Anarchy does not necessarily entail chaos. However, exploitation, intimidation, violence, injustice, and myridad unpleasant consequences would most likely follow from a state of anarchy. Would would boxers do if the referee wasn't in the ring?
How can you compare a referee to the state? The boxers VOLUNTARILY submit their boxing match to the judgement of the referee and his rules, they know that arbitration by a neutral party is by far favourable over any (violent) conflict that might emerge from a disagreement. The government forces their rules on others, unlike the referee, people do not voluntarily become part of a state, they become part of it by force.
Exploitation, intimidation and violence are actually the tools a government uses to force their rules on others. They are the cause of the injustice that you think you need them for to get rid of.
Anarchy would first get rid of the criminal actions of the state, and under anarchy people would willingly enter into agreements with others to protect eachother from criminals. Laws would be determined by the people, not government.
@eduardkhilify "Exploitation, initimidation and violence qre actually the tools a government uses", almost certainly - historically it is to find exemption from this fated mandate - for this is the purpose of a government, to be the wielder of these rather unpleasant instruments of realpolitik. It is endearingly wishful thinking to presume that these abberations would so obligingly disappear if the state was liquidated. They would not. As it is, I would rather have them on my side.
No of course they would not disapear. I believe that it is better to solve these issues through voluntary interaction and association, rather then by using coercion to combat coercion.
There are plenty of books and youtube videos on how laws would work without government. There are even real life examples where private arbitrations solves such issues far more effeciently then the state. I suggest you inform yourself a little more before you dismis anarchy so easily.
@eduardkhilify I'm sure a village fete commitee, or quarrelling family, can see beyond forceful coercion. However, the anarchist ideal paints mankind somewhat couleur de rose. Unfortunately, reality is not a game of cricket, everyone plays, yes, but not all by the rules. Some, indeed, have destroyed the rule-book, the ball, and taken a bat to the other players.
Thus, a qualified sovereignty is requisite. Laws are empty without executors, civilisation is empty without the law.
Laws that aren't taken for granted without executors are empty and despotiv! Implies your so called civilization is empty and hypocritical if it depends on those laws! And if you wish a dictator you might need to get back the sovereignty of your own brain again first! Life is not a game and there is no rulebook or moral made for all human beings that is not alterable. That might be your religion, believe it if you want but don't force anybody to believe it too.
@hanshallo1 Your little rant is remarkably opaque, I'm not sure if its the complete lack of cohesion in your 'argumment', or your complete disgregard for grammar.
It was a comment on one of your 'arguments'. So the lack of cohesion is based on not connecting it to this comment or might be a hint to the lack of cohesion in your argument... Where did I disregard grammar?
@hanshallo1 Reread your comment, if the grammatical short-comings don't appear immediately clear, then your English may need improving. On that note, it is difficult to fathom what your point is, I assume you are in favour of anarchism, but the mention of religion, dictators, sovereignty of the brain - these read like ramblings, not a clear argument.
You mentioned that laws executors and a sovereignty (i supposed it to be a dictatorship or did you defined it more general?) are the content of a civilization. I assumed that laws which are pointless without executors stay pointless with executors and that a civilization based on those laws is rather empty and hypocritical. And you were rambling about a cricket game and rulebooks which seems to me you are talking about some kind of religion!
I just wanted to say a law with violence and force as legitimization has no legitimization. So defining a law by executors is defining a civiliation as a dictatorship. And as you confess not all of these philosoph disallow a dictatorship. Also 'Homo homini lupus' is incompatible to anarchism or even democracy. I know that it should be an analogy but for what? Do you think their is a game or a masterplan we fail to fit in? Your kind of religion?
If the laws, comming from a social contract, conflicts with my points of view why should I sign this contract? And if I don't like the game why can't I play somthing else? And If I'm not part of the game why can executers enforce me to respect the rules? If the contract is based on commen sense there is no reason to break it. And if there is a reason I can either leave contract or try to change it. Where is the legitimization of this forced collective?
@hanshallo1 The sovereign is legitmate in enforcing the law because the law is consented to by the members of the relevant society. Political power is legitmate by consent, otherwise there is no power.
If you individually do not consent, this does not make the power of the sovereign illigitimate.
If I don't consent this, the sovereign has no legitimate power over me! The only power the sovereign has is the power the society gives to it regardless if it is a representational democracy or a dictatorship. And if I choose not giving it the legitimation it has no legitimation to rule/jugde ME! So if this society is a free decision of it's members then you don't need power because all consented the law. Otherwise the legitimation is nothing but brutal force!
A game of cricket is analogous to the functioning of a state in as much as the execution of rules/laws is a requisite. A cheat would prosper in such a game, were it not for the executors of the rules: the umpire. It's a very simple analogy.
Religion is entirely irrelevant, I'm taking about law.
Yes but if you compare the state to a game, their is a need to believe in the basic-rules and the game means seeing them as unalteralbe. And that's something called civil religion. But anyway the game we're in is no longer state, its capitalism. And the rules of this game seem to be higher rated because because states are players themselve. Btw Rousseaus image of humanity is more interessting then Hobbes although he ends up in brainwashing a dictator.
@hanshallo1 Again, its an analogy, don't read too much into it.
Rules/laws are not unalterable, this is the central principle of the legislative body in a democratic government.
'But anyway the game we're in is no longer state, its capitalism' - This point is an irrelevance. Regardless, capitalism and statehood are far from mutually exclusive.
The way I see it. Everything has to be voluntary if people wanna pay taxes to Obama they can but don't force everyone with threats and manipulate there actions with violence and threats... This applies to everything the government forces us to do
Anarchism is the ultimate form of individualism, and as such is the total opposite of collectivism. But in order for this to remain so, anarchists must remain CONSISTENT. I feel that consistent individualism would ALLOW for capitalism (in the simplest and least baggage-carrying meaning of that word), but never mandate it. Similarly, if such systems were wholly voluntaristic, socialism, syndicalism, and even communism would be ALLOWED, but never MANDATED in consistent individualist theory. Well?
I would not say that those are characteristic qualities of capitalism (how can I as an Anarcho-Capitalist?), but rather, the qualities of collectivism. Those deeds have occurred in capitalist societies and socialist and nationalist societies, but is inherent in none of those philosophies. It is inherent to collectivism, including collectivist capitalism, better known as corporatism, very similar to Fascism. What say you?
What kind of anarchist? I am also an anarchist, but there is some considerable tension between one branch of that philosophy with the other. I am influenced by Proudhon, Bastiat (not an anarchist), Rothbard, and some aspects of Bakunin, but find the teachings of Kropotkin and Chomsky to be very troubling. Having said that, I do respect all anarchists, and regardless of where you stand, I respect and admire you.
Anarcho-Capitalist here as well. She seems to be a follower of the collectivist branch of anarchism (syndicalist/communist). It's a shame there are such tensions between the collectivist and individualist branches. Anarcho-capitalism does not prevent voluntary collectivist communities to be formed. Unfortunatly colletivist anarchists seem convinced we are evil bourgeoisie trying to exploit them through wage labour and don't accept us as being true anarchists.
I was wondering when I would get a conversation started on this. Yes. I had my suspicions that that was the case, just didn't want to paint with a broad brush, since syndicalists, mutualists, communists, and strict-collectivists within anarchy all appear to have more in common than any of them with anarcho-capitalists. I find mutualism and collectivism to be more compatible with anarcho-capitalism than the other two. Proudhon and Bastiat, though foes, were on speaking terms. :)
@eduardkhilify It would also seem that she is no nihilist, so perhaps she accepts at least some form of rights, even natural rights. So, she is probably not a hard core syndicalist/communist or a stirnerist.
"It is inherent to collectivism, including collectivist capitalism, better known as corporatism, very similar to Fascism." (SakaScotii)
"Anarcho-capitalism does not prevent voluntary collectivist communities to be formed"
(eduardkhilify)
Implies one of you is either a liar or an idiot/ignorant. Wagework is a form of exploitation and Capitalism provides only owning property or wagework (or dying!). Thats maybe liberal but not anarchistic! Property is therft!
I am talking about voluntary collectives and SakaScotii is talking about forced collective (nation-states). The rest of your comment is also just toying with semantics. Stating "property is theft" is meaningless without first defining property and theft. The same goes for defining "capitalism" and "exploitation".
Without knowing our definitions of things you are just attacking a strawman. And I don't feel the need to be involved in strawman arguementation.
I guess I know what you ment and what SakaScotii ment while bashing collectivsm in any form as the evil! Define these words if my obvious definitions doesnt suits you. All I heared of ACs were the mantras "the market will fix it all" "property is the most valuable right" which ended up in minarchism (conserving the most violent pressures of a state) or private armys and a cold war situation to protect property! Which has nothing to do with anarchy!
Yes, a free-market economy can fix anything to the best of human ability. The economy isn't something we invented, it is the collective action of all humans combined. The economy is the biggest collective imaginable, but in order to make it work we need to consider the needs and desires of each individual in it: a free-market.
Property is the most valuable right. You own yourself right? Your body is your property.
To me this sound always like a form of sect or religion. Or like you mentioned a forced collectiv. The problem I see is first we own only ourselves nothing more and not tradeable; The rest is not/self- owned, common property or claimed and unclaimed what is nothing but theft! The second is capitalism is competitiv, has systemly winners and losers and a winner is in terms of competition not willingly/able to support losers who are in fact Individuals too!
Anarcho-capitalism is a confusing term. Because the anarchism in it doesn't mean the same thing as it does in other anarchisms like "anarcho-syndicalism". I did not choose it, but I use it because it is accepted in the "anarcho-capitalist" community. I prefer to call it "stateless capitalism".
So I see it as a form of social darwinism which will result in riots, a "voluntary-security-system" which is comparealbe to a state or the losers to pray to the market and die in poverty... . Sry for being that cynical I don't actually know why. Meaning it is impossible for me to unterstand how it can be selfsustaining, free and lifeable at the same time and to all people. More an Orwellian never ending (Trade-) world war (without states).
"ITS WHAT I READ AND CHOSE. its kind of like religion. whichever persons religion and god they worship is the REAL and RIGHT god to them... this is what I have formed from multiple sources.. so.. yeah."
Umm no, there either is a god or there isn't; it's not a subjective issue. Politics is a bit squishier but it's still more objective than you make it out to be.
anarchy is possible. there have already been sveral attempts which worked for years but there always came people from outside who were jealous and they destroyed it.
if there is murder or such thing, it would not be anarchy. anarchy mean "without power, controll". murder is power other somebody.
@SIGN666 Exactly. Life would be a whole lot easier, one problem, what about jobs? Doctors? Shipping? Education and food? If people would voulenteer to do this important stuff i would be 100% anarchist.
Why do you thing leaving organizations behind that force you to do something you don't want to means going backward to stone age?? If there is no goverment and no capitalism, would you forget all your skills? Will all forget about their needs to drink to eat to enjoy live...? That means humans organize their lives on their own, and not get the important stuff provided by servants/slaves/volunteers... And if education is not for Sale it can never be sold out... (only spread...)
One day *some good people of anarchy town decide they need to cross the large river to the south. *Not everyone agrees, but *most say a bridge is the best way. The size of the river makes it crucial for the engineer to organize his labor with exact precision. The structure stands as a monument to leadership and *some people begin to wonder about organizing in other fields like their community. Many think they know which way is best, but they all have different ideas. So *some decide to vote...
anyone who thinks anarchy is chaos is uneducated on the subject. they believe the skewed view of anarchism that they've seen on the corporate media that shows the black bloc destroying banks. they never go into depth about what anarchism is... cooperation, mutual aid, true liberty without coercion of government. if anyone wants a good introduction on anarchism read Demand the impossible: a history of anarchism by peter marshall. also No gods no masters by daniel guerin.
okay, i am on my brother's account, but i am a true anarchist. I believe that governments are corrupt, religions are feeble, and that the only way that we as a human species can survive is by putting together our self worth. We as a people should not hate eachother, but the beings who keep us in bondage, the governments, the religious fanantics, and any other person who will supress our beliefs. We are anarchists, i am an anarchist, and i am proud. I do not enjoy government, but i keep peace.
okay, i am on my brother's account, but i am a true anarchist. I believe that governments are corrupt, religions are feeble, and that the only way that we as a human species can survive is by putting together our self worth. We as a people should not hate eachother, but the beings who keep us in bondage, the governments, the religious fanantics, and any other person who will supress our beliefs. We are anarchists, i am an anarchist, and i am proud. I do not enjoy government, but i keep peace."V"
you should have listen to your friend i dont think you know what your talking about, capitolism is better defined as the rule of wealth, violance is more partial to socialism, for further details see history, that website is off balance anyone that preaches socialism and smaller government is in fact advocating oligarchy or at least that will be the end result, and dont forget without law there can be no freedom, sweetheart you should try looking into libertarianism... thats my party.
0:48 You pronounced autonomous wrongly. But I agree with everything you said. People that associate anarchism with chaos are stupid or brainwashed. People who think anarchy would lead to mass free-for-all murder and looting need to evaluate their own morality. Whoever is reading this, do you have the desire to murder and steal? Neither do 99.99% of people. Why do people blindly accept being ruled and having their money stolen by a threatening, militant, all powerful gang called the government?
I am a Anomic Anarchist(You wont find the definition if you look it up),Or what everybody would think an anarchist is,such as chaos and such.But it is only cause i believe that true anarchy can only be acheived through violence and action. i have nothing against any other form of anarchy i just think that it is impossible to acheive anything without action.
@nightmare2772 I completely disagree with your theory. If you use violence and force to topple a powerful gang that uses violence and force, then you are a hypocrite. And if you were somehow able to destroy the government's army, that would mean you would have amassed an army of your own. You wouldn't be removing power, you would be transferring it.
well it taks people like us to make people like them, and it takes people like them to make people like us...its a never ending thing anarchy and law like things will always be around but law has the upper hand..cuz the people will rather surve under some one. than to be smaked down...ther afrade to stand up for them selfs and for somthing bigger..but thats just me..ill say what i whant and do as I whan't
anarchy is chaos in a sense... it's the baring of the word that makes it hard in conversation but chaos is also a good thing.
The market is chaotic, unregulated, for most unfathomable and above all. Chaos literly means when one has no grip on the situation. people always think of anarchy and chaos in the negative sense.. while it has a huge positive side as well.
it's the politicians that give it the brand " Chaos = murder distruction and terror"
Anarchism is just shit. Only nationalism is the solution. Like it or not, nationalism is the fastest growing ideology at the moment. You are a disgusting tiny minority of disillusioned people who live in a lalaland. Fuck you
and i thought all the hot chicks were stupid bitches who knew nothing about the government. im gonna start an anarchist movement in my town so far iv got 4 people rotfl ANARCHY!
Any one who says Anarchy is chaos has never read a single Anarchist book, and must not be able to function in any way without someone elses guide and permission.
@SIGN666 i stongly agree with ur statment and with anarchist phylosipy but there is a flaw with your logic. not all "communes" are in the intrest of women i mean once comuity based government systems form theres still chance that one will become some sorta crazzy religuse cult that belives in marrying 11 years olds with 40 year olds lol
slc punk and punk bands are the reason people think anarchists are terrorists who throw bombs and assassinate politicians. the anarchist cookbook is also responsible for that stereotype
Aren't you supporting capitalism by owning a pc and paying for your internet service? Let alone owning WINDOWS? didn't you buy the clothes you're wearing? ...
There's a lot of hypocrisy in what you're saying.. Maybe you should think a bit more before you publicly embarrass yourself on a website that happens be owned by Google, another massive corporation.
@ninj4sugarbyte By that logic you support child soldiers and rape by owning a cell phone made with material dug up in Congo. By that logic those who supported bourgeois republicanism in the 17th century should have preferred to starve rather than consume agricultural products created under feudalism. You're stupidity is quite stunning.
@Xenu First of all, I'm simply pointing out contradictions in her argument.
Second of all, as an educated consumer, I have choices on where I choose to put my money. On what I decide to support, be that animal cruelty free cosmetics, recycled plastic products, etc. Your argument is quite naive to be honest. Third of all, your attempt at insulting me is just hilarious. Learn how to spell before you call someone stupid, tool.
Why can't everyone just drop everything and help eachother, it's possible. What happens is we start cummunties that grow food for everyone else within that cooperative village so nobody starves. There are poeple that sew, bake bread and create other goods that are to be shared to those who need them. There is no police and no rules, only the sense of right and wrong, we live for each other in love, hippiness and harmony :) (In my dreams)
If our goverment peacfully resigns, and the state would officially become anarchist. What would happend to the police force? The people? heck, the army? I as hell wouldn't wanna be there as it wouldn't be able to work peacefully.
anarchist unite! this is our fight! get a grip and free your soul! if all you want is death by dozen! then get the fuck out! and all you people think it would be hell! think again! all we want is to live free! our fate is sealed and yours is mine! keep it up and give it time! one day we shall rule and leave everything behind!
post this on every anarchy video you can find and LET US BE HEARD
"Does not imply chaos" - Ha ha ha - that has to be the statement of the year. Everytime there are marches against capitalism and so on, its always the guys with the masks and the Anarchy flags who destroy shops, attack police and burn cars - Funny that anarchists are against wars, but don't seem to have problems using violence against police, businesses and other peoples properties !!!
@theworldvideos1 These are NOT anarchists but rather feds posing as anarchists to demonize anarchy. Just like Ron Paul is posing as a freedom fighter though he is a NWO shill.
Thanks for that. You're cute and a Radical... as expected, us radicals are always better! But anarchy, or participatory democray, or interdependence, starts with community and that means sharing the idea with neighbors, agreeing on goals, not beliefs, and then creating action. Action that will replace hierarchal institutions, especially corporations... by finding ways to create food, water, electricity, sharing shelter, creating alternative goods from other people's junk (electric cars)...
You should read Black Flame: The revolutionary class politics of Anarchism and Syndicalism available from AK Press and Amazon. Also you may have heard of the Anarchist Black Cat internet forum.
in fact she is anarchist than I coz she trying to think for herself first then reading the works of others, if she makes mistakes well thats showing she is human and NOT pretending to be a know it all or omipresent powerful being which would in itself go against notion of anarchism!
They just disgareed with one or all forms of power-over such as
command-and-obey, domination and heirarchy in all its forms Feudalist, Statist, Captialist etc... Now if she agrees with that then she is an An-archist!,
the rudness of some folk on this comment link clearly shows the bullying factor in action and therefore the wish to dominate or use power over another by simply dismissing them out of hand. Look Annissae was merely stating the principles of anarchism, while there are many theories and many things she may not be aware about so what, history shows many up risings which where anarchist in nature where by most folk who never read a word of anarchist theory in their life!
I don't see how this would be an argument against anarchism but rather an argument against government itself. If people are violent by nature, surely you don't want to give a small group of people a monopoly of power and force, i.e the government. Non-sense.
:) good job, i'm a teenage girl activist too, so you're not alone. read some alan moore comics, they're more help on explaining anarchy. i'm happy that you have faith in humanity too!
people are violent by nature. <--- wouldn't agree with this assertion. Most people are NOT violent. That's an observation and it is a fact. How many times in your life you are acting violently ? I guess, very very rarely.
I dont quite get why everyone jumps to stariotypical conclusions of political ideoligies like Marxism or Anarchism instead of looking it up themselves or reaserching it?
Hey girl might i say, your gorgeous, and i too am an anarchist, i steal, i smoke weed, i do what the fuck i want when i want, fuck the law, and if thats what your into then fuck these haters let em talk shit but they can burn in hell
Dude I really think you are missing the entire point of the movement. The part of you that makes you steal, smoke weed, and what ever else you do is a side of you that you will soon out grow. The want for true freedom from the laws and athority that is not your own, that is what makes you an anarchist my friend.
You're young... i know you probably hate hearing that but.. i wikipedia a LOT of things.. just please.. please dont wikipedia more complex things like anarchy and things because you are going to get a lot of.. bias.. basically because of how easy it is to manipulate wikipedia. these people who say anarchy = chaos.. of course thats a matter of perspective, thats one of the things you need to research (FURTHER than wiki) and please, by all means get back to me, would love to hear what you learn.
it isn't good to disarm the GOOD people and let the criminals run riot as they do now!!! EVERYONE should be armed and capable of self defense for a start. The state doesnt allow us to carry weapons, yet people still get stabbed and shot by scumbags on the streets....
honey, I like your views. It's good to see real anarchists out there, instead of everyone in their little "punk" phase wearing anarchist signs and not understanding a thing about it.
The bottom line is: Even if you want to be peaceful and shit, you aren't everybody. Anarchy can only end it chaos. Other people will take advantage of the freedom. Government owned jails will be emptied, and criminals will fill the streets. Your little group of peaceful people will get run over.
How can there be jails if there are no police? Fail. And not all crimes are based on greed. If I'm fucked in the head, and I want to go on a killing spree, I will, because there are no police. And I could form a group of murderers and rapists to help. And I'm pretty sure a bunch of psychotic murderers could take on a bunch of overweight hot topic shopping angsty teens like you.
would have been better using your own feelings and conceptions of anarchy! We all know that anarchy in the end is having a utopian state but unfortunately it is an impossible dream as human nature create leaders and rulers.
state is chaos, and it is theft and force at the margins, authoritarian abuse and coercion. and anarchists are the people who see the this as opposed to people like realmetalknux who are blinded by the misconception that anarchy means no laws or police systems.
If the government and police ever get removed from society, I will personally come to your house, beat you, and rape you. And there will be no police system to stop me or try to exact justice on me. If you come back for revenge, I'll kill you. Sounds like a great society, huh? And reading some words off wikipedia makes a terrible argument. Sorry if I seem really harsh, but I'm looking for a plausible reason why anarchy could possibly be good, and I can't find one.
try looking through videos from auamoti and confederalsocialist. and junior00bacon00chee, you won't have trouble seeing plausible reasons smack you in the face and rape you. this girl's got more real brains than you do, honestly.
im of greek decent and i agree with my fellow brothern MRGREEKPATRIOT, ide say ima modernday anarchist and wud only due a peaceful "RIOT", but if extreme measures are needed then i say givem hell!, down with capitalism!!!
oi xores den katastrefontai epeidi kaigontai merikes simaies..
oi xores katastrefontai otan yparxoun kammenoi,syntiritikoi eggefaloi,pou oudemia sxesi exoun me tin arxaia ellada kai ton xristianismo pou kai kala agapoun.
olo logia eiste..apo nionio miden.
Ela na me kaneis sapouni kai tha pas apo konserva kai meta stous pappoudes sou stin pigada tou meligala,malaka..vgalane kai glosa oi fasistes aptis trypes tous..
i hate bullshit. authority has no use in society, all it does is make eople full of shit. im tired of everyone thinkng anarchy is just complete chaos.
"Your comment lacks any coherent logic.".......So what in the hell is logical about having a people set aside to make decisions for you (i.e. the government)??????? (and I probably know more about the government than you ever will)
I am anarcho christian and anarcho primitivist :) anarchists are not hooligans, but real anarchists are tottaly different, they are mostly peacefull protesters!! people usualy mistake us fot those hooligans wearing masks an stuf like that
ah but it does actually derive from the Greek word cant remember it right now, but the Greek meaning actually means chaos, torment and destruction to a higher authority such as government, or even your school principal. And also, don't believe everything on the internet, most of its bullshit.
anarchism is possible, plain and simple we feel it through our vains when we are younger as we get older ( speeking for mass not on personal levels ) we become confused and give up, thus conforming but by nature humans are anarchistic, our enemys are now just confused, un open to the philosophy of anarchism, and thus conform and the system contenues, all we are missing is mass informing of well, the mass
Anarchism is a great idea, if it would've worked. Pretty much like communism. Anarchism and theoritical communism is almost the same thing in my opinion
Anarchism is activism. Direct action. You can't be an anarchist and sit on your ass. It's listening to Against Me!'s "Baby, I'm an Anarchist," and claiming that you are one all of a sudden. It is process, definitely not something you can become in a day and not a cool term to throw around like those lame hipsters. It's throwing out all ideas about hierarchy and stepping up and acting on what you believe in, and creating that better world you know is possible.
Its possible..but its hard tough..love your message.
SiouxSyndicate 1 month ago
I doubt this girl really understands what Anarchism is.
Karmara7 2 months ago
Hasta la victoria siempre!
ProfHofmann 2 months ago
Anarchy does not necessarily entail chaos. However, exploitation, intimidation, violence, injustice, and myridad unpleasant consequences would most likely follow from a state of anarchy. Would would boxers do if the referee wasn't in the ring?
craigpsimpson 4 months ago
@craigpsimpson
How can you compare a referee to the state? The boxers VOLUNTARILY submit their boxing match to the judgement of the referee and his rules, they know that arbitration by a neutral party is by far favourable over any (violent) conflict that might emerge from a disagreement. The government forces their rules on others, unlike the referee, people do not voluntarily become part of a state, they become part of it by force.
eduardkhilify 3 months ago
@craigpsimpson continued
Exploitation, intimidation and violence are actually the tools a government uses to force their rules on others. They are the cause of the injustice that you think you need them for to get rid of.
Anarchy would first get rid of the criminal actions of the state, and under anarchy people would willingly enter into agreements with others to protect eachother from criminals. Laws would be determined by the people, not government.
eduardkhilify 3 months ago
@eduardkhilify "Exploitation, initimidation and violence qre actually the tools a government uses", almost certainly - historically it is to find exemption from this fated mandate - for this is the purpose of a government, to be the wielder of these rather unpleasant instruments of realpolitik. It is endearingly wishful thinking to presume that these abberations would so obligingly disappear if the state was liquidated. They would not. As it is, I would rather have them on my side.
craigpsimpson 3 months ago
@craigpsimpson
No of course they would not disapear. I believe that it is better to solve these issues through voluntary interaction and association, rather then by using coercion to combat coercion.
There are plenty of books and youtube videos on how laws would work without government. There are even real life examples where private arbitrations solves such issues far more effeciently then the state. I suggest you inform yourself a little more before you dismis anarchy so easily.
eduardkhilify 3 months ago
@eduardkhilify I'm sure a village fete commitee, or quarrelling family, can see beyond forceful coercion. However, the anarchist ideal paints mankind somewhat couleur de rose. Unfortunately, reality is not a game of cricket, everyone plays, yes, but not all by the rules. Some, indeed, have destroyed the rule-book, the ball, and taken a bat to the other players.
Thus, a qualified sovereignty is requisite. Laws are empty without executors, civilisation is empty without the law.
craigpsimpson 3 months ago
@craigpsimpson
Laws that aren't taken for granted without executors are empty and despotiv! Implies your so called civilization is empty and hypocritical if it depends on those laws! And if you wish a dictator you might need to get back the sovereignty of your own brain again first! Life is not a game and there is no rulebook or moral made for all human beings that is not alterable. That might be your religion, believe it if you want but don't force anybody to believe it too.
hanshallo1 2 months ago in playlist Weitere Videos von annissae
@hanshallo1 Your little rant is remarkably opaque, I'm not sure if its the complete lack of cohesion in your 'argumment', or your complete disgregard for grammar.
craigpsimpson 1 month ago
@craigpsimpson
It was a comment on one of your 'arguments'. So the lack of cohesion is based on not connecting it to this comment or might be a hint to the lack of cohesion in your argument... Where did I disregard grammar?
hanshallo1 1 month ago
@hanshallo1 Reread your comment, if the grammatical short-comings don't appear immediately clear, then your English may need improving. On that note, it is difficult to fathom what your point is, I assume you are in favour of anarchism, but the mention of religion, dictators, sovereignty of the brain - these read like ramblings, not a clear argument.
craigpsimpson 1 month ago
@craigpsimpson
You mentioned that laws executors and a sovereignty (i supposed it to be a dictatorship or did you defined it more general?) are the content of a civilization. I assumed that laws which are pointless without executors stay pointless with executors and that a civilization based on those laws is rather empty and hypocritical. And you were rambling about a cricket game and rulebooks which seems to me you are talking about some kind of religion!
hanshallo1 1 month ago
@hanshallo1 Laws are pointless/empty without executors, because in such a situation they are stripped of their juridical efficacy.
The sovereign I refer to is a term from Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant - it doesn't have to be a dictatorial force.
Cricket was used analogously, and I completely fail to see where religion fits in.
craigpsimpson 1 month ago
@craigpsimpson
I just wanted to say a law with violence and force as legitimization has no legitimization. So defining a law by executors is defining a civiliation as a dictatorship. And as you confess not all of these philosoph disallow a dictatorship. Also 'Homo homini lupus' is incompatible to anarchism or even democracy. I know that it should be an analogy but for what? Do you think their is a game or a masterplan we fail to fit in? Your kind of religion?
hanshallo1 1 month ago
@hanshallo1 Executing laws does not legitimise them, but the executive remains necessary to ensure the observance of legitimate laws.
I am not defining legislation in terms of its relation to the executive, I am explaining that legislation is empty without guaranteed enforcement.
You're right, dictatorship is permissable in the social contract - this does not make it necessary.
I am fully aware that 'homo homini lupus' is incompatible with anarchism, this is my point.
Continued...
craigpsimpson 1 month ago 2
@craigpsimpson
If the laws, comming from a social contract, conflicts with my points of view why should I sign this contract? And if I don't like the game why can't I play somthing else? And If I'm not part of the game why can executers enforce me to respect the rules? If the contract is based on commen sense there is no reason to break it. And if there is a reason I can either leave contract or try to change it. Where is the legitimization of this forced collective?
hanshallo1 1 month ago
@hanshallo1 The sovereign is legitmate in enforcing the law because the law is consented to by the members of the relevant society. Political power is legitmate by consent, otherwise there is no power.
If you individually do not consent, this does not make the power of the sovereign illigitimate.
craigpsimpson 1 month ago 3
@craigpsimpson
If I don't consent this, the sovereign has no legitimate power over me! The only power the sovereign has is the power the society gives to it regardless if it is a representational democracy or a dictatorship. And if I choose not giving it the legitimation it has no legitimation to rule/jugde ME! So if this society is a free decision of it's members then you don't need power because all consented the law. Otherwise the legitimation is nothing but brutal force!
hanshallo1 1 month ago
@hanshallo1 .......continued:
A game of cricket is analogous to the functioning of a state in as much as the execution of rules/laws is a requisite. A cheat would prosper in such a game, were it not for the executors of the rules: the umpire. It's a very simple analogy.
Religion is entirely irrelevant, I'm taking about law.
craigpsimpson 1 month ago
@craigpsimpson
Yes but if you compare the state to a game, their is a need to believe in the basic-rules and the game means seeing them as unalteralbe. And that's something called civil religion. But anyway the game we're in is no longer state, its capitalism. And the rules of this game seem to be higher rated because because states are players themselve. Btw Rousseaus image of humanity is more interessting then Hobbes although he ends up in brainwashing a dictator.
hanshallo1 1 month ago
@hanshallo1 Again, its an analogy, don't read too much into it.
Rules/laws are not unalterable, this is the central principle of the legislative body in a democratic government.
'But anyway the game we're in is no longer state, its capitalism' - This point is an irrelevance. Regardless, capitalism and statehood are far from mutually exclusive.
craigpsimpson 1 month ago
The way I see it. Everything has to be voluntary if people wanna pay taxes to Obama they can but don't force everyone with threats and manipulate there actions with violence and threats... This applies to everything the government forces us to do
citizenlares 4 months ago
And, so as to disarm you, if I may be so bold, let me also say that you are very beautiful!
SakaScotii 4 months ago
Anarchism is the ultimate form of individualism, and as such is the total opposite of collectivism. But in order for this to remain so, anarchists must remain CONSISTENT. I feel that consistent individualism would ALLOW for capitalism (in the simplest and least baggage-carrying meaning of that word), but never mandate it. Similarly, if such systems were wholly voluntaristic, socialism, syndicalism, and even communism would be ALLOWED, but never MANDATED in consistent individualist theory. Well?
SakaScotii 4 months ago
I would not say that those are characteristic qualities of capitalism (how can I as an Anarcho-Capitalist?), but rather, the qualities of collectivism. Those deeds have occurred in capitalist societies and socialist and nationalist societies, but is inherent in none of those philosophies. It is inherent to collectivism, including collectivist capitalism, better known as corporatism, very similar to Fascism. What say you?
SakaScotii 4 months ago
What kind of anarchist? I am also an anarchist, but there is some considerable tension between one branch of that philosophy with the other. I am influenced by Proudhon, Bastiat (not an anarchist), Rothbard, and some aspects of Bakunin, but find the teachings of Kropotkin and Chomsky to be very troubling. Having said that, I do respect all anarchists, and regardless of where you stand, I respect and admire you.
SakaScotii 4 months ago
Comment removed
eduardkhilify 3 months ago
@SakaScotii
Anarcho-Capitalist here as well. She seems to be a follower of the collectivist branch of anarchism (syndicalist/communist). It's a shame there are such tensions between the collectivist and individualist branches. Anarcho-capitalism does not prevent voluntary collectivist communities to be formed. Unfortunatly colletivist anarchists seem convinced we are evil bourgeoisie trying to exploit them through wage labour and don't accept us as being true anarchists.
eduardkhilify 3 months ago
Comment removed
Keimh3regPeh2uMeg 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@eduardkhilify
I was wondering when I would get a conversation started on this. Yes. I had my suspicions that that was the case, just didn't want to paint with a broad brush, since syndicalists, mutualists, communists, and strict-collectivists within anarchy all appear to have more in common than any of them with anarcho-capitalists. I find mutualism and collectivism to be more compatible with anarcho-capitalism than the other two. Proudhon and Bastiat, though foes, were on speaking terms. :)
SakaScotii 3 months ago
@eduardkhilify It would also seem that she is no nihilist, so perhaps she accepts at least some form of rights, even natural rights. So, she is probably not a hard core syndicalist/communist or a stirnerist.
SakaScotii 3 months ago
@eduardkhilify
"It is inherent to collectivism, including collectivist capitalism, better known as corporatism, very similar to Fascism." (SakaScotii)
"Anarcho-capitalism does not prevent voluntary collectivist communities to be formed"
(eduardkhilify)
Implies one of you is either a liar or an idiot/ignorant. Wagework is a form of exploitation and Capitalism provides only owning property or wagework (or dying!). Thats maybe liberal but not anarchistic! Property is therft!
hanshallo1 2 months ago
@hanshallo1
I am talking about voluntary collectives and SakaScotii is talking about forced collective (nation-states). The rest of your comment is also just toying with semantics. Stating "property is theft" is meaningless without first defining property and theft. The same goes for defining "capitalism" and "exploitation".
Without knowing our definitions of things you are just attacking a strawman. And I don't feel the need to be involved in strawman arguementation.
eduardkhilify 2 months ago
@eduardkhilify
I guess I know what you ment and what SakaScotii ment while bashing collectivsm in any form as the evil! Define these words if my obvious definitions doesnt suits you. All I heared of ACs were the mantras "the market will fix it all" "property is the most valuable right" which ended up in minarchism (conserving the most violent pressures of a state) or private armys and a cold war situation to protect property! Which has nothing to do with anarchy!
hanshallo1 2 months ago
@hanshallo1
Yes, a free-market economy can fix anything to the best of human ability. The economy isn't something we invented, it is the collective action of all humans combined. The economy is the biggest collective imaginable, but in order to make it work we need to consider the needs and desires of each individual in it: a free-market.
Property is the most valuable right. You own yourself right? Your body is your property.
eduardkhilify 2 months ago
@eduardkhilify
To me this sound always like a form of sect or religion. Or like you mentioned a forced collectiv. The problem I see is first we own only ourselves nothing more and not tradeable; The rest is not/self- owned, common property or claimed and unclaimed what is nothing but theft! The second is capitalism is competitiv, has systemly winners and losers and a winner is in terms of competition not willingly/able to support losers who are in fact Individuals too!
hanshallo1 2 months ago
@hanshallo1
@hanshallo1
Anarcho-capitalism is a confusing term. Because the anarchism in it doesn't mean the same thing as it does in other anarchisms like "anarcho-syndicalism". I did not choose it, but I use it because it is accepted in the "anarcho-capitalist" community. I prefer to call it "stateless capitalism".
eduardkhilify 2 months ago
@eduardkhilify
So I see it as a form of social darwinism which will result in riots, a "voluntary-security-system" which is comparealbe to a state or the losers to pray to the market and die in poverty... . Sry for being that cynical I don't actually know why. Meaning it is impossible for me to unterstand how it can be selfsustaining, free and lifeable at the same time and to all people. More an Orwellian never ending (Trade-) world war (without states).
hanshallo1 2 months ago
ur beutiful...
blade01109 4 months ago
"ITS WHAT I READ AND CHOSE. its kind of like religion. whichever persons religion and god they worship is the REAL and RIGHT god to them... this is what I have formed from multiple sources.. so.. yeah."
Umm no, there either is a god or there isn't; it's not a subjective issue. Politics is a bit squishier but it's still more objective than you make it out to be.
Trimbler00 9 months ago
anarchy is possible. there have already been sveral attempts which worked for years but there always came people from outside who were jealous and they destroyed it.
if there is murder or such thing, it would not be anarchy. anarchy mean "without power, controll". murder is power other somebody.
no gods. no states. no servants.
(A)
6ch6ris6 10 months ago
@SIGN666 Exactly. Life would be a whole lot easier, one problem, what about jobs? Doctors? Shipping? Education and food? If people would voulenteer to do this important stuff i would be 100% anarchist.
Jellybeawesome 11 months ago
@Jellybeawesome
Why do you thing leaving organizations behind that force you to do something you don't want to means going backward to stone age?? If there is no goverment and no capitalism, would you forget all your skills? Will all forget about their needs to drink to eat to enjoy live...? That means humans organize their lives on their own, and not get the important stuff provided by servants/slaves/volunteers... And if education is not for Sale it can never be sold out... (only spread...)
hanshallo1 9 months ago
shes right because she has boobs.
DieOrBlink 1 year ago
One day *some good people of anarchy town decide they need to cross the large river to the south. *Not everyone agrees, but *most say a bridge is the best way. The size of the river makes it crucial for the engineer to organize his labor with exact precision. The structure stands as a monument to leadership and *some people begin to wonder about organizing in other fields like their community. Many think they know which way is best, but they all have different ideas. So *some decide to vote...
zapblaster 1 year ago
Anarchy is Love...
wiscokiddd 1 year ago
anyone who thinks anarchy is chaos is uneducated on the subject. they believe the skewed view of anarchism that they've seen on the corporate media that shows the black bloc destroying banks. they never go into depth about what anarchism is... cooperation, mutual aid, true liberty without coercion of government. if anyone wants a good introduction on anarchism read Demand the impossible: a history of anarchism by peter marshall. also No gods no masters by daniel guerin.
mikeadever 1 year ago
okay, i am on my brother's account, but i am a true anarchist. I believe that governments are corrupt, religions are feeble, and that the only way that we as a human species can survive is by putting together our self worth. We as a people should not hate eachother, but the beings who keep us in bondage, the governments, the religious fanantics, and any other person who will supress our beliefs. We are anarchists, i am an anarchist, and i am proud. I do not enjoy government, but i keep peace.
countryboy4500 1 year ago
okay, i am on my brother's account, but i am a true anarchist. I believe that governments are corrupt, religions are feeble, and that the only way that we as a human species can survive is by putting together our self worth. We as a people should not hate eachother, but the beings who keep us in bondage, the governments, the religious fanantics, and any other person who will supress our beliefs. We are anarchists, i am an anarchist, and i am proud. I do not enjoy government, but i keep peace."V"
countryboy4500 1 year ago
look into the spanish revolution...you'll be very surprised
xmattycorex 1 year ago
you should have listen to your friend i dont think you know what your talking about, capitolism is better defined as the rule of wealth, violance is more partial to socialism, for further details see history, that website is off balance anyone that preaches socialism and smaller government is in fact advocating oligarchy or at least that will be the end result, and dont forget without law there can be no freedom, sweetheart you should try looking into libertarianism... thats my party.
bobo66668888 1 year ago
(A)
MovieMagicMaster 1 year ago
Theres no government like no government. Ⓐ because we are not truly free until set free.
maxxx4668 1 year ago
People should be allowed to think what they want.....
Scmdx 1 year ago 2
black flag
johnnyupchuck 1 year ago
Comment removed
lordplaya8 1 year ago
Cool to see this from so long ago. Check out our channel.
repfreedomforce 1 year ago
0:48 You pronounced autonomous wrongly. But I agree with everything you said. People that associate anarchism with chaos are stupid or brainwashed. People who think anarchy would lead to mass free-for-all murder and looting need to evaluate their own morality. Whoever is reading this, do you have the desire to murder and steal? Neither do 99.99% of people. Why do people blindly accept being ruled and having their money stolen by a threatening, militant, all powerful gang called the government?
DjZephy 1 year ago 6
I am a Anomic Anarchist(You wont find the definition if you look it up),Or what everybody would think an anarchist is,such as chaos and such.But it is only cause i believe that true anarchy can only be acheived through violence and action. i have nothing against any other form of anarchy i just think that it is impossible to acheive anything without action.
nightmare2772 1 year ago
@nightmare2772 I completely disagree with your theory. If you use violence and force to topple a powerful gang that uses violence and force, then you are a hypocrite. And if you were somehow able to destroy the government's army, that would mean you would have amassed an army of your own. You wouldn't be removing power, you would be transferring it.
DjZephy 1 year ago 5
@DjZephy I understand completely what you mean. Its just what a believe.
nightmare2772 1 year ago
well it taks people like us to make people like them, and it takes people like them to make people like us...its a never ending thing anarchy and law like things will always be around but law has the upper hand..cuz the people will rather surve under some one. than to be smaked down...ther afrade to stand up for them selfs and for somthing bigger..but thats just me..ill say what i whant and do as I whan't
Godovnothingness 1 year ago
anarchy is chaos in a sense... it's the baring of the word that makes it hard in conversation but chaos is also a good thing.
The market is chaotic, unregulated, for most unfathomable and above all. Chaos literly means when one has no grip on the situation. people always think of anarchy and chaos in the negative sense.. while it has a huge positive side as well.
it's the politicians that give it the brand " Chaos = murder distruction and terror"
razoorsharp 1 year ago
fuck you imaginetheblue socialist asshole
crusader881 1 year ago
i believe the same things you do right on anarchy isn't about chaos its about having peace and equality without government
crusader881 1 year ago
Erin = tard.
ZamatoElite 1 year ago
Anarchism is just shit. Only nationalism is the solution. Like it or not, nationalism is the fastest growing ideology at the moment. You are a disgusting tiny minority of disillusioned people who live in a lalaland. Fuck you
ImagineTheBlue 1 year ago
and i thought all the hot chicks were stupid bitches who knew nothing about the government. im gonna start an anarchist movement in my town so far iv got 4 people rotfl ANARCHY!
xxxxxTRISTIANxxxxx 1 year ago
auto nome us
MikeSkiera 1 year ago
Any one who says Anarchy is chaos has never read a single Anarchist book, and must not be able to function in any way without someone elses guide and permission.
nomoreyou1212 1 year ago
@SIGN666 i stongly agree with ur statment and with anarchist phylosipy but there is a flaw with your logic. not all "communes" are in the intrest of women i mean once comuity based government systems form theres still chance that one will become some sorta crazzy religuse cult that belives in marrying 11 years olds with 40 year olds lol
Chopstixz5 1 year ago
what does violence have to do with the free trade between individuals (free-market), with violence? o_O
thats an unfair statement i think.
SunBeamsan 1 year ago
slc punk and punk bands are the reason people think anarchists are terrorists who throw bombs and assassinate politicians. the anarchist cookbook is also responsible for that stereotype
scatcoitus 1 year ago
You are stupid.
Suislide12 1 year ago
Aren't you supporting capitalism by owning a pc and paying for your internet service? Let alone owning WINDOWS? didn't you buy the clothes you're wearing? ...
There's a lot of hypocrisy in what you're saying.. Maybe you should think a bit more before you publicly embarrass yourself on a website that happens be owned by Google, another massive corporation.
ninj4sugarbyte 1 year ago 2
@ninj4sugarbyte By that logic you support child soldiers and rape by owning a cell phone made with material dug up in Congo. By that logic those who supported bourgeois republicanism in the 17th century should have preferred to starve rather than consume agricultural products created under feudalism. You're stupidity is quite stunning.
Xenu 1 year ago
@Xenu First of all, I'm simply pointing out contradictions in her argument.
Second of all, as an educated consumer, I have choices on where I choose to put my money. On what I decide to support, be that animal cruelty free cosmetics, recycled plastic products, etc. Your argument is quite naive to be honest. Third of all, your attempt at insulting me is just hilarious. Learn how to spell before you call someone stupid, tool.
ninj4sugarbyte 1 year ago
There are some anarchist communities in the world you can go live in if you're so keen. Google for a wikipedia list.
JetpackNinjaDinosaur 1 year ago
long live durutti, long live makhno, long live anarchy
coffinman82 1 year ago
Keep up the good fight comrade! one solution, revolution!!
geilman 1 year ago
read noam chomsky :)
Mikeofdundee1987 1 year ago
nonarchist
thisisbunk 1 year ago
Why can't everyone just drop everything and help eachother, it's possible. What happens is we start cummunties that grow food for everyone else within that cooperative village so nobody starves. There are poeple that sew, bake bread and create other goods that are to be shared to those who need them. There is no police and no rules, only the sense of right and wrong, we live for each other in love, hippiness and harmony :) (In my dreams)
ExpectResistance66 1 year ago 3
If our goverment peacfully resigns, and the state would officially become anarchist. What would happend to the police force? The people? heck, the army? I as hell wouldn't wanna be there as it wouldn't be able to work peacefully.
MAWK93 1 year ago
anarchist unite! this is our fight! get a grip and free your soul! if all you want is death by dozen! then get the fuck out! and all you people think it would be hell! think again! all we want is to live free! our fate is sealed and yours is mine! keep it up and give it time! one day we shall rule and leave everything behind!
post this on every anarchy video you can find and LET US BE HEARD
MakeaWish17 1 year ago
I think her head is in the right place but she needs to become more informed on the subject.
Jared63b 2 years ago
"Does not imply chaos" - Ha ha ha - that has to be the statement of the year. Everytime there are marches against capitalism and so on, its always the guys with the masks and the Anarchy flags who destroy shops, attack police and burn cars - Funny that anarchists are against wars, but don't seem to have problems using violence against police, businesses and other peoples properties !!!
theworldvideos1 2 years ago
That is not what anarchy is about.
orangefan9 2 years ago
They are not anarchists, they're lunatics.
ExquisiteDoom 1 year ago
@theworldvideos1 These are NOT anarchists but rather feds posing as anarchists to demonize anarchy. Just like Ron Paul is posing as a freedom fighter though he is a NWO shill.
bdog111 1 year ago
Thanks for that. You're cute and a Radical... as expected, us radicals are always better! But anarchy, or participatory democray, or interdependence, starts with community and that means sharing the idea with neighbors, agreeing on goals, not beliefs, and then creating action. Action that will replace hierarchal institutions, especially corporations... by finding ways to create food, water, electricity, sharing shelter, creating alternative goods from other people's junk (electric cars)...
storyb23 2 years ago
....and becoming an independent community that is self-sufficient/interdependent, helping one another using the idea of the Gift economy
storyb23 2 years ago
You should read Black Flame: The revolutionary class politics of Anarchism and Syndicalism available from AK Press and Amazon. Also you may have heard of the Anarchist Black Cat internet forum.
Marconi76 2 years ago
in fact she is anarchist than I coz she trying to think for herself first then reading the works of others, if she makes mistakes well thats showing she is human and NOT pretending to be a know it all or omipresent powerful being which would in itself go against notion of anarchism!
FacultyZ 2 years ago
They just disgareed with one or all forms of power-over such as
command-and-obey, domination and heirarchy in all its forms Feudalist, Statist, Captialist etc... Now if she agrees with that then she is an An-archist!,
FacultyZ 2 years ago
the rudness of some folk on this comment link clearly shows the bullying factor in action and therefore the wish to dominate or use power over another by simply dismissing them out of hand. Look Annissae was merely stating the principles of anarchism, while there are many theories and many things she may not be aware about so what, history shows many up risings which where anarchist in nature where by most folk who never read a word of anarchist theory in their life!
FacultyZ 2 years ago 13
"people are violent by nature"
I don't see how this would be an argument against anarchism but rather an argument against government itself. If people are violent by nature, surely you don't want to give a small group of people a monopoly of power and force, i.e the government. Non-sense.
GrandDaddyLL 2 years ago
:) good job, i'm a teenage girl activist too, so you're not alone. read some alan moore comics, they're more help on explaining anarchy. i'm happy that you have faith in humanity too!
cindy2emy 2 years ago
goodjob!
doetinchembohmer 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
your a dumb bitch
Madzola 2 years ago
*you're
ljhop 2 years ago 2
you're a dumb bitch ^
cindy2emy 2 years ago
damit i would have liked to grow up with ya...
like ur mind and face. yea ur cute
alienandroid2012 2 years ago
i like it keep spreding those ideas
no country
no god
no law
but conscience
beltrandavid1970 2 years ago
people are violent by nature. <--- wouldn't agree with this assertion. Most people are NOT violent. That's an observation and it is a fact. How many times in your life you are acting violently ? I guess, very very rarely.
MaikUniversum 2 years ago
I dont quite get why everyone jumps to stariotypical conclusions of political ideoligies like Marxism or Anarchism instead of looking it up themselves or reaserching it?
elizzard45 2 years ago
Hey girl might i say, your gorgeous, and i too am an anarchist, i steal, i smoke weed, i do what the fuck i want when i want, fuck the law, and if thats what your into then fuck these haters let em talk shit but they can burn in hell
KiiiNGzFoRLiiFe 2 years ago
@KiiiNGzFoRLiiFe
Dude I really think you are missing the entire point of the movement. The part of you that makes you steal, smoke weed, and what ever else you do is a side of you that you will soon out grow. The want for true freedom from the laws and athority that is not your own, that is what makes you an anarchist my friend.
Jared63b 2 years ago
You're young... i know you probably hate hearing that but.. i wikipedia a LOT of things.. just please.. please dont wikipedia more complex things like anarchy and things because you are going to get a lot of.. bias.. basically because of how easy it is to manipulate wikipedia. these people who say anarchy = chaos.. of course thats a matter of perspective, thats one of the things you need to research (FURTHER than wiki) and please, by all means get back to me, would love to hear what you learn.
13377r3331f 2 years ago
people are violent by nature.
it isn't good to disarm the GOOD people and let the criminals run riot as they do now!!! EVERYONE should be armed and capable of self defense for a start. The state doesnt allow us to carry weapons, yet people still get stabbed and shot by scumbags on the streets....
when people are armed, it breeds respect.
TheWiretap 2 years ago
anarchism works as a way of life.
TheWiretap 2 years ago
honey, I like your views. It's good to see real anarchists out there, instead of everyone in their little "punk" phase wearing anarchist signs and not understanding a thing about it.
I really do respect you and your views.
You're a smart girl.
MandyJuggalette 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Great video, but you should be a minarchist instead. Check out minarchyunited (dot) blogspot (dot) com to see why
Keiseroll 2 years ago
lol she said my name "Aaron"
i was reading the comments and once she said my name,i said "huh" lmao xD
posc323 2 years ago
LOL =)) she called you coz you were not paying attention and u were reading comments! :P PAY ATTENTION! :))))
AFANARCHIST 2 years ago
The bottom line is: Even if you want to be peaceful and shit, you aren't everybody. Anarchy can only end it chaos. Other people will take advantage of the freedom. Government owned jails will be emptied, and criminals will fill the streets. Your little group of peaceful people will get run over.
RealMetalknux 2 years ago
How can there be jails if there are no police? Fail. And not all crimes are based on greed. If I'm fucked in the head, and I want to go on a killing spree, I will, because there are no police. And I could form a group of murderers and rapists to help. And I'm pretty sure a bunch of psychotic murderers could take on a bunch of overweight hot topic shopping angsty teens like you.
RealMetalknux 2 years ago
okay, so.. you clearly don't understand.
You're profiling too.
"overweight hot topic shopping angsty teens" ?
you clearly don't understand.
If you go on a killing spree.. you will get killed.
There would be no justice like there is now.. if you go on a killing spree, you won't get placed in a prison cell for years, you'll die.
and please don't profile us.
check out some john zerzan. He's an anarchist.. and he's not an "overweight hot topic shopping angsty teen"
and please grow up.
MandyJuggalette 2 years ago
would have been better using your own feelings and conceptions of anarchy! We all know that anarchy in the end is having a utopian state but unfortunately it is an impossible dream as human nature create leaders and rulers.
nscouch 2 years ago
state is chaos, and it is theft and force at the margins, authoritarian abuse and coercion. and anarchists are the people who see the this as opposed to people like realmetalknux who are blinded by the misconception that anarchy means no laws or police systems.
ASubHumanOfSociety 2 years ago
Dispelling the misconceptions.. .good video.
jonnniefivemiles 2 years ago
And everybody acquires knowledge through the internet. Why doesn't anyone read a book? But yes, you're correct.
Bob1agis 2 years ago
If you want to go to her house 'RealMetalknux' then the people who's solidarity and strength just overthrew your government will be waiting...
MrPostCollapse 2 years ago 2
when will you post another video
CALtheANARCHIST 2 years ago
u r so awsome, anarkists has helped katrina victims more than the red cross. so, yeah u r kickass.
CALtheANARCHIST 2 years ago
thank u for explaing anarckist. i strongly surpoert green anarchism. and i suport all forms of anarckism. so rock on
airrowsmith 2 years ago
lol. grow up, stupid.
panicOj 2 years ago
If the government and police ever get removed from society, I will personally come to your house, beat you, and rape you. And there will be no police system to stop me or try to exact justice on me. If you come back for revenge, I'll kill you. Sounds like a great society, huh? And reading some words off wikipedia makes a terrible argument. Sorry if I seem really harsh, but I'm looking for a plausible reason why anarchy could possibly be good, and I can't find one.
RealMetalknux 2 years ago
try looking through videos from auamoti and confederalsocialist. and junior00bacon00chee, you won't have trouble seeing plausible reasons smack you in the face and rape you. this girl's got more real brains than you do, honestly.
ASubHumanOfSociety 2 years ago
im of greek decent and i agree with my fellow brothern MRGREEKPATRIOT, ide say ima modernday anarchist and wud only due a peaceful "RIOT", but if extreme measures are needed then i say givem hell!, down with capitalism!!!
MMANARCHY 2 years ago
I am fascist and I would like to fuck you and scrap the swastica upon you. You fucked up my country
MrGreekPatriot 2 years ago
fuck off fascist..i'll take the shit out of you
eisai kai ellinas kariolh
paliofasista gamimene
Bromoteknada 2 years ago
Wow I am so scared!!!
Aei gamisou anthelliniko skouliki. Kaneis rezili tin Ellada poutanogere
MrGreekPatriot 2 years ago
egw re mouni 'h esy pou tin katastrefeis kai kala sto onoma ths patridas?
kammene egkefale.
FASCIST IS THE FASTEST ANIMAL ON THE PLANET
Bromoteknada 2 years ago
kita tora, eseis pou kete simees paliomouna...
YOU WILL END UP SOAP SOON.
MrGreekPatriot 2 years ago
oi xores den katastrefontai epeidi kaigontai merikes simaies..
oi xores katastrefontai otan yparxoun kammenoi,syntiritikoi eggefaloi,pou oudemia sxesi exoun me tin arxaia ellada kai ton xristianismo pou kai kala agapoun.
olo logia eiste..apo nionio miden.
Ela na me kaneis sapouni kai tha pas apo konserva kai meta stous pappoudes sou stin pigada tou meligala,malaka..vgalane kai glosa oi fasistes aptis trypes tous..
(A)NTIFA
Bromoteknada 2 years ago
file,xeston ton malaka mazi me tin pareoula tou,exoune meinei se nazistika ideodi,den exoun eleftheria mesa tous,oute kan diavazoun istoria,o sydiritismos skotonei...
charmingdiabolo 2 years ago
Fascism is the lowest form of authoritarian rule. Also, your supremacist ideals are stupid. You and you're kind are a disease to humanity.
----------------(A)---------------------------
HailRasec 2 years ago
i hate bullshit. authority has no use in society, all it does is make eople full of shit. im tired of everyone thinkng anarchy is just complete chaos.
CALtheANARCHIST 2 years ago 2
cunt
MrGreekPatriot 2 years ago
The "characteristics features of Capitalism" are not arson or robbery.
Capitalism is free trade, free market.
Anarchy is Capitalist in itself.
Anarchy is the lack of rulers, lack of controling entities.
The market being free is able to regulate itself via provider/consumer interaction.
...Damn this video is OLD! 2006
asperin 2 years ago
"Your comment lacks any coherent logic.".......So what in the hell is logical about having a people set aside to make decisions for you (i.e. the government)??????? (and I probably know more about the government than you ever will)
CarlJohnDavison 2 years ago
awe i just wanna cause chaos and destroy peoples lives cause i hate eveyone fuck all of you
Hizokua 2 years ago
I am anarcho christian and anarcho primitivist :) anarchists are not hooligans, but real anarchists are tottaly different, they are mostly peacefull protesters!! people usualy mistake us fot those hooligans wearing masks an stuf like that
take care annisae
gggrzesiek 2 years ago
Kropotkin preferred the red flag.
anarksee 3 years ago
you are gorgeous!
anarchism 3 years ago
Ah, one moer idiot in the world I know about. It makes me feel good inside knowing there are so many dummies around.
YellowMagi 3 years ago
You seemed to misspell more and incorrectly used the English language. There is no need for a comma.
Honorsucks 2 years ago
Pointing out grammar mistakes, are we? As long the semantics are all right, who cares about the grammar?
I hope you have better things to do on your spare time.
YellowMagi 2 years ago
"Im not saying Anarchy is possible. Im not saying that its like totally impossible".
I do not listen to people who does not listen to themselves. Nonsense and humbug.
YellowMagi 3 years ago
Ted Bundy, Jeffery Dahmer, and Adolf Hitler listened to themselves too. Did you want to listen to them ???
evelsteev 2 years ago
Your reply lacks understanding.
YellowMagi 2 years ago
Your comment lacks any coherent logic.
evelsteev 2 years ago
Perhaps someone have troubles seing the simplest things.
YellowMagi 2 years ago
Not at all. It's more like your logic is flawed. End of story.
evelsteev 2 years ago
i agree completely with you.
people can be very misguided about this.
AltheAwesome333 3 years ago
She is one pretty anarchist, which is great, we need more hot anarchist women !
slckr80s 3 years ago
the point of chaos is in anarchy is to get the changes we need
kellycastle 3 years ago
ah but it does actually derive from the Greek word cant remember it right now, but the Greek meaning actually means chaos, torment and destruction to a higher authority such as government, or even your school principal. And also, don't believe everything on the internet, most of its bullshit.
thephantomsopera 3 years ago
in greek anarchy just means "without rulers"
capelarder 2 years ago
anarchism is possible, plain and simple we feel it through our vains when we are younger as we get older ( speeking for mass not on personal levels ) we become confused and give up, thus conforming but by nature humans are anarchistic, our enemys are now just confused, un open to the philosophy of anarchism, and thus conform and the system contenues, all we are missing is mass informing of well, the mass
AnarchistCommunity 3 years ago
Anarchism is a great idea, if it would've worked. Pretty much like communism. Anarchism and theoritical communism is almost the same thing in my opinion
YellowMagi 3 years ago
Anarchism is activism. Direct action. You can't be an anarchist and sit on your ass. It's listening to Against Me!'s "Baby, I'm an Anarchist," and claiming that you are one all of a sudden. It is process, definitely not something you can become in a day and not a cool term to throw around like those lame hipsters. It's throwing out all ideas about hierarchy and stepping up and acting on what you believe in, and creating that better world you know is possible.
DavesWaveHouse 3 years ago
mele sračky a divně vrní!:D
lukaneta 3 years ago
Anarchy is a tool that an anarchist can use to achive his or her anarchism goal. It is not the end solution but a means to the solution.
defiythelie 3 years ago