You guys should know that maxishine is a rich bastard...lol
People that say he should buy a car are idiots. Do you think he doesn't have one? In one of his videos, I managed to catch a glimpse of his mercedes benz car keys. Haters will hate. Stop being Jealous people.
Hope your not playing like this! I mean automatic when you can go manual.. Looks boring just pressing arrows and space for handbrake! I do envy the setup with multiple screens!
@Darkteammadfiz Well to be honest it will kill the performance yes, however a lot of people do this for the immersion you get from the added viewing space, and so you could always lower the settings. Of course you will lose quality that is a given but it is a trade off some people are willing to make.
@rockgod2131 Nah but youmadbro. LOL if you got money to waste be my guest but in my personal opionion i would never dump that much money into a pc that will outdated 3-4 years.
Can you put one monitor on top of the other? Cause I was thinking about upgrading to an HD6870 cause I have a 1920 x 1200 res but to combine with a 1920 x 1080 it can only happen vertically right?
Is there any way i could separete screens in driver so there want be height diference in pixels on edge of the 2 screens so driver card thing that there is screen even where is the border but dont display it.Like 7600*1600 would became 8000*1600 but that 2 times 200*1600 betwen screens would be invisible..it would be more natural picture.
Second what natho369 says, lame truth but the people who buy all the new expensive stuff help the older stuff get cheaper so thanks, computers are just plain good fun.
Even though people have a go at this guy for wasting money building these rigs, I don't blame him. If you got the money, do it. This would be one the things I would do "if I won the lottery". Keep building these amazing machines man!
yawn,,, wow u can see more stuff . u can also get fuckin MERKED by me while you are busy looking in your peripheral and not paying attention to whats in front of you . Buy a fucking nice car , dont drop 8k n shit on a monitor that only decreases your gaming potential and a pc that cant do anything more than a 2k budget pc, because there are no games that require balls like that yet. I guess if spending your money stupidly was the point of this video, you surely accomplished it. eyefinity = fail
@Scortech make sure they didnt default to a lower resolution (like 1280x1024) and also, if its only the 2 outer monitors that are stretched, some games do that on purpose to get more of a peripheral vision type view
@TitusRTeh1337Bassist Thanks for the reply Titus. I managed to fix it in Dirt 2, I tried GTA 4 and that "peripheral vision type view" on the outer monitors is there, Very annoying. I guess there is no way to fix that,??
@Scortech not as far as i know :\...BUT HEY! WHAT THE HELL. YOU HAVE 3 24" MONITORS SET UP FOR GAMING! HOW MANY PEOPLE DO YOU THINK CAN SAY THAT? :D stretched peripherals on some games > playing on one monitor ANY DAY
@fernandobo009 ohhhhh i dont know if you call having a life getting the things and excesses you want in this world and ' life' then i would say he does. if i were to call having a ' life' , hating on those that do have the things they want when i can't , then i would call you having a life, wouldn't I , you hating bitch
hahaha im not hating im just asking and for your information i can get a pc like this if i want to.. i already have one all i need is 3 monitors dumb ass. seriously dont open your mouth if u dont know anything
The only thing this shows me is that eyefinity is just a waste, look at the two other screens barely do you see any more than you really need to, you get small edges of the track, you want to play on a huge screen? Just get a regular 60 inch. Eyefinity really feels useless.
I like that, you call me an idiot but your best defense is "Well it costs more and it doesn't curve" really? Does it matter? Two extra screens that barely provide anything that a sixty inch screen couldn't, is a waste of money. Eyefinity is useless.
@harrier125 LMFAO What more evidence would you possibly need? It's all in the video, please show me where in this video were the two extra screens vital to playing the game? Unless you're using eyefinity for anything but playing straight video games it's useless. Also, by the way, I run an ati 5770 :O
@harrier125 LMFAO Because I can see on the sides of me? That would make me a hardcore gamer because instead of looking forward at one monitor I now have three to look at, two of which really provides very little to no assistance in the game.
Yeah, no I'm just not stupid enough to think it's a reason to shell out six hundred more dollars for two matching monitors just so I can be "Immersed" with more screens to look at.
Yes, totally >.< That's why my 57770 is in my PCI-E slot!
And remember, 3 monitors = cheaper than 60 inch 1080p TV, so if you're going to start QQing about money, at least make sure you haven't fucked your argument from the start.
57770? Fail, you obviously Googled an ATI card, seen a 5770 but failed at realising there is only 2 7's.
Or, you're lying, and covering up for your jealousy ;)
Waste of money? Nah.
Hinders your ability? If you see something moving at the side of your screen, you turn around, who said you have to stare at the side, if you see something move, you can react faster, you're clearly trying very hard to find reasons it's not good for gaming, but the fact is, it is.
@harrier125 Find it yourself, you want it? Go look for it.
Oh totally :)
In your opinion.
So you mean to tell me keeping track of three different monitors while you sit what, maybe ten inches away is easier than keeping track of what's going on in one screen? Yeah sorry don't think so, smaller screen = less to keep track of = faster, easier, and better. Large/Multiple screens = More to keep track of = Slower, harder, and average.
@808Productionz Aww, you're not giving a link because you lied :(
In my opinion? Nope.
As I've said, you don't keep track of all 3, if you see something move at the side (Such as my fingers in my mirror) you react to it, you do realise that's what humans do, yes?
Bigger FOV = Able to react faster, no slowdown (Unless your Username beings with 808 XD), pro.
Smaller = More likely to be killed from the side, no slowdown, average.
@harrier125 I gave you all the information for you to google it and find out for yourself :) if you choose not to go look, that's your prerogative.
:) Yes in your opinion.
And then it turns out to be nothing you face back in front of you and you're dead because that little thing that moved on the side of you that you weren't keeping track of was a speck of the environment lol.
:) Then it just so happens that competitive gamers use smaller TV's for no reason?
@harrier125 Only when stupid people who demand things don't go get them :)
Please read the statement, you react to things you may see in the corner of your eye, you turn that way and it happens to be nothing, oh look there's a guy aiming at you now from the way you "were" facing you turn back, oops you're dead. ;) Nope all of your points are moot no need for desperation :).
And actually they use smaller TV's for faster reaction time :)
@808Productionz You had the link, you didn't give me it, you didn't have a reason to not supply the link when I asked you for it, apart from the fact that you're lying.
To be nothing? How can I react to something which is not there?
Also, if I DID turn over there (Which I wouldn't you don't usually react to NOTHING) I would still be able to see the person in at the side, so I'd turn back.
You can get big TV's with fast responses, they're expensive, and they usually use them.
@harrier125 I didn't have the link, I googled a TV, found one and listed enough for you to do your own research. If you think i'm lying, lol that's fine, that's your opinion, but if you're going to bitch and whine about the subject don't bring it up?
Boy, with all this intelligence bashing, and you can't comprehend that, nothing as in, you're not going to shoot it and get a kill, nothing. Which you wouldn't have to do with ONE monitor.
Not the TV's reaction time, the persons. LOL you're mental.
@808Productionz Still bringing up the TV? Tell you what, I'll be the one with the brains and ignore that top part, seeing as after multiple times in asking you, you still go on about it.
That second sentence made no sense.
Yea, I guess I didn't understand that one right (Notice how I admit it, unlike your self).
@harrier125 LOL Actually, had you followed what that comment was responding to, it would have been strangely on-topic. You said you didn't understand and I told you why :) see? On topic.
@harrier125 Notice though, how I didn't say anything about his set up, and yet you say I'm jealous? LOL His set up is pretty badass. Eyefinity is useless for gaming, which is what I said, which was my point, which you're to stupid to actually get. Though, it's hilarious, you haven't mentioned one thing that games benefit from eyefinity except "Immersion" which games have been doing with one monitor pretty fine for years now.
@808Productionz Okay, so your point is it's not fit for gaming. Why would having a bigger FOV, being able to see your opponents without having to turn to face them be bad for gaming?
Ah, right, it isn't.
PS. That's greater immersion, notice how 3D is coming along, that offers better immersion too, yet I don't see you QQing about 3D.
@harrier125 A bigger field of view = More area to keep track of, unless your eyes come out of your socket when you play or you sit a food five to six feet away from your three monitors it's useless.
PS: I wouldn't sit in front of a TV for anything but a movie wearing glasses looking like a dumbass, if that's what you enjoy doing because you feel it "Immerses" you that's your prerogative, it's useless for gaming.
@808Productionz And, again, please at least provide a small amount of evidence that it's useless for gaming, all you've said so far is "2 much 2 kep trak of!", I've proved that wrong, bring on some more.
@808Productionz Also, just so you know, right now I'm looking at my screen, and I can see my self typing in the mirrow, despite it being at the side of my eyes (Farther round that these monitors curve) so that's proof that these do work.
If your eyes are fucked, then I suppose this isn't any good for you.
@harrier125 In the mirrow, really? Never heard of those, anyways. Note that I said "GAMES" not "INTERNET BROWSING" I never said that they didn't work, I even said they work better for graphics design and businesses. They're about as useless for gaming as 3D is.
@808Productionz But they're not, I've proved that, as I've said, I'm looking at my monitor right now, and even though I am touch typing and watching the screen, I can still at the side of my eyes see my fingers moving, I'm not even concentrating on the mirror, I just see it.
And Maxishine's video of him doing that too is proof.
It appears you're unwilling to admit that you're incorrect, which I find childish.
@808Productionz Not everyone has space for a projector, son.
Doesn't hinder ability, I've all ready proved that.
Beside sim games? But there games, and you said it's useless for gaming, it would appear you're trying to narrow my ground to argue on, ain't gonna happen, son ;)
@harrier125 No but you have space for three big ass monitors? Right.
You did? Where?
Sim games aren't average run of the mill games, you don't pick up and play sim games like you would crysis, or Dirt, which is what I also said later in that comment I quoted.
@harrier125 Then I'm sure you have enough space for a projector :)
Yeah? Bill gates made a fortune, so that must mean everyone can do the same exact thing and get the same exact outcome. Sorry, doesn't work that way, normal people don't pick up and play Sims.
@808Productionz For a projector I'd need to clear a whole wall and a space for the projector. Remember when I asked you to think? I wasn't being sarcastic...
I'm a normal person, I went and picked up a sim, I've played LockOn, RailWorks 2 and Farm Simulator, I have no interest in Trains or Farms, yet I've played them both.
And I know many others who have done the same.
Your arguments are becoming so petty, simply stating that no one does that isn't evidence.
@harrier125 And I'm assuming your desk space is so close to the ceiling that the only thing that can fit inbetween that space is three monitors? "Really?"
Awesome? But that wasn't the point, people don't pick up Sim games to hardcore game on them, you don't pick up Falcon 5.0 because you're going to hardcore game on it, you don't pick up Flight Simulator X because you're going to hardcore game on it. Simulation games aren't run of the mill games, sorry.
@808Productionz If I'm sitting infront of the wall, how on earth can a projector project through me? My PC is right at the wall.
I played LockOn A LOT, and there are many groups and clans which DO hardcore game on sims, I played Flashpoint for a long time and so many people still do.
They are, and I've proved that, I hardcore gamed on LockOn and Flashpoint + ArmA.
@harrier125 Hm "Operation Flashpoint is a first person tactical military video game series for the PC, Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3. It consists of three titles. As of October 2010[update], only the first two have been released." :O I guess CoD and BF are both Sims to.
@808Productionz I was talking about the original flashpoint, moron, that's why I said "People still play it" as in it's been out for a long time and it's still popular.
@harrier125 LMFAO Again "Operation Flashpoint is a first person tactical military video game series for the PC, Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3. It consists of three titles. As of October 2010[update], only the first two have been released." I'm guessing CoD and BF can count as Sims to no? :O
@harrier125 It's a shame you missed the "Series" part of that sentence.
It's not, if it were a simulator, like all the other simulator games it would have been "First person tactical military simulator" as you said, yet it's not. I didn't make up the rules :) i just beat you with them.
@808Productionz The first one was made by different people, the second one was taken over by other people who did not work on the first.
Just because the second one isn't tactical doesn't mean the first isn't, you're clearly desperate, trying to say something can't be a simulation if it's sequel isn't a simulation too.
@harrier125 Again HUGE important word was "Series" it wasn't describing the genre of one game but all of them, l2r.
I didn't say it wasn't a simulation the description of the series genre said it wasn't a simulation game, and if it doesn't say it's a simulation game, it must not be a simulation game. :O
@808Productionz It is a simulation game, I've played it, you haven't, my father bought it for me the week it came out, yours didn't.
I played it for years, one or two bullets killed you, you had to use your map to navigate, no waypoints, no nothing, you could turn them on, but it's a simulation, you don't usually do that :)
@harrier125 Sure in your opinion maybe, but the quote didn't say simulation did it?
Awesome? Sounds like Ghost Recon to me :) I guess GR is a Simulation to, oh and CoD since one or two bullets killed you and there really are no real way points. Oh maybe BF2 to hmmm.
@808Productionz You were proved wrong, and I was right, you still argue that it's not a simulator despite multiple sources of professional game reviewers and multiple opinions and the actual creators saying it is XD
Also, yes, in those games a Sniper kills in one shot, but a pistol doesn't, a rifle doesn't.
And, there you go, depends on the gun, in flashpoint, 1 pistol bullet spells the end for you.
@808Productionz "Operation Flashpoint: Cold War Crisis, sometimes shortened to Operation Flashpoint, and abbreviated OFP, is a tactical shooter and battlefield simulator video game"
Aww, I guess you WERE wrong :(
Just like everything else, I guess XD
Rofl, now you're going to tell me Wikipedia and other sources I checked are all wrong just because you're too childish to admit that you were wrong, which, by the way, is pathetic, truly.
@808Productionz Oh, and just another thing to possibly make you realise how wrong you are, if a bigger FOV is distracting, why do competitive players in competitions turn the FOV to the max allowed?
I guess because they realise that they only need to see something at the side, not focus on it.
@harrier125 Notice how they're playing on smaller monitors, and they're not each playing on three monitors at the same time, the more you can see in ONE monitor the better, why? Because it's easier to FOCUS on ONE monitor than semi-focus on one and glance over at two others.
:) And another one of your arguments bites the dust /win
@808Productionz They play on small monitors because, as I've all ready told you, they aren't allowed to play on huge ones, they are given a setup, they don't bring there own, the only thing they can do is change the graphical settings, and, well, well, well, they seem to put the FOV to the highest!
Another argument bites the dust? Obviously you're getting quite anxious at how ownage I am.
@harrier125 Again, it's set high because it's easier to focus on one monitor rather than three. I'm sure they've been doing this a lot longer than eyefinity has been around. Hell it's what? Barely a year old? The more you can see on one monitor the better, the larger your monitor, the more there is to look at, the more time you spend glancing around the longer your reaction to things you aren't immediately looking at.
Lol You only wish you were nearly as good as I am :)
@808Productionz Funny, you say they prefer one monitor when they do better on 3 XD
You still don't understand the basic human eye, how pathetic can you get.
If you look at one monitor and focus on it, you are using all your attention on that monitor, and, guess what, the human eye (Those things in your eye sockets!) can still see things move at the side of your other monito
EPIC BEARD MAN! ;D
ChrizRedfield 1 month ago
I can spend 200 on a console and get the same enjoyment and look as he would probably spending close to 3K on a PC
thagrtstuvawltyme11 2 months ago
@thagrtstuvawltyme11 Enjoyment yes. Look? Never.
suprhero1 2 months ago
@thagrtstuvawltyme11 resolution
xbox360 max=1920×540
this machine max= 7680x1600 or 4800x2560
the4armedmonk 1 month ago
You should make a video with fraps a create a link to download it :) (i would like to see in mi pc)
MAJG 3 months ago
Anda ke jugar a teclas con todo ese ekipazo...manda webos
CDsDannyCDs 3 months ago
Could I do Eyefinity with three 70 inch screens?
1981z28camaro 3 months ago
@1981z28camaro there is no 70" screens
TheHalflife123 3 months ago
@TheHalflife123 lol, yes there is :-)
1981z28camaro 3 months ago
@1981z28camaro they're mostly TV:s and no one sane person plays with tv screen
TheHalflife123 3 months ago
@TheHalflife123 lol, I don't see why not :-)
1981z28camaro 3 months ago
if you see the HUD is just in one screen soo its prety the same sry
TheBogdaneatza 3 months ago
You guys should know that maxishine is a rich bastard...lol
People that say he should buy a car are idiots. Do you think he doesn't have one? In one of his videos, I managed to catch a glimpse of his mercedes benz car keys. Haters will hate. Stop being Jealous people.
akrasul 4 months ago
Hope your not playing like this! I mean automatic when you can go manual.. Looks boring just pressing arrows and space for handbrake! I do envy the setup with multiple screens!
Denstoradiskmaskinen 4 months ago
You Rich Bastard!
DieselGTX 5 months ago
(133,7)16 Views. lol
lXlNismo11lXl 5 months ago
sell those shit and get a real car ;)
MrAben1995 5 months ago
Meanwhile in Africa.
Creolesbackfire 5 months ago
@Creolesbackfire LOL!
iamnicompoop 3 months ago
were you got all this money :O?
TheMRpoloKING 5 months ago
Where the fuck do you get the money ffs. you must be a crack dealer
maranzano3255 6 months ago
Isn't it lagging to handle this with one GPU? Just the resolution should KO the graphics card oO
Darkteammadfiz 6 months ago
@Darkteammadfiz Well to be honest it will kill the performance yes, however a lot of people do this for the immersion you get from the added viewing space, and so you could always lower the settings. Of course you will lose quality that is a given but it is a trade off some people are willing to make.
Mike9042 5 months ago
@Mike9042 I think to best is just to have 2 graphics card. It won't lag much and it gives the horsepower to handle it without lag :)
Darkteammadfiz 5 months ago
i've bought a G27!!!But i still having just one HD5750,so i gonna play in just 1080p,Great stuff you have in there man!
Arthurzeiro 7 months ago
R U BILL GAETS?
Greddy147 7 months ago
console kiddies wish they could do this..
senad54 7 months ago
im from kuwait the most powerful currency and the most expensive country
smallville0forever 7 months ago
amazing setup i wish if i had only one 2560-1600 monitor it costs like 3000$ here in my country
keep up the good video bro
smallville0forever 7 months ago
@smallville0forever What country are you from? :)
wakeupitshere 7 months ago
how many computers does he have... like 3!
xxsolidsteelxx 7 months ago
nice setup cant wait untill i get my new setup ive been working on :D
cchhrrkkllee 7 months ago
Nvidia runs smoothier than ati to games...I dont know but ati has good performance and a little bit lag...
TheXtremeGamer90 7 months ago
@TheXtremeGamer90 Fanboy detected, as usual.
manonbeachfm 6 months ago
@manonbeachfm no no i am not a fanboy ! I have ati at this momment ! But previusly nvidia !
TheXtremeGamer90 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice driving. I can't play with keyboard! =\
GamerAndReviewer 7 months ago
Comment removed
GamerAndReviewer 7 months ago
5th^^
pcfreakable 7 months ago
Your computer is jesus.
HookLineSinner 8 months ago
Wow!
cryOzed 8 months ago
Overkill.
jayco941 8 months ago
@jayco941 You jelly bro?
rockgod2131 4 months ago
@rockgod2131 Nah but youmadbro. LOL if you got money to waste be my guest but in my personal opionion i would never dump that much money into a pc that will outdated 3-4 years.
jayco941 4 months ago
Can you put one monitor on top of the other? Cause I was thinking about upgrading to an HD6870 cause I have a 1920 x 1200 res but to combine with a 1920 x 1080 it can only happen vertically right?
Hrakleus 9 months ago
Nice setup, now all you need is a driving wheel and pedals
SHortstuFF911 9 months ago
@SHortstuFF911 he has...
5468295 8 months ago
how the hell do you afford this !?
xBuzz996 9 months ago
lol that's how i play dirt 2....for test drive unlimited 2 i use a controller
coolgames14 9 months ago
And your terrible at dirt 2.
aakburns 9 months ago
This moron was to dumb to get all three same monitors and an active display port to dvi adapter. Dumbass.
aakburns 9 months ago
I fucking hate when people dont put their stuff in a symmetric way. Put the silver monitor in the middle.
DarkNshY 9 months ago 38
@DarkNshY omg i was so thinking that
harvey288 9 months ago
@DarkNshY Yea i cant stand that people can be that ignorent.
vwxy20z 8 months ago
holy tits!
Mac4280 9 months ago
Is there any way i could separete screens in driver so there want be height diference in pixels on edge of the 2 screens so driver card thing that there is screen even where is the border but dont display it.Like 7600*1600 would became 8000*1600 but that 2 times 200*1600 betwen screens would be invisible..it would be more natural picture.
dzonikg 9 months ago
Second what natho369 says, lame truth but the people who buy all the new expensive stuff help the older stuff get cheaper so thanks, computers are just plain good fun.
slimmworker 10 months ago
the only game not censored in austrialia
TheAlexagius 10 months ago 13
Even though people have a go at this guy for wasting money building these rigs, I don't blame him. If you got the money, do it. This would be one the things I would do "if I won the lottery". Keep building these amazing machines man!
sebmeikle 10 months ago
@sebmeikle or had a good job
TheAlexagius 10 months ago
Heya there guys im thinking of going for a nice eyefinity setup, tho im not realy sure if this selfmade comp i've made can handle it:
Processor: Icore i7 960 ( 4 cores runs at 3,8GHz )
Mothercard: Asus Sabertooth X58
Ram: 8gb DDR3 1600MHz CL8
Videocard: Sapphire Radeon HD 6970 2gb
ajaeiful 10 months ago
@ajaeiful I hope your joking if the 5750 can run this ur 6970 will murder it.
kjizzle96 9 months ago
1280x720x75hz FTW!
nemtastic 10 months ago
Aww man..you shoulda left it on bonnet cam. Wheel usage woulda been a nice bonus ;)
But cool as fuck nonetheless!
toasteruk 10 months ago
aww all that and no wheel?
magnesium111 11 months ago
look at the cpu meter, its like chilling at almost no use
mine idles at 60% cpu usage on windows xp -_-
worldofurin 11 months ago
i see that more and more people want to get eyefinity and a lot have now eyeyfinity
Froanite 11 months ago
he Looks like Jesus
xtCHacking 11 months ago
top
hajesalfraq 11 months ago
how do you disable dx11
MultiAlliot 11 months ago
nice drifting skills
1000i10 11 months ago
i cant decide if that would be totaly awesome or just make me nauseated :X
raymondwolf 11 months ago
yawn,,, wow u can see more stuff . u can also get fuckin MERKED by me while you are busy looking in your peripheral and not paying attention to whats in front of you . Buy a fucking nice car , dont drop 8k n shit on a monitor that only decreases your gaming potential and a pc that cant do anything more than a 2k budget pc, because there are no games that require balls like that yet. I guess if spending your money stupidly was the point of this video, you surely accomplished it. eyefinity = fail
smok3able 11 months ago
@smok3able Jealous much? :D
Lyrixish 11 months ago
@smok3able u mad bro?
fenderkid6 11 months ago
@smok3able Lay of the weed man!!!
I think its fucked your retard head up!!!
funkyhomosapien1 11 months ago
Comment removed
Kivipallur92 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm selling my PC:
MB: Asus Rampage 3 Extreme
CPU: Intel Core i7 980x @4,6GHz
GPU: 3x GTX480 (Tri-SLI)
RAM: Corsair Dominator GT 2000MHz CL7
PSU: Silverstone Strider 1500W
SSD: 2x Crucial C300 256GB
HDD: WD Caviar Black 1TB
Case: Corsair Obsidian 800D
Send me a PM if you're interested!
Kivipallur92 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HI BIN
I DOWNLOADED DIRT 2 FROM RIPPBAY.COM FOR FREE >:D<
WORKS LIKE CHARM......AND THE GAME IS JUST SIMPLY AWESOME :-)
1986sumeet 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HI BIN
I DOWNLOADED DIRT 2 FROM RIPPBAY.COM FOR FREE >:D<
WORKS LIKE CHARM......AND THE GAME IS JUST SIMPLY AWESOME :-)
1986sumeet 1 year ago
Comment removed
1986sumeet 1 year ago
All that and no bezel correction...
HsCSpanky 1 year ago
You know you're an extreme gamer if you're wife abandon you
IronDonkeyProduction 1 year ago
hey BILLGATES THATS AWESOME
2012v 1 year ago
sry my bad english
marciolon 1 year ago
i dont get the point, to get 3 monitors and play with the 3rd person camera :S
marciolon 1 year ago 86
You should try standing the monitors up vertically...maybe looks better then stretched display
HazeTHC 1 year ago
@HazeTHC how bout not?
salviaaddict 1 year ago
3 tfts is cool but 1 and 3 make no sense in the game
trueNachtelfiro 1 year ago
whats that other window above your cpu meter? is that temp?
junco0 1 year ago
@junco0 frames per second
Playitdead090 1 year ago
dude ur rich
TheMiki8888 1 year ago
Hi. I just got my third 24" monitor and running the game at 6028*1080 but the cars and picture looks very stretched.What's wrong ?
Scortech 1 year ago
@Scortech make sure they didnt default to a lower resolution (like 1280x1024) and also, if its only the 2 outer monitors that are stretched, some games do that on purpose to get more of a peripheral vision type view
TitusRTeh1337Bassist 1 year ago
@TitusRTeh1337Bassist Thanks for the reply Titus. I managed to fix it in Dirt 2, I tried GTA 4 and that "peripheral vision type view" on the outer monitors is there, Very annoying. I guess there is no way to fix that,??
Scortech 1 year ago
@Scortech not as far as i know :\...BUT HEY! WHAT THE HELL. YOU HAVE 3 24" MONITORS SET UP FOR GAMING! HOW MANY PEOPLE DO YOU THINK CAN SAY THAT? :D stretched peripherals on some games > playing on one monitor ANY DAY
TitusRTeh1337Bassist 1 year ago
What kind of job Does this guy have? Does he run his own computer store or something?
jebus733 1 year ago
all you cunts are just jealous if you had this setup you would post videos with it surley. dont be hatin show some respect for fellow gamers?
natho369 1 year ago 82
@natho369 i for one honestly don't see the point of playing a game with those giant bezels separating the screens.
waseem1173 4 months ago
ur an asshole for posting this
Rosstacular 1 year ago
Did he really just turn the camera off a 3 monitor setup to another? WTF
Caigga900 1 year ago
nice beard ahah
kawasaki228 1 year ago
Comment removed
5468295 1 year ago
do you have a life?
fernandobo009 1 year ago
@fernandobo009 do u have the pc he has ? jelly little bit?
nycpd75 1 year ago 2
@fernandobo009 ohhhhh i dont know if you call having a life getting the things and excesses you want in this world and ' life' then i would say he does. if i were to call having a ' life' , hating on those that do have the things they want when i can't , then i would call you having a life, wouldn't I , you hating bitch
vanorge 1 year ago
@vanorge
hahaha im not hating im just asking and for your information i can get a pc like this if i want to.. i already have one all i need is 3 monitors dumb ass. seriously dont open your mouth if u dont know anything
fernandobo009 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
w w w.youtube.com/watch?v=MH2-3BanxY0
Dirt 2 pra quem quiser assistir .... xD
henriqueterminator 1 year ago
Hey.. DAAAAVEEEE!
747BEN747 1 year ago
I still love starwars podracer.
ImperialArmour 1 year ago
for me dx11 run better i got 60fps everything max with 1080p screen and loading are extremly fast (i got HD 6850)
000Nagby000 1 year ago
The only thing this shows me is that eyefinity is just a waste, look at the two other screens barely do you see any more than you really need to, you get small edges of the track, you want to play on a huge screen? Just get a regular 60 inch. Eyefinity really feels useless.
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz Rofl, there is a never ending stream of morons such as your self.
A 60 inch screen doesn't curve round, and it''s more expensive.
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125
I like that, you call me an idiot but your best defense is "Well it costs more and it doesn't curve" really? Does it matter? Two extra screens that barely provide anything that a sixty inch screen couldn't, is a waste of money. Eyefinity is useless.
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz It does cost more, and it doesn't curve.
Oh, could you not figure that one out :(
Obvious Nvidia fanboy is obvious.
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125
LMFAO Nvidia fanboy? Oh now i've been called it all. On the contrary, I'm not a fan of wasting money for useless features.
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz "DURP WAST OF MUNI"
Yes, you claiming this does mean it's a fact.
Evidence, Mr. Nvidia, we need evidence!
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 LMFAO What more evidence would you possibly need? It's all in the video, please show me where in this video were the two extra screens vital to playing the game? Unless you're using eyefinity for anything but playing straight video games it's useless. Also, by the way, I run an ati 5770 :O
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz Look at the immersion, you're obviously not a hardcore gamer, because you didn't even realise how immersive Eyefinity is.
For this reason, it's pretty obvious to see you ain't a gamer.
I take back the Nvidia fanboy, you obviously have an integrated graphics card XD
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 LMFAO Because I can see on the sides of me? That would make me a hardcore gamer because instead of looking forward at one monitor I now have three to look at, two of which really provides very little to no assistance in the game.
Yeah, no I'm just not stupid enough to think it's a reason to shell out six hundred more dollars for two matching monitors just so I can be "Immersed" with more screens to look at.
Yes, totally >.< That's why my 57770 is in my PCI-E slot!
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz Your eyes must be like your brain, narrow.
If you're rich, what is $600 more? Nothing.
And remember, 3 monitors = cheaper than 60 inch 1080p TV, so if you're going to start QQing about money, at least make sure you haven't fucked your argument from the start.
57770? Fail, you obviously Googled an ATI card, seen a 5770 but failed at realising there is only 2 7's.
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 And your hole must be like your boyfriends, wide.
I'm not rich, LMFAO where did I say I was rich?
55" full 1080p 120mhz HDTV 699, 200 dollars cheaper.
Or, I pressed the 7 one more time than I intended. Which makes me laugh pretty hard if you're desperate enough to use a typo as some sort of argument.
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz Aww, a little bit homophobic, your mother brought you up wrong.
I didn't say you were rich, I said if you ARE rich, why would you care, moron, l2r.
Make up a price of a TV, sweet, not even a brand, nice lying.
Typo? Yes, that's totally a typo, nice cover story.
You are jealous, other wise you wouldn't be going around going "WAST OF MUNI OMG".
Useless for gaming? Having a bigger FOV is useless? Nah, you gotta be trollin' me, that or I should feel sorry for you.
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 Not homophobic just telling the truth.
And i'm not rich, I'm sure most people watching this video aren't rich, so your point was moot either way L2Comprehend.
LOL Lying? It's a 55" Element, go look up your facts child.
Because a typo wouldn't explain why I typed 5770 the first time rofl, dumbass.
It is a waste of money and I said it once ;) thank you.
Actually a large FoV hinders your ability to play better due to a larger screen to keep track of.
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz Nice link there, kid.
Or, you're lying, and covering up for your jealousy ;)
Waste of money? Nah.
Hinders your ability? If you see something moving at the side of your screen, you turn around, who said you have to stare at the side, if you see something move, you can react faster, you're clearly trying very hard to find reasons it's not good for gaming, but the fact is, it is.
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 Find it yourself, you want it? Go look for it.
Oh totally :)
In your opinion.
So you mean to tell me keeping track of three different monitors while you sit what, maybe ten inches away is easier than keeping track of what's going on in one screen? Yeah sorry don't think so, smaller screen = less to keep track of = faster, easier, and better. Large/Multiple screens = More to keep track of = Slower, harder, and average.
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz Aww, you're not giving a link because you lied :(
In my opinion? Nope.
As I've said, you don't keep track of all 3, if you see something move at the side (Such as my fingers in my mirror) you react to it, you do realise that's what humans do, yes?
Bigger FOV = Able to react faster, no slowdown (Unless your Username beings with 808 XD), pro.
Smaller = More likely to be killed from the side, no slowdown, average.
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 I gave you all the information for you to google it and find out for yourself :) if you choose not to go look, that's your prerogative.
:) Yes in your opinion.
And then it turns out to be nothing you face back in front of you and you're dead because that little thing that moved on the side of you that you weren't keeping track of was a speck of the environment lol.
:) Then it just so happens that competitive gamers use smaller TV's for no reason?
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz Non existent TV is non existent.
Nothing? What a pathetic counter argument, why would you turn around if you seen nothing? Ah, right, you wouldn't, you're just desperate now.
Competitive gamers usually use very big expensive TV's.
And standard competitions don't allow the use of 3 monitors, that's why.
Again, please THINK.
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 Only when stupid people who demand things don't go get them :)
Please read the statement, you react to things you may see in the corner of your eye, you turn that way and it happens to be nothing, oh look there's a guy aiming at you now from the way you "were" facing you turn back, oops you're dead. ;) Nope all of your points are moot no need for desperation :).
And actually they use smaller TV's for faster reaction time :)
Yes, please, think.
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz You had the link, you didn't give me it, you didn't have a reason to not supply the link when I asked you for it, apart from the fact that you're lying.
To be nothing? How can I react to something which is not there?
Also, if I DID turn over there (Which I wouldn't you don't usually react to NOTHING) I would still be able to see the person in at the side, so I'd turn back.
You can get big TV's with fast responses, they're expensive, and they usually use them.
Think, nao!
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 I didn't have the link, I googled a TV, found one and listed enough for you to do your own research. If you think i'm lying, lol that's fine, that's your opinion, but if you're going to bitch and whine about the subject don't bring it up?
Boy, with all this intelligence bashing, and you can't comprehend that, nothing as in, you're not going to shoot it and get a kill, nothing. Which you wouldn't have to do with ONE monitor.
Not the TV's reaction time, the persons. LOL you're mental.
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz Still bringing up the TV? Tell you what, I'll be the one with the brains and ignore that top part, seeing as after multiple times in asking you, you still go on about it.
That second sentence made no sense.
Yea, I guess I didn't understand that one right (Notice how I admit it, unlike your self).
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125
Again because you lack the comprehension skills to be able to understand what the fuck everyone is saying.
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz Oh look, off topic, try prove me wrong more instead of throwing random insults, it'll help you, I swear!
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 LOL Actually, had you followed what that comment was responding to, it would have been strangely on-topic. You said you didn't understand and I told you why :) see? On topic.
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz More off topic, try prove me wrong, oh wait, that's why you're changing the subject, because you can't!
harrier125 1 year ago
@808Productionz Rofl that guy pwned you
How could having 3 monitors not be better
What a idiot you are
You even stopped replying to him instead of manning up and admitting your wrong
TheSeventiethSeven 1 year ago
@808Productionz PS. It's also pretty obvious that you're jealous of Maxishine's set up, you seem to go pretty far to make it look like you aren't.
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 Notice though, how I didn't say anything about his set up, and yet you say I'm jealous? LOL His set up is pretty badass. Eyefinity is useless for gaming, which is what I said, which was my point, which you're to stupid to actually get. Though, it's hilarious, you haven't mentioned one thing that games benefit from eyefinity except "Immersion" which games have been doing with one monitor pretty fine for years now.
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz Okay, so your point is it's not fit for gaming. Why would having a bigger FOV, being able to see your opponents without having to turn to face them be bad for gaming?
Ah, right, it isn't.
PS. That's greater immersion, notice how 3D is coming along, that offers better immersion too, yet I don't see you QQing about 3D.
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 A bigger field of view = More area to keep track of, unless your eyes come out of your socket when you play or you sit a food five to six feet away from your three monitors it's useless.
PS: I wouldn't sit in front of a TV for anything but a movie wearing glasses looking like a dumbass, if that's what you enjoy doing because you feel it "Immerses" you that's your prerogative, it's useless for gaming.
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz And, again, please at least provide a small amount of evidence that it's useless for gaming, all you've said so far is "2 much 2 kep trak of!", I've proved that wrong, bring on some more.
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 LMFAO Where have you proved that, besides through speculation with your fucked up logic?
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz Try reading it again if you had difficulty the first time XD
harrier125 1 year ago
@808Productionz Also, just so you know, right now I'm looking at my screen, and I can see my self typing in the mirrow, despite it being at the side of my eyes (Farther round that these monitors curve) so that's proof that these do work.
If your eyes are fucked, then I suppose this isn't any good for you.
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 In the mirrow, really? Never heard of those, anyways. Note that I said "GAMES" not "INTERNET BROWSING" I never said that they didn't work, I even said they work better for graphics design and businesses. They're about as useless for gaming as 3D is.
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz But they're not, I've proved that, as I've said, I'm looking at my monitor right now, and even though I am touch typing and watching the screen, I can still at the side of my eyes see my fingers moving, I'm not even concentrating on the mirror, I just see it.
And Maxishine's video of him doing that too is proof.
It appears you're unwilling to admit that you're incorrect, which I find childish.
harrier125 1 year ago
@808Productionz Ah, and RTS, being able to see more units on screen at once (Would work terrifically for SupCom).
Third person shooters benefit from being able to see enemies at a wider angle.
FPS is the same as Third Person's.
Simulation games would benefit from this, being able to see the whole of a planes cockpit, like real life.
Your argument was that for gaming, it was useless, I just proved you wrong.
Bring me my gold medal!
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125
RTS? Nothing a larger screen couldn't do, hell even a projector, there's your big ass screen for you 300 bucks six hundred cheaper.
TPS and FPS same as I said before, more to keep track of = Hinders ability. And again Projecter big ass screen.
I said besides Sim games if you're going to argue a point, please pay attention.
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz Not everyone has space for a projector, son.
Doesn't hinder ability, I've all ready proved that.
Beside sim games? But there games, and you said it's useless for gaming, it would appear you're trying to narrow my ground to argue on, ain't gonna happen, son ;)
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 No but you have space for three big ass monitors? Right.
You did? Where?
Sim games aren't average run of the mill games, you don't pick up and play sim games like you would crysis, or Dirt, which is what I also said later in that comment I quoted.
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz I do, I'd just have to move my shelf a bit, that's all.
I picked up and played LockOn, so, yes, Sim games do count.
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 Then I'm sure you have enough space for a projector :)
Yeah? Bill gates made a fortune, so that must mean everyone can do the same exact thing and get the same exact outcome. Sorry, doesn't work that way, normal people don't pick up and play Sims.
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz For a projector I'd need to clear a whole wall and a space for the projector. Remember when I asked you to think? I wasn't being sarcastic...
I'm a normal person, I went and picked up a sim, I've played LockOn, RailWorks 2 and Farm Simulator, I have no interest in Trains or Farms, yet I've played them both.
And I know many others who have done the same.
Your arguments are becoming so petty, simply stating that no one does that isn't evidence.
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 And I'm assuming your desk space is so close to the ceiling that the only thing that can fit inbetween that space is three monitors? "Really?"
Awesome? But that wasn't the point, people don't pick up Sim games to hardcore game on them, you don't pick up Falcon 5.0 because you're going to hardcore game on it, you don't pick up Flight Simulator X because you're going to hardcore game on it. Simulation games aren't run of the mill games, sorry.
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz If I'm sitting infront of the wall, how on earth can a projector project through me? My PC is right at the wall.
I played LockOn A LOT, and there are many groups and clans which DO hardcore game on sims, I played Flashpoint for a long time and so many people still do.
They are, and I've proved that, I hardcore gamed on LockOn and Flashpoint + ArmA.
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 Here's something "Truely" amazing, did you know you can "move" shit :O Another feat of rocket science for you.
Flashpoint is a Shooter, sorry.
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz Flashpoint is a sim, it's always been known as a simulator, it was MARKETED as a war simulator.
Seems you're still lacking in the thinking department.
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 Hm "Operation Flashpoint is a first person tactical military video game series for the PC, Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3. It consists of three titles. As of October 2010[update], only the first two have been released." :O I guess CoD and BF are both Sims to.
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz I was talking about the original flashpoint, moron, that's why I said "People still play it" as in it's been out for a long time and it's still popular.
Jesus Christ, I have no hope for you, kid.
harrier125 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@harrier125 LMFAO Again "Operation Flashpoint is a first person tactical military video game series for the PC, Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3. It consists of three titles. As of October 2010[update], only the first two have been released." I'm guessing CoD and BF can count as Sims to no? :O
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz Operation Flashpoint, the original, isn't available on the new Consoles, a shame, great game indeed.
And it is a simulator, no matter how much you cry that it's not, it was developed as a simulator, advertised as a simulator, is hailed as a simulator.
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 It's a shame you missed the "Series" part of that sentence.
It's not, if it were a simulator, like all the other simulator games it would have been "First person tactical military simulator" as you said, yet it's not. I didn't make up the rules :) i just beat you with them.
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz The first one was made by different people, the second one was taken over by other people who did not work on the first.
Just because the second one isn't tactical doesn't mean the first isn't, you're clearly desperate, trying to say something can't be a simulation if it's sequel isn't a simulation too.
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 Again HUGE important word was "Series" it wasn't describing the genre of one game but all of them, l2r.
I didn't say it wasn't a simulation the description of the series genre said it wasn't a simulation game, and if it doesn't say it's a simulation game, it must not be a simulation game. :O
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz It is a simulation game, I've played it, you haven't, my father bought it for me the week it came out, yours didn't.
I played it for years, one or two bullets killed you, you had to use your map to navigate, no waypoints, no nothing, you could turn them on, but it's a simulation, you don't usually do that :)
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 Sure in your opinion maybe, but the quote didn't say simulation did it?
Awesome? Sounds like Ghost Recon to me :) I guess GR is a Simulation to, oh and CoD since one or two bullets killed you and there really are no real way points. Oh maybe BF2 to hmmm.
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz Quote? There are many quotes, not just one, son.
And, obviously you're now picking out anything similar, which is pathetic.
Do you have to use a map to navigate in BF2, GR or CoD? Nope.
Do you die in a 1 hit even if it strikes your chest? Nope.
Does it simulate a real life battlefield with realistic written all over it? Nope.
I guess it is a simulator.
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125
Yes you can in BF, GR, and CoD games.
Depends on the gun :)
In my opinion, probably.
So I don't see the difference.
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz You were proved wrong, and I was right, you still argue that it's not a simulator despite multiple sources of professional game reviewers and multiple opinions and the actual creators saying it is XD
Also, yes, in those games a Sniper kills in one shot, but a pistol doesn't, a rifle doesn't.
And, there you go, depends on the gun, in flashpoint, 1 pistol bullet spells the end for you.
harrier125 1 year ago
@808Productionz "Operation Flashpoint: Cold War Crisis, sometimes shortened to Operation Flashpoint, and abbreviated OFP, is a tactical shooter and battlefield simulator video game"
Aww, I guess you WERE wrong :(
Just like everything else, I guess XD
Rofl, now you're going to tell me Wikipedia and other sources I checked are all wrong just because you're too childish to admit that you were wrong, which, by the way, is pathetic, truly.
harrier125 1 year ago
@808Productionz Oh, and just another thing to possibly make you realise how wrong you are, if a bigger FOV is distracting, why do competitive players in competitions turn the FOV to the max allowed?
I guess because they realise that they only need to see something at the side, not focus on it.
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 Notice how they're playing on smaller monitors, and they're not each playing on three monitors at the same time, the more you can see in ONE monitor the better, why? Because it's easier to FOCUS on ONE monitor than semi-focus on one and glance over at two others.
:) And another one of your arguments bites the dust /win
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz They play on small monitors because, as I've all ready told you, they aren't allowed to play on huge ones, they are given a setup, they don't bring there own, the only thing they can do is change the graphical settings, and, well, well, well, they seem to put the FOV to the highest!
Another argument bites the dust? Obviously you're getting quite anxious at how ownage I am.
harrier125 1 year ago
@harrier125 Again, it's set high because it's easier to focus on one monitor rather than three. I'm sure they've been doing this a lot longer than eyefinity has been around. Hell it's what? Barely a year old? The more you can see on one monitor the better, the larger your monitor, the more there is to look at, the more time you spend glancing around the longer your reaction to things you aren't immediately looking at.
Lol You only wish you were nearly as good as I am :)
808Productionz 1 year ago
@808Productionz Funny, you say they prefer one monitor when they do better on 3 XD
You still don't understand the basic human eye, how pathetic can you get.
If you look at one monitor and focus on it, you are using all your attention on that monitor, and, guess what, the human eye (Those things in your eye sockets!) can still see things move at the side of your other monito