man this movie suck! it suck so hard! it´s the worse fucking movie i have seen in years! so the guy is an assasin a thief why should i care about John Dilinger huh? it sucks!
I really, really hated the cinematography in this movie. Supposedly Mann used it to make it make the 30's feel as real as possible, and he doesn't seem to understand the difference between 'real' and 'if it was shot by a real person on a regular camera'. It took me out of it so much, and if he really wanted to make it feel real then he shouldn't have made it feel like a glorified crime epic or have taken so many creative liberties. It's inconsistent.
oooooooohhhhhhhhhh All digital, i thought it would be all analog. gaaaaay. i enjoyed it, but yeah, in some parts, id say the quality was equal to that of the blair witch project.
great review 5stars as always but what i dont get is why did they shoot this movie it all in digital as you say the quality drops at some points which isnt acceptable for any film so werent the makers aware that the quality drops ?
man this movie suck! it suck so hard! it´s the worse fucking movie i have seen in years! so the guy is an assasin a thief why should i care about John Dilinger huh? it sucks!
NishiSouchiro 2 years ago
Spot on review! I felt exactly the same. Keep 'em coming
steveodavis86 2 years ago
I really, really hated the cinematography in this movie. Supposedly Mann used it to make it make the 30's feel as real as possible, and he doesn't seem to understand the difference between 'real' and 'if it was shot by a real person on a regular camera'. It took me out of it so much, and if he really wanted to make it feel real then he shouldn't have made it feel like a glorified crime epic or have taken so many creative liberties. It's inconsistent.
HELLOPEOPLEPEOPLEHI 2 years ago
oooooooohhhhhhhhhh All digital, i thought it would be all analog. gaaaaay. i enjoyed it, but yeah, in some parts, id say the quality was equal to that of the blair witch project.
youhalfpipe 2 years ago
actually from what i have read
this movie is not true to the REAL John Dilinger
(obviously)
the one true part was the end when that chick sold him out for a green card
inugumu 2 years ago
jimmmaayyy need more reviews! come on and get on it! YOUR DA BOMMMMBB. show your face please!
tayloroswalt 2 years ago 6
You're really good at reviewing. Very fair
LucysGottaGrin 2 years ago
Digital 0_o?
alhex123 2 years ago
I love your Reviews. You say the whole truth w/o any Critic lingo
Mcrlover2death 2 years ago
great review 5stars as always but what i dont get is why did they shoot this movie it all in digital as you say the quality drops at some points which isnt acceptable for any film so werent the makers aware that the quality drops ?
skyestheword 2 years ago
mint review keep it up m8
SpikeL4 2 years ago
wow. best review u got so far. I still want to watch this. Why didn't they shoot in digital--losers.
eckosama 2 years ago
Actually they shot in ALL digital. Most movies are a hybrid of both.
jimmybenkins 2 years ago
o i c. That's stupid. So, is Johnny Depp not as G as ppl expected him to be? And how much action did they have in the movie?
eckosama 2 years ago
ur reviews are the shittt
bigfut1017 2 years ago
very good review.
ScopeStudios 2 years ago
first but good review
Tacoman1013 2 years ago