Added: 1 month ago
From: RickSantorum
Views: 25,719
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (630)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Ta-da! I identified this as production music, and today I've found the track. It's from the Network Music production library.

  • I'M A RON PAUL SUPPORTER. But if those of you claiming to support Ron Paul think you're going to help Ron Paul by bashing Santorum on his bold stance for Conservative, family values, you might as well forget about it.

  • Hah, Santorum allowed comments on his videos. I wonder how long this will last?

  • Wow Santorum, trying to get people to belive you were in the military by saying you served in the "Armed Services for 8 years". That is just PATHETIC. Un fucking beliveable. Shame on you Rick. You know what you are doing. You are trying to play on people's ignorance by saying that without lying since you served in the Armed Services COMMITTEE of the SENATE. You were never a member of the military, yet you are trying to get people to think you were.

  • What a joke Rick Santorum is not a Veteran people he only Served on the Armed Services Committee, a Tea Party Favorite? if Santorum was a Tea part favorite then tell me why has Santorum criticized the tea party just not a while back?

    Santorum has stated he hates freedom, yet while he was in NH on a video footage he was shown that he for the SOPA act, before going against it.

    Santorum was voted out by voters in PA.

  • What's a santorum?

  • 8 years on Armed Services.......

    Santorum indeed. Frothy shit stain.

  • I LAUGHED THE WHOLE TIME!!!

    Rick criticizes the Tea Party, expanded welfare, did not serve in the military, called himself a "progressive conservative" in his 1990 campaign, and he was rated the most corrupt senator while in office.

    LIES, LIES, LIES

  • What a piece of shit.

  • SERVED 8 YEARS ARE YOU KIDDING ME?! HOW DARE YOU STEAL SOMETHING LIKE THAT FROM OUR TROOPS! YOU HAVE NEVER SERVED A SINGLE DAY IN UNIFORM BEING TOLD WHEN TO SHIT WHEN TO EAT SO DON'T EVER, EVER, CLAIM TO BE A SOLDIER WHEN YOU ARE NOT!

  • Ol' Frothy's at it again...

  • Wait, over 100 agrees - were are the douche bags who like this video and support Santorum? Why aren't they commenting on his amazing policies and everything - I want to hear a mentally retard person explain this to me because only a mentally retarded person would be following this.

  • Served 8 years? HAHAHAHAHAHA

    Remember when Paul got on stage and said "I'm the only veteran on the stage" and no one corrected him? Ya.

    Santorum approves the lies in this message and voting for him assures me that you are into his lies and are probably someone that most do not want to be around because not only are you a religious twat, you're fucking stupid and dishonest.

  • No I know why Santorum was voted on e of the most corrupt politicians in Washington! Trying to deceive people into thinking he served for 8 years in the Armed Forces is lower than low. Santorum is a chicken-hawk and nothing more.

  • whut?

  • No, no, no. It says he served ON the armed forces not IN the armed forces. He probably did fundraising or some useless shit.

  • @wingman2k This was clearly intended to deceive -- though he can claim that he technically told the truth. The full truth would have been to say he served 8 years on the Armed Services Committee -- in the comfort and safety of his armchair -- while he sent other people off to the wars he lusts so hungrily for....

  • I will drink Santorum before I vote for Santorum.

  • "I'm Rick Santorum and i'm a lying Communist Puppet working for Israeli Interest"

    - Paid for by Goldman Sachs

  • Almost as Bad as Rick Perry's ad .... almost

  • santorum (san-TOR-um) n. 1. The frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the by-product of anal sex.

  • "Tough on Corruption..."

    "Santorum Named "Most Corrupt" Senator by Watchdog Group in 2006

  • It's interesting to hear that Rick Santorum is a favorite of the Tea Party considering he speaks negatively of the Tea Party and Libertarian movements. He received nearly $500,000 in lobbyist funds in 2006 (more than any other candidate from any party running for any office that year). Sounds like the anti-corruption guy the Tea Party should rally around (even though he despises them)...

  • What a douchebag!!!

  • Santorum never served in the military, his ad is an intentional misleading LIE!!!

  • this man was never in the millitary he is a poser and an absolute liar trying to minipulate people into thinking he was in the armed forces and making himself look like a joke

  • Google: Rick Santorum What A Big Government Conservative Looks Like ...and see for yourself how he voted on bills. He isnt what he claims to be.  (Redstate/com)

  • Chickenhawk control freak who wants the government in the citizens bedrooms. What a fool.

  • oh my God America sucks. Santorum?

  • A huge load of BUUULLLL SHIIIIT

  • Hast the best chance to beat Obama. Maybe in Missouri, but nationally he ranks third among the GOP. Served ON the Armed Forces Committee, not in the Armed Forces. Favorite among members of the Tea Party...While that might be true, it's odd considering his stances as Pennsylvania governor. Let us also not forget that he believes the bible trumps the Constitution.

  • They are called chicken hawks, this is the most disrespectful ad I've ever seen, I hope paul calls him out on this.

  • Vets call for Rick Santorum to follow through on his plans to go to war with Iran and demand his son enlist in the military ASAP!

    facebookD0TC0M/pages/Vets-For-­Drafting-John-Santorum/3708628­86274409

    Since Ex Senator Santorum is all about tough talk and endless wars. It is only fitting he should have some skin in the "GAME" and put his son John straight into the hands of this Government. Man up and join.

  • Rick Santorum-"pro-life" and "pro-war" yet cannot see the obvious contradiction. Ready and willing to send your son into a foreign war yet he himself NEVER served. PLEASE check people to find out the TRUTH. If Santorum lies in his campaign rhetoric what do you think this liar will do once in office? If you claim to be a Christian and support this liar because he touts his "faith" then PLEASE research the Christian Just War Principles that our founding fathers adhered to.

  • What a douchebag!

  • Stolen valor is now a FEDERAL CRIME.

    Santorum needs to be put in jail for making the claim that he served.

  • Santorum may be the most power hungry politician alive today. And like the ones before him, he also may wind up as president.

    We need Ron Paul. Peace 2012.

  • Santorum did NOT serve in the military. He served on the Armed Forces committee in the Senate, and he probably took the cushy pension and healthcare that came along with his Senatorship too.

    Way to be a fucking scumbag Santorum, trying to deceive people into thinking you give a shit and can actually empathize with troops getting their legs blown apart.

  • He served on the Senate Armed Services Committee.

  • More like Dick Santorum

  • Do not try to fool the people online with Santorum , this is not Faux news

    The people online are better informed on the issues and that is why

    Ron Paul owns the internet...end the Fed

  • Ron Paul 2012

  • WOW, Really?

    8 years on armed services................. COMMITTEE!!! Do you think they worded it that way without knowing how people would interpret it?

    Dirty deceptive bastards

  • Rick Santorum 2012 : ) NO LIBERTARIANS ALLOWED! Since Ron Paul wants to legalize illegal, I'll be packing my bags if he wins this nomination. Why do you think so many young people are supporting Ron Paul? It's not because he's the best...it's because they want to get high without having to run from law enforcement!

  • If he's the "best" chance for this nation, I just may move to Canada.

  • The accusations made of Santorum 2tear him down - even the ugly lies - pale next 2the massive lists of things ACTUALLY wrong N the records of ALL the rest. He has THE MOST consistently Conservative, Christian, Constitutionalist Record. Even Ron Paul is weak on several Principles our founders said were Vital 4a Republics continued Prosperity &Freedom. Ron Paul is wrong on the 10th Amendment because he DOESNT understand the NECESSITY of Natural Law, or the Hierarchy of Constitutional Authority.

  • #googlesantorum

  • I like Rick Santorum. But he doesn't understand the tenth amendment and foreign policy, so I'll have to vote for Ron Paul

  • Since when did he serve on the armed services?

  • I'm Rick Santorum and I get my foreign policy from comic books.

  • Anyone that says by making gay marriage illegal and abortions of any kind illegal will somehow fix the economy doesn't deserve to even be in the race. The only difference between him and some extremist Muslim is instead of Sharia law, he wants Biblical law imposed on America.

  • ***HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? ***HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? ***HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? ***HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? ***HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? ***HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN? *** HOW ABOUT BUILDING SEVEN?

  • #scum

  • Absolutely disgraceful and deceitful. Armed Services COMMITTEE!

  • At frame :15 he says he served ON armed services, hoping that your brain will turn it into IN. He was never in the military! He only voted to send our brave soldiers INTO WAR. He never WAS one of them. He is a corrupt liar who does not deserve your support. Listen to our actual soldiers and vote Ron Paul!

  • "Served 8 Years on Armed Services" Why the incomplete sentence? You aren't trying to fool people into thinking this guy actually served in the military are you? He served on a cushy committee in D.C. He's a war wimp.

  • @specsaregood And when did spending money to kill people and spend money giving OTHER countries money CONSERVATIVE. how can one say someone who supports so much spending is conservative? WHen did true conservatism not follow the 10 commandments? How can you be a christian and support war?

  • :04 the only way I would EVER let Santorum touch my kid, would be if that kid was a baby goat and it had a bad case of diarrhea. Mark Foley, Jerry Sandusky, Lindsey Graham, Barney Frank, Phil English. Santorum should see if it isn't too late to join the Capitol Hill Basketball League. Let Paterno coach, and he gets sloppy seconds.

  • @thechangeling613 thats Rick's daughter, n00b

  • @themaskedging Oh, you are right. My apologies. Rick and his band of Pedo-Satanists prefer little black boys of Happy Valley crack mamas. No wonder the George Herbert Walker "poppy" Bush Crime Family Syndicate used Pennsylvania for part of their 911 tyranny. This shit has been going on since 1977 in Happy Homo Valley. Unfortunately, innocent children were used like fodder to quench the thirsts of the Sodomites.

  • @thechangeling613 apology accepted

  • Santorum is just another warmongering elitist who would send us into WW3, starting with Iran. how could anyone be stupid enough to even consider voting for this maniac?

  • i love you

  • @musicxcraze your a nutcase

  • rick santorum is prejudiced against gays. he voted to raise the debt ceiling several times and wants a bigger government, despite what he says.

  • @A1pHACHARg3

    Yes, the same way Gays are bigoted and prejudice against all of us bible thumping Holy rollers, who dont see "Eye to Eye" with your interpretation of marriage. It goes both ways.

  • @3544S thats because christianity has caused more pain and death than homosexuality.

  • HA!

  • Why does Rick Santorum always look like he's confused?

  • @SilasticArmourfiend He's trying to keep the santorum inside which makes him physically uncomfortable; often manifesting itself in a confused look on his face.

  • @SilasticArmourfiend

    The same reason Ron Paul looks senile and old- they're both human.

  • I swear this guy is trolling us

  • Yes, Santorum was listed as a Corrupt Politician by a LEFT WING GEORGE SOROS type of organization. Ron Paul is using that left wing organization to attach Santorum. So, calling him corrupt is BS. "Ron Paul" has had left wingers and Ocuupy wallstreet protesters at his events, supporting him! I think Santorum represents the conservative position. If you are in the pot smoking hippies crowd, go vote for Ron Paul. If you want to put this save this country, vote SANTORUM.

  • @3544S Just saw this after I responded to the first one. On corruption: you do realize that Rick Santorum was in charge of the K Street Project which basically merged the Republican party and the lobbyists together? Talk about being the leader of the sellouts.

    The reason RP had "Occupiers" at his events was because RP supports ending corporate subsidies and ending the Fed. RP is also truly incorruptible, something that's also very attractive to Occupiers (and, hopefully, to all of us).

  • @jhbombb

    Rick Santorum was not in charge of the "K Street Project." That title goes to Grover Norquist and Tom Delay. The Washington Post recently investigated this and concluded "We can’t prove definitively whether or not Santorum collaborated on the K Street." So his involvement is speculative at most. Here are the facts, Santorum was a member of the "Gang of 7" which EXPOSED unlawful perks, corruption in the House Banking Scandel and Post Office scandals. He fought Washington Corruption.

  • @3544S And voted to raise the debt ceiling 5 times making government bigger and stronger. 

  • @ryanthomastew

    Yes, voted to raise the debt cieling during war time. He has proposed to cut 5 trillion dollars in 5 years. Cutting a trillion dollars a year, in my opinion is not big government.

  • @3544S So during War Time it's okay to spend beyond our means?

    What about Rick's idea to attack Iran? Will that be a war? Will raising the debt ceiling again be required?

    Santorum has proposed cuts in spending but his own past actions stand in stark contrast with his rhetoric.

    Santorum's actions speak louder than his campaign rhetoric.

  • @jhbombb "truly incorruptible?" Wow, all my respect for your political perspective just flew out the window. I suppose he's some demigod to you, then?

  • @CelticLass94 Paul doesn't talk to lobbyists. He's literally received $201 from lobbyists this campaign cycle. TWO HUNDRED AND ONE DOLLARS. Even congressional whips have stated they don't even bother talking to Paul because he won't waiver on his principles in the name of partisan politics. Yes, that makes him incorruptible. Has he ever flip flopped on anything other than the death penalty in his 30 years in Congress? Go ahead, I'm waiting.

  • @jhbombb You act like you're his advisor. You do know that not EVERYTHING the politicians do is kept in the open? You can't know that Paul is a "saint" unless you have been up close and personal with him. Also, incorruptibility isn't defined by no "flip-flopping." It depends on your morals. He is a libertarian, and in many conservatives' eyes, libertarianism IS corrupted. He believes in political philosophy that takes the laissez-faire system to an extreme level. To me, that's corrupted.

  • @CelticLass94 Corruption doesn't depend on your morals, give me a fucking break. Everything I stated was a fact. Ron Paul has had $200 in donations from lobbyists for the 2012 campaign cycle, he's never flip-flopped, and whips don't bother with him. FACTS. Try to dispute them?

    "I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism" - Ronald Reagan.

  • @jhbombb If you want to keep this going, please try to listen to what I'm saying rather than use vulgar curse words to somehow try to hide that what I said was right. THERE ARE MORALS BEHIND FACTS. Corruption doesn't depend on your morals?WOW. Go look up the philosophy behind corruption, please. How can you define corruption UNLESS you have a moral system? YOU CAN'T! What libertarians see as corrupted politics will be different for me, BECAUSE I HAVE DIFFERENT CONSERVATIVE MORALS.

  • @CelticLass94 Yes, an IMPAIRMENT of morals and values, most often when morals are "sold out" for political reasons. Either the LACKING of morals/values (ie: oppressive military dictatorships), or the SELLING-OUT of morals and values for political gain, or using political power for PERSONAL GAIN. That's a "corrupt politician". Your definition of a corrupt politician as anyone you may disagree with is absolutely ridiculous.

  • @jhbombb Nice ad hominem abusive XD But that won't help you. Think about it. Why do I disagree with them? Because they're old and wrinkly? No. Because they have morals that I think will be a detriment to our government? Um, yeah. Morals = Worldview = Political standpoint = actions in government. This can be said for any politician. Dictators believe that it is morally appropriate to engage in socialism/communism. Obama believes it was morally right to repeal the Mexico City Policy.

  • @CelticLass94 You keep talking about having opposing morals than Dr. Paul. You might THINK he would have a "corruptING influence" on what you would like for America, but you absolutely cannot argue that he's a corrupt politician. Those are two different things.

  • @jhbombb Nice try with the Regan quote. He was a great president and I love him, but I don't have to agree with everything he says, and certainly don't have to agree with his system of political morals. Political "facts" aren't like scientific facts; the two aren't interchangeable. Politics deals with WORLDVIEW, WHICH STEMS FROM MORALS. I DON'T BELIEVE IN RON PAUL BECAUSE LIBERTARIANISM GOES AGAINST MY WORLDVIEW. It's also fact that he wants to legalize drugs.

  • @CelticLass94 Facts are facts. You can't dispute that Paul is incorruptible when it comes to selling out on morals/values, that he's never changed his opinion for some jackass on K-Street, and that he's been consistent for 30 years. THOSE ARE FACTS. Not even the most liberal loon would argue that Paul is corrupt, neither would Rick Santorum.

  • @jhbombb And why can't I dispute that Paul is incorruptible? Because he's stayed consistent? Didn't Gaddafi stay consistent to his political agenda too? Yes. So you're saying that I can't dispute that Paul is incorruptible because of his consistency? So I can't dispute Gaddafi or any other politician because they've stayed loyal to their agenda? Interesting. I believe that is a violation to my right to liberty in my speech.

  • @CelticLass94 Because you make a fundamental mistake in your definition of corrupt. "Political corruption is the use of legislated powers by government officials for illegitimate private gain." It has nothing to do with your worldview vs. another's worldview. I absolutely despise of Dennis Kucinich's domestic policy, and I would never vote for him. But he's not corrupt. Ron Paul might "corrupt" your vision for the country, but that does not make him a corrupt politician.

  • @CelticLass94 Because you make a fundamental mistake in your definition of corrupt. "Political corruption is the use of legislated powers by government officials for illegitimate private gain." It has nothing to do with your worldview vs. another's worldview. I absolutely despise of Dennis Kucinich's domestic policy, and I would never vote for him. But he's not corrupt. Ron Paul might "corrupt" your vision for the country, but that does not make him a corrupt politician.

  • @CelticLass94 Comment system is fucked up and not letting me post longer messages for some reason. Since you have a hidden profile, feel free to PM me if you wish to be further educated.

  • @jhbombb My profile isn't hidden, sweetheart. And no thank you, what you are offering is anarchy-like indoctrination, and I'll pass on that, thanks.

  • @CelticLass94 "This profile is not available". Constitution = anarchy lmfao. This is coming from a Rick Santorum supporter who prefers an American version of an Iran theocracy? Give me a break. I wish you the best in terms of opening up your eyes and thinking for yourself, instead of getting your news from the MSM and supporting a homophobic, racist, fascist fuck like Rick Santorum.

  • @jhbombb I didn't say Paul was an anarchist. I said that YOU are giving anarchy-like indoctrination. lol No, my dear and illogical friend, your own pride and inability to claim yourself to be wrong is the reason why you are so vulgar and mundane. I wish you all the best...maybe XD

  • @CelticLass94 I'm a Constitutionalist, and if you're saying my beliefs are reminiscent of "anarchy", then you're saying the Constitution = anarchy. Damn right I have pride in the Constitution. Sorry if you believe the Constitution to be mundane and anarchist-like.

  • @jhbombb Post shorter, more frequent messages, then. Unless you relinquish your argument.

  • @CelticLass94 I'd love to have a drug legalization debate with you. You'd get destroyed. Not going to do it over the YouTube comment system, the character limit is too constricting.

    The majority of the founding fathers were libertarians; a strict interpretation of the Constitution is a libertarian interpretation. If you believe the Constitution is corrupt, feel free to move.

  • @jhbombb It's also fact that he believes this: "He thinks the Civil Rights Act of 1964, you know that whole equality thing, was a violation of people’s rights and wouldn’t have forced anyone to lift the Jim Crow laws. He called MLKJr day “hate whitey day”. According to Ron Paul supporters, this is OK because he wants to legalize drugs and end the death penalty, both of which would disproportionately go to help black men."

  • @jhbombb And his view of the CIA is based on libertarian nonsense. He and other "libertarians" are so afraid of the rule of big government that he even calls the CIA "a government unto themselves." He furthermore says, "They're in businesses, drug businesses, they take out dictators. We need to take out the CIA." He is so afraid of them causing a uprising against our federal and state governments that he is willing to risk our national security just to "defund the CIA." That is very libertarian.

  • @jhbombb And I don't agree with it because my morals restrict me from seeing eye to eye with what he thinks is morally condign. For example, he sees "taking out the CIA" as morally acceptable because his morals lead him to believe that libertarianism, which is highly against big government, is the best choice of government for mankind's well being. Well, I beg to differ, especially when it comes to national security.

  • @CelticLass94 If you honestly believe he wrote those newsletters you're an idiot. It's been debunked time and time again. He was the publisher of newsletter twenty years ago; he had 4-5 ghost writers and various interns. Racism is a collectivist idea, there is no more anti-collectivist candidate than Ron Paul. Libertarians by definition literally cannot be racists.

  • @jhbombb Wow. You are more debased than I thought. Interesting. lol Show me where they have been debunked, and I will believe you : )

  • @3544S Haha vote Santorum. That's like saying fire is good for your skin. This disgusting POS pig stands 0% chance of ever becoming President.

  • @3544S I am sorry that you still use the FALSE/INCORRECT/DIVIDING LEFT RIGHT PARADIGM. Ron Paul simply wants Americans to be as free as possible, and to have the smallest government possible. Rick Santorum doesn't want either of those, and therefore is one of the many Anti-Freedom/Big government candidates.

  • @libertysam1

    Half of what Ron Paul proposes wont pass congress or the house, so he is a waste of time to elect and will not accomplish anything. Out of 600 proposals he's brought to the table in his 26 year carear, he's only been able to pass one. He is too radical for the American public and will not be able to defeat Obama. Not to mention the guy will be 85 years old at the end of his 2nd term! I wouldnt trust him driving a car, let alone have his finger on the red button.

  • @3544S Hmm maybe because the Congress is bought and sold by corporations and at the same time would never give up an ounce of there power to the American people. So do you support the statists/authoritarians in congress? it sounds like you do. Let me ask you a question. What is the backbone of our economy, the thing you and I use to make our daily transactions in this nation?

  • @libertysam1

    I dont think anyone is happy with Congress and I'm certainly not going to argue with you on that issue. I agree Half of Congress is owned by Corporations and the other half by Labor Unions. I dont think any of our Presidential choices in this election are perfect either. They all have baggage. So its not like we have a ton of choices here. However, in my opinion I like Santorum, because I feel his values resonate with mine and I trust that he will do the right thing.

  • @3544S You forgot to answer my question though. what do we make our daily transactions in? What medium of exchange?

  • @3544S How can someone consider Santorum a fiscal conservative if he voted to raise the debt ceiling FIVE times?

    Why doesn't Santorum understand economic business cycles?

    Why doesn't Santorum understand constitutional Foreign Policy?

    Why doesn't Santorum respect individual liberty and privacy?

    Why doesn't Santorum understand that ALL spending must be curbed at the Federal Level - including Military spending?

    Santorum is awfully clueless on so many subjects it's truly sad.

  • @ryanthomastew

    I consider him a fiscal conservative because he has proposed to cut 5 trillion dollars in just five years. Cutting a trillion dollars a year is not BIG government. Voting to raise the debt cieling during WAR TIME is not an easy choice, but at the time, he did what he thought was right, as did many others. Now we know better and I have great confidence that he will keep his word and cut 5 trillion dollars.

  • @3544S So you're saying Santorum didn't know better back then and he understands it now? Does he not understand that constantly being involved in wars can bankrupt a nation? (Take a look at the USSR - remember them? The last war they were involved with? AFGHANISTAN.) Now Santorum talks about attacking Iran and provoking WWIII.

    Does Santorum listen to other leaders of the world?

    China has stated openly they will back Iran in the event of an attack.

    What do you think that means?

  • An Active Lobbyist And Was Listed as on of the top 3 MOST CORRUPT Members of the Senate Presidential Material. WAKE UP AMERICA There is only 1 Choice Ron Paul A True Conservative and Patriot

  • @GMF14692

    Listed as a corrupt politian by a left wing "George Soros" organization. Sounds like BS to me. The left has been attacking Santorum (just look at some of the comments here). So, if the left attacks him, it must mean he is the RIGHT candidate for the the Job. I'm voting for SANTORUM in 2012.

  • You notice he didn't put any actual claims in here AT ALL. Want to know why? He doesnt want people to learn anything about him. He's seen how the last several people who became frontrunners died off as soon as people actually looked at them, and he knows his message will turn people off faster than a bullet to the light switch, so he's obscuring the facts with the hope he can keep them that way until the nomination.

  • HEIL THE SWASTIKA!

  • Homophobic, idiotic, asshole.

  • Well I guess fapping will be illegal if this scumbag gets elected

  • Man on man! Doggone!

  • We have the right to rebel and create a new government. Vote revolution this year.

  • Everyone flag the video

  • Pffft! Hahahahahahaha!

  • Homophobic, scummy piece of shit.

  • He is made from the pure evil they show in time bandits

  • omg if they retard even gets close to winning the election im moving to a different country. people please learn the facts before voting for this guy

  • @Nickcheese100000

    Like Obama is any better? You should move now.

  • It's a good thing that baby Rick was holding at the end wasn't gay, or being raised by gay parents, otherwise it's childhood would be ruined, and santorum might just have to stop feeding the kid twinkies and start shoving bi-bull down its throat.

  • Anybody who votes santorum is actually insane.

  • Most foreign policy experience?? Yeah, just throw Jon Huntsman's career out of the window as he's a two time ambassador, worked for an international corporation, and as a US trade representative. Tea party favorites lose. Take note from 2010: Sharron Angle, Christine O'Donnell, Ken Buck

  • What is with all the dislikes?

    I can understand why liberals would dislike this, but why should republicans?

    Santorum has the cleanest past out of all the candidates and he has a decent record.

  • @UNCHARTEDuniverse Not only is Santorum a bible-thumping moralist who wants to impose his narrow world-view on each of us, and run our lives, he's got a very liberal voting record. He voted against Medicaid reform, against Food Stamp reform, against TANF reform, voted for Federal funding for anti-gun education in schools, voted against the National Right to Work Act, voted six times to raise the federal minimum wage, & voted to increase spending for the Department of Education by $3.1 billion.

  • @jhbombb

    Maybe you don't like the guy, but saying that he wants to "impose his narrow world-view on each of us, and run our lives" is absurd.

    This election is about the economy and government spending not social issues.

  • @UNCHARTEDuniverse It's not absurd. The erosion of civil liberties in this country has been going on for far too long. He just attacked individualism a couple days ago on CNN. Could you imagine this man in office with the recently passed NDAA having the ability to indefinitely detain US citizens without a trial? Nightmare.

    And if the election is about the economy and government spending, I'll simply point you to Ron Paul.

  • @UNCHARTEDuniverse congratulations you just hit the nail on the head and answered your own question. This election is NOT about social issues, which is exactly why this has so many dislikes. Santorum is just another catholic douchebag who wants to shove his social ideas down the entire nations throats'. The only candidate who isn't doing that is Ron Paul, who actually runs his campaign based on his foreign policy/ economic positions, not social issues on who deserves rights and who doesn't.

  • @jhbombb

    I think a President who is consistent and true to his principled religious beliefs is a good thing for this Country, because he is a man of conviction and will try to do the right thing. Whether we agree with his beliefs or not. A President isnt going to force you to become a "Born again" Christian, Mormon or whatever. The constitution is clear on that. Don't be a "BiblePHOBE" and attack someone for their religious beliefs.

  • @3544S You can be a man of principle without forcing your beliefs upon others, which is exactly what Santorum tries to do, and he doesn't even deny it. Santorum supports the drug war (and strengthening it), supports a Constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage (hell, he thinks we should ban gay sexual activity), supports a federal ban of abortion, and the list could go on. Santorum is a moralist and he wants to use his Christian beliefs and impose them upon the entire country.

  • @jhbombb

    I agree with Santorum on Gay Marriage. I think "Marriage" needs to be defined as being Male/Female. However, like Santorum, I agree that States should ultimately implement their own laws related to domestic partnerships. Essentially affording Gays the same privledges of married couples, without actually calling it "Marriage" per se. I believe Marriage needs to be defined at the Federal level, so we are all on the same page as to its definition. We dont need 50 different definitions

  • @3544S Marriage has been redefined a billion other times before. The bible also forbade interfaith marriages as well. It's ridiculous that two loving people who happen to be gay can't get married, but Larry King can be married on eight separate occasions and Kim Kardashian can get married and divorced within 72 days.Regardless, our Federal government has no business in defining marriage -- leave it up to the churches to decide.

    Also, if Santorum had his way, being gay would be ILLEGAL.

  • @jhbombb

    I respect your opinion, you seem like a smart person. However, In all the examples that you referenced, you spoke of male/female relationships. Its core premise of being comprised of males and females has remained true for over 3,000 years. So I disagree that its core definition has "been re-defined a billion other times". Santorum DOES NOT want to make being Gay unlawful, no more than I do. Just because its not our "cup of tea", does not mean we want to toss the tea pot out. :-)

  • @UNCHARTEDuniverse look up his claims and quotes and you will see how retarded this guy is

  • @UNCHARTEDuniverse

    I agree! GO SANTORUM!

  • @3544S

    I am just defending Santorum.

    I actually am a Newt supporter.

  • Anyone who voted for Obama in '08 is retarded and anyone who votes for Obama this year is retarded.How stupid can you be?

  • Iran could lob a nuke at the US from offshore no problem They don't need an ICBM all they need is a ship and the missils they are already using

  • So we should wait to be attacked and lose American lives, before we intervene in foriegn affairs?

  • Ron Paul is dangerous and a loon. If he were president in 1941 we would all be speaking Japanese and German today, because he would not have had the cahonies to intervene in foreign affairs.

  • @3544S Wrong. We were attacked during World War II by Japan and he would've blown them out of the water.

  • @jhbombb

    Sorry Buddy, but I'd prefer to have a President who does not wait to be attacked and risk American lives. I'd rather prevent an attack by intervening prior to an attack. Pearl Harbor could have been prevented if we would have taken a more proactive approach and stopped Hitler early on. I dont want to wait until Iran nukes Israel and the US. I'd rather see us take a proactive approach.

  • @3544S You're warmongering. Iran does not have a nuclear weapon, they are not on the verge of acquiring one, and EVEN IF THEY DID, they could NEVER reach the United States with one. We were "proactive" with Iraq, how did that work out?

  • @jhbombb

    All sources point to Iran developing Nukes. They already have nuclear energy and further enriching of uranium for Nuclear weapons capabilities is not too far of a leap, in terms of technological know-how, at this point in the game. Their missle weapons capabilities give them an effective range greater than 1,200 miles, which puts Israel and all our US bases within striking distance. Additionally, it isnt too hard send a small scale nuke to mexico and cross the border into the US.

  • @3544S Most of that "evidence" is totally fraudulent. (source = mepc[DOT]org/journal/middle-ea­st-policy-archives/iran-nuclea­r-alleged-studies-documents)

    Hey, if we didn't have US military bases in 135 countries around the world, maybe it wouldn't be an issue? Israel would be within their striking range, sure, but Iran is not suicidal. Israel could absolutely crush them the second Ahmadinejad layed his finger on the red button.

  • @3544S Ever Think a Pre Emptive attack on Iran Might Start WW3 Both China and Russia have stated they will back IRAN and if all this propoganda about Iran(Which smells alot like Iraq) were true do you actually think they will Committ Suicide. I DOUBT IT WAKE UP!!!

  • @GMF14692

    Yes, Iran would commit suicide, their President believes that his martyrdom will bring his messiah into the world. HE WANTS WW3. Educate yourselves on Iran theology and dont compare them to China and Russia. Mutual Assured Destruction works with China and Russia, because they don't want to be martyrs anymore than we do. Iran's unique and terrorfying theology, coupled with their nuclear ambitions, should cause you to stand up and be alarmed. The cold war will not work with them.

  • Santorum has my vote! Go Rick! Go!

  • @3544S Wow voters like you make me sick.. look up the facts and his quotes he made this guy is so retarded i cant describe how fucked in the head this candidate is Ron Paul 2012

  • Hey Ricky boy, where does the Pope stand on war with Iran?