@MrSherlockWatson, he was a pointless character who contributed nothing to what was going on and was used to pad out the film. I don't really care if he was one of the brothers from the true story, if your going to add in characters, actually make them do something and not just stand around doing nothing. And no that isn't like saying indiana Jones was used to make the film longer, the fact that his character actually contributes to the story is the difference. Jamie bell was paid to do nothing
The soviet assault/wedding scene in my opinion was quite powerful and it was one of my favourite parts. I thought that some cuts were a bit careless and got annoying. The action scene at the end was somewhat inconsistent I don't quite see how else that scene could have been shown other than having the Jews stay where they were and watch them trade bullets with the Nazis for 10 minutes until Zus comes. Although I disagree with some of your arguments you're a good reviewer and you get a 8/10. Sub!
yes u base a movie on a true story and wen u do u r required by law to say based on a true story, sayn it is a true story wen it is based on one would be false advertisement
Comment removed
MrSherlockWatson 9 months ago
Comment removed
MrSherlockWatson 1 year ago
@MrSherlockWatson, he was a pointless character who contributed nothing to what was going on and was used to pad out the film. I don't really care if he was one of the brothers from the true story, if your going to add in characters, actually make them do something and not just stand around doing nothing. And no that isn't like saying indiana Jones was used to make the film longer, the fact that his character actually contributes to the story is the difference. Jamie bell was paid to do nothing
TheAutoMaticCritic 7 months ago
Comment removed
MrSherlockWatson 1 year ago
This film didn't get advertise like Valkyrie did, and this movie kicked so much more ass then that film did. Movie rating 4.2/5
if you love WWII and like a good story give this movie a try.=)
joe16730 1 year ago
the "heros" in the story were in real life horrible villians...
boxerjump 2 years ago
..please explain i would like to know :c/
minablock 2 years ago
@boxerjump no, it depends on whos view your looking from. A nazi's view, a jew's view or somone who just stands by
MrSherlockWatson 9 months ago
I loved how Zus or wutever his name was used his gun, kinda like scarface :)
reaperkiller117 2 years ago
The soviet assault/wedding scene in my opinion was quite powerful and it was one of my favourite parts. I thought that some cuts were a bit careless and got annoying. The action scene at the end was somewhat inconsistent I don't quite see how else that scene could have been shown other than having the Jews stay where they were and watch them trade bullets with the Nazis for 10 minutes until Zus comes. Although I disagree with some of your arguments you're a good reviewer and you get a 8/10. Sub!
McFuggly 2 years ago
Comment removed
McFuggly 2 years ago
yes u base a movie on a true story and wen u do u r required by law to say based on a true story, sayn it is a true story wen it is based on one would be false advertisement
ampattic 3 years ago
I don't understand, in your earlier comment you said it was a true story not based on one, and now your saying it is based on one?
TheAutoMaticCritic 3 years ago
yea it is thats why it ends with the REAL pictures of the people.
reaperkiller117 2 years ago
Eh No... The film was based off of a true story, thats kind of how these things work, you base a film on a true story
TheAutoMaticCritic 3 years ago