Fischer vs Spassky, 1992 ,Blundering out of the book

[Danielinrodriguez]

por que se rindio¿?

[ItzoSpain]

@xocful advice, do not waste your time watching my videos, put in the search funny, accident, joke, and so on. but not chess. you have no idea of chess!

[FJRodriguezMD]

Fischer was white?

[mukmin01]

@FJRodriguezMD if you want to know which is white, see the title. The name comes 1st should be playing white.

[farerse]

POST THE END'S

[ezekieloak]

I think [4...]d7xc6 is where Boris over-extended his defense.

Is [4...]b7xc6 a safer response?

[paradoxicus]

Aceptar el caballo en la Ruy Lopez con enroque contrario y el rey negro en c-6,contribuye poderosamente a perder la partida.

Spassky,aqui,nada fino.Simplemente Fischer no perdona.

[Deader123456789]

2 questions who won the game, and why is this vid at 1,23 at the end , did the black player give up??

[pkrkid42]

@Deader123456789 black resigns because of impending checkmate. king retreats, rook to a7 and the game is over.

[1fantoontown]

@Deader123456789 bobby fisher gave up because spassky traped his rook 

[ItzoSpain]

@Deader123456789 Spassky resigned . It is clearly a losing position for Black , after Nb4+ Kc7 , Ra7+ Bb7? , Rxb7 Kxb7 , Nd6+ Kc6 , Nf7 winning the black rook and the game ...

[hthought]

@ItzoSpain Is worth to note that after Nf7 is winning the black rook, black tries to trap the knight by Nh6. White has to take the knight with the bishop. If not, follows g5! White is still easily win, but his position is worsened.

[lroberts2478]

Can anybody tell me why Fischer moved his knight from c3 to e4??

[dartplayer170]

@lroberts2478 the threat is Bxc5, bxc5, Nxc5 forking the king and bishop.....winning a pawn

[Alexon88]

@lroberts2478 to limit king

[shadowdancerRFW]

black overextended himself on queen side. risky play, and the end was pretty obvious, especially if white was someone as fischer.

[ezekieloak]

@shadowdancerRFW I agree. Black's h7 pawn is sitting there the whole game!

[darkmoon123321]

moves these guys make to us might seem foolish but u have to realize they are seeing 5 moves into it .....

[Furansowakun]

1:09 king take knight, rook to e6, king can go to d7 right? Protecting bishop ... O_o

[lalotanno]

king cant take knight because its protected.

only can take with the pawn but if king go d7 then e4 c5 check

and withe capture the bishop

[joeltopgun]

king can't take the knight. protected by other knight.

[dartplayer170]

@Furansowakun but then Nxc6 winning pawn and forking king and bishop and if Kd5 protecting the bishop instead of Kd7 white plays Rd6+....looks like mating net.

[Sevjeolje]

1:09 why not capture night whit pawn for black ?

[lalotanno]

@Sevjeolje

porque le haria un jaque con la torre en

a6 y perderia el peon y un alfil por un caballo

saludos

[emv1031]

@lalotanno pero no es cierto que perderia el peon y un alfil pero seria por un caballo y una torreo no? Quedaria mucho mejor parado el negro me parece... p.d. no un super jugador ni nada asi que si suena tonto el comentario me disculpo jeje

[emv1031]

@lalotanno Pero en la eventualidad de que esa jugada se diera, al final de la "masacre" negro hubiera salido tomando una torre y un caballo, y blanco solo el peon y el alfil... no entiendo porque no hubiera sido una jugada valida. p.d. no soy jugador profesional ni nada, asi que si suena tonto el comentario me disculpo jeje

[emv1031]

@lalotanno Aaaaah no perdon que tonto.... es que hice pausa en el juego en el momento equivocado...pause antes de que el negro moviera el alfil, por eso no entendia... ok ahora si tiene sentido porque no comer el caballo... perdon!

[lalotanno]

@Sevjeolje

because rook in a6 check  and white capture the bishop on e6

[SeyseDK]

cause of rook a6 i spose.. it would lead into a deffinit mate

[TomBarristerX]

@Sevjeolje After 19 N(b3)xc5, if Black plays bxc5, then 20, Rxa6+ and Bb6 21. Bxc5, 20... Kd2, 21 Nxc5+ or 20... Kd5, Rd6+ each win a Bishop.

[eaglefan52]

great chess match guys