Added: 3 years ago
From: AuroraKismet
Views: 1,972
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • especially when hemp, and infact marijuana is a LEGAL CROP! (yes, i know, in china no less)

  • cotton...again. why do people grow what is arguably one of the most water intensive

    crops in arid environments.

  • It will continue until China lowers its population down dramatically. They should be below 100 million for their country, or less.

  • Hogwash.

    And double hogwash to your username &agenda.

  • Yeah, its obviously you didn't watch the video. If I was ever to have an agenda, it would be to wake people like you up. The only hogwash here is your inability to reason with the truth.

  • I can handle the truth.That's why I approved your comment.i've known since Paul Ehrlich and reading Margaret Sanger about the Euro-American pupolation control agenda.

    But you don't know about me and assume too much.

  • I've taken approval off os you can spew all you want to.Pay attention to two things first,please

    Rule of Engagement #1 -Know your opponent

    Overpopulation is a racist myth.I will point out this report isfrom the VOA,the offical propaganda organ of the US Gov.

    If Asians or Africans went around saying the world needs less White people,war would break out.But it's okay for Euro-Americans to spread this racist lie.

  • #2 A wise man will not insult me and a fool can only try.

    So go ahead,say all you want inasmuch as YouTube's comment limit will allow.But don't try to insult me again because you can't.You will only look like a fool.

    I'm not going to argue with you,I've heard all that the population reduction crowd has put forward for the past 39 years.

    Same racist,selfish,elitist agenda as it was back then.

    Have at it.Enjoy your monolgue.

  • @AuroraKismet, first there are too many of ALL races, not just asians. The whole world needs to lower its population down with birth restrictions and mandatory birth control. Do you like to see kids born to alcoholics, drug addicts, pedophiles, mentally ill people??? That is what is happening and it needs to stop for the betterment of humanity and our communities. It is no myth when 1/2 the world is living in poverty or worse.

  • @controlpopulation

    What's racist about it, is saying there's too many Asians. So what that half the world is Asian?It's not zero-sum.Over 3 billion Asians doesn't keep Africa from adding its own additional billion by 2050

    China government was deceived,and dishonored Mao,and uses huge pop as scapegoat for their own incompetence

    There is not too many of all races.Actually we are just 1 race,the human race.We are already mixing the races,so we are 1 race

    By growing DENSER we can keep increasing

  • Its you who tells me I have an agenda, on a post I made over a month ago, and you tell me I'm spewing? If anything, maybe you should take some of your own advice and NOT assume anything.

    OP is real in ALL races and for you to assume that because I am white, I have an agenda against another race, is quite pathetic. Oh, and racist!

    Its obvious you have been mis-informed about OP and I recommend you do a little more research before you discount it. Population must be lowered humanely.

  • @controlpopulation

    Whether you will admit to saying it or not, there's an old book title, "Too Many Asians." That's racist disrespect for Asians, as they have every right to be so many. So half the world is Asian. So what? If half the world was Chinese, they still would have as much right to enjoy having all their God-given precious babies.

    Didn't Hitler pretty well discredit eugenics? What then is the alternative? We have to let EVERYBODY breed naturally. Welcome babies push out as they come!

  • @pronatalist, Its not racist, its fact. If it was so racist, why did the chinese govt impose the one child rule? Are they racist against their own people? It doesn't matter if someone is chinese or not, any race that allows their people to multiply unhindered, needs to learn to reduce their numbers. Same goes for india, who breed like rabbits but live in filth. And again., I don't believe in your god that has you thinking delusional.

  • @controlpopulation

    I agree with people of India reproducing babies naturally like rabbits, as quite many people do not believe in using birth control. I welcome Muslims to reproduce like baby factories. But why just them? So they can take over the world? The body's reproductive system should be respected like other vital systems, to do its thing. I have long advocated the entire human race multiply naturally and unhindered, so that more people may live

    It's our human birthright to be numerous!

  • @controlpopulation

    Why China 1-child tyranny? I suspect western contraceptive imperialists leaned on China to get some handle upon its surging human population, for fear perhaps of As goes China, so goes the world? If the world's most populous country lets its huge pop expand wildly, what does that portend for the planet, as other countries are encouraged to do the same at the same time? But I already advocate a DENSER WORLD, and humans weren't designed to use birth control, so let us GROW WILD

  • @controlpopulation China is a huge country , are you seriously suggesting it can only support 100 million people ?. Over population is a problem if it keeps continuing but its also related to our lifestyles which currently put too much demand on finite resources. We all need to live more sustainably and live in closed loop or smaller input systems.

  • @hablerz Yes China is a big country. But, if they wanted a country that was clean, environmentally friendly, non-hostile to animals and nature, then yes China is severely overpopulated. Much of china consists of deserts, mountains and tundra that do very little to help support a large population. China's future will depend on it LOWERING its population. The ones calling to add population are delusional globalists who only look at dollar signs. No one benefits from overpopulation.

  • @controlpopulation By your reasoning countries like England , Nederlands and Monaco and India should also practice population control.

  • @hablerz , no shit. every country in the world should practice controlling population. Good to know you found the answer without really even seeing it.

  • @controlpopulation Yes but what exactly does controlling population mean ? One child per family ?. I thought alot of western countries already have falling birth rates.

  • @controlpopulation Yes but what exactly does controlling population mean ? One child per family ?. I thought alot of western countries already have falling birth rates.

  • @hablerz, it means enacting birth restrictions worldwide. We are at 8 billion people, not 6.8 billion like our stupid govts try to tell us, and the chaos around the world will only get worse with more people. Strict laws need to be enforced that stop people from having children until our population falls to a sustainable level. Only first and second generation citizens of western countries have a falling rate. Immigration is negating any fall in population.

  • @controlpopulation

    Do you know what inalienable rights means, like it says we have given by God, in our U.S. Declaration of Independence? Government has no right to take these rights to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of happiness. Right to life includes right to reproduce, which can't be taken away by some bogus, contrived population "crisis."

    With respect for nature, where is the respect for the natural flow of human life, the natural reproductive rhythms, for fertility making lots of babies?

  • @pronatalist Since I don't believe in god, I don't believe in your fake inalienable rights. Its not a right to have kids pronatalist, that is a false misguided view by the catholic church. If they had any morals at all, they would provide birth control to the third world so they can lower their numbers and live a more humane life. Pure insanity coming out of rome so their babble shouldnt be listened too.

  • @controlpopulation

    Then upon what basis do you hang human rights, or do you not even care about human rights and freedom? Surely you don't trust the corrupt politicians to make your decisions for you? Our U.S. Declaration of Independence does make reference to our Creator (God), so without acceptance of God, our basis for "inalienable" human rights, is reduced possible to the whim of corrupt government.

    I am not Catholic, and even nature tells you humans have the right to reproduce children.

  • @pronatalist , there will be no freedom eventually if you don't stop overpopulation. Govts will HAVE TO crack down even more on our freedoms because they won't be able to control the population. You better wake up.

    Nature allows us to have children but even nature controls its animal population with disease and famine. Nature will never allow one animal to get too plentiful. Your answer is in nature if you care to look. We as humans have the right to choose our path. OP is the wrong one

  • @controlpopulation

    If only perfect parents had children, the human race would have went extinct long ago. Don't you know it takes at least around a billion births a decade, just to maintain our present human pop size? Or do you want to see us atrophy and our technologies crumble, as critical mass pops fade away? So let parents solve their problems, but also let them breed!

    Don't you get it? There's no need to "control" human pop, for human pops self-accommodate,especially with more pronatalism

  • @controlpopulation

    Why do you want to "fix" what God already has a better answer for? Why should we subscribe to your religion of pagan radical "environmentalism," or whatever -ism you wish to say it is?

    Pronatalism is the simple elegant answer, too simple for secular "educated" minds to understand. It answers What do we do to bring the pop under control? Uh, nothing. How do we enforce it? We don't.

    Nature isn't limiting us. Aren't humans now among the most populous of large mammals? What OP?

  • @controlpopulation

    No, every country should be expected to do its part to help the world hold more people, especially by populating denser via their natural increase, their very own children

    It should be very understandable that people have very good reasons, and every right to refuse to use any shoddy anti-life method of "birth control." Population "control" violates the most basic and primal of human right to live and reproduce

    So what if we are really 8 billion? The world can hold far more

  • @pronatalist , the world doesn't need more people, it needs less people. The more people there are the worse it gets. If you had any idea about what overpopulation is doing to ALL countries of the world, you would know the world cannot and should not hold 8 billion people. Good try though.

  • @controlpopulation

    Another reason why we must respect people's rights to have children, is that human childbearing is a natural force of nature that is hard to control, and steadily grows more and more "uncontrollable," the more populous and youthful populations get. So get out of the way and let human numbers rise naturally!

    I welcome poor countries, Asia, Africa, everybody to naturally raise their numbers, for the greater good of the many. More human lives trumps a otherwise spacious planet.

  • @controlpopulation

    You bash against my God and against my Bible. And yet, haven't I given you many reasons for allowing human numbers to rise, other than just quoting scripture verse? Have you no ability to reason? Even claimed atheists accept benefit to humanity in letting numbers rise, for progress of human race.

    Should I care what you want? If so, don't I have to accept you existing, and all the children and grandchildren you may have?

    The world needs more people, so that we can reproduce!

  • @controlpopulation

    In some sense, of course most countries already have "more than enough" people. We are already so dense, we need to have indoor flush toilets, to properly and sanitarily process the rising rivers of human wastes flowing in the sewers hidden under our growing cities. But what's wrong with having the convenience of toilets?

    But when you consider the sacred immense value of each and every human life, and most people want or end up having children, reasons to GROW become clearer

  • @controlpopulation

    The world can clearly hold, or be made to hold, far more people. Whether we supposedly "need" more people, isn't that somewhat irrelevant? As we speak, each second, another 4 or 5 babies are born. It's not something we can reasonably "control." Our ancestors thought family size to be "uncontrollable." Considering how awful the shoddy contraceptives are, it should still be called uncontrollable

    The world should hold 8 billion and more, so that there can be place for everybody

  • @controlpopulation

    So are you calling me a delusional globalist? I call for natural population growth and populating the planet denser, not so much for globalist profit reasons, but for the rights of individuals, and because it's very good and understandable, people want their precious darling babies, regardless how high population may grow.

    How can we enjoy having our wonderful God-given babies, in a world with so many alive already? Isn't it obvious? Let the planet populate denser and denser

  • very interesting video. peace2u!

  • the waters of life.

  • desertification is dehydration!!

    let us keep watering our flowers!

    dehydration sucks! Really Sucks!!!!!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more