Fascinating ! :) "So tweeted a tech from twitter" hahhahaa Lol ! Love this new age talk.lol :) Doesn't even seem out of place anymore. :) As fascinating as it was, absolutely loved the informative video through & through ! Especially the way the laws of physics is explained from 1:21, with awesome graphics ! :)
Thanks, love checking back your videos every so often. Always something new to learn, in a fun n fascinating format.:)
Regards & Best Always, Ritu. (SF Bay Area, California)
@MaulqasmPK I shouldn't have said they're all dumb, only the ones that choose to be blind or manipulative. BTW true Buddhist believe in the mystic law of cause and effect, expiation of karma through chanting nam-myoho-renge-kyo; there's nothing about accepting other peoples ridiculous comments, or accepting religious views that are historically and presently causes for much suffering in the world.
@MaulqasmPK lol what, are you 12? Think you forgot some more "ha". I did remove it, even though I didn't curse, it was blanket comment I made out of frustration. Honestly, I didn't want to sound crass, or sound like someone like you, who seems about as sharp as a bowl of jello.
@Jogyobosatsu Okay enlightened one. It's so funny how you consider yourself some open minded Buddhist who is so above everyone else. Then you say crass in an attempt to sound smarter then, but in turn you throw insults at me.
@93Dr0 just trying to show we can go back and forth forever, the fact is no one really knows what started this universe or our very existince. you can say a random explosion did, or a force we cannot understand and simply labeled it "god". athiest and religious arguments are pointless.
@toulouse666 Hydroelectric is safe, but nuclear is a very volatile and dangerous form to work with. Green technology is far advancing past what our traditional resources can do. You don't have a clue as to what you are talking about.
Well, this is dumb. My Science teacher taught me that man came from monkey due to evolution, then later at lunch she tells me God created man as a human from the beginning. Stupid teachers...
If only to put Hydroelectric and Nuclear energy production in the proper positive perspective they so richly deserve as compared to utterly insignificant so called "green" mentally defectively retarded alternatives, thank you! ;)
"...shrinks down to the very center where it gets destroyed. In a singularity, a region of infinite warped space in time. And it is gone."
I find this pretty confusing, if all singularities are a region of infinite warped space and time then wouldn't all of them have the same sized event horizons?
How is this against any religion at all? I'm a Christian and I love this stuff. I see it as evidence of God and anyone else can see it however they like. I don't see any reason to argue.
You have to understand that non-religious people are wondering why you can mix God and religion with Nature. I know, it's in the Bible, God created everything, but nobody has any evidence about that godly creation process. Hence, you seem like sitting on a fence, not wanting to loose anything : nor Nature/Science, nor God. You are right, it's your choice, not ours. But still, how Nature is an evidence of anything except itself? Why put God everywhere?
@HalfFullYeah I see where you are coming from. The universe is so vastly large and I can see how nature could create all these incredible things just by being nature. But, to me, I see all these things like the big bang and evolution as evidence of existence of a God. I put God everywhere because I see God everywhere, I just can't see it any other way. We both look at the same thing and explain it differently.
@JokingChief "We both look at the same thing and explain it differently." - You haven't explained anything at all. All you have said is majic man done it. That is not an explanation. All you have done is demonstrated your own lack of understanding as to what an explanation truly is. Ie, I don't know what an explanation truly means so i'm gonna say god dunnit to what i think explanation means.
@JokingChief not the christian god (or any other major gods) that had implied the universe is <10thousand years old. come on now i thought discoveries like this one (which you love) will make us be more honest to ourselves...
@rtandias I don't know where in the bible it says the universe is 10,000 years old. The 6 days it took God to create the earth weren't 6 24-hour time periods if you look at the hebrew translation.
@JokingChief "I see it as evidence of God and anyone else can see it however they like. I don't see any reason to argue." - I do. from my view, not challenging stupid, ill formed beliefs allows them to flourish, without adequate reasoning at all. I see religious nonsense being challenged wherever it pops it's head up as a good thing, a healthy response to nonsense. For those that think this is against god, too bad. For those that don't and are believers, you really aren't that much better.
@TheSpankymonkey I don't see how my "stupid, ill-informed" beliefs that I give reason to from personal experience and examples I see in the world in any way give you a reason to argue. If you have a lack of belief in God or another deity I don't see why what I belief matters to you at all.
@JokingChief "I don't see why what I belief matters to you at all." - Of course you don't. Which is probably why you believe in such nonsense to begin with. If we all chose to explain away our own ignorance with skydaddy where would we be.... Oh wait... we already know the answer to that one don't we.
@TheSpankymonkey Where would we be? We would create one of the prime examples of a democracy that many countries base their government off of. And I don't believe in God to explain the inevitable, I believe in him because he loves me and has saved me. It baffles me why many atheists have a problem with that because it doesn't force anything on them or attack their beliefs in any way because they have no beliefs.
@JokingChief "It baffles me why many atheists have a problem with that" - Like i said before, of course it baffles you. Of course you don't see how, of course you just don't get it. Once you have resigned yourself to talking donkeys, snakes and walking zombies you are hardly going to be in the best of positions to understand reality are you?
@JokingChief From experience (not saying you're like this) but many that do believe in god try to force their beliefs on others; banning evolution, banning sex education, voting against gay marriage, etc, etc. I don't care what you believe as long as you don't try to force your beliefs on others.
I'll never understand why so many Americans still believe the world was created in 7 days (in Europe religion is close to none existant). They denie the findings of modern science, yet they make use of it every day (the internet, computers, medical care,cars, planes and so on...)
@Paiste01 You can't say that religion in Europe is close to non-existent. I've seen the faithful line up at a French abbey to buy blue toilet-bowl cleaner made by monks. What about Fatima, and Lourdes, and St. James of Compostela?
And religious-based hatred is alive and well in Europe - many people hate other religions and races just as much as their medieval great-great-great-great-great-grandfathers did.
@tonyblackops ppl cant keep there mouths shut, im catholic but i open my ideals to everything, i dont understand why ppl cant put religion with science
"i dont understand why ppl cant put religion with science"
Religion is the very antithesis of science. Whereas science always continues to ask questions, religion encourages you to be satisfied with the answers in a given dogma. Whereas science demands rigorous standards of evidence, religion encourages faith. The two are fundamentally incompatible.
@tonyblackops Yes. You watch the video, then move on with your self-satisfied self. The ONLY WAY you can become upset or disturbed at all by the comments, is if you purposely scroll down to view them. Don't. Your problem, and 20 others as well, is now solved. Do not scroll down, view no religious debates. You're welcome. ; )
@tonyblackops it's because youtube is on the front lines of the religion vs. reason discourse, so any video to do with either subject will spawn a certain amount of debate. don't hate on this phenomenon, it's basically free speech at its purest. the trolls and douches are just a small price for this freedom, it's worth putting up with them when you consider the alternatives.
@tonyblackops Yes. It's annoying. But it is also exhilarating. The social taboo against calling out the religious nuts' irrational beliefs in public has finally been overturned. (Thanks, Richard.) We still have a ways to go. But the ignorant in our society are now on the run. Finally, they have to defend their irrational beliefs with facts. And they have to come to terms with the fact that their mothers and reverends, as they were growing up and soaking it all in, were full of shit.
@VCanucks93: Solar electric sattelites and microwave energy transfer can supply about 10TW if we do it right. Nuclear could, too, if they'd stop being so PC and playing games of NIMBY and worked on real reactor technology instead of the practically Steam Punk ancient garbage we have now. Travelling Wave Reactors can sonsume "waste" as well as "spent" fuel quite nicely, for instance. Pebble Bed reactors are immune to "meltdown". Waste concentration works. Only politics is in the way.
@RyuDarragh Well, nuclear energy is still tricky (though safer than many would like to admit).
Specifically, pebble bed reactor fuel can't be reprocessed, traveling wave reactors have never been built, and breeder reactors have too low of a net energy output to be commercially viable.
Not to say that we shouldn't mature the technology. But on the other side of the fence, politics are a credit to the fact we have any nuclear energy at all; power companies aren't willing to invest in it.
@SevenSixTwoNato: Tricky, indeed. But, solutions exist for all of it except the politics :P The pebbles of one design are screwed together and are meant to be reprocessed every 25 Years. Breeders produce net energy by converting normally useless Uranium into usable forms. Most of the trickiness and most of the reluctance is the ham handed regulations that reflect mostly political and non-science based thinking. The reluctance to use a breeder stems mostly from the creation of Pu.
@Shanjaq: The conservation of energy simply means that no matter how inneficient a system may be, in a given volume of space, no energy is lost. If you added up all the work in an event plus all the waste heat and anything lost in subatomic energy transfers, etc, the value would be precisely the same as at the start of the event. Note: It will also never be greater, either.
Tsar bomba, the most powerful nuclear weapon tested, generated about 5.4 septillion watts in 39 nanoseconds. The Saturn 5 rocket doesn't even compare. =P
...a super nova created us along with the sun and stars near it , the planet
~having blown its outer body off to do this creating, leaving only as small black hole at its core to one day devour all that it created , as singularitys do until they are again able to explode.
i have a question, please answer if you can. When matter enters a black hole (such as light, planets, or even entire galaxies) what happens to it? Just curious
@ShadowiGeneral I asked this question of the well-known black hole expert, Kip Thorne, a few years ago. He described matter collapsing into a black hole: "... the matter continues to shrink smaller and smaller and smaller, goes inside the horizon inside the surface of the black hole, shrinks down to the very center where it gets destroyed. In a singularity, a region of infinite warped space in time. And it is gone."
It's converted, he said, to the energy of warped space and time.
@SpaceRip What if a Black Hole it is a physical object, and not actually a hole? And because of it owns gravity absorves everything, increasing its matter and size?
@minimonster007 Again, because of its own gravity, light cannot scape from them... The images we see are actually a light reflect from them, so if light cannot scape from this "black hole" we're not able to see it...
@SpaceRip Great Video!, but I saw this post and am a little confused: can the current physics models answer that question? Doesn't discontinuity between general relativity and quantum mechanics prevent any accurate prediction of the state of super-condensed matter?
@SpaceRip There's another theory(actually MANY...) that everything that gets sucked into a black hole, and crushed into a "singularity"(which is a fancy way of saying that the laws of physics as we know it breaks down and we have no explanation) bursts out the "other side" creating another "big bang", creating a completely new universe. Remember, if you subscribe to the big bang theory, it started with a singularity. Think about it, it's a fascinating theory, and actually makes sense.
@SpaceRip Stephen Hawkings work demonstrated that black holes 'arent so black' and emit radiation jets of gamma rays. Apparently this has been scientifically observed but who really knows for sure.. but these jets of radiation could account for where some or even all of that energy goes. A: it comes back into the universe slowly leached back in the form of high energy radiation
@ShadowiGeneral Nothing it just goes on and on... Mybe it does come to a end but we do not know, also if it came to a end! Another part of the universe the planet's and Galaxies may not have much energy, because of it being drained in the force of the black hole whitch the black hole uses to grow bigger and stronger!
@dudecomestocum: (2/2) Gravity goes to zero at the very center as it does in any spherical body, but density does not. It's at this point that the space/time ripple that makes up all particles goes to values we have no good math for. What this does to the very notion of subatomic particles is only a guess, but the suspicion is that the very nature of space/time at the singularity changes and conditions like those at the big bang exist. It is the blackest place possible as even photons vanish.
@ShadowiGeneral: The best explanation is that it is mostly turned into neutronium somewhere inside the event horizon and followed further in by other "degenerate" states of matter until you get to the "singularity" where things get wierd indeed. Light further out becomes electrons (just as electrons/positrons become gamma rays) and those in turn join the protons and become neutrons, then degenerate matter (sometimes called a quark soup). (1/2)
@CurtHowland Governments have to get space exploration started; once we start getting valuble resources from asteroids, the moon and mars(and eventually venus), and there's financial incentive, then the corporations can take over, but right now, it's moving stagnantly slow. Obama can't find money for the constellation program, but he can hundreds of millions of dollars worth of missiles to send to other countries ON THE FIRST DAY.
@PaleBlueVoice Govts were able to spend the extraordinary quantity of treasure needed when such efforts were inefficient. Technology has improved, and now it's nearly "efficient" to get out of the gravity well.
As such, private space efforts are spreading and the profitable, that is 'efficient'', use of space can begin.
I agree that govt is inefficient. the Apollo program was mostly to prove to the Russians that the US could put any bomb, no matter how big, anywhere on the planet.
Corporations will never be able to serve the role of NASA, ESO, and similar.
What is the incentive to sink ten billion dollars into a new space telescope, or a similar amount into a space probe?
No, corporations will take actions that benefit their bottom line - mining, tourism, military...and if the airlines are any indication, the order of priorities will be profit, profit, profit, profit, maybe PR, profit, maybe safety, profit, profit, sustainability, profit, profit.
The only reason those projects cost so much is that the taxpayer provides a blank check, while the politicians use that bottomless well of money to pay off their campaign contributors.
You want it, I want it, so do many other people. So you, and I, and many other people, contribute to the project to build/launch it. Private satellites, private launch facilities and systems, already exist.
So do non-profit organizations of interested individuals. Just do it.
"Private satellites, private launch facilities and systems, already exist."
Yes, and what are those used for? Proprietary technology. Do you see Motorola launching satellites to study comets? No, you see them enhancing their network. Which you of course must pay to use.
See a pattern?
Not to mention, once larger manned craft are privatized, corporations will cut corners like they do everywhere else. Except when the hull of a spacecraft rips open due to cheap parts...fill in the rest.
"Except when the hull of a spacecraft rips open due to cheap parts...fill in the rest."
You obviously have no idea how liability insurance works.
A govt craft blows up killing all on board...nothing. A private craft will have to satisfy both their customers, and their insurance company's safety requirements.
Everyone, if u like space vids then go onto " Vsauce" and go on their leanback playlist its really good and its about space,it will really make you go WOW, and maybe be a bit scared. Its rly good
It's not how much energy do we need, it's how to get more than we need. I don't like it when people start talking about energy as a collective bargaining. Too much of a communism for me. New World Order coming through the use of energy.
@summergreen500 first of all you used irrelevant wrong, second of all the tweet part was to get viewers interested to something they can actually relate to...
Science doesn't care about religion. Science only cares about science. However, if science were a religion, I would join! Awesome video. Thanks SpaceRip, keep 'em coming!!!
@ReligousTruth If science was a religion, every person who already had a religion would be dead, seeing as they cannot follow other religions, and medicine is science... maybe we can erase religion by making science a religion...
@soulsistah102: No. Religion is dogmatic and cannot admit error. It does not self correct or test. Remember the definition of "Faith" as "Belief without evidence or proof." That is antithetical to science.
@RyuDarragh Well.. I guess you're right.. I just wish that religion wasn't here. I mean, it's kind of stupid. Trying to persuade people in fairy tales. Can't we come up with a scientific way instead of believing in a big man in the sky with a beard?
@soulsistah102: We do have a way. It requires no belief without evidence. No supernatural anything. Humanism has been demoised by the religious because it advocates proper ways of behaving based on the welfare of all humans and all life on the planet, but without their "God". It recognizes that humans are fallible, but can always do better. One is expected to grow up and mature, becomming a rational being. Religion tends towards infantilizing its followers and that provides an excuse for "Evil".
This's so great to consider for common people like myself :) Remarkable components of the universe being associated with very tangible ideas... love it, thanks for posting
@YourBrainOnReligion because you name Universe everything that exist and that means that the Universe is a close system closed by the "nothingness" and if you believe in a Multiverse the same principal applies to it
(I have explained the best that I could related to my English skills)
@dexro2005 Ahh okay, the possibility of a multiverse is precisely why I was asking. Seems to me that a multiverse scenario wouldn't necessarily mean they're entirely closed from one another. But I guess that's more philosophy than scientific speculation as it's still in the realm of the untestable. Thanks for your reply.
you have some great stuff here
thegeffc 3 weeks ago
good work here
xtremetom180 3 weeks ago
some great inforamtion here thanks
osclarkos 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i enjoyed this vid
shellybirdy 1 month ago
This is a great video
jayejayeee 1 month ago
brilliant video
sprattysy 1 month ago
green homes
hamid4222 1 month ago
u could have just showed an apple falling down rather than that glass ;p
Mr007eds 2 months ago
First town that's baltimore
24hackersX 2 months ago
2:40 O.o
RyfoMicol 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Fascinating ! :) "So tweeted a tech from twitter" hahhahaa Lol ! Love this new age talk.lol :) Doesn't even seem out of place anymore. :) As fascinating as it was, absolutely loved the informative video through & through ! Especially the way the laws of physics is explained from 1:21, with awesome graphics ! :)
Thanks, love checking back your videos every so often. Always something new to learn, in a fun n fascinating format.:)
Regards & Best Always, Ritu. (SF Bay Area, California)
3rd Dec11'
ritupm 2 months ago in playlist Violent Universe
Comment removed
Jogyobosatsu 8 months ago
@Jogyobosatsu You are obviously not a true Buddhist. A true Buddhist would accept other peoples' religions.
MaulqasmPK 6 months ago
@MaulqasmPK I shouldn't have said they're all dumb, only the ones that choose to be blind or manipulative. BTW true Buddhist believe in the mystic law of cause and effect, expiation of karma through chanting nam-myoho-renge-kyo; there's nothing about accepting other peoples ridiculous comments, or accepting religious views that are historically and presently causes for much suffering in the world.
Jogyobosatsu 6 months ago
@Jogyobosatsu hahahahaha. You removed your comment. Now your a fake Buddhist, and a bitch.
MaulqasmPK 6 months ago
@MaulqasmPK lol what, are you 12? Think you forgot some more "ha". I did remove it, even though I didn't curse, it was blanket comment I made out of frustration. Honestly, I didn't want to sound crass, or sound like someone like you, who seems about as sharp as a bowl of jello.
Jogyobosatsu 6 months ago
@Jogyobosatsu Okay enlightened one. It's so funny how you consider yourself some open minded Buddhist who is so above everyone else. Then you say crass in an attempt to sound smarter then, but in turn you throw insults at me.
MaulqasmPK 6 months ago
GOD CREATED THE UNIVERSE.
nukeusa911x2 8 months ago
@nukeusa911x2 there never was any god of any kind
OutstandingJourney 8 months ago
@OutstandingJourney where you there in the begining of the universe? no? well then be quiet.
nukeusa911x2 8 months ago
Comment removed
93Dr0 8 months ago
@93Dr0 my faith tells me god did this.
nukeusa911x2 8 months ago
@nukeusa911x2 Oh, well then in that case, my common sense tells me that god didnt.
93Dr0 8 months ago
@93Dr0 just trying to show we can go back and forth forever, the fact is no one really knows what started this universe or our very existince. you can say a random explosion did, or a force we cannot understand and simply labeled it "god". athiest and religious arguments are pointless.
nukeusa911x2 8 months ago
@nukeusa911x2 Alright, then next time say that.
93Dr0 8 months ago
@93Dr0 lol
nukeusa911x2 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nukeusa911x2 Where were you? You weren't there either, so you have no room to talk. Be quiet.
93Dr0 8 months ago
*form of energy
happynumnum 8 months ago
@toulouse666 Hydroelectric is safe, but nuclear is a very volatile and dangerous form to work with. Green technology is far advancing past what our traditional resources can do. You don't have a clue as to what you are talking about.
happynumnum 8 months ago
Well, this is dumb. My Science teacher taught me that man came from monkey due to evolution, then later at lunch she tells me God created man as a human from the beginning. Stupid teachers...
sniperfury1 8 months ago
i think i have seen this video a year ago.
TENJHOTENGE1 9 months ago
Thats some serious mind fuck there.
CrayonVlogger 9 months ago 3
Is there such thing as a Religious Scientist ?
phanable1 9 months ago
@phanable1 Gregor Mendel, an Augustinian monk, is known as the father of genetic studies.
joudheus 9 months ago
@phanable1 i think the call them scientologists and no one thinks very much of them...
TheSuperintendant 8 months ago
1:04 - 1:07 what a waste of a glass!
puma1029384756 10 months ago
Awesome.
If only to put Hydroelectric and Nuclear energy production in the proper positive perspective they so richly deserve as compared to utterly insignificant so called "green" mentally defectively retarded alternatives, thank you! ;)
toulouse666 10 months ago
i wonder if they were paid to mention twitter.
Evilfisher 10 months ago
@keedin , thanks!
FindingVickie 10 months ago
This guy's running from the cops. You can tell by the red and blue lights. 2:39
Gengar10000000000 10 months ago
Nothing in the universe is more powerful than Dick Rodstein's voice.
culwin 10 months ago
"...shrinks down to the very center where it gets destroyed. In a singularity, a region of infinite warped space in time. And it is gone."
I find this pretty confusing, if all singularities are a region of infinite warped space and time then wouldn't all of them have the same sized event horizons?
TehOwnerer999 10 months ago
mind-boggling.
stepherdavis 10 months ago
i love spacerip how do they churn out these videos so regulary awesme:D
MrHumbugz 10 months ago
NEGATIVE
froatufo 10 months ago
atheism = win
ADVladimir 10 months ago
How is this against any religion at all? I'm a Christian and I love this stuff. I see it as evidence of God and anyone else can see it however they like. I don't see any reason to argue.
JokingChief 10 months ago 3
@JokingChief
I agree with everything you just said.
marcdaddy33 10 months ago
Dear @JokingChief
You have to understand that non-religious people are wondering why you can mix God and religion with Nature. I know, it's in the Bible, God created everything, but nobody has any evidence about that godly creation process. Hence, you seem like sitting on a fence, not wanting to loose anything : nor Nature/Science, nor God. You are right, it's your choice, not ours. But still, how Nature is an evidence of anything except itself? Why put God everywhere?
Cheers!
HalfFullYeah 10 months ago
@HalfFullYeah I see where you are coming from. The universe is so vastly large and I can see how nature could create all these incredible things just by being nature. But, to me, I see all these things like the big bang and evolution as evidence of existence of a God. I put God everywhere because I see God everywhere, I just can't see it any other way. We both look at the same thing and explain it differently.
Thanks for your input and response!
JokingChief 10 months ago
@JokingChief "We both look at the same thing and explain it differently." - You haven't explained anything at all. All you have said is majic man done it. That is not an explanation. All you have done is demonstrated your own lack of understanding as to what an explanation truly is. Ie, I don't know what an explanation truly means so i'm gonna say god dunnit to what i think explanation means.
TheSpankymonkey 10 months ago
@JokingChief not the christian god (or any other major gods) that had implied the universe is <10thousand years old. come on now i thought discoveries like this one (which you love) will make us be more honest to ourselves...
rtandias 10 months ago
@rtandias I don't know where in the bible it says the universe is 10,000 years old. The 6 days it took God to create the earth weren't 6 24-hour time periods if you look at the hebrew translation.
JokingChief 10 months ago
@JokingChief "I see it as evidence of God and anyone else can see it however they like. I don't see any reason to argue." - I do. from my view, not challenging stupid, ill formed beliefs allows them to flourish, without adequate reasoning at all. I see religious nonsense being challenged wherever it pops it's head up as a good thing, a healthy response to nonsense. For those that think this is against god, too bad. For those that don't and are believers, you really aren't that much better.
TheSpankymonkey 10 months ago
@TheSpankymonkey I don't see how my "stupid, ill-informed" beliefs that I give reason to from personal experience and examples I see in the world in any way give you a reason to argue. If you have a lack of belief in God or another deity I don't see why what I belief matters to you at all.
JokingChief 10 months ago
@JokingChief "I don't see why what I belief matters to you at all." - Of course you don't. Which is probably why you believe in such nonsense to begin with. If we all chose to explain away our own ignorance with skydaddy where would we be.... Oh wait... we already know the answer to that one don't we.
TheSpankymonkey 10 months ago
@TheSpankymonkey Where would we be? We would create one of the prime examples of a democracy that many countries base their government off of. And I don't believe in God to explain the inevitable, I believe in him because he loves me and has saved me. It baffles me why many atheists have a problem with that because it doesn't force anything on them or attack their beliefs in any way because they have no beliefs.
JokingChief 10 months ago
@JokingChief "It baffles me why many atheists have a problem with that" - Like i said before, of course it baffles you. Of course you don't see how, of course you just don't get it. Once you have resigned yourself to talking donkeys, snakes and walking zombies you are hardly going to be in the best of positions to understand reality are you?
TheSpankymonkey 10 months ago
@JokingChief From experience (not saying you're like this) but many that do believe in god try to force their beliefs on others; banning evolution, banning sex education, voting against gay marriage, etc, etc. I don't care what you believe as long as you don't try to force your beliefs on others.
egeusz 10 months ago
Power have to be free not capture
didikh 10 months ago
We need unlimited power
MilanNS1096 10 months ago
to all you religious people: I DON'T GIVE A SPACERIP ABOUT WHAT YOU SAY.
alivebygrace 10 months ago
This video is way too dramatic. Its almost as if he's trying to make the topic scary!
Also, how is our universe a closed system? Isn't it expanding?
FindingVickie 10 months ago
religion is a joke
coolazndude92 10 months ago
this has already been uploaded :s
1xgersx1 10 months ago
another meaningless video to waste people's time. Spacerip you're making progress.
lk3hjduio 10 months ago
@lk3hjduio
And how is this useless?
MrHerpeez 10 months ago
Science>>>>then religion is somewhere wayyy down yonder
MrRiggyRiggs 10 months ago
I'll never understand why so many Americans still believe the world was created in 7 days (in Europe religion is close to none existant). They denie the findings of modern science, yet they make use of it every day (the internet, computers, medical care,cars, planes and so on...)
Paiste01 10 months ago
@Paiste01 You can't say that religion in Europe is close to non-existent. I've seen the faithful line up at a French abbey to buy blue toilet-bowl cleaner made by monks. What about Fatima, and Lourdes, and St. James of Compostela?
And religious-based hatred is alive and well in Europe - many people hate other religions and races just as much as their medieval great-great-great-great-great-grandfathers did.
panskeptic 10 months ago
Why on every Spacerip video there is a religious debate ? can't you just watch, learn and have fun......with no agenda ?
tonyblackops 10 months ago 88
@tonyblackops ppl cant keep there mouths shut, im catholic but i open my ideals to everything, i dont understand why ppl cant put religion with science
jorrogboe 10 months ago
@jorrogboe
"i dont understand why ppl cant put religion with science"
Religion is the very antithesis of science. Whereas science always continues to ask questions, religion encourages you to be satisfied with the answers in a given dogma. Whereas science demands rigorous standards of evidence, religion encourages faith. The two are fundamentally incompatible.
sdrawkcabgnipytmi 10 months ago
@tonyblackops Yes. You watch the video, then move on with your self-satisfied self. The ONLY WAY you can become upset or disturbed at all by the comments, is if you purposely scroll down to view them. Don't. Your problem, and 20 others as well, is now solved. Do not scroll down, view no religious debates. You're welcome. ; )
yeshuahfullofit 10 months ago
@tonyblackops it's because youtube is on the front lines of the religion vs. reason discourse, so any video to do with either subject will spawn a certain amount of debate. don't hate on this phenomenon, it's basically free speech at its purest. the trolls and douches are just a small price for this freedom, it's worth putting up with them when you consider the alternatives.
playadominical 10 months ago
@tonyblackops
"religion" and "no agenda" is oxymoronic.
Or
"religion" and "agenda" is tautologic
BiggerThinking1 10 months ago
@tonyblackops
Just goes out to show you how many Religious freaks with nothing better to do in their meaningless lives there are on our poor little planet...
toulouse666 10 months ago
@tonyblackops Yes. It's annoying. But it is also exhilarating. The social taboo against calling out the religious nuts' irrational beliefs in public has finally been overturned. (Thanks, Richard.) We still have a ways to go. But the ignorant in our society are now on the run. Finally, they have to defend their irrational beliefs with facts. And they have to come to terms with the fact that their mothers and reverends, as they were growing up and soaking it all in, were full of shit.
-Steve
sbergman27 5 months ago
The Saturn 5 rocket consumed 15 tons of fuel per second? OMG!
900 Tons per Minute.
4500 tons in 5 Minutes.
How much fuel did Apollo V consumed to reach the exosphere?
BitaminaTek 10 months ago
@BitaminaTek 2.3k tons in the first stage according to wiki
Jonsoncao 10 months ago
@VCanucks93: Solar electric sattelites and microwave energy transfer can supply about 10TW if we do it right. Nuclear could, too, if they'd stop being so PC and playing games of NIMBY and worked on real reactor technology instead of the practically Steam Punk ancient garbage we have now. Travelling Wave Reactors can sonsume "waste" as well as "spent" fuel quite nicely, for instance. Pebble Bed reactors are immune to "meltdown". Waste concentration works. Only politics is in the way.
RyuDarragh 10 months ago
@RyuDarragh Well, nuclear energy is still tricky (though safer than many would like to admit).
Specifically, pebble bed reactor fuel can't be reprocessed, traveling wave reactors have never been built, and breeder reactors have too low of a net energy output to be commercially viable.
Not to say that we shouldn't mature the technology. But on the other side of the fence, politics are a credit to the fact we have any nuclear energy at all; power companies aren't willing to invest in it.
SevenSixTwoNato 10 months ago
@SevenSixTwoNato: Tricky, indeed. But, solutions exist for all of it except the politics :P The pebbles of one design are screwed together and are meant to be reprocessed every 25 Years. Breeders produce net energy by converting normally useless Uranium into usable forms. Most of the trickiness and most of the reluctance is the ham handed regulations that reflect mostly political and non-science based thinking. The reluctance to use a breeder stems mostly from the creation of Pu.
RyuDarragh 10 months ago
Is anyone else terrified by the music?
QuantumGh0st 10 months ago
thank you
iamearthbornami 10 months ago
"Chemical" - *a tv falls on ground*
seriouslyWeird 10 months ago
this looks like an intersting documentry think ill have to look it up
shanecox704 10 months ago
Damn I didn't understand this one. :(
BoeingsAreTheBests 10 months ago
If all energy is conserved, why do we let it slip through our fingers?
Shanjaq 10 months ago
@Shanjaq: The conservation of energy simply means that no matter how inneficient a system may be, in a given volume of space, no energy is lost. If you added up all the work in an event plus all the waste heat and anything lost in subatomic energy transfers, etc, the value would be precisely the same as at the start of the event. Note: It will also never be greater, either.
RyuDarragh 10 months ago
Three-hundred thousandths of a watt... Enough to trigger a werewolf's transformation. Whatever process guides it is awfully energy-efficient.
EdouardDubois 10 months ago
Tsar bomba, the most powerful nuclear weapon tested, generated about 5.4 septillion watts in 39 nanoseconds. The Saturn 5 rocket doesn't even compare. =P
shadesilverwing0 10 months ago
...a super nova created us along with the sun and stars near it , the planet
~having blown its outer body off to do this creating, leaving only as small black hole at its core to one day devour all that it created , as singularitys do until they are again able to explode.
docatomics 10 months ago
Have all of you spacerip guys read a short history of nearly everything?
NoobTubeMeXD 10 months ago
i have a question, please answer if you can. When matter enters a black hole (such as light, planets, or even entire galaxies) what happens to it? Just curious
ShadowiGeneral 10 months ago 4
@ShadowiGeneral i thought it was just degrading, like torn molecule from molecule...
NoobTubeMeXD 10 months ago
@ShadowiGeneral I asked this question of the well-known black hole expert, Kip Thorne, a few years ago. He described matter collapsing into a black hole: "... the matter continues to shrink smaller and smaller and smaller, goes inside the horizon inside the surface of the black hole, shrinks down to the very center where it gets destroyed. In a singularity, a region of infinite warped space in time. And it is gone."
It's converted, he said, to the energy of warped space and time.
SpaceRip 10 months ago 32
@SpaceRip What if a Black Hole it is a physical object, and not actually a hole? And because of it owns gravity absorves everything, increasing its matter and size?
FlyingHeavyMetal737 10 months ago
@FlyingHeavyMetal737 good theory. but then why can't we see them?
minimonster007 10 months ago
@minimonster007 Again, because of its own gravity, light cannot scape from them... The images we see are actually a light reflect from them, so if light cannot scape from this "black hole" we're not able to see it...
FlyingHeavyMetal737 10 months ago
@SpaceRip Yes. and its information escapes that point through the radiation emitted from hte black hole.
superking95 10 months ago
@SpaceRip Great Video!, but I saw this post and am a little confused: can the current physics models answer that question? Doesn't discontinuity between general relativity and quantum mechanics prevent any accurate prediction of the state of super-condensed matter?
TurboLoveTrain 10 months ago
@SpaceRip ...and all the matter turns into spaghetti.
ogicabp4u 10 months ago
@SpaceRip this is incredible
snicp 10 months ago
@SpaceRip There's another theory(actually MANY...) that everything that gets sucked into a black hole, and crushed into a "singularity"(which is a fancy way of saying that the laws of physics as we know it breaks down and we have no explanation) bursts out the "other side" creating another "big bang", creating a completely new universe. Remember, if you subscribe to the big bang theory, it started with a singularity. Think about it, it's a fascinating theory, and actually makes sense.
kree1964 10 months ago 5
@SpaceRip Stephen Hawkings work demonstrated that black holes 'arent so black' and emit radiation jets of gamma rays. Apparently this has been scientifically observed but who really knows for sure.. but these jets of radiation could account for where some or even all of that energy goes. A: it comes back into the universe slowly leached back in the form of high energy radiation
FletcherHabit 10 months ago
@SpaceRip Im reading his book Black Holes and Time Warps and that was a confusing topic.
Smackimation 10 months ago
@ShadowiGeneral ask Stephen
Arghira 10 months ago
@ShadowiGeneral Nothing it just goes on and on... Mybe it does come to a end but we do not know, also if it came to a end! Another part of the universe the planet's and Galaxies may not have much energy, because of it being drained in the force of the black hole whitch the black hole uses to grow bigger and stronger!
I hope it has helped.
snakebite011 10 months ago
@ShadowiGeneral it meets Chuck Norris
dudecomestocum 10 months ago
@dudecomestocum: (2/2) Gravity goes to zero at the very center as it does in any spherical body, but density does not. It's at this point that the space/time ripple that makes up all particles goes to values we have no good math for. What this does to the very notion of subatomic particles is only a guess, but the suspicion is that the very nature of space/time at the singularity changes and conditions like those at the big bang exist. It is the blackest place possible as even photons vanish.
RyuDarragh 10 months ago
@ShadowiGeneral: The best explanation is that it is mostly turned into neutronium somewhere inside the event horizon and followed further in by other "degenerate" states of matter until you get to the "singularity" where things get wierd indeed. Light further out becomes electrons (just as electrons/positrons become gamma rays) and those in turn join the protons and become neutrons, then degenerate matter (sometimes called a quark soup). (1/2)
RyuDarragh 10 months ago
I'm not sure if I've seen this video before, but I'm definitely sure I will never see enough power of science...
HellaUtube 10 months ago
I have seen this video before o.O
puntofamily 10 months ago
It's amazing to think that the largest power harnessed, the Saturn 5 rocket, was 40 years ago.
CurtHowland 10 months ago
@CurtHowland It's depressing for me; we have the technology for stronger rockets, we have the money, the government just won't allocate it.
PaleBlueVoice 10 months ago
@PaleBlueVoice I would suggest that your reliance on govt is the problem, not technology.
CurtHowland 10 months ago
@CurtHowland Governments have to get space exploration started; once we start getting valuble resources from asteroids, the moon and mars(and eventually venus), and there's financial incentive, then the corporations can take over, but right now, it's moving stagnantly slow. Obama can't find money for the constellation program, but he can hundreds of millions of dollars worth of missiles to send to other countries ON THE FIRST DAY.
PaleBlueVoice 10 months ago
@PaleBlueVoice Govts were able to spend the extraordinary quantity of treasure needed when such efforts were inefficient. Technology has improved, and now it's nearly "efficient" to get out of the gravity well.
As such, private space efforts are spreading and the profitable, that is 'efficient'', use of space can begin.
I agree that govt is inefficient. the Apollo program was mostly to prove to the Russians that the US could put any bomb, no matter how big, anywhere on the planet.
CurtHowland 10 months ago
Corporations will never be able to serve the role of NASA, ESO, and similar.
What is the incentive to sink ten billion dollars into a new space telescope, or a similar amount into a space probe?
No, corporations will take actions that benefit their bottom line - mining, tourism, military...and if the airlines are any indication, the order of priorities will be profit, profit, profit, profit, maybe PR, profit, maybe safety, profit, profit, sustainability, profit, profit.
1RadicalOne 10 months ago 3
@1RadicalOne "What is the incentive"
The only reason those projects cost so much is that the taxpayer provides a blank check, while the politicians use that bottomless well of money to pay off their campaign contributors.
You want it, I want it, so do many other people. So you, and I, and many other people, contribute to the project to build/launch it. Private satellites, private launch facilities and systems, already exist.
So do non-profit organizations of interested individuals. Just do it.
CurtHowland 10 months ago
"Private satellites, private launch facilities and systems, already exist."
Yes, and what are those used for? Proprietary technology. Do you see Motorola launching satellites to study comets? No, you see them enhancing their network. Which you of course must pay to use.
See a pattern?
Not to mention, once larger manned craft are privatized, corporations will cut corners like they do everywhere else. Except when the hull of a spacecraft rips open due to cheap parts...fill in the rest.
1RadicalOne 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@1RadicalOne "See a pattern?"
Yes. The safe and profitable use of space.
"Except when the hull of a spacecraft rips open due to cheap parts...fill in the rest."
You obviously have no idea how liability insurance works.
A govt craft blows up killing all on board...nothing. A private craft will have to satisfy both their customers, and their insurance company's safety requirements.
CurtHowland 10 months ago
@PaleBlueVoice Obama is right... we have to take care of the things here on Earth before we can worry about anything up in space.
zestydude87 10 months ago
wow I guess I missed the flame war based on the top comments. Anyways, good visual as always by SpaceRip. I just wish I could travel into space.
NobbyKNobbs 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
is it worth going to college?
TheLeadStriker 10 months ago
time and space is educational
nc17atnce101 10 months ago
This is crazy. This comment too roughly a 100J of energy
BIGBOSSTEDDY 10 months ago
I really love your videos and your channel, but now you're just uploading abridged versions of your older uploads... honestly?
DRAKULU 10 months ago
Everyone, if u like space vids then go onto " Vsauce" and go on their leanback playlist its really good and its about space,it will really make you go WOW, and maybe be a bit scared. Its rly good
alexrockclimber 10 months ago
Out of curiosity, if people don't want to be exposed to annoying trolls, why do they check the comments?
Andy32268 10 months ago
Science Win
fishbone937 10 months ago
Cool video just really short. I wish it were longer. However I really enjoy these videos that you post. Youre awesome!!!
Bronnie79 10 months ago
It's not how much energy do we need, it's how to get more than we need. I don't like it when people start talking about energy as a collective bargaining. Too much of a communism for me. New World Order coming through the use of energy.
shoa31 10 months ago
Great video. Keep it up. I love watching stuff about space and the like.
TheGenuineChristian 10 months ago
Comment removed
ProtonRS 10 months ago
Comment removed
ProtonRS 10 months ago
Love you SpaceRip. Ignore the trolls and haters of science. Keep on keeping on dude. GREAT CLIP!
ns88ster 10 months ago
haha the tweet part was irrelevant...did they pay you to say that?
summergreen500 10 months ago
@summergreen500 first of all you used irrelevant wrong, second of all the tweet part was to get viewers interested to something they can actually relate to...
Reallaty 10 months ago
@Reallaty i just thought it was kind of random, that's all :)
summergreen500 10 months ago
why have you re uploaded this, don't get me wrong it's awesome, but seems a bit pointless? it's not even the complete feature.
SadeofDarkness 10 months ago
Hey SpaceRip, Thanks
XeEnjoi 10 months ago
Now that you mentioned his name (Dick Rodstein) he is good and really fits in with SpaceRip's videos.
sterlingman 10 months ago
What are people fighting over??
FCule 10 months ago
This narrator has the Best voice EVER!
He should have been the guy to narrate for the movie, war of the worlds.
joytech23 10 months ago
Science doesn't care about religion. Science only cares about science. However, if science were a religion, I would join! Awesome video. Thanks SpaceRip, keep 'em coming!!!
ReligousTruth 10 months ago 48
@ReligousTruth If science was a religion, every person who already had a religion would be dead, seeing as they cannot follow other religions, and medicine is science... maybe we can erase religion by making science a religion...
soulsistah102 10 months ago
@soulsistah102: No. Religion is dogmatic and cannot admit error. It does not self correct or test. Remember the definition of "Faith" as "Belief without evidence or proof." That is antithetical to science.
RyuDarragh 10 months ago 3
@RyuDarragh Well.. I guess you're right.. I just wish that religion wasn't here. I mean, it's kind of stupid. Trying to persuade people in fairy tales. Can't we come up with a scientific way instead of believing in a big man in the sky with a beard?
soulsistah102 10 months ago
@soulsistah102: We do have a way. It requires no belief without evidence. No supernatural anything. Humanism has been demoised by the religious because it advocates proper ways of behaving based on the welfare of all humans and all life on the planet, but without their "God". It recognizes that humans are fallible, but can always do better. One is expected to grow up and mature, becomming a rational being. Religion tends towards infantilizing its followers and that provides an excuse for "Evil".
RyuDarragh 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ReligousTruth Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind. - Albert Einstein
eefree89 10 months ago
@ReligousTruth
That is very silly statement. God bless You!
24corrdi24 10 months ago
@ReligousTruth science =/=religion
ancientpatrician 10 months ago
I thought absolute zero was the maximum for cold and that there was nothing colder.
Ownzian 10 months ago
@Ownzian that is correct. the molecules in that nebula were 1 degree warmer than abosolute zero
JackyRBKwan 10 months ago
@JackyRBKwan Ah, I misunderstood I thought above meant colder.
Ownzian 10 months ago
The simplest definition of energy I ever heard was: Energy=matter in motion.
MsWanderer1 10 months ago
Great spacerip me more and more passionate
perfettosconosciuto1 10 months ago
what about all the energy that goes into a black hole?
fpsd0minat0r 10 months ago
this was awesome
uiuiuiseraph 10 months ago
Fantastic video yet again. :)
BedroomBassist 10 months ago
We will never fully understand anything, cause we will all be dead by then.. I mean everything around our Sun. Sleep tight...
LosAngelesWeedSmoker 10 months ago
This's so great to consider for common people like myself :) Remarkable components of the universe being associated with very tangible ideas... love it, thanks for posting
EatYourBeans 10 months ago
Kinetic!!!
NrrN00 10 months ago
LOL i just watched the full version of this 2 days ago, and now an excerpt is up. great minds think alike, huh spacerip? :)
Ivin3690 10 months ago
How do we know our universe is a closed system? (Honest question...)
YourBrainOnReligion 10 months ago
@YourBrainOnReligion because you name Universe everything that exist and that means that the Universe is a close system closed by the "nothingness" and if you believe in a Multiverse the same principal applies to it
(I have explained the best that I could related to my English skills)
dexro2005 10 months ago
@dexro2005 Ahh okay, the possibility of a multiverse is precisely why I was asking. Seems to me that a multiverse scenario wouldn't necessarily mean they're entirely closed from one another. But I guess that's more philosophy than scientific speculation as it's still in the realm of the untestable. Thanks for your reply.
YourBrainOnReligion 10 months ago