Added: 2 years ago
From: truthdefender1
Views: 13,167
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (185)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • go fuck yourself with anything about Obama,, everything else is in order,, as I all see is white,, and Black says all should get medical care from that person we dont trust -- fuck ass

  • @avatarstore love your language. do you have a mirror?

  • - Gore and Crow are perfect examples

    - Perhaps it's not hypocrisy in this case, just stupidy replacing hard work intelligence and committment

    - Wrong, liberals fear what the liberal strategists tell them to fear

    - Check your facts on marijuana

    - Ask Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn and the other liberal domestic terrorists what they want to do to patriots and soldiers

    Are you 6? You try to sound intelligent and enlightened. Good luck with that

  • - Gore and Crow are politically irrelevant.

    - What was the hypocrisy example inherent in the juxtaposing of Rosie the Riviter and Rosie O' Donnell? I don't see it.

    - Liberals generally fear terrorists and do not fear people of faith, but they do fear theocracies.

    - There isn't a single person who has died from marijuana. Tobacco is a different story.

    - Obamacare didn't remove private doctors from practicing. This is an erroneous insinuation.

    - Liberals hang soldiers? Are you 12?

  • Four more years of Obummer and America is done, stick a fork in it.

  • what is the name of the miss. california at 2:13?

  • This simple, late semester thinking deconstruction of liberalism is quite a laugh. The cognitive dissonance that conservatives - and of course christians to no lesser extent - have to face every day of their lives makes one wonder how they manage to put their shoes on.

  • i LOVE the comment "liberals suck ass". A perfect display of the ignorance tearing this country apart. The religious right (whose answer for everything is "god's will" and if you don't agree you are too stupid to have a choice) has had its IQ lowered for decades by the constant raping of public education creating a nation of sheeple who follow the commands of their priests/preachers/pastors/pedo­philes EVEN when they are directly opposed to the interests of the congregants. Voting "R" = RUIN!

  • This is a great video. Who gives a fuck if Obama takes credit for things he didn't do and blames bad things on that poor retard Geee Dubbya. Why is Obama allowed to pick on retards and I'm not. So lame! Taking my right to choose is socialism no matter how you slice it, it all comes down to how much socialism are we willing to accept. There is not such thing as a purely Capitalist or purely Socialist government, only varying degrees on either side. Thumbs up on this video

  • Note the posts of Liberals. They seem to use a lot of VERBS and never use facts. They love shooting the messenger and rarely question their own governments action or lack of. They must love the Change since Nancy Pelosi took over in Jan 2007.

  • @wsoxman 22 out of 30 terrorist leaders killed by Obama. hows that for fact. Oh and I should mention he ended the war put in place by the greedy leader who makes all you guys wet, because he is one of the most right wing, racist fucks out their.

  • @briy123 So Obama was like Rambo and killed the bad guys? You lefties are reaching for anything. Try our Arm Forces. Fact is THE 2007 SURGE that Obama voted against, is what turn the war around. PS Troops may leave, but that doesn't end the treat to our country. And what is with the "Race Card"? Yet another BS to misdirect that the American People don't like the policies.

  • @briy123 You sir are a troglodyte

  • EXTREME Stupidity + TOTAL Hypocrisy = Typical (ignorant) CONservaTARD-RepubliCON Moron

    TEA-BAGGERS: Uneducated bigoted perverts who ENJOY looking at recent STILL PHOTOS of MisHell "Bat-Crazy" BACHMANN & Gov pRick "Oops" PERRY devouring LARGE Corn-Dogs whole, while holding MISSPELLED signs against their sore chins.

  • @ScarahPhalin you are a fucking douche

  • great video. liberals suck ass.

  • They want choice for murdering babies but not for educating them.

    They condemn foreign invasions from centuries ago, but not the one right in front of them.

    They wanted us to get over 9/11, but drone on about slavery and native displacement.

    They accuse you of stealing land from natives. You, not themselves.

    Christianity is "rammed down your throat", but liberal ideology in public schools is "education".

    They're scarred by the Crusades, but not the Cultural Revolution, gulags, or pogroms.

  • Spot on! For years I tried to figure out why Liberals like to murder babies yet protect murderers. Why they love an obnoxious whore like Madonna but hate someone with morals like Miss California. All Liberals care about is wallowing in their own shit while throwing it at everyone else and hating those of us who don't wish to descend to their level.

  • @AtheismKills Liberals don't reason; they think with rhetoric. Bring up any topic and see how easy it is to predict what they'll say.

    Bring up Gov. Walker in Wisconsin and they'll talk about "Kochpublicans".

    Defend a free market institution and they'll accuse you of being paid by them.

    Bring up illegal immigration and they'll bring up white settlement.

    Defend conceal and carry and they'll bring up the "wild West".

    Automatic responses like that come from people who don't think.

  • dosent tell the hole story does it

  • Nice vid......You guys keep the change and lies, I will handle Miss Cali. at the end......

  • this video is fucking retarded. Propaganda at it's finest. Losers.

  • If Cheryl uses only one square- her motor ain't clean.

  • RIGHT WING LIES AND GARBAGE

  • @blackazzman i didn't see any lies, what was a lie? looks like something that would anger a liberal cause they know it's right

  • @383man Trolololol

  • @xxMrFablexx im rubber and your glue and such

  • @383man K

  • i lke the song

  • Very good, its great!!

  • half of this video was interesting, the other half is lies or misconstrued. I'm not a liberal and think this video sucks.

  • If you sit home waiting your turn you deserve to have your gun taken from your cold dead hands.

    The Founders didn’t wait for the Brits to knock down their doors. They gathered at the green and stood up like men and they killed government employees all the way back to Boston.

    What will you do when it’s time to hunt NWO hacks, republicrats and commies(“Liberals” and ‘progressives’)?

    Don't understand? Follow my links. Read the quotes page first. Then read my column ‘Prepping for Slavery’

  • it takes a Carter to get a Reagan.com

  • You left out the word, Retarded

    --as in Retarded Liberal Zombies

  • Sheryl Crow sells millions of CD's? Like, even if she was still popular, which she's not, don't most people just use iTunes and torrents nowadays? Weak example.

  • Good illustration on the mental illness of liberalism

  • loser

  • Pretty funny, but much of it is begging the question and stretched to fit an agenda. I give it a B.

  • @TheRationalBeing Actually, apart from the "Rosie" comment, the rest is a pretty good representation of the rank hypocrisy of liberals. Yes, there is an agenda, but the agenda is to show liberal hypocrisy, and i don't think anything has been "stretched" to prove it. If anything, I think the vid is a bit too generous.

  • @Donnievil So liberals don't trust the doctors with our health? That's a lie. We don't trust insurance companies with our health. The Wasteboro baptist people protesting at the funerals of soldiers are as conservative and right wing as they come. I don't burn effigies of soldiers, if anything I'll burn an effigy of the politicians who started the war. Liberals aren't the only ones who use government loans to pay for college. My kids public school is great. Madonna is no role model.

  • @TheRationalBeing Now we're touting out straw men I see. I don't have time or space to deal with every little issue you try to bring up. Obviously the video deals with some specific examples that typify liberal thought and policy. Yes, there are those who don't fit into this model just as there are those who are conservative who are embarrassing as well. BTW you should make the distinction b/w political and moral right wing.

  • @TheRationalBeing Actually... The Fred Phelps and his church is a liberal organization. sorry but it is very true.

    Phelps has run in various Kansas Democratic Party primaries five times, but has never won. These included races for governor in 1990, 1994, and 1998, receiving about 15 percent of the vote in 1998.[32] In the 1992 Democratic Party primary for U.S. Senate, Phelps received 31 percent of the vote.[33] Phelps ran for mayor of Topeka in 1993[34][unreliable source?] and 1997.[35]

  • @EricTF8770 True enough, but his principles and faith are anything but liberal. The man is a strict Calvinist, and still believes in predetermined destiny.

    Anyone can call themselves whatever they like, its their actions that should be judged. Liberal or not, I am not in agreement with his conservative rhetoric.

  • @TheRationalBeing Why do you think gay bashing is conservative? who puts this stuff in your head? do you think ALL conservatives are like this? do you also think ALL conservatives are racist? because I can quote from 150 years worth of history books that will prove that racism and slavery originated from the democrats. please.... political prejudice is not nearly as effective unless you have the proof to back it up.

  • @EricTF8770 No, I don't think that all conservatives are gay bashers, but from my experience a gay basher is almost always a conservative. No, I don't think all conservatives are racist, but from my experience a racist is almost always a conservative. Moral Majority, Reich Wing crap. Sorry to inform you, but your history lesson is trumped by the fact that neither party has the same ideology it followed 150 years ago. They have basically flipped. There's your proof. Look it up.

  • @Donnievil And I don't even know what the hell the last image of Miss Cali is supposed to convey. I'm a liberal, and I stated my case against this video. Its funny, but it is far stretched. Its to bad others can't see this kind of nonsense for what it is, and it comes from both sides, not just the right. Too many people placing the blame on all the wrong things in America as the crooks make out with our billions. Sad Sad.

  • @TheRationalBeing So much to address...so little space...I'll simply ask here where "our billions" come from and what makes them "ours"? Is this a reference to all those evil corporations that provide gainful employment to people and allow a high standard of living? If so i would like to know what makes them crooks? Isn't the definition of a crook someone who takes something that does not rightfully belong to them? Wouldn't that make a high tax gov. the crooks?

  • @Donnievil Actually, I would define a crook as anyone who has taken money from others for personal gain. In trust money was given in hopes for saving our industries, in fear money was given to save American industries and the economy, In reality corporate debt was socialized on the backs of the tax payer. Now the corporate machine is running strong, but the American workers still suffer. This isn't a judgment made by me based on law, this is an opinion based on morality.

  • @TheRationalBeing Are you talking about the bailouts? Because that is a great example of government spending money foolishly. If people want to support a business, then they can buy it's products. capitalism is a 2 way street, if you don't like what someone is wiling to pay you, you can go and get another job somewhere, or even start your own business. Personal gain? That seems poorly defined: a 7 year old cutting grass takes payment for his own personal gain. Is that being a crook?

  • @Donnievil Do you think in this economic environment it is possible for people to just up and quit their jobs if they don't like it? People used to living on $50k a year are being asked to take pay cuts, now there are increased foreclosures and bankruptcies. Understand, those who are asking for these concessions are still profiting, so why ask for them?

    Not buy its products? How about gas? We don't live in a horse and buggy society anymore, this is a necessity and we have no other choice.

  • @TheRationalBeing If someone wants to get used to a certain style of living then yes, their options are limited, but they still have the option to look for other work.

    No other option? What about public transit? Carpooling? Bicycling? Most leftists are always going on about how these are the best options, so why not implement them in your own life?

  • @Donnievil 1) The average commute to work is 16 miles. Public transport doesn't hit all areas. Bicycling that distance doesn't account for rainy days and snow. I do use public transportation, but I also know just cause it works for me it doesn't mean it works for everyone.

  • @Donnievil High government taxes on who? The companies that use the same infrastructure but pay no taxes? Are those the taxes you speak of? From what I've seen, there is plenty of crying about a high tax rate by American corporations, but plenty of foreign companies are ready to invest without bitching. If corporate America wants lower taxes, I say hire people first, show results, and then get a tax break, not the other way around. Its not like they are going broke.

  • @TheRationalBeing You haven't dealt with the first issue of why they should be taxed so highly (if at all) in the first place, and that was the point. You call corporations criminals, but it is the government who takes away people's money, not the corporation. That, according to classical definition, would make the corporation benefactors by providing something, and the government criminals for taking it away.

  • @Donnievil Issue #1: Taxed highly is a comparative statement. Are you comparing our corporate tax rate to those of other countries or the tax rate of the 1950's? If the former is in play, yes, corporate tax rates are lower, but personal taxes are much higher than they are in the United States. So which would you prefer, a higher corporate tax rate and lower personal taxes, or vice versa, or no taxation at all for anyone?

  • @TheRationalBeing Personally, if it were up to me, there would be no income tax. It is a modern convention, is poorly reasoned, poorly handled, has never been fair or helpful to anyone. You seem to be under the impression that somehow taxes across the board need to be at a certain level, but I would disagree. At the very least i would go either flat tax or flat rate tax for everyone and stop punishing the productive.

  • @Donnievil I would never instill a flat tax because it is a regressive tax that would serve to only increase the gap between the rich and poor in this country.

  • @TheRationalBeing Increase the gap? Seriously...you think charging some people half their income doesn't create a gap? You think providing an endless line of entitlements to only certain people doesn't create a gap? The reason that such a gap exists, both economically and socially is precisely because we treat people so differently. The liberal cry is always "equality" but your financial policy certainly doesn't reflect that.

  • @Donnievil Yes, increasing the gap. Actually, no one gets charged half their income, the highest tax is at 35% of gross. Now look at the difference, Person A makes $10m gets taxed 35%, they have $6.5 mil left. Person B makes $100k gets taxed at 28%, they bring home $78k. So your inferring that Person A will stop producing because he is getting taxed more than Person B, thus cutting into his after tax income? I wouldn't, but I sure would like you to think I would. 

  • @TheRationalBeing No, I am suggesting that socially this gives incentive for the "rich" to despise the "less rich" who are essentially taking their money. I am also suggesting that this hits the middle class hardest and removes their incentive to work and be productive, since they can live on welfare and what comes from the "rich". I also want to know what the "rich" have done to incur this debt to society.

  • @Donnievil 2) I agree with your suggested incentive, but don't you think this goes both ways. When 500 people are laid off from a job that some of them have been working at for 20 or more years, and the owners fatten their pockets by making these cuts, don't you think the laid off workers are pissed off? Not to mention every lay off usually is accompanied by people who have to take services from the government in order to make ends meet. Worker, Gov both get screwed, business walks richer.

  • @Donnievil Another thing to add is this. The Person A spends $1.2mil on living expenses, while Person B spends $75k. Into savings: Person A $5.3 mil, Person B $3k. You don't see how that could equate to increasing the gap?

    Entitlements, that old metaphor for wrecking the economy. We spend $3 on welfare for the corporations to every $1 on social programs. Why not cut those entitlements? You want the ones for the poor cut but you feel its good policy to give a billionaire a $2bil break?

  • @TheRationalBeing Re: your first point, what actual data backs this up?

    Re: your second, I'm against all entitlement spending; including a gov. sponsored pension that pays to the wealthiest as well as the poorest. I'm for living within your means and having social accountability as well as individual freedom. You work for your money, you keep your money, you're responsible for what you do with your money. And don't presume to lecture me on being poor. Biggest problem is taxes.

  • @Donnievil As far as taxing them higher. Yes, I feel they should. They use American labor (or foreign labor) to produce products that they sell back to Americans. If it wasn't for Americans building their products at a low cost, and Americans ability to purchase the product at high cost, they would be nothing. They use the same infrastructure, laws, and market place we all use. They take tax payer subsidies, yet the biggest pay NO taxes at the end of the year. WTF? That isn't right.

  • @TheRationalBeing First of all, this seems like pretty poor rationale for forcibly taking someone's money, and doesn't seem to do anything except punish the productive. In regards to them paying no tax at all, I would first of all ask where you get this info from, then are you talking individually or corporately? And on what grounds are you talking about right? How would you define right from wrong here?

  • @Donnievil As far as not paying taxes, I am speaking of companies like GE, and Exxon, who this year grossed record profits, paid nothing in taxes, and took tax money from our system in the form of subsidies. There are many more stories such as these two. Individuals also get out of paying taxes, the poor usually get money back they did not put in to the system, and the wealthy have ways around paying taxes. I hope you don't need a lesson in this. It would take to many paragraphs.

  • @TheRationalBeing And because corporations face such high taxes, they are willing to spend a lot of money to avoid them as much as possible. When facing tens of millions in taxes, it makes sense to pay millions to avoid them. Decrease the taxes and you make it less lucrative to spend large $ to avoid taxes.

  • @Donnievil The taxes for these corporations has been decreasing, for over 40 years. They used to get taxed at 90%. So while taxes have been decreasing, so have jobs. What I'm calling for is job creation before tax break. Earn it before you get it, not after.

    I'm not against profits, but I am against giving my tax dollars to someone who netted $14.2bil in profits and didn't pay any taxes.

  • @TheRationalBeing You're confusing tax breaks with tax gifts. Other than a bailout situation (which I oppose) when have you "given" tax money to a corporation? Allowing someone to keep the money they have worked for is not "giving" them anything; it is simply not taking it from them. And forcibly taking something from someone is usually called "theft", which I think is where this conversation started.

  • @Donnievil Sure, you can suggest they get a job, but when business isn't hiring, as is the case now, what are they to do? Work two jobs? Three? Don't you think its a little fucked up when the "greatest country in the world" has people who work full time jobs still living in poverty? When 50 million don't have insurance, and 50 million more are under insured with high deductibles, yet the insurance industry rakes in record profits every time they cut people from plans and raise rates?

  • @TheRationalBeing First off, this is irrelevant to the fact that people have a choice, however limited those choices may be. typically the leftist option is that everyone works for the government, which leaves no options.

    Of the 50 mil w/o insurance, how many do you think don't want insurance? If i didn't have to have car insurance, I wouldn't. All you're doing is whining about someone else's success and examples that you don't like. Can you even tell me why any of this is wrong?

  • @Donnievil For one, it is not irrelevant. Yes, people want a health care option that is affordable. Your example of car insurance is like apples to oranges, an in-adamant object compared to a humans health. If I can't afford a yacht, I don't give a shit, but if I can't afford to go to the doctor when I get the flu, and it turns into pneumonia, then its a problem. This is nothing but a moral argument. I believe people should have health care, you think fuck em if they can't afford it.

  • @TheRationalBeing If people want something, then they are capable of creating it. And where were we talking about health care? You can't defend one issue so you move to another?

    If you want a yacht, you can save for a yacht. You want to go to the Dr. then tell the government to stop taking your money. Stupid lefty argument is that I can't afford anything so the government should run it...but they're the reason you can't afford it in the first place.

  • @Donnievil The subject of health care was brought up on your premise that "we all have options". I was using the example to show that, NO, we all don't have the same options. You are under the opinion that we all have the same chances in life to do something, I say we don't. You think that people can just quit a job if they don't like it, and find other work. I call shenanigans because people will work jobs they don't like, and in this economy, changing jobs is not an option for most.

  • @Donnievil How about this, we include a public option, allow the insurance companies to remain in service, and see how it pans out for them. I wouldn't mind paying more in taxes in order for me, and everyone else to have health care.

    Its funny. As bad as so many people have it these days, you argue on the side of individuals who are still profiting. Those poor millionaires who have laid off workers in order to increase the size of their own wallets. Whatever. Have at it.

  • @TheRationalBeing How about if everyone so badly wants a cheaper healthcare plan, one of those liberal elites with lots of money goes and starts one for everyone who wants to take part. Then people who already pay for their own heathcare don't have to pay for someone else's as well?

    And no, I don't argue on the side of those who profit, I argue on the side of those who work for their money and want to keep it. I work for it, it belongs to me, not you or the government. And I don't want yours.

  • @Donnievil That is your answer to a problem that affects all Americans? Seriously? You do realize that we taxpayers pay an extremely high cost for the uninsured already.

    You aren't arguing for the majority of Americans who work their asses off of for sub poverty wages. You are arguing for the person who benefits from these workers. You aren't arguing for those who are laid off and forced to government programs, you are arguing for those who profit at the expense of all Americans.

  • @Donnievil I don't want your money either, nor do I like that I pay taxes, but I do understand that in our capitalist society, there are many who don't have the ability to afford necessities. So I will do my part to ensure that all are taken care of, not just my own greedy ass. Especially those HARD WORKING individuals whose livelihoods have been crushed by someone else in order to make themselves richer. Bottom line, this is a moral argument that will never be answered.

  • @TheRationalBeing Excellent! Then the government can stop taxing me so I can help out my fellow hard working citizens in a practical, accountable manner, rather than with irresponsible government spending. The moral argument is simple, should I have the right to help those in need or does the government have the right to force me to help whoever finds their way into the system? Is it better to help because I want to or because I have no choice?

  • @Donnievil Nope, forced help shouldn't be necessary. If you weren't so worried about yourself, and protecting morally inept corporate America, maybe people wouldn't feel the need for government interference. I help people all the time whether I'm being taxed or not, that is what a true Patriot does, not sit around and make excuses and blame the government for all that is wrong. Regardless of the situation, it is our duty to help all Americans who want to better themselves.

  • @TheRationalBeing Oh goody...an uneducated, biased straw man: since I don't like taxes and don't think every corporation is evil, clearly I never help anyone and only think of myself. A wonderful false dichotomy drawn by liberals...

    I do help people, quite a bit actually. But I could help them MORE if I go to keep more of MY money. That's the POINT. Try to follow one and stop changing the subject.

  • @Donnievil Uneducated? Basically what you made was an "if - then" statement. If the government stops taxing me, then I can help out. However you want to put it, that is what it equivocates to. You also stated that you could help out in a "practical manner" rather than through "irresponsible government spending", which would also leave one to believe that you don't help on your own because the government is taking your taxes and helping for you. All of you say you help. Yeah, whatever.

  • As far as the moral argument. Does one person making $60 mill a year have the right to fire 1000 people in order to make $65mil? How's that for morality? At least the one guy is getting his. The other 1000 possibly are on government programs to make ends meet. That is my POINT! You are arguing for that one guy to keep his money, and then wanting your taxes cut, his taxes cut, and the safety net for the 1000 cut. Jesus would spit on anyone who agreed with this practice.

  • @TheRationalBeing Is it his right? Yes. It is his money, his business, his property, etc. he has the RIGHT in a LEGAL sense to do whatever he wants with it within the confines of the law. Is it RIGHT in a moral sense? Well in your illustration perhaps, if it's really that simple. You have the RIGHT as a consumer to not support his company. If you don't like corporations stop buying their stuff.

    And i suspect you don't know any more about Jesus than Michael Moore does, which is nothing.

  • @Donnievil Is it his right, of course, no one is denying that. Is it right to do is the question I am asking. I love how the argument is "if you don't like it, don't buy it". Well, I don't, and it doesn't stop the fact that my tax money goes toward supporting someone who has more money than I will ever know. Is that alright with you? Is it ok that I am against tax payer money subsidizing the wealthy in this country?

    I know enough about Jesus to know that he would be ashamed of us today.

  • True to form, you didn't even bat an eye or mention the 1000 people that the man put out of work. You didn't even mention the fact that these types of actions are what is increasing the strain on entitlements. You talk about simplicity, yet you avoid the conflict that is created by the actions of those who have the money, property, and businesses. If you don't see how these actions are costing you more money then you are willfully blind and should stop arguing about your money being taken.

  • @TheRationalBeing True to form you oversimplify the circumstances and victimize those who are out of work. What about the business owner who is forced to shut his doors after years of providing gainful employment because he can no longer handle the financial burdens of over taxation?

    You have nothing to say. All you have said is "corporations are bad" "employees are all victims" "we should tax the rich" but "it's all businesses fault when people lose their jobs".

  • @Donnievil I feel for the business owner who is forced to shut his doors. It sucks for him and all the people who worked at the place. STOP DEFLECTING. You know, and I know, that I am talking about businesses WHO ARE DOING FINE, still making profits, and laying people off in order to gain bigger profits.  Why won't you address that? Do you think it is better for 10 men to benefit themselves at the expense of 1000? Taking into consideration that the 1000 have families, we'll call it 4000.

  • Comment removed

  • @TheIrrationalIdiot, Hey pal, can you shutup and read a damn book? Thanks.

  • @Nashhinton Seems like you have a lot to offer. Midget minded fucktard, get a life.

  • @TheIrrationalIdiot, Hey moron, go to your local psychiatric ward. Take a chill pill man.

  • @Nashhinton No worries mate, I just like taking the piss out of fuckers like you. I'm completely sound. Get over yourself.

  • @TheRationalBeing, You too. Take care.

  • My God, this is all fact....oops, did I say "God?"  Oh well, too bad liberals!

  • ALL TRUE STUFF HERE.........

  • Christ... I hope you don't actually believe this...

  • And you'd think stalin or mao killing 6 times more people than hitler would have taught them the lesson..... Looks like europe is starting to fall the way side now. Stay smart America.

  • This should be shown in college classrooms.

  • Pretty good video.

  • I dont care what anyone says...Liberals are Mentally Brain Fucked

  • well youve got to rob peter to pay for pauls education, i mean, if your gonna go by liberal ideaolgy and there perversion of the christain message, youve gotta give liberals credit, stuff like msnbc, you guys have got a voice, and your grabbing immpressionable young children and teens minds to a point where we'll probably have a liberal majority in the next generation, so stop complaining, youll get your chance to see if mass social slavation and finally abolishing religion works

  • @crazyassblinddude There should be one state (it's kind of happening in California, but that's beside the point) where every hard core liberal (Michael Moore, Keith Olberman, Nancy Pelosi, the Obamas, Sean Penn, all ECLU members, Huffington Post writers, etc) moves to, secedes from the union, and begins their own government based on all of their ideologies. Then the other 49 states can see how that all plays out, and we can all learn one heck of a lesson when it's all said and done.

  • @pujols37105 theres a place where liberal ideology already is pretty standard and the bible is pretty much going taboo rapidily, thatd be.oh i dont know..canada? maybe anyone that hates capitalism and hates all the freedoms we have here..maybe go live in canada? i mean its right there and it comes preloaded with almost all the policys and idea a liberal could want, and the people their already hate america, it just seems easier than trying to install all that here

  • @crazyassblinddude Good point. Not only that, but Cuba is only 90 miles away from the southernmost edge of Florida. You would think that would be an example of what our country should be the opposite of, but regardless of how much oppression and bondage exists in that country, you still have many people rocking Che t-shirts and Sean Penn smiling with Fidel Castro in pictures. The far left will never learn any lessons regardless of any facts or proof that's in their face.

  • @pujols37105 well you notice penn, guys like johnny depp, guys like micheal moore, you want to disparage our country at its fundamental levels, but you also dont mind at ALL making your millions through our "evil and oppresive" capatlist system, how can you take an anti american liberal seriously when not only does he not want to or has no desire to work or live elsewhere, but he uses the system he apprantly has such disdain for to get rich off that mmessage, i cant have the respect for that

  • @crazyassblinddude Couldn't have put it any better. My only fear is that's too damn close.

  • oh and i guess the ratings for this video were as bad as the video eh ? oh well atleast ur not like ur nazi friends and disable the comments too, so respect for that atleast ;)

  • lol oh yeah i c liberals saying smoking weed is good for kids all the time.... riiiiiiiight.... lmao.

  • Hahaha this was probably made by some idiotic right wing CHRISTIAN of all things, and THATS the irony in making a video about 'hypocrisy'. You Christfag Neo cons are real scum.

  • @Streetmastaalex Why do you have to be a narrow minded bigot just to tell others that being a narrow minded bigot is wrong?

  • @Streetmastaalex Hey, liberal retard, I thought you were the party of tolerance. Why the hate, huh?

  • This video proved Al Gore was a hypocrite, but how does this reflect all liberals? Didn't he lose the election anyway? And the Democrats have tried several times to pass bills that will either give college students funding or help their situation, but Republican's filibuster it.

  • @SpiderWhiteYT That is total BS about college students! The federal gov't wants to take over all student loans from private lenders. Will they lower rates? Hell NO! They may even increase them so that middle class parents can help fund poorer peoples' college bills. One more redistribution that I canot personally afford!

  • @steeleye65 Except reality contradicts your argument.

  • @SpiderWhiteYT Don't tell me about reality! I have a father-in-law who owes 50K because he cosigned for his idiot stepson. I have 3 kids easily smart enough to jack up the curve in college, and student loans are way harder to get and at a much higher rate than when I went to college. Our F'ing gov't needs to control college tuition costs and health care costs. Ths ignorant bastards refuse to do either!

  • @steeleye65 You have done nothing to actually prove they haven't. The Democrats have made attempts to help College students, but Republicans will and have take means to stop it.

  • @SpiderWhiteYT You have got to be one stupid ignorant fool to believe Democrats want to help college students! Our colleges are expensive because of Liberalism! Why don't you go back to first grade and start over! Oh yea you received your idiotic education in a public school run by the Teachers Union, All Liberal and failing our kids! I paid for my education why should I pay for yours,you lazy ass! Get a job pay your own way!

  • @RURIGHT Ok, explain how Democrats have made colleges more expensive. Also, you contradict yourself, if Democrats don't want to help College kids then why would they make you pay for someone (A college student's)else's education? Are you even aware of what you are saying?

  • @SpiderWhiteYT What he's saying is you should pay for your own damned education. He paid for his own, and doesn't like that liberals want him to pay for some other kid who is likely a prick scumbag. Liberals don't give a damn if you go to college, they're doing that so you'll say "Oh, such a benevolent group of people! I think I'll vote for them so they can continue to pay for my stuff!" They're securing their job via greedy human nature.

  • @greatwhitehunter111 Ok? So, liberals don't give a damn if people go to college yet they want you to pay for someone else to go to College? That..that is stupid. You are an idiot. Don't talk to me anymore.

  • @SpiderWhiteYT Aren't you a typical liberal. You only observe the surface of things. They're buying votes when they do all of these goody hand outs. If you can't grasp the concept of bribery disguised as benevolence, I'd prefer you not talk to ME anymore.

  • don't ya just luv it when europeans deign to criticize us? they have been protected by our airbases since wwii but call us violent, slur our culture while miming it at every chance, mock our greed while recieving aid,call us selfish as we're the first to show and last to leave at every natural disaster,refer to us as repressive while flocking here in ever rising numbers.etc.etc.etc. yep,you shore got us ignernt hillbillies pegged. -p.s.,enjoy the islamic state your enlightenment is allowing.

  • @jr55ful Europe is a mess and the far-right is growing there. They've let millions of people into their continent who want nothing but than to "destroy the evil west"

    The liberals protect these people so there is no way to send them back.

  • yeah seriously marijuana should be legalized as for liberal hypocrisy...

    i believe that every person who is worth millions of dollars will have jets and a huge house..

    i admit though it is hypocrisy..

    but seriously guys i just wanna call out one thing in this video and it is like i said marijuana it is safe.. it will be regulated it will no longer be a gate way drug and it would be a much smarter choice to have it legalized

  • @HeroDanny also the ONLY reason why it isn't legalized is because the tobacco industry is lobbying the politicians (big surprise there)

    and because you nut jobs have 'morals' which go against smoking.. so what? i don't smoke.. never had never will... but i believe everyone should be able to get there own free choice to do it.. and it is not bad for you at all like i said just look up stuff about it. Harvard did a study on it and found out it actually can stunt cancer development, open your eyes

  • Great video.

  • for God sakes, I smoke weed, that doesn't make me a liberal, conservatives can smoke weed too man! It's called freedom.

  • Well done.... and come November, we will see how things go.. I don't think we will be seeing this president a second termnor many of our demo friends... of course, I did not think that we would ever see a protesting draft dodger become president and do it twice! If we all don't vote, America deserves what it gets!

  • Racism! Intolerance! Not seeing the whole picture!

    Left is right! Down is up!

  • @deauvillimus HMMM?

    Just a wild guess , I bet you are a democrate!

    Or if you are to ashamed to admit being a democrate then you can call yourself a lib.

    Either way you are nothing more than one of the blind obama sheeple!

    You rip on FOX , Beck and Palin with only name calling.

    Never any facts, other what you make up in your own little mind.

  • @ekajeht: Nope I am not. I do not call myself anything. I am from Germany and I used to live in Canada for a mere decade. I am following what's going on in the US of A very closely and I must say, I am stunned how poorly educated most of you seem to be. It is beyond me how thinking people could admire idiots like Beck, Palin, Limbaugh, Coulter, Hannity and O'Reilly. We had our fair share of demagogues in the so called Third Reich. But all of them pale in light of yours.

  • @deauvillimus Hey uhm Libtard? Before you label anyone a "simpleton" you might want to get a proper education first. The word you were looking for was "censor" NOT "sensor" dumb-ass.

  • @66shortpants: Before you label anyone a "dumb-ass" you might purchase a brain or find someone to guide you to my channel. There you could see, I am from Germany. I could have responded in German, but I guess it's safe to say then you would have understood even less than you do now. Übrigens: So eine Type wie Du kann mich nicht beleidigen. Selbst wenn Du Dich bemühst. So much for my education.

  • @deauvillimus Liberals are the scum of the earth!

    Die Liberalen sind der Abschaum der Erde!

  • @WatchmenNo1: Selig sind die Schlichten im Geiste. Freundliche Grüße.

  • @WatchmenNo1: Oh yeah: The difference between you and me: You are being loud (your comment indicates that rather strongly). But not necessarily right. And you seem to have a preference for being somewhat narrow-minded. Because you appear to believe, you're always right. Now there you differ from me a great deal.

    Take good care, my good man.

  • There are a lot of valid points in this video but also a lot of arguments that are not valid. As just one example: tobacco is the leading cause of death in the US with 435,000 deaths per year. Marijuana deaths ever: 0. Also, I do not know of any serious marijuana legalization advocate group that recommends making marijuana available to minors. It´s a pity that both sides are more interested in showing that they are right instead of trying to reach some level of understanding.

  • good shit

  • perfect !!! excellent video, it's just a shame that when a liberal see's this they will deny it even though they just watched it.. thats the biggest hypocrisy of all, to deny what is right in front of their face in black and white , color or not to them it simply isn't true..

  • I support many things in this video, but as a strong advocate for criticism, I must point something out. The overwhelming majority of liberals do not believe that marijuana should be sold to kids. Most believe that legalizing it will allow us to regulate it, making it much less likely for kids to get it. They've got a good argument in that department.

    Otherwise, I like your scrutiny, even if I don't adhere to all of it.

  • @skepticaltuber yeha pretty much how they regulate alcohol ,right? that keeps it out of kids hands.. excellent point you bring up.

  • FANTASTIC video

  • No straw man here. I wished it all were straw man arguments, but , sadly and tragically, it is all too true to life. The Left has gone completely insane believing their own infantile fantasies.

  • Very true !

  • strawman and appeal to emotion fallacy

  • Saying that my religion is not AS vile as others doesn't deny that there are disgusting parts of it. Hence why I said not AS vile. ( DUMB...ASS...) I get what's terrible about Christians, not letting women abort, or looking down on gay marriage... Ugh.. that compares to whipping someone to death for revealing your arm hair. I know. I love how people want to prove me wrong, and end up further proving my point. Again, they are too stupid to notice.

  • @ihateneveen Saying that women shouldn't be able to talk unless permitted by a man. Promoting slavery. Condoning the murder of people who work on the supposid sabbath... Should I go on?

  • @Macabre215 Yes, I am aware those things exist, but people only have a seizure about it when it is Christians that do it. When any other religion promotes these things, they get a free pass because they can blame Bush....Don't tell me you actually need examples of this.

  • @ihateneveen The issue with abortion is that pepole think its completely black and white. When it actually has a vast gray area associated with it.

  • I am too stupid for ignoring the veil in Christianity?? LMAO When the fuck did I ever deny that Christianity wasn't perfect? All I am saying lets get mad at all religions equally, and not just focus on the atrocities of one. And what does some dipshit do? Highlight themeanness of Christianity and ignore the more atrocious parts of others? Again, too stupid to notice how they contradict themselves...

  • I don't think any so called liberal can totally agree with anything Al Gore says, nor do we think he isn't a hypocrite. There are hypocrites in all political secs in this nation. To say yours doesn't have it would be as big of a lie as Clinton when he denied having sex with Monica or Paula.

  • Nope, were not In Kansas anymore. We're in a shitty, broke, crime-ridden, decadent, depraved, ignorant, hellhole created by the great liberal revolution. They punish the workers with taxes & reward the lazy welfare shitheads with bigger checks. Isn't the world grand??

  • partisan bs blah blah blah. neocons are the biggest liberals nest to the liberals themselves. the OLD right in america believes in neutrality in foreign affairs. it was the left who always advocated war prior to the 60s-70s. speaking of which i find it funny that prior to that time all of the pro-israel people were commies.

    fuck all liberals and "conservatives". go libertarian!

  • Blah blah blah strawman....

  • this video should be run on all stations every hour on the hour, maybe show all the people the true face of liberalism

  • Thanks for the vid, its nice to see not all ppl are morons:)

  • uhohitsslowchrome,

    The problemis that like so many other Americans, you're a fascist. Your ideals align with fascism but you don't like the word "fascist". So you bullshit yourself into believing you can hold ideals contrary to those of the founding fathers and still be a patriot. It doesn't work that way. If you cling to fascist views you're a fascist. So live with the title you've earned for yourself. The founding fathers said freedom of speech "shall NOT be abridged". It means what it says.

  • If Christianity and Islam were equally vile, why do we get excoriated for the things they get VICTIMIZED for?? Obvioulsy, there is a freaking difference. Of course Liberal asswipes are too stupid to notice the disparity

  • Actually you are too stupid to notice that there is a lot of evil in Christianity. You're right there is a difference and all religions aren't equally vile, but you ignore the disgusting side of your own.

  • @Macabre215 Stop looking into what as NOT said retard.

  • uhohitsslowchrome,

    You think the founding fathers didn't prohibit ANY sensorship? What do you think free speech is all about? The 1st amendment states, "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech". Read that. Now read it again, and again if necessary. That's a prohibition against the censorship of verbalizations. It's no wonder you're so messed up. You haven't a clue what rights and freedoms the country was founded upon!

  • uhohitsslowchrome,

    I never said liberals are more conservative. Those are your words, not mine. What I said was that the founding fathers put an absolute prohibition on ANY censorship and people today are outraged if things aren't censored to their perception of political correctness (which means, "other than correct" or we wouldn't need the word "political"). Most Americans now hate true freedom, though they're too stupid to realize that.

  • @uhohitsslowchrome,

    No, the founding fathers would most certainly not agree with today's liberals because today's liberals are far more conservative than the founding fathers. The founding fathers didn't believe any level of censorship was constructive or safe. Even today's liberals tend to be offended if television isn't heavily censored (as an example), rather than the offense we should find in seeing that our civil rights are blatantly violated through the censoring of television, etc.