1)which is why it's compared energy output is that of the largest nuke ever set off.
2)If the tsar bomb isn't effective at producing energy I would like you to go stand next to it while it's set off. There's enough energy there to convert your mass into base molecules or energy whatever have you. Now in the sense of using the energy and controlling it than no something like that cannot be contained.
This got me thinking.. If you can create energy out of matter, what would you create if you applied the same process to anti-matter? Would it be energy or some weird form of anti-energy?
And if the answer is energy, wouldn't that be a potential explanation for why there's more matter than anti-matter in the universe, allowing it to exist? Because more anti-matter than matter exists in the form of energy?
No. If the matter and antimatter were of equal mass and density, then they would cancel each other out and you would have a nuclear explosion equivalent to two or three Tzar Bombs (57 megatons...EACH)
According to accepted theory but lets face it, we ent never gonna really know but I think its damned arrogant to think we're gonna ever really know anything about anything. All we have is a guess at what happened, sorry I mean theory as to what happened
@istillloveguitar antimatter isn't "negative", it's "opposite". So an electron's antimatter "twin", called a positron, has a positive charge. Everything is the same except the charge. Same deal for the positively charged protons and their evil twin, the anti-proton (that has a negative charge).
"Positive" and "negative" refer to the charges of the atomic and anti-atomic nuclei. Matter has a positively charged nucleus and antimatter has a negatively charged nucleus. *So you are both right and wrong.*
@ThePhantom710 true but incomplete; you're only talking about atoms. The definition for "matter" applies to the subatomic as well. The electron is neither a part of an atom's nucleus nor is it positively charged but is still considered to be matter. I would also suggest (and I'm not the only one) that the neutron is considered to be matter.
@istillloveguitar Hey there, to explain: antimatter are particles that are the same as matter particles but with a reverse charge: instead of protons, they have negatively-charged antiprotons. Instead of electrons, they have positively-charged positrons. And so on and so forth. Further, protons and antiprotons would both have the same mass, and identical other traits excepting their charge. Does that make more sense?
Not quite, when you change the signs to some numbers in certain equations that describe the laws of physics that govern our universe, you don't just get the same outcome but with a minus sign before it, you get totally different results.
Matter and antimatter are exact opposites. you would get the same results, the matter one being positive and the antimatter one being negative. So, according to the rules of mathematics, yes you do get the same answer with a minus sign before it because you are adding a positive with a positive and a negative with a negative. You're not adding a positive with a negative, from which you'll get zero (assuming that the positive and negative are exact opposites).
@ThePhantom710 (-1) + (-1) = -2 true. What happens when you have equations that involve squaring though?
When you do the math and apply the rules of physics for matter to anti-matter you don't get an identical universe. That was the initial question I replied to. Someone asked 'if anti-matter had won over matter wouldn't we just call it matter and have the same laws of physics only with a different sign?' and the answer to that is no.
@taimawad I'm looking... I see a young guy's face brimming with hope and adventure, smiling at himself with admiration, knowing he's going to get far in his life.
What do YOU see? An asshole that gets his kicks by dissing people based on their religion?
A few grams of antimatter could get you to Mars in 6 months. Trouble is it would cost billions to make and take more time to manufacture than the universe has been in existence. I think antimatter as a fuel source won't be happening any time soon using present day tech.
@TK42138 The problem is, "How to contain it?" we need a magnetic container to keep it away from touching anything that is matter or it will be destroyed, so yeah.. A long way in the future we can use it to fuel the engines.
@AfinitiDigital They have proved it look at the partical accelerator it makes antimatter and I could be used for fuels and such cause of the pure energy out put of combining matter and antimatter. They say 1 kg of both matter an antimatter combined would make an explosion close to that of the Tsar Bomb the largest nuke ever set off.
@ShadowHawk05 Yea they have proved antimatter is real, and i do believe it is, just that saying things like "Oh yea there was a whole fucking battle of anti matter vs matter and it was so close that matter won by one particle" is pure fantasy at this point, without a time machine they'll never know.
2. The Tsar Bomb, while powerful for a nuke, wasn't actually that effective in terms of producing energy.
3. In order to create matter and anti-matter pairs you need amounts of energy that exceed the energy which is released by their reunification, otherwise it would be a perpetuum mobile. It's basic logic.
@killetrocitystick These people are running on theorys, but dont label as such, and i didnt say god was real, and if i was an atheist i wouldn't just take their word for it just because it counters religious beliefs. Also they go to SPECIFIC ASS NUMBERS of how many antimatter and matter particles there were, what did they make a time machine, go back and count every specific one? NO, so until they do, its all theory.
@AfinitiDigital Yes theory. It's because they ACTUALLY DO CALCULATIONS AND EXPIREMENTS!! They wouldn't go up and say "LOL HEY GUYS I THINK THIS IS REAL SO IT IS LOL DERP" They spend months doing calculations and expirements before they say anything. Stop being a dumbass and if you wan't to understand, become a Physicist and understand it.
@killetrocitystick Yes they do calculations and shit, but they still didnt say theory ONCE, there representing it like fact, and they back it up with cool graphics. Get some sense, im not saying this is total bullshit, but they shouldnt mislead people into think things that arent true (yet).
LOL,,,I disagree with you both! There is this planckian fabric of space-time, it has a top face and bottom face - yes, there is potential for it to be a Mobius surface or a Klein bottle surface. We start with effervescent foam that is too rarified to even understand how time is acrued! There is a fractal nature to the build-up of interfaces/partitions & a need for top and bottom faces to pair up. Knots & "membranes" need dimensions that must to be built first. Matter as we know it is on view.
@ohwhererehwho Exactly! Finally someone who sees the importance of the study of fractals and knots in physics and how it can be applied to the planck space-time fabric link with the m-brane theories. Instead of 'bubble' universes, i believe in knots and fractals. Good post Oh.
@cassiopex Thank you! I've been fascinated by theortical physics since the 1970s when I found too many conceptual flaws in mainstream preaching. It was brought to my attention the other day that Feynman questioned whether time's arrow goes in the reverse direction for anti-matter. Eureka! So that is where most antimatter went! It went in the reverse direction from time's origin. COOL! The physics of boundary partitions also comes into play at all scales with fractal "growth" characteristics.
@dasudosomina think of matter and antimater as atoms matter is a positive charge antimatter a negative. When they collide a nuclear explosion occurs. If there's an equal amount that would mean a universe with no mass and if more antimatter there wouldn't be anything like the universe we have today.
@neveranythingtodoXD apparently that wouldn't work the clusters and super clusters are expanding even faster than during the big bang the universe is not slowing down but excelerating so such a thing might not be possible.
BIG BANG PROVED WRONG!!!!!! YAY!!!! German scientist found a particle faster than light and gravaty that the size of a cell. This leads to teleportaion and time travel to 30 seconds in the past! As well as anti matter and matter tech. E=mc square is wrong. And if matter can be created big bang NERVER happened because it sates matter can't be created or destroyed following E=mc square.
dimensions i have noticed that i think your perspective a god in general is that similar of Einstien's. (God created the Universe but then left it alone) In my own opinion (or maybe just misunderstanding), is that if god were to be in the seventh, and he created the universe in needs of creativity, wouldnt he be in this one? Or is a god merely the idea of two unstabe universes creating a stable one.
@naturalantiagingskin thank-you for seeing my comment and for making time to reply ...do you mean ...that question is more real than asking the question did Moses separate the river...
It still only makes sense that there is the same amount of anti-matter for our matter somewhere far out in space. It may be an impossible distance away but never the less. When some smhoo asks "How did something come from nothing" I answer "Well if you add it all up that's what you get".
Captain..I can't git the dilithium crystals into the matter- anti-matter compression chamber without blowin us ta smithereens.... (Mr. Scott circa stardate 5923.9)
@TheLifeDegenerator There really is antimatter. They have isolated it in labs using a magnetic field, they have only made a few atoms at a time that don't last that long, but they have isolated it.
@TheLifeDegenerator they made anti matter already and it's held in labs. We make about 0.0001 grams a year and thats just a few atoms but they die quickly. Open your mind to thing the universe is quite ridiculous but that never means it's not real.
the most intrigueing thing i thought richard feynman saying how anti-matter gong forward in time is just matter going backwards in time, and how therefore anti-matter going backwards in time is the same thing as normal matter going forwards..
Okay, so... I've had people tell me that the "Big Bang" wasn't an explosion, that it was just an expansion of an object that was smaller than a proton... Yet what i get from this video and "The Search for Antimatter" is that there was a massive explosion (hence the name "Big Bang") Yet, if there was actually an explosion of that size, or any explosion for that matter at that time... Don't you think that the order of all the matter within that central point would be scattered all over the place?
meaning there would be no stars, galaxies, or even life on earth, meaning we wouldn't exist, there is no way a "Big Bang" is able to create a universe so synchronized (Solar systems, galaxies, ect...) Think, about a spiral galaxy, then look at our solar system, then... look at an atom... any resemblance? Now... how can one theory make this one shape, simply disappear? How come astronomists aren't able to come up with the theory, that galaxies are spinning around a central point in the universe?
Why is there no way? Also, If this "central point" was where the explosion took place, what would be there to orbit around? an empty space? If everything is expanding from that center point then relative to other objects they don't appear to be moving at all, except when gravitating towards denser objects nearby. So gravity organizes the leftover material into galaxies and within them smaller examples(solar systems, moons orbiting planets, etc).
@Kojitsu Where would this gravity come from if there is NOTHING that has such a gravitational pull to actually pull the gasses ect. together to create said galaxies, solar systems, planets, ect...
Refer to this website: h t t p : / / thetruth(dot)joltnetworx(dot)com
lol nothing? all mass has gravity, including gas. I wouldn't expect such an expansion to be uniform, certainly there were more denser areas of gas that would eventually come together, no matter how small the gravity, and they would eventually attract together and become denser and denser, the gravity would then over time increase.
@neveranythingtodoXD ... I like your thinking very much. however about big bang, it did not create solar systems etc. It was gravity that created them, billions of years after the Bang, when denser areas with particles attracted others due to gravity, and slowly created everything, very slowly. All other forces helped and shaped this universe but without gravity it wouldn;t start I guess.
Unless of course, we exchange Gravity for the hebrew God. (No offense intended - just mentioning)
@neveranythingtodoXD that might actually be possible come back with some math to support it and then you're officially a Nobel physics nominee, that would basically mean our moon orbits us we orbit our star our star orbits the galaxy and the galaxys orbits the cluster defused galaxy and super clusters orbit the center.
@neveranythingtodoXD your image of an atom that looks like a solar system is not correct. And where the fuck did you hear that galaxies are spinning around a central point in the universe?
@Rusvi1 Actually, no... i was actually sharing my ideas, like many others on these videos, and i find your comments to be very rude, and annoying, so if you have any sense of common courtesy, i would very much appreciate it if you stopped replying to me...
@Rusvi1 How is it not possible for galaxies to rotate around a central point? Explain that to me please, how is it impossble? If you can't answer that? GTFO...
@neveranythingtodoXD Reality is a bitch...especially for people like you. It's not possible because observations tell us otherwise. ....elementary facts about the universe you live in...
@neveranythingtodoXD because its not a theory, its a fact that galaxies are spinning around their central point, but this is about where the entire galaxy moves
please listen to the damn video next time rather than just reading the comments. First of all, you must be RETARD to not having any background info about the Big Bang Theory, search it up dumass. Second search up "Universe created from nothing". Third, listen carefully when u click on this 1:38 - 1:49
so if the thoery of the existance of a multiverse is true/ would it be possible that there is a univeres the consists of only antimatter? and if so, how could it exist in the same dimension as another universe with matter. if you think about it, if we did live in a miltiverse, what are the chances that every universe that was created was matter?
@visitor44534 Think of the -verses(?) are contained in bubbles. So there could, in fact be an antimatter verse, but it is separate from other verses by the distances between each bubble. And the area between these verses has no matter.
This is how I have taken the explanations from professors like Dr. Kaku and others.
@visitor44534 But we don't know how old these verses are, or if they do in fact continue to expand. Could some actually fall in on themselves? And no one ever said how large this expanse was. For all we know, it could be infinitely large and the bubbles have an effect like magnets to where they never touch. I have no idea. I've never heard more than the "Bubbles in an expanse" theory. I'm adding possibilities as I go.
@HimesInu thats true. its just unfathmable the there is so much "space" out there andwhen i think abt this kinda stuff, it make me feel so insignificant
@visitor44534 Shit, when I think of just our solar system, I feel insignificant. Then I remember that it takes only one man, one idea, to move mountains. Or, in this case, verses.
@visitor44534 Who knows? It could be you. Could be me. All you have to do is remember what Einstein, Galileo, Tesla, da Vinci, any of the great minds did for their respected fields, and even for science. They literally moved mountains when they came up with their theories or inventions.
How do we know that the universe is primarily terrene matter if antimatter looks exactly the same? How do we know there aren't entire superclusters of antimatter?
@Orenotter it doesnt look like the same, if everything in the universe would be anitmatter it would behave the same as the usual matter. the difference is that all protons and electrones switch places i.e. that the electrons are in the nucleus und the protons are surrounding the nucleus.
and why there arent clusters is because if matter and antimatter would be next to each other they would set instantly the strong force free because they attract each other sinc its +&- instead -&- = rejecting
incorrect. The neucleus is made of antiprotons and antineutrons. Orbiting it are electrons. These are exactly the same as their counterparts except for their charges. This includes the chromodynamic charge, which governs the strong force. The antiquarks which make up the neucleus are antired, antigreen and antiblue, which attract each other the same as red, green and blue. (cont'd)
And superclusters are millions of light years apart. They would not be next to each other. Even if they were, both the strong force and the EM force would balance to neutral. The only attraction would be gravity.
So back to my original point: a galaxy made up of antimatter would look and act exactly like a galaxy made of terrene matter. I know of no way to test the charge of its neucleons at this distance. How do we know that there aren't antimatter galaxies?
@nikon1dsmarkIII Yeah, i forgot that. the atoms destroyed turn INTO energy. however, how about Newton's law of physics saying for each action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. therefore, there should be an equal amount of matter and antimatter. also, i do not think that this is the cause of the big bang although I think it IS an after shock of a greater event...
@johnmattas0 What does Newton's Law of motion has to do with this. I think when it comes to particle physics, especially quantum physics like matters and anti-maters those laws doesn't hold true anymore, much like the law of conservation of mass is no longer true when it comes to nuclear reactions.
Someone high fiving their antimatter clone would definitely go down as the greatest high five in history.
awesomesauce7777 4 days ago
Oh Michio, you know everything. Why haven't you started your own pseudo-scientific cult like religion. I would be a believer.
MLGxxPr0Sn1P3rXB3AST 6 days ago
anti-matter is actualy reversed matter :O "chock face"
sergiostudios 6 days ago
antimatter is more powerful can destroy a one planet
maskman973 1 week ago
@Daymjo
1)which is why it's compared energy output is that of the largest nuke ever set off.
2)If the tsar bomb isn't effective at producing energy I would like you to go stand next to it while it's set off. There's enough energy there to convert your mass into base molecules or energy whatever have you. Now in the sense of using the energy and controlling it than no something like that cannot be contained.
3)There was no disagreement there
ShadowHawk05 2 weeks ago
This got me thinking.. If you can create energy out of matter, what would you create if you applied the same process to anti-matter? Would it be energy or some weird form of anti-energy?
And if the answer is energy, wouldn't that be a potential explanation for why there's more matter than anti-matter in the universe, allowing it to exist? Because more anti-matter than matter exists in the form of energy?
Daymjo 2 weeks ago
I always think of Yoda when looking at this guy
IhasMetal 3 weeks ago
so if i would get coin sized matter and anti matter, and if i would combine them together. i would have a small universe in my room?
Puffigs 1 month ago
@Puffigs No, just a very big hole in the ground where the city you lived in was.
kokofan50 1 month ago
@Puffigs
No. If the matter and antimatter were of equal mass and density, then they would cancel each other out and you would have a nuclear explosion equivalent to two or three Tzar Bombs (57 megatons...EACH)
ThePhantom710 2 weeks ago
prove it ?...
xbuster17 1 month ago
@xbuster17 Prove what?
Aviatorsmith 1 month ago
@xbuster17
Look up at night.
ThePhantom710 2 weeks ago
this video made me feel like a tiny nothing -_-
296192001 1 month ago
poor fools obsessing over material things
xtaskillz 1 month ago
hrd to masturbade while watching this... but i did it!!
1234nejko 1 month ago
@1234nejko that joke was old in 1999!
8Zeitgeist 1 month ago
@8Zeitgeist yea... i know but i still like to basturbade
1234nejko 1 month ago
God created everything.
xtaskillz 1 month ago
@xtaskillz Hah, oh you're serious? let me laugh even louder.
CodGeronimo 1 month ago
@xtaskillz
Then what or who created God?
ThePhantom710 2 weeks ago
And in 100 years they'll come up with a new theory...
NewVahan2011 1 month ago
@NewVahan2011 This isn't a theory.
Aviatorsmith 1 month ago
@Aviatorsmith
How so?
ThePhantom710 2 weeks ago
I discovered a continuum! Eat a bunch of beans, let the pressure build, and release with a silent constant and that's it! A continuum!
Ricku571 1 month ago 11
According to accepted theory but lets face it, we ent never gonna really know but I think its damned arrogant to think we're gonna ever really know anything about anything. All we have is a guess at what happened, sorry I mean theory as to what happened
BrummieTrev 1 month ago
@BrummieTrev but it wouldn't hurt to try and find out would it now? We can be a little ambitious right?
callawaydekluizen 1 month ago
hey where did these two objects came from?
janmauricepogi 1 month ago
antimatter is negative charged? so how difference it is from an electron?
istillloveguitar 2 months ago
@istillloveguitar antimatter isn't "negative", it's "opposite". So an electron's antimatter "twin", called a positron, has a positive charge. Everything is the same except the charge. Same deal for the positively charged protons and their evil twin, the anti-proton (that has a negative charge).
joemasserini 1 month ago
@joemasserini
"Positive" and "negative" refer to the charges of the atomic and anti-atomic nuclei. Matter has a positively charged nucleus and antimatter has a negatively charged nucleus. *So you are both right and wrong.*
* This statement might require doublethink.*
ThePhantom710 2 weeks ago
@ThePhantom710 true but incomplete; you're only talking about atoms. The definition for "matter" applies to the subatomic as well. The electron is neither a part of an atom's nucleus nor is it positively charged but is still considered to be matter. I would also suggest (and I'm not the only one) that the neutron is considered to be matter.
joemasserini 6 days ago
@ThePhantom710 I meant to add that matter AND its associated charges apply at the subatomic level as well.
joemasserini 6 days ago
@istillloveguitar Hey there, to explain: antimatter are particles that are the same as matter particles but with a reverse charge: instead of protons, they have negatively-charged antiprotons. Instead of electrons, they have positively-charged positrons. And so on and so forth. Further, protons and antiprotons would both have the same mass, and identical other traits excepting their charge. Does that make more sense?
EsotericMouse 1 month ago
1. Play this video.
2. Pause this video.
3. watch man sticks his head up girls ass --->
xd
attacknickdemko 2 months ago 30
@attacknickdemko I don't get it. ? I play and pause and I don't see any of that. what are you talking about?
MrEzish 1 month ago
@MrEzish Look at the suggestion column to your right. Seven videos down. :)
Dakookoo 1 month ago
@attacknickdemko That's pretty immature, man.
DopingBox 1 month ago
if antimatter won, wouldn't we call that matter? because we were then made of it
ekiep 2 months ago
Not quite, when you change the signs to some numbers in certain equations that describe the laws of physics that govern our universe, you don't just get the same outcome but with a minus sign before it, you get totally different results.
Daymjo 1 month ago
@Daymjo
1+1=2
(-1)+(-1)=(-2)
Matter and antimatter are exact opposites. you would get the same results, the matter one being positive and the antimatter one being negative. So, according to the rules of mathematics, yes you do get the same answer with a minus sign before it because you are adding a positive with a positive and a negative with a negative. You're not adding a positive with a negative, from which you'll get zero (assuming that the positive and negative are exact opposites).
ThePhantom710 2 weeks ago
@ThePhantom710 (-1) + (-1) = -2 true. What happens when you have equations that involve squaring though?
When you do the math and apply the rules of physics for matter to anti-matter you don't get an identical universe. That was the initial question I replied to. Someone asked 'if anti-matter had won over matter wouldn't we just call it matter and have the same laws of physics only with a different sign?' and the answer to that is no.
Daymjo 2 weeks ago
@ekiep
yes, considering there were no Homo sapians 14.6 billion years ago
ThePhantom710 2 weeks ago
True... so many scientists say shit, support it with a few evidence and make it look cool. Then EVERYONE believes it!! YAY FOR CLONES
Chuckalakala 2 months ago
@Chuckalakala I can assume you're on the religious side.
If you are..
Then...
If so..
Take a look at the mirror pl0x
taimawad 2 months ago
@taimawad I'm looking... I see a young guy's face brimming with hope and adventure, smiling at himself with admiration, knowing he's going to get far in his life.
What do YOU see? An asshole that gets his kicks by dissing people based on their religion?
Chuckalakala 2 months ago
@Chuckalakala Sorry, you're the clones.
taimawad 2 months ago
A few grams of antimatter could get you to Mars in 6 months. Trouble is it would cost billions to make and take more time to manufacture than the universe has been in existence. I think antimatter as a fuel source won't be happening any time soon using present day tech.
TK42138 2 months ago
@TK42138 The problem is, "How to contain it?" we need a magnetic container to keep it away from touching anything that is matter or it will be destroyed, so yeah.. A long way in the future we can use it to fuel the engines.
quangluu96 2 months ago
@AfinitiDigital They have proved it look at the partical accelerator it makes antimatter and I could be used for fuels and such cause of the pure energy out put of combining matter and antimatter. They say 1 kg of both matter an antimatter combined would make an explosion close to that of the Tsar Bomb the largest nuke ever set off.
ShadowHawk05 2 months ago
@ShadowHawk05 Yea they have proved antimatter is real, and i do believe it is, just that saying things like "Oh yea there was a whole fucking battle of anti matter vs matter and it was so close that matter won by one particle" is pure fantasy at this point, without a time machine they'll never know.
AfinitiDigital 2 months ago
@ShadowHawk05
1. 1kg is ALOT of anti matter.
2. The Tsar Bomb, while powerful for a nuke, wasn't actually that effective in terms of producing energy.
3. In order to create matter and anti-matter pairs you need amounts of energy that exceed the energy which is released by their reunification, otherwise it would be a perpetuum mobile. It's basic logic.
Daymjo 2 weeks ago
wtf thers no way that they can prove this shit
AfinitiDigital 2 months ago
@AfinitiDigital There is no way you can prove god is real. These people are way smarter than you. Go get a job.
killetrocitystick 2 months ago
@killetrocitystick These people are running on theorys, but dont label as such, and i didnt say god was real, and if i was an atheist i wouldn't just take their word for it just because it counters religious beliefs. Also they go to SPECIFIC ASS NUMBERS of how many antimatter and matter particles there were, what did they make a time machine, go back and count every specific one? NO, so until they do, its all theory.
AfinitiDigital 2 months ago
@AfinitiDigital Yes theory. It's because they ACTUALLY DO CALCULATIONS AND EXPIREMENTS!! They wouldn't go up and say "LOL HEY GUYS I THINK THIS IS REAL SO IT IS LOL DERP" They spend months doing calculations and expirements before they say anything. Stop being a dumbass and if you wan't to understand, become a Physicist and understand it.
killetrocitystick 2 months ago
@killetrocitystick Yes they do calculations and shit, but they still didnt say theory ONCE, there representing it like fact, and they back it up with cool graphics. Get some sense, im not saying this is total bullshit, but they shouldnt mislead people into think things that arent true (yet).
AfinitiDigital 2 months ago
@AfinitiDigital lol
asianDTC 2 months ago
=[) for further information, u can find them in the DragonBall series =[)
brokenFlask 2 months ago
they would blow them selves... >_<
CognitiveNetwork 2 months ago
well fuck.
rccppt 2 months ago
I learn something today antimatter +matter= boom
Sheenyxiny 2 months ago
I really think there wrong! Sorry!
Cjpmatt 2 months ago
Is it possible some of those antimatter never got close enough to regular matter and was able to form a galaxy? That would be cool.
Jeebs24 2 months ago
im kind of simple minded i just like to watch these for their animations :P
nattack1010 3 months ago
@nattack1010 : hahaha same here :)
sbug65 3 months ago
Wait matter and and anti-matter cancel each other out right? But they explode releasing particles, I don't get it, do the particles disappear too?
Blankskeen 3 months ago
@Blankskeen They release radiatio, which may have looked like particles in the video for sake of demonstration.
lekremyelsew 3 months ago
if they teach this in our school...i would never miss a day...
ItsmeReiRei 3 months ago
I wonder how the universe would be if their was 10% more matter, not like I really believe in this stuff but I am just wondering.
Scionwoods 3 months ago
THUMBS UP IF U THUMBS'D UP BOTH TOP COMMENTS...
Alankartambe1 3 months ago
Theres science in this shit
haroldman123456 3 months ago
Antimatter builds dark matter and dimensions, Relativistic Perturbation Mantle
fulely 3 months ago
LOL,,,I disagree with you both! There is this planckian fabric of space-time, it has a top face and bottom face - yes, there is potential for it to be a Mobius surface or a Klein bottle surface. We start with effervescent foam that is too rarified to even understand how time is acrued! There is a fractal nature to the build-up of interfaces/partitions & a need for top and bottom faces to pair up. Knots & "membranes" need dimensions that must to be built first. Matter as we know it is on view.
ohwhererehwho 3 months ago
@ohwhererehwho Exactly! Finally someone who sees the importance of the study of fractals and knots in physics and how it can be applied to the planck space-time fabric link with the m-brane theories. Instead of 'bubble' universes, i believe in knots and fractals. Good post Oh.
cassiopex 3 months ago
@cassiopex Thank you! I've been fascinated by theortical physics since the 1970s when I found too many conceptual flaws in mainstream preaching. It was brought to my attention the other day that Feynman questioned whether time's arrow goes in the reverse direction for anti-matter. Eureka! So that is where most antimatter went! It went in the reverse direction from time's origin. COOL! The physics of boundary partitions also comes into play at all scales with fractal "growth" characteristics.
ohwhererehwho 3 months ago
An anti Kako would be smart.
qixxxz 4 months ago
So...when comes the warp drive???
rrave24 4 months ago
@dasudosomina think of matter and antimater as atoms matter is a positive charge antimatter a negative. When they collide a nuclear explosion occurs. If there's an equal amount that would mean a universe with no mass and if more antimatter there wouldn't be anything like the universe we have today.
MrAwesomesauce101 4 months ago
@neveranythingtodoXD apparently that wouldn't work the clusters and super clusters are expanding even faster than during the big bang the universe is not slowing down but excelerating so such a thing might not be possible.
MrAwesomesauce101 4 months ago
so it would have been the same shit if the anti matter won, right? :s
dasudosomia 4 months ago
@dasudosomia no our universe wouldn't exist.
MrAwesomesauce101 4 months ago
@MrAwesomesauce101 how though, he said that its the same thing basically :/
dasudosomia 4 months ago
BIG BANG PROVED WRONG!!!!!! YAY!!!! German scientist found a particle faster than light and gravaty that the size of a cell. This leads to teleportaion and time travel to 30 seconds in the past! As well as anti matter and matter tech. E=mc square is wrong. And if matter can be created big bang NERVER happened because it sates matter can't be created or destroyed following E=mc square.
IsaacD39 4 months ago
1 gram is enough to blow the shit outa texas and russia. we can make 0.0001 gram a year. We started 2 years ago...
IsaacD39 4 months ago
Oooooh, so THAT'S where the idea of Titanomachy comes from :D
TheDarthBartus 4 months ago
Does it all really matter?
handsupbud 4 months ago
@handsupbud No not until we physically discover it
Yashman17 4 months ago
who create matter & anti matter, its means our God the father who create everything
rollstell1 5 months ago
@rollstell1 NO, it's Thor, the only true god...
Acrimonator 5 months ago
@rollstell1 ur dad is not god >.>
marioftwpwned 4 months ago
Comment removed
rollstell1 4 months ago
@marioftwpwned I BELIEVED IN GOD PERIOD.
rollstell1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dimensions i have noticed that i think your perspective a god in general is that similar of Einstien's. (God created the Universe but then left it alone) In my own opinion (or maybe just misunderstanding), is that if god were to be in the seventh, and he created the universe in needs of creativity, wouldnt he be in this one? Or is a god merely the idea of two unstabe universes creating a stable one.
rollstell1 4 months ago
hmmm so we can make bomb from it? i already have have plan but....it takes billions of dollars! america would have the strongest army...wait what?
HaX0rZ1000 5 months ago
what a story! ...how can scientists tell such stories?!?
gaiagale 5 months ago
Comment removed
naturalantiagingskin 4 months ago
@gaiagale that question more on reality than asking question how moses separate the river? ^_^
naturalantiagingskin 4 months ago
@naturalantiagingskin thank-you for seeing my comment and for making time to reply ...do you mean ...that question is more real than asking the question did Moses separate the river...
gaiagale 4 months ago
It still only makes sense that there is the same amount of anti-matter for our matter somewhere far out in space. It may be an impossible distance away but never the less. When some smhoo asks "How did something come from nothing" I answer "Well if you add it all up that's what you get".
JXAChambers 5 months ago
what if only anti matter existed?
VBEducation1 5 months ago
@VBEducation1 Nothing would happen :D "Negative" is just from our vision, it would be "Positive" if we were negative.
HacksFirst 5 months ago
@VBEducation1 we wouldnt be alive.
PodaBang 5 months ago
@PodaBang y
VBEducation1 5 months ago
y is the catagory for this vid sports?
VBEducation1 5 months ago
Captain..I can't git the dilithium crystals into the matter- anti-matter compression chamber without blowin us ta smithereens.... (Mr. Scott circa stardate 5923.9)
bheadh 5 months ago
Sometimes I think they are just making shit up. This is one of those times.
TheLifeDegenerator 5 months ago
@TheLifeDegenerator There really is antimatter. They have isolated it in labs using a magnetic field, they have only made a few atoms at a time that don't last that long, but they have isolated it.
NIN1024 5 months ago
@TheLifeDegenerator No, scientists have made anti matter in labs.
aaronrocks87 5 months ago
@TheLifeDegenerator Its because your stupid
ThingE05 5 months ago
@TheLifeDegenerator they made anti matter already and it's held in labs. We make about 0.0001 grams a year and thats just a few atoms but they die quickly. Open your mind to thing the universe is quite ridiculous but that never means it's not real.
IsaacD39 4 months ago
the most intrigueing thing i thought richard feynman saying how anti-matter gong forward in time is just matter going backwards in time, and how therefore anti-matter going backwards in time is the same thing as normal matter going forwards..
cyaard 6 months ago
one in a BILLION might not sound like much...is he really a scientist?
terrorxxxnight 6 months ago
i believe there is an exact universe full of antimatter. same people just opposite
buddy39914 6 months ago
This theory of 1 billion and 1 is not proven by anything.
Putting Lawrence Krauss in a video suppress all credibility.
jb0433628 6 months ago
Okay, so... I've had people tell me that the "Big Bang" wasn't an explosion, that it was just an expansion of an object that was smaller than a proton... Yet what i get from this video and "The Search for Antimatter" is that there was a massive explosion (hence the name "Big Bang") Yet, if there was actually an explosion of that size, or any explosion for that matter at that time... Don't you think that the order of all the matter within that central point would be scattered all over the place?
neveranythingtodoXD 6 months ago
meaning there would be no stars, galaxies, or even life on earth, meaning we wouldn't exist, there is no way a "Big Bang" is able to create a universe so synchronized (Solar systems, galaxies, ect...) Think, about a spiral galaxy, then look at our solar system, then... look at an atom... any resemblance? Now... how can one theory make this one shape, simply disappear? How come astronomists aren't able to come up with the theory, that galaxies are spinning around a central point in the universe?
neveranythingtodoXD 6 months ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
@neveranythingtodoXD
"there is no way a "Big Bang" is able to create a universe so synchronized (Solar systems, galaxies, ect...)"
Why?
"Think, about a spiral galaxy, then look at our solar system, then... look at an atom... any resemblance?"
No.
Everything else you wrote is just senseless rambling. I suggest you at least study the theory a little more before you start criticizing it.
Agen0000 6 months ago
@neveranythingtodoXD
Why is there no way? Also, If this "central point" was where the explosion took place, what would be there to orbit around? an empty space? If everything is expanding from that center point then relative to other objects they don't appear to be moving at all, except when gravitating towards denser objects nearby. So gravity organizes the leftover material into galaxies and within them smaller examples(solar systems, moons orbiting planets, etc).
Kojitsu 5 months ago
@Kojitsu Where would this gravity come from if there is NOTHING that has such a gravitational pull to actually pull the gasses ect. together to create said galaxies, solar systems, planets, ect...
Refer to this website: h t t p : / / thetruth(dot)joltnetworx(dot)com
neveranythingtodoXD 5 months ago
@neveranythingtodoXD
lol nothing? all mass has gravity, including gas. I wouldn't expect such an expansion to be uniform, certainly there were more denser areas of gas that would eventually come together, no matter how small the gravity, and they would eventually attract together and become denser and denser, the gravity would then over time increase.
Kojitsu 5 months ago
@neveranythingtodoXD ... I like your thinking very much. however about big bang, it did not create solar systems etc. It was gravity that created them, billions of years after the Bang, when denser areas with particles attracted others due to gravity, and slowly created everything, very slowly. All other forces helped and shaped this universe but without gravity it wouldn;t start I guess.
Unless of course, we exchange Gravity for the hebrew God. (No offense intended - just mentioning)
damnyourpasswords 4 months ago
@neveranythingtodoXD that might actually be possible come back with some math to support it and then you're officially a Nobel physics nominee, that would basically mean our moon orbits us we orbit our star our star orbits the galaxy and the galaxys orbits the cluster defused galaxy and super clusters orbit the center.
MrAwesomesauce101 4 months ago
@MrAwesomesauce101 well, that's the part i was trying to get at lmfao
neveranythingtodoXD 4 months ago
@neveranythingtodoXD your image of an atom that looks like a solar system is not correct. And where the fuck did you hear that galaxies are spinning around a central point in the universe?
Rusvi1 4 months ago
@Rusvi1 did say i heard it from anywhere other than myself? THAT'S JUST WHAT I THINK COULD BE POSSIBLE... dumbass...
neveranythingtodoXD 3 months ago
@neveranythingtodoXD so you are pulling incorrect info from your ass and expecting people to go along with your retarded ideas?
Rusvi1 3 months ago
@Rusvi1 Actually, no... i was actually sharing my ideas, like many others on these videos, and i find your comments to be very rude, and annoying, so if you have any sense of common courtesy, i would very much appreciate it if you stopped replying to me...
neveranythingtodoXD 3 months ago
@neveranythingtodoXD My comments are rude because your ideas are retarded and have no grounds in reality...get it now?
Rusvi1 3 months ago
@Rusvi1 How is it not possible for galaxies to rotate around a central point? Explain that to me please, how is it impossble? If you can't answer that? GTFO...
neveranythingtodoXD 3 months ago
@neveranythingtodoXD Reality is a bitch...especially for people like you. It's not possible because observations tell us otherwise. ....elementary facts about the universe you live in...
Rusvi1 3 months ago
@neveranythingtodoXD they have the theory, its called the dark matter.
jwliang09 3 months ago
@neveranythingtodoXD because its not a theory, its a fact that galaxies are spinning around their central point, but this is about where the entire galaxy moves
xTwinBladEx 3 months ago
k seriously enough with all this chuck Norris bullshit
this has nothing to do with sum glorified has been film star,
TheJASstudios 6 months ago
the power of will vs the power of fear? green lantern ftw :D
b1gf4tn00b 6 months ago
If matter and aint-matter touched each other it could destroy the ENTIRE universe?!?
35Dez28 6 months ago
@35Dez28 depends how much
buddy39914 6 months ago
how do we know that matter is matter and not anti matter?
SATIJAF 6 months ago
@SATIJAF
Because of the charge.
Tr3vBastard 6 months ago
@Tr3vBastard but how do we know that positive is positive and not negative?
SATIJAF 6 months ago
matter and anti matter were in equal ammounts...but then...chuck norris came...
LTN000 6 months ago
i dont really get how they can find this out
at all
Spaceman174 6 months ago
@Rockyroopam sarcasm?
TheRationalist76 6 months ago
That nip is a pretty smart guy.
Metals999 7 months ago
lie !
drakota28 7 months ago
please listen to the damn video next time rather than just reading the comments. First of all, you must be RETARD to not having any background info about the Big Bang Theory, search it up dumass. Second search up "Universe created from nothing". Third, listen carefully when u click on this 1:38 - 1:49
please educate yourself before you comment again
BladeZGamerZ 7 months ago
if a had a dollar for every thing that can destroy our galaxy i will be a rich man
axzel575 7 months ago 41
@axzel575 8 dollars aint a whole lot of money man.
vegasnegas111 6 months ago
@axzel575 I'D BUY THAT FOR A DOLLAR!
jebsievers 4 months ago
1:57 HAHAHHA All heil the Frog God Froggy !!!!!!!! (look left)
GioGrimaldi 7 months ago
so if the thoery of the existance of a multiverse is true/ would it be possible that there is a univeres the consists of only antimatter? and if so, how could it exist in the same dimension as another universe with matter. if you think about it, if we did live in a miltiverse, what are the chances that every universe that was created was matter?
visitor44534 7 months ago
@visitor44534 Think of the -verses(?) are contained in bubbles. So there could, in fact be an antimatter verse, but it is separate from other verses by the distances between each bubble. And the area between these verses has no matter.
This is how I have taken the explanations from professors like Dr. Kaku and others.
HimesInu 7 months ago
@HimesInu but arnt all verses ever expanding? so at some poin they would collide with eachother
visitor44534 7 months ago
@visitor44534 But we don't know how old these verses are, or if they do in fact continue to expand. Could some actually fall in on themselves? And no one ever said how large this expanse was. For all we know, it could be infinitely large and the bubbles have an effect like magnets to where they never touch. I have no idea. I've never heard more than the "Bubbles in an expanse" theory. I'm adding possibilities as I go.
HimesInu 7 months ago
@HimesInu thats true. its just unfathmable the there is so much "space" out there andwhen i think abt this kinda stuff, it make me feel so insignificant
visitor44534 7 months ago
@visitor44534 Shit, when I think of just our solar system, I feel insignificant. Then I remember that it takes only one man, one idea, to move mountains. Or, in this case, verses.
HimesInu 7 months ago
@HimesInu one man? who?
visitor44534 7 months ago
@visitor44534 Who knows? It could be you. Could be me. All you have to do is remember what Einstein, Galileo, Tesla, da Vinci, any of the great minds did for their respected fields, and even for science. They literally moved mountains when they came up with their theories or inventions.
HimesInu 7 months ago
@HimesInu that is rly cool to think about
visitor44534 7 months ago
its beautiful :'D
omardude2 7 months ago
How do we know that the universe is primarily terrene matter if antimatter looks exactly the same? How do we know there aren't entire superclusters of antimatter?
Orenotter 8 months ago
@Orenotter it doesnt look like the same, if everything in the universe would be anitmatter it would behave the same as the usual matter. the difference is that all protons and electrones switch places i.e. that the electrons are in the nucleus und the protons are surrounding the nucleus.
and why there arent clusters is because if matter and antimatter would be next to each other they would set instantly the strong force free because they attract each other sinc its +&- instead -&- = rejecting
Cabuncle 8 months ago
@Cabuncle
incorrect. The neucleus is made of antiprotons and antineutrons. Orbiting it are electrons. These are exactly the same as their counterparts except for their charges. This includes the chromodynamic charge, which governs the strong force. The antiquarks which make up the neucleus are antired, antigreen and antiblue, which attract each other the same as red, green and blue. (cont'd)
Orenotter 8 months ago
@Cabuncle
And superclusters are millions of light years apart. They would not be next to each other. Even if they were, both the strong force and the EM force would balance to neutral. The only attraction would be gravity.
So back to my original point: a galaxy made up of antimatter would look and act exactly like a galaxy made of terrene matter. I know of no way to test the charge of its neucleons at this distance. How do we know that there aren't antimatter galaxies?
Orenotter 8 months ago
wait.... what if there was a billion particles of matter and a billion and one particles of antimatter?
feuchster 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i thought that it was impossible to destroy or create matter...
johnmattas0 8 months ago
i thought that it was impossible to destroy or create matter...
johnmattas0 8 months ago
@johnmattas0 You're thinking of energy.
nikon1dsmarkIII 8 months ago
@nikon1dsmarkIII Yeah, i forgot that. the atoms destroyed turn INTO energy. however, how about Newton's law of physics saying for each action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. therefore, there should be an equal amount of matter and antimatter. also, i do not think that this is the cause of the big bang although I think it IS an after shock of a greater event...
johnmattas0 8 months ago
@johnmattas0 What does Newton's Law of motion has to do with this. I think when it comes to particle physics, especially quantum physics like matters and anti-maters those laws doesn't hold true anymore, much like the law of conservation of mass is no longer true when it comes to nuclear reactions.
nikon1dsmarkIII 8 months ago