I'm voting for Nick Coons. I don't agree with his position on certain aspects of foreign policy, but his priorities and more importantly, his ability to speak toward individual personal freedom is unmatched
A good debate, thanks for posting it. The R&D candidates are clearly unwilling to branch out into new ideas and so they were only saying things which were "safe" and "popular", such as the crazy Arizona immigration stuff.
I feel that you didn't get as much opportunity to speak as you should have, it felt like 20% 40% 40%, and people may have gotten the impression that you're more conservative than Schweikert on business only (social issues weren't discussed at any length, drugs/prostitution etc
I'm voting for Nick Coons. I don't agree with his position on certain aspects of foreign policy, but his priorities and more importantly, his ability to speak toward individual personal freedom is unmatched
ICONICFREEDOM 1 year ago
A good debate, thanks for posting it. The R&D candidates are clearly unwilling to branch out into new ideas and so they were only saying things which were "safe" and "popular", such as the crazy Arizona immigration stuff.
I feel that you didn't get as much opportunity to speak as you should have, it felt like 20% 40% 40%, and people may have gotten the impression that you're more conservative than Schweikert on business only (social issues weren't discussed at any length, drugs/prostitution etc
JAStewart 1 year ago
@JAStewart - excellent observation! I absolutely agree
ICONICFREEDOM 1 year ago