The U.S. population is 330 million. It's less than 5% of world's population. Yet consumes 25% of the world's energy resources, 30% of the world's natural resources, 15% of the world's clean water, has the highest per ca-pita drug abuse, obesity, diabetes, incarceration, gun deaths, one of the highest infant mortality and capital punishment rates (2nd only to China). It's on it's death bed watching American Idol and Xbox.
governments only real purpose is to protect our liberties what we need is a world without government. a world of "people" a world without the ever presence of a corporate technological puppeteer. this is the moment where either we sit down and watch the tube or walk away.
I see humanity operating in a hierarchical pyramidal system when I think we operate better as a cellular based system where no one person dictates to the other. We collectively work it through. Govt's have to be a service for the people, not manipulating them. They should be run by the very best specialists in the country, not popular elected no bodies... Volunteers who are the best in their field of expertise, not snakes who manage to weasel their way to the top through manipulation. Ethics!!
@masternumber22 Geneticist have already proven that "White" genes are all recessive genes; which nature is rapidly eliminating from the DNA pool. Eventually there won't be anymore greedy, ignorant, racist bigots left to worry about."
Right-wing idiots put that ignoramus Bush into the White-House , so he could run the country into the ground. I guess it's not "terrorism" when Christians; use a fake war to drop bombs on innocent women and children who had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11?
Things must indeed change in, less pollution for example. This can easily be obtained by releasing repressed technologies. And Weed, you can even make cars and houses out of it, it isn't called God's gift from heaven for nothing.
Going back to the land would mean hard work everyday to sustain your life, leaving little room for free time.
It's really that simple. If you want to stop working your crummy job, take a risk, take a loan out and start your own business. If you make it you keep the profits, if you don't you go back to work and see less profits. It is so scary to see Americans like you who've never experienced a communist system talking out of their ass and showing no understanding of human nature or economics. I'm shocked at how calmly dumb you are, frankly.
You are very confused. You have no sense of what is going on in the world, you cannot understand what I present as facts VS thinking aloud, and you lack a basic understanding of what is humane and what is not. It's sad to me.
Be more specific in your videos when presenting your thoughts. Almost nothing of what you say is fact, about the only factually accurate thing you said is that the environment is degrading. So what is your realistic solution to that? If worst comes to worst in America we will have anarchy, riots, and extreme violence. And then what, how will a new world order coming out of the most realistic worst case scenario for capitalism's end be any better than what we now have?
What are you talking about? Why does manufacturing have to come to an end? And if it hypothetically it came to an end, how would society be better off with mass unemployment and a return to subsistence farming? And how will competitive human nature and man's desire to find the easiest way out be channeled in a system other than the free market? The reason the profit goes to the owners is because unlike ur dolt of a brain, they had the courage to stick their neck out and create profit.
You need to understand the difference between capitalism and corporatism. Capitalism is an economic theory. Corporatism is a legal fiction. Your explanation of capitalism and corporatism is seriously flawed. You misconstrue capitalism with corporatism. You can have capitalism without having corporations. As legal entities, corporations can and should be closely regulated and limited in scope and duration. Do yourself a favor and learn the difference between the two.
I kept it simple. They are related--you do not have corporatism (corporate power ruling over the peolple) in a truly demoncratic system. I am not interested in definition, I am interested in reality. corporatism thrives in a Capitalist society, plain and simple.
Corporatism is nothing close to capitalism. If you don't understand that, you'll never understand a free market economy and it's underpinnings. If you hate capitalism, your going to really love fascism. A 'truly democratic system' is nothing short of mob rule. We are not a democracy, we are a constitutional republic. I don't suppose you know the difference? You've kept it simple, alright. So simple that you've totally failed to understand reality. Take the blinders off your reality might improve
I try to keep things simple but that doesn't always please everyone, obviously. The full statement would be: "We are living in a Capitalist society which I believe is evolving into Corporatism." Based on everything I was saying, you honestly believe that I would like Fascism? I assume that was just a jab that you didn't mean seriously, but I take offence to that. And like I say, it makes no sense to what I was saying; Fascism is elitist control over the populace...
Listen, different people view Democracy in different ways, just as Democracy can take on a different face in different places and at different times. In the positive sense, Democracy is (in theory to some) a chance for equality within a political scheme. Personally, I do not trust any political system. I believe I made that clear in the video. I kept it too simple to understand reality? You really mean to say, too simple for you to understand me. Duly noted.
The classic definition of democracy is mob rule, and the founders of this country resoundingly rejected it. We elect our representatives through a democratic process, but that is a far cry from being a 'democracy.' It is exactly the distrust of the political system that convinced the founders to limit the size and scope of gov't and to keep the control over it in the hands of the people. And yes, I do understand what you are simply saying, you have no grasp of reality.
Keeping it simple doesn't make it simple. Your views are just simple, and incomplete as you must admit. What you are advocating is a capitalist free society. Do you really think that would put an end to corporatism? Be honest, that's just ludicrous, and you've given no clue as to what would replace capitalism. I can tell you what would fill the void would be fascism, whether you like it or not.
Amanda Palmer recently brought in $17,000 in less than 24 hours. She and her fans/followers designed a product and put it up for sale. Web services are going to emerge which amplify that model. We're at the dawn of a new age in capitalism.
Not in the long term. We can only destroy so many forest, wipe out so many echo systems (they cannot magically appear by planting new trees.) We cannot keep polluting. We cannot keep dirtying water. We cannot keep wiping out wildlife. We cannot keep creating cancer-causing radio waves. We cannot keep mounting the stress on the human psyche. There is a breaking point with any extreme, and I think that we have arrived.
If people don't like dirty water, dead wildlife, radiowaves, etc. they can organize businesses which do not do those things. Information technology not only makes it easier to show people what's wrong, it lowers the barriers to entry, making it easier for people to actually do something.
Ummm...we're talking about the Capitalist system here, not individual companies. The system is doing this. We have detroyed too much as it is, and the echo systems will take time to return (and they will not be the same.) But we are headed to destruction if we keep on the road we've been on, but luckily I believe it may now be collapsing. If not now, it will soon.
To think that capitalism will go away is to think that people won't work in their best interest. Capitalism is best for you. To think that the government can do better is to think you'd be better off if there were just one corporation. You have more control over society in a capitalist system than in a socialist system.
Giving up on capitalism is awfully premature when we just gained this amazing technology of the web which can make it work so much more efficiently.
I'm not sure we need any system that limits us at all. Having representatives is one thing. Largely this is a psychological problem (the system does not physically exist.) And through this change, how people think will change. Hopefully, we will evolve beyond the desire to be dependent upon any system of power. Deep down inside, we are spiritual beings who desire freedom and connection. Not servitude and disconnection (those things could only be desired from fear.) The future is unwritten.
Capitalism does not limit you, and I don't think anyone desires dependency. I agree that the way people think will change, but that will only lead to them being more active participants in a capitalistic system.
It only doesn't limit you if you are immoral. Otherwise, with luck and taking chances, you *can* find success...but success in something that is spiritually wrong. It is limiting to the inner self always. And very harmful.
So, by taking chances and succeeding, I am limiting my inner self? In what way is capitalism immoral? Do you have a job? Is it immoral for your employer to pay you?
What are the limits and morals I should impose on myself?
Stephan Harper has no fucking backbone whatsoever. He is a fucking pawn!
p1ippers 11 months ago
you seem a bit wishy washy... BUT YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT! props to you. I totally agree. you're cool.
and it "it's ridiculous".
scottfree1974 1 year ago
I think we're seeing the end of you.
Miatacrosser 1 year ago
The U.S. population is 330 million. It's less than 5% of world's population. Yet consumes 25% of the world's energy resources, 30% of the world's natural resources, 15% of the world's clean water, has the highest per ca-pita drug abuse, obesity, diabetes, incarceration, gun deaths, one of the highest infant mortality and capital punishment rates (2nd only to China). It's on it's death bed watching American Idol and Xbox.
loveruleshate 1 year ago
governments only real purpose is to protect our liberties what we need is a world without government. a world of "people" a world without the ever presence of a corporate technological puppeteer. this is the moment where either we sit down and watch the tube or walk away.
drumdadio 1 year ago
I see humanity operating in a hierarchical pyramidal system when I think we operate better as a cellular based system where no one person dictates to the other. We collectively work it through. Govt's have to be a service for the people, not manipulating them. They should be run by the very best specialists in the country, not popular elected no bodies... Volunteers who are the best in their field of expertise, not snakes who manage to weasel their way to the top through manipulation. Ethics!!
masternumber22 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@masternumber22 Geneticist have already proven that "White" genes are all recessive genes; which nature is rapidly eliminating from the DNA pool. Eventually there won't be anymore greedy, ignorant, racist bigots left to worry about."
Right-wing idiots put that ignoramus Bush into the White-House , so he could run the country into the ground. I guess it's not "terrorism" when Christians; use a fake war to drop bombs on innocent women and children who had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11?
loveruleshate 1 year ago
Thank you, much appreciated. :)
Neurolanis 2 years ago
Very good points, man, as always.
Afraid of human-rights groups, eh? That seems to be the case of most governments these days. Rotten scumbags, all of them.
DerrickCole 2 years ago
Thanks. Had technical problems, or would have replied sooner. Yeah, pollies are players. They're not in it with the right drive/mindset.
Neurolanis 2 years ago
Yeah right, are you with those con men who vote botted my channel the last time?
Neurolanis 2 years ago
You do know that de-industrialisation is the agenda of the Illuminati?
ObsessiveDetailer 2 years ago
Things must indeed change in, less pollution for example. This can easily be obtained by releasing repressed technologies. And Weed, you can even make cars and houses out of it, it isn't called God's gift from heaven for nothing.
Going back to the land would mean hard work everyday to sustain your life, leaving little room for free time.
There is no Kapitalism left, the game is rigged!
T4L0NNL 2 years ago
It's really that simple. If you want to stop working your crummy job, take a risk, take a loan out and start your own business. If you make it you keep the profits, if you don't you go back to work and see less profits. It is so scary to see Americans like you who've never experienced a communist system talking out of their ass and showing no understanding of human nature or economics. I'm shocked at how calmly dumb you are, frankly.
gendna2 2 years ago
You are very confused. You have no sense of what is going on in the world, you cannot understand what I present as facts VS thinking aloud, and you lack a basic understanding of what is humane and what is not. It's sad to me.
Neurolanis 2 years ago
Be more specific in your videos when presenting your thoughts. Almost nothing of what you say is fact, about the only factually accurate thing you said is that the environment is degrading. So what is your realistic solution to that? If worst comes to worst in America we will have anarchy, riots, and extreme violence. And then what, how will a new world order coming out of the most realistic worst case scenario for capitalism's end be any better than what we now have?
gendna2 2 years ago
What are you talking about? Why does manufacturing have to come to an end? And if it hypothetically it came to an end, how would society be better off with mass unemployment and a return to subsistence farming? And how will competitive human nature and man's desire to find the easiest way out be channeled in a system other than the free market? The reason the profit goes to the owners is because unlike ur dolt of a brain, they had the courage to stick their neck out and create profit.
gendna2 2 years ago
You need to understand the difference between capitalism and corporatism. Capitalism is an economic theory. Corporatism is a legal fiction. Your explanation of capitalism and corporatism is seriously flawed. You misconstrue capitalism with corporatism. You can have capitalism without having corporations. As legal entities, corporations can and should be closely regulated and limited in scope and duration. Do yourself a favor and learn the difference between the two.
bbburton 2 years ago
I kept it simple. They are related--you do not have corporatism (corporate power ruling over the peolple) in a truly demoncratic system. I am not interested in definition, I am interested in reality. corporatism thrives in a Capitalist society, plain and simple.
Neurolanis 2 years ago
Corporatism is nothing close to capitalism. If you don't understand that, you'll never understand a free market economy and it's underpinnings. If you hate capitalism, your going to really love fascism. A 'truly democratic system' is nothing short of mob rule. We are not a democracy, we are a constitutional republic. I don't suppose you know the difference? You've kept it simple, alright. So simple that you've totally failed to understand reality. Take the blinders off your reality might improve
bbburton 2 years ago
I try to keep things simple but that doesn't always please everyone, obviously. The full statement would be: "We are living in a Capitalist society which I believe is evolving into Corporatism." Based on everything I was saying, you honestly believe that I would like Fascism? I assume that was just a jab that you didn't mean seriously, but I take offence to that. And like I say, it makes no sense to what I was saying; Fascism is elitist control over the populace...
Neurolanis 2 years ago
Listen, different people view Democracy in different ways, just as Democracy can take on a different face in different places and at different times. In the positive sense, Democracy is (in theory to some) a chance for equality within a political scheme. Personally, I do not trust any political system. I believe I made that clear in the video. I kept it too simple to understand reality? You really mean to say, too simple for you to understand me. Duly noted.
Neurolanis 2 years ago
The classic definition of democracy is mob rule, and the founders of this country resoundingly rejected it. We elect our representatives through a democratic process, but that is a far cry from being a 'democracy.' It is exactly the distrust of the political system that convinced the founders to limit the size and scope of gov't and to keep the control over it in the hands of the people. And yes, I do understand what you are simply saying, you have no grasp of reality.
bbburton 2 years ago
Keeping it simple doesn't make it simple. Your views are just simple, and incomplete as you must admit. What you are advocating is a capitalist free society. Do you really think that would put an end to corporatism? Be honest, that's just ludicrous, and you've given no clue as to what would replace capitalism. I can tell you what would fill the void would be fascism, whether you like it or not.
bbburton 2 years ago
Nobody can set out a plan for you. EVERYBODY knows, what we have now is not good. This is a false life.
GnarFish666 2 years ago
dude ur a dumbass
MrCrazyyfool32 2 years ago
Thanks for clarifying that.
Neurolanis 2 years ago
Amanda Palmer recently brought in $17,000 in less than 24 hours. She and her fans/followers designed a product and put it up for sale. Web services are going to emerge which amplify that model. We're at the dawn of a new age in capitalism.
theantirobot 2 years ago
Not in the long term. We can only destroy so many forest, wipe out so many echo systems (they cannot magically appear by planting new trees.) We cannot keep polluting. We cannot keep dirtying water. We cannot keep wiping out wildlife. We cannot keep creating cancer-causing radio waves. We cannot keep mounting the stress on the human psyche. There is a breaking point with any extreme, and I think that we have arrived.
Neurolanis 2 years ago
If people don't like dirty water, dead wildlife, radiowaves, etc. they can organize businesses which do not do those things. Information technology not only makes it easier to show people what's wrong, it lowers the barriers to entry, making it easier for people to actually do something.
theantirobot 2 years ago
Ummm...we're talking about the Capitalist system here, not individual companies. The system is doing this. We have detroyed too much as it is, and the echo systems will take time to return (and they will not be the same.) But we are headed to destruction if we keep on the road we've been on, but luckily I believe it may now be collapsing. If not now, it will soon.
Neurolanis 2 years ago
Comment removed
theantirobot 2 years ago
"we're talking about the Capitalist system here, not individual companies"
That makes no sense at all. That's like saying the forest creates oxygen but individual trees play no roll.
theantirobot 2 years ago
To think that capitalism will go away is to think that people won't work in their best interest. Capitalism is best for you. To think that the government can do better is to think you'd be better off if there were just one corporation. You have more control over society in a capitalist system than in a socialist system.
Giving up on capitalism is awfully premature when we just gained this amazing technology of the web which can make it work so much more efficiently.
theantirobot 2 years ago
I'm not sure we need any system that limits us at all. Having representatives is one thing. Largely this is a psychological problem (the system does not physically exist.) And through this change, how people think will change. Hopefully, we will evolve beyond the desire to be dependent upon any system of power. Deep down inside, we are spiritual beings who desire freedom and connection. Not servitude and disconnection (those things could only be desired from fear.) The future is unwritten.
Neurolanis 2 years ago
Capitalism does not limit you, and I don't think anyone desires dependency. I agree that the way people think will change, but that will only lead to them being more active participants in a capitalistic system.
theantirobot 2 years ago
It only doesn't limit you if you are immoral. Otherwise, with luck and taking chances, you *can* find success...but success in something that is spiritually wrong. It is limiting to the inner self always. And very harmful.
Neurolanis 2 years ago
So, by taking chances and succeeding, I am limiting my inner self? In what way is capitalism immoral? Do you have a job? Is it immoral for your employer to pay you?
What are the limits and morals I should impose on myself?
theantirobot 2 years ago
p.s. ever heard of Benjamin fulford?
very interesting guy check him out,he has a blog under his name and youtube vids,so yeah check him out....
eeleimmij 2 years ago
I'll check him out.
Neurolanis 2 years ago
good to see you back,dont work to hard. as always very thought provoking . thanks
eeleimmij 2 years ago
Wow, thank you. :)
Neurolanis 2 years ago