In order to quell Tibetan dissent, the CCP restricts religious activity in Tibet and created "patriotic education campaigns" that promote a state-sanctioned version of Buddhism. The state monitors daily operations of major monasteries and it reserves the right to disapprove any individual's application to take up religious orders. "Beijing's hope is that ultimately a new generation of Tibetans will emerge that will be less influenced by religion.
"My true ideal, actually, in this Chinese security department is really to do something for the Chinese people and the nation. But I really hated doing things just for the interest of the Communist Party and a lot of times those things that are in the interest of the Communist Party are doing harm to the Chinese people."
In the mid-nineteenth century Britain made repeated overtures to Tibet to open a land route for trade purposes, essentially a covert design to expand the plunder of China. The Tibetans were fearful of Britain, so they always rebuffed British offers. In the first two years of the twentieth century the British made up their mind to force open Tibet, instead of waiting for Tibetan consent.
The meticulous planning to attack Tibet started when George Nathaniel Curzon was the Viceroy of British-India. A 28 year old Curzon who had embarked upon a tour of Asia in 1887, much to the dislike of his austere father who believed that landowners should stay on their land and not roam the world, continued travelling till 1895, and had been mesmerised by the wealth of the East.
Four years after his travels in Asia, Curzon at the age of forty was picked from a junior governmental office in Britain to the British Raj on the 6th of January 1899. This ambitious man often described as an out-and-out imperialist, who would continue to hold the high office of Viceroy till the 18th of November 1905, desired to earn a name for himself, and chose to fulfil his ambition through the expansion of the British Raj by colonisation of the adjoining countries.
Tibet lying to the immediate north, strategically located between China, India and Russia, drew his attention. He strongly advocated the colonisation of Tibet on the pretext to create a buffer between powerful Russia and his British Indian Empire, but the real intention perhaps was to expand the lucrative opium trade in China, which had been subjugated by the British in the Opium Wars half a century earlier.
Tibetans do not want communism. Hundreds of thousands of Tibetans have died as a result of communism in Tibet. And well over 100,000 Tibetans have fled Tibet to escape what is happening under communism in Tibet.
dream on ..... - the regime of ther religius leaders was far mor brutal as the communist doday - at least they brought an educational system for ALL chinese ...... (for the uiguris, for the mongols, the chinese koreans, the han chinese and for the tibetans too ....)
Tibetans do not have any control over education in Tibet. That is why thousands of young Tibetans risk their lives escaping Prison Camp Tibet every year. Tibetans would like their country back.
Tibet was NEVER part of china and NEVER under Han Chinese control before 1950.
China and Tibet were controlled by Mongols at Yuan Dynasty and by Manchus at Qing Dynasty.
Mongols, Manchus and Tibetans are not Chinese.
Every treaty and agreement that is signed with Tibet and every stamp on a Tibetan passport recognises Tibet. Google "Tibet treaties" and "Tibet passport" to learn more.
These nerds who talk about freeing Tibet... I am also talking about freeing Tibet... The nerds are talking about Westernised Tibetans freeing Tibet...
I am talking about the safety of Tibet from being colonised again by the Westerners...
Can Tibet be FREE for long... It will have an outpost manned by Britain or U.S. and they say TIBET IS FREE....
WTF... Tibet will NOT BE FREE... To the West, Tibet should be Free from China. To China, Tibet should be Free from Westerners.
Pre-1950 America treated Blacks like virtual slaves, but the world has changed so much that today a Black man is the President. It did not take the CCP to liberate America for that to happen. Tibet is now in the modern world too. China used to have slaves, eunuch ones (how barbaric is that to cut off a man's testicles!!!) but of course they don't do that now. The point is that Tibet, like the rest of the world is not living in the past.
You ain't seen nothing yet, babe... you ain't did not thinking yete, babe... you ain't know nuts about history... English did not kill Scottish.... hahahahahahaha... See "Brave Heart", the story of the Scottish Patriot..... When English kill, they don't announce to you, stupid.
These so called human right activists tourist are only arrogant and ignorant.They never ask why they are under survellance?If these people were not supporting the Tibetan's separatism,then who else interested to watch them?They always wish to divide up other nation,but not in 1 second think of their discrimination to the black and their cruelty during their colonial era in Africa!They are just sheer western hypocrisy!
Westerners are very aware of the genocidal past. That is exactly the motivation and education that gives them the "right" and moral obligation to make sure that these barbaric activities are called out and stopped. That is not hypocrisy, that is decency. Chinese people should thank them, not stick their head in the sand...by becoming a decent society, China will not become divided, but rather united in humanity. Nation State status comes after Universal Human Rights. Get a better argument....
Blacks and whites together need to realize how Chinese are ruining our country and the entire world.
Those motherfuckers need to get the fuck out of Tibet.
Chinese are cowards. They can't fight one on one and they hide behind tanks, guns, and computer screens.
I'd love one of you chinese motherfuckers to talk shit to my face.Bet you Chinese are as quiet as Church mouse when you around black people.Tibetans aint white you dumb shits. Stop using black experience to promote your Chinese agenda
so it was a great achivment, when china extendet the rail way system to ther provinc tibet. The tibetans should be greatfull to china, for opening an gate to the world .......
@1 ,Let us look at the evidence. If Tibetans were so fiercely suppressed,and if Chinese leaders in Beijing were really out to Sinocize Tibet byincreasing the ethnic ratio of Han to Tibetan, then why are all Tibetanfamilies permitted to have up to three children, and are only finedsmall amounts of money if they exceed this number?
this proves nothing. LOOK AT THE REAL EVIDENCE. OVER A MILLION DEAD, THOUSANDS OF TEMPLES DESTROYED. AUTONOMY SNATCHED AWAY. BUDDHISM STAMPED OUT. FUK CHINA & FUK U
@2,Tibetan families inTibet average 3.8 children, larger than Tibetan families in India. Infact, the population of Tibet in 1959 was only about 1.19 million.Today however, the population of Greater Tibet is 7.3 million, ofwhich, according to the 2000 census, 6 million are ethnic Tibetans.
The GOOD thing about all of this? That China Govt wasn't able to portray Tibet wrongly, as they had hoped. "Decked out" is an understatement of what has been done to Lhasa to make it "Olympic"
Lhasa will be fine, once it is turned back over to Tibetans...and the 300+whorehouses there bulldozed....like everything, except Potola and Jokhang Temple....the rest is an ulcer of cultural cancer,& MUST be removed.
There is zero evidence to indicate that the Chinese had opened fire on Tibetans and killing 140. First of all, there is no motive. Why would the Chinese army open fire on it's own citizens? Second of all, it's not a reliable source. The Union is anti-China entirely, they are located in India, and they do not have any authority whatso ever to support their claims.
It always surprise me very much when the reporters (Westerner who probably couldn't speak either ethnical Tibetan language or Chinese Language Fluently) Had "Talked" To the Locals.
First Of all, in China, people do not speak English. Yes the kids are learning, but their level of english is not sufficient for any daily conversation other than "Hi" and "Bye".
Second of all, even less Ethnic Tibetans knows how to speak english. Just put yourself in their shoes.
I dont understand what you mean.I think you wann tell Tibetan in Tibet can speak english?Sure they can speak english I think better pronunciation then chinese.This is metter of fact.dont blame me ya?
Chinese security forces opened fire on a crowd this week in eastern Tibet and killed 140 people, the Dalai Lama told a French daily on Thursday. Chinese army again fired on a crowd "Killed by bullets, even though they were protesting without weapons. Their bodies were never given back to their families.
@ NA Support
In the US and Canada people are free to protest, speak out and hire lawyers.
.
No so in the PRC
No so in the PRC
HumanRightsVideosT 7 months ago
Free Tibet,Boycott China
swordofpakistan 9 months ago
Why are we trading with a Nazi state like China? Just build a wall around this giant shithole, and let them live inside it.
gabrielg01 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In order to quell Tibetan dissent, the CCP restricts religious activity in Tibet and created "patriotic education campaigns" that promote a state-sanctioned version of Buddhism. The state monitors daily operations of major monasteries and it reserves the right to disapprove any individual's application to take up religious orders. "Beijing's hope is that ultimately a new generation of Tibetans will emerge that will be less influenced by religion.
dorje168 2 years ago
Yeap that is how you should treat the so-called West Europeans and i hope Africans would also start taking the same measures
eristars 2 years ago
A Former Chinese Communist Official:
"My true ideal, actually, in this Chinese security department is really to do something for the Chinese people and the nation. But I really hated doing things just for the interest of the Communist Party and a lot of times those things that are in the interest of the Communist Party are doing harm to the Chinese people."
JetZep 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
奴隶制(共产主义),奴隶主(共产党)拥有奴隶(人民)的制度。奴隶(人民)须为奴隶主(共产党)干活,无报酬,且无人身自由。法律确认奴隶为奴隶主的私有财产,共产主义跟奴隶制也一样,国家所有财产归共产党。人民跟本不可能享受自己生产所得的回报。奴隶主(共产党)对奴隶(人民)握有生杀予夺的权力,可随意奴役、杀害。奴隶(人民)没有独立的人格,没有任何自由和权利。
brokensocialism 2 years ago
dont go to Tibet, dont give the chinese your money.....
dont be a tourist ....terrible tragedy...
gojibebe 2 years ago
1 of 4:
In the mid-nineteenth century Britain made repeated overtures to Tibet to open a land route for trade purposes, essentially a covert design to expand the plunder of China. The Tibetans were fearful of Britain, so they always rebuffed British offers. In the first two years of the twentieth century the British made up their mind to force open Tibet, instead of waiting for Tibetan consent.
peacemetta 2 years ago
Delete historic spam from peacemetta
ChinaKillsNunsLoots 2 years ago
2 of 4:
The meticulous planning to attack Tibet started when George Nathaniel Curzon was the Viceroy of British-India. A 28 year old Curzon who had embarked upon a tour of Asia in 1887, much to the dislike of his austere father who believed that landowners should stay on their land and not roam the world, continued travelling till 1895, and had been mesmerised by the wealth of the East.
peacemetta 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Delete historic spam from peacemetta
ChinaKillsNunsLoots 2 years ago
Is this video about 1887 or 1895 ???
HumanRightsVideosT 2 years ago
3 of 4:
Four years after his travels in Asia, Curzon at the age of forty was picked from a junior governmental office in Britain to the British Raj on the 6th of January 1899. This ambitious man often described as an out-and-out imperialist, who would continue to hold the high office of Viceroy till the 18th of November 1905, desired to earn a name for himself, and chose to fulfil his ambition through the expansion of the British Raj by colonisation of the adjoining countries.
peacemetta 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Delete historic spam from peacemetta
ChinaKillsNunsLoots 2 years ago
Is this video about 1899 ???
HumanRightsVideosT 2 years ago
4 of 4:
Tibet lying to the immediate north, strategically located between China, India and Russia, drew his attention. He strongly advocated the colonisation of Tibet on the pretext to create a buffer between powerful Russia and his British Indian Empire, but the real intention perhaps was to expand the lucrative opium trade in China, which had been subjugated by the British in the Opium Wars half a century earlier.
peacemetta 2 years ago
Is this video about the British Empire ????
HumanRightsVideosT 2 years ago
IT IS NOT A MATTER of whether Tibetans are Chinese.
......of whether Tibet is FREE or IMPRISONED.
.....of whether anybody was killed, tortured, maimed, etc. (as in war nobody treat each other with kid-gloves like in Gaza, Kashmir, Sri Lanka, etc).
........of whether China PRC transgresses Human Rights or not.
========================
IT IS A MATTER OF TIBET being a military strategic location VALUED for its high ground and size (1/2 the size of Europe).
=========================
peacemetta 2 years ago
Its a matter of the communists LOOTING Tibet for 60 years. Learn more about Tibet.
HumanRightsVideosT 2 years ago
tibet is free - it has been freed from the monatarian diktationship 50 years ago .....
CapitanoGUC 2 years ago
Tibet is not free. It was invaded by the communists 60 years ago.
ChinaKillsNunsLoots 2 years ago
yes the comunist took over in the entire china - so tibet too
- the comunist were quite radikal and absolutistic - but for tibet it brougt more advatages then disadvantages ....
CapitanoGUC 2 years ago
Tibetans do not want communism. Hundreds of thousands of Tibetans have died as a result of communism in Tibet. And well over 100,000 Tibetans have fled Tibet to escape what is happening under communism in Tibet.
ChinaKillsNunsLoots 2 years ago
and far more have died as an result the pravtises of there religius leaders ............:-)
CapitanoGUC 2 years ago
Tibetans did not die as a result of anything their leaders did.
The overwhelming majority of Tibetans in Tibet were happy before 1950. But in 2009 the overwhelming majority of Tibetans in Tibet are NOT happy.
ChinaKillsNunsLoots 2 years ago
dream on ..... - the regime of ther religius leaders was far mor brutal as the communist doday - at least they brought an educational system for ALL chinese ...... (for the uiguris, for the mongols, the chinese koreans, the han chinese and for the tibetans too ....)
CapitanoGUC 2 years ago
Tibetans do not have any control over education in Tibet. That is why thousands of young Tibetans risk their lives escaping Prison Camp Tibet every year. Tibetans would like their country back.
ChinaKillsNunsLoots 2 years ago
well - without the reoccupaton by the chinese motherland, they wouldn´t have any educational system .... (only for the monks and priests ....)
CapitanoGUC 2 years ago
Tibet was NEVER part of china and NEVER under Han Chinese control before 1950.
China and Tibet were controlled by Mongols at Yuan Dynasty and by Manchus at Qing Dynasty.
Mongols, Manchus and Tibetans are not Chinese.
Every treaty and agreement that is signed with Tibet and every stamp on a Tibetan passport recognises Tibet. Google "Tibet treaties" and "Tibet passport" to learn more.
ChinaKillsNunsLoots 2 years ago
google ??? - befor you diden´t accept anything, which is whriten at Wikipedia. .....
CapitanoGUC 2 years ago
Have you seen a Tibetan passport ????
Go to
friendsoftibet. org/mediaonfot/20040402a.html
(take out the spaces)
ChinaKillsNunsLoots 2 years ago
These nerds who talk about freeing Tibet... I am also talking about freeing Tibet... The nerds are talking about Westernised Tibetans freeing Tibet...
I am talking about the safety of Tibet from being colonised again by the Westerners...
Can Tibet be FREE for long... It will have an outpost manned by Britain or U.S. and they say TIBET IS FREE....
WTF... Tibet will NOT BE FREE... To the West, Tibet should be Free from China. To China, Tibet should be Free from Westerners.
peacemetta 2 years ago
You talk about history pal and spam this video.
HumanRightsVideosT 2 years ago
Well said!!!
eristars 2 years ago
Pre-1950 America treated Blacks like virtual slaves, but the world has changed so much that today a Black man is the President. It did not take the CCP to liberate America for that to happen. Tibet is now in the modern world too. China used to have slaves, eunuch ones (how barbaric is that to cut off a man's testicles!!!) but of course they don't do that now. The point is that Tibet, like the rest of the world is not living in the past.
unit45x 2 years ago 2
tibet should be free with kiss or kick......
coltsamuel96 2 years ago
darkjing is a cunt
KingOfTrees85 3 years ago
"king of trees" is the king of cunts and nothing more
jimbomitchell 2 years ago
dont insult Tibetans by saying chinese
we tibetans are not chinese.
every tibetans in tibet have this in their mind.
darjking 3 years ago
Dont insult Scotish by saying English
we Scotish are not English.
every Scotish in UK have this in their mind.
:-)
chayedan01 3 years ago
nonsense commnist chink,
just let independent media in Tibet. truth will come.
darjking 3 years ago
at least the English don't kill the Scottish for practicing their traditions
jimbomitchell 2 years ago
You ain't seen nothing yet, babe... you ain't did not thinking yete, babe... you ain't know nuts about history... English did not kill Scottish.... hahahahahahaha... See "Brave Heart", the story of the Scottish Patriot..... When English kill, they don't announce to you, stupid.
peacemetta 2 years ago
Delete brave heart spam from peacemetta
HumanRightsVideosT 2 years ago
These so called human right activists tourist are only arrogant and ignorant.They never ask why they are under survellance?If these people were not supporting the Tibetan's separatism,then who else interested to watch them?They always wish to divide up other nation,but not in 1 second think of their discrimination to the black and their cruelty during their colonial era in Africa!They are just sheer western hypocrisy!
bobowai 3 years ago
Westerners are very aware of the genocidal past. That is exactly the motivation and education that gives them the "right" and moral obligation to make sure that these barbaric activities are called out and stopped. That is not hypocrisy, that is decency. Chinese people should thank them, not stick their head in the sand...by becoming a decent society, China will not become divided, but rather united in humanity. Nation State status comes after Universal Human Rights. Get a better argument....
unit45x 2 years ago 2
I found that western ppl under 20 years old always screamed 'human rights'. Cause they are brain-washed by the media and have no ideas of their own.
Western ppl above 30 years old know more facts.
rainsniper 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Blacks and whites together need to realize how Chinese are ruining our country and the entire world.
Those motherfuckers need to get the fuck out of Tibet.
Chinese are cowards. They can't fight one on one and they hide behind tanks, guns, and computer screens.
I'd love one of you chinese motherfuckers to talk shit to my face.Bet you Chinese are as quiet as Church mouse when you around black people.Tibetans aint white you dumb shits. Stop using black experience to promote your Chinese agenda
cerratobill 3 years ago
so it was a great achivment, when china extendet the rail way system to ther provinc tibet. The tibetans should be greatfull to china, for opening an gate to the world .......
CapitanoGUC 3 years ago
tell your govt to extend FREEDOM.
tibetans want freedom not railway.
railway is for chinese immegraint in tibet.
FREEDOM FOR TIBET
darjking 3 years ago
what has my goverment to do with the tibet ???
And sure - the chinese goverment should provide more "freedom" to all his citizen from all the 56 ethnicitys of china, Tibetans includet.
CapitanoGUC 3 years ago
stick the railway up ur @rse Capitano
jimbomitchell 2 years ago
some pepole said you cant enter videos showing tibet parts but i could enter
hamo789 3 years ago
Go China!
845tube 3 years ago
@1 ,Let us look at the evidence. If Tibetans were so fiercely suppressed,and if Chinese leaders in Beijing were really out to Sinocize Tibet byincreasing the ethnic ratio of Han to Tibetan, then why are all Tibetanfamilies permitted to have up to three children, and are only finedsmall amounts of money if they exceed this number?
chinaupup 3 years ago
this proves nothing. LOOK AT THE REAL EVIDENCE. OVER A MILLION DEAD, THOUSANDS OF TEMPLES DESTROYED. AUTONOMY SNATCHED AWAY. BUDDHISM STAMPED OUT. FUK CHINA & FUK U
jimbomitchell 2 years ago 2
@2,Tibetan families inTibet average 3.8 children, larger than Tibetan families in India. Infact, the population of Tibet in 1959 was only about 1.19 million.Today however, the population of Greater Tibet is 7.3 million, ofwhich, according to the 2000 census, 6 million are ethnic Tibetans.
chinaupup 3 years ago
HUMAN RIGHTS IN TIBET!!!!!!!!!!
XpennyX07 3 years ago 2
Yes, human rights in Iraq! You Brit and US soliders should stop killing & raping the Iraquis, and stop stealing oil!!!!!!!
iwantdealhigh 3 years ago 2
sounds like SSDD, only with more guards...
The GOOD thing about all of this? That China Govt wasn't able to portray Tibet wrongly, as they had hoped. "Decked out" is an understatement of what has been done to Lhasa to make it "Olympic"
Lhasa will be fine, once it is turned back over to Tibetans...and the 300+whorehouses there bulldozed....like everything, except Potola and Jokhang Temple....the rest is an ulcer of cultural cancer,& MUST be removed.
patrickmahoney 3 years ago
There is zero evidence to indicate that the Chinese had opened fire on Tibetans and killing 140. First of all, there is no motive. Why would the Chinese army open fire on it's own citizens? Second of all, it's not a reliable source. The Union is anti-China entirely, they are located in India, and they do not have any authority whatso ever to support their claims.
ReversePsyc 3 years ago
It always surprise me very much when the reporters (Westerner who probably couldn't speak either ethnical Tibetan language or Chinese Language Fluently) Had "Talked" To the Locals.
First Of all, in China, people do not speak English. Yes the kids are learning, but their level of english is not sufficient for any daily conversation other than "Hi" and "Bye".
Second of all, even less Ethnic Tibetans knows how to speak english. Just put yourself in their shoes.
ReversePsyc 3 years ago
suspicions here: Can tibetan in China speech English?
susispeech 3 years ago
I dont understand what you mean.I think you wann tell Tibetan in Tibet can speak english?Sure they can speak english I think better pronunciation then chinese.This is metter of fact.dont blame me ya?
tibetanphoser 3 years ago
Chinese security forces opened fire on a crowd this week in eastern Tibet and killed 140 people, the Dalai Lama told a French daily on Thursday. Chinese army again fired on a crowd "Killed by bullets, even though they were protesting without weapons. Their bodies were never given back to their families.
Joe021970 3 years ago
Tibet is not china
china is not Tibet
one world, one dream free Tibet
after Olympics,the true china come out
china go home
the world will be peacefull .
avntz1 3 years ago
you shut up ,the world will be peacefull,you make much more noise!
54freeman 3 years ago