From 3:31 onwards the video admirably shows how insects are captured on video with multiple wingbeats showing on a single frame and the insect body appearing as a rod. This is a characteristic of how video cameras work and how with slow shutter speeds fast short objects appear as long extended rods
Skyfish were first documented by filmmaker José Escamilla, who discovered them by accident. In 1994, Escamilla had videotaped a "conventional" UFO near Midway, New Mexico. Fourteen days later, while seeking to photograph the UFO again, he instead captured a flying object that was not a vehicle of any kind. At first he thought it was just an insect or bird. When he examined the film frame by frame, however, it became clear that what he had captured on film was something unknown.
Later, more distinct images were captured while Escamilla was filming cliff jumpers at a deep cave in Mexico. When he developed the film, small flying things could be seen zipping around the divers at a high rate of speed - so fast that they weren't seen with the naked eye. They move through the air like insects or birds, sometimes darting around objects with a kind of animal intelligence - but at a speed far greater than any known insect or bird.
How fast? Analysis of film and video of skyfish from around the world indicate that they can be moving as fast as 150 to 1,000 miles per hour - faster than the speed of sound.
How big are they? The same analysis indicates that they might range in size from just a few inches to perhaps over a hundred feet in length! How could something that large be unknown? That's part of the skyfish mystery, yet there they are on video.
Although most skyfish have been seen in the air outdoors, they have also been photographed and videotaped indoors and even underwater. A photograph displayed on Kitty's Kitchen website appears to show a skyfish in mid-flight ready to pass through a doorway in her home. And a TV news report on Escamilla from KCOP Channel 13 includes clear footage of a skyfish swimming in a stream, indicating that they are equally at home in the water
It's hard to tell where the objects are sometimes. An insect closer to the camera looks like a high-speed plane, when in reality it's cruising along at only 10 mph. Try filming insects in your yard and watch the film back in slow motion. You will see what I mean. The faster the insect is flying, the longer it looks on film. This was proven already when they used a high-speed camera next to a normal camera. The normal camera showed a classic rod while the hi-speed camera showed a dragon fly.
FYI - I tried an experiment this summer in my backyard. I filmed an area where lots of small insects fly around our bushes and watched it back on film. Some insects fly so fast that they blurred across a single frame, looking longer than they really were. Their wings opened & closed in rhythm, and looked like a corkscrew on film. When they landed on a leaf you could see that they were nothing more than an insect. It's the same effect as a bullet captured on a slow-frame camera makes. Sorry.
I assume you're taking the piss except for your supersonic comments.
"Rods" are insects. Simple as that.
An insect sized object will unlikely be caught on film travelling at anywhere near 1000km'hr. Even at only 150km'hr at pal 25fps, that means images of the object will be at least 2 metres distant between each frame of video or film and would only register as a blurred rod except at v high shutter speed.
good riffing on guitar there buddy.
xacti216 3 years ago
rods are insects
not fucking ufos
0titleist0 3 years ago
Obviously they're not spaceships. they seem to be living creatures.
edstar83 3 years ago
Why are there video's showing these "insects" flying underwater? Insects can not do that..
SilentKombat 3 years ago
cool
widviewer 3 years ago
Man how are you getting all of these videos any how ?
zztwp 3 years ago
Ever here of Google?
wheelchairassassin 3 years ago
Interesting
SamohtStudios 3 years ago
these rods or insects whatever they are?? hasn't anyone managed to capture any yet in a net or something??
23h20ncb 3 years ago
From 3:31 onwards the video admirably shows how insects are captured on video with multiple wingbeats showing on a single frame and the insect body appearing as a rod. This is a characteristic of how video cameras work and how with slow shutter speeds fast short objects appear as long extended rods
Grommo 3 years ago
Skyfish were first documented by filmmaker José Escamilla, who discovered them by accident. In 1994, Escamilla had videotaped a "conventional" UFO near Midway, New Mexico. Fourteen days later, while seeking to photograph the UFO again, he instead captured a flying object that was not a vehicle of any kind. At first he thought it was just an insect or bird. When he examined the film frame by frame, however, it became clear that what he had captured on film was something unknown.
SilentKombat 3 years ago
Later, more distinct images were captured while Escamilla was filming cliff jumpers at a deep cave in Mexico. When he developed the film, small flying things could be seen zipping around the divers at a high rate of speed - so fast that they weren't seen with the naked eye. They move through the air like insects or birds, sometimes darting around objects with a kind of animal intelligence - but at a speed far greater than any known insect or bird.
SilentKombat 3 years ago
How fast? Analysis of film and video of skyfish from around the world indicate that they can be moving as fast as 150 to 1,000 miles per hour - faster than the speed of sound.
How big are they? The same analysis indicates that they might range in size from just a few inches to perhaps over a hundred feet in length! How could something that large be unknown? That's part of the skyfish mystery, yet there they are on video.
SilentKombat 3 years ago
Although most skyfish have been seen in the air outdoors, they have also been photographed and videotaped indoors and even underwater. A photograph displayed on Kitty's Kitchen website appears to show a skyfish in mid-flight ready to pass through a doorway in her home. And a TV news report on Escamilla from KCOP Channel 13 includes clear footage of a skyfish swimming in a stream, indicating that they are equally at home in the water
SilentKombat 3 years ago
/watch?v=amnNgXRK_vo
SilentKombat 3 years ago
It's hard to tell where the objects are sometimes. An insect closer to the camera looks like a high-speed plane, when in reality it's cruising along at only 10 mph. Try filming insects in your yard and watch the film back in slow motion. You will see what I mean. The faster the insect is flying, the longer it looks on film. This was proven already when they used a high-speed camera next to a normal camera. The normal camera showed a classic rod while the hi-speed camera showed a dragon fly.
JHatch65 2 years ago
FYI - I tried an experiment this summer in my backyard. I filmed an area where lots of small insects fly around our bushes and watched it back on film. Some insects fly so fast that they blurred across a single frame, looking longer than they really were. Their wings opened & closed in rhythm, and looked like a corkscrew on film. When they landed on a leaf you could see that they were nothing more than an insect. It's the same effect as a bullet captured on a slow-frame camera makes. Sorry.
JHatch65 2 years ago
I assume you're taking the piss except for your supersonic comments.
"Rods" are insects. Simple as that.
An insect sized object will unlikely be caught on film travelling at anywhere near 1000km'hr. Even at only 150km'hr at pal 25fps, that means images of the object will be at least 2 metres distant between each frame of video or film and would only register as a blurred rod except at v high shutter speed.
Grommo 3 years ago
???
SilentKombat 3 years ago
impossible guitar LOL in shame
icelez 3 years ago