Added: 4 years ago
From: foxvscnn
Views: 4,511
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (43)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Wasn't this Unsolved History?

  • whats up with those reports saying other bombs were found in the building and defused?

  • @usintelreport They made mistakes. Not many people knew what was going on at the exact moment of the explosion.

  • They were not there....I was. This is disinfo

  • Who are they "owned" by. Believe me, they are owned. "That's an axel right there" Not two blocks away. FUCK YOU

  • We must test again...until we can recreate what didn't happen

  • Was not a Scoop and dump. The debris from the Murrah was taken to the local police training center and the 179th National Guard infantry sifted through it. They found everything you can think of in the way of guns, drugs, and crap. The local EOD came to the building twice. 1. picked up an inert tow missle. 2. Picked up box of blasting caps. Most of this was stuff recovered from citizens and some tools of law enforcent.

  • BEWARE OF THE COMPUTER SIMMULATION

    They are easily rigged or set to favor one side or another from the beginning.

  • i think we need to do the same thing with 9/11 recreate the buildings. and fly the planes in ofcourse is gonna be more expensive but dont you wanna find outt the truth

  • that exactly what i was thinking dedicatedcitizen the truck bomb might act like n ignition to much more explosives that were in the building like c4 but few knew about those explosives and gov agents took those away to cover up

  • Narrated by Q. Awesomeness.

  • Not box cutters, not Ryder vans, not aluminum planes.

    Barometric bomb....

    Go and test this on a building rated better than seismic zone 1.....

  • The GOV did NOT plot to blow up the Murrah. At first is wasreported a gas main and half the building was destroyed. Call the KFOR reporter Kevin Ogle! he said the other three bombs were larger than the 4,000 lb bomb that exploded? B.S. There was only one crater! IMHO, it is possible the truck bomb caused explosives stored in the building to explode.

  • @DedicatedCitizen

    There supposedly wasn't a crator.or just a very small one. It doesn't matter if they reported it as a gas leak. There were witnesses to the bomb squad being there circa 6:00 AM. Rep. Charles Key claims he was told that ATF actually didn know about in advance and that they were allowing them to go ahead with it but planned on stopping them at the last moment, so they get all the glory and more funding but supposedly it went wrong and they were too late. (continued)

  • @TheStarfkr I watched “Cover-up in Oklahoma” and have read books and the report itself as well as having responded to it. The crater I saw was 30ft wide. Al-Qaeda cell? I think you mean Iraqi cell. I read “The Third Terrorist” and have done my own investigating, but nada as of yet. IMHO, OKC was not a false flag, but anything is possible. Now the USS Liberty, IMHO, that was a false flag pulled off by our government.

  • @DedicatedCitizen

    Search YouTube for "Was Timothy McVeigh working for Bin Ladin and al-Qaeda?". I don't know if OKC was a false flag, but what I do know is that the whole truth hasn't been made public and there's more to the story than people have been led to believe. Too many unsanswered questions. The investigation needs to be reopened.

  • @TheStarfkr I watched as asked and it is stuff from the book "The Third Terrorist." I posted on that page. I only know what I saw and experienced over two weeks on site, but I see people keep spouting facts such as there was no crater and I KNOW there was. Did McVeigh or Osama Bin Ladin plan this crime? Which one could be proven in a court of law?" Most Murder cases have unanswered questions. I don't think the investigation did completely close. Others unknown.

  • @DedicatedCitizen

    The investigation is officially closed. That's why a lot of people want a new investigation.

  • @DedicatedCitizen

    (continued)

    The problem is that once you know the official story is wrong then how do we seperate the story that they were just too late vs. another interpretation of that they purposefully let it happen. See where I'm going with this. Plus they completely quashed the fact that there was an al-Qaeda cell in OKC just miles away and that there were multiple suspects seen and not just Timothy McVeigh.

  • Why do they not explain the live news coverage of the very large bombs that didn't explode being removed from inside the building? How did they get there? Until they address that, what else matters.

  • @swokdirtfarm Can you post the link if there is one? Thanks.

  • If "they" could be trusted in the first place, explosive "tagance" would identify what was used. OK bombing is the first example of the scoop and dump of evidence, that was done with the trade towers.

    Ok bombing was an inside job.

  • nobody cares about how he did it everyone cares about why the federal government didnt do anything about it

  • dont you love bullshit computer models...use common sence instead

  • I've seen this before.

  • Please consider watching "Cover-up in Oklahoma" on YouTube. It provides some of the most solid evidence that it state-sponsored false flag terrorism.

  • Can you seriously not see whats going on? Are you REALLY that BLIND?? WOW!

  • google terrance yeakey. he was the first police officer on the scene.

    his eye witness report states that he saw window glass blown outward from a blast inside the building that was prior to the main truck bomb. his report has been sealed by the OKC Police Dept.

    He died surrounded in mysterious circumstances. it was ruled a suicide, but no autopsy was done.

    research & make up your own mind. don't let others think for you.

  • the government did it. petition congress to make them release the video tapes.

  • while i dont believe that the discovery channel is on the govts payroll for making conspiracy-debunking propaganda, i doubt that their recreation is accurate or complete. come on people, its the fucking discovery channel, their word is not final.

  • They got the layout of the barrells wrong. Timothy McVeigh drew numerous diagrams showing how he placed them.

  • Lopez, you're onto something. McVeigh, as well as everyone in the military who handles explosives is WELL AWARE of the Munroe shaped charge effect. One thing's for sure, always question those who question.

  • You say this debunks the conspiracy???

    Are you fucking stupid? A government funded experiment with fake results more like.

  • You conspiracy theorists need to have your head examined. Your constant search for malice just proves your apparent depression and self-hatred. Do you check under your bed at night for the man on the grassy knoll?

  • Im just saying it would need to be conducted by an independant firm with no lnks to the CIA or government other wise they can just say what ever they want and we will beleive it.

  • The collumn which would have been connected at the top did not fail and only blew over slightly. the test did not secure the top of the collumn in space at all, let alone to the degree in which it would in real life.

  • discovery channel is owned by terrorist just like history channels ''debunking 911'' show

  • debunking is bullshit, why don't you try putting the WHOLE stories together and presenting it, not just try to cover up all the problems with the official version of events

  • I don't buy this at all. Many explosives experts, not just Partin, have stated that it was impossible.

    Let's note that the guy whose on the scene analyzing the test works in counter-terrorism for New Mexico Tech, which has connections to Directed Energy Weapons, the US government, and the training of 9/11 Pentagon responders. He also seems like he's acting, so I would say he's a shill.

    They also ignore the fact that local news stations reported explosives being carried out of the building!

  • Do you have any actual disagreement with anything in the video, or is this a case of Truthiness on your part?

  • No, it's a case of 'common sense'. When you suspect someone of assisting in a government cover-up, you aren't going to trust any tests they give you.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more