Glamour Shoot using an Octobox

[benbernschneider]

the pictures of this guy are horrible!!!!?

[jefferybrownphoto]

sorry i just dont like this video.... its very amateur & dated. the upload says 2009 but it looks more like 1989. seems to know his stuff, just sayin.

[sgtbenda1]

Worked very well thank you for the tips.

[shimarlie1]

wow totally fooled me. I thought I was at the Acropolis?

you mean this is NOT ancient Greece?

[sampreap]

does this guy even know how to light? looks like a mug shot

[AbzeRd]

retarted policeman: "BOOBIES!!"

[shahidkhan090]

Juicy and Milky yummy Boobs. I love it. 

[natt73]

Pervert!!!!



[natt73]

Pervert!!!!

[JohnnyOB7]

If you'd tap that, you need some better models.

[inplayground]

she is so hot!

[redman68au]

@noreplyism 'tramp stamp'! bahahaha! love it!

[kascomyo]

this soft light is so boring,,

[famousPhotog]

@kascomyo Very, very often soft light, especially over the entire set, is boring. However, using hard directional light requires a much higher level of skill, less margin for error, and more post processing. These are some of the reasons why so many mid-level photogs promote the the use of soft-light.

[RokhuStar]

Id tapped that !

[jajaboss]

Glamour Shoot using an autobot

[noreplyism]

Shame about the tramp stamp!  Kind of ruins a glamour shoot...

[kernow62]

@noreplyism Agree, would need to clone that out.

[benquelodi]

nice i love the music too..thanx

[martenfisher1]

He uses a soft box and then blows out the picture with flash.

[TheStudioCoach]

@martenfisher1 The softbox is powered by a flash..... there is no on camera flash.... look carefuly ...

[maxellison55]

@martenfisher1

The device on his camera is a remote trigger! NOT a flash. Sheesh............

[a03575sec]

Your videos are great - but the music is annoying ... I suggexst mix it softer or remove it all together. Thanx for the information :))

[0achilles]

Teach How to get subject there, I will deal with the light myself :D

[youmantube2009]

I love all you tutorials! This one is so great...kepp making tutorials please, I am learning a lot! Thank you so much!

[feedthebear51]

Nice photos!

[ramanaprasad369]

nice video..and tutorial.

thank you for sharing..

[utubeady]

Superbly made tutorial and very educational. Thanks and well done.

[ProPhotoHouston02]

Always a fan, Great video

[LETONEIN]

Nice video, but please BIN the music - you don't need it.

[abokwu]

@LETONEIN sounds like pron music

[qazzoid]

"watts per second"?? The watt is a unit of power so watts per second does not make sense - unless he is talking about the rate of change of power - which he is not. I suppose he means watt-seconds. But, since 1 watt is 1 joule per second, talking about watt-seconds is rather like talking about kilometers per hour hours rather than just saying kilometers. So, he should just be saying, for example, 60 joules instead of 60 watts per second.

[thinkfaster]

@qazzoid You're exactly right, it's just that "watt second" is what marketing departments use to describe strobes, probably because they thought consumers were used to the idea of lightbulbs being rated by watts. Of course, in both cases the measurement is useless for comparing actual light output of different sources.

[ASFotoWUE]

@qazzoid Watts per second (Ws) is the same as Joule

[qazzoid]

@ASFotoWUE watts per second, which would be written W/s or Ws^-1, is NOT the same as joules. Watt-seconds, which would be written Ws, is the same as joules.

[johnny48166]

@qazzoid One measure of a strobes performance is indeed watt seconds (Ws).

I have two Bowens Gemini strobes and they are 500Ws each.

[qazzoid]

@johnny48166 Quite so. However, the watt is a derived unit of power in the International System of Units (SI). It is defined as one joule per second. So it just seems much simpler to say that your strobes are 500 joules each (500J each).

As I already said "talking about watt-seconds is rather like talking about kilometers-per-hour-hours rather than just saying kilometers"

[locoboy007]

Beautiful Model, Nice acceptable setup - Thanks for sharing this. the octobox is awesome.

[poppamonk]

Nice vid

[ChicoEdge]

I like the Octobox too. I also use something called a Softliter II, which is a similar concept. It's a big umbrella with a translucent white cover. The light from your flash bounces off of the umbrella and passes back through the cover, so your light has been diffused twice.

[NiTrOfuZiOn]

@ChicoEdge ive heard of that they say its good im thinking about using the softliter2

[ChicoEdge]

@NiTrOfuZiOn

They are wonderful. I have two 60" Softliter IIs and they are used at pretty much every shoot. These things are so versatile. You can use them as a reflecting brolly, a shoot through or the double layer softliter. One catch... if you use one outside make sure you have weights or a flash that weighs a few pounds. I used one with a speedlight and the brolly's large size caught the breeze several times and tried to fly away!

[NiTrOfuZiOn]

@ChicoEdge take cover flying softliters above

BOOM!!!! no his head