I think many more people could learn to appreciate the greatness of music if it were presented in a way that they could more easily relate to. What a horrible thing that with all the wonderful music there is that most people are happy just listening to trash!
Of course it is very very important to preserve the traditional as a frame of reference. In my mind the early musicians were far more disciplined, knowledgeable and skilled than their modern day counterparts.
I love hearing different interpretations of great music! Who is to say what's right? Who knows what the masters would have thought of an electric violin and different rhythm for example?
It's pretty far from "original Bach" to my ears, particularly in the way Zehatmair excessively tinkers with the rhythm. It makes for a more unique interpretation but also breaks the flow of the phrasing. For example, George Enescu talked about there being a "pulse" in Bach's music, like an unwavering heartbeat. The playing is interesting and worth listening to but more novelty than the heartfelt introspection the Chaconne calls for.
I liked the lack of drama, perpetual motion, and steadiness--without losing too much substance. Interesting, and I think, hypothesize, possibly closer to Bach than meets the eye.
Whenever I hear Zehetmair, I think "thank God, I'm tired of hearing everyone else play it the same damn way"
chessmeister 1 month ago
obviously, nazis don't have the apropiate vision to understand art and respect enough... at least to put aside thrier ridiculous impulses
tudoryka79 1 year ago
I think many more people could learn to appreciate the greatness of music if it were presented in a way that they could more easily relate to. What a horrible thing that with all the wonderful music there is that most people are happy just listening to trash!
supercalifragelistik 1 year ago
Of course it is very very important to preserve the traditional as a frame of reference. In my mind the early musicians were far more disciplined, knowledgeable and skilled than their modern day counterparts.
supercalifragelistik 1 year ago
I love hearing different interpretations of great music! Who is to say what's right? Who knows what the masters would have thought of an electric violin and different rhythm for example?
supercalifragelistik 1 year ago
It's pretty far from "original Bach" to my ears, particularly in the way Zehatmair excessively tinkers with the rhythm. It makes for a more unique interpretation but also breaks the flow of the phrasing. For example, George Enescu talked about there being a "pulse" in Bach's music, like an unwavering heartbeat. The playing is interesting and worth listening to but more novelty than the heartfelt introspection the Chaconne calls for.
aimson 1 year ago 3
Wow he plays the arpeggios like bach wrote them, to be improvised
Tonys714 1 year ago
He is making fun of chaconna and Bach himself...ridiculous.
jasonform 2 years ago
you are more ridiculous in commenting in this way.
china008 2 years ago
please upload more of him...never heard more interesting performance of Chaconne
feanorsre 3 years ago
Brought tears to my eyes. Is this from his Teldec recording? If so, I must procure it.
morindhe 3 years ago 2
Yes, this is the TELDEC recording.
SCH0P3NHAU3R 3 years ago
I liked the lack of drama, perpetual motion, and steadiness--without losing too much substance. Interesting, and I think, hypothesize, possibly closer to Bach than meets the eye.
zeagle79 3 years ago 8
Brilliant performance.... Bravo
guarneri20 3 years ago 3
Quite different and very enjoyable. Bravo!!!
mexindian1 3 years ago 3
Thank you!
JaredIsrael 3 years ago 3
a very unique interpretation!
AlembicWelkin 3 years ago 4
thanks!
wrybosome 4 years ago 5