european swastika was spread by the iranians. it's well documented the iranian population adopted the sign from India. Torcharians adopted it from the indians through buddhism when Torcharian were still under the rule of Han Dynasty and Xiongnu.
mongolANDtamerlane 3 months ago
@mongolANDtamerlane Instruction for idiots: Type 'swastica' in Google. Press search. Read top results. Remember that buddhism is less than 2500 years old.
Just to be clear: I'm not arguing that the swastica spread out of India, it's just that it spread to other regions earlier than buddhism.
AngeCord 3 months ago
@AngeCord
Instruction for dumb fucks: Type 'swastica' in Google. Press search. Click on wikipedia. Remember the POINT is that swastica originated from India and spread mostly through buddhism.
Just to be clear AGAIN: I'm not saying swastica all around the world happened because of Buddhism but it happened MOSTLY because of Buddhism, like the torcharians and iranians such as the Kushans who documented that they adopted the religion.
mongolANDtamerlane 3 months ago
@mongolANDtamerlane I fail to see how this is the case when the swasticka is really old, they even found one that is over 12,000+ years old (last ice age), now it gets alot harder to find things during the last ice age due to flooding, so whilst it is probably much, much older than that, we can not tell how much older at the moment... Just do a google search.. It did not originate in india as popularly believed...
iamjacobnz 3 months ago
@iamjacobnz
I'm not in a mood to listen to your fairy tale, it's well known by all scholars even by european scholars that it originated in India. The meaning of swastika symbol also originated from India, and was spread by Buddhism. The term aryan also originated from India, which means noble. The one you claim that is found 12,000+ years old is coincidental, there many other signs and symbols that appear similar to each other but are not related, It's just coincidence.
mongolANDtamerlane 3 months ago
@mongolANDtamerlane i just looked up the swastika and it ineed said that the earliest finding of the swastika was found in the indus valley civilization of ancient india
youngbubz05 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AngeCord i just looked up the swastika and it ineed said that the earliest finding of the swastika was found in the indus valley civilization of ancient india
youngbubz05 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
mongolANDtamerlane 4 months ago
@ChineseHOME1 hey fucktard, nothing is such as "IN BETWEEN DNA."
Just look at the obvious, both Black people and white people has bigger skulls, more masculines, and taller people in general, so their is no chance that a black with white couple would have a Asian siblings.
joeyboijr 4 months ago
Comment removed
exupipus 4 months ago
Woops I forgot albinos have pink eyes.
buckwats 4 months ago
Blue eyes are not a caucasian exlusive feature, its a recesive trait found sometimes even in mongolia and rarely in africa. It's not exclusive to just albinos in africa either, sometimes in blacks but rare. That's my only nitpick with the video.
buckwats 4 months ago
@buckwats your wrong..
frenchhy 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lmao @ this foolishness...dont be fooled white people, you have done great things, just not all these things
osiris6364 5 months ago
lmao @ this foolishness...dont be fooled white people, you have done great things, just not all these things
osiris6364 5 months ago
@osiris6364 Go away Afro-centric black racist, we don't need Blacks coming on videos about White history trying to tell us what our history is and isn't.
buffyjosmom 4 weeks ago
@buffyjosmom theres no such thing as black history and white history, just history...and this aint it
osiris6364 3 weeks ago
@osiris6364 How about the truth of history
dudley1957 3 weeks ago
lol still trying to still history smh you've only been on the planet for 6,000 plus years, many blacks are made to have different feature they dont just have wide noses they come in varius shapes and sizes, stop it, just stop it. Just like dinosours were made up to decieve the people some of this is made up, not all but some.
aivscp03 5 months ago
@aivscp03 Sorry but we don't need Afro-Centric black racists coming on our videos about our history trying to tell us what our history is and isn't. We've been here alot longer than 6,000 years racist boy.
buffyjosmom 4 weeks ago
According to the Bible, Torah, Koran, whichever one you choose, Mesopotamia aka Babylon was built by a black Cushite Hamite named Nimrod. " God is not a man that he should lie."
Shortyjored88 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Cont.. hopelessly incapable of acquiring the knowledge requisite to progress. It was southern colored peoples everywhere, in China, in Central America, in India, Mesopotamia, Syria, Egypt and Crete who gave the northern white peoples civilization
TheJones1957 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Quotes from Bishop William Montgomery Brown: "For the first two or three thousand years of civilization, there was not a civilized white man on the earth. Civilization was founded and developed by the swarthy races of Mesopotamia, Syria and Egypt, and the white race remained so barbaric that in those days an Egyptian or a Babylonian priest would have said that the riffraff of white tribes a few hundred miles to the north of their civilization were
TheJones1957 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Skeletons of the Mediterranean type have been found throughout Middle Africa, Southwest Asia, Mesopotamia, Indo-Pakistan, Central Asia and China. It is no secret that the founders of ancient Egypt, Elam, Sumer and the Indus Valley were all of the Mediterranean type. These Mediterranean people called themselves: KUSHITES
TheJones1957 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
To make the Sumerians “white”, the textbooks print pictures of artifacts dating to the Gutian rule of Lagash, to pass them off as the true originators of Sumerian civilization. No Gutian rulers of Lagash are recognized in the Sumerian King List
For example, Francois Lenormant (1837-1883) made it clear, following the research of Rawlinson, that the Elamite and Sumerians spoke genetically related languages
TheJones1957 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In Rawlinson’s day the (agglutinative Turanian speaking) Sumerian people were recognized as Akkadian or Chaldean, while the Semitic speaking blacks were called Assyrians. the problem lies with latecomer to the research (Julius Oppert (1825-1905). Oppert was a German born of Jewish parents
TheJones1957 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The father of assyriology(HENRY RAWLINSON) put this issue to rest if you study futher, Rawlinson was surprised during his research to discover that the founders of the Mesopotamian civilization were of Kushite (Cushite) origin. He made it clear that the Semitic speakers of Akkad and the non-Semitic speakers of Sumer were both Black or Negro people who called themselves sag-gig-ga “Black Heads
TheJones1957 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sumerian God, Bull Man’s Head 2500BC
Research: Babylonian and Oriental Record C.B. Rawlinson
Reserach:The case for black Mesopotamians
Research: The Amorite Invasion
TheJones1957 5 months ago
To make the Sumerians “white” textbooks print pictures of artifacts dating to the Gutian rule of Lagash, to pass them off as the true originators of Sumerian civilization. No Gutian rulers of Lagash are recognized in the Sumerian King List.
TheJones1957 5 months ago
@TheJones1957 Take your Afro-Centric, black racist white people hating black supremacist butt back to your Afro-Centric videos. We whites do not need you blacks trying to tell us what our history is & is not.
buffyjosmom 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sumerian God, Bull Man’s Head 2500BC
Research: Babylonian and Oriental Record C.B. Rawlinson
Reserach:The case for black Mesopotamians
Research: The Amorite Invasion
dudley1957 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
For Oppert to have debated this issue with Rawlinson, who deciphered the cuneiform script, would have meant that he would have had to accept the fact that Semites were Black. There was no way Oppert would have wanted to acknowledge his African heritage, given the Anti-Semitism experienced by Jews living in Europe
dudley1957 6 months ago
It is strange to some observers that Oppert never criticized Rawlinson who had proposed the Turanian origin of the Ki-en-gi (Sumerians, Kangars). But this was not strange at all. Oppert did not attack Rawlinson who was still alive at the time because he knew that Rawlinson said the Sumerians were the original Scythic and Turanian people he called Kushites. Moreover, Rawlinson made it clear that both the Akkadians and Sumerians were Blacks
dudley1957 6 months ago
The study of the Sumerians, Akkadians. Assyrians and Elamites began with the decipherment of the cuneiform script by Henry Rawlinson
dudley1957 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In Rawlinson’s day the (agglutinative Turanian speaking) Sumerian people were recognized as Akkadian or Chaldean, while the Semitic speaking blacks were called Assyrians. the problem lies with latecomer to the research (Julius Oppert (1825-1905). Oppert was a German born of Jewish parents
dudley1957 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The father of assyriology(HENRY RAWLINSON) put this issue to rest if you study futher, Rawlinson was surprised during his research to discover that the founders of the Mesopotamian civilization were of Kushite (Cushite) origin. He made it clear that the Semitic speakers of Akkad and the non-Semitic speakers of Sumer were both Black or Negro people who called themselves sag-gig-ga “Black Heads
dudley1957 6 months ago
Again , Africans came into Middle East and settled. They came as immigrant groups like the Kushites, the Egyptians, the Punitians/Phoenicians (People of Punt). They blended together and became the later Black Israelites, the Black Syrians and Canaanites) They established themselves in the land and built many amazing cultures and civilizations. The builders of these civilizations maintained very close trade and cultural linkages with their African motherland
dudley1957 6 months ago
@dudley1957 Take your Afro-Centric white people hating black racist black supremacist butt on back to your Afro-Centric videos & stay off of White vidoes. Whites don't need you coming on our videos about our history telling us what our history is and isn't.
buffyjosmom 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
To make the Sumerians “white”, the textbooks print pictures of artifacts dating to the Gutian rule of Lagash, to pass them off as the true originators of Sumerian civilization. No Gutian rulers of Lagash are recognized in the Sumerian King List
For example, Francois Lenormant (1837-1883) made it clear, following the research of Rawlinson, that the Elamite and Sumerians spoke genetically related languages
dudley1957 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Controversy surrounding the Kushite/African/Black origins of the Elamites, Sumerians, Akkadians and “Assyrians” is simple and yet complicated. It involves both the racism exhibited toward the African slaves in the Western Hemisphere and Africans generally which led to the idea that Africans had no history; and the need of Julius Oppert to make Semites white, to accommodate the “white” ancestry of European Jews
dudley1957 6 months ago
Slow your role, I have never stated, in any of my comments. One race was better than other. Never...... Also, I never communicated on the topics of USA, Black Presidents and that kind of stuff. One race.......if that was the case, we would not be having this conversation. I am not the preachy guy.......
TheJones1957 6 months ago
white people my ass white people were vikings who had red/yellow/brown hair
HanDynasty26349 6 months ago
The Eurpoean who has no melanin is the LAST race. All peoples on the PLANET were dark skin. Civilizations were already here before. The Myans, Aztecs, Nubians, Egyptians, Persians, Asians, these people outdate the European B and everything he knows he learned and Begin to plagerize early on as his own. His Zodiak was already created by the Africans, Aztecs, Mayans etc. The minority who has no culture wants to control the majority that gave him his culture
TheJones1957 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This early result has been confirmed by two additional genetic studies of Neanderthal remains from different parts of Europe, showing that the Neanderthals were closely related to each other, but very distantly related to us. The genetic data is incontrovertible - modern Europeans trace their recent ancestry to Africa, in common with everyone else in the world
TheJones1957 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheJones1957 This early result has been confirmed by two additional genetic studies of Neanderthal remains from different parts of Europe, showing that the Neanderthals were closely related to each other, but very distantly related to us. The genetic data is incontrovertible - modern Europeans trace their recent ancestry to Africa, in common with everyone else in the world
dudley1957 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Of the thousands of human mitochondrial sequences have been obtained from people all over the world, not one is anywhere near as divergent as Krings' Neanderthal sequence. Neanderthals fall well outside the range of genetic variation found in the human species - and therefore they represent a separate species
TheJones1957 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheJones1957 Of the thousands of human mitochondrial sequences have been obtained from people all over the world, not one is anywhere near as divergent as Krings' Neanderthal sequence. Neanderthals fall well outside the range of genetic variation found in the human species - and therefore they represent a separate species
dudley1957 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This date means that the man who gave rise to the vast majority of western Europeans lived around 30,000 years ago - consistent with a recent African diaspora, and again showing that Neanderthals could not have been direct ancestors of modern Europeans
TheJones1957 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheJones1957 This date means that the man who gave rise to the vast majority of western Europeans lived around 30,000 years ago - consistent with a recent African diaspora, and again showing that Neanderthals could not have been direct ancestors of modern Europeans
dudley1957 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Caucasians did NOT evolve from Cro-Magnons in Europe. It is a common misconception that Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon were the forerunners of Modern Man. Actually Modern Man is much older than both of them.date for the origin of M173 is around 30,000 years ago
TheJones1957 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheJones1957 Caucasians did NOT evolve from Cro-Magnons in Europe. It is a common misconception that Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon were the forerunners of Modern Man. Actually Modern Man is much older than both of them.date for the origin of M173 is around 30,000 years ago
dudley1957 3 weeks ago
Caucasians (Whites), and Mongols (Chinese), as sub-sets of the Black race: they lack the genetic diversity of the Black race, and as such; they carry only a few of the phenotypes of the Black race
White" haplogroups; like R1 and R2, are instead, indisputably "Black" haplogroups. As always; all roads lead "Back" to the Black man
Modern White European Y-DNA which clearly shows that there is NO uniquely "White" haplogroups; but rather, all White DNA is derived from Black haplogroups
TheJones1957 6 months ago
@TheJones1957 hey preachy guy, exactly white people evolved from black people and black people are still black people which according to our theory of evolution means that the white man is the next step in our evolution...
This whole race thing of white people are better and black people are better because of this and that is retarded, we are all people with different colour skin. BUT we are still people. One race.
Speaking of culture taking culture, USA, black president, stfu.
shawzie1916 6 months ago
Throughout the video you use the term "white". Were any of these people really white in the modern US sense? Would a Sumerian be considered white in modern US society or would they be considered "middle eastern"? Caucasoid, yes, but white? It seem a little dishonest IMO
LigaFantasma 7 months ago
@LigaFantasma None, of the above. The ancient sumerians were not Caucasids, they were Negroids.
TheJones1957 7 months ago
@TheJones1957 Sumerians depicted themselves as blue eyed which in your theory of Negroids is not a black trait. Im giving a 8/10 but still calling troll
shawzie1916 6 months ago
It was thought that Neanderthals anatomic adaptations to cold had brought about a lightning of the skin, and thus played a part in the evolution of White people. But scientific studies indicate that modern White people, show no genetic evidence of admixture with Neanderthals. It now appears that their evolution was much simpler and more direct The ancient sumerians were not Caucasids, they were Negroids.
TheJones1957 7 months ago
@TheJones1957 Wrong. The only ones who do not have Neanderthal DNA are Africans/Negroids. There was a scientific article about this not too long ago. Europeans are about 2% Neanderthal. Also Ancient Sumerians were not Negroid they were Proto Indo European thus Caucasoid. Many European languages today have comparable roots.
StandbyEurope 6 months ago
@TheJones1957 You need to do more research dude, it has in fact came out that all NON-Africans have at least 1-4 % Neanderthal DNA on both the Male & Female line LOL.
buffyjosmom 4 weeks ago
@buffyjosmom White Lie............ The Ancient people of Europe was the San Bush man type. 45,000 B.C. The Great Glacial Ice Sheets that covered most of Europe started to melt and a group, or groups, of these Khoisan type peoples walked across the Gibraltar straits and entered Europe.
TheJones1957 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheJones1957 It was thought that Neanderthals anatomic adaptations to cold had brought about a lightning of the skin, and thus played a part in the evolution of White people. But scientific studies indicate that modern White people, show no genetic evidence of admixture with Neanderthals. It now appears that their evolution was much simpler and more direct
dudley1957 3 weeks ago
Take pride.
Let the truth be known
God bless
Frankie3112Nld 8 months ago
I'm not sure if the Neanderthal connection is a bad thing since it's been discovered that it wasn't a lumbering dolt. Neanderthal possessed a 20% larger cranial capacity than modern man. It wasn't very athletic either, thus it had to rely on its wits.
unclecrackerhead 8 months ago
@unclecrackerhead
The typical Neanderthal was an athlete of the kind of weight lifters or of the heavy weight wrestlers. Maybe was not fast running, but certainly was a very strong.
powerdriller10 6 months ago
Comment removed
DrDeso1 6 months ago
@powerdriller10 but they couldn't compete with the cro-magnons intellectually, so they were overwhelmed by them
DrDeso1 6 months ago
@ricciuto1 Very true
DarkShadowM99 8 months ago
@Ozzrya91 EAT WELL MY FRIEND.... YOUR ABOUT TO BE PUT ON A FORCED DIET OF THE WORST KIND!
papadoc2k4 10 months ago
@Ozzrya91 I like to see any kind of proof...
thatswhatisaidyeah 10 months ago
@Ozzrya91 White people, and Europeans are not automatically the same thing. If there are 30+ thousand year old remains found in Europe, it's not a white person, cause there is no such thing as a 30+ thousand year old white person. The white race is 6,000 to 10,000 years old...
thatswhatisaidyeah 10 months ago
@thatswhatisaidyeah this is yahwistic and afro semitic occult bullshit
VendPrekmurec 10 months ago
Nice music but you've been proven wrong about Neanderthal man, i suspect Neanderthal mixed with the surrounding races and became the cro-magnons, a direct transition 500,000 years of culture, and yes Neanderthals where white, modern Europeans inherited the Caucasian appearance from Neanderthal.
spindlegrinder 1 year ago 5
@spindlegrinder Appreciate your comment. This video was made before that fact was known. Also, the many anti-whites of the world use the neanderthal connection as some sort of weapon to act like the white race were animals, when in fact, they come from the same ancestral lineage. I'm quite aware that I was wrong as far as that part of the vid goes, simply because these scientific facts were not available to the public yet. But, that doesn't help their argument much...so I'm fine with it. Cheers.
lucidmindful 11 months ago 4
@lucidmindful You could remake the video, you did a good job the first time, Neanderthals where more highly advanced than they've been given credit for and where around long before cro-magnon man was, I suspect history is as it always has been and that is that Europeans where more advanced from the beginning
even though that idea is not politically correct it is true
spindlegrinder 11 months ago
@spindlegrinder There's not enough Neanderthal DNA in Europeans to support that theory.
LigaFantasma 7 months ago
Ain't no way in the hell, if you use real anthrology, can you trace the white man (as a people) any further than 10,000 years ago tops. White people come from black people. Period. The white race is a new race. Anything else is bullshit.....
thatswhatisaidyeah 1 year ago
@thatswhatisaidyeah There is a theory that I read lately that says that 10,000 years ago all the people of the earth were dark skinned until a genetic mutation emerged where some people developed lighter skin. Maybe you read the same theory but I think you missed the part that said skin color is only one characteristic of race. The theory says that all people were dark skinned, not that all people were negro.
rooster26730 1 year ago
@rooster26730 What is a negro?
thatswhatisaidyeah 1 year ago
@thatswhatisaidyeah a negro is a member of the negroid race, a race distinguished not merely by the color of their skin. For instance an Indian(subcontinent) may have dark skin but is not negro. It wasn't until the late 1800s that three races of man were catagorized. Prior to that time any dark skinned person was properly called a negro. All of the races have distinctly unique DNA but are all of the same species.
rooster26730 1 year ago
@rooster26730 Well wouldn't you agree that the negroid race has dominate over recessive genes and more genetic makeup than any of the races?
thatswhatisaidyeah 1 year ago
@thatswhatisaidyeah I'm sorry but I don't understand what you are asking. Can you rephrase your question?
rooster26730 1 year ago
@rooster26730 EVERY SINGLE PERSONS DNA IS UNIQUE! GET THAT STR8!
papadoc2k4 10 months ago
@papadoc2k4 Yeah and what's your point?
rooster26730 10 months ago
@rooster26730 SAME AS YOURS!
papadoc2k4 10 months ago
@thatswhatisaidyeah yes, we evolved.
SuperJat78 11 months ago
@SuperJat78 The correct term is "devolved". Black humans were on the planet first, so Black people evolved. Since whites are extracted from blacks, they are devolved. Devolved people were given dominion over the world, so you have a hellish crap world now. That's how it goes...
thatswhatisaidyeah 11 months ago
@thatswhatisaidyeah caucasians aren't all white. The theory goes that about 10,000 years ago all caucasians were dark just like the Arabs and Indians. All the mongoloids were dark skinned as well and although these other two races were dark skinned they were not negroid. Lack of malanin is believed to be a biological adaptation in order to better absorb vitamin D in regions with long winters and less exposure to sunlight.
rooster26730 10 months ago
@rooster26730 If lack of sunlight over time makes you white, then why aren't Eskimo's white? They have been there for at least 10,000 years...
thatswhatisaidyeah 10 months ago
@thatswhatisaidyeah First of all I didn't say that lack of sunlight makes you white. I said the lack of melanin was a biological adaptation for absorbing vitamin D in a climate that has limited sunlight. That doesn't mean that just because one group develops that adaptation that all other groups in the same region will develop it as well. Look at some pictures of eskimos. Some have very light skin which is the same adaptation caucasians made.
rooster26730 10 months ago
@rooster26730 I see where you are going with your question. If white people do trace their anscestry back to Africa that doesn't mean they evolved from negros. Skin color is only one characteristic of race and it is misleading to think all caucasians are "white" Indians and Arabs are also caucasian even if they are as black as negros.
rooster26730 10 months ago
@thatswhatisaidyeah They are light, but they ain't white. A white man has his own genetics. I just don't think climate turns a black man, into a white man. Dark and light differences in skin tone, yes. An albino black person has a lack of melanin, but it's still a black person. There is more to being a member of the white race, than just lack of melanin. I believe whites as a race, were made by interbreeding, or selective breeding within a group of earlier people.
thatswhatisaidyeah 10 months ago
@thatswhatisaidyeah You got shit for brains. As I said before I didn't say lack of sunlight makes you white as you claimed as I said. I said that lack of melanin is a biological adaptation to absorb vitamin D in regions with less sunlight. Caucasians adapted to this as well as eskimos and other groups. It isn't a disease.
rooster26730 10 months ago
@rooster26730 Damn, you got a little pissy there. Ok fine, maybe light skin helps absorb vitamin A in the whole climate thing. One of the questions was, where do white people come from? Not why white people have a lack of melanin. I think they are bred. A particular bred breed of human. That's all. Didn't say it was a disease...
thatswhatisaidyeah 10 months ago
@thatswhatisaidyeah "I believe whites as a race, were made by interbreeding, or selective breeding within a group of earlier people. "
There is no Archeological, Darwinian proof, 1 single trace of your claim.There was no evolution of any race from other; black race did not evolve from some "Lucy", yellow race did not evolve from African, white did not evolve from black, red or african... also; you have interbreeding in India, Mesopotamia and no race was evolved from this mixture..they are brown
VendPrekmurec 10 months ago
@thatswhatisaidyeah the origin of all human great races; white, black, red, yellow is well described in Vedas... All came from outside (before they've started to mix - in cca 55 000 Bc)
VendPrekmurec 10 months ago
@VendPrekmurec Don't care what "Vedas" says. Huiman races did not all appear at the same time. That is unscientific, and fantasy. Lighter races are newer races (generally)....
thatswhatisaidyeah 10 months ago
@thatswhatisaidyeah no... darwinism is unscientific (based on torah & bible)
VendPrekmurec 10 months ago
@VendPrekmurec Neither the torah or bible are based on Science, unlike Darwinism which actually is.
rooster26730 10 months ago
@rooster26730 every dr. of biology knows that so called "Darwinian theory" is just a theory and more or less belief - there is no indirect link between so called Homo Erectus - Lucy - Homo Sapien evolution... there is even bigger gap between white race, yellow, red and black race... without any traces of evolution, albinism, and other physiological changes. That's why Darwinian theory is so attacked by Creationists.But in fact their theories - both Creationist and Darwinian are based on Bible &
VendPrekmurec 10 months ago
@VendPrekmurec The word theory is commonly misunderstood in Science. Most people use the word theory when they should use the word hypothesis IE there's a lot of gas in my oil, my theory is that my fuel pump is broken. This is not how Science uses the word. A theory, when used by Scientists, is an explanation reached that most Scientists agree on after the evidence has been examined.
rooster26730 10 months ago
@rooster26730 hypothesis without any proofs is a theory for me... :)
Creationism is also a theory...
the approximation to the point of "proof"... but there is not proof, because there is no evidence, only a belief...
and big gap between (of any evolution of Homo Sapiens out of "Homo Erectus" and Lucy link - ancestry )
VendPrekmurec 10 months ago
@VendPrekmurec "hypothesis without any proofs is a theory for me" Well a hypothesis is a hypotheis and your opinion is not a qualifier for it to be one. The Theory of Evolution is backed up by overwhelming evidence. It isn't necessary to produce a missing link. The evidence is substantial without it. I don't understand how you can claim that Darwinian Theory is based on the Bible.
rooster26730 10 months ago
@rooster26730 Sumerian myths... of Adapas / Adamas / Adam. Creationists believe that 1. human was Adam (Adapa ; in Sumeria as half human, half non human - saurian - serpent - "image of god" - the "created one " (clone) - manipulation with human DNA) as well Darwinists believe that 1. human was Adam (they seek his "ancestry" (over Lucy). But believe me, they will never find it. Why? Because there was no "1. human" on this planet, no evolution of any race from sub humans... All came from OUTSIDE
VendPrekmurec 10 months ago
@rooster26730 many archeologists know about human artifacts found bellow 70 m of coal layer... Many people know about Antediluvian civilizations... but science & bible does not allow them to speak about it. They will be attacked immediately by "scholars" and "academics" and creationists... many people lost their jobs because they believed - into "forbidden archeology".
VendPrekmurec 10 months ago
@rooster26730 Russia was a mother land of white race - they all came there after Great Ice Age (cca 110 000 BC). This migration from Hyperborea was called "Paska or Pashet" (in old Slavic - from which was derived Sanskrit) means "PASSover"... or also called "Great night", "Uskrs" (krsnuti - "to enliven" - compare with "Hindu" Krishna - which comes from old Slavic "pagan" god Krst-na ("twice born one, incarnated god, ressurected one") - the word was derived into Egypt and later into "Christ"
VendPrekmurec 10 months ago
@rooster26730 with other words; "Easter" as "Christian" tradition predates Christianity - and has roots in Slavic Vedism ("paganism" - as a mockery)... the original word from North pole (of all white race) was called Paska (it is NOT a hebrew word for "exodus" ! )
so happy Easter everyone
VendPrekmurec 10 months ago
@thatswhatisaidyeah light skin is a newer adaptation not a new race. If you were to take a group of Indians(they are caucasian) who developed light skin they would not be a new race, merely the same race with a new characteristic. Imagine if a group of negroids developed white skin. They would not be "white" they would still be negroid but with light skin.btw I don't care what the vedas say either.
rooster26730 10 months ago
@rooster26730 Well, this convo is over, now you're just being redundant. Already went over that stuff...
thatswhatisaidyeah 10 months ago
@thatswhatisaidyeah so in other words you can't follow up with a logical argument.
rooster26730 10 months ago
@rooster26730 There's nothing to follow up with buddy. We already went over light skin and climate connection. We already went over how I think white people and indians and other grafted people got here. And black people without melanin (like albino) are still black. White people are a race of people, that are not black people with no melanin. What the hell do you want me to say? Just read over the exchange, and have a nice life...
thatswhatisaidyeah 10 months ago
@thatswhatisaidyeah I already have a nice life but thanks anyway. You're an ignorant racist with poor logic and no insight. I think we both know I'm not your buddy and if you really don't have anything else to say then just stfu. You don't have to respond to me but if I see you write something ignorant and racist I'll be sure to comment on it.
rooster26730 10 months ago
Comment removed
VendPrekmurec 10 months ago
You clearly do no research an matter you argue about. As You just goggled my jp widney quote and you received Dubois book were he quotes JP widney. I retraced your steps and find your methods to be inadequate
Another thing chemistry has everything to do with the word khemet, as it was moors/arabs/blacks who taught the euros chemstry in which you translated the word alchemy which comes from arabic whom got it from khemet.Yes khemet means black soil, never said it did not
youngcatlaflare 1 year ago
@youngcatlaflare You said Khemet means black. Your exact words. Blacks taught Europeans absolutely nothing. Alchemy, chemistry's precursor, existed in Europe before Arabs and Moors had anything similar to it. Chemistry was a completely European invention.
Cainus44 1 year ago
I will quote from the race life of the arayn volum 2 page 238 again for your conivent since you do not research but google."Back in centuries which are scarcely historic where history gives indeed only vague hintings are traces of a widespread primitive civilization,crude,imperfect,garish,barbaric yet ruling the world of that age from its seats of power in the valleys of the ganges and the euphrates and the nile and it was of the black race.The first babylon seems to have been built by a negro
youngcatlaflare 1 year ago
@youngcatlaflare Keep quoting things, not one bit of it is true, from a reliable source, up to date, or remotely relevant. I told you before, I don't trust your quotes. You're a liar in denial.
Cainus44 1 year ago
LOL TA-Seti does not exist, bro i will continoul bombarad you with quotes and historical evidence all. But before we get to that. Please explain your reluctant and out right denial that blacks were the founders of all things, from mathmatics which comes from maat an afrikan deity, or chemstiry which comes from khemt(black),language etc?
youngcatlaflare 1 year ago
@youngcatlaflare It's only denial if what I was denying was not true. First off, mathematics is a Greek word, not African. It means learning. Chemistry has nothing to do with the word Khemet, and Khemet does not mean black. It means black land, you idiot. It refers to the soil around the Nile basin. Why would anyone name a nation after a skin colour?
Cainus44 1 year ago
@youngcatlaflare The origin of spoken language is unknown. The origin of written language is Sumerian (Mesopotamian).
Ta-Seti does not exist. There is not one shred of authentic evidence suggesting it is more than myth. Even if it did exist, it does not predate Sumer.
Cainus44 1 year ago
@Cainus44 You don’t read good do you? I know my English is not all to good. But I highly suggest you work on your reading comprehension or pay attention more. I clearly quoted the J.P Widney quotes name of the book and the page of the book. If you go back and read you will clearly see it. So your self righteous tone of me not being able to offer any evidence is due to your lack of processing information given to you. I recommended you work on that before entering a debut
youngcatlaflare 1 year ago
@youngcatlaflare I don't care what excuses you make. You came up with a fake quote, and I called you out on it. You're in denial at this point.
Cainus44 1 year ago
@Cainus44 lol, I will engage in convo with by asking question. what fake quote did I make? Have you actually read page 238 in life of an arayn volume two? If so what does it say?
youngcatlaflare 1 year ago
@youngcatlaflare Oh any of your quotes could well be fake. That's the thing with known liars like yourself. I'll be quite frank with you though. I don't particularly care about their authenticity or your credibility. What I do care about is the fact that you go around collecting all these worthless quotes from outdated, incorrect, and racist books so you can throw them out in arguments, acting like something you read is the word of the gods and you don't have to go further.
Cainus44 1 year ago
@Cainus44 hehehe again have you read page 238 of JPs book Race Life of the Aryan Peoples Volumes 2?
youngcatlaflare 1 year ago