I have NX100, and yes NEX-5 has better lens and pictures (especially at high ISO), but it's pretty complicated and not like DSLR at all (for settings - ISO/A f-stops/exposure is hard to set). So using NX100 you will set that faster, and it's cheaper. So the choice is yours - if you want a DSLR like camera - use NX100, if you want better quality (especially at high ISO) go for NEX5/3. ;)
I have NX100, and yes NEX-5 has better lens and pictures (especially at high ISO), but it's pretty complicated and not like DSLR at all (for settings - ISO/A f-stops/exposure is hard to set). So using NX100 you will set that faster, and it's cheaper. So the choice is yours - if you want a DSLR like camera - use NX100, if you want better quality (especially at high ISO) go for NEX5/3. ;)
nitrowad 5 months ago
BTW NEX 5's design is fucking SHIT!!! hahahahaha.....at least didn't pay or hire someone to defend their products :P
yowbestfriend 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
don't forget these
Chromatic Abberration - Depends on LENS, not BODY
LCD - 922K dots tilt LCD vs 614k dots PENTILE (half the res) AMOLED
Flash - External Flash is INCLUDED
Movie - 1080i 60 fps AVCHD w/ stereo sound vs 720P 30 fps MP4 w/ mono sound
Weight - 229g vs 353g
ISO - 12800 vs 3200
Continuous shooting - 7 FPS vs 3FPS
yowbestfriend 11 months ago
biased :p
sonyNEX 5 is way better!!!! hahahahahaha
yowbestfriend 11 months ago